REVIEW 5 cited by
Brain Foundation Models: A Survey on Advancements in Neural Signal Processing and Brain Discovery
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Brain Foundation Models: A Survey on Advancements in Neural Signal Processing and Brain Discovery
read the original abstract
Brain foundation models (BFMs) have emerged as a transformative paradigm in computational neuroscience, offering a revolutionary framework for processing diverse neural signals across different brain-related tasks. These models leverage large-scale pre-training techniques, allowing them to generalize effectively across multiple scenarios, tasks, and modalities, thus overcoming the traditional limitations faced by conventional artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in understanding complex brain data. By tapping into the power of pretrained models, BFMs provide a means to process neural data in a more unified manner, enabling advanced analysis and discovery in the field of neuroscience. In this survey, we define BFMs for the first time, providing a clear and concise framework for constructing and utilizing these models in various applications. We also examine the key principles and methodologies for developing these models, shedding light on how they transform the landscape of neural signal processing. This survey presents a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in BFMs, covering the most recent methodological innovations, novel views of application areas, and challenges in the field. Notably, we highlight the future directions and key challenges that need to be addressed to fully realize the potential of BFMs. These challenges include improving the quality of brain data, optimizing model architecture for better generalization, increasing training efficiency, and enhancing the interpretability and robustness of BFMs in real-world applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
OmniEEG-Bench: A Standardized Evaluation Benchmark for EEG Foundation Models
OmniEEG-Bench unifies 54 EEG datasets into six task families and benchmarks 10 foundation models, finding that pretraining diversity and model size correlate with better average performance ranks.
-
Foundation models for discovering robust biomarkers of neurological disorders from dynamic functional connectivity
RE-CONFIRM shows that standard fine-tuning of foundation models fails to recover known regional hubs in neurological disorders, while Hub-LoRA recovers them and outperforms custom models.
-
SCOPE: Structured Prototype-Guided Adaptation for EEG Foundation Models with Limited Labels
SCOPE uses cohort-level external supervision, confidence-aware pseudo-labels, and a lightweight prototype-conditioned adapter (ProAdapter) to adapt frozen EEG foundation models in label-limited settings, reporting con...
-
CodeBrain: Bridging Decoupled Tokenizer and Multi-Scale Architecture for EEG Foundation Model
CodeBrain introduces a decoupled TFDual-Tokenizer and multi-scale EEGSSM architecture for an EEG foundation model pretrained on a large corpus, claiming strong generalization across eight downstream tasks and ten datasets.
-
Large-Scale AI and Foundation Models for Neuroscience: A Comprehensive Review
This paper is a survey: it organizes existing foundation-model work in neuroscience into five application domains and lists public datasets, without presenting new experiments.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.