Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.09522 v1 pith:5SDJP3TE submitted 2025-04-13 cs.CL cs.AI

How new data permeates LLM knowledge and how to dilute it

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords knowledgeinformationlearnlearningmodelexistingprimingdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models learn and continually learn through the accumulation of gradient-based updates, but how individual pieces of new information affect existing knowledge, leading to both beneficial generalization and problematic hallucination, remains poorly understood. We demonstrate that when learning new information, LLMs exhibit a "priming" effect: learning a new fact can cause the model to inappropriately apply that knowledge in unrelated contexts. To systematically study this phenomenon, we introduce "Outlandish," a carefully curated dataset of 1320 diverse text samples designed to probe how new knowledge permeates through an LLM's existing knowledge base. Using this dataset, we show that the degree of priming after learning new information can be predicted by measuring the token probability of key words before learning. This relationship holds robustly across different model architectures (PALM-2, Gemma, Llama), sizes, and training stages. Finally, we develop two novel techniques to modulate how new knowledge affects existing model behavior: (1) a ``stepping-stone'' text augmentation strategy and (2) an ``ignore-k'' update pruning method. These approaches reduce undesirable priming effects by 50-95\% while preserving the model's ability to learn new information. Our findings provide both empirical insights into how LLMs learn and practical tools for improving the specificity of knowledge insertion in language models. Further materials: https://sunchipsster1.github.io/projects/outlandish/

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can a Language Model Learn Facts Continually in Its Weights?

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Facts written into LLM weights are stored but question-keyed; broad data creates usable knowledge while later writes destroy access rather than storage, leaving context more reliable than weights for composition and r...

  2. Can a Language Model Learn Facts Continually in Its Weights?

    cs.CL 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Weight writes create question-keyed knowledge that later sequential writes redirect, so context—not weights—is the reliable channel for facts that must survive or be composed.

  3. Understanding New-Knowledge-Induced Factual Hallucinations in LLMs: Analysis and Interpretation

    cs.CL 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Fine-tuning on new knowledge induces propagating hallucinations in LLMs by weakening attention to key entities, with mitigation via reintroducing known knowledge during later training stages.

  4. Lethe: Purifying Backdoored Large Language Models with Knowledge Dilution

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    LETHE uses parameter-level model merging plus prompt-level word definitions to dilute backdoor behavior in LLMs, cutting attack success to below 7% in most tested settings.