REVIEW 11 cited by
Inference-Time Scaling for Complex Tasks: Where We Stand and What Lies Ahead
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Inference-Time Scaling for Complex Tasks: Where We Stand and What Lies Ahead
read the original abstract
Inference-time scaling can enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) on complex problems that benefit from step-by-step problem solving. Although lengthening generated scratchpads has proven effective for mathematical tasks, the broader impact of this approach on other tasks remains less clear. In this work, we investigate the benefits and limitations of scaling methods across nine state-of-the-art models and eight challenging tasks, including math and STEM reasoning, calendar planning, NP-hard problems, navigation, and spatial reasoning. We compare conventional models (e.g., GPT-4o) with models fine-tuned for inference-time scaling (e.g., o1) through evaluation protocols that involve repeated model calls, either independently or sequentially with feedback. These evaluations approximate lower and upper performance bounds and potential for future performance improvements for each model, whether through enhanced training or multi-model inference systems. Our extensive empirical analysis reveals that the advantages of inference-time scaling vary across tasks and diminish as problem complexity increases. In addition, simply using more tokens does not necessarily translate to higher accuracy in these challenging regimes. Results from multiple independent runs with conventional models using perfect verifiers show that, for some tasks, these models can achieve performance close to the average performance of today's most advanced reasoning models. However, for other tasks, a significant performance gap remains, even in very high scaling regimes. Encouragingly, all models demonstrate significant gains when inference is further scaled with perfect verifiers or strong feedback, suggesting ample potential for future improvements.
Forward citations
Cited by 11 Pith papers
-
Fork-Think with Confidence
Fork-think with confidence identifies forking points via model confidence in a single path before sampling continuations, cutting tokens up to 30% and runtime up to 57% on reasoning benchmarks while matching or exceed...
-
Joint Consistency: A Unified Test-Time Aggregation Framework via Energy Minimization
Joint Consistency casts test-time aggregation as Ising-type energy minimization with pairwise LLM-judge interactions, subsuming voting methods and outperforming baselines across reasoning tasks.
-
ToolPRM: Fine-Grained Inference Scaling of Structured Outputs for Function Calling
ToolPRM provides fine-grained intra-call process supervision via a new dataset and reward model, outperforming outcome and coarse-grained alternatives on function-calling benchmarks.
-
Accurate structural modeling of chemically diverse molecular interfaces with Vilya-2
Vilya-2 predicts bound structures of chemically diverse peptides and small molecules at state-of-the-art accuracy using an all-atom diffusion transformer, recovering 59.1% of peptide interfaces to sub-2 Å backbone RMSD.
-
Efficient Chain-of-Modality Reasoning via Progressive Compression for Spoken Language Models
Spoken math models that emit a 40%-compressed reasoning trace between question and answer beat full-reasoning baselines by ~3 accuracy points while using roughly one third of the text tokens.
-
Weighted Rules under the Stable Model Semantics
Weighted rules extend stable model semantics to support probabilistic reasoning, model ranking, and statistical inference in answer set programs.
-
NEURA: A Unified and Retargetable Compilation Framework for Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Architectures
NEURA flattens CGRA control flow into a pure predicated dataflow IR and reports 2.20× kernel and up to 2.71× application speedups over high-performance SOTA baselines.
-
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning
Entropy minimization on self-generated outputs elicits strong reasoning in pretrained LLMs, matching or exceeding supervised RL methods on benchmarks.
-
Physical Foundation Models: Fixed hardware implementations of large-scale neural networks
Physical Foundation Models are fixed physical hardware realizations of foundation-scale neural networks that compute via inherent material dynamics, potentially delivering orders-of-magnitude gains in energy efficienc...
-
Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models
The paper unifies perspectives on Long CoT in reasoning LLMs by introducing a taxonomy, detailing characteristics of deep reasoning and reflection, and discussing emergence phenomena and future directions.
-
Phi-4-reasoning Technical Report
A 14B reasoning model trained via supervised fine-tuning on selected prompts and o3-mini traces, plus outcome RL, outperforms larger open models like DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B on math, coding, planning and related...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.