REVIEW 2 cited by
Leaner Training, Lower Leakage: Revisiting Memorization in LLM Fine-Tuning with LoRA
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Leaner Training, Lower Leakage: Revisiting Memorization in LLM Fine-Tuning with LoRA
read the original abstract
Memorization in large language models (LLMs) makes them vulnerable to data extraction attacks. While pre-training memorization has been extensively studied, fewer works have explored its impact in fine-tuning, particularly for LoRA fine-tuning, a widely adopted parameter-efficient method. In this work, we re-examine memorization in fine-tuning and uncover a surprising divergence from prior findings across different fine-tuning strategies. Factors such as model scale and data duplication, which strongly influence memorization in pre-training and full fine-tuning, do not follow the same trend in LoRA fine-tuning. Using a more relaxed similarity-based memorization metric, we demonstrate that LoRA significantly reduces memorization risks compared to full fine-tuning, while still maintaining strong task performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Decomposing Memorization Reduction in Privacy-Preserving Fine-Tuning of SLMs for CSIRTs
Controlled experiments across 96 LoRA adapters show that reduced optimizer updates explain nearly all observed memorization drops in DP-SGD fine-tuning, HMAC pseudonymization cuts exposure 40-61% without creating new ...
-
LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion
This paper proposes a taxonomy of LLM harms in five categories and suggests mitigation strategies plus a dynamic auditing system for responsible development.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.