Calibrating Verbal Uncertainty as a Linear Feature to Reduce Hallucinations
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SSMJYBT4record.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
LLMs often adopt an assertive language style also when making false claims. Such ``overconfident hallucinations'' mislead users and erode trust. Achieving the ability to express in language the actual degree of uncertainty around a claim is therefore of great importance. We find that ``verbal uncertainty'' is governed by a single linear feature in the representation space of LLMs, and show that this has only moderate correlation with the actual ``semantic uncertainty'' of the model. We apply this insight and show that (1) the mismatch between semantic and verbal uncertainty is a better predictor of hallucinations than semantic uncertainty alone and (2) we can intervene on verbal uncertainty at inference time and reduce confident hallucinations on short-form answers, achieving an average relative reduction of ~30%.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Can LLMs Use Linguistic Uncertainty Markers to Reliably Reflect Intrinsic Confidence?
LLMs struggle to associate epistemic markers with stable internal confidence levels across distributions, even under model-centric interpretations, while maintaining somewhat consistent marker rankings.
-
Explaining Sources of Uncertainty in Automated Fact-Checking
CLUE generates natural language explanations of model uncertainty in fact-checking by unsupervised identification of claim-evidence and inter-evidence conflicts and agreements, followed by prompting and attention steering.
-
Estimating Uncertainty from Reasoning: A Large-Scale Study of Multi- and Crosslingual MCQA Performance in LLMs
A large-scale multilingual evaluation of LLM uncertainty estimation methods across 22 languages and 9 models finds that English reasoning closes the UE gap for low-resource languages and that optimal UE method choice ...
-
Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs
RLMF uses quality of model self-judgments to refine RL rankings and select training data, achieving SOTA faithful calibration while preserving accuracy and outperforming standard RL by up to 63%.
-
Quantifying Faithful Confidence Expression in Large Reasoning Models
A new framework quantifies faithful confidence expression in large reasoning models by comparing linguistic decisiveness to token probabilities, hidden states, and response consistency, revealing it as a persistent challenge.
-
Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward
LLMs need metacognition to align expressed uncertainty with their actual knowledge boundaries, moving beyond knowledge expansion to reduce confident errors.
-
GrACE: A Generative Approach to Better Confidence Elicitation and Efficient Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models
GrACE is a fine-tuned generative method that uses similarity to a special token embedding for real-time calibrated confidence in LLMs and enables efficient confidence-based test-time scaling.
-
SEAT: Sparse Entity-Aware Tuning for Knowledge Adaptation while Preserving Epistemic Abstention
SEAT preserves epistemic abstention in LLMs during knowledge adaptation via sparse tuning and entity-perturbed KL regularization, yielding 18-101% better abstention on unknown queries while retaining near-perfect know...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.