REVIEW 8 cited by
Generalist Reward Models: Found Inside Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Generalist Reward Models: Found Inside Large Language Models
read the original abstract
The alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is critically dependent on reward models trained on costly human preference data. While recent work explores bypassing this cost with AI feedback, these methods often lack a rigorous theoretical foundation. In this paper, we discover that a powerful generalist reward model is already latently present within any LLM trained via standard next-token prediction. We prove that this endogenous reward is not a heuristic, but is theoretically equivalent to a reward function learned through offline inverse reinforcement learning. This connection allows us to directly elicit a high-quality reward signal from a base (pre-trained or supervised fine-tuned) model without any further training. Critically, we also prove that subsequent reinforcement learning using this endogenous reward leads to a policy with a provably superior error bound compared to the base model. To our best knowledge, this is the first theoretical proof of the effectiveness of reinforcement learning for LLMs. Our experiments validate this theory, demonstrating that our method not only outperforms existing LLM-as-a-judge approaches but can also surpass explicitly trained reward models. These findings suggest that the reward modeling stage can be replaced by a principled method of eliciting the knowledge already captured during pre-training, heralding a more efficient, powerful, and scalable paradigm for LLMs alignment as well as multi-modal models.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Momentum for Reasoning: Dense Intrinsic Signals in Policy Optimization
ISPO densifies GRPO rewards with sequence-level informativeness and token-level directional signals from policy probabilities to reduce zero-advantage collapse and hallucinated certainty on math benchmarks.
-
LC-ERD: Mining Latent Logic for Self-Evolving Reasoning via Consistency-Regulated Reward Decomposition
LC-ERD frames LLM self-alignment as latent structure mining via a Variational Logic Potential and Multi-Agent Value Decomposition to provide granular, logic-consistent supervision.
-
Unleashing Implicit Rewards: Prefix-Value Learning for Distribution-Level Optimization
IPVRM learns prefix values to produce reliable step rewards from sequence outcomes using TD learning, enabling distribution-level RL that improves reasoning when paired with calibrated rewards.
-
Unleashing Implicit Rewards: Prefix-Value Learning for Distribution-Level Optimization
Learning prefix-conditioned success probabilities from outcome labels yields more reliable process rewards than sequence log-ratio PRMs and improves RL when used for candidate-token TD updates.
-
REAR: Test-time Preference Realignment through Reward Decomposition
REAR decomposes the reward into question and preference components, rescales their balance, and expresses the result as a linear combination of token log-probabilities for efficient integration with best-of-N and tree search.
-
Trust Region On-Policy Distillation
TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.
-
Directional Alignment Mitigates Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning for Language Models
Trusted-direction projection constrains RL gradient updates in language models to a low-dimensional clean subspace, reducing reward hacking on mathematical reasoning tasks.
-
A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.