pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.20964 · v3 · submitted 2025-03-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · physics.bio-ph· q-bio.SC

Active Hydrodynamic Theory of Euchromatin and Heterochromatin

S. Alex Rautu , Alexandra Zidovska , David Saintillan , Michael J. Shelley This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft physics.bio-phq-bio.SC
keywords active hydrodynamicschromatin phase separationheterochromatin dropletsnuclear confinementtranscription fluctuationseuchromatincontractile stressesgenome organization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Contractile stresses from cross-linking proteins drive heterochromatin droplet formation via phase separation, with transcription fluctuations generating coherent motions and deforming the droplets under nuclear confinement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops an active hydrodynamic theory for the large-scale behavior of euchromatin and heterochromatin. Contractile stresses induce mechanically driven phase separation that produces heterochromatin droplets; these droplets grow by coalescence and wet the nuclear boundary due to confinement. Active transcription fluctuations introduce non-equilibrium terms that generate long-range coherent flows of chromatin and nucleoplasm while continuously changing droplet shapes. A sympathetic reader cares because the framework accounts for genome organization through physical forces and flows rather than invoking separate biochemical rules at every scale.

Core claim

The authors present a hydrodynamic model in which contractile stresses arising from cross-linking proteins induce mechanically driven phase separation of heterochromatin into droplets. These droplets grow by coalescence and wet the nuclear boundary under confinement. Non-equilibrium fluctuations from active transcription drive long-range coherent motions of chromatin and the nucleoplasm while indirectly deforming the heterochromatin droplets.

What carries the argument

The active hydrodynamic framework that couples contractile stresses from cross-linkers to non-equilibrium fluctuation terms from transcription, all under nuclear confinement.

If this is right

  • Heterochromatin organizes into droplets that grow and merge through contractile-stress-driven phase separation.
  • Nuclear confinement causes the droplets to wet the boundary rather than remain spherical.
  • Transcription activity produces coherent long-range flows that advect both euchromatin and heterochromatin.
  • Fluctuation-induced flows continuously deform heterochromatin droplet interfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Blocking cross-linkers should eliminate droplet formation even if other silencing factors remain, offering a direct test of the mechanical mechanism.
  • Changing nuclear size or shape should alter droplet wetting and therefore the spatial distribution of silenced regions.
  • The coherent flows may bring distant active and silent loci into proximity, suggesting a physical route for modulating gene contacts.
  • Varying transcription rates would modulate both flow strength and droplet deformation, predicting observable changes in chromatin mobility.

Load-bearing premise

The nuclear interior behaves as a continuum fluid whose contractile stresses and fluctuation terms alone suffice to produce phase separation, droplet wetting, and coherent flows without additional molecular-scale regulation.

What would settle it

Experiments that block cross-linking proteins yet still observe heterochromatin droplet formation, or that halt transcription yet still see long-range coherent motions, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.20964 by Alexandra Zidovska, David Saintillan, Michael J. Shelley, S. Alex Rautu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of the cell nucleus, with chromatin com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (f) shows the two-dimensional projection of the velocity fields of solvent, euchromatin, and heterochro￾matin, at a single snapshot in time (in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Growth rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Two-point correlation of fluctuations from the mean of the scalar order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Total interface area [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Two-point correlation of heterochromatin density fluctuations from the mean, and normalized by their variance, at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Morphological regimes of heterochromatin in a spherical nucleus as a function of activity strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Diagrams showing instability regions in two dimensions as a function of components of the Fourier vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Diagrams of instability regions in three dimensions as a function of components of the Fourier vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The genome contains genetic information essential for cell's life. The genome's spatial organization inside the cell nucleus is critical for its proper function including gene regulation. The two major genomic compartments -- euchromatin and heterochromatin -- contain largely transcriptionally active and silenced genes, respectively, and exhibit distinct dynamics. In this work, we present a hydrodynamic framework that describes the large-scale behavior of euchromatin and heterochromatin, and accounts for the interplay of mechanical forces, active processes, and nuclear confinement. Our model shows contractile stresses from cross-linking proteins lead to the formation of heterochromatin droplets via mechanically driven phase separation. These droplets grow, coalesce, and in nuclear confinement, wet the boundary. Active processes, such as gene transcription in euchromatin, introduce non-equilibrium fluctuations that drive long-range, coherent motions of chromatin as well as the nucleoplasm, and thus alter the genome's spatial organization. These fluctuations also indirectly deform heterochromatin droplets, by continuously changing their shape. Taken together, our findings reveal how active forces, mechanical stresses and hydrodynamic flows contribute to the genome's organization at large scales and provide a physical framework for understanding chromatin organization and dynamics in live cells.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a continuum hydrodynamic model for euchromatin and heterochromatin compartments inside the confined nuclear volume. Contractile stresses generated by cross-linking proteins are shown to drive mechanically induced phase separation, producing heterochromatin droplets that grow, coalesce, and wet the nuclear boundary. Non-equilibrium fluctuations arising from active transcription in euchromatin generate long-range coherent flows that both reorganize the genome and indirectly deform the heterochromatin droplets.

Significance. If the derivations and numerical results hold, the work supplies a physically grounded, parameter-sparse framework that links contractile mechanics, active fluctuations, and geometric confinement to observable large-scale chromatin patterns and dynamics. Such a model could generate falsifiable predictions for droplet morphology, flow coherence lengths, and boundary wetting under varying nuclear confinement or transcriptional activity.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introduction state that the model 'shows' droplet growth, coalescence, and wetting, yet the main text should explicitly identify the section or figure where the corresponding simulation or analytic result is presented (e.g., §4 or Fig. 3).
  2. [Model formulation] Notation for the active stress tensor and fluctuation correlator should be introduced once with a clear table of symbols; repeated re-definition across sections risks confusion for readers.
  3. [Discussion] The manuscript would benefit from a brief discussion of how the continuum hydrodynamic description breaks down at molecular scales and what length-scale cutoff is implicitly assumed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The summary accurately captures the key elements of the hydrodynamic framework, including contractile stresses driving heterochromatin phase separation and active transcription fluctuations generating coherent flows.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the hydrodynamic framework

full rationale

The paper constructs and applies a continuum hydrodynamic model whose central results (contractile-stress-driven phase separation into heterochromatin droplets, their growth/coalescence/wetting, and transcription-induced coherent flows) follow directly from the stated equations, boundary conditions, and active-stress terms. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a self-definitional relation, or an unverified self-citation chain; the framework is presented as a self-contained demonstration of what the chosen hydrodynamic description produces under nuclear confinement. The derivation therefore remains independent of its target observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides insufficient detail to enumerate specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central modeling choices (continuum hydrodynamics, contractile stresses, active noise) are implicit domain assumptions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5753 in / 1052 out tokens · 47399 ms · 2026-05-22T22:27:54.659112+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    δˆρk E δˆρk H # =S k

    Linearized chromatin density equations To first order inε, the continuity equations for the chromatin components can be written as follows: ∂ ∂t (δρE) + ¯ρE ∇·δu E = ∆(δρE),(C3) ∂ ∂t (δρH) + ¯ρH ∇·δu H = ∆(δρH),(C4) while the solvent incompressibility condition becomes ∇·δu S = 0.(C5) Similarly, by expanding to first order inεthe momen- tum equations of e...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (C1) and (C2), and a perturbation in the nematic order parameter, Q= ¯Q+ε δQ(r, t),(C18) about a homogeneous state ¯Q, whereδQare the corre- sponding linear perturbations

    Linearized solvent equations Lastly, we also expand to linear order inεthe momen- tum equation of the solvent, using Eq. (C1) and (C2), and a perturbation in the nematic order parameter, Q= ¯Q+ε δQ(r, t),(C18) about a homogeneous state ¯Q, whereδQare the corre- sponding linear perturbations. This leads to the following expansion to first order inε: ∆(δuS)...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The definition in Eq

    Nematic order parameter The base state ofQis a symmetric, constant tensor, but its components are not entirely unconstrained, as Q= ´ ppΨ(p) d dp´ Ψ(p) ddp ,(C28) wherepis a unit vector in dimensiond, Ψ is an orienta- tional distribution, and the integration is performed over thed-dimensional unit sphere [64–67]. The definition in Eq. (C28) implies that t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Alberts, A

    B. Alberts, A. Johnson, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, and P. Walter,Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th ed. (Garland Science, 2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Cremer and C

    T. Cremer and C. Cremer, Chromosome territories, nu- clear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells, Nature Reviews Genetics2, 292 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Misteli, Beyond the sequence: Cellular organization of genome function, Cell128, 787 (2007)

    T. Misteli, Beyond the sequence: Cellular organization of genome function, Cell128, 787 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Bickmore and B

    W. Bickmore and B. van Steensel, Genome architecture: Domain organization of interphase chromosomes, Cell 152, 1270 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Gibcus and J

    J. Gibcus and J. Dekker, The hierarchy of the 3d genome, Molecular Cell49, 773 (2013)

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Pombo and N

    A. Pombo and N. Dillon, Three-dimensional genome architecture: players and mechanisms, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology16, 245 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Mirny and J

    L. Mirny and J. Dekker, Mechanisms of chromosome fold- ing and nuclear organization: Their interplay and open questions, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 14, a040147 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Bonev and G

    B. Bonev and G. Cavalli, Organization and function of the 3d genome, Nature Reviews Genetics17, 661 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    van Steensel and A

    B. van Steensel and A. S. Belmont, Lamina-associated domains: Links with chromosome architecture, hete- rochromatin, and gene repression, Cell169, 780 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Solovei, K

    I. Solovei, K. Thanisch, and Y. Feodorova, How to rule the nucleus: divide et impera, Current Opinion in Cell Biology40, 47 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Bizhanova and P

    A. Bizhanova and P. D. Kaufman, Close to the edge: Het- erochromatin at the nucleolar and nuclear peripheries, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms1864, 194666 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Amiad-Pavlov, D

    D. Amiad-Pavlov, D. Lorber, G. Bajpai, A. Reuveny, F. Roncato, R. Alon, S. Safran, and T. Volk, Live imaging of chromatin distribution reveals novel principles of nu- clear architecture and chromatin compartmentalization, Science Advances7, 10.1126/sciadv.abf6251 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf6251 2021

  16. [16]

    Feodorova, M

    Y. Feodorova, M. Falk, L. A. Mirny, and I. Solovei, View- ing nuclear architecture through the eyes of nocturnal mammals, Trends in Cell Biology30, 276 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Gonz´ alez-Acosta and M

    D. Gonz´ alez-Acosta and M. Lopes, Dna replication and replication stress response in the context of nuclear ar- chitecture, Chromosoma133, 57 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    J. Xu, H. Ma, J. Jin, S. Uttam, R. Fu, Y. Huang, and Y. Liu, Super-resolution imaging of higher-order chro- matin structures at different epigenomic states in single mammalian cells, Cell Reports24, 873 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    C. D. Allis and T. Jenuwein, The molecular hallmarks 21 of epigenetic control, Nature Reviews Genetics17, 487 (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Maison and G

    C. Maison and G. Almouzni, Hp1 and the dynamics of heterochromatin maintenance, Nature Reviews Molecu- lar Cell Biology5, 296 (2004)

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    R. C. Allshire and H. D. Madhani, Ten principles of het- erochromatin formation and function, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology19, 229 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Mutlu, H.-M

    B. Mutlu, H.-M. Chen, J. J. Moresco, B. D. Orelo, B. Yang, J. M. Gaspar, S. Keppler-Ross, J. R. Yates, D. H. Hall, E. M. Maine, and S. E. Mango, Regulated nu- clear accumulation of a histone methyltransferase times the onset of heterochromatin formation in c. elegans embryos, Science Advances4, 10.1126/sciadv.aat6224 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat6224 2018

  23. [23]

    A. R. Strom, A. V. Emelyanov, M. Mir, D. V. Fyo- dorov, X. Darzacq, and G. H. Karpen, Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation, Nature547, 241 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    A. G. Larson, D. Elnatan, M. M. Keenen, M. J. Trnka, J. B. Johnston, A. L. Burlingame, D. A. Agard, S. Red- ding, and G. J. Narlikar, Liquid droplet formation by hp1αsuggests a role for phase separation in heterochro- matin, Nature547, 236 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    A. G. Larson and G. J. Narlikar, The role of phase sep- aration in heterochromatin formation, function, and reg- ulation, Biochemistry57, 2540 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    M. R. H¨ ubner and D. L. Spector, Chromatin dynamics, Annual Review of Biophysics39, 471 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Lammerding, Mechanics of the nucleus, inComprehen- sive Physiology(Wiley, 2011) pp

    J. Lammerding, Mechanics of the nucleus, inComprehen- sive Physiology(Wiley, 2011) pp. 783–807

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Zidovska, The rich inner life of the cell nucleus: dy- namic organization, active flows, and emergent rheology, Biophysical Reviews12, 1093 (2020)

    A. Zidovska, The rich inner life of the cell nucleus: dy- namic organization, active flows, and emergent rheology, Biophysical Reviews12, 1093 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Eshghi, J

    I. Eshghi, J. A. Eaton, and A. Zidovska, Interphase chro- matin undergoes a local sol-gel transition upon cell differ- entiation, Physical Review Letters126, 228101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Janssen, S

    A. Janssen, S. U. Colmenares, and G. H. Karpen, Hete- rochromatin: Guardian of the genome, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology34, 265 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    E. M. Hildebrand and J. Dekker, Mechanisms and func- tions of chromosome compartmentalization, Trends in Biochemical Sciences45, 385 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Misteli, The self-organizing genome: Principles of genome architecture and function, Cell183, 28 (2020)

    T. Misteli, The self-organizing genome: Principles of genome architecture and function, Cell183, 28 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Zidovska, D

    A. Zidovska, D. A. Weitz, and T. J. Mitchison, Micron- scale coherence in interphase chromatin dynamics, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 15555 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    F.-Y. Chu, A. S. Clavijo, S. Lee, and A. Zidovska, Transcription-dependent mobility of single genes and genome-wide motions in live human cells, Nature Com- munications15, 8879 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Zidovska, The self-stirred genome: large-scale chro- matin dynamics, its biophysical origins and implications, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development61, 83 (2020)

    A. Zidovska, The self-stirred genome: large-scale chro- matin dynamics, its biophysical origins and implications, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development61, 83 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Bruinsma, A

    R. Bruinsma, A. Y. Grosberg, Y. Rabin, and A. Zidovska, Chromatin hydrodynamics, Biophys. J.106, 1871 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Eshghi, A

    I. Eshghi, A. Zidovska, and A. Y. Grosberg, Activity- driven phase transition causes coherent flows of chro- matin, Physical Review Letters131, 048401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Eshghi, A

    I. Eshghi, A. Zidovska, and A. Y. Grosberg, Model chro- matin flows: numerical analysis of linear and nonlinear hydrodynamics inside a sphere, The European Physical Journal E46, 69 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    M. Falk, Y. Feodorova, N. Naumova, M. Imakaev, B. R. Lajoie, H. Leonhardt, B. Joffe, J. Dekker, G. Fudenberg, I. Solovei, and L. A. Mirny, Heterochromatin drives com- partmentalization of inverted and conventional nuclei, Nature570, 395 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Bajpai, D

    G. Bajpai, D. A. Pavlov, D. Lorber, T. Volk, and S. Safran, Mesoscale phase separation of chromatin in the nucleus, eLife10, 10.7554/eLife.63976 (2021)

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.63976 2021

  41. [41]

    Adame-Arana, G

    O. Adame-Arana, G. Bajpai, D. Lorber, T. Volk, and S. Safran, Regulation of chromatin microphase sep- aration by binding of protein complexes, eLife12, 10.7554/eLife.82983 (2023)

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.82983 2023

  42. [42]

    Laghmach, M

    R. Laghmach, M. D. Pierro, and D. A. Potoyan, Four- dimensional mesoscale liquid model of nucleus resolves chromatin’s radial organization, PRX Life2, 013006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Ganai, S

    N. Ganai, S. Sengupta, and G. I. Menon, Chromo- some positioning from activity-based segregation, Nucleic Acids Research42, 4145 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Michieletto, E

    D. Michieletto, E. Orlandini, and D. Marenduzzo, Poly- mer model with epigenetic recoloring reveals a pathway for the de novo establishment and 3d organization of chromatin domains, Physical Review X6, 041047 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Smrek and K

    J. Smrek and K. Kremer, Small activity differences drive phase separation in active-passive polymer mixtures, Physical Review Letters118, 098002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    C. Hult, D. Adalsteinsson, P. A. Vasquez, J. Lawrimore, M. Bennett, A. York, D. Cook, E. Yeh, M. G. For- est, and K. Bloom, Enrichment of dynamic chromosomal crosslinks drive phase separation of the nucleolus, Nucleic Acids Research45, 11159 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    MacPherson, B

    Q. MacPherson, B. Beltran, and A. J. Spakowitz, Bottom–up modeling of chromatin segregation due to epigenetic modifications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 12739 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    G. Shi, L. Liu, C. Hyeon, and D. Thirumalai, Interphase human chromosome exhibits out of equilibrium glassy dy- namics, Nature Communications9, 3161 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    M. D. Pierro, D. A. Potoyan, P. G. Wolynes, and J. N. Onuchic, Anomalous diffusion, spatial coherence, and vis- coelasticity from the energy landscape of human chromo- somes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 7753 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    MacPherson, B

    Q. MacPherson, B. Beltran, and A. J. Spakowitz, Chro- matin compaction leads to a preference for peripheral heterochromatin, Biophysical Journal118, 1479 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Di Stefano, H.-W

    M. Di Stefano, H.-W. N¨ utzmann, M. Marti-Renom, and D. Jost, Polymer modelling unveils the roles of hete- rochromatin and nucleolar organizing regions in shaping 3d genome organization in arabidopsis thaliana, Nucleic Acids Research49, 1840 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Girard, M

    M. Girard, M. O. de la Cruz, J. F. Marko, and A. Erba¸ s, Heterogeneous flexibility can contribute to chromatin segregation in the cell nucleus, Physical Review E110, 014403 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Saintillan, M

    D. Saintillan, M. J. Shelley, and A. Zidovska, Exten- sile motor activity drives coherent motions in a model of interphase chromatin, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 11442 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Mahajan, W

    A. Mahajan, W. Yan, A. Zidovska, D. Saintillan, and M. J. Shelley, Euchromatin activity enhances segregation and compaction of heterochromatin in the cell nucleus, 22 Physical Review X12, 041033 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    R. Das, T. Sakaue, G. Shivashankar, J. Prost, and T. Hi- raiwa, How enzymatic activity is involved in chromatin organization, eLife11, 10.7554/eLife.79901 (2022)

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.79901 2022

  56. [56]

    Goychuk, D

    A. Goychuk, D. Kannan, A. K. Chakraborty, and M. Kardar, Polymer folding through active pro- cesses recreates features of genome organization, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, 10.1073/pnas.2221726120 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2221726120 2023

  57. [57]

    Weady, D

    S. Weady, D. B. Stein, A. Zidovska, and M. J. Shelley, Conformations, correlations, and instabilities of a flexible fiber in an active fluid, Physical Review Fluids9, 013102 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    R. J. Bearman and J. G. Kirkwood, Statistical mechanics of transport processes. xi. equations of transport in mul- ticomponent systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics 28, 136 (1958)

    work page 1958

  59. [59]

    F. M. Snell, R. Aranow, and R. A. Spangler, Statistical- mechanical derivation of the partial molecular stress ten- sors in isothermal multicomponent systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics47, 4959 (1967)

    work page 1967

  60. [60]

    Doi and A

    M. Doi and A. Onuki, Dynamic coupling between stress and composition in polymer solutions and blends, Jour- nal de Physique II2, 1631 (1992)

    work page 1992

  61. [61]

    Doi,Soft Matter Physics(Oxford University Press, 2013)

    M. Doi,Soft Matter Physics(Oxford University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    P. J. Foster, S. F¨ urthauer, M. J. Shelley, and D. J. Needle- man, Active contraction of microtubule networks, eLife 4, 10.7554/eLife.10837 (2015)

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.10837 2015

  63. [63]

    Toner, Y

    J. Toner, Y. Tu, and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks, Ann. Phys.318, 170 (2005)

    work page 2005

  64. [64]

    Lachner, D

    M. Lachner, D. O’Carroll, S. Rea, K. Mechtler, and T. Jenuwein, Methylation of histone h3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for hp1 proteins, Nature410, 116 (2001)

    work page 2001

  65. [65]

    Padeken, S

    J. Padeken, S. P. Methot, and S. M. Gasser, Establish- ment of h3k9-methylated heterochromatin and its func- tions in tissue differentiation and maintenance, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology23, 623 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    C. R. Clapier, J. Iwasa, B. R. Cairns, and C. L. Pe- terson, Mechanisms of action and regulation of atp- dependent chromatin-remodelling complexes, Nature Re- views Molecular Cell Biology18, 407 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    Saintillan and M

    D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Instabilities, pattern for- mation, and mixing in active suspensions, Physics of Flu- ids20, 123304 (2008)

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    Saintillan and M

    D. Saintillan and M. J. Shelley, Active suspensions and their nonlinear models, C. R. Physique14, 497 (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    T. Gao, M. D. Betterton, A.-S. Jhang, and M. J. Shelley, Analytical structure, dynamics, and coarse graining of a kinetic model of an active fluid, Phys. Rev. Fluids2, 093302 (2017)

    work page 2017

  70. [70]

    Doi and S

    M. Doi and S. Edwards,The Theory of Polymer Dynam- ics(Oxford University Press, 1986)

    work page 1986

  71. [71]

    Maddu, S

    S. Maddu, S. Weady, and M. J. Shelley, Learning fast, accurate, and stable closures of a kinetic theory of an ac- tive fluid, Journal of Computational Physics504, 112869 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    K. J. Burns, G. M. Vasil, J. S. Oishi, D. Lecoanet, and B. P. Brown, Dedalus: A flexible framework for numeri- cal simulations with spectral methods, Physical Review Research2, 023068 (2020)

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    See Supplemental Material for additional figures and videos

    work page

  74. [74]

    R. A. Simha and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamic fluc- tuations and instabilities in ordered suspensions of self- propelled particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 058101 (2002)

    work page 2002

  75. [75]

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1143 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    Solovei, A

    I. Solovei, A. Wang, K. Thanisch, C. Schmidt, S. Krebs, M. Zwerger, T. Cohen, D. Devys, R. Foisner, L. Pe- ichl, H. Herrmann, H. Blum, D. Engelkamp, C. Stewart, H. Leonhardt, and B. Joffe, Lbr and lamin a/c sequen- tially tether peripheral heterochromatin and inversely regulate differentiation, Cell152, 584 (2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    J. Kind, L. Pagie, H. Ortabozkoyun, S. Boyle, S. de Vries, H. Janssen, M. Amendola, L. Nolen, W. Bickmore, and B. van Steensel, Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions, Cell153, 178 (2013)

    work page 2013

  78. [78]

    Experiments using transcriptional inhibition alone typi- cally show chromatin decondensation, which arises from activation of the DNA damage response rather than loss of transcription

    work page

  79. [79]

    Milo and R

    R. Milo and R. Phillips,Cell Biology by the Numbers (Garland Science, 2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    D. L. Levy and R. Heald, Nuclear size is regulated by importinαand ntf2 in xenopus, Cell143, 288 (2010)

    work page 2010

Showing first 80 references.