Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 74 references

Two Channel Kondo behavior in the quantum XX chain with a boundary defect

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A boundary defect in the quantum XX chain gives two-channel Kondo physics: the impurity g-function equals √2, with a J=√2 transition to a bound-mode phase.

desk verdict A clean Majorana realization of two-channel Kondo physics in the XX chain, with credible CFT and DMRG support for g = √2, but the thermodynamic derivation has an unshown (and suspect) low-T evaluation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16415 v2 pith:2ZSSVUYP submitted 2025-01-27 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

Yicheng Tang , Pradip Kattel , J.H. Pixley , Natan Andrei This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords two-channelKondoeffectquantumXXchainboundarydefectMajoranafermiong-functionimpurityentropyconformalfieldtheoryboundmode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish that a single spin-1/2 impurity coupled to the edge of the one-dimensional quantum XX chain is not a trivial boundary perturbation but a lattice realization of the two-channel Kondo effect. In Majorana fermion language, the impurity fractionalizes into two Majoranas: one decouples completely, and the other is overscreened by one of the two bulk Majorana chains. The paper computes the impurity g-function through both a thermodynamic free-energy calculation and an entanglement-entropy difference, and finds the non-integer value $\sqrt{2}$, the hallmark of two-channel Kondo criticality. For boundary coupling $J>\sqrt{2}$ a massive boundary-bound mode appears, making the impurity entropy non-monotonic; the authors read this as a breakdown of boundary CFT rather than a violation of the g-theorem.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the free-fermion decomposition of the XX chain into two independent Majorana chains, written explicitly as $H_m = \sum_{l=1}^{N-1} i(\gamma_{2l}\gamma_{2l+1}-\gamma_{2l-1}\gamma_{2l+2}) + iJ\gamma_0\gamma_1$. The boundary scattering amplitude $A_B(k) = \frac{(1-J^2)+e^{2ik}}{1+(1-J^2)e^{2ik}}$ encodes everything: its phase determines the Kondo temperature, and its pole at imaginary quasimomentum gives the bound mode for $J>\sqrt{2}$. At low energy the coupled chain is described by an Ising boundary conformal field theory whose boundary condition flows from Neumann to Dirichlet, while the second chain is untouched; the ratio of modular S-matrix elements $S_{I,\sigma}/S_{I,I}$ for that flow equals $\sqrt{2}$, which is the g-function. The same g-function is recovered independently from the entanglement-entropy difference $\ln(g_{\rm UV}/g_{\rm IR})$ between weakly and strongly coupled chains.

What would settle it

Since the model is free-fermion, exact diagonalization of $H_m$ for $N$ of order $10^3$--$10^4$ at $J=1$ can settle the claim: the impurity free energy must approach $-(T/2)\ln 2$ at low temperature, giving $S_{\rm imp}(T\to0)=\ln\sqrt{2}$. If instead the low-temperature impurity entropy is $\ln 2$, or if a DMRG run with boundary oscillations subtracted shows the far-boundary difference $S_{\rm diff}$ not extrapolating to $0$ for a single impurity, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that $H_s = \sum_{i=1}^{N-1}(\sigma^x_i\sigma^x_{i+1}+\sigma^y_i\sigma^y_{i+1}) + J\sigma^x_0\sigma^x_1$ flows at low energies to the same overscreened fixed point as the two-channel Kondo model. After the Jordan-Wigner transformation the bulk becomes two independent free Majorana chains and the impurity becomes two Majoranas, $\gamma_{-1}$ and $\gamma_0$; only $\gamma_0$ couples to one chain, so exactly one channel acquires a boundary phase shift $\delta(k)$ whose small-momentum form yields a Kondo temperature $T_K = J^2/(2-J^2)$. The resulting impurity free energy gives zero-temperature impurity entropy $S_{\rm imp} = \ln\sqrt{2}$, i.e. $g=\sqrt{2}$, matching the universal non-integer boundary degeneracy of the two-channel Kondo problem. For $J>\sqrt{2}$ a complex quasimomentum appears in the scattering equation, producing an exponentially localized bound mode with energy $E_B = J^2/\sqrt{J^2-1}$ that breaks scale invariance and makes the impurity entropy non-monotonic. Tensor-network DMRG calculations of the entanglement-entropy difference across the chain confirm $\ln\sqrt{2}$ near the impurity and $0$ at the far boundary, consistent with a Neumann-to-Dirichlet boundary flow in one Ising chain.

Load-bearing premise

The result relies on the assumption that the only low-energy effect of the impurity is to flip one of the two independent Majorana chains from a free boundary condition to a fixed one, while the other chain remains free; if the actual boundary flow is different, the $\sqrt{2}$ value does not follow from the lattice model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For all $J<\sqrt{2}$ the zero-temperature impurity entropy is $\ln\sqrt{2}$, independent of the coupling strength, a signature of overscreened two-channel Kondo behavior.
  • The Kondo temperature $T_K=J^2/(2-J^2)$ diverges at $J=\sqrt{2}$ and becomes negative beyond it, marking the onset of the bound-mode regime.
  • For $J>\sqrt{2}$ the impurity entropy is not monotonic in temperature, so the g-theorem cannot be applied; this is attributed to the massive bound mode breaking conformal invariance.
  • The boundary defect provides an exactly solvable lattice route to the two-channel Kondo fixed point, with the g-function confirmed by two independent calculations: thermodynamics and entanglement entropy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the two-channel behavior follows only from the Majorana decoupling and the single boundary phase shift, the same $g=\sqrt{2}$ result should survive in other integrable free-fermion spin chains with a boundary coupling of the same form; a direct test would be to repeat the calculation for an anisotropic XY chain.
  • The $J>\sqrt{2}$ regime is a rare exactly solvable example of a non-monotonic boundary entropy driven by a massive mode, and could serve as a controlled test bed for how g-theorem violations arise when conformal symmetry is lost.
  • If the finite-size corrections to the DMRG entropy difference are understood, the model could be used as a minimal benchmark for measuring two-channel Kondo fractional entropy in cold-atom or trapped-ion emulators of XX chains.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the spin-1/2 XX chain with an impurity spin at the boundary, coupled to the first bulk spin by a J σx0 σx1 term. Using a Jordan-Wigner transformation, the model is mapped to two Majorana chains, one of which is unaffected by the impurity while the other acquires a momentum-dependent phase shift; one impurity Majorana decouples entirely. The authors claim two-channel Kondo physics: for J < √2 the impurity entropy flows from ln 2 in the ultraviolet to ln √2 in the infrared, so the impurity g-function is √2, and for J > √2 a boundary-bound mode appears and the impurity entropy becomes non-monotonic. The g-function is computed in three ways: a thermodynamic free-energy calculation starting from Eq. (8), a boundary CFT calculation using the Ising modular S-matrix, and a DMRG comparison of entanglement entropies of chains with and without the impurity coupling.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper provides an exactly solvable lattice model realizing the two-channel Kondo fixed point and, for J > √2, a concrete example in which a massive boundary-bound mode invalidates the g-theorem. The model is simple and all computations are explicitly described, which makes the result easy to verify and useful as a benchmark. Strengths of the paper are its combination of exact thermodynamic arguments, a standard CFT boundary-state computation, and independent DMRG data; the numerical evidence is presented directly and the analytic predictions are falsifiable. The identification of the decoupled Majorana and the non-integer g = √2 is an appealing demonstration of non-Fermi-liquid boundary entropy in a non-interacting fermionic model.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (8) and the low-T expansion] The integration range in Eq. (8) is not specified. The quoted low-temperature result Eq. (9) only follows if the phase-shift integral is taken over k ∈ [0, π/2], the momentum range of each Majorana chain after Jordan-Wigner, because over that range ∫ f'_T(k) dk tends to ln 2 as T → 0, giving (T/π)δ(π/2) ln 2 = (T/2) ln 2. If the integral were instead interpreted over the full Brillouin zone [0, π], the same integral would tend to a T-independent constant, and the entropy would not become ln √2 at low temperature. Please state the integration limits explicitly and include the evaluation leading to Eq. (9), since this is the load-bearing step in the thermodynamic derivation of g = √2.
  2. [Entanglement entropy, Eq. (12) and surrounding text] The interpretation of Sdiff is internally inconsistent. The text first says that at the left end the two chains have the same boundary conditions and the difference vanishes, while at the right end the J = 1 chain flows to Dirichlet and the difference is ln √2; this is opposite to the location of the impurity in Eq. (1) and to the numerical results shown in Fig. 4. More importantly, the relation Sdiff = ln(g_UV/g_IR) is used for the single-impurity chain, while for the two-impurity chain the same value ln √2 is expected. If the standard boundary CFT entanglement formula S = (c/6) ln(...) + (1/2) ln g + const. is used, the single-impurity difference should be (1/2) ln(g_UV/g_IR), while the two-impurity difference should be ln(g_UV/g_IR) if both boundaries change. Please state precisely which formula from Refs. [65,66] is being applied and reconcile the factors, because the DMRG confirmation of g = √2 depends on this relation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Ground state energy, text after Eq. (6)] The formula E0 = -2J^2 sec^{-1}(J)/(π√(J^2-1)) - 4(N+1)/π + 2 should specify the range of J for which it applies; for J < 1 the arcsec is complex, and if the intended expression is arccos(1/J), this should be stated to avoid confusion.
  2. [Eq. (9)] The notation Fimp(J,T→0) = -T/2 ln2 - ... is inconsistent because the right-hand side is a function of T; please write Fimp(J,T) ≈ -T ln√2 - π/(24 TK)T^2 + O(T^3) as T→0 and clarify that the T = 0 value is the limit of the leading term.
  3. [Fig. 3 inset] The inset label '1/2 ln2 + 12 T/TK' is missing a factor of π; according to Eq. (9) the term should be π/12 T/TK, and the sign in the inset appears to differ from the derivative of the T^2 term in Eq. (9).
  4. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'one is overscreened by the free fermion in bulk' should be 'by the free fermions in the bulk' or 'by the bulk fermions' for grammatical clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: g=√2 is obtained from an exact free-fermion spectrum plus standard Ising boundary CFT, with independent DMRG check; self-citations to [35] supply parameter-free prior results and do not define the prediction into existence.

full rationale

The central prediction g=√2 is not equivalent by construction to its inputs. The lattice model is mapped by Jordan-Wigner to free Majorana chains (Eq. (3)); the quasimomenta in Eqs. (4)-(5) are exact free-fermion boundary-condition equations, with Eq. (5) cited to [35] but parameter-free and independently checkable, not fitted. The impurity free energy (8) and its low-T limit (9) are presented as an evaluation of that exact spectrum; the paper does not display the integration that turns Eq. (8) into Eq. (9), which is an omitted proof or possible correctness gap, but there is no evidence that the result is inserted as an input. The bCFT derivation in Eq. (11) uses the standard Ising modular S-matrix (external references [54,59,62]) and only uses the lattice phase shift to identify one Neumann-to-Dirichlet boundary flow; it is a genuine application of known CFT, not a re-labelling of the target. The DMRG computation of Sdiff in Eq. (12) is an external numerical check and is not constrained to produce √2. Self-citations ([35,49]) provide the bound-mode and spectrum results from prior work of the same group, but those are independent, parameter-free exact results, so per the review rules they do not raise the circularity score. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no 'uniqueness' theorem is imported to forbid alternatives. The suspicious Eq. (8)-to-(9) step should be checked for correctness, but it is not a circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters; the only coupling J is a Hamiltonian parameter that is scanned, not fit. Majorana fermions are used as a mathematical transformation, not as new physical entities. The central predictions rely on standard CFT technology and the low-energy identification of the chain as two Ising CFTs, which are domain assumptions rather than ad hoc inventions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The bulk XX chain in the Majorana representation decouples into two independent Majorana chains, which at low energies are described by two independent Ising CFTs.
    Invoked after Eq. (3) and in Fig. 1. The exact decoupling is a direct consequence of the free-fermion form; the Ising CFT description is a low-energy effective approximation.
  • domain assumption The impurity coupling J σx0 σx1 induces a boundary RG flow from Neumann to Dirichlet boundary conditions in exactly one of the two Ising CFTs.
    Assumed in the CFT section before Eq. (11). This is a standard result for a relevant boundary perturbation, but it is not derived from the lattice Hamiltonian in this paper.
  • domain assumption The g-theorem applies for J < √2, meaning the boundary entropy decreases monotonically along the RG flow.
    Used to interpret the monotonic impurity entropy and to frame the non-monotonic case as a violation caused by a massive mode. Cited to Friedan-Konechny and Harper et al.
  • standard math The Cardy boundary state formalism and the Ising modular S-matrix are correct.
    Used in Eq. (11) to compute the g-function ratio. These are established results in boundary conformal field theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two Channel Kondo behavior in the quantum XX chain with a boundary defect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ZSSVUYP

@misc{pith2026250116415,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two Channel Kondo behavior in the quantum XX chain with a boundary defect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ZSSVUYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16415}
}
abstract

We demonstrate that a boundary defect in the single spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ quantum $XX$ chain exhibits two-channel Kondo physics. Due to the presence of the defect, the edge spin fractionalizes into two Majorana fermions, out of which one decouples, and one is overscreened by the free fermion in bulk, leading to non-trivial boundary behavior characteristic of the two-channel Kondo model. When the ratio of boundary to bulk coupling exceeds a critical value of $\sqrt{2}$, a massive boundary-bound mode is exponentially localized near the impurity site for strong impurity coupling. This leads to unusual behavior in physical quantities, such as the $g$-function not being monotonic. We compute the $g-$function of the impurity from both thermodynamic and entanglement entropy calculations and show that it takes a non-integer value of $\sqrt{2}$ just as in the two-channel Kondo problem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16415 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    The Kondo impurity in the large spin limit

    A. Krishnan and M. A. Metlitski, The kondo impurity in the large spin limit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12650 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Kauch, P

    A. Kauch, P. Pudleiner, K. Astleithner, P. Thunstr¨ om, T. Ribic, and K. Held, Generic optical excitations of cor- related systems: π-tons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 047401 (2020)

    2020

  3. [2]

    = ∞ and when there is a boundary bound mode TK(J > √

    work page

  4. [3]

    < 0. The low-temperature expansion for the free energy, after evaluating the integral in Eq.(8), becomes (when J < √ 2) Fimp(J, T→ 0) = − T 2 ln 2 − π 24 TK T 2 + O(T 3), (9) The value at T = 0 is Fimp(T → 0) = −T ln √

    work page

  5. [4]

    These two limiting cases show that the impurity en- tropy Simp(T ) = −∂T Fimp(T ) is ln √ 2 in the IR, whereas it is ln 2 in the UV

    At high-temperature, the integrand T f′ T (k) → 0 in Eq.(8) as T → ∞, thus Fimp(T → ∞) = −T ln 2. These two limiting cases show that the impurity en- tropy Simp(T ) = −∂T Fimp(T ) is ln √ 2 in the IR, whereas it is ln 2 in the UV. At low temperature, the impurity entropy can be expressed as a universal function in the form Simp( T TK ) as shown in the ins...

    work page

  6. [5]

    The impurity entropy in the ultraviolet limit (high temper- ature) is Simp(T → ∞) = ln 2, which shows that the impurity is asymptotically free. In the infrared limit (low temperature), however, there is residual entropy Simp(T → 0) = ln √ 2, which suggests non-Fermi liquid behavior as seen in other systems with 2-channel behav- ior [22, 51–53]. Notably, t...

    work page

  7. [6]

    Notice that this change in boundary con- ditions occurs only in one of the two chains

    (11) This ratio reflects the additional boundary entropy intro- duced by the change from Neumann to Dirichlet bound- ary conditions. Notice that this change in boundary con- ditions occurs only in one of the two chains. Hence, the total entropy change due to the impurity isSimp = ln g = ln √ 2, as previously computed using thermodynamical considerations. ...

    work page

  8. [7]

    We compute the entanglement entropy using the density matrix renormal- ization group method using the ITensor library [63, 64]. More concretely, we define Sdiff = S(j, J= 1, N) − S(j, J→ 0+, N) (12) where S(j, J, N) represents the entanglement entropy of the chain governed by the spin chain Hamiltonian Eq.(1) with boundary coupling J and the total number ...

    work page

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    The von Neumann entanglement entropy quantifies en- tanglement between regions A and B in a spin chain

    independent of the site j in the thermo- dynamic limit [66] as the two impurity drive the bound- ary flow from Neumann-Neumann to Dirichlet-Dirichlet boundary conditions. The von Neumann entanglement entropy quantifies en- tanglement between regions A and B in a spin chain. Gi...

  2. [9]

    R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, Fractons, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 295 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    Vandeparre, M

    H. Vandeparre, M. Pi˜ neirua, F. Brau, B. Roman, J. Bico, C. Gay, W. Bao, C. N. Lau, P. M. Reis, and P. Damman, Wrinkling hierarchy in constrained thin sheets from sus- pended graphene to curtains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 224301 (2011)

    2011

  4. [11]

    L. D. Landau, Electron motion in crystal lattices, Phys. Z. Sowjet. 3, 664 (1933)

    1933

  5. [12]

    Pines and D

    D. Pines and D. Bohm, A collective description of elec- tron interactions: Ii. collective vs individual particle as- pects of the interactions, Phys. Rev. 85, 338 (1952)

    1952

  6. [13]

    Kuwata-Gonokami, 2.07 - high- density excitons in semiconductors, in Comprehensive Semiconductor Science and Technology, edited by P

    M. Kuwata-Gonokami, 2.07 - high- density excitons in semiconductors, in Comprehensive Semiconductor Science and Technology, edited by P. Bhattacharya, R. Fornari, and H. Kamimura (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011) pp. 213–255

    2011

  7. [14]

    R. D. Peccei, The strong cp problem and axions, in Axions: Theory, Cosmology, and Experimental Searches, edited by M. Kuster, G. Raffelt, and B. Beltr´ an (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008) pp. 3–17

    2008

  8. [15]

    H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, and A. C. Gossard, The frac- tional quantum hall effect, Reviews of Modern Physics 71, S298 (1999)

    1999

  9. [16]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect, Nuclear Physics B 360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  10. [17]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires, Physics-uspekhi 44, 131 (2001)

    2001

  11. [18]

    Andrei and C

    N. Andrei and C. Destri, Solution of the multichannel kondo problem, Physical review letters 52, 364 (1984)

    1984

  12. [19]

    Tsvelick and P

    A. Tsvelick and P. Wiegmann, Exact solution of the mul- tichannel kondo problem, scaling, and integrability, Jour- nal of Statistical Physics 38, 125 (1985)

    1985

  13. [20]

    A. W. Ludwig and I. Affleck, Exact conformal-field- theory results on the multi-channel kondo effect: Asymp- totic three-dimensional space-and time-dependent multi- point and many-particle green’s functions, Nuclear Physics B 428, 545 (1994)

    1994

  14. [21]

    Affleck and A

    I. Affleck and A. W. Ludwig, Exact conformal-field- theory results on the multichannel kondo effect: Single- fermion green’s function, self-energy, and resistivity, Physical Review B 48, 7297 (1993)

    1993

  15. [22]

    Emery and S

    V. Emery and S. Kivelson, Mapping of the two-channel kondo problem to a resonant-level model, Physical Re- view B 46, 10812 (1992)

    1992

  16. [23]

    A. K. Mitchell and E. Sela, Universal low-temperature crossover in two-channel kondo models, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 85, 235127 (2012)

    2012

  17. [24]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, Y. Wang, and X. Yin, Topological defect lines and renormalization group flows in two dimensions, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019, 1 (2019). 6

    2019

  18. [25]

    ground-state degeneracy

    I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Universal noninteger “ground-state degeneracy” in critical quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 161 (1991)

    1991

  19. [26]

    Affleck, A

    I. Affleck, A. W. Ludwig, and B. A. Jones, Conformal- field-theory approach to the two-impurity kondo prob- lem: Comparison with numerical renormalization-group results, Physical Review B 52, 9528 (1995)

    1995

  20. [27]

    Altland, B

    A. Altland, B. B´ eri, R. Egger, and A. M. Tsvelik, Multi- channel kondo impurity dynamics in a majorana device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076401 (2014)

    2014

  21. [28]

    P. L. Lopes, I. Affleck, and E. Sela, Anyons in multi- channel kondo systems, Physical Review B 101, 085141 (2020)

    2020

  22. [29]

    C. Han, Z. Iftikhar, Y. Kleeorin, A. Anthore, F. Pierre, Y. Meir, A. K. Mitchell, and E. Sela, Fractional entropy of multichannel kondo systems from conductance-charge relations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 146803 (2022)

    2022

  23. [30]

    K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phe- nomena and the kondo problem, Reviews of modern physics 47, 773 (1975)

    1975

  24. [31]

    Affleck, A

    I. Affleck, A. W. Ludwig, H.-B. Pang, and D. Cox, Relevance of anisotropy in the multichannel kondo ef- fect: Comparison of conformal field theory and numeri- cal renormalization-group results, Physical Review B 45, 7918 (1992)

    1992

  25. [32]

    T´ oth, Numerical renormalization group study of the two-channel kondo model, (2009)

    A. T´ oth, Numerical renormalization group study of the two-channel kondo model, (2009)

    2009

  26. [33]

    Bulla, T

    R. Bulla, T. A. Costi, and T. Pruschke, Numerical renor- malization group method for quantum impurity systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 80, 395 (2008)

    2008

  27. [34]

    Jerez, N

    A. Jerez, N. Andrei, and G. Zar´ and, Solution of the mul- tichannel coqblin-schrieffer impurity model and applica- tion to multilevel systems, Physical Review B 58, 3814 (1998)

    1998

  28. [36]

    Andrei and H

    N. Andrei and H. Johannesson, Heisenberg chain with impurities (an integrable model), Physics Letters A 100, 108 (1984)

    1984

  29. [37]

    Iftikhar, S

    Z. Iftikhar, S. Jezouin, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, F. Par- mentier, A. Cavanna, and F. Pierre, Two-channel kondo effect and renormalization flow with macroscopic quan- tum charge states, Nature 526, 233 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Iftikhar, A

    Z. Iftikhar, A. Anthore, A. Mitchell, F. Parmentier, U. Gennser, A. Ouerghi, A. Cavanna, C. Mora, P. Simon, and F. Pierre, Tunable quantum criticality and super- ballistic transport in a “charge” kondo circuit, Science 360, 1315 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Pouse, L

    W. Pouse, L. Peeters, C. L. Hsueh, U. Gennser, A. Ca- vanna, M. A. Kastner, A. K. Mitchell, and D. Goldhaber- Gordon, Quantum simulation of an exotic quantum crit- ical point in a two-site charge kondo circuit, Nature Physics 19, 492 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Karki, E

    D. Karki, E. Boulat, W. Pouse, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, A. K. Mitchell, and C. Mora, Z 3 parafermion in the dou- ble charge kondo model, Physical Review Letters 130, 146201 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Kattel, P

    P. Kattel, P. R. Pasnoori, J. Pixley, P. Azaria, and N. An- drei, Kondo effect in the isotropic heisenberg spin chain, Physical Review B 109, 174416 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Kattel, Y

    P. Kattel, Y. Tang, J. H. Pixley, and N. Andrei, The kondo effect in the quantum xx spin chain, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Schlottmann, Impurity-induced critical behaviour in antiferromagnetic heisenberg chains, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 3, 6617 (1991)

    P. Schlottmann, Impurity-induced critical behaviour in antiferromagnetic heisenberg chains, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 3, 6617 (1991)

    1991

  36. [44]

    Sacramento, Thermodynamics of a spin-s’impurity in a spin-s antiferromagnetic heisenberg chain, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 5, 6999 (1993)

    P. Sacramento, Thermodynamics of a spin-s’impurity in a spin-s antiferromagnetic heisenberg chain, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 5, 6999 (1993)

    1993

  37. [45]

    Liu, Low-temperature behavior of a magnetic im- purity in a heisenberg chain, Physical review letters 79, 293 (1997)

    Y.-L. Liu, Low-temperature behavior of a magnetic im- purity in a heisenberg chain, Physical review letters 79, 293 (1997)

    1997

  38. [46]

    Laflorencie, E

    N. Laflorencie, E. S. Sørensen, and I. Affleck, The kondo effect in spin chains, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008, P02007 (2008)

    2008

  39. [47]

    Wang, Exact solution of the open heisenberg chain with two impurities, Physical Review B56, 14045 (1997)

    Y. Wang, Exact solution of the open heisenberg chain with two impurities, Physical Review B56, 14045 (1997)

    1997

  40. [48]

    Frahm and A

    H. Frahm and A. A. Zvyagin, The open spin chain with impurity: an exact solution, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 9, 9939 (1997)

    1997

  41. [49]

    Giuliano, D

    D. Giuliano, D. Rossini, and A. Trombettoni, From kondo effect to weak-link regime in quantum spin-1 2 spin chains, Physical Review B 98, 235164 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Coleman, L

    P. Coleman, L. Ioffe, and A. Tsvelik, Pedestrian approach to the two-channel kondo model, arXiv preprint cond- mat/9504006 (1995)

    1995

  43. [51]

    Friedan and A

    D. Friedan and A. Konechny, Boundary entropy of one- dimensional quantum systems at low temperature, Phys- ical review letters 93, 030402 (2004)

    2004

  44. [52]

    Harper, H

    J. Harper, H. Kanda, T. Takayanagi, and K. Tasuki, g theorem from strong subadditivity, Physical Review Let- ters 133, 031501 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Zvyagin, Possibility of direct observation of edge ma- jorana modes in quantum chains, Physical Review Let- ters 110, 217207 (2013)

    A. Zvyagin, Possibility of direct observation of edge ma- jorana modes in quantum chains, Physical Review Let- ters 110, 217207 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    Perk and H

    J. Perk and H. Capel, Time-dependent xx-correlation functions in the one-dimensional xy-model, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications89, 265 (1977)

    1977

  47. [55]

    Zhang, A

    G.-M. Zhang, A. Hewson, and R. Bulla, Majorana fermion formulation of the two channel kondo model, Solid state communications 112, 105 (1999)

    1999

  48. [56]

    Y. Tang, P. Kattel, J. Pixley, and N. Andrei, Quantum zeno effect in noisy integrable quantum circuits for im- purity models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10304 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Andrei, K

    N. Andrei, K. Furuya, and J. Lowenstein, Solution of the kondo problem, Reviews of modern physics 55, 331 (1983)

    1983

  50. [58]

    Kattel, A

    P. Kattel, A. Zhakenov, and N. Andrei, Overscreened spin- 1 2 kondo impurity and shiba state at the edge of a one-dimensional spin-1 superconducting wire, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01924 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Schlottmann and P

    P. Schlottmann and P. Sacramento, Multichannel kondo problem and some applications, Advances in Physics 42, 641 (1993)

    1993

  52. [60]

    Granath and H

    M. Granath and H. Johannesson, Two-channel kondo ef- fect in a luttinger liquid, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Con- densed Matter 103, 225 (1996)

    1996

  53. [61]

    ground-state degeneracy

    I. Affleck and A. W. Ludwig, Universal noninteger “ground-state degeneracy”in critical quantum systems, Physical Review Letters 67, 161 (1991)

    1991

  54. [62]

    Casini, I

    H. Casini, I. S. Landea, and G. Torroba, The g-theorem and quantum information theory, Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, 1 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    Pozsgay, On o(1) contributions to the free energy in bethe ansatz systems: the exact g-function, Journal of High Energy Physics 2010, 1 (2010)

    B. Pozsgay, On o(1) contributions to the free energy in bethe ansatz systems: the exact g-function, Journal of High Energy Physics 2010, 1 (2010)

    2010

  56. [64]

    S. He, T. Numasawa, T. Takayanagi, and K. Watanabe, 7 Quantum dimension as entanglement entropy in two di- mensional conformal field theories, Physical Review D 90, 041701 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    Francesco, P

    P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal, Conformal field theory (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  58. [66]

    Cardy, Boundary conformal field theory, arXiv preprint hep-th/0411189 (2004)

    J. Cardy, Boundary conformal field theory, arXiv preprint hep-th/0411189 (2004)

    2004 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Ishibashi, The boundary and crosscap states in con- formal field theories, Modern Physics Letters A 4, 251 (1989)

    N. Ishibashi, The boundary and crosscap states in con- formal field theories, Modern Physics Letters A 4, 251 (1989)

    1989

  60. [68]

    Caputa and M

    P. Caputa and M. M. Rams, Quantum dimensions from local operator excitations in the ising model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50, 055002 (2017)

    2017

  61. [69]

    J. L. Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the verlinde formula, Nuclear Physics B 324, 581 (1989)

    1989

  62. [70]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The iten- sor software library for tensor network calculations, Sci- Post Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Code- base release 0.3 for ITensor, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    Alkurtass, A

    B. Alkurtass, A. Bayat, I. Affleck, S. Bose, H. Johannes- son, P. Sodano, E. S. Sørensen, and K. Le Hur, Entangle- ment structure of the two-channel kondo model, Physical Review B 93, 081106 (2016)

    2016

  65. [73]

    Affleck, N

    I. Affleck, N. Laflorencie, and E. S. Sørensen, Entangle- ment entropy in quantum impurity systems and systems with boundaries, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42, 504009 (2009)

    2009

  66. [74]

    Laflorencie, E

    N. Laflorencie, E. S. Sørensen, M.-S. Chang, and I. Af- fleck, Boundary effects in the critical scaling of entangle- ment entropy in 1d systems, Physical review letters 96, 100603 (2006)

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.