pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2507.10459 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-14 · ✦ hep-th · hep-lat· math-ph· math.MP

Discrete p-Form Symmetry and Higher Coulomb Phases

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-latmath-phmath.MP
keywords p-form symmetryCoulomb phasehigher-form gauge theorydiscrete symmetryinfrared phasesAbelian electrodynamicslattice gauge theory
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A field theory with a discrete Z_N p-form symmetry generically admits a Coulomb phase where the infrared theory is Abelian p-form electrodynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that any field theory equipped with a Z_N p-form symmetry can enter one of three phases: Higgs, confining, or Coulomb. In the Coulomb phase the long-distance physics reduces to free Abelian p-form gauge theory. This extends the familiar phase diagram of ordinary gauge theories to higher-form symmetries. The claim is supported by explicit continuum and lattice constructions that realize all three phases.

Core claim

A field theory with a Z_N p-form symmetry generically admits, in addition to a Higgs phase and a confining phase, a Coulomb phase in which the infrared theory contains Abelian p-form electrodynamics, similar to the behaviour of Yang-Mills theory coupled to adjoint or fundamental matter.

What carries the argument

The discrete Z_N p-form symmetry, which remains exact and unbroken and thereby restricts the allowed infrared phases to include a Coulomb phase with massless p-form fields.

If this is right

  • The infrared effective theory contains free massless Abelian p-form gauge fields.
  • The phase structure mirrors that of ordinary gauge theories coupled to matter.
  • Both continuum and lattice models can be built to realize the Coulomb phase explicitly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Higher-form symmetries could be used to protect Coulomb-like infrared phases in a wider range of quantum field theories.
  • Analogous phase structures may appear in condensed-matter systems that realize discrete higher-form symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

The discrete p-form symmetry remains exact and unbroken in the infrared, forcing the theory into one of three phases without other dynamical effects dominating.

What would settle it

A concrete field theory with an exact unbroken Z_N p-form symmetry whose infrared limit lacks Abelian p-form electrodynamics would falsify the generic claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10459 by Hyungrok Kim, Leron Borsten.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An example of a tiling of ℝ3 , using rhombic triacontahedra. (Credit: Françoise Delpérée, Wikimedia Commons). • If both 𝜙 and 𝐽 acquire vacuum expectation values, then we obtain a U(1) gauge theory perturbed by monopole operators: 𝑆 = ∫ 1 2𝑔 2 𝐴 d𝐴 ∧ ★d𝐴 + 𝐴˜ ∧ 𝐽 + · · · . The term 𝐴˜ ∧ 𝐽 may be relevant [3, 4] and lead to unbroken ℤ𝑁 one-form symmetry. (Note that, in the case 𝑝 + 2 = 𝑑, then one can gener… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We argue that a field theory with a $\mathbb Z_N$ $p$-form symmetry generically admits, in addition to a Higgs phase and a 'confining' phase, a Coulomb phase in which the infrared theory contains Abelian $p$-form electrodynamics, similar to the behaviour of Yang-Mills theory coupled to adjoint or fundamental matter. We illustrate our claim with continuum and lattice examples.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that a field theory with a discrete ℤ_N p-form symmetry generically admits three phases—a Higgs phase, a confining phase, and a Coulomb phase whose infrared theory contains free Abelian p-form electrodynamics—analogous to the phase structure of Yang-Mills theory with adjoint or fundamental matter. The claim is illustrated through specific continuum and lattice constructions rather than derived from a general classification of infrared theories consistent with the symmetry.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would extend the known phase taxonomy for theories with higher-form symmetries and clarify how discrete p-form symmetries can protect a massless p-form photon in the infrared. Concrete continuum and lattice realizations are provided, which could serve as starting points for further studies of duality and confinement in generalized-symmetry settings.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the ℤ_N p-form symmetry 'generically admits' a Coulomb phase is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet it rests on explicit examples; the manuscript does not supply a general argument showing why other symmetry-preserving relevant operators or strong-coupling fixed points cannot gap the would-be massless p-form gauge field while preserving the symmetry.
  2. [Lattice examples] Lattice constructions: the emergence of the Coulomb phase must be shown to survive generic deformations that preserve the exact ℤ_N p-form symmetry; without an explicit check that the lattice action does not introduce symmetry-allowed mass terms or confine the p-form photon, the step from tuned examples to the generic statement remains incomplete.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Terminology] The quotation marks around 'confining' phase suggest a non-standard usage; a short clarification of the precise infrared behavior (e.g., area-law vs. perimeter-law for appropriate operators) would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised help clarify the scope of our claims. We have revised the abstract and added discussion in the relevant sections to address the concerns about generality and robustness. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the ℤ_N p-form symmetry 'generically admits' a Coulomb phase is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet it rests on explicit examples; the manuscript does not supply a general argument showing why other symmetry-preserving relevant operators or strong-coupling fixed points cannot gap the would-be massless p-form gauge field while preserving the symmetry.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this distinction. Our use of 'generically' is meant to convey that the symmetry permits a Coulomb phase and that this phase arises in standard constructions without additional fine-tuning, in analogy with the Coulomb phase of Yang-Mills theory with matter. We do not claim to have performed a complete classification of all possible infrared theories consistent with the symmetry, nor do we assert that the Coulomb phase is the only possible phase. In the revised manuscript we have updated the abstract to state that the Coulomb phase is realized in explicit continuum and lattice examples. We have also added a paragraph in the introduction that discusses leading symmetry-preserving relevant operators and explains why they do not gap the p-form photon within the models we consider. A general no-go result or exhaustive classification of all symmetry-compatible fixed points lies beyond the scope of the present work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Lattice examples] Lattice constructions: the emergence of the Coulomb phase must be shown to survive generic deformations that preserve the exact ℤ_N p-form symmetry; without an explicit check that the lattice action does not introduce symmetry-allowed mass terms or confine the p-form photon, the step from tuned examples to the generic statement remains incomplete.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating stability under generic symmetry-preserving deformations strengthens the claim. In the lattice models the exact ℤ_N p-form symmetry forbids local mass terms for the p-form gauge field. We have added an explicit discussion in the lattice section of the revised manuscript showing that the leading symmetry-allowed operators are either irrelevant in the infrared or do not produce confinement of the p-form photon. For the concrete actions we study, the Coulomb phase persists under small deformations that preserve the symmetry. While we have not performed an exhaustive scan of all possible higher-order terms, the symmetry itself protects the massless photon at long distances. This limitation is now noted in the text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Symmetry-based phase classification with explicit examples shows no circularity

full rationale

The manuscript argues that a discrete ℤ_N p-form symmetry permits three IR phases (Higgs, confining, Coulomb with free Abelian p-form electrodynamics) by direct appeal to symmetry constraints and then illustrates the claim with concrete continuum and lattice constructions. No step equates a derived quantity to its own input by definition, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or reduces the central claim to a self-citation chain whose content is unverified. The generalization from examples to the generic case rests on standard field-theory reasoning about allowed relevant operators rather than on any self-referential construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the existence of an exact discrete p-form symmetry and on the standard assumption that the infrared phase structure is dictated by that symmetry in the manner of ordinary gauge theories.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The theory possesses an exact ℤ_N p-form symmetry that constrains the possible infrared phases.
    Invoked when stating that the symmetry generically admits the three phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5585 in / 1222 out tokens · 37142 ms · 2026-05-19T04:48:23.854767+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Nguy˜ên, Tin Sulejmanpašić, and Mithat Ünsal

    Mendel T. Nguy˜ên, Tin Sulejmanpašić, and Mithat Ünsal. Phases of theories with ℤ𝑁 1-form symmetry, and the roles of center vortices and magnetic monopoles. PhysicalReviewLetters , 134(14):141902, April2025. arXiv:2401.04800, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.141902

  2. [2]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    Davide Silvano Achille Gaiotto, Anton Nikolaevich Kapustin (Антон Николаевич Капустин), Nathan Seiberg, and Brian Willett. Generalized global symmetries. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015(02):172, February 2015. arXiv:1412.5148, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172

  3. [3]

    Quark confine- ment and topology of gauge groups.Nuclear Physics B, 120(3):429–458, March 1977

    Alexander Markovich Polyakov (Александр Маркович Поляков). Quark confine- ment and topology of gauge groups.Nuclear Physics B, 120(3):429–458, March 1977. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90086-4

  4. [4]

    Compact gauge fields and the infrared catastrophe

    Alexander Markovich Polyakov (Александр Маркович Поляков). Compact gauge fields and the infrared catastrophe. Physics Letters B, 59(1):82–84, October 1975. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90162-8

  5. [5]

    On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement

    Gerardus ’t Hooft. On the phase transition towards permanent quark confinement. Nuclear Physics B, 138(1):1–25, June 1978.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90153-0

  6. [6]

    New Look at QED$_4$: the Photon as a Goldstone Boson and the Topological Interpretation of Electric Charge

    Alexander Kovner and Baruch Rosenstein. New look at QED4: The photon as a Goldstone boson and the topological interpretation of electric charge.Physical Review D, 49(10):5571–5581, May 1994. arXiv:hep-th/9210154, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.49.5571

  7. [7]

    Discrete gauge theories

    Mark de Wild Propitius and Ferdinand Alexander Bais. Discrete gauge theories. In Gordon Walter Semenoff and Luc Vinet, editors,Particles and Fields, CRM Series in Mathematical Physics, pages 353–439. Springer, December 1998.arXiv:hep-th/ 9511201, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1410-6_8

  8. [8]

    New order parameters for non-abelian gauge theories

    Mark Gower Alford and John David March-Russell. New order parameters for non-abelian gauge theories. Nuclear Physics B, 369(1–2):276–298, January 1992. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90387-Q. 14

  9. [9]

    On Detecting Discrete Cheshire Charge

    Martin Aaron Bucher, Kai-Ming Lee (李啟明), and John Phillip Preskill. On detecting discrete Cheshire charge.Nuclear Physics B, 386(1):27–42, November 1992.arXiv: hep-th/9112040, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90174-A

  10. [10]

    Quantum Field Theory of Nonabelian Strings and Vortices

    Mark Gower Alford, Kai-Ming Lee (李 啟 明), John David March-Russell, and John Phillip Preskill. Quantum field theory of non-abelian strings and vor- tices. Nuclear Physics B, 384(1–2):251–317, October 1992.arXiv:hep-th/9112038, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(92)90468-Q

  11. [11]

    Notes on gauging noneffective group actions

    Tony G. Pantev and Eric Redmund Sharpe. Notes on gauging noneffective group actions, February 2005. arXiv:hep-th/0502027, doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/ 0502027

  12. [12]

    GLSM's for gerbes (and other toric stacks)

    Tony G. Pantev and Eric Redmund Sharpe. GLSMs for gerbes (and other toric stacks). Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 10(1):77–121, 2006.arXiv: hep-th/0502053, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2006.v10.n1.a4

  13. [13]

    Cluster decomposition, T-duality, and gerby CFT's

    Simeon Hellerman, André Gil Henriques, Tony G. Pantev, Eric Redmund Sharpe, and Matthew Ando. Cluster decomposition, T-duality, and gerby CFTs.Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 11(5):751–818, 2007.arXiv:hep-th/0606034, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2007.v11.n5.a2

  14. [14]

    A symmetry principle for Topological Quantum Order

    Zohar Nussinov and Gerardo Ortíz. A symmetry principle for topological quantum order. Annals of Physics, 324(5):977–1057, May 2009.arXiv:cond-mat/0702377, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2008.11.002

  15. [15]

    Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories

    Anton Nikolaevich Kapustin (Антон Николаевич Капустин) and Ryan Thorngren. Higher symmetry and gapped phases of gauge theories. In Denis Auroux, Lud- milVasilevKatzarkov( Людмил Василев Кацарков),TonyG. Pantev,YanSergeevich Soibelman (Яков Сергеевич Сойбельман), and Yuri Tschinkel (Юрий Чинкель ), editors,Algebra,Geometry,andPhysicsinthe21stCentury: Konts...

  16. [16]

    arXiv:1309.4721, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59939-7_5

  17. [17]

    Dumitrescu,KennethA

    ClayCórdova,ThomasT. Dumitrescu,KennethA. Intriligator,andShu-HengShao( 邵 書珩). Snowmass white paper: Generalized symmetries in quantum field theory and beyond, May 2022.arXiv:2205.09545, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2205.09545

  18. [18]

    Introduction to generalized global symmetries in QFT and particle physics, June 2023

    Theodore Daniel Brennan and Sungwoo Hong (홍성ᄋ ᅮ). Introduction to generalized global symmetries in QFT and particle physics, June 2023. arXiv:2306.00912, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.00912

  19. [19]

    An introduction to higher-form symmetries.SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 74:1–56, September 2023.arXiv:2303.01817, doi:10.21468/ SciPostPhysLectNotes.74

    Pedro Rogério Sérgi Gomes. An introduction to higher-form symmetries.SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 74:1–56, September 2023.arXiv:2303.01817, doi:10.21468/ SciPostPhysLectNotes.74

  20. [20]

    Lectures on Generalized Symmetries

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Lea E. Bottini, Ludovic Fraser-Taliente, Liam Gladden, Dewi Sid William Gould, Arthur Platschorre, and Hannah Tillim. Lectures on generalized symmetries. Physics Reports, 1051:1–87, February 2024.arXiv:2307.07547, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.002

  21. [21]

    Lecture notes on generalized symmetries and applications.Physics Reports, 1065:1–43, May 2024

    Ran Luo (罗然), Qing-Rui Wang (王晴睿), and Yi-Nan Wang (王一男). Lecture notes on generalized symmetries and applications.Physics Reports, 1065:1–43, May 2024. arXiv:2307.09215, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.02.002. 15

  22. [22]

    Topological Quantum Field Theory, Nonlocal Operators, and Gapped Phases of Gauge Theories

    Sergei Gennadievich Gukov (Сергей Г еннадьевич Гуков) and Anton Nikolaevich Kapustin (Антон Николаевич Капустин). Topological quantum field theory, non- local operators, and gapped phases of gauge theories, July 2013.arXiv:1307.4793, doi:10.48550/arXiv.1307.4793

  23. [23]

    Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases

    Maissam Barkeshli, Parsa Hassan Bonderson, Meng Cheng (程蒙), and Zhenghan Wang (王正汉). Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases. Physical Review B, 100(11):115147, September 2019. arXiv:1410.4540, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115147

  24. [24]

    Surface Operators

    Sergei Gennadievich Gukov (Сергей Г еннадьевич Гуков). Surface operators. In Jörg Teschner, editor,New Dualities of Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, Mathematical Physics Studies, pages 223–259. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, November 2015. arXiv:1412.7127, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18769-3_8

  25. [25]

    Michael C. Ogilvie. Phases of gauge theories.Journal of Physics A, 45(48):483001, December 2012. arXiv:1211.2843, doi:10.1088/1751-8113/45/48/483001

  26. [26]

    The Center symmetry and its spontaneous breakdown at high temperatures

    Kieran Michael Holland and Uwe-Jens Wiese. The center symmetry and its spontan- eous breakdown at high temperatures. In Mikhail Arkadyevich Shifman (Михаил Аркадьевич Шифман), editor,At the Frontier of Particle Physics. Boris Ioffe Festschrift, pages 1909–1944. World Scientific, Singapore, April 2001.arXiv:hep-ph/0011193, doi:10.1142/9789812810458_0040

  27. [27]

    Unifying monopole and center vortex as the semiclassical confinement mechanism.Physical Review Letters, 133(17):171902, October 2024.arXiv:2405.12402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133

    Yui Hayashi (林優依) and Yuya Tanizaki (谷崎佑弥). Unifying monopole and center vortex as the semiclassical confinement mechanism.Physical Review Letters, 133(17):171902, October 2024.arXiv:2405.12402, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133. 171902

  28. [28]

    Yui Hayashi (林優依), Tatsuhiro Misumi (三角樹弘), and Yuya Tanizaki (谷崎佑 弥). Monopole-vortex continuity of𝒩 = 1super Yang-Mills theory onℝ2 × 𝑆1 × 𝑆1 with ’t Hooft twist.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2025(05):194, May 2025.arXiv: 2410.21392, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025)194

  29. [29]

    Giansiracusa, David Lanners, and Tin Sulejmanpašić

    Jeffrey H. Giansiracusa, David Lanners, and Tin Sulejmanpašić. Emergent photons and mechanisms of confinement, April 2025.arXiv:2505.00079, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2505.00079

  30. [30]

    An Invitation to Higher Gauge Theory

    John Carlos Baez and John Huerta. An invitation to higher gauge theory.General Relativity and Gravitation, 43:2335–2392, August 2011.arXiv:1003.4485, doi:10. 1007/s10714-010-1070-9

  31. [31]

    Higher gauge theory

    Leron Borsten, Mehran Jalali Farahani, Branislav Jurčo, Hyungrok Kim (金炯錄), Jiří Nárožný, Dominik Rist, Christian Sämann, and Martin Wolf. Higher gauge theory. In Richard Joseph Szabo and Martin Bojowald, editors,Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics. Volume 4, pages 159–185. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, second editio...

  32. [32]

    Differential Geometry of Gerbes

    Lawrence Breen and William Messing. Differential geometry of gerbes.Advances in Mathematics, 198(2):732–846, December 2005.arXiv:math/0106083, doi:10.1016/j. aim.2005.06.014. 16

  33. [33]

    Nonabelian Bundle Gerbes, their Differential Geometry and Gauge Theory

    PaoloAschieri,LuigiCantini,andBranislavJurčo. Nonabelianbundlegerbes,theirdif- ferentialgeometryandgaugetheory. CommunicationsinMathematicalPhysics ,254:367– 400, March 2005.arXiv:hep-th/0312154, doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1220-6

  34. [34]

    Higher Gauge Theory: 2-Connections on 2-Bundles

    JohnCarlosBaezandUrsSchreiber. Highergaugetheory: 2-connectionson2-bundles, December 2004. arXiv:hep-th/0412325, doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0412325

  35. [35]

    Higher Gauge Theory

    John Carlos Baez and Urs Schreiber. Higher gauge theory. In Alexei Alexandrovich Davydov (Алексей Александрович Давыдов), Michael AlexandrovichBatanin (Ми- хаил Александрович Батанин), Michael Sterling James Johnson, Stephen Lack, and Amnon Neeman, editors,Categories in Algebra, Geometry and Mathematical Physics. Conference and Workshop in Honor of Ross S...

  36. [36]

    Canonical gauges in higher gauge theory

    Andreas Gastel. Canonical gauges in higher gauge theory. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 376(2):1053–1071, June 2020.arXiv:1810.06278, doi:10.1007/ s00220-019-03530-4

  37. [37]

    TowardsanM5-branemodelII: Metricstring structures

    ChristianSämannandLennartSchmidt. TowardsanM5-branemodelII: Metricstring structures. Fortschritte der Physik, 68(8):2000051, August 2020.arXiv:1908.08086, doi:10.1002/prop.202000051

  38. [38]

    L-infinity algebra connections and applications to String- and Chern-Simons n-transport

    Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber, and James Dillon Stasheff.𝐿∞-algebra connections and applications toString- and Chern-Simons𝑛-transport. In Bertfried Fauser, Jürgen Tolksdorf, and Eberhard Zeidler, editors,Quantum Field Theory: Competitive Models, pages 303–424. Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, December 2009.arXiv:0801.3480, doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8736-5_17

  39. [39]

    Twisted differential String and Fivebrane structures

    Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber, and James Dillon Stasheff. Differential twistedString and Fivebranestructures. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 315(1):169–213, October 2012. arXiv:0910.4001, doi:10.1007/s00220-012-1510-3

  40. [40]

    Twisted Weil algebras for the string Lie 2-algebra.Fortschritte der Physik, 67(8–9):1910016, August–September 2019.arXiv:1903.02873, doi:10.1002/ prop.201910016

    Lennart Schmidt. Twisted Weil algebras for the string Lie 2-algebra.Fortschritte der Physik, 67(8–9):1910016, August–September 2019.arXiv:1903.02873, doi:10.1002/ prop.201910016

  41. [41]

    Adjusted parallel transport for higher gauge theories.Journal of Physics A, 53(44):445206, November 2020.arXiv: 1911.06390, doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab8ef2

    Hyungrok Kim (金炯錄) and Christian Sämann. Adjusted parallel transport for higher gauge theories.Journal of Physics A, 53(44):445206, November 2020.arXiv: 1911.06390, doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab8ef2

  42. [42]

    𝐸𝐿∞-algebras, generalized geometry, and tensor hierarchies, May 2021.arXiv:2106.00108, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.00108

    Leron Borsten, Hyungrok Kim (金炯錄), and Christian Sämann. 𝐸𝐿∞-algebras, generalized geometry, and tensor hierarchies, May 2021.arXiv:2106.00108, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.00108

  43. [43]

    Chern correspondence for higher principal bundles, October 2023

    Roberto Téllez-Domínguez. Chern correspondence for higher principal bundles, October 2023. arXiv:2310.12738, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.12738

  44. [44]

    Adjusted connections I: Differential cocycles for principal groupoid bundleswithconnection,June2024

    Simon-Raphael Fischer, Mehran Jalali Farahani, Hyungrok Kim (金炯錄), and Chris- tian Sämann. Adjusted connections I: Differential cocycles for principal groupoid bundleswithconnection,June2024. arXiv:2406.16755, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2406. 16755. 17

  45. [45]

    Principal 3-bundles with adjusted connections, May 2025.arXiv:2505.13368, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2505.13368

    Gianni Gagliardo, Christian Sämann, and Roberto Téllez-Domínguez. Principal 3-bundles with adjusted connections, May 2025.arXiv:2505.13368, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2505.13368

  46. [46]

    Adjusted connections ii: Differential cocycles for higher principal bundles with connections

    Simon-RaphaelFischer,MehranJalaliFarahani,HyungrokKim,andChristianSämann. Adjusted connections ii: Differential cocycles for higher principal bundles with connections. To appear

  47. [47]

    Explicit non-Abelian gerbes with connections, February 2022.arXiv:2203.00092, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.00092

    Dominik Rist, Christian Sämann, and Martin Wolf. Explicit non-Abelian gerbes with connections, February 2022.arXiv:2203.00092, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.00092

  48. [48]

    The non-abelian self-dual string.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 110(5):1001–1042, May 2020.arXiv:1705.02353, doi:10.1007/ s11005-019-01250-3

    Christian Sämann and Lennart Schmidt. The non-abelian self-dual string.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 110(5):1001–1042, May 2020.arXiv:1705.02353, doi:10.1007/ s11005-019-01250-3

  49. [49]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity

    Thomas Israel Banks and Nathan Seiberg. Symmetries and strings in field theory and gravity. Physical Review D, 83(8):084019, April 2011. arXiv:1011.5120, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.084019

  50. [50]

    Iterated integrals of differential forms and loop space homology

    Kuo-Tsai Chen (陳國才). Iterated integrals of differential forms and loop space homology. Annals of Mathematics, 97(2):217–246, March 1973.doi:10.2307/1970846

  51. [51]

    Reduced bar constructions on deRham complexes

    Kuo-Tsai Chen (陳國才). Reduced bar constructions on deRham complexes. In Alex Heller and Myles Tierney, editors,Algebra, Topology, and Category Theory: A Collection of Papers in Honor of Samuel Eilenberg, New York, United States of America, 1976. Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-339050-9.50007-9

  52. [52]

    Cyclic homology and equivariant homology.Inventiones Mathematicae, 87(2):403–423, June 1987.doi:10.1007/BF01389424

    John David Stuart Jones. Cyclic homology and equivariant homology.Inventiones Mathematicae, 87(2):403–423, June 1987.doi:10.1007/BF01389424

  53. [53]

    Ezra Getzler, John David Stuart Jones, and Scott B. Petrack. Differential forms on loop spaces and the cyclic bar complex.Topology, 30(3):339–371, November 1991. doi:10.1016/0040-9383(91)90019-Z

  54. [54]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UnitedKingdom,December2001

    Allen Edward Hatcher.Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UnitedKingdom,December2001. URL: https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/ AT/ATpage.html

  55. [55]

    Theoryofone-andtwo-dimensionalmagnetswithaneasymagnetiz- ation plane

    JacquesVillain. Theoryofone-andtwo-dimensionalmagnetswithaneasymagnetiz- ation plane. II. The planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet.Le Journal de Physique, 36(6):581–590, June 1975.doi:10.1051/jphys:01975003606058100

  56. [56]

    Quark confinement and vortices in massive gauge-invariant QCD

    John Michael Cornwall. Quark confinement and vortices in massive gauge-invariant QCD. Nuclear Physics B, 157(3):392–412, October 1979.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79) 90111-1

  57. [57]

    A quantum liquid model for the QCD vacuum: Gauge and rotational invariance of domained and quantized homogeneous color fields

    Holger Bech Nielsen and Poul Olesen. A quantum liquid model for the QCD vacuum: Gauge and rotational invariance of domained and quantized homogeneous color fields. Nuclear Physics B, 160(2):380–396, December 1979. doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(79)90065-8

  58. [58]

    Abelian gauge theories on the lattice: $\theta$-terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles

    Tin Sulejmanpašić and Christof Gattringer. Abelian gauge theories on the lattice:𝜃- terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles.Nuclear Physics B, 943:114616, June 2019. arXiv:1901.02637, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114616. 18

  59. [59]

    A modified Villain formulation of fractons and other exotic theories.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 62(10):102301, October 2021.arXiv:2103.01257, doi:10.1063/ 5.0060808

    Pranay Gorantla, Ho Tat Lam (林顥達), Nathan Seiberg, and Shu-Heng Shao (邵書 珩). A modified Villain formulation of fractons and other exotic theories.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 62(10):102301, October 2021.arXiv:2103.01257, doi:10.1063/ 5.0060808. 19