REVIEW 3 cited by
UPCORE: Utility-Preserving Coreset Selection for Balanced Unlearning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
User specifications or legal frameworks often require information to be removed from pretrained models, including large language models (LLMs). This requires deleting or "forgetting" a set of data points from an already-trained model, which typically degrades its performance on other data points. Thus, a balance must be struck between removing information and keeping the model's other abilities intact, with a failure to balance this trade-off leading to poor deletion or an unusable model. To this end, we propose UPCORE (Utility-Preserving Coreset Selection), a method-agnostic data selection framework for mitigating collateral damage during unlearning. Finding that the model damage is correlated with the variance of the model's representations on the forget set, we selectively prune the forget set to remove outliers, thereby minimizing model degradation after unlearning. Across three standard unlearning methods, UPCORE consistently achieves a superior balance between the competing objectives of deletion efficacy and model preservation. To better evaluate this trade-off, we introduce a new metric, measuring the area-under-the-curve (AUC) across standard metrics. Our results show that UPCORE improves both standard metrics and AUC, benefiting from positive transfer between the coreset and pruned points while reducing negative transfer from the forget set to points outside of it.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A Mechanistic Perspective and Circuit-Guided Difficulty Metric for Unlearning
A circuit-similarity score predicts which samples an LLM unlearning method will fail to erase, with hard samples relying on deeper, output-facing pathways.
-
Unlearning Sensitive Information in Multimodal LLMs: Benchmark and Attack-Defense Evaluation
UnLOK-VQA adds rephrase and neighborhood samples to OK-VQA to measure generalization and specificity of multimodal unlearning, and its evaluation shows that hiding answer tokens in hidden states beats other deletion o...
-
SoK: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models
A new taxonomy for LLM unlearning distinguishes removal-intended from suppression-intended methods, and argues that gradient ascent methods functionally behave like suppression.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.