pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.04444 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-07 · ✦ hep-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· hep-th· nucl-th· physics.plasm-ph

Normal mode analysis within relativistic massive transport

Xin Lin , Qiu-Ze Sun , Xin-Hui Wu , Jin Hu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 16:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thnucl-thphysics.plasm-ph
keywords relativistic transportBoltzmann equationLandau dampingcollective modesnormal mode analysismassive particlesbranch cuts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Massive relativistic transport couples sound and heat modes, with Landau damping from a continuous branch cut of infinitely many points.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes normal modes in the linearized Boltzmann equation for massive particles under the relaxation time approximation. It finds that secular equations for the sound and heat channels couple together, but this coupling disappears entirely when the particle mass approaches zero. Using the argument principle from complex analysis, the authors locate the critical wavenumbers where collective modes appear and derive their long-wavelength dispersion relations. The key new feature is that Landau damping in the massive case arises from a continuous branch cut made up of infinitely many branch points, in contrast to the two isolated branch points seen in the massless limit.

Core claim

In the massive case the secular equations for sound and heat modes are coupled, and this coupling vanishes as mass goes to zero. The massive system possesses infinitely many branch points that form a continuous branch cut responsible for Landau damping, whereas the massless system has only two such points.

What carries the argument

The argument principle applied to the secular equations of the linearized Boltzmann equation, which locates the collective modes and reveals the infinite-branch-point structure of the Landau damping cut.

Load-bearing premise

The collision integral is replaced by a simple relaxation-time form that ignores the detailed momentum dependence of scattering processes.

What would settle it

A direct numerical solution of the full linearized Boltzmann equation without the relaxation-time approximation that either reproduces or fails to reproduce the infinite sequence of branch points on the Landau cut.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04444 by Jin Hu, Qiu-Ze Sun, Xin-Hui Wu, Xin Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The typical trajectory of Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The typical trajectory of Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The critical values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The nonanalytical structures contained in the secular equations. The blue lines represent the branch cuts of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The branch cuts linking all branch points in the nonanalytic structure. The red line represents an arbitrarily [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we address the normal mode analysis on the linearized Boltzmann equation for massive particles in the relaxation time approximation. One intriguing feature of massive transport is the coupling of the secular equations between the sound and heat channels. This coupling vanishes as the mass approaches zero. By utilizing the argument principle in complex analysis, we determine the existence condition for collective modes and find the onset transition behavior of collective modes previously observed in massless systems. We numerically determine the critical wavenumber for the existence of each mode under various values of the scaled mass. Within the range of scaled masses considered, the critical wavenumbers for the heat and shear channels decrease with increasing scaled mass, while that of the sound channel exhibits a non-monotonic dependence on the scaled mass. In addition, we analytically derive the dispersion relations for these collective modes in the long-wavelength limit. Notably, kinetic theory also incorporates collisionless dissipation effects, known as Landau damping. We find that the branch cut structure responsible for Landau damping differs significantly from the massless case: whereas the massless system features only two branch points, the massive system exhibits an infinite number of such points forming a continuous branch cut.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs normal mode analysis on the linearized relativistic Boltzmann equation for massive particles in the relaxation time approximation. It examines the coupling of secular equations between sound and heat channels (which vanishes as mass approaches zero), applies the argument principle to determine existence conditions for collective modes, numerically computes critical wavenumbers for heat, sound, and shear channels across a range of scaled masses, derives analytic long-wavelength dispersion relations, and analyzes the branch-cut structure for Landau damping, claiming that the massive case features an infinite number of branch points forming a continuous cut (in contrast to two branch points in the massless case).

Significance. If the central results hold, the work provides concrete numerical and analytic characterizations of collective modes and collisionless dissipation in massive relativistic transport, with potential relevance to heavy-ion collisions or astrophysical plasmas. Strengths include the application of the argument principle for mode existence, the explicit long-wavelength expansions, and the focus on how mass affects channel coupling and damping structure.

major comments (1)
  1. [Landau damping and branch-cut analysis] The claim that the massive system exhibits an infinite number of branch points forming a continuous branch cut for Landau damping (contrasted with two branch points in the massless case) is load-bearing for the distinction between massive and massless transport. Standard analytic continuation of the dispersion integral ∫ dp p² f₀'(p) / (ω - k v(p) μ) with v(p) = p/E(p) and E = √(p² + m²) produces a single branch cut whose endpoints are the extremal phase velocities. The manuscript should clarify in the Landau-damping section how the mass term generates infinitely many isolated branch points rather than one continuous cut segment; an explicit derivation or numerical illustration of the pole/branch-point locations would resolve this.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'the onset transition behavior of collective modes previously observed in massless systems' without a brief description or citation; adding one sentence or a reference would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comment on the branch-cut analysis. We address this point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional clarification and supporting material as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Landau damping and branch-cut analysis] The claim that the massive system exhibits an infinite number of branch points forming a continuous branch cut for Landau damping (contrasted with two branch points in the massless case) is load-bearing for the distinction between massive and massless transport. Standard analytic continuation of the dispersion integral ∫ dp p² f₀'(p) / (ω - k v(p) μ) with v(p) = p/E(p) and E = √(p² + m²) produces a single branch cut whose endpoints are the extremal phase velocities. The manuscript should clarify in the Landau-damping section how the mass term generates infinitely many isolated branch points rather than one continuous cut segment; an explicit derivation or numerical illustration of the pole/branch-point locations would resolve this.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation and agree that further clarification is warranted. In the massless limit the particle speed is fixed at unity, so the analytic continuation of the dispersion integral yields branch points only at the two endpoints of the light-cone interval. For finite mass the speed v(p) = p/E(p) varies continuously from 0 to 1 as p ranges from 0 to ∞. Consequently the condition for a singularity in the integrand, ω/k = v(p)μ, can be satisfied for a dense set of velocities v(p) ∈ [0,1] and directions μ ∈ [-1,1]. This produces an infinite collection of isolated branch points whose locations densely fill the interval between the minimal and maximal phase velocities, thereby forming a continuous branch cut. We will revise the Landau-damping section to include (i) an explicit derivation that locates these branch points by solving the vanishing-denominator condition for successive momentum shells and (ii) a numerical illustration that plots the real-axis singularities obtained from a discretized momentum grid, demonstrating their accumulation into a continuous cut. This material will be added to the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard complex analysis to linearized equations

full rationale

The paper derives secular equations from the linearized Boltzmann equation in RTA, then applies the argument principle to locate collective modes and numerically solves for critical wavenumbers as functions of scaled mass. Dispersion relations in the long-wavelength limit are obtained analytically from the same equations. The claimed branch-cut structure for Landau damping follows from analytic continuation of the dispersion integral with the massive dispersion relation E=√(p²+m²); this is a direct mathematical consequence of the integral kernel rather than a fit or self-referential definition. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansätze smuggled via prior work appear in the derivation chain. The vanishing of sound-heat coupling as m→0 is an explicit limit of the secular equations themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the linearized Boltzmann equation under relaxation time approximation as the governing dynamics, with no additional free parameters or invented entities introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The collision term can be approximated by the relaxation time form in the linearized Boltzmann equation.
    This approximation is invoked to close the equation for normal mode analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 1223 out tokens · 83879 ms · 2026-05-22T16:23:31.029537+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , A12 = κ2(−zK 2 1 +K 1(zKi 1 −2K 2) + 3Ki1K2) 3γ2K2 p −(z2K 2 1 + 3zK1K2 −(3 +z 2)K 2 2) , A13 = κ(−2ω+iγ)K 2 γ2 p K2(zK1 + 4K2) , A21 = κ2zK2(zK 2 1 + 4K1K2 −zK 2 2) γ2 p −(z2K 2 1 + 3zK1K2 −(3 +z 2)K 2 2) 3 , A22 = −ωz 2(ω−iγ)K 2 1 −3ωz(ω−iγ)K 1K2 + (κ2 +ω(3 +z 2)(ω−iγ))K 2 2 γ2(z2K 2 1 + 3zK1K2 −(3 +z 2)K 2

    work page

  2. [2]

    , A23 = iκ(2iω+γ)(zK 1 + 4K2)√K2 γ2 p −z3K 3 1 −7z 2K 2 1 K2 +z(−9 +z 2)K1K 2 2 + 4(3 +z 2)K 3 1 , A31 = −κz(2ω−iγ)(zK 2 1 + 4K1K2 −zK 2 2)√K2 γ2(z2K 2 1 + 3zK1K2 −(3 +z 2)K 2

    work page

  3. [3]

    In the above expressions, the Bickley functionKi n(z) appears defined as [51] Ki n (z)≡ Z ∞ 0 e−zcoshx 1 coshn x dx.(39) Below, the dependence onzofKi n(z) will be suppressed

    , A32 = κ(−2ω+iγ)K 3/2 2 γ2 p −z3K 3 1 −7z 2K 2 1 K2 +z(−9 +z 2)K1K 2 2 + 4(3 +z 2)K 3 1 , A33 = Ki 1κ2z3 −z(κ 2(3 +z 2) + 5ω(ω−iγ))K 1 + (κ2(−12 +z 2)−20ω(ω−iγ))K 2 5γ2(zK1 + 4K2) , (38) where we retain the terms up toO(κ 2). In the above expressions, the Bickley functionKi n(z) appears defined as [51] Ki n (z)≡ Z ∞ 0 e−zcoshx 1 coshn x dx.(39) Below, th...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Based on the above analysis, the number of obtained modes matches the number of zeros derived from the argument principle

    Additionally, we find that in this case z≪1, the sound and heat channels in Φ 1 decouple, resulting in Φ1 (ˆγ, c) = ˆγcoth−1 c−1 3ˆγ(c−ˆγ) + (3cˆγ(ˆγ−c)−ˆγ) coth−1 c+ 1 = 0,(50) as expected in [47]. Based on the above analysis, the number of obtained modes matches the number of zeros derived from the argument principle. These dynamical modes originate fro...

    work page

  5. [5]

    − (−K2 +zK 3)G(c, z,2,1) z2((−1 +z 2)K 2 2 + 5zK2K3 −z 2K 2 3))−1,(C1) A12 = ˆγ((K2 −zK 3)G(c, z,1,1)/K 2 −G(c, z,2,1) z2 p ((−1 +z 2)K 2 2 + 5zK2K3 −z 2K 2 3) ),(C2) A13 = ˆγ z2 (zK3 −K 2)√z5K2K3 − cG(c, z,2,1)√z5K2K3 ,(C3) A21 = ˆγ( K2(zK2 + 3K3)G(c, z,2,1) z((−1 +z 2)K 2 2 + 5zK2K3 −z 2K 2 3) 3 2 − K2(−K2 +zK 3)G(c, z,3,1) z2((−1 +z 2)K 2 2 + 5zK2K3 −z...

    work page

  6. [6]

    − (−K2 +zK 3)G(c, z,2,1) z2((−1 +z 2)K 2 2 + 5zK2K3 −z 2K 2 3))−1,(C5) A23 = ˆγ( K2(z4K2 + 3z3K3)−cK 2G(c, z,3,1) z2 p zK3((−1 +z 2)K 2 2 + 5zK2K3 −z 2K 2 3) ),(C6) A31 = ˆγ(c√K2(−K2 +zK 3)G(c, z,3,1)/ √zK3 −c √zK2K3(zK2 + 3K3)G(c, z,2,1)/K 3 z2((−1 +z 2)K 2 2 + 5zK2K3 −z 2K 2

    work page

  7. [7]

    ),(C7) A32 = ˆγ( s 5 + (−1 +z 2)K2 zK3 − zK3 K2 + zc K3 K2 G(c, z,2,1)−c(G(c, z,2,1) +G(c, z,3,1)) q z5 K3 K2 ((−1 +z 2)K 2 2 + 5zK2K3 −z 2K 2 3) ),(C8) A33 = ˆγ(c(−3− zK2 K3 ) + c2G(c, z,3,1) z3K3 )−1.(C9)

    work page

  8. [8]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Relativistic Fluid Dynamics In and Out of Equilibrium, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019). 17

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    McDonough, Phys

    E. McDonough, Phys. Lett. B809, 135755 (2020), 2001.03633

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Y. Hama, T. Kodama, and O. Socolowski, Jr., Braz. J. Phys.35, 24 (2005), hep-ph/0407264

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  11. [11]

    Hydrodynamic Models for Heavy Ion Collisions

    P. Huovinen and P. V. Ruuskanen, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.56, 163 (2006), nucl-th/0605008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    Introduction to Hydrodynamics

    S. Jeon and U. Heinz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E24, 1530010 (2015), 1503.03931

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    J. E. Bernhard, J. S. Moreland, and S. A. Bass, Nature Phys.15, 1113 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Auvinen, K

    J. Auvinen, K. J. Eskola, P. Huovinen, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. C102, 044911 (2020), 2006.12499

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. G¨ ursoy, and R. Snellings, Phys. Rev. C103, 054909 (2021), 2010.15134

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Everett et al

    D. Everett et al. (JETSCAPE), Phys. Rev. C103, 054904 (2021), 2011.01430

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    J. E. Parkkila, A. Onnerstad, and D. J. Kim, Phys. Rev. C104, 054904 (2021), 2106.05019

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Bulk viscosity of strongly interacting matter in the relaxation time approximation

    A. Czajka, S. Hauksson, C. Shen, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C97, 044914 (2018), 1712.05905

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Evidence for collectivity in pp collisions at the LHC

    V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B765, 193 (2017), 1606.06198

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Measurement of multi-particle azimuthal correlations in $pp$, $p$+Pb and low-multiplicity Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector

    M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), Eur. Phys. J. C77, 428 (2017), 1705.04176

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    M. P. Heller, R. A. Janik, and P. Witaszczyk, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 201602 (2012), 1103.3452

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1987), second edition ed

    work page 1987

  23. [23]

    M. P. Heller and M. Spalinski, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 072501 (2015), 1503.07514

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    Strickland, JHEP12, 128 (2018), 1809.01200

    M. Strickland, JHEP12, 128 (2018), 1809.01200

    work page arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    G. S. Denicol and J. Noronha, Nucl. Phys. A1005, 121748 (2021), 2003.00181

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Far-from-equilibrium attractors and nonlinear dynamical systems approach to the Gubser flow

    A. Behtash, C. N. Cruz-Camacho, and M. Martinez, Phys. Rev. D97, 044041 (2018), 1711.01745

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Fluid Dynamics far from Local Equilibrium

    P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 012301 (2018), 1704.08699

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Chattopadhyay and U

    C. Chattopadhyay and U. W. Heinz, Phys. Lett. B801, 135158 (2020), 1911.07765

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Kurkela, W

    A. Kurkela, W. van der Schee, U. A. Wiedemann, and B. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 102301 (2020), 1907.08101

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Chen and S

    S. Chen and S. Shi, Phys. Rev. C111, L021902 (2025), 2407.15209

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Retarded Correlators in Kinetic Theory: Branch Cuts, Poles and Hydrodynamic Onset Transitions

    P. Romatschke, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 352 (2016), 1512.02641

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Analytic structure of nonhydrodynamic modes in kinetic theory

    A. Kurkela and U. A. Wiedemann, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 776 (2019), 1712.04376

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Bajec, S

    M. Bajec, S. Grozdanov, and A. Soloviev, JHEP08, 065 (2024), 2403.17769

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Brants, Phys

    R. Brants, Phys. Rev. D110, 116027 (2024), 2409.09022

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    S. A. Hartnoll and S. P. Kumar, JHEP12, 036 (2005), hep-th/0508092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. D72, 086009 (2005), hep-th/0506184

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  37. [37]

    From strong to weak coupling in holographic models of thermalization

    S. Grozdanov, N. Kaplis, and A. O. Starinets, JHEP07, 151 (2016), 1605.02173

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    R. M. Strain, Commun. Math. Phys.300, 529 (2010), 1003.4893

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    Gavassino, Phys

    L. Gavassino, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L042043 (2024), 2404.12327

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    G. D. Moore, JHEP05, 084 (2018), 1803.00736

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Ochsenfeld and S

    S. Ochsenfeld and S. Schlichting, JHEP09, 186 (2023), 2308.04491

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Hu, SciPost Phys.20, 020 (2026), 2409.05131

    J. Hu, SciPost Phys.20, 020 (2026), 2409.05131

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Liboff, Kinetic Theory (Springer, 2003)

    R. Liboff, Kinetic Theory (Springer, 2003)

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    Dudy´ nski, J

    M. Dudy´ nski, J. Stat. Phys.153, 1084–1106 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    S. R. De Groot, W. A. Van Leeuwen, and C. G. Van Weert, Relativistic Kinetic Theory. Principles and Applications (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980)

    work page 1980

  46. [46]

    Hu and S

    J. Hu and S. Shi, Phys. Rev. D106, 014007 (2022), 2204.10100

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Analytic solution of the Boltzmann equation in an expanding system

    D. Bazow, G. S. Denicol, U. Heinz, M. Martinez, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 022301 (2016), 1507.07834

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Hu, JHEP2025, 066 (2025), 2411.16448

    J. Hu, JHEP2025, 066 (2025), 2411.16448

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    G. S. Rocha, I. Danhoni, K. Ingles, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. D110, 076003 (2024), 2404.04679

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    J. L. Anderson and H. R. Witting, Physica74, 466 (1974)

    work page 1974

  51. [51]

    G. S. Rocha, G. S. Denicol, and J. Noronha, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 042301 (2021), 2103.07489

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Hu, Phys

    J. Hu, Phys. Rev. D105, 096021 (2022), 2204.12946

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Hu and Z

    J. Hu and Z. Xu, Phys. Rev. D107, 016010 (2023), 2205.15755

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    J. Hu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 281 (2025), 2310.05606

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    A. Katz, A. Kurkela, and A. Soloviev, JCAP08, 017 (2019), 1906.05341

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Hataei, R

    A. Hataei, R. Heydari, and F. Taghinavaz (2025), 2504.14591

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Bajec and A

    M. Bajec and A. Soloviev, Phys. Rev. D112, 065002 (2025), 2506.15531

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Olver, D

    F. Olver, D. Lozier, R. Boisvert, and C. Clark, The NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2010)

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    Cercignani and G

    C. Cercignani and G. M. Kremer, The Relativistic Boltzmann Equation: Theory and Applications (Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2002)

    work page 2002

  60. [60]

    M. P. Heller, A. Serantes, M. Spali´ nski, V. Svensson, and B. Withers, SciPost Phys.10, 123 (2021), 2012.15393

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Short-lived modes from hydrodynamic dispersion relations

    B. Withers, JHEP06, 059 (2018), 1803.08058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    On the convergence of the gradient expansion in hydrodynamics

    S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets, and P. Tadi´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 251601 (2019), 1904.01018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Dawson, Phys

    J. Dawson, Phys. Fluids4, 869 (1961)

    work page 1961

  64. [64]

    Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov, and H. Liu, JHEP10, 035 (2018), 1809.01169

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    Black hole scrambling from hydrodynamics

    S. Grozdanov, K. Schalm, and V. Scopelliti, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 231601 (2018), 1710.00921

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Abbasi and D

    N. Abbasi and D. H. Rischke, JHEP05, 241 (2025), 2410.07929

    work page arXiv 2025