Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 5 cited by

Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An asymptotically free three-dimensional theory can spontaneously break scale symmetry, yielding a massless dilaton.

desk verdict A solid large-N dilaton computation with new explicit formulas, but the stated derivation from Eq. (1) misses a needed N-scaling of the scalar sector. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00107 v1 pith:XJW2SJON submitted 2025-01-31 hep-th hep-lathep-ph

Charlie Cresswell-Hogg , Daniel F. Litim , Roman Zwicky This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-lathep-ph
keywords dilatonspontaneousscalesymmetrybreakingGross-Neveu-Yukawatheorylarge-Nexpansionconformalwindowdouble-scalinglimitGoldstonebosonthree-dimensionalfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa theory with many fermion flavours spontaneously breaks scale symmetry exactly at the endpoint of its conformal window, producing a massless Goldstone boson: the dilaton. The vacuum expectation value of the scalar emerges through a double-scaling limit, and the dilaton appears as a massless pole in the scalar two-point function. The authors compute its decay constant and show that small explicit perturbations give a universal induced dilaton mass, consistent with soft-dilaton theorems. If correct, the model is a rare solvable example of a massless dilaton in a non-supersymmetric, asymptotically free theory.

What carries the argument

The central object is the large-N quantum effective potential Ueff(φ) = (1/3!) λ3 $φ^{3}$ + (1/3!) λcrit_3 |φ|^3 with λcrit_3 = 1/π, whose non-analytic |φ|^3 term is generated by fermion fluctuations. At the endpoint |λ3| = λcrit_3 the potential is half-sidedly flat, so any φ0 > 0 is a vacuum; this flat direction is reached through a double-scaling limit δλ2 → 0−, δλ3 → 0+ with φ0 held fixed. The second engine is the scalar two-point function obtained by integrating out fermions: at the endpoint the constant cubic term is exactly cancelled by the one-loop fermion bubble, leaving Πφ ∝ 1/$p^{2}$ — the massless dilaton pole.

What would settle it

Compute the next-to-leading correction in the fermion-flavour expansion to the effective potential or to the scalar two-point function at φ0 > 0. If that correction makes the potential minimum discrete rather than a flat line, or moves the pole in Πφ(p, φ0) from $p^{2}$ = 0 to $p^{2}$ of order 1/N, then the massless dilaton does not survive beyond the leading large-N approximation. Lattice simulation of the three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model near the endpoint could also look for a scalar mass that does not vanish as the explicit perturbation is removed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the endpoint of the conformal window, where the cubic coupling reaches its critical value |λ3| = λcrit_3 = 1/π, the quantum effective potential becomes half-sidedly flat, so any positive vacuum expectation value φ0 > 0 is a degenerate vacuum. The scalar two-point function then develops a massless pole: Πφ(p, φ0) = (N/(12π|φ0|) + N/$H^{2}$)^{-1} 1/$p^{2}$, which the authors identify as a massless dilaton in the spectrum. They extract the dilaton decay constant from the pole's residue, find $F_D^{2}$ = N|φ0|/(12π) + $Nφ0^{2}$/$H^{2}$, and show that small scalar-mass or fermion-mass perturbations induce a dilaton mass $m_D^{2}$ = $6πH^{2}$$φ0^{2}$/($H^{2}$+12πφ0) δλ3, independent of the symmetry-breaking mechanism. The resulting product $m_D^{2}$ $F_D^{2}$ = (1/2) N $φ0^{3}$ δλ3 matches the soft dilaton theorem, providing an independent consistency check of the fermion condensate.

Load-bearing premise

The construction depends on the many-fermion-flavour effective potential being exactly right, including the flat direction at the endpoint and the cancellation that gives the massless pole; if corrections from the next order in the fermion-flavour expansion curve the flat direction or give the dilaton a small mass, the central claim collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is right, a massless dilaton exists in the spectrum of an asymptotically free, non-supersymmetric three-dimensional theory, giving a first-principles template for spontaneous scale-symmetry breaking.
  • The decay constant F_D^2 ∼ N|φ0| is an order parameter for scale breaking, so the vacuum expectation value φ0 sets the new mass scale.
  • Small scalar-mass or fermion-mass perturbations induce a dilaton mass given by the same formula, m_D^2 = 6πH^2φ0^2/(H^2+12πφ0) δλ3, independent of the perturbation mechanism.
  • The product m_D^2 F_D^2 = (1/2) N φ0^3 δλ3 satisfies the soft dilaton theorem, providing a cross-check of the condensation computation.
  • Removing the high scale H^2 → ∞ leaves a series of CFTs whose endpoint has an exact vacuum moduli space parametrised by φ0, a rare non-supersymmetric example.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper computes the dilaton pole at leading order in the fermion-flavour expansion; an obvious next step the authors do not take is to ask whether subleading corrections lift the flat direction or shift the pole away from p^2 = 0. If they do, 'massless' becomes a large-N artefact.
  • The double-scaling-limit technique looks transferable to other theories with conformal windows, such as gauge theories with many fermions; if it transfers, the universal formula m_D^2 F_D^2 ∝ φ0^3 δλ3 may serve as a diagnostic for a light dilaton in near-conformal QCD-like theories.
  • The result that the induced mass formula is independent of the symmetry-breaking mechanism suggests that any explicit perturbation with the right scaling dimension will enter through the same combination, which could be tested by adding a φ^2 perturbation with a different coupling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This Letter studies the three-dimensional Gross-Neveu-Yukawa model with N two-component Dirac fermions and a real scalar. In the large-N limit, the quantum effective potential (2) is taken from the authors' earlier work: a cubic interaction λ3 φ³/6 plus a non-analytic |φ|³/(6π) generated by fermion fluctuations. The paper argues that for |λ3| ≤ 1/π the potential is stable and that at the endpoint λ3 = -1/π it becomes half-sidedly flat, with arbitrary vacuum expectation value φ0 > 0. The scalar two-point function is then computed from the effective action (7); at the endpoint the constant terms cancel, giving the massless pole (10). The residue is used with a soft-dilaton theorem to obtain the decay constant (12), the OPE gives the fermion condensate (13), and scalar or fermion mass perturbations induce the dilaton mass (14). Agreement with double-soft dilaton theorems is demonstrated.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a rare explicit large-N example of spontaneous scale-symmetry breaking with a massless dilaton in a three-dimensional asymptotically free theory, with computable decay constant, condensate, and induced mass. The explicit spectral computation and the independent soft-theorem consistency checks are assets, and the double-scaling limit is a concrete tool. However, several load-bearing inputs are imported from companion papers, one of which is unpublished, and an unresolved normalization ambiguity in the large-N counting prevents the central cancellation in Eq. (10) from being verified from the manuscript alone. The result is therefore plausible and interesting rather than established in the present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Yukawa theory with a conformal window; Eqs. (1), (2), (7), (10)] The large-N normalization of the scalar sector is inconsistent as written. Action (1) has O(1) scalar kinetic and cubic terms, while the fermion determinant contributes O(N); integrating out fermions from (1) would give V = λ3 φ³/6 + (N/6π)|φ|³, whose flat direction occurs at λ3 = -N/π, not at λ3 = -1/π. Equation (7), however, multiplies both scalar terms by an overall N, whereas Eq. (2) has no N factor. Since the endpoint condition |λ3| = 1/π and the cancellation leading to Eq. (10) depend on these coefficients, the authors must state the large-N scaling of ϕ, λ3bar, and φ (including whether U_eff in Eq. (2) is the total potential or the potential per flavour), and correct Eq. (1) or Eq. (7) accordingly. Without this, the massless pole does not follow from the displayed fundamental action.
  2. [The massless dilaton; after Eq. (10)] The statement that the dilaton is 'truly massless' is stronger than what Eq. (10) establishes. The two-point function is evaluated at leading order in the large-N expansion, with boson loops suppressed in Eq. (7), and the paper does not estimate or discuss 1/N corrections to the inverse propagator. The claim should be qualified as a leading large-N result, or the first correction should be computed; otherwise the massless pole could be lifted by subleading corrections.
  3. [Introduction and Summary; refs. [22], [64], [5]] The central input, the effective potential (2), is quoted from [22] without derivation, and the non-perturbative scaling dimensions and trace anomaly used around Eq. (18) are taken from the unpublished companion [64]. The soft-dilaton theorem used for Eqs. (12) and (18) is also developed in a coauthor's paper [5]. These are not optional context: they supply the flat-direction condition and the normalization of the dilatonic matrix element. The Letter should state precisely which results are imported and either provide their derivation or make the companion paper accessible, so that the 'first principles' claim in the abstract can be assessed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [The massless dilaton; after Fig. 4] The word 'non-perturabtive' in 'to its non-perturabtive infrared value' should be 'non-perturbative'.
  2. [The massive dilaton; near Fig. 6] The sentence 'In the large- and mid-momentum regime' should be 'In the large- and mid-momentum regimes'.
  3. [Eq. (14) and surrounding text] The notation δλ2 is introduced in Eq. (3) as the coefficient of a mass term, but it is also used in Eqs. (4), (14), and (19) with implicit factors of N coming from the large-N scaling. A short statement of the relation between δλ2 and the bare mass perturbation in (1) would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the massless-dilaton pole is a consequence of the input flat endpoint rather than an independent prediction, but the input is a prior published derivation and the paper's propagator, decay-constant, and mass computations are explicit new steps.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the large-N quantum effective potential (2), taken from the authors' earlier published work [22]. Given (2), the flat direction at |λ3|=λcrit_3 is a direct mathematical property, and the massless pole in (10) follows from evaluating the fermion bubble in (8)-(9) at that endpoint; it is a consequence of the stated input and not a circular re-import of the conclusion. The soft-dilaton theorem [5] used to extract the decay constant is a general published result by one coauthor, not a property fitted to this model, and the checks in (17)-(20) compare independently computed combinations. The paper does rely heavily on same-author prior work—[22] for the potential and [64] (in preparation) for the infrared scaling dimension Δφ=1 and trace-anomaly consistency—but these are external (if overlapping) references, not definitions of the target quantities, and no equation is defined in terms of the result it is meant to predict. The most serious issue flagged by a skeptical reader is a normalization gap: Eq. (1) as written has no factor N on the scalar kinetic and cubic terms, while Eq. (7) multiplies the whole scalar action by N; the paper does not spell out the large-N rescaling that makes (7) follow from (1), which would shift the endpoint condition away from λ3=-1/π if the scalar sector is O(1). That is a correctness/derivation gap, not a circularity, so it does not raise the circularity score beyond a minor credit for the unusually heavy self-citation load.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No genuinely new entities are introduced; the dilaton is a known Goldstone boson. The central claim rests on the large-N effective potential and scaling dimensions sourced from the authors' own prior and unpublished work, with no independent machine-checked or external benchmark provided.

free parameters (3)
  • φ0 = arbitrary (vev parametrizing the moduli space)
    The vacuum expectation value of the scalar field is a free parameter of the moduli space at the endpoint, not determined by the microscopic theory.
  • H
    The RG-invariant crossover scale H^2 controls the UV-IR crossover; it is an input scale from the microscopic theory, not fitted.
  • λ3 = |λ3| ≤ π^{-1}
    The exactly marginal cubic coupling parametrizes the line of IR fixed points; its value is a free parameter in the conformal window.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Large-N limit with boson loops suppressed
    The effective action (7) and all correlation functions are computed at leading order in 1/N; the persistence of the flat direction and the massless dilaton beyond leading order is assumed.
  • domain assumption Effective potential (2) with λcrit_3 = 1/π and conformal window from [22]
    The central calculation starts from the quantum critical potential (2) established in the authors' prior work [22]; the paper does not re-derive it.
  • domain assumption Scaling dimensions Δφ^n = n and Δφ = 1
    Used to relate the residue to the decay constant via the soft theorem, and cited to [22,64], with [64] unpublished.
  • domain assumption Soft dilaton theorem ⟨D|O|D⟩ = Δ_O(Δ_O - d)⟨O⟩/F_D^2 from [5]
    Used to derive the universal relation (18); this is a self-cited result by coauthor Zwicky.
  • standard math OPE and point-splitting renormalisation for the condensate
    Standard field-theoretic techniques used to define the fermion condensate (13).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XJW2SJON

@misc{pith2026250200107,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dilaton Physics from Asymptotic Freedom},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XJW2SJON}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00107}
}
read the original abstract

The dilaton is investigated from first principles in an asymptotically free Gross-Neveu-Yukawa theory in three dimensions. In the limit of many fermion flavours, the theory features a finite line of strongly interacting fixed points with continuous quantum phase transitions and a massless Goldstone boson, the dilaton, following spontaneous scale symmetry breaking at its endpoint. Interestingly, we find that the emergence of a vacuum expectation value and a dilaton can be understood as a double-scaling limit. Exploiting the scalar two-point function, we identify the dilaton in the spectrum, compute its decay constant, and obtain universal expressions for the induced dilaton mass in terms of small perturbations. Consistency of findings with soft dilaton theorems is equally established. Implications for spontaneously broken conformal theories are indicated.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fermions and the Renormalisation Group at Large N

    hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    At large N, fermionic quantum field theories have exact effective actions depending only on flavour-singlet fermion bilinears, making the local potential approximation exact and yielding new conformal fixed points.

  2. Light dilaton from top-down holographic confinement with magnetic fluxes

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a two-flux family of top-down holographic confining theories, the lightest scalar is an approximate dilaton with mass about one tenth of the lightest spin-2 confinement scale, over a wide, untuned region of paramet...

  3. Dilaton Effective Field Theory across the Conformal Edge

    hep-lat 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fitting a dilaton EFT with a free exponent Δ to lattice spectra indicates SU(3) N_f=8 is confining (Δ<4) and SU(2) adjoint is infrared conformal (Δ>4).

  4. Gluon Gravitational $ D$-Form Factor: The $\sigma$-Meson as a Dilaton Confronted with Lattice Data II

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    σ-pole residues in gluon D-form factors for π, N, ρ and Δ are consistent with dilaton effective theory predictions within large uncertainties.

  5. Dilatonic states, phase transitions, and criticality in holography

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of holographic examples indicating that a light dilaton appears near critical endpoints of first-order zero-temperature phase transitions, with explicit but lower-dimensional demonstrations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [64]

    In cutoff regularisation, it entails the renormalisation of the scalar mass

    The linear UV divergence of the fermion bubble integral is suppressed in dimensional regularisation. In cutoff regularisation, it entails the renormalisation of the scalar mass

    work page

  2. [22]

    3D Field Theories with Chern--Simons Term for Large $N$ in the Weyl Gauge

    M. Moshe and J. Zinn-Justin, 3D Field Theories with Chern–Simons Term for Large N in the Weyl Gauge , JHEP 01 (2015) 054 [ 1410.0558]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  3. [5]

    C. N. Leung, S. T. Love and W. A. Bardeen, Aspects of Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Gauge Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 323 (1989) 493

    work page 1989

  4. [1]

    As 5 an additional bonus this serves as a consistency check of the fermion condensate per se

    For a fermion mass perturbation (16) with δλ2 = 0, we find m2 DF 2 D = −2 δm ⟨ ¯ψψ⟩ , (20) which equally agrees with (17) once expressed in terms of (16) and substituting the fermion condensate (13). As 5 an additional bonus this serves as a consistency check of the fermion condensate per se. Notice that the cubic term ∼ φ3, added to ensure stability of t...

    work page

  5. [2]

    C. J. Isham, A. Salam and J. A. Strathdee, Broken chiral and conformal symmetry in an effective lagrangian formalism, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 685

    work page 1970

  6. [3]

    C. J. Isham, A. Salam and J. A. Strathdee, Spontaneous breakdown of conformal symmetry , Phys. Lett. B 31 (1970) 300

    1970

  7. [4]

    Zumino, Effective Lagrangians and Broken Symmetries, vol

    B. Zumino, Effective Lagrangians and Broken Symmetries, vol. 2 of 1970 Brandeis University Summer Institute in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 . (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1970), Providence, RI, 1970

    work page 1970

  8. [6]

    Zwicky, QCD with an infrared fixed point and a dilaton, Phys

    R. Zwicky, QCD with an infrared fixed point and a dilaton, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 014048 [ 2312.13761]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 74 references
  1. [7]

    W. A. Bardeen, M. Moshe and M. Bander, Spontaneous Breaking of Scale Invariance and the Ultraviolet Fixed Point in O(N ) Symmetric ϕ6 in Three Dimensions Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1188

    1984

  2. [8]

    W. A. Bardeen and M. Moshe, Phase Structure of the O(N ) Vector Model, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 1372

    1983

  3. [9]

    David, D

    F. David, D. A. Kessler and H. Neuberger, The Bardeen-Moshe-Bander Fixed Point and the Ultraviolet Triviality of ϕ6 in Three Dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 2071

    1984

  4. [10]

    David, D

    F. David, D. A. Kessler and H. Neuberger, A Study of (ϕ2)3 in Three Dimensions at N = ∞, Nucl. Phys. B 257 (1985) 695

    1985

  5. [11]

    G. Eyal, M. Moshe, S. Nishigaki and J. Zinn-Justin, The O(N ) Vector Model in the Large N Limit Revisited: Multicritical Points and Double Scaling Limit , Nucl. Phys. B470 (1996) 369 [ hep-th/9601080]

    1996 arXiv

  6. [12]

    H. Omid, G. W. Semenoff and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Light dilaton in the large N tricritical O(N ) model, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 125017 [ 1605.00750]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [13]

    D. F. Litim, E. Marchais and P. Mati, Fixed points and the spontaneous breaking of scale invariance , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 125006 [ 1702.05749]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [14]

    D. F. Litim and M. J. Trott, Asymptotic Safety of Scalar Field Theories , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 125006 [1810.01678]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Cresswell-Hogg and D

    C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Line of Fixed Points in Gross-Neveu Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 201602 [ 2207.10115]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Cresswell-Hogg and D

    C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Critical fermions with spontaneously broken scale symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) L101701 [ 2212.06815]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [17]

    W. A. Bardeen, K. Higashijima and M. Moshe, Spontaneous Breaking of Scale Invariance in a Supersymmetric Model, Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 437

    1985

  12. [18]

    D. F. Litim, M. C. Mastaler, F. Synatschke-Czerwonka and A. Wipf, Critical Behavior of Supersymmetric 6 O(N ) Models in the Large-N Limit , Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 125009 [ 1107.3011]

    2011 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Heilmann, D

    M. Heilmann, D. F. Litim, F. Synatschke-Czerwonka and A. Wipf, Phases of Supersymmetric O(N ) Theories, Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 105006 [ 1208.5389]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. Giombi, G. Gur-Ari, J. Maldacena and R. Yacoby, The Thermal Free Energy in Large N Chern-Simons-Matter Theories, JHEP 03 (2013) 121 [1211.4843]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [21]

    W. A. Bardeen and M. Moshe, Spontaneous Breaking of Scale Invariance in a D=3 U (N ) Model with Chern-Simons Gauge Fields , JHEP 06 (2014) 113 [1402.4196]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Cresswell-Hogg and D

    C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Scale symmetry breaking and generation of mass at quantum critical points, JHEP 07 (2024) 066 [ 2311.16246]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    G. W. Semenoff and R. A. Stewart, Dilaton in a multicritical 3 + ϵ dimensional parity violating field theory, Phys. Lett. B 853 (2024) 138691 [ 2402.09646]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Cresswell-Hogg and D

    C. Cresswell-Hogg and D. F. Litim, Fermion mass generation without symmetry breaking , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 065014 [ 2406.00100]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [26]

    G. W. Semenoff and R. A. Stewart, Parity-violating marginal deformation of the 3D Gross-Neveu-Thirring model, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 025007 [ 2408.04855]

    2025 arXiv

  20. [27]

    J. R. Ellis, Aspects of conformal symmetry and chirality , Nucl. Phys. B 22 (1970) 478

    1970

  21. [28]

    J. R. Ellis, Phenomenological actions for spontaneously-broken conformal symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 26 (1971) 536

    1971

  22. [29]

    R. J. Crewther, Broken scale invariance in the width of a single dilaton , Phys. Lett. B 33 (1970) 305

    1970

  23. [30]

    R. J. Crewther, Spontaneous breakdown of conformal and chiral invariance , Phys. Rev. D 3 (1971) 3152

    1971

  24. [31]

    Zwicky, The Dilaton Improves Goldstones , 2306.12914

    R. Zwicky, The Dilaton Improves Goldstones , 2306.12914

  25. [32]

    R. J. Crewther and L. C. Tunstall, Origin of ∆I = 1/2 Rule for Kaon Decays: QCD Infrared Fixed Point , 1203.1321

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    R. J. Crewther and L. C. Tunstall, Status of Chiral-Scale Perturbation Theory, PoS CD15 (2015) 132 [1510.01322]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Del Debbio and R

    L. Del Debbio and R. Zwicky, Dilaton and massive hadrons in a conformal phase , JHEP 08 (2022) 007 [2112.11363]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Zwicky, QCD with an infrared fixed point: The pion sector, Phys

    R. Zwicky, QCD with an infrared fixed point: The pion sector, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 034009 [ 2306.06752]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Shifman and R

    M. Shifman and R. Zwicky, Relating β′ ∗ and γ′ Q∗ in the N = 1 SQCD Conformal Window , 2310.16449

    arXiv

  30. [37]

    Hasenfratz and C

    A. Hasenfratz and C. T. Peterson, Infrared fixed point in the massless twelve-flavor SU(3) gauge-fermion system, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 114507 [ 2402.18038]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Lattice Strong Dynamicscollaboration, Light Scalar Meson and Decay Constant in SU(3) Gauge Theory with Eight Dynamical Flavors , 2306.06095

    arXiv

  32. [39]

    Hasenfratz, C

    A. Hasenfratz, C. Rebbi and O. Witzel, Gradient flow step-scaling function for SU(3) with ten fundamental flavors, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 114508 [ 2004.00754]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Fodor, K

    Z. Fodor, K. Holland, J. Kuti, D. Nogradi and C. H. Wong, Extended investigation of the twelve-flavor β-function, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 230 [ 1710.09262]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Chiu, Improved study of the β-function of SU (3) gauge theory with Nf = 10 massless domain-wall fermions, Phys

    T.-W. Chiu, Improved study of the β-function of SU (3) gauge theory with Nf = 10 massless domain-wall fermions, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 014507 [ 1811.01729]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Lattice Strong Dynamicscollaboration, Nonperturbative investigations of SU(3) gauge theory with eight dynamical flavors , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 014509 [1807.08411]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [43]

    LatKMI collaboration, Light flavor-singlet scalars and walking signals in Nf = 8 QCD on the lattice , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 014508 [ 1610.07011]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Del Debbio, B

    L. Del Debbio, B. Lucini, A. Patella, C. Pica and A. Rago, Large volumes and spectroscopy of walking theories, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 054505 [ 1512.08242]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [45]

    LatKMI collaboration, Light composite scalar in eight-flavor QCD on the lattice , Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 111502 [1403.5000]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [46]

    G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Scaling effective Lagrangians in a dense medium , Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 2720

    1991

  40. [47]

    Ma and M

    Y.-L. Ma and M. Rho, Towards the hadron–quark continuity via a topology change in compact stars , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 113 (2020) 103791 [ 1909.05889]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Rho and Y.-L

    M. Rho and Y.-L. Ma, Manifestation of Hidden Symmetries in Baryonic Matter: From Finite Nuclei to Neutron Stars, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36 (2021) 2130012 [2101.07121]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Shao and M

    L.-Q. Shao and M. Rho, An IR Fixed Point in QCD with a Dilaton in Nuclear Dynamics , 2405.07339

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    D. D. Dietrich, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: Predictions for CERN LHC , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 055001 [hep-ph/0505059]

    2005 arXiv

  44. [51]

    W. D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein and W. Skiba, Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider , Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 111802 [0708.1463]

    2008 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning, A Higgslike Dilaton , Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013) 2333 [ 1209.3299]

    2013 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Matsuzaki and K

    S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki, Holographic techni-dilaton at 125 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115004 [1209.2017]

    2012 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Cat` a, R

    O. Cat` a, R. J. Crewther and L. C. Tunstall,Crawling technicolor, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095007 [1803.08513]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Bruggisser, B

    S. Bruggisser, B. von Harling, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Servant, Status of electroweak baryogenesis in minimal composite Higgs , JHEP 08 (2023) 012 [2212.11953]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Appelquist, J

    T. Appelquist, J. Ingoldby and M. Piai, Dilaton Forbidden Dark Matter , 2404.07601

    arXiv

  50. [57]

    Wetterich, Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry, Nucl

    C. Wetterich, Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 302 (1988) 668 [ 1711.03844]

    1988 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Shaposhnikov and D

    M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenhausern, Scale invariance, unimodular gravity and dark energy , Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 187 [ 0809.3395]

    2009 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Shaposhnikov and D

    M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenhausern, Quantum scale invariance, cosmological constant and hierarchy problem, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 162 [ 0809.3406]

    2009 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Csaki, N

    C. Csaki, N. Kaloper, J. Serra and J. Terning, Inflation from Broken Scale Invariance , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 161302 [ 1406.5192]

    2014 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Cacciapaglia, D

    G. Cacciapaglia, D. Y. Cheong, A. Deandrea, W. Isnard and S. C. Park, Composite hybrid inflation: dilaton and 7 waterfall pions , JCAP 10 (2023) 063 [ 2307.01852]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Pomarol, O

    A. Pomarol, O. Pujolas and L. Salas, Holographic conformal transition and light scalars , JHEP 10 (2019) 202 [1905.02653]

    2019 arXiv

  56. [63]

    A. F. Faedo, C. Hoyos, M. Piai, R. Rodgers and J. G. Subils, Light holographic dilatons near critical points , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 126017 [ 2406.04974]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Cresswell-Hogg, D

    C. Cresswell-Hogg, D. F. Litim, and R. Zwicky, in preparation

  58. [66]

    Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2005

    2005

  59. [67]

    Zwicky, A brief Introduction to Dispersion Relations and Analyticity, in Quantum Field Theory at the Limits: from Strong Fields to Heavy Quarks , 10, 2016, 1610.06090, DOI

    R. Zwicky, A brief Introduction to Dispersion Relations and Analyticity, in Quantum Field Theory at the Limits: from Strong Fields to Heavy Quarks , 10, 2016, 1610.06090, DOI

    2016 arXiv

  60. [68]

    K. G. Wilson, Nonlagrangian models of current algebra , Phys. Rev. 179 (1969) 1499

    1969

  61. [69]

    K. G. Wilson, Operator product expansions and anomalous dimensions in the Thirring model , Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1473

    1970

  62. [70]

    Here, instead, several operators are involved, which can lead to different scaling dimensions

    In the case where a single operator contributes to T ρ ρ = O, for the dilaton mass and the decay constant, its scaling dimension must be ∆ O = d − 2 [5]. Here, instead, several operators are involved, which can lead to different scaling dimensions

  63. [71]

    G. K. Karananas and M. Shaposhnikov, CFT data and spontaneously broken conformal invariance, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 045009 [ 1708.02220]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Cuomo, L

    G. Cuomo, L. Rastelli and A. Sharon, Moduli Spaces in CFT: Bootstrap Equation in a Perturbative Example , 2406.02679

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    M. R. Gaberdiel, A. Konechny and C. Schmidt-Colinet, Conformal perturbation theory beyond the leading order , J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 105402 [ 0811.3149]

    2009 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Komargodski and D

    Z. Komargodski and D. Simmons-Duffin, The Random-Bond Ising Model in 2.01 and 3 Dimensions , J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 154001 [ 1603.04444]

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.