pith. sign in

arxiv: 2506.08682 · v3 · submitted 2025-06-10 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Superconformal Weight Shifting Operators

Tobias Hansen , Paul Heslop , Hector Puerta-Ramisa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 10:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords superconformal blocksweight shifting operatorsanalytic superspacesuper-GrassmannianSU(m,m|2n)conformal bootstrapN=4 super Yang-Millssupersymmetric CFT
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Covariant differential operators generate all superconformal blocks from the known half-BPS ones.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs SU(m,m|2n)-covariant differential operators in analytic superspace. These operators generalize existing conformal weight-shifting operators to the supersymmetric setting. Applying them to half-BPS blocks produces the full set of superconformal blocks for correlators of general supermultiplets. The construction treats analytic superspace as the super-Grassmannian Gr(m|n,2m|2n), which encodes the required transformation properties under the superconformal group. The resulting framework supports calculations of correlation functions in four-dimensional N=2 and N=4 theories and offers a route to extend the conformal bootstrap to supersymmetric models.

Core claim

We develop a framework for constructing superconformal blocks for correlators of general supermultiplets in theories with SU(m,m|2n) symmetry. We use analytic superspace, viewed as the super-Grassmannian Gr(m|n,2m|2n), which includes 4D Minkowski space. In this formalism, superblocks for non-half-BPS correlators are analogous to non-supersymmetric conformal blocks for correlators of fields with spin. We construct SU(m,m|2n)-covariant differential operators which generalise the existing conformal weight-shifting operators, and thus allow us to derive all superconformal blocks from the known half-BPS blocks.

What carries the argument

SU(m,m|2n)-covariant differential operators that act on analytic superspace identified with the super-Grassmannian Gr(m|n,2m|2n)

If this is right

  • All superconformal blocks for non-half-BPS correlators follow from known half-BPS blocks by repeated application of the new operators.
  • The framework directly supports numerical and analytic progress in the conformal bootstrap for four-dimensional N=2 and N=4 theories.
  • The same construction supplies a natural route to lower- and higher-dimensional superconformal field theories.
  • The Grassmannian approach provides a simpler alternative to embedding-space methods even for ordinary non-supersymmetric conformal blocks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Explicit low-point examples could be computed to produce closed-form expressions for previously inaccessible superblocks.
  • The operators may extend to other superconformal algebras beyond SU(m,m|2n) by replacing the Grassmannian with the appropriate homogeneous space.
  • Combining these blocks with the numerical bootstrap could tighten bounds on operator dimensions and OPE coefficients in supersymmetric models.

Load-bearing premise

Analytic superspace as the super-Grassmannian correctly encodes the transformation properties of general supermultiplets so that the new operators preserve covariance.

What would settle it

Apply the operators to a specific non-half-BPS four-point function in N=4 SYM, extract the resulting block, and verify that it satisfies the superconformal Ward identities or reproduces a known result obtained by other methods.

read the original abstract

We develop a framework for constructing superconformal blocks for correlators of general supermultiplets in theories with $\mathrm{SU}(m,m|2n)$ symmetry, such as four-dimensional $\mathcal{N}=2$ and $\mathcal{N} = 4$ conformal theories. We use analytic superspace, viewed as the super-Grassmannian $\mathrm{Gr}(m|n,2m|2n)$, which includes 4D Minkowski space ($m=2,n=0$). In this formalism, superblocks for non-half-BPS correlators are analogous to non-supersymmetric conformal blocks for correlators of fields with spin. We construct $\mathrm{SU}(m,m|2n)$-covariant differential operators which generalise the existing conformal weight-shifting operators, and thus allow us to derive all superconformal blocks from the known half-BPS blocks. Our results provide a framework from which to advance the conformal bootstrap in 4D supersymmetric settings, with potential extensions to lower and higher-dimensional SCFTs. The Grassmannian formalism is also seen to offer a natural and often simpler alternative to the embedding space formalism of non-supersymmetric CFTs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a framework for superconformal blocks of general supermultiplets in SU(m,m|2n) theories by identifying analytic superspace with the super-Grassmannian Gr(m|n,2m|2n), which includes 4D Minkowski space as the m=2,n=0 case. It constructs SU(m,m|2n)-covariant differential operators that generalize existing conformal weight-shifting operators, thereby allowing all superconformal blocks to be derived from known half-BPS blocks. The approach is presented as a tool for the conformal bootstrap in 4D N=2 and N=4 SCFTs, with potential extensions to other dimensions and the Grassmannian formalism positioned as a simpler alternative to embedding-space methods.

Significance. If the operators are shown to preserve full superconformal covariance and yield blocks that satisfy the Ward identities, the work would supply a systematic route from half-BPS to non-half-BPS superblocks, which is a useful addition to the bootstrap toolkit for supersymmetric CFTs. The explicit generalization of weight-shifting operators and the concrete embedding of Minkowski space are concrete strengths that connect the construction to established non-supersymmetric techniques.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and introduction: the central claim that the new operators 'allow us to derive all superconformal blocks from the known half-BPS blocks' is stated without an explicit non-half-BPS example that verifies the resulting correlators obey the superconformal Ward identities; such a check is load-bearing for the utility of the framework.
  2. Section describing the super-Grassmannian identification: the assertion that Gr(m|n,2m|2n) correctly encodes the transformation properties of general supermultiplets under SU(m,m|2n) so that the differential operators remain covariant is not accompanied by an explicit demonstration that no extraneous constraints or singularities appear when the operators act on non-half-BPS correlators.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation: the precise relation between the analytic superspace coordinates and the standard super-Grassmannian coordinates should be spelled out with an explicit coordinate chart or transition function to aid readers familiar with either formalism.
  2. References: the discussion of conformal weight-shifting operators would benefit from citing the original works that introduced them in the non-supersymmetric setting.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating the changes made in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and introduction: the central claim that the new operators 'allow us to derive all superconformal blocks from the known half-BPS blocks' is stated without an explicit non-half-BPS example that verifies the resulting correlators obey the superconformal Ward identities; such a check is load-bearing for the utility of the framework.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit non-half-BPS example strengthens the presentation. The general covariance follows from the construction of the operators as SU(m,m|2n)-covariant differential operators on the super-Grassmannian. In the revised manuscript we have added a concrete example for a non-half-BPS correlator, explicitly verifying that the derived blocks satisfy the superconformal Ward identities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Section describing the super-Grassmannian identification: the assertion that Gr(m|n,2m|2n) correctly encodes the transformation properties of general supermultiplets under SU(m,m|2n) so that the differential operators remain covariant is not accompanied by an explicit demonstration that no extraneous constraints or singularities appear when the operators act on non-half-BPS correlators.

    Authors: The super-Grassmannian identification rests on standard results in superconformal geometry and representation theory. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript includes an explicit check (in a new subsection) showing that the operators act on non-half-BPS correlators without introducing extraneous constraints or singularities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: operators constructed from covariance on super-Grassmannian, blocks derived from independent half-BPS inputs

full rationale

The paper's derivation begins with the identification of analytic superspace as the super-Grassmannian Gr(m|n,2m|2n) and constructs SU(m,m|2n)-covariant differential operators by generalizing the known conformal weight-shifting operators. These operators are defined to preserve covariance by construction on the Grassmannian, which includes 4D Minkowski space. The superconformal blocks for general supermultiplets are then obtained by applying the operators to the known half-BPS blocks, which are treated as external inputs rather than derived within the paper. No equation or step reduces the final blocks to a redefinition or statistical fit of the half-BPS results; the covariance requirement supplies independent content. The framework is a direct mathematical construction without self-citation chains or ansatz smuggling for the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the identification of analytic superspace with the super-Grassmannian and on the existence of known half-BPS blocks; no free parameters or new postulated entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Analytic superspace is the super-Grassmannian Gr(m|n,2m|2n) that encodes SU(m,m|2n) superconformal transformations for correlators of general supermultiplets.
    Invoked as the geometric setting in which the covariant operators are constructed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 1456 out tokens · 52286 ms · 2026-05-19T10:40:05.894754+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages · 50 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Mack and A

    G. Mack and A. Salam, Finite-Component Field Representations of the Conformal Group , Annals Phys. 53 (1969) 174

    work page 1969

  2. [2]

    Polyakov, Non-Hamiltonian approach to quantum field theory , Zh

    A.M. Polyakov, Non-Hamiltonian approach to quantum field theory , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66 (1974) 23

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    Ferrara, A.F

    S. Ferrara, A.F. Grillo and R. Gatto, Tensor representations of conformal algebra and conformally covariant operator product expansion, Annals Phys. 76 (1973) 161

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    Ferrara, A.F

    S. Ferrara, A.F. Grillo, G. Parisi and R. Gatto, Covariant expansion of the conformal four-point function, Nucl. Phys. B 49 (1972) 77

    work page 1972

  5. [5]

    Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT

    R. Rattazzi, V.S. Rychkov, E. Tonni and A. Vichi, Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT, JHEP 12 (2008) 031 [ 0807.0004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Rigorous Limits on the Interaction Strength in Quantum Field Theory

    F. Caracciolo and V.S. Rychkov, Rigorous Limits on the Interaction Strength in Quantum Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 085037 [ 0912.2726]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Carving Out the Space of 4D CFTs

    D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Carving Out the Space of 4D CFTs , JHEP 05 (2012) 110 [ 1109.5176]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap

    S. El-Showk, M.F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi, Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 025022 [1203.6064]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi, The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 015002 [ 1805.04405]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Conformal Four Point Functions and the Operator Product Expansion

    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Conformal four point functions and the operator product expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 599 (2001) 459 [ hep-th/0011040]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  11. [11]

    Conformal Partial Waves and the Operator Product Expansion

    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion , Nucl. Phys. B 678 (2004) 491 [ hep-th/0309180]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  12. [12]

    Spinning Conformal Correlators

    M.S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning Conformal Correlators , JHEP 11 (2011) 071 [ 1107.3554]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  13. [13]

    Spinning Conformal Blocks

    M.S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning Conformal Blocks , JHEP 11 (2011) 154 [ 1109.6321]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    Karateev, P

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Weight Shifting Operators and Conformal Blocks, JHEP 02 (2018) 081 [ 1706.07813]

    work page arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    General Bootstrap Equations in 4D CFTs

    G.F. Cuomo, D. Karateev and P. Kravchuk, General Bootstrap Equations in 4D CFTs , JHEP 01 (2018) 130 [ 1705.05401]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Dymarsky, J

    A. Dymarsky, J. Penedones, E. Trevisani and A. Vichi, Charting the space of 3D CFTs with a continuous global symmetry , JHEP 05 (2019) 098 [ 1705.04278]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Reehorst, E

    M. Reehorst, E. Trevisani and A. Vichi, Mixed Scalar-Current bootstrap in three dimensions, JHEP 12 (2020) 156 [ 1911.05747]. – 72 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Y.-C. He, J. Rong, N. Su and A. Vichi, Non-Abelian currents bootstrap, JHEP 03 (2024) 175 [2302.11585]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    The 3d Stress-Tensor Bootstrap

    A. Dymarsky, F. Kos, P. Kravchuk, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The 3d Stress-Tensor Bootstrap, JHEP 02 (2018) 164 [ 1708.05718]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Chang, V

    C.-H. Chang, V. Dommes, R.S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M.S. Mitchell, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor , JHEP 03 (2025) 136 [ 2411.15300]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [ hep-th/9711200]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  22. [22]

    Superconformal Symmetry, Correlation Functions and the Operator Product Expansion

    F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Superconformal symmetry, correlation functions and the operator product expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 629 (2002) 3 [ hep-th/0112251]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  23. [23]

    Superconformal Ward Identities and their Solution

    M. Nirschl and H. Osborn, Superconformal Ward identities and their solution , Nucl. Phys. B 711 (2005) 409 [ hep-th/0407060]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  24. [24]

    Revisiting N=4 superconformal blocks

    A. Bissi and T. Lukowski, Revisiting N = 4 superconformal blocks, JHEP 02 (2016) 115 [1508.02391]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Superconformal partial waves in Grassmannian field theories

    R. Doobary and P. Heslop, Superconformal partial waves in Grassmannian field theories , JHEP 12 (2015) 159 [ 1508.03611]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Bissi, A

    A. Bissi, A. Sinha and X. Zhou, Selected topics in analytic conformal bootstrap: A guided journey, Phys. Rept. 991 (2022) 1 [ 2202.08475]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Heslop, The SAGEX Review on Scattering Amplitudes, Chapter 8: Half BPS correlators , J

    P. Heslop, The SAGEX Review on Scattering Amplitudes, Chapter 8: Half BPS correlators , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 443009 [ 2203.13019]

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    C. Beem, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees, The N = 4 Superconformal Bootstrap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 071601 [ 1304.1803]

    work page arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees, The N = 2 superconformal bootstrap, JHEP 03 (2016) 183 [ 1412.7541]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    C. Beem, L. Rastelli and B.C. van Rees, More N = 4 superconformal bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 046014 [ 1612.02363]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Chester, R

    S.M. Chester, R. Dempsey and S.S. Pufu, Bootstrapping N = 4 super-Yang-Mills on the conformal manifold, JHEP 01 (2023) 038 [ 2111.07989]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Chester, R

    S.M. Chester, R. Dempsey and S.S. Pufu, Higher-derivative corrections in M-theory from precision numerical bootstrap, 2412.14094

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Quantum Gravity from Conformal Field Theory

    F. Aprile, J.M. Drummond, P. Heslop and H. Paul, Quantum Gravity from Conformal Field Theory, JHEP 01 (2018) 035 [ 1706.02822]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Loop corrections for Kaluza-Klein AdS amplitudes

    F. Aprile, J.M. Drummond, P. Heslop and H. Paul, Loop corrections for Kaluza-Klein AdS amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2018) 056 [ 1711.03903]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    All Tree-Level Correlators in AdS${}_5\times$S${}_5$ Supergravity: Hidden Ten-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry

    S. Caron-Huot and A.-K. Trinh, All tree-level correlators in AdS 5×S5 supergravity: hidden ten-dimensional conformal symmetry , JHEP 01 (2019) 196 [ 1809.09173]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Genus-One String Amplitudes from Conformal Field Theory

    L.F. Alday, A. Bissi and E. Perlmutter, Genus-One String Amplitudes from Conformal Field Theory, JHEP 06 (2019) 010 [ 1809.10670]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Aprile, J

    F. Aprile, J. Drummond, P. Heslop and H. Paul, One-loop amplitudes in AdS 5×S5 supergravity from N = 4 SYM at strong coupling , JHEP 03 (2020) 190 [ 1912.01047]. – 73 –

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    T. Abl, P. Heslop and A.E. Lipstein, Towards the Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude in AdS 5 × S5, JHEP 04 (2021) 237 [ 2012.12091]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Aprile, J.M

    F. Aprile, J.M. Drummond, H. Paul and M. Santagata, The Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude in AdS5 × S5 and level splitting of 10d conformal symmetry , JHEP 11 (2021) 109 [2012.12092]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Huang and E.Y

    Z. Huang and E.Y. Yuan, Graviton scattering in AdS 5× S5 at two loops , JHEP 04 (2023) 064 [2112.15174]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Drummond and H

    J.M. Drummond and H. Paul, Two-loop supergravity on AdS5×S5 from CFT, JHEP 08 (2022) 275 [ 2204.01829]

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Alday, T

    L.F. Alday, T. Hansen and J.A. Silva, AdS Virasoro-Shapiro from dispersive sum rules , JHEP 10 (2022) 036 [ 2204.07542]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Alday, T

    L.F. Alday, T. Hansen and J.A. Silva, AdS Virasoro-Shapiro from single-valued periods, JHEP 12 (2022) 010 [ 2209.06223]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Alday, T

    L.F. Alday, T. Hansen and J.A. Silva, Emergent Worldsheet for the AdS Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 161603 [ 2305.03593]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Alday and T

    L.F. Alday and T. Hansen, The AdS Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude, JHEP 10 (2023) 023 [2306.12786]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Covariant Approaches to Superconformal Blocks

    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, Z.U. Khandker, D. Li, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, Covariant Approaches to Superconformal Blocks, JHEP 08 (2014) 129 [ 1402.1167]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    $\mathcal{N}=1$ Superconformal Blocks for General Scalar Operators

    Z.U. Khandker, D. Li, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, N = 1 superconformal blocks for general scalar operators, JHEP 08 (2014) 049 [ 1404.5300]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    Bootstrapping $\mathcal{N}=3$ superconformal theories

    M. Lemos, P. Liendo, C. Meneghelli and V. Mitev, Bootstrapping N = 3 superconformal theories, JHEP 04 (2017) 032 [ 1612.01536]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    D. Li, D. Meltzer and A. Stergiou, Bootstrapping mixed correlators in 4D N = 1 SCFTs , JHEP 07 (2017) 029 [ 1702.00404]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Long Multiplet Bootstrap

    M. Cornagliotto, M. Lemos and V. Schomerus, Long Multiplet Bootstrap, JHEP 10 (2017) 119 [1702.05101]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Towards general super Casimir equations for $4D$ ${\mathcal N}=1$ SCFTs

    I.A. Ram´ ırez,Towards general super Casimir equations for 4D N = 1 SCFTs, JHEP 03 (2019) 047 [ 1808.05455]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    2d small N=4 Long-multiplet superconformal block

    F. Kos and J. Oh, 2d small N=4 Long-multiplet superconformal block , JHEP 02 (2019) 001 [1810.10029]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Buric, V

    I. Buric, V. Schomerus and E. Sobko, Superconformal Blocks: General Theory, JHEP 01 (2020) 159 [ 1904.04852]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    Buri´ c, V

    I. Buri´ c, V. Schomerus and E. Sobko,The superconformal X-ing equation, JHEP 10 (2020) 147 [2005.13547]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Buri´ c, V

    I. Buri´ c, V. Schomerus and E. Sobko,Crossing symmetry for long multiplets in 4D N = 1 SCFTs, JHEP 04 (2021) 130 [ 2011.14116]

    work page arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Li, Superconformal partial waves for stress-tensor multiplet correlator in 4D N = 2 SCFTs, JHEP 05 (2020) 101 [ 1806.11550]

    Z. Li, Superconformal partial waves for stress-tensor multiplet correlator in 4D N = 2 SCFTs, JHEP 05 (2020) 101 [ 1806.11550]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Rakshit and S

    S. Rakshit and S. Mukhopadhyay, Superconformal blocks for stress-tensor and chiral – 74 – operators for 4D N = 2 superconformal field theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 567 [2301.02782]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Galperin, E

    A. Galperin, E. Ivanov, S. Kalitsyn, V. Ogievetsky and E. Sokatchev, Unconstrained N=2 Matter, Yang-Mills and Supergravity Theories in Harmonic Superspace , Class. Quant. Grav. 1 (1984) 469

    work page 1984

  59. [59]

    Howe and G.G

    P.S. Howe and G.G. Hartwell, A Superspace survey, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 1823

    work page 1995

  60. [60]

    (N,p,q) Harmonic Superspace

    G.G. Hartwell and P.S. Howe, (N, p, q) harmonic superspace , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10 (1995) 3901 [ hep-th/9412147]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  61. [61]

    AdS/SCFT in Superspace

    P.S. Howe and P.C. West, AdS / SCFT in superspace , Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 3143 [hep-th/0105218]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  62. [62]

    A note on composite operators in N=4 SYM

    P.J. Heslop and P.S. Howe, A Note on composite operators in N=4 SYM , Phys. Lett. B 516 (2001) 367 [ hep-th/0106238]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  63. [63]

    OPEs and 3-point correlators of protected operators in N=4 SYM

    P.J. Heslop and P.S. Howe, OPEs and three-point correlators of protected operators in N=4 SYM, Nucl. Phys. B 626 (2002) 265 [ hep-th/0107212]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  64. [64]

    Superfield representations of superconformal groups

    P.J. Heslop, Superfield representations of superconformal groups, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 303 [ hep-th/0108235]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  65. [65]

    Four-point functions in N=4 SYM

    P.J. Heslop and P.S. Howe, Four point functions in N=4 SYM , JHEP 01 (2003) 043 [hep-th/0211252]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    Aspects of N=4 SYM

    P.J. Heslop and P.S. Howe, Aspects of N=4 SYM , JHEP 01 (2004) 058 [ hep-th/0307210]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  67. [67]

    Alcock-Zeilinger and H

    J. Alcock-Zeilinger and H. Weigert, Compact hermitian young projection operators , Journal of Mathematical Physics 58 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Transition Operators

    J. Alcock-Zeilinger and H. Weigert, Transition Operators, J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017) 051703 [1610.08802]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Garsia and O

    A.M. Garsia and O. Egecioglu, Lectures in algebraic combinatorics, Lecture Notes in Math 2277 (2020)

    work page 2020

  70. [70]

    Unmixing Supergravity

    F. Aprile, J.M. Drummond, P. Heslop and H. Paul, Unmixing Supergravity, JHEP 02 (2018) 133 [ 1706.08456]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Aprile, J.M

    F. Aprile, J.M. Drummond, P.J. Heslop and M. Santagata, A formula for the block expansion in free CFTs and applications to N = 4 SYM at strong coupling , 2502.14077

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    Harmonic Superspaces in Low Dimensions

    P.S. Howe and M.I. Leeming, Harmonic superspaces in low dimensions , Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 2843 [ hep-th/9408062]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  73. [73]

    Aspects of the D=6, (2,0) Tensor Multiplet

    P.S. Howe, Aspects of the D = 6, (2,0) tensor multiplet , Phys. Lett. B 503 (2001) 197 [hep-th/0008048]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  74. [74]

    Aspects of superconformal field theories in six dimensions

    P.J. Heslop, Aspects of superconformal field theories in six dimensions , JHEP 07 (2004) 056 [hep-th/0405245]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  75. [75]

    Aprile and P

    F. Aprile and P. Heslop, Superconformal Blocks in Diverse Dimensions and BC Symmetric Functions, Commun. Math. Phys. 402 (2023) 995 [ 2112.12169]

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Dirac, Wave equations in conformal space , Annals Math

    P.A.M. Dirac, Wave equations in conformal space , Annals Math. 37 (1936) 429

    work page 1936

  77. [77]

    Stembridge, A characterization of supersymmetric polynomials , Journal of algebra 95 (1985) 439

    J.R. Stembridge, A characterization of supersymmetric polynomials , Journal of algebra 95 (1985) 439. – 75 –

    work page 1985

  78. [78]

    Zuckerman, Tensor products of finite and infinite dimensional representations of semisimple lie groups , Annals of Mathematics 106 (1977) 295

    G. Zuckerman, Tensor products of finite and infinite dimensional representations of semisimple lie groups , Annals of Mathematics 106 (1977) 295

    work page 1977

  79. [79]

    Jantzen, Moduln mit einem h¨ ochsten Gewicht, vol

    J.C. Jantzen, Moduln mit einem h¨ ochsten Gewicht, vol. 750 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer (1979), 10.1007/BFb0069521

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0069521 1979

  80. [80]

    Knapp and D.A

    A.W. Knapp and D.A. Vogan, Cohomological Induction and Unitary Representations , vol. 45 of Princeton Mathematical Series, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1995)

    work page 1995

Showing first 80 references.