Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Black Strings and String Clouds Embedded in Anisotropic Quintessence: Solutions for Scalar Particles and Implications

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An exact cylindrically symmetric anti-de Sitter spacetime with a black string, a cloud of strings, and anisotropic quintessence yields a near-horizon scalar wave function carrying a quintessence-dependent dark phase.

desk verdict Honest, workmanlike exact-solution paper: the metric and Heun solution check out, but the 'dark phase' is an order-of-magnitude guess bolted onto the physics by an ad hoc calibration of NQ. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04894 v1 pith:LL3S4QTP submitted 2025-02-07 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Maria de Lourdes Deglmann , Leonardo G. Barbosa , Celso de Camargo Barros Jr This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 83C5783C1583C75 PACS 04.20.Jb04.70.-s95.36.+x
keywords blackstringsquintessencestringcloudsKlein-GordonequationconfluentHeunfunctionsanti-deSitterspacetimedarkphaseeventhorizon
topics Dark Energy
open problems Dark Energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs an exact solution of Einstein's equations describing a cylindrically symmetric black string in anti-de Sitter spacetime, surrounded by a cloud of strings and an anisotropic quintessence fluid. The resulting metric is $$A(\rho)=a+\frac{\$rho^{2}$}{$l^{2}$}-\frac{\rho_S}{\rho}+N_Q\$rho^{{2\alpha_Q}}$,$$ where $a$ encodes the string-cloud intensity, $\rho_S$ is a Schwarzschild-like radius, and $N_Q$ is the quintessence amplitude. The authors solve the Klein-Gordon equation for a spin-0 particle near the event horizon using confluent Heun functions and find the radial wave function behaves as $(x-1)^{\gamma/2}$ with $\gamma=i\,\epsilon\rho_+/\beta_+$. Because $N_Q$ enters the phase of this wave function in a factorized way, the paper proposes a 'dark phase' as a possible observational imprint of dark energy on quantum systems. If the claim holds, dark energy is not only a cosmological background but also a local, phase-level influence on matter near compact cylindrical sources.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the metric function $A(\rho)$ of (18), obtained by combining the Einstein-tensor components (3)-(4) with the conserved energy-momentum tensor $T^t_t=T^\rho_\rho=\rho_Q+a/\rho^2$, $T^\phi_\phi=T^z_z=\alpha_Q\rho_Q$. This turns the field equations into the nonhomogeneous Cauchy-Euler equation (17), whose homogeneous part supplies the $\rho_S/\rho$ and $N_Q\rho^{2\alpha_Q}$ terms and whose particular solution supplies the constant cloud term and the AdS term $\rho^2/l^2$. For the quantum calculation, the Klein-Gordon radial equation is put in Liouville normal form (59) with effective potential (60); near the horizon $A(x)\simeq\beta_+(x-1)$, with $\beta_+=\rho_+\,dA/d\rho|_{\rho_+}$, and the normal equation matches the confluent Heun equation (a second-order linear ODE with regular singular points at $0$ and $1$ and an irregular singularity at infinity). The Heun parameters (67), especially $\gamma=\pm i\,2\epsilon\rho_+/\beta_+$, encode the geometry, and the factorization of the $N_Q$-dependent part into $\delta_{D\pm}$ produces the dark phase.

What would settle it

A direct check is to integrate the Klein-Gordon equation numerically in the full metric (18), without the near-horizon linearization $A\simeq\beta_+(x-1)$, and compare the phase of the radial function with the predicted $\gamma=i\,\epsilon\rho_+/\beta_+$: a different logarithmic exponent would falsify the Heun-based claim. A second check is astrophysical: an independent determination of $N_Q$ from large-scale-structure or dark-energy data that disagrees with eq. (30) by more than an order of magnitude would invalidate the quantitative dark-phase prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the combined spacetime is an exact solution: equations (15)-(17) reduce Einstein's equations to a nonhomogeneous Cauchy-Euler equation whose solution is the metric function in (18), with energy density $\rho_Q=(2\alpha_Q+1)N_Q\rho^{2\alpha_Q-2}/(8\pi G/c^4)$ and pressures $p_\phi=p_z=-\alpha_Q\rho_Q$. The horizon analysis shows the cloud parameter $a$ controls the horizon size; in the physically relevant regime the horizon radius is $\rho_+\approx\rho_S/a$, and removing the cloud makes $\rho_+$ grow drastically. For the quantum sector, the paper claims that a spin-0 particle near the horizon has a radial wave function $$R(x)=\bigl(\rho_+^2\beta_+\bigr)^{-1/2}$x^{{(\beta-1)/2}}$(x-1)^{\gamma/2}\bigl[c_1\,\mathrm{HeunC}(\$\alpha$,\$\beta$,\gamma,\delta,\eta;x)+$c_2x^{{-\beta}}$\mathrm{HeunC}(\$\alpha$,-\$\beta$,\gamma,\delta,\eta;x)\bigr],$$ whose leading near-horizon behavior is $(x-1)^{\gamma/2}$, so the real part oscillates as $\cos[(\epsilon\rho_+/\beta_+)\ln(x-1)]$. The quintessence dependence of the phase is isolated in the 'dark phase' $\delta_{D\pm}$, defined in eq. (75), making dark energy a candidate source of a measurable quantum phase shift.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the calibration in eq. (30), which fixes $N_Q$ by equating the total quintessence energy of a cylindrical model universe to the $\Lambda$CDM dark-energy content $E_{DE}\approx2\times10^{71}$ J with $|l|\approx\rho_{\mathrm{obs}}=3.8\times10^{26}$ m; if that cylindrical-volume conversion or the input $E_{DE}$ is wrong, $N_Q$ changes by orders of magnitude and the dark-phase size changes with it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The metric (18) is an exact solution, so the horizon and wave-function results follow from a single self-consistent spacetime model containing a black string, a string cloud, and quintessence.
  • For $\alpha_Q\ge 1/2$ and typical parameters, the horizon radius is approximately $\rho_S/a$: stronger string clouds shrink the horizon, while cloudless configurations have much larger horizons.
  • Except near $\alpha_Q=0$, the quintessence term $N_Q\rho^{2\alpha_Q}$ is negligible until distances comparable to the observable-universe radius, so in this model dark energy's backreaction is a large-scale effect.
  • Near the event horizon, scalar wave functions oscillate as $\cos[(\epsilon\rho_+/\beta_+)\ln(x-1)]$, meaning the black-string spacetime acts as a logarithmic phase shifter for quantum matter.
  • The quintessence contribution to the wave function is isolated in the dark phase $\delta_{D\pm}$, which is the paper's concrete candidate observable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the dark phase scales with $N_Q\rho_S/a^2$, a precise measurement of the phase of scalar or atomic waves near a massive cylindrical object could constrain $N_Q$ independently of cosmology; the paper does not develop this experimental route.
  • Editorial inference: the conclusion that quintessence is negligible except near $\alpha_Q=0$ rests on the cylindrical-volume calibration in eq. (30); a different mapping from the spherical observable universe to a cylinder would rescale $N_Q$ and could make quintessence relevant at smaller radii.
  • Editorial inference: the paper derives the wave solution only in the near-horizon region $x\approx1$ (Section 6.2) and defers full radial solutions to future work, so the dark phase is established as a local near-horizon effect rather than a complete global prediction.
  • Editorial inference: the same confluent-Heun construction should extend to rotating black strings, other values of $\alpha_Q$, and regions far from the horizon; those extensions would turn the dark phase into a full scattering or quasinormal-mode observable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a cylindrically symmetric AdS spacetime containing a black string, a cloud of strings, and an anisotropic quintessence fluid. The authors solve the Einstein equations to obtain the metric function A(ρ)=a+ρ²/l²−ρ_S/ρ+N_Qρ^{2α_Q}, analyze event-horizon formation for selected values of the state parameter α_Q, and reduce the Klein-Gordon equation for a spin-0 particle near the horizon to a confluent Heun equation. They then define a quintessence-induced phase, the "dark phase," and use a calibration of N_Q to the observed dark-energy density to estimate its magnitude.

Significance. The exact metric construction is a legitimate extension of the black-string-plus-quintessence literature, and the Heun-function solution is internally consistent: substituting A(ρ) from Eq. (18) into Eqs. (15)-(16) reproduces the stated energy density (21), and the Heun parameters in Eq. (67) are compatible with the near-horizon form of the effective potential. The horizon analysis for α_Q=0,1/2,1 is systematic. However, the quantitative physical conclusions—especially the magnitude and observability of the "dark phase"—are not derived from the theory alone; they rest on an external calibration that can change the results by orders of magnitude. The paper should be revised to separate the exact solution and the Heun solution from the calibration-dependent estimates.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (17)] The derivation of the Cauchy-Euler equation for A(ρ) drops the (1−α_Q)Λ term. Subtracting α_Q times Eq. (15) from Eq. (16) and multiplying by 2ρ² yields ρ²A''+2(1−α_Q)ρA'−2α_QA+2(1−α_Q)Λρ²=−(16πG/c⁴)α_Qa, not Eq. (17) as printed. As printed, Eq. (17) does not admit the particular solution c₁+ρ²/l². The final metric (18) does satisfy the original field equations, so the error is a derivation defect that can be repaired, but it must be corrected before publication.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eqs. (28)-(30)] The calibration of N_Q by equating the integrated quintessence energy in a cylinder of radius ρ_obs and height 2ρ_obs to the ΛCDM dark-energy content E_DE is an input assumption, not a prediction. Every quantitative statement downstream—N_Q≈4.1×10⁻⁵³ m⁻² in Eq. (26), the claim that quintessence is negligible except near α_Q≈0, and the dark-phase magnitude in Eq. (75)—scales with this choice. A different volume conversion or a different E_DE changes N_Q by orders of magnitude. Moreover, the spacetime already contains a cosmological constant Λ=−3/l² with a similar geometric role; equating quintessence to the full dark-energy budget double-counts dark energy unless the Λ term is ignored. The authors should either derive N_Q from a boundary condition within the model or clearly present the numerical results as illustrations of a chosen calibration.
  3. [Section 6.3, Eq. (75)] The "dark phase" δD± is linear in N_Q, and since N_Q is fixed by the ad hoc Eq. (30), the dark phase is not a robust, falsifiable prediction. The paper also does not specify a concrete observational or experimental setup that would isolate a phase of a scalar wave function near a black-string horizon. I recommend rephrasing the claims to state that the phase shift is a theoretical quantity whose magnitude is set by an external calibration, not a demonstrated observable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.3, Notation] The symbol N_Q is used for both the integration constant in A(ρ) and the rescaled coefficient N_Q = N_Q/(8πG/c⁴). This is confusing because the two quantities have different dimensions; please introduce a distinct symbol for the rescaled coefficient.
  2. [Section 6.3, Eq. (75)] The bracket in δD± appears to have a dimensional inconsistency: the first term ϵρ_S/a is missing a factor of 1/a if δD± is to be the N_Q-dependent part of the phase derived from β_+. Please check the expansion leading to Eq. (75).
  3. [Section 6.2, Eqs. (70)-(71)] The transition from x^{β/2} to exp[±β(x−1)/2] near x=1 is inaccurate; for x→1, x^{β/2}≈1+(β/2)(x−1), not an exponential. The exponential form is a valid approximation only in a different regime, so the presentation should be clarified.
  4. [Figure 2 Caption] The caption says "observable universe radius of l=ρ_obs," conflating the AdS radius l with the cylinder radius ρ_obs. The text later assumes |l|≳ρ_obs, not equality; the caption should be corrected.
  5. [Section 4.1, Table 2] The text states that typical values of a range from 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁵, but the table includes entries as large as 10⁰. Please reconcile the statement with the table or explain that the range is only for the objects listed in the first part of the table.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the metric and Heun solution are self-contained, and the NQ calibration is an external input rather than a prediction that reduces to its own input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The metric A(rho)=a+rho^2/l^2-rho_S/rho+NQ rho^(2 alpha_Q) (eq. 18) is obtained by solving the Einstein equations (15)-(16) for the stated energy-momentum tensors; the consistency check (21) reproduces the quintessence density from A(rho), and the Heun parameters (67) match the Liouville-normal form (B.5)-(B.6) of the confluent Heun equation. Prior work is cited for the metric ansatz [26] and string clouds [29], but these are external sources, not self-citations; the authors' own earlier papers are cited only as background examples of quantum systems in curved spacetimes and carry no load-bearing weight here. The calibration of NQ in eq. (30) fixes an integration constant by equating the integrated quintessence energy of a cylindrical model to the observed Lambda-CDM dark-energy content. That is an external input designed to give order-of-magnitude estimates, not a quantity the paper claims to predict from first principles. Consequently, the 'dark phase' in eq. (75), being linear in NQ, inherits the numerical value of this calibration, but it is not identical to the input nor statistically forced by it: it is a derived phase shift in a new physical setting (a spin-0 particle near a black-string horizon). A separate, non-circular correctness concern is that eq. (17) omits the 2 Lambda (1-alpha_Q) rho^2 term needed to justify the rho^2/l^2 particular solution, and calibrating NQ to the full dark-energy budget while retaining Lambda=-3/l^2 with l=rho_obs would double-count dark energy; these issues are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The core metric solution rests on standard Einstein equations plus the Kiselev and Letelier energy-momentum ansatze. The quantitative implications rest on an ad hoc calibration of NQ to ΛCDM dark energy, and the proposed dark phase is a new named quantity without independent evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • NQ (quintessence strength) = 8.95 at αQ=0; 2.35e-26 m^-1 at αQ=1/2; 6.2e-53 m^-2 at αQ→1
    Estimated by equating the total quintessence energy of the cylindrical model to the ΛCDM dark energy content (eq. 30). This is a calibration, not a derivation.
  • a (dimensionless string cloud parameter) = Ranges from 10^-12 to 10^0 for different objects in Table 2, e.g., 3.0e-5 for the Sun
    Obtained by transposing spherical masses to equivalent cylinders; an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a model prediction.
  • αQ (quintessence state parameter) = Varied in the interval (0,1)
    Free equation-of-state parameter controlling the anisotropy; the paper scans over it.
  • l (AdS radius) = 3.8e26 m in the plots
    Set equal to the observable-universe radius for numerical estimates; other values would alter the horizon approximations.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Einstein field equations with a cosmological constant, G_μν + Λ g_μν = (8πG/c⁴) T_μν.
    The governing equations; used throughout Section 3.
  • domain assumption The line element has the cylindrical AdS black-string form given in eq. (1).
    The ansatz restricts the spacetime to cylindrically symmetric, static configurations.
  • domain assumption The quintessence fluid has the anisotropic Kiselev form T^t_t=T^ρ_ρ=ρQ, T^φ_φ=T^z_z=αQρQ.
    Adopted from Kiselev [18] and Ali et al. [26]; this algebraic form is not derived from a scalar-field action.
  • domain assumption The cloud of strings has T^t_t=T^ρ_ρ=a/ρ² and T^φ_φ=T^z_z=0.
    Standard Letelier cloud-of-strings form; introduced in Section 2.1.1.
  • domain assumption Near the horizon, A(ρ) is approximated by β+(x-1) and the confluent Heun function is approximated by 1.
    Used in Section 6.2 to obtain the leading behavior of the scalar wave function.
  • ad hoc to paper The total quintessence energy in the cylindrical model is set equal to the ΛCDM dark energy content of the observable universe.
    This calibration in eq. (30) fixes NQ and controls the size of the dark phase; it is an input assumption specific to this paper.
invented entities (1)
  • dark phase (δD±)
    purpose: Packages the NQ-dependent correction to the near-horizon scalar wave function as a potentially observable quantity.
    The paper provides no measurement protocol, predicted observable signature, or independent handle. The phase magnitude is set by the calibrated NQ and is extremely small in the paper's own examples.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black Strings and String Clouds Embedded in Anisotropic Quintessence: Solutions for Scalar Particles and Implications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LL3S4QTP

@misc{pith2026250204894,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black Strings and String Clouds Embedded in Anisotropic Quintessence: Solutions for Scalar Particles and Implications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LL3S4QTP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04894}
}
abstract

We analyze the spacetime metric associated with a black string surrounded by a cloud of strings and an anisotropic fluid of quintessence in cylindrically symmetric AdS spacetime. We solve Einstein's equation to obtain the explicit form of the metric, investigate typical values for its parameters, and determine their role in the event horizon formation. Within our findings, we show that the intensity of the cloud of strings regulates the size of the event horizon and, when the cloud is absent, the horizon increases drastically for larger values of the quintessence's state parameter $\alpha_{Q}$. Additionally, the metric shows that, unless $\alpha_{Q}$ is close to its lower bound, the contribution from the quintessence fluid is only significant at large distances from the black string. Finally, to explore the quantum implications of this dark energy candidate, we use the confluent Heun function to solve the Klein-Gordon equation for a spin-0 particle near the event horizon. Our results indicate that the presence of quintessence alters the particle's radial wave function. This modification, in principle, could give rise to an observable that we termed as \enquote{dark phase}.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04894 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Logarithmic plot of the quintessence parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The contribution of the quintessence term, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Plot of A(ρ) for different values of a. In this figure, αQ = 0, ρS = 102 m, l = ρobs. = 3.8 × 1026 m, and NQ = 8.95. 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 log 30 20 10 0 10 20 A( ) S = 0 S = 5 S = 10 S = 50 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A(ρ) for different values of the quintessence fraction ΩQ. The other parameters were set as a = 1, ρS = 10 m, l = ρobs. = 3.8 × 1026 m. In the left image, we have the case of αQ = 0, while on the right αQ = 0.02. Note that any small increase in the value of αQ causes t…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ρ+/ρS for αQ = 0 and for NQ ∈ (1, 10). On the left, we have a ∈ (10−6 , 10−3 ), while on the right a ∈ (10−3 , 101 ). where Ξ = 1 2     l 2 r 27ρS 2 +  18NQ a l2 − 4NQ 3 l 4  ρS − NQ 2 a 2 l 4 + 4 a 3 l 2 3 3/2 + 3l 2ρS + NQ l 4 a 3 − 2 NQ 3 l 6 27 # . While the …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Logarithmic plot of the event horizon radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plot of the real part of (x − 1)γ/2 for αQ = 0 (left) and αQ = 1/2 (right). In the left image, where αQ = 0, we considered ρS = 103 m, a = 10−2 , NQ = 8.95. In the right, when αQ = 1/2, we used ρS = 103 m, a = 101 , and NQ = 2.35 × 10−26 m−1 . The values of NQ follow f…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess, et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an ac- celerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009–1038. arXiv:astro-ph/9805201, doi:10.1086/300499

    arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Red- shift Supernovae, Astrophys

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Red- shift Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565–586.arXiv:astro-ph/ 9812133, doi:10.1086/307221

    doi:10.1086/307221 1999

  3. [3]

    E. J. COPELAND, M. SAMI, S. TSUJIKAWA, Dynamics of dark en- ergy, International Journal of Modern Physics D 15 (11) (2006) 1753–

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Amendola, S

    L. Amendola, S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations, Cambridge University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    P. J. Steinhardt, A quintessential introduction to dark energy, Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathe- matical, PhysicalandEngineeringSciences361(1812)(2003)2497–2513. doi:10.1098/rsta.2003.1290

    work page arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Einstein, Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Rel- ativity, Sitzungsber

    A. Einstein, Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Rel- ativity, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ) 1917 (1917) 142–152

    work page 1917

  7. [7]

    DESI Collaboration, DESI 2024 III: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.03000arXiv: 2404.03000, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.03000. 33

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.03000 2024

  8. [8]

    DESI Collaboration, DESI 2024 IV: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.03001arXiv: 2404.03001, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2404.03001

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.03001 2024

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    DESI Collaboration, DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.03002 arXiv:2404.03002, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2404.03002

    2024 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, P. J. Steinhardt, Cosmological imprint of an energy component with general equation of state, Physical Review Let- ters 80 (8) (1998) 1582–1585.doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.1582

    1998 doi

  3. [11]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347–356. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.347

    1981 doi

  4. [12]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99–102. doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(80)90670-X

    1980

  5. [13]

    A. D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible So- lution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primor- dial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389–393. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(82)91219-9

    1982 doi

  6. [14]

    M. W. Hossain, R. Myrzakulov, M. Sami, E. N. Saridakis, Unification of inflation and dark energy à la quintessential inflation, International Journal of Modern Physics D 24 (05) (2015) 1530014.doi:10.1142/ s0218271815300141

    2015

  7. [15]

    P. M. Sá, Triple unification of inflation, dark energy, and dark matter in two-scalar-field cosmology, Physical Review D 102 (10) (2020) 103519. doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.103519

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    Jiménez-Aguilar, A unified model of inflation and dark energy based on the holographic spacetime foam, Physics of the Dark Universe 40 (2023) 101229

    D. Jiménez-Aguilar, A unified model of inflation and dark energy based on the holographic spacetime foam, Physics of the Dark Universe 40 (2023) 101229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2023.101229. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2212686423000638 34

    2023

  9. [17]

    Capozziello, S

    S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, S. Odintsov, Unified phantom cosmology: In- flation, dark energy and dark matter under the same standard, Physics Letters B 632 (5–6) (2006) 597–604.doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005. 11.012

    2006 doi

  10. [18]

    V. V. Kiselev, Quintessence and black holes, Classical and Quantum Gravity 20 (6) (2003) 1187–1197.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/6/310

    2003 doi

  11. [19]

    Saadati, F

    R. Saadati, F. Shojai, Thin shell collapse in kiselev geometry, Classical andQuantumGravity38(13)(2021)135025. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ abfed5

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    J. d. M. Toledo, V. B. Bezerra, Black holes with cloud of strings and quintessenceinlovelockgravity, TheEuropeanPhysicalJournalC78(7) (Jun. 2018). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6001-z

    2018 doi

  13. [22]

    Javed, D

    F. Javed, D. Arora, M. Yasir, H. Chaudhary, G. Mustafa, X. Tiecheng, F. Atamurotov, Impact of chaplygin-like equation of state on joule–thomson expansion and tidal forces of ads black holes, Physics of the Dark Universe (2024) 101654doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101654

    2024

  14. [23]

    Chaudhary, M

    S. Chaudhary, M. D. Sultan, A. Malik, A. ur Rehman, A. Övgün, A. A. Ghfar, Images and stability of black hole with cloud of strings and quintessence in egup framework, Nuclear Physics B 1006 (2024) 116635. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116635

    2024

  15. [24]

    Zahid, F

    M. Zahid, F. Sarikulov, C. Shen, S. Ahmedov, J. Rayimbaev, Shadow of rotating black holes surrounded by dark fluid with chaplygin-like equa- tion of state and constraints from eht results, Classical and Quantum Gravity 41 (20) (2024) 205004.doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad721f

    2024 doi

  16. [25]

    Toshmatov, Z

    B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchlík, B. Ahmedov, Rotating black hole solutions with quintessential energy, The European Physical Journal Plus 132 (2) (Feb. 2017). doi:10.1140/epjp/i2017-11373-4. 35

    2017 doi

  17. [26]

    M. S. Ali, F. Ahmed, S. G. Ghosh, Black string surrounded by a static anisotropic quintessence fluid, Annals of Physics 412 (2020) 168024. doi:10.1016/j.aop.2019.168024

    2020

  18. [27]

    J. P. Lemos, Three dimensional black holes and cylindrical general relativity, Physics Letters B 353 (1) (1995) 46–51. doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(95)00533-q

    1995

  19. [28]

    J. P. S. Lemos, V. T. Zanchin, Rotating charged black strings and three- dimensional black holes, Physical Review D 54 (6) (1996) 3840–3853. doi:10.1103/physrevd.54.3840

    1996 doi

  20. [29]

    P. S. Letelier, Clouds of strings in general relativity, Physical Review D 20 (6) (1979) 1294–1302.doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.1294

    1979 doi

  21. [30]

    Parker, One-Electron Atom in Curved Space-Time, Phys

    L. Parker, One-Electron Atom in Curved Space-Time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (23) (1980) 1559.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1559

    1980 doi

  22. [32]

    L. C. N. Santos, C. C. Barros Jr., Scalar bosons under the influence of noninertial effects in the cosmic string spacetime, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (3) (2017) 186. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4732-x

    2017 doi

  23. [33]

    R. L. L. Vitória, K. Bakke, Rotating effects on the scalar field in the cosmic string spacetime, in the spacetime with space-like dislocation and in the spacetime with a spiral dislocation, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (3) (2018)

    2018

  24. [34]

    S. Chandrasekhar, The solution of dirac’s equation in kerr geometry, ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondon.A.MathematicalandPhysi- cal Sciences 349 (1659) (1976) 571–575.doi:10.1098/rspa.1976.0090

    1976

  25. [35]

    Elizalde, Series solutions for the klein-gordon equation in schwarzschild space-time, Physical review D: Particles and fields 36 (1987) 1269–1272

    E. Elizalde, Series solutions for the klein-gordon equation in schwarzschild space-time, Physical review D: Particles and fields 36 (1987) 1269–1272. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.36.1269. 36

    1987 doi

  26. [36]

    Sedaghatnia, H

    P. Sedaghatnia, H. Hassanabadi, F. Ahmed, Dirac fermions in Som–Raychaudhuri space-time with scalar and vector potential and the energy momentum distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (6) (2019) 541. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7051-6

    2019 doi

  27. [37]

    Guvendi, S

    A. Guvendi, S. Zare, H. Hassanabadi, Exact solution for a fermion–antifermion system with Cornell type nonminimal coupling in the topological defect-generated spacetime, Phys. Dark Univ. 38 (2022) 101133. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101133

    2022

  28. [38]

    R. L. L. Vitória, K. Bakke, On the interaction of the scalar field with a Coulomb-type potential in a spacetime with a screw dislocation and the Aharonov-Bohm effect for bound states, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 (11) (2018) 490. doi:10.1140/epjp/i2018-12310-9

    2018 doi

  29. [39]

    Maniccia, G

    G. Maniccia, G. Montani, S. Antonini, QFT in curved spacetime from quantum gravity: Proper WKB decomposition of the gravitational com- ponent, Phys. Rev. D 107 (6) (2023) L061901. arXiv:2302.10832, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L061901

    2023 arXiv

  30. [40]

    L. C. N. Santos, C. C. Barros Jr., Rotational effects on the Casimir energy in the space–time with one extra compactified dimension, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (20) (2018) 1850122. doi:10.1142/ S0217751X18501221

    2018

  31. [41]

    E. O. Pinho, C. C. Barros Jr., Spin-0 bosons near rotating stars, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (8) (2023) 745. doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-11907-y

    2023 doi

  32. [42]

    Ahmed, Gravitational field effects produced by topologically non- trivial rotating space–time under magnetic and quantum flux fields on quantum oscillator, Int

    F. Ahmed, Gravitational field effects produced by topologically non- trivial rotating space–time under magnetic and quantum flux fields on quantum oscillator, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37 (28n29) (2022) 2250186. doi:10.1142/S0217751X2250186X

    2022 doi

  33. [43]

    Ahmed, Klein–Gordon oscillator with magnetic and quantum flux fields in non-trivial topological space-time, Commun

    F. Ahmed, Klein–Gordon oscillator with magnetic and quantum flux fields in non-trivial topological space-time, Commun. Theor. Phys. 75 (2) (2023) 025202.doi:10.1088/1572-9494/aca650

    2023 doi

  34. [44]

    L. C. N. Santos, C. E. Mota, C. C. Barros Jr., Klein–Gordon Oscillator in a Topologically Nontrivial Space-Time, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2019 (2019) 2729352. doi:10.1155/2019/2729352. 37

    2019 doi

  35. [45]

    Yang, Z.-W

    Y. Yang, Z.-W. Long, Q.-K. Ran, H. Chen, Z.-L. Zhao, C.-Y. Long, The generalized Klein–Gordon oscillator with position-dependent mass in a particular Gödel-type space–time, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36 (03) (2021) 2150023. arXiv:2106.12225, doi:10.1142/S0217751X21500238

    2021 arXiv

  36. [46]

    A. R. Soares, R. L. L. Vitória, H. Aounallah, On the Klein–Gordon os- cillator in topologically charged Ellis–Bronnikov-type wormhole space- time, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (9) (2021) 966. doi:10.1140/epjp/ s13360-021-01965-0

    2021 doi

  37. [47]

    T. I. Rouabhia, A. Boumali, H. Hassanabadi, Effect of the Acceler- ation of the Rindler Spacetime on the Statistical Properties of the Klein–Gordon Oscillator in One Dimension, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 20 (2) (2023) 112–119.doi:10.1134/S154747712302019X

    2023 doi

  38. [48]

    Ronveaux, F

    A. Ronveaux, F. M. Arscott, Heun’s differential equations, Clarendon Press, 1995

    1995

  39. [49]

    Olver, Asymptotics and special functions, AK Peters/CRC Press, 1997

    F. Olver, Asymptotics and special functions, AK Peters/CRC Press, 1997

    1997

  40. [50]

    Olver, N

    F. Olver, N. I. of Standards, T. (U.S.), NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions Hardback and CD-ROM, Cambridge University Press, 2010. URL https://books.google.com.br/books?id=3I15Ph1Qf38C

    2010

  41. [51]

    Hortaçsu, Heun functions and some of their applications in physics, Advances in High Energy Physics 2018 (2018) 1–14

    M. Hortaçsu, Heun functions and some of their applications in physics, Advances in High Energy Physics 2018 (2018) 1–14. doi:10.1155/ 2018/8621573

    2018

  42. [52]

    E. S. Cheb-Terrab, Solutions for the general, confluent and biconfluent heun equations and their connection with abel equations, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 37 (42) (2004) 9923–9949.doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/37/42/007

    2004 doi

  43. [53]

    Tiesinga, P

    E. Tiesinga, P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, B. N. Taylor, The 2022 codata recommended values of the fundamental physical constants, Database developed by J. Baker, M. Douma, and S. Kotochigova. Available at https://physics.nist.gov/constants (2024). 38

    2024

  44. [54]

    Davidson, R

    K. Davidson, R. A. Fesen, Recent developments concerning the crab nebula, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 23 (1) (1985) 119–146. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001003

    1985

  45. [55]

    J. J. Hester, The crab nebula: An astrophysical chimera, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 46 (1) (2008) 127–155.doi:10.1146/ annurev.astro.45.051806.110608

    2008 arXiv

  46. [56]

    Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  47. [57]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb8db

    M.Joyce, S.-C.Leung, L.Molnár, M.Ireland, C.Kobayashi, K.Nomoto, Standing on the shoulders of giants: New mass and distance estimates for betelgeuse through combined evolutionary, asteroseismic, and hy- drodynamic simulations with mesa, The Astrophysical Journal 902 (1) (2020)...

    2020 doi

  48. [58]

    Shultz, G

    M. Shultz, G. A. Wade, V. Petit, J. Grunhut, C. Neiner, D. Hanes, An observational evaluation of magnetic confinement in the winds of ba supergiants, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 438 (2) (2013) 1114–1126. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2260

    2013 doi

  49. [59]

    E. K. Baines, J. T. Armstrong, H. R. Schmitt, R. T. Zavala, J. A. Ben- son, D. J. Hutter, C. Tycner, G. T. v. Belle, Fundamental parameters of 87 stars from the navy precision optical interferometer, The Astro- nomical Journal 155 (1) (2017) 30.doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa9d8b

    2017 doi

  50. [60]

    Kervella, F

    P. Kervella, F. Thevenin, C. Lovis, Proxima’s orbit around alpha cen- tauri, Astronomy and Astrophysics 598 (2017) L7. doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/201629930

    2017

  51. [61]

    J. G. Cohen, A. Ryzhov, The dynamics of the m87 globular cluster system, The Astrophysical Journal 486 (1) (1997) 230–241. doi:10. 1086/304518

    1997

  52. [62]

    V. M. Kalari, E. P. Horch, R. Salinas, J. S. Vink, M. Andersen, J. M. Bestenlehner, M. Rubio, Resolving the core of r136 in the optical, The Astrophysical Journal 935 (2) (2022) 162. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ ac8424. 39

    2022 doi

  53. [63]

    S. A. Brands, A. de Koter, J. M. Bestenlehner, P. A. Crowther, J. O. Sundqvist, J. Puls, S. M. Caballero-Nieves, M. Abdul-Masih, F. A. Driessen, M. García, S. Geen, G. Gräfener, C. Hawcroft, L. Kaper, Z. Keszthelyi, N. Langer, H. Sana, F. R. N. Schneider, T. Shenar, J. S. Vink...

    2022 doi

  54. [64]

    S. O. Kepler, S. J. Kleinman, A. Nitta, D. Koester, B. G. Castanheira, O. Giovannini, A. F. M. Costa, L. Althaus, White dwarf mass distri- bution in the sdss: White dwarf mass distribution in the sdss, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 375 (4) (2007) 1315–1324....

    2007

  55. [65]

    H. L. Shipman, Masses and radii of white-dwarf stars. iii. results for 110 hydrogen-rich and 28 helium-rich stars, The Astrophysical Journal 228 (1979) 240–256

    1979

  56. [66]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2013 results. xvi. cosmological param- eters, Astronomy and Astrophysics 571 (2014) A16. doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/201321591

    2014

  57. [67]

    Titchmarsh, Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second-order Differential Equations, no

    E. Titchmarsh, Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second-order Differential Equations, no. pt. 1 in Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second-order Differential Equations, Clarendon Press, 1962. URL https://books.google.com.br/books?id=jv9QAAAAMAAJ 40

    1962

  58. [175]

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5658-7

    doi

  59. [1935]

    doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.