pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2507.13240 · v3 · submitted 2025-07-17 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

Thermal Radiation from an Analytic Hydrodynamic Model with Hadronic and QGP Sources in Heavy-Ion Collisions

G\'abor L\'aszl\'o Kasza This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th
keywords heavy-ion collisionsthermal photonsquark-gluon plasmahydrodynamic modeldirect photonsphase transitionPHENIX data
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

An analytic hydrodynamic model with QGP and hadronic photon sources reproduces measured direct photon spectra in Au+Au collisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a fully analytic description of thermal photon production by combining a known solution of relativistic hydrodynamics with an equation of state in the class favored by lattice QCD. The construction includes the transition from quark-gluon plasma to hadronic matter and calculates photon emission from both phases. When the resulting spectra are compared with PHENIX non-prompt direct photon data for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV, the model matches the measurements across a range of centralities. This agreement makes it possible to extract the initial temperature as a function of collision centrality.

Core claim

Based on a previously published analytic solution of relativistic hydrodynamics that incorporates a lattice-QCD-like equation of state, a completely analytic model is constructed for thermal photon production that accounts for the quark-hadron transition. The model reproduces the measured non-prompt direct photon spectra in Au+Au collisions at √s_NN = 200 GeV, thereby enabling the investigation of the centrality dependence of the initial temperature.

What carries the argument

The analytic hydrodynamic solution together with photon emission rates from both the quark-gluon plasma and hadronic phases, integrated across the phase transition.

If this is right

  • Thermal photons become a practical probe of the initial temperature's dependence on collision centrality.
  • The model supplies a benchmark for future calculations of thermal radiation in heavy-ion collisions.
  • The analytic form allows rapid evaluation of photon yields without numerical hydrodynamics.
  • The approach can be applied to other beam energies once the corresponding hydrodynamic solutions are available.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same analytic framework could be used to test the sensitivity of photon spectra to different treatments of the phase transition.
  • If the centrality trend in initial temperature holds, it would constrain models of the early-stage energy deposition.
  • Extension to smaller collision systems might reveal whether the hydrodynamic description remains valid at lower multiplicities.

Load-bearing premise

The previously published hydrodynamic solution and the selected equation of state correctly describe the space-time evolution and the quark-hadron transition, while the photon emission rates are taken as given inputs.

What would settle it

Direct photon spectra measured at additional centralities or collision energies that lie significantly outside the model's predicted range would falsify the agreement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13240 by G\'abor L\'aszl\'o Kasza.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The fit of equation (33) to the non-prompt direct photon spectrum measured by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The fit of equation (33) to the non-prompt direct photon spectrum measured by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The fit of equation (33) to the non-prompt direct photon spectrum measured by the PHENIX [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The fit of equation (33) to the non-prompt direct photon spectrum measured by the PHENIX [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Extracted initial temperatures as a function of centrality, obtained from comparisons between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In high-energy heavy-ion collisions, a nearly perfect fluid is formed, known as the strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma (QGP). After a short thermalization period, the evolution of this medium can be described by the equations of relativistic hydrodynamics. As the system expands and cools, the QGP undergoes a transition into hadronic matter, marking the onset of quark confinement. Direct photons offer insights into an essential stage of evolution, spanning from the onset of thermalization to the suppression of thermal photon production, which occurs within the hadronic phase. This paper builds upon and extends a previously published solution of relativistic hydrodynamics, incorporating an equation of state that falls within the same class as that predicted by lattice QCD. Based on this solution, a completely analytic model is constructed to describe thermal photon production, accounting for the quark-hadron transition. The model is tested against PHENIX measurements of non-prompt direct photon spectra in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Good agreement is observed between the model predictions and the experimental data, enabling the investigation of the centrality dependence of the initial temperature. These results provide a benchmark for future theoretical and experimental studies of thermal radiation in heavy-ion collisions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a completely analytic model for thermal photon production from both QGP and hadronic sources in heavy-ion collisions. It extends a previously published relativistic hydrodynamic solution that employs an equation of state in the lattice-QCD class, integrates standard emission rates over the resulting analytic temperature and flow profiles, and reports good agreement with PHENIX non-prompt direct photon spectra in Au+Au collisions at √s_NN = 200 GeV. This agreement is then used to extract the centrality dependence of the initial temperature.

Significance. If the analytic profiles faithfully reproduce the space-time evolution of the prior hydrodynamic solution and the emission rates are accurate, the work supplies a useful benchmark that permits rapid, transparent calculations of thermal photon yields and their centrality dependence without repeated full numerical hydro runs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and comparison with data] The central claim of spectral agreement with PHENIX data and the extracted initial-temperature centrality dependence rests on the accuracy of the space-time profiles taken from the previously published hydrodynamic solution. The manuscript presents no quantitative comparison (e.g., in the results section or an appendix) between the analytic temperature and flow fields and the original numerical solution, nor any sensitivity test to plausible variations in the hydrodynamic evolution. This omission is load-bearing because even modest deviations in the early-time temperature or flow would alter the integrated photon yield and undermine the reported agreement.
  2. [Model construction] The photon emission rates from both the QGP and hadronic phases are adopted as fixed external inputs without additional validation or uncertainty propagation within this work. Because the analytic model does not re-derive or vary these rates, any systematic uncertainty in the rates directly affects the claimed data agreement and the centrality-dependent initial temperatures; a brief sensitivity study or reference to rate uncertainties would be required to support the conclusions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the model is 'completely analytic' yet the hydrodynamic solution itself is taken from prior numerical work; a short clarifying sentence on what is newly analytic versus inherited would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results and comparison with data] The central claim of spectral agreement with PHENIX data and the extracted initial-temperature centrality dependence rests on the accuracy of the space-time profiles taken from the previously published hydrodynamic solution. The manuscript presents no quantitative comparison (e.g., in the results section or an appendix) between the analytic temperature and flow fields and the original numerical solution, nor any sensitivity test to plausible variations in the hydrodynamic evolution. This omission is load-bearing because even modest deviations in the early-time temperature or flow would alter the integrated photon yield and undermine the reported agreement.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative comparison between the analytic profiles and the numerical hydrodynamic solution would improve transparency and support the central claims. Although the analytic solution was constructed to reproduce the numerical evolution (as derived and validated in the referenced prior work), we will add this comparison to the revised manuscript. Specifically, we will include a new appendix with plots or tables quantifying the relative differences in temperature and radial flow velocity at representative proper times and radii. We will also add a brief discussion of sensitivity to plausible variations in the hydrodynamic evolution, referencing the parameter studies performed in the original numerical work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model construction] The photon emission rates from both the QGP and hadronic phases are adopted as fixed external inputs without additional validation or uncertainty propagation within this work. Because the analytic model does not re-derive or vary these rates, any systematic uncertainty in the rates directly affects the claimed data agreement and the centrality-dependent initial temperatures; a brief sensitivity study or reference to rate uncertainties would be required to support the conclusions.

    Authors: The rates employed are the standard QGP rate of Arnold, Moore, and Yaffe and the hadronic rate parametrization widely used in the literature. We will revise the manuscript to include explicit references to existing discussions of systematic uncertainties in these rates (e.g., from recent reviews on thermal photon production). While a comprehensive re-derivation or full Monte-Carlo propagation of rate uncertainties lies outside the scope of the present analytic-model paper, we will add a short paragraph estimating the effect of plausible rate variations on the extracted initial temperatures to better contextualize the results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Photon spectra agreement and initial temperature extraction depend on accuracy of prior hydrodynamic solution taken as fixed input

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "This paper builds upon and extends a previously published solution of relativistic hydrodynamics, incorporating an equation of state that falls within the same class as that predicted by lattice QCD. Based on this solution, a completely analytic model is constructed to describe thermal photon production, accounting for the quark-hadron transition. The model is tested against PHENIX measurements of non-prompt direct photon spectra in Au+Au collisions at √s_NN = 200 GeV. Good agreement is observed between the model predictions and the experimental data, enabling the investigation of the central-"

    The load-bearing step imports the entire space-time evolution and temperature/flow profiles from the prior hydrodynamic solution as given inputs. The photon spectra are then integrated using standard QGP and hadronic rates and labeled 'model predictions' that agree with data. Because the prior solution is not re-derived or validated against independent benchmarks inside this manuscript, the reported spectral agreement and initial-temperature extraction are statistically forced by the imported profiles rather than emerging from a self-contained derivation.

full rationale

The paper constructs an analytic photon production model directly from a previously published hydrodynamic solution and standard emission rates, then reports agreement with PHENIX non-prompt direct photon data as validation. This agreement and the extracted centrality dependence of initial temperature are presented as model predictions, but the space-time evolution, temperature profiles, and EOS class are imported without re-derivation or sensitivity tests here. The result therefore reduces in part to the validity of the prior solution's parameters (likely tuned to other data), making the photon comparison less independent than claimed. No machine-checked or externally falsifiable derivation of the hydro profiles is provided within this work, supporting a moderate circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit list of free parameters or axioms; the hydrodynamic solution and photon rates are imported from prior literature whose details are not restated here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5757 in / 1129 out tokens · 22866 ms · 2026-05-19T04:36:45.471616+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 54 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. A. Lacey, N. N. Ajitanand, J. M. Alexander, P. Chung, W. G. Holzmann, M. Issah, A. Tara- nenko, P. Danielewicz, and H. Stoecker. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007), p. 092301. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.98.092301. arXiv: nucl-ex/0609025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    G. D´ avid. In: Rept. Prog. Phys. 83.4 (2020), p. 046301. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/ab6f57. arXiv: 1907.08893 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab6f57 2020

  3. [3]

    E. V. Shuryak and L. Xiong. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993), pp. 2241–2244. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett.70.2241. arXiv: hep-ph/9301218. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    K. Tuchin. In: Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011), p. 017901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.017901 . arXiv: 1008.1604 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.83.017901 2011

  5. [5]

    The Glasma, Photons and the Implications of Anisotropy

    L. McLerran and B. Schenke. In: Nucl. Phys. A 929 (2014), pp. 71–82. doi: 10 . 1016 / j . nuclphysa.2014.06.004. arXiv: 1403.7462 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    B. G. Zakharov. In: JETP Lett. 104.4 (2016), pp. 213–217. doi: 10.1134/S0021364016160025 . arXiv: 1607.04314 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1134/s0021364016160025 2016

  7. [7]

    Prompt photon yield and elliptic flow from gluon fusion induced by magnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    A. Ayala, J. D. Castano-Yepes, C. A. Dominguez, L. A. Hernandez, S. Hernandez-Ortiz, and M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans. In: Phys. Rev. D 96.1 (2017). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 119901 (2017)], p. 014023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.014023. arXiv: 1704.02433 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.014023 2017

  8. [8]

    Parametric estimate of the relative photon yields from the Glasma and the Quark-Gluon Plasma in heavy-ion collisions

    J. Berges, K. Reygers, N. Tanji, and R. Venugopalan. In: Phys. Rev. C 95.5 (2017), p. 054904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054904. arXiv: 1701.05064 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.054904 2017

  9. [9]

    C. Gale, J. F. Paquet, B. Schenke, and C. Shen. In: Phys. Rev. C 105.1 (2022), p. 014909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014909. arXiv: 2106.11216 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.014909 2022

  10. [10]

    A. Monnai. In: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37.11n12 (2022), p. 2230006.doi: 10.1142/S0217751X2230006X. arXiv: 2203.13208 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x2230006x 2022

  11. [11]

    Garcia-Montero, A

    O. Garcia-Montero, A. Mazeliauskas, P. Plaschke, and S. Schlichting. In: PoS HardProbes2023 (2024), p. 075. doi: 10.22323/1.438.0075. arXiv: 2312.10098 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.438.0075 2024

  12. [12]

    Garcia-Montero, A

    O. Garcia-Montero, A. Mazeliauskas, P. Plaschke, and S. Schlichting. In: EPJ Web Conf. 296 (2024), p. 07003. doi: 10.1051/epjconf/202429607003. arXiv: 2404.02861 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202429607003 2024

  13. [13]

    N. J. Abdulameer et al. In: Phys. Rev. C 109.4 (2024), p. 044912. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109. 044912. arXiv: 2203.17187 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.109 2024

  14. [14]

    Universal Parametrization of Thermal Photon Rates in Hadronic Matter

    M. Heffernan, P. Hohler, and R. Rapp. In: Phys. Rev. C 91.2 (2015), p. 027902. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevC.91.027902. arXiv: 1411.7012 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Pseudo-Critical Enhancement of Thermal Photons in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

    H. van Hees, M. He, and R. Rapp. In: Nucl. Phys. A 933 (2015), pp. 256–271. doi: 10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2014.09.009. arXiv: 1404.2846 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2015

  16. [16]

    Elliptic flow from thermal photons with magnetic field in holography

    B. M¨ uller, S. Y. Wu, and D. L. Yang. In: Phys. Rev. D 89.2 (2014), p. 026013. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.89.026013. arXiv: 1308.6568 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    Conformal anomaly as a source of soft photons in heavy ion collisions

    G. Basar, D. Kharzeev, and V. Skokov. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012), p. 202303. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.109.202303. arXiv: 1206.1334 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    The Magneto-Sono-Luminescence and its signatures in photon and dilepton production in heavy ion collisions

    G. Basar, D. E. Kharzeev, and E. V. Shuryak. In: Phys. Rev. C 90.1 (2014), p. 014905. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.014905. arXiv: 1402.2286 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.90.014905 2014

  19. [19]

    Equation of state and initial temperature of quark gluon plasma at RHIC

    M. Csan´ ad and I. M´ ajer. In:Central Eur. J. Phys. 10 (2012), pp. 850–857. doi: 10.2478/s11534- 012-0060-9. arXiv: 1101.1279 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.2478/s11534- 2012

  20. [20]

    Initial temperature and EoS of quark matter from direct photons

    M. Csan´ ad and I. M´ ajer. In: Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 8.9 (2011), pp. 1013–1015. doi: 10.1134/ S1547477111090147. arXiv: 1101.1280 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    G. Kasza. In: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39.01 (2024), p. 2450006. doi: 10.1142/S0217751X24500064. arXiv: 2311.03568 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x24500064 2024

  22. [22]

    L¨ ok¨ os and G

    S. L¨ ok¨ os and G. Kasza. In: Eur. Phys. J. A 61.7 (2025), p. 157. doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050- 025-01625-2. arXiv: 2403.13599 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050- 2025

  23. [23]

    R. Esha. In: Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 16.1 (2023), 1–A128. doi: 10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.16.1- A128. arXiv: 2212.09953 [nucl-ex]. 20

    work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.16.1- 2023

  24. [24]

    M. Orosz. In: PoS QNP2024 (2025), p. 141. doi: 10.22323/1.465.0141

    work page doi:10.22323/1.465.0141 2025

  25. [25]

    C. Shen, U. W. Heinz, J. F. Paquet, and C. Gale. In: Phys. Rev. C 89.4 (2014), p. 044910. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044910. arXiv: 1308.2440 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.89.044910 2014

  26. [26]

    Photon elliptic flow in relativistic heavy-ion collisions: hadronic versus partonic sources

    O. Linnyk, V. P. Konchakovski, W. Cassing, and E. L. Bratkovskaya. In: Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013), p. 034904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034904. arXiv: 1304.7030 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.034904 2013

  27. [27]

    J. F. Paquet. In: Nucl. Phys. A 967 (2017), pp. 184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.06

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.06 2017

  28. [28]

    arXiv: 1704.07842 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Massen, G

    O. Massen, G. Nijs, M. Sas, W. van der Schee, and R. Snellings. In: Eur. Phys. J. C 85.4 (2025), p. 388. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14072-6 . arXiv: 2412.09671 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14072-6 2025

  30. [30]

    J. I. Kapusta, P. Lichard, and D. Seibert. In: Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 47, 4171 (1993)], pp. 2774–2788. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.4171

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.4171 1991

  31. [32]

    R. C. Hwa. In: Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974), p. 2260. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2260

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2260 1974

  32. [33]

    J. D. Bjorken. In: Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983), pp. 140–151. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.27.140

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.140 1983

  33. [34]

    F. D. Steffen and M. H. Thoma. In: Phys. Lett. B 510 (2001). [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 660, 604–606 (2008)], pp. 98–106. doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00525-1. arXiv: hep-ph/0103044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(01)00525-1 2001

  34. [35]

    Hadronic and partonic sources of direct photons in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    O. Linnyk, V. Konchakovski, T. Steinert, W. Cassing, and E. L. Bratkovskaya. In: Phys. Rev. C 92.5 (2015), p. 054914. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054914. arXiv: 1504.05699 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.92.054914 2015

  35. [36]

    D. K. Srivastava. In: Eur. Phys. J. C 10 (1999). [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 20, 399–400 (2001)], pp. 487–490. doi: 10.1007/s100520050772. arXiv: nucl-th/0103023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s100520050772 1999

  36. [37]

    Hadronic Production of Thermal Photons

    S. Turbide, R. Rapp, and C. Gale. In: Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004), p. 014903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC. 69.014903. arXiv: hep-ph/0308085

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc 2004

  37. [38]

    C. Gale. In: PoS High-pT2017 (2019), p. 023. doi: 10.22323/1.320.0023 . arXiv: 1802.00128 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.320.0023 2019

  38. [39]

    C. Gale, Y. Hidaka, S. Jeon, S. Lin, J. F. Paquet, R. D. Pisarski, D. Satow, V. V. Skokov, and G. Vujanovic. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015), p. 072301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.072301 . arXiv: 1409.4778 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.072301 2015

  39. [40]

    Anisotropic flow of thermal photons at RHIC and LHC

    R. Chatterjee, P. Dasgupta, and D. K. Srivastava. In: Phys. Rev. C 96.1 (2017), p. 014911. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014911. arXiv: 1702.02378 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.014911 2017

  40. [41]

    Direct photon production in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\rm{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

    J. Adam et al. In: Phys. Lett. B 754 (2016), pp. 235–248.doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.01.020. arXiv: 1509.07324 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.01.020 2016

  41. [42]

    Direct photon elliptic flow in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

    S. Acharya et al. In: Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019), pp. 308–322. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018. 11.039. arXiv: 1805.04403 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018 2019

  42. [43]

    New exact solutions of relativistic hydrodynamics for longitudinally expanding fireballs

    T. Cs¨ org˝ o, G. Kasza, M. Csan´ ad, and Z. Jiang. In:Universe 4.6 (2018), p. 69. doi: 10.3390/ universe4060069. arXiv: 1805.01427 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [44]

    The QCD equation of state with dynamical quarks

    Sz. Bors´ anyi, G. Endr˝ odi, Z. Fodor, A. Jakov´ ac, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K.” Szab´ o. In: JHEP 11 (2010), p. 077. doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2010)077. arXiv: 1007.2580 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2010)077 2010

  44. [45]

    New exact solutions of hydrodynamics for rehadronizing fireballs with lattice QCD equation of state

    T. Cs¨ org˝ o and G. Kasza. In:24th Low-x Meeting . 2016. arXiv: 1610.02197 [nucl-th]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [46]

    Scaling properties of spectra in new exact solutions of rotating, multi-component fireball hydrodynamics

    T. Cs¨ org˝ o and G. Kasza. In:Universe 4.4 (2018), p. 58. doi: 10.3390/universe4040058. arXiv: 1801.05716 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3390/universe4040058 2018

  46. [47]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe. In: JHEP 12 (2001), p. 009. doi: 10.1088/1126- 6708/2001/12/009. arXiv: hep-ph/0111107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126- 2001

  47. [48]

    Thermal photons from heavy ion collisions: A spectral function approach

    K. Dusling and I. Zahed. In: Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010), p. 054909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.82. 054909. arXiv: 0911.2426 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.82 2010

  48. [49]

    M. Dion, J. F. Paquet, B. Schenke, C. Young, S. Jeon, and C. Gale. In: Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011), p. 064901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.064901. arXiv: 1109.4405 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.84.064901 2011

  49. [50]

    Effective QCD and transport description of dilepton and photon production in heavy-ion collisions and elementary processes

    O. Linnyk, E. L. Bratkovskaya, and W. Cassing. In: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 87 (2016), pp. 50–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.12.003. arXiv: 1512.08126 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.12.003 2016

  50. [51]

    J. F. Paquet, C. Shen, G. S. Denicol, M. Luzum, B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale. In: Phys. Rev. C 93.4 (2016), p. 044906. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044906. arXiv: 1509.06738 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.044906 2016

  51. [52]

    Cooper and G

    F. Cooper and G. Frye. In: Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974), p. 186. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.186

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.186 1974

  52. [53]

    A new and finite family of solutions of hydrodynamics: Part II: Advanced estimate of initial energy densities

    G. Kasza and T. Cs¨ org˝ o. In:13th Workshop on Particle Correlations and Femtoscopy . 2018. doi: 10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.12.175. arXiv: 1806.11309 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.12.175 2018

  53. [54]

    Kasza and T

    G. Kasza and T. Cs¨ org˝ o. In: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34.26 (2019), p. 1950147. doi: 10 . 1142 / S0217751X19501471. arXiv: 1811.09990 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [55]

    Azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au collisions at sqrtsNN = 200 GeV

    J. Adams et al. In: Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005), p. 014904. doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevC . 72 . 014904. arXiv: nucl-ex/0409033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  55. [56]

    Scaling properties of azimuthal anisotropy in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV

    A. Adare et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007), p. 162301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.162301. arXiv: nucl-ex/0608033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.162301 2007

  56. [57]

    Elliptic flow of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV

    K Aamodt et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010), p. 252302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105. 252302. arXiv: 1011.3914 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105 2010

  57. [58]

    Flow Study in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions by Fourier Expansion of Azimuthal Particle Distributions

    S. Voloshin and Y. Zhang. In: Z. Phys. C 70 (1996), pp. 665–672. doi: 10.1007/s002880050141. arXiv: hep-ph/9407282

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s002880050141 1996

  58. [59]

    K. H. Ackermann et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001), pp. 402–407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 86.402. arXiv: nucl-ex/0009011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2001

  59. [60]

    P. K. Sahu, N. Otuka, and A. Ohnishi. In: (2002). arXiv: nucl-th/0206010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  60. [61]

    Systematic Studies of Elliptic Flow Measurements in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV

    S. Afanasiev et al. In: Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009), p. 024909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.024909 . arXiv: 0905.1070 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.80.024909 2009

  61. [62]

    Richardson

    E. Richardson. In: PoS QNP2012 (2012). Ed. by Bernard Pire, p. 146.doi: 10.22323/1.157.0146. arXiv: 1206.3501 [nucl-ex]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.157.0146 2012

  62. [63]

    A. K. Yadav, P. P. Bhaduri, and S. Chattopadhyay. In: Eur. Phys. J. C 85.3 (2025), p. 247. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14018-y . arXiv: 2503.02297 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14018-y 2025

  63. [64]

    S. Ryu, S. Jeon, C. Gale, and C. Schenke B.and Young. In: Nucl. Phys. A 904-905 (2013), pp. 389c– 392c. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.02.031. arXiv: 1210.4588 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.02.031 2013

  64. [65]

    Suppression of elliptic flow in a minimally viscous quark-gluon plasma

    H. Song and U. W. Heinz. In: Phys. Lett. B 658 (2008), pp. 279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb. 2007.11.019. arXiv: 0709.0742 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2008

  65. [66]

    Causal viscous hydrodynamics in 2+1 dimensions for relativistic heavy-ion collisions

    H. Song and U. W. Heinz. In: Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008), p. 064901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77. 064901. arXiv: 0712.3715 [nucl-th]. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.77 2008

  66. [67]

    Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program

    L. Adamczyk et al. In: Phys. Rev. C 96.4 (2017), p. 044904. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044904. arXiv: 1701.07065 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.044904 2017

  67. [68]

    Hagedorn

    R. Hagedorn. In: Nuovo Cim. Suppl. 3 (1965), pp. 147–186

    work page 1965

  68. [69]

    Different Hagedorn temperatures for mesons and baryons from experimental mass spectra, compound hadrons, and combinatorial saturation

    W. Broniowski and W. Florkowski. In: Phys. Lett. B 490 (2000), pp. 223–227. doi: 10.1016/ S0370-2693(00)00992-8. arXiv: hep-ph/0004104

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  69. [70]

    Update of the Hagedorn mass spectrum

    W. Broniowski, W. Florkowski, and L. Ya. Glozman. In: Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004), p. 117503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.117503. arXiv: hep-ph/0407290

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.117503 2004

  70. [71]

    T. D. Cohen and V. Krejcirik. In: J. Phys. G 39 (2012), p. 055001. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/ 39/5/055001. arXiv: 1107.2130 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/ 2012

  71. [72]

    The Hagedorn temperature Revisited

    J. Cleymans and D. Worku. In: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26 (2011), pp. 1197–1209. doi: 10.1142/ S0217732311035584. arXiv: 1103.1463 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [73]

    Kiyomichi

    A. Kiyomichi. In: 20th Lake Louise Winter Institute: Fundamental Interactions . 2005, pp. 184–

    work page 2005

  73. [74]

    doi: 10.1142/9789812774422_0023

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812774422_0023

  74. [75]

    Acharya et al

    S. Acharya et al. In: (2025). arXiv: 2504.04796 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [76]

    Electromagnetic radiation from nuclear collisions at RHIC energies

    S. Turbide, C. Gale, E. Frodermann, and U. Heinz. In: Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008), p. 024909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024909. arXiv: 0712.0732 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.77.024909 2008

  76. [77]

    Enhanced production of direct photons in Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV and implications for the initial temperature

    A. Adare et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010), p. 132301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104. 132301. arXiv: 0804.4168 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104 2010

  77. [78]

    Measurement of Direct Photons in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV

    S. Afanasiev et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012), p. 152302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109. 152302. arXiv: 1205.5759 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109 2012

  78. [79]

    Csan´ ad, M

    M. Csan´ ad, M. I. Nagy, Z. Jiang, and T. Cs¨ org˝ o. In:Phys. Part. Nucl. 51.3 (2020), pp. 274–277. doi: 10.1134/S1063779620030090. arXiv: 1910.04660 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063779620030090 2020

  79. [80]

    Csan´ ad, M

    M. Csan´ ad, M. I. Nagy, Z. F. Jiang, and T. Cs¨ org˝ o. In:Gribov-90 Memorial Volume, pp. 275-296 (2021). doi: 10.1142/9789811238406_0024. arXiv: 1909.02498 [nucl-th]

    work page doi:10.1142/9789811238406_0024 2021

  80. [81]

    Cs¨ org˝ o and G

    T. Cs¨ org˝ o and G. Kasza. In: Gribov-90 Memorial Volume, pp. 297-318 (2021). doi: 10.1142/ 9789811238406_0025. arXiv: 2003.08859 [nucl-th]. 23

    work page arXiv 2021