REVIEW 3 cited by
LongPerceptualThoughts: Distilling System-2 Reasoning for System-1 Perception
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Recent reasoning models through test-time scaling have demonstrated that long chain-of-thoughts can unlock substantial performance boosts in hard reasoning tasks such as math and code. However, the benefit of such long thoughts for system-2 reasoning is relatively less explored in other domains such as perceptual tasks where shallower, system-1 reasoning seems sufficient. In this paper, we introduce LongPerceptualThoughts, a new synthetic dataset with 30K long-thought traces for perceptual tasks. The key challenges in synthesizing elaborate reasoning thoughts for perceptual tasks are that off-the-shelf models are not yet equipped with such thinking behavior and that it is not straightforward to build a reliable process verifier for perceptual tasks. Thus, we propose a novel three-stage data synthesis framework that first synthesizes verifiable multiple-choice questions from dense image descriptions, then extracts simple CoTs from VLMs for those verifiable problems, and finally expands those simple thoughts to elaborate long thoughts via frontier reasoning models. In controlled experiments with a strong instruction-tuned 7B model, we demonstrate notable improvements over existing visual reasoning data-generation methods. Our model, trained on the generated dataset, achieves an average +3.4 points improvement over 5 vision-centric benchmarks, including +11.8 points on V$^*$ Bench. Notably, despite being tuned for vision tasks, it also improves performance on the text reasoning benchmark, MMLU-Pro, by +2 points.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CASHEW: Stabilizing Multimodal Reasoning via Iterative Trajectory Aggregation
Iteratively aggregating multiple reasoning trajectories with Grounding-DINO-verified visual evidence improved VLM accuracy on 13 multimodal benchmarks, and an RL-trained version internalizes the aggregation.
-
Qwen Look Again: Guiding Vision-Language Reasoning Models to Re-attention Visual Information
Qwen-LookAgain copies or routes visual tokens back into the context at learned reflection steps, cutting hallucinations and raising visual QA accuracy.
-
Socratic-MCTS: Test-Time Visual Reasoning by Asking the Right Questions
Socratic-MCTS uses the model's own subquestions and answers in a Monte Carlo Tree Search to improve multimodal multiple-choice accuracy without fine-tuning.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.