Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

UPCORE: Utility-Preserving Coreset Selection for Balanced Unlearning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.15082 v2 pith:NY6CCETL submitted 2025-02-20 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords modelpointsunlearningupcorebalancecoresetdataforget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

User specifications or legal frameworks often require information to be removed from pretrained models, including large language models (LLMs). This requires deleting or "forgetting" a set of data points from an already-trained model, which typically degrades its performance on other data points. Thus, a balance must be struck between removing information and keeping the model's other abilities intact, with a failure to balance this trade-off leading to poor deletion or an unusable model. To this end, we propose UPCORE (Utility-Preserving Coreset Selection), a method-agnostic data selection framework for mitigating collateral damage during unlearning. Finding that the model damage is correlated with the variance of the model's representations on the forget set, we selectively prune the forget set to remove outliers, thereby minimizing model degradation after unlearning. Across three standard unlearning methods, UPCORE consistently achieves a superior balance between the competing objectives of deletion efficacy and model preservation. To better evaluate this trade-off, we introduce a new metric, measuring the area-under-the-curve (AUC) across standard metrics. Our results show that UPCORE improves both standard metrics and AUC, benefiting from positive transfer between the coreset and pruned points while reducing negative transfer from the forget set to points outside of it.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Mechanistic Perspective and Circuit-Guided Difficulty Metric for Unlearning

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A circuit-similarity score predicts which samples an LLM unlearning method will fail to erase, with hard samples relying on deeper, output-facing pathways.

  2. Unlearning Sensitive Information in Multimodal LLMs: Benchmark and Attack-Defense Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UnLOK-VQA adds rephrase and neighborhood samples to OK-VQA to measure generalization and specificity of multimodal unlearning, and its evaluation shows that hiding answer tokens in hidden states beats other deletion o...

  3. SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new taxonomy for LLM unlearning distinguishes removal-intended from suppression-intended methods, and argues that gradient ascent methods functionally behave like suppression.

Pith tools