Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravitational Path Integral

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the problem of time and the one-dimensional Hilbert space in closed-universe quantum gravity arise from two distinct sums — over metrics and over topologies — and that both are cured by specifying an observer, with…

desk verdict A clear, honest synthesis whose headline claim is conditional: the problem-of-dimension argument depends on the ensemble-average interpretation, and the holography proposal is schematic—still worth sending to a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.21489 v1 pith:44MTUVZ4 submitted 2025-06-26 hep-th gr-qcquant-ph

Zixia Wei This is my paper
classification hep-thgr-qcquant-ph MSC 83C4581T40
keywords gravitationalpathintegralproblemoftimedimensionPage-WoottersmechanismobservertimekeeperholographyAdS/CFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Two long-standing puzzles of quantum gravity in a closed universe — the absence of time and the claim that the Hilbert space has only one state — are usually treated as two faces of the same difficulty. This paper argues that they are distinct: in a 1D gravitational path integral, summing over metrics imposes the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint and erases time, while summing over topologies with a permutation-symmetric weight collapses the Hilbert space to one dimension, provided the path integral is interpreted as an average over an ensemble of theories. The proposed cure is relational: identify a subsystem of the universe as an observer, which breaks the symmetry of the topology sum and restores a nontrivial Hilbert space; then specify the observer's history, making it a timekeeper, to break the metric sum and restore time evolution. The same move, implemented in the path integral, is claimed to yield an observer-dependent generalization of holography, with the standard AdS/CFT dictionary as the special case where the timekeeper's worldvolume is taken to infinity. A sympathetic reader would care because the paper offers one physical principle — physics is relative to who observes — that addresses both puzzles at once.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on a ladder of Hilbert spaces built from the 1D path integral: $\mathcal{H}_{\rm kin}$ from summing matter configurations, $\mathcal{H}_{\rm con}$ from group-averaging over the Hamiltonian after summing metrics, and $\mathcal{H}_{\rm fund}$ from summing topologies under the ensemble-average interpretation. Two identities do the work: $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dT \, \langle \phi_B | e^{-iTH} | \phi_A \rangle \propto \langle \phi_B | \delta(H) | \phi_A \rangle$ turns metric summation into the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint, and the permutation-symmetric decomposition $G_4(i,j,k,l) = G_2(i,j)G_2(k,l) + G_2(i,k)G_2(j,l) + G_2(i,l)G_2(j,k)$, together with its $n$-point analogues, yields $(\mathrm{Tr}\,\rho^n) = \mathrm{Tr}(\rho^n)$ and hence $\dim \mathcal{H}_{\rm fund} = 1$ per ensemble member. The cure is implemented by a path integral relative to an observer or timekeeper: the observer is an extended worldvolume $N_{\rm obs}$ whose boundary-overlap conditions select topologies, and fixing $N_{\rm obs} = N_{\rm tk}$ with a delta function $\delta(N_{\rm obs}, N_{\rm tk})$ selects metrics, defining a map $Z(N_{\rm tk})$ from histories to non-gravitational theories.

What would settle it

Compute the four-boundary amplitude $G_4$ in a UV-complete, single-theory model of closed-universe quantum gravity where wormhole contributions respect permutation symmetry, and check whether $(\mathrm{Tr}\,\rho)^2 = \mathrm{Tr}(\rho^2)$ still holds. In the 1D model this means exhibiting a regularization or contour in which $G_4$ retains its permutation-symmetric three-term form while the Gram matrix built from $G_2$ has rank greater than one; if such a case exists, the derivation that topology summing forces $\dim \mathcal{H}_{\rm fund} = 1$ fails at its central step.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the problem of time and the problem of dimension have different structural origins inside one quantization procedure. Integrating over metrics with the natural contour $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dT$ projects onto states annihilated by the Hamiltonian, producing the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint; integrating over topologies, whose permutation symmetry gives $G_4 = G_2 G_2 + G_2 G_2 + G_2 G_2$ and its higher analogues, forces, under the ensemble-average reading, each member of the ensemble to have a one-dimensional fundamental Hilbert space. The paper claims that both failures are generic rather than robust: any unbalanced weight in the metric sum violates the constraint, and any unbalanced weight in the topology sum gives nontrivial dimension. It proposes physically motivated unbalanced weights by introducing an observer as an extended matter subsystem whose existence, connectibility, replica distinguishability, and non-collision conditions select which topologies contribute, and a timekeeper as an observer whose worldvolume geometry is fixed. The resulting path integral relative to a timekeeper maps the timekeeper's history to a class of non-gravitational theories on that worldvolume, generalizing holography and reducing to the GKP-Witten formulation when the worldvolume becomes the asymptotic boundary of AdS.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the gravitational path integral with wormholes is an average over an unknown ensemble of microscopic theories; if it is instead an exact computation of a single theory, the permutation-symmetry argument no longer forces each member's fundamental Hilbert space to be one-dimensional, and the claimed origin of the problem of dimension loses its footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the 1D model, the contour $-\infty < T < \infty$ is not merely a choice: it is the choice that makes the no-boundary density matrix equal to the identity on $\mathcal{H}_{\rm con}$ and the traced no-boundary state consistent, so standard quantum-mechanical rules select the contour that produces the problem of time.
  • If topologies are summed with any weight that breaks permutation invariance — for instance the observer conditions listed in Section 4.1 — the fundamental Hilbert space regains a nontrivial dimension.
  • A timekeeper, defined by a fixed worldvolume, converts the gravitational path integral into a map from histories to path integrals; this map is the gravitational analogue of the Page-Wootters observer-to-environment map.
  • The GKP-Witten formulation of AdS/CFT is a special case of the timekeeper path integral in the limit where the timekeeper's worldvolume is taken to be the asymptotic boundary, so holography is generalized to any observer's worldvolume.
  • In the 3D model with an end-of-the-world brane as observer and a probe particle as second observer, different choices of timekeeper (brane, particle, or both) define different path integrals, making observable observer dependence explicit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper leaves implicit is a composition rule: if $Z(N_{\rm tk})$ is a map from histories to path integrals, two timekeepers should be switchable by composing two such maps, giving a gravitational analogue of quantum reference-frame switching; the paper lists this as future work rather than proving it.
  • The Appendix A rank calculations suggest a quantitative measure of how much observer is needed: a finite number of scalar species yields visible dimension $\Theta(\log(1/G_N))$ while a finite fraction of species yields $\Theta(1/G_N)$, which one could read as a resource theory of observers.
  • If observer-dependent holography is correct, then bulk reconstruction should be observer-relative in a stronger sense than in standard AdS/CFT: correlation functions defined relative to different timekeepers need not agree, and finding a concrete disagreement in the 3D model would be a sharp test.
  • The paper's ensemble-average premise implies the problem of dimension is a feature of the averaged description; if future work finds an exact single-theory dual with wormholes, the motivation for observers may shift from restoring dimension to restoring time alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a unified, relational account of two conceptual puzzles in closed-universe quantum gravity. Using a 1D gravitational path integral with matter scalars, it argues that the problem of time arises from summing over metrics (the lapse/einbein contour), while the problem of dimension arises from summing over topologies: under an ensemble-average interpretation of the multi-boundary amplitudes, permutation symmetry forces the fundamental Hilbert space to be one-dimensional. The paper then revisits the Page-Wootters mechanism, introduces a distinction between an observer (a subsystem without a specified history) and a timekeeper (an observer with a specified history), and proposes a gravitational analogue in which an observer is an extended brane whose topology-restricting conditions unbalance the topology sum, while a timekeeper is implemented by fixing the worldvolume N_tk in the path integral. It claims that this construction contains GKP-Witten AdS/CFT as an infinite-cutoff limit and therefore furnishes an observer-dependent generalization of holography. A 3D Einstein gravity model with an end-of-the-world brane is presented as a concrete arena.

Significance. If established, this would be a valuable unification: two seemingly independent puzzles would have distinct structural origins (metric sum vs. topology sum) and a common relational cure, and the Page-Wootters framework would be connected to concrete gravitational path integrals and to holography. The paper's strengths are its explicit 1D model, in which every Hilbert-space step (kinematic, constrained, fundamental) is written down; the clear Page-Wootters derivation with a 2-qubit example; the careful combinatorial analysis of observer-environment entanglement in Appendix A; and the candid acknowledgment of the ensemble-average premise at the start of Section 2.3.2. The main limitations are that the dimension claim is conditional on that contested premise, and the holography identification is asserted rather than derived. The paper is best read as a well-motivated proposal that frames future work, not as a closed proof of the full hierarchy.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3.2, Eqs. (2.30)–(2.40)] The derivation of dim H_fund = 1 is conditional on the ensemble-average reading of the gravitational path integral. The paper flags this with “under this interpretation” at the start of §2.3.2, but the abstract and §2.4 present the conclusion unconditionally (“the problem of dimension arises ... because the topologies are summed over too nicely”). Without the ensemble average, the permutation symmetry of G_{4n} is only a relation among disconnected amplitudes; it does not force the rank-one condition (2.40), and §2.3.1 shows an inconsistency of a different type. Because the observer construction in §4 is motivated by this result, the paper should either prove the rank-one statement from a premise that is independent of ensemble averaging or consistently present the whole argument as conditional, with a discussion of what remains if the ensemble-average interpretation is abandoned.
  2. [§4.2, §4.2.1, and §5.2, Eq. (4.9)] The central holography claim is not yet supported. The path integral Z(N_tk) in (4.9) fixes the worldvolume but leaves the junction/boundary conditions of environment matter on N_tk unspecified (acknowledged in footnote 9), and it still sums over bulk topologies; no argument is given that the infinite-cutoff limit with T→1 reduces this object to the GKP-Witten partition function with the standard boundary-source dictionary. The sentence in §4.2.1 that Z(N_tk) “is nothing but” the object in GKP-Witten is therefore stronger than the evidence provided. To make the identification load-bearing, specify the junction conditions, identify the saddles that dominate, and show how the limit removes the dependence on the undetermined junction data, or recast the claim as an analogy/conjecture.
  3. [§4.1 and §4.1.1] The observer conditions (existence, connectibility, replica distinguishability, no replica collision) are introduced as ad hoc restrictions on the topology sum, but no controlled prescription is given for the restricted path integral, and the paper does not demonstrate that these conditions produce a Hilbert space of dimension greater than one. In the 1D example, Eqs. (4.6)–(4.7) show factorization of the two-replica correlators, but factorization alone does not fix the rank of the physical density matrix; one needs to define and evaluate the resulting inner product or reduced state and show that its rank exceeds one. Without this step, the statement that such rules “result in a nontrivial Hilbert space” (end of §4.1) remains a proposal rather than a derivation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2.24)] The last term should presumably be G2(φA,φD)G2(φB,φC) rather than G2(φA,φD)G2(φB,φD), which double-counts D.
  2. [§5.1] “as τ goes from −τ/2 to τ/2” should read “from −π/2 to π/2”, consistent with Eq. (5.9) and the surrounding discussion.
  3. [§2.3.2, Eqs. (2.36)–(2.37)] The step from a vanishing ensemble average to a statement for each member of the ensemble assumes positive weights and a nonnegative integrand; please state this assumption explicitly.
  4. [References] Reference [68] is incomplete: it lacks a journal or arXiv identifier.
  5. [§4.2.1 and footnote 11] The phrase “N_tk, which is infinitely large” conflicts with the footnote’s more precise “start from a finite-sized N_tk and then take the large volume limit”; please harmonize the wording.
  6. [§5.2] “T Tdeformed CFT” contains a spacing typo; it should be “T\bar{T}-deformed CFT”.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation is self-contained given explicitly stated interpretive premises, with only a mild definitional flavor in the observer/timekeeper construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are a reformulation of external prior results, not self-citations. Section 2.3.2, which yields dim H_fund = 1, is explicitly labeled as an interpretation ('Under this interpretation') and is a rephrasing of arguments in [11–13], none of which are by the present author. The ensemble-average premise is a contested but openly stated assumption, not a hidden circular input. The problem of time derivation in Section 2.2 follows the standard group-averaging / WDW constraint logic and is also attributed to external work [15–17]. The proposed observer and timekeeper rules in Sections 4 and 5 are constructive: they are designed to break the permutation symmetry or the metric sum that caused the two problems, and the paper says so plainly ('The question is then to find a physically sensible reason to sum over the topologies in an unbalanced way'). Calling this 'circular' would confuse a designed ansatz with a disguised fit; the paper does not present these rules as predictions derived from independent first principles. The 'observer-dependent generalization of holography' is a re-framing that explicitly includes GKP-Witten as a special case and acknowledges existing non-codimension-one holographic examples; no load-bearing weight is placed on the single self-citation [61]. The only mild concern is definitional: the abstract defines an observer as a subsystem 'whose specification results in a nontrivial Hilbert space' and a timekeeper as one who 'experiences a nontrivial time evolution,' which states the outcome as part of the definition. However, the body of the paper supplies concrete mechanisms (topology restrictions and fixed worldvolume) that actually produce these effects, so the definition is a summary rather than the derivation itself. Overall, the derivation chain is honest and self-contained relative to its stated assumptions, with no fitted parameters or self-citation chains forcing the results.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central construction rests on standard background material (Wheeler-DeWitt constraint, group averaging, Page-Wootters decomposition) plus two interpretive choices specific to this program: the ensemble-average reading of G_n and the ad hoc topology restrictions imposed by a chosen observer. The timekeeper worldvolume N_tk and the observer conditions are hand-picked inputs, not derived. No new physical entity such as a particle, field, or dimension is postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Timekeeper worldvolume N_tk
    Chosen by hand; the entire path integral relative to a timekeeper is defined by fixing N_tk. The choice controls which history is used as a clock and which holographic dual appears.
  • Contour C = (-infinity, infinity) for the einbein/lapse integral
    Selected in Section 2.2 to produce the Wheeler-DeWitt constraint and the property in Eq. (2.23). Other contours give propagators instead of a constraint, so this choice shapes whether the problem of time appears.
  • Observer topology conditions (existence, connectibility, replica distinguishability, no replica collision)
    These four conditions in Section 4.1 are ad hoc rules that break permutation symmetry and produce a nontrivial Hilbert space. Different combinations give different physical predictions.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The multi-boundary gravitational path integral G_n obeys full permutation symmetry when all topologies are summed in a balanced way.
    Used in Section 2.3 to derive the rank-one density matrix and dim H_fund = 1. The observer conditions later break exactly this symmetry.
  • domain assumption The gravitational path integral in a closed universe is interpreted as an ensemble average over microscopic theories.
    Invoked in Section 2.3.2 to pass from averaged quantities to statements about each member of the ensemble. If this interpretation is wrong, the problem-of-dimension derivation does not go through.
  • domain assumption The Hilbert space decomposes as H_kin = H_obs tensor H_env, and the Hamiltonian splits as H = H_obs + H_env + H_int.
    This is the starting point of the Page-Wootters mechanism in Section 3.1 and is assumed without derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper An observer can be represented as an extended p-brane whose worldvolume can be identified inside the spacetime and fixed in the path integral.
    The central construction in Sections 4 and 5 rests on this modeling choice. No proof is given that a fixed worldvolume defines a consistent restricted gravitational path integral.
  • ad hoc to paper The fixed-worldvolume path integral Z(N_tk) defines a non-gravitational theory on N_tk, with the GKP-Witten AdS/CFT dictionary recovered in the infinite-volume limit.
    This is asserted in Sections 4.2.1 and 5.2 by analogy with known cutoff-AdS holography, not derived from a concrete matching of partition functions.
  • ad hoc to paper The 1D path integral results extend to higher dimensions.
    Section 2.4 states the extension is straightforward, but the higher-dimensional Hilbert-space construction and the topology sum are not carried out.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravitational Path Integral." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/44MTUVZ4

@misc{pith2026250621489,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observers and Timekeepers: From the Page-Wootters Mechanism to the Gravitational Path Integral},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/44MTUVZ4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.21489}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum gravity in a closed universe faces two a priori distinct yet seemingly related issues: the problem of time and the fact that its Hilbert space dimension is one. Both have been argued to be resolvable by formulating physics relative to an observer. Using a simple gravitational path integral model, we explain that the two issues arise from two distinct non-perturbative effects: the former from summing over metrics and the latter from summing over topologies. We then revisit the Page-Wootters mechanism, one of the earliest frameworks for formulating quantum mechanics relative to an observer, see how it applies to both issues, and introduce some new ingredients. In particular, we emphasize a hierarchy between an observer and a timekeeper. An observer is a subsystem of the universe whose specification results in a nontrivial Hilbert space, while a timekeeper is an observer with a specified history that can be used as a reference for the time of the environment and experiences a nontrivial time evolution. Finally, we propose a method for incorporating observers and timekeepers into the gravitational path integral and show that implementing a timekeeper in this way furnishes an observer-dependent generalization of holography.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.21489 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Three examples of geometries with different topologies contributing to the gravi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The left shows a 1D manifold connecting two points and its 2D analogue , and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The no-boundary wave function is defined by summing over geometries and field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The no-boundary density matrix is defined by summing over geometries and field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: All the three topologies contributing to the 1D gravitational path integral with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An image of the PW mechanism. The wave function of the universe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Relational path integral, effective actions and quantum frame covariance in gravity

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The gravitational path integral is reformulated with dynamical reference frames, producing gauge-invariant correlators, frame-dependent vacua, and effective actions, with sharpness of events becoming frame-relative.

  2. A de Sitter Anti-Scrambling Algebra

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In a toy model of de Sitter quantum gravity, shockwave time advances break the KMS condition and prevent the Hartle-Hawking state from being a trace on the observer's crossed-product algebra.

  3. Junctions, strings, clocks and gravitational memory in three dimensional dS space

    hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Transient closed-string fluctuations in dS3 are shown order by order to be encoded in gravitational junction shifts at I±, with the monotonic time shift forming an emergent clock.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [22]

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu and A. Levine, The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view , JHEP 05 (2025) 059 [ 2501.02632]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    B. S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory , Phys. Rev. 160 (1967) 1113

    work page 1967

  3. [2]

    J. A. Wheeler, SUPERSPACE AND THE NATURE OF QUANTUM GEOMETRODYNAMICS, Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 27

    work page 1987

  4. [3]

    K. V. Kuchar, Time and interpretations of quantum gravity , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20 (2011) 3

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    C. J. Isham, Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time , NATO Sci. Ser. C 409 (1993) 157 [ gr-qc/9210011]

    arXiv 1993

  6. [5]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [ hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1999

  7. [6]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory , Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105 [ hep-th/9802109]. 41

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

Show all 78 references
  1. [8]

    Chowdhury, V

    C. Chowdhury, V. Godet, O. Papadoulaki and S. Raju, Holography from the Wheeler-DeWitt equation, JHEP 03 (2022) 019 [ 2107.14802]

    2022 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Araujo-Regado, R

    G. Araujo-Regado, R. Khan and A. C. Wall, Cauchy slice holography: a new AdS/CFT dictionary, JHEP 03 (2023) 026 [ 2204.00591]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Witten, A note on the canonical formalism for gravity , Adv

    E. Witten, A note on the canonical formalism for gravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27 (2023) 311 [ 2212.08270]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Marolf and H

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information , JHEP 08 (2020) 044 [2002.08950]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Usatyuk, Z.-Y

    M. Usatyuk, Z.-Y. Wang and Y. Zhao, Closed universes in two dimensional gravity , SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 051 [ 2402.00098]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Usatyuk and Y

    M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao, Closed universes, factorization, and ensemble averaging , JHEP 02 (2025) 052 [ 2403.13047]

    2025 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Popescu, A

    S. Popescu, A. J. Short and A. Winter, Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics, Nat. Phys. 2 (2006) 754 [ 0511225]

    2006

  8. [15]

    J. J. Halliwell, Derivation of the Wheeler-De Witt Equation from a Path Integral for Minisuperspace Models, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 2468

    1988

  9. [16]

    J. J. Halliwell and J. B. Hartle, Wave functions constructed from an invariant sum over histories satisfy constraints , Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 1170

    1991

  10. [17]

    D. Marolf, Group averaging and refined algebraic quantization: Where are we now? , in 9th Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation and Relativistic Field Theories (MG 9) , 7, 2000, gr-qc/0011112

    2000 arXiv

  11. [18]

    D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, EVOLUTION WITHOUT EVOLUTION: DYNAMICS DESCRIBED BY STATIONARY OBSER V ABLES, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2885

    1983

  12. [19]

    W. K. Wootters, “Time” replaced by quantum correlations , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 23 (1984) 701. 42

    1984

  13. [20]

    Balasubramanian, Y

    V. Balasubramanian, Y. Nomura and T. Ugajin, De Sitter space is sometimes not empty, JHEP 02 (2024) 135 [ 2308.09748]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Harlow, M

    D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao, Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe , 2501.02359

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Blommaert, J

    A. Blommaert, J. Kudler-Flam and E. Y. Urbach, Absolute entropy and the observer’s no-boundary state, 2505.14771

  16. [24]

    H. Z. Chen, Observers seeing gravitational Hilbert spaces: abstract sources for an abstract path integral, 2505.15892

  17. [25]

    Nomura and T

    Y. Nomura and T. Ugajin, Nonperturbative Quantum Gravity in a Closed Lorentzian Universe, 2505.20390

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    ’t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity , Conf

    G. ’t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity , Conf. Proc. C930308 (1993) 284 [gr-qc/9310026]

    1993 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Susskind, The World as a hologram , J

    L. Susskind, The World as a hologram , J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089]

    1995 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Aharonov and L

    Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind, Charge Superselection Rule, Phys. Rev. 155 (1967) 1428

    1967

  21. [29]

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph and R. W. Spekkens, Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information , Reviews of Modern Physics 79 (2007) 555

    2007

  22. [30]

    Gour and R

    G. Gour and R. W. Spekkens, The resource theory of quantum reference frames: manipulations and monotones , New Journal of Physics 10 (2008) 033023

    2008

  23. [31]

    Giacomini, E

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz and v. Brukner, Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames , Nature Commun. 10 (2019) 494 [1712.07207]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Vanrietvelde, P

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. Hoehn, F. Giacomini and E. Castro-Ruiz, A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework , Quantum 4 (2020) 225 [ 1809.00556]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    P. A. Hoehn, A. R. H. Smith and M. P. E. Lock, Trinity of relational quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 066001 [ 1912.00033]. 43

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Goeller, P

    C. Goeller, P. A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin, Diffeomorphism-invariant observables and dynamical frames in gravity: reconciling bulk locality with general covariance , 2206.01193

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    De Vuyst, S

    J. De Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin, Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent, 2405.00114

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Kirklin, Generalised second law beyond the semiclassical regime , 2412.01903

    J. Kirklin, Generalised second law beyond the semiclassical regime , 2412.01903

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Leutheusser and H

    S. Leutheusser and H. Liu, Causal connectability between quantum systems and the black hole interior in holographic duality , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 086019 [2110.05497]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    S. A. W. Leutheusser and H. Liu, Emergent Times in Holographic Duality , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 086020 [ 2112.12156]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Witten, Why Does Quantum Field Theory In Curved Spacetime Make Sense? And What Happens To The Algebra of Observables In The Thermodynamic Limit? , 2112.11614

    E. Witten, Why Does Quantum Field Theory In Curved Spacetime Make Sense? And What Happens To The Algebra of Observables In The Thermodynamic Limit? , 2112.11614

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten, An algebra of observables for de Sitter space , JHEP 02 (2023) 082 [ 2206.10780]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Witten, Algebras, regions, and observers

    E. Witten, Algebras, regions, and observers. , Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 107 (2024) 247 [2303.02837]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007, 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

    2007 doi

  35. [43]

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Wave Function of the Universe , Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2960

    1983

  36. [44]

    Ivo, Y.-Z

    V. Ivo, Y.-Z. Li and J. Maldacena, The no boundary density matrix , JHEP 02 (2025) 124 [2409.14218]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko and J. Maldacena, Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states, JHEP 02 (2021) 009 [ 2007.16091]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A. G. Cohen, G. W. Moore, P. C. Nelson and J. Polchinski, An Off-Shell Propagator for String Theory , Nucl. Phys. B 267 (1986) 143. 44

    1986

  39. [47]

    M. J. Strassler, Field theory without Feynman diagrams: One loop effective actions , Nucl. Phys. B 385 (1992) 145 [ hep-ph/9205205]

    1992 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Casali, D

    E. Casali, D. Marolf, H. Maxfield and M. Rangamani, Baby universes and worldline field theories, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 134004 [ 2101.12221]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Banihashemi and T

    B. Banihashemi and T. Jacobson, On the lapse contour in the gravitational path integral, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 066014 [ 2405.10307]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    S. R. Coleman, Black holes as red herrings: Topological fluctuations and the loss of quantum coherence, Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 867

    1988

  43. [51]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Loss of incoherence and determination of coupling constants in quantum gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 854

    1988

  44. [52]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral , 1903.11115

    1903 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Akers, N

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, D. Harlow, G. Penington and S. Vardhan, The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity , JHEP 06 (2024) 155 [ 2207.06536]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Salecker and E

    H. Salecker and E. P. Wigner, Quantum limitations of the measurement of space-time distances, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 571

    1958

  47. [55]

    Peres, Measurement of time by quantum clocks , American Journal of Physics 48 (1980) 552

    A. Peres, Measurement of time by quantum clocks , American Journal of Physics 48 (1980) 552

    1980

  48. [56]

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, Time and the Interpretation of Canonical Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 2598

    1989

  49. [57]

    A. R. Brown and A. Dahlen, On ’nothing’ as an infinitely negatively curved spacetime , Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104026 [ 1111.0301]

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Alishahiha, A

    M. Alishahiha, A. Karch, E. Silverstein and D. Tong, The dS/dS correspondence, AIP Conf. Proc. 743 (2004) 393 [ hep-th/0407125]

    2004 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Susskind, Black Holes Hint towards De Sitter Matrix Theory , Universe 9 (2023) 368 [2109.01322]

    L. Susskind, Black Holes Hint towards De Sitter Matrix Theory , Universe 9 (2023) 368 [2109.01322]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Narovlansky and H

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter holography , JHEP 05 (2025) 032 [ 2310.16994]

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    I. Akal, Y. Kusuki, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei, Codimension two holography for wedges, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 126007 [ 2007.06800]. 45

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Miao, Codimension-n holography for cones , Phys

    R.-X. Miao, Codimension-n holography for cones , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 086031 [2101.10031]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Maldacena, Vacuum decay into Anti de Sitter space , 1012.0274

    J. Maldacena, Vacuum decay into Anti de Sitter space , 1012.0274

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    Sugimoto and Y.-k

    S. Sugimoto and Y.-k. Suzuki, End of the world branes from dimensional reduction , JHEP 03 (2024) 165 [ 2312.07891]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    McGough, M

    L. McGough, M. Mezei and H. Verlinde, Moving the CFT into the bulk with T T , JHEP 04 (2018) 010 [ 1611.03470]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Caputa, S

    P. Caputa, S. Datta and V. Shyam, Sphere partition functions \& cut-off AdS , JHEP 05 (2019) 112 [ 1902.10893]

    2019 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Hartman, J

    T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Holography at finite cutoff with a T 2 deformation, JHEP 03 (2019) 004 [ 1807.11401]

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Rothlin, Bridging quantum error correction, gauge theories and quantum reference frames,

    E. Rothlin, Bridging quantum error correction, gauge theories and quantum reference frames,

  61. [69]

    Carrozza, A

    S. Carrozza, A. Chatwin-Davies, P. A. Hoehn and F. M. Mele, A correspondence between quantum error correcting codes and quantum reference frames , 2412.15317

  62. [70]

    Almheiri, X

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2015) 163 [ 1411.7041]

    2015 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Pastawski, B

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence , JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [ 1503.06237]

    2015 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Harlow, The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction , Commun

    D. Harlow, The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction , Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 865 [ 1607.03901]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory , J. Stat. Mech. 2004 (2004) P06002

    2004

  66. [74]

    Lewkowycz and J

    A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [1304.4926]

    2013 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior , JHEP 03 (2022) 205 [ 1911.11977]. 46

    2022 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation , JHEP 05 (2020) 013 [1911.12333]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [ hep-th/0603001]

    2006 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy , JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [ hep-th/0605073]. 47

    2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.