REVIEW 4 cited by
Mask-DPO: Generalizable Fine-grained Factuality Alignment of LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Mask-DPO: Generalizable Fine-grained Factuality Alignment of LLMs
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit hallucinations (i.e., unfaithful or nonsensical information) when serving as AI assistants in various domains. Since hallucinations always come with truthful content in the LLM responses, previous factuality alignment methods that conduct response-level preference learning inevitably introduced noises during training. Therefore, this paper proposes a fine-grained factuality alignment method based on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), called Mask-DPO. Incorporating sentence-level factuality as mask signals, Mask-DPO only learns from factually correct sentences in the preferred samples and prevents the penalty on factual contents in the not preferred samples, which resolves the ambiguity in the preference learning. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that Mask-DPO can significantly improve the factuality of LLMs responses to questions from both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets, although these questions and their corresponding topics are unseen during training. Only trained on the ANAH train set, the score of Llama3.1-8B-Instruct on the ANAH test set is improved from 49.19% to 77.53%, even surpassing the score of Llama3.1-70B-Instruct (53.44%), while its FactScore on the out-of-domain Biography dataset is also improved from 30.29% to 39.39%. We further study the generalization property of Mask-DPO using different training sample scaling strategies and find that scaling the number of topics in the dataset is more effective than the number of questions. We provide a hypothesis of what factual alignment is doing with LLMs, on the implication of this phenomenon, and conduct proof-of-concept experiments to verify it. We hope the method and the findings pave the way for future research on scaling factuality alignment.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
ThoughtFold: Folding Reasoning Chains via Introspective Preference Learning
ThoughtFold applies introspective redundancy detection within correct CoT trajectories to create sub-trajectory spectra, then uses masked preference optimization to penalize redundant explorations, yielding 56% token ...
-
Understanding New-Knowledge-Induced Factual Hallucinations in LLMs: Analysis and Interpretation
Fine-tuning on new knowledge induces propagating hallucinations in LLMs by weakening attention to key entities, with mitigation via reintroducing known knowledge during later training stages.
-
Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention
SENTINEL reduces MLLM object hallucinations by over 90% via sentence-level early intervention with detector-bootstrapped preference data and C-DPO loss, outperforming prior SOTA on hallucination and capability benchmarks.
-
Analyzing and Improving Fine-grained Preference Optimization in Medical LVLMs
Proposes bidirectional token-wise KL regularizer and visual-contrastive grounding objective to create fine-grained on-policy preference pairs for medical LVLMs by minimally editing model outputs.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.