Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Runtime Quantum Advantage with Digital Quantum Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.08663 v1 pith:CNDOOHKV submitted 2025-05-13 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

Runtime Quantum Advantage with Digital Quantum Optimization

classification quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantumadvantageevenoptimizationruntimealgorithmscounterdiabaticdigital
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We demonstrate experimentally that the bias-field digitized counterdiabatic quantum optimization (BF-DCQO) algorithm on IBM's 156-qubit devices can outperform simulated annealing (SA) and CPLEX in time-to-approximate solutions for specific higher-order unconstrained binary optimization (HUBO) problems. We suitably select problem instances that are challenging for classical methods, running in fractions of minutes even with multicore processors. On the other hand, our counterdiabatic quantum algorithms obtain similar or better results in at most a few seconds on quantum hardware, achieving runtime quantum advantage. Our analysis reveals that the performance improvement becomes increasingly evident as the system size grows. Given the rapid progress in quantum hardware, we expect that this improvement will become even more pronounced, potentially leading to a quantum advantage of several orders of magnitude. Our results indicate that available digital quantum processors, when combined with specific-purpose quantum algorithms, exhibit a runtime quantum advantage even in the absence of quantum error correction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AutoVerifier: An Agentic Automated Verification Framework Using Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AutoVerifier decomposes technical claims into triples and uses layered LLM verification to assess validity, demonstrated on a quantum computing paper by finding overclaims and conflicts.

  2. Constrained Quantum Optimization via Iterative Warm-Start XY-Mixers

    quant-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.5

    A warm-started XY-mixer aligned to a biased W-state, iterated via sample-based probability updates, raises optimal-solution sampling rates for one-hot constrained QAOA and finds optima on 144-qubit hardware with post-...

  3. Simulated Bifurcation Quantum Annealing

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SBQA adds inter-replica interactions to simulated bifurcation to mimic quantum tunneling and improves performance on sparse rugged optimization problems over standard SBM.

  4. Recent quantum runtime (dis)advantages

    quant-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    End-to-end runtime definitions and strong classical baselines show that three recent quantum advantage claims in annealing, Simon's problem, and hybrid algorithms do not hold on NISQ hardware.

  5. Quantum optimization beyond QUBO for industrial logistics and scheduling

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    HUBO formulations for logistics problems offer qubit savings over QUBO at the expense of higher circuit depth, validated classically and simulated quantumly for small cases.