REVIEW 3 cited by
Unlearning Sensitive Information in Multimodal LLMs: Benchmark and Attack-Defense Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Unlearning Sensitive Information in Multimodal LLMs: Benchmark and Attack-Defense Evaluation
read the original abstract
LLMs trained on massive datasets may inadvertently acquire sensitive information such as personal details and potentially harmful content. This risk is further heightened in multimodal LLMs as they integrate information from multiple modalities (image and text). Adversaries can exploit this knowledge through multimodal prompts to extract sensitive details. Evaluating how effectively MLLMs can forget such information (targeted unlearning) necessitates the creation of high-quality, well-annotated image-text pairs. While prior work on unlearning has focused on text, multimodal unlearning remains underexplored. To address this gap, we first introduce a multimodal unlearning benchmark, UnLOK-VQA (Unlearning Outside Knowledge VQA), as well as an attack-and-defense framework to evaluate methods for deleting specific multimodal knowledge from MLLMs. We extend a visual question-answering dataset using an automated pipeline that generates varying-proximity samples for testing generalization and specificity, followed by manual filtering for maintaining high quality. We then evaluate six defense objectives against seven attacks (four whitebox, three blackbox), including a novel whitebox method leveraging interpretability of hidden states. Our results show multimodal attacks outperform text- or image-only ones, and that the most effective defense removes answer information from internal model states. Additionally, larger models exhibit greater post-editing robustness, suggesting that scale enhances safety. UnLOK-VQA provides a rigorous benchmark for advancing unlearning in MLLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Metric Unreliability in Multimodal Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Analysis and Principled Unified Score
Standard metrics for multimodal machine unlearning conflict in rankings, addressed by a new oracle-correlated composite score that yields stable results.
-
POPS: Recovering Unlearned Multi-Modality Knowledge in MLLMs with Prompt-Optimized Parameter Shaking
Prompt-optimized suffixes plus synthetic fine-tuning recover ~82% of knowledge that multimodal unlearning methods claim to erase from MLLMs.
-
Metric Unreliability in Multimodal Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Analysis and Principled Unified Score
Standard unlearning metrics disagree in multimodal settings, but a correlation-weighted Unified Quality Score delivers consistent method rankings across benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.