pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.14015 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-18 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th· nucl-th· quant-ph

Anomalous-magnetic-moment-enhanced Casimir effect

Daisuke Fujii , Katsumasa Nakayama , Kei Suzuki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 03:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-thnucl-thquant-ph
keywords Casimir effectanomalous magnetic momentDirac fermionsLandau levelsLifshitz formulamagnetic fieldsvacuum energy
0
0 comments X

The pith

The anomalous magnetic moment of Dirac fermions increases the fermionic Casimir energy under magnetic fields, with strong enhancement from the gapless lowest Landau level when the moment is large.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the Lifshitz formula to include the anomalous magnetic moment term for Dirac fermions in a uniform magnetic field. It demonstrates that this term raises the overall Casimir energy, and that sufficiently large values produce a marked increase because the lowest Landau level becomes gapless. The work supplies numerical estimates for electrons, muons, and constituent quarks and notes possible consequences at nonzero temperature and density.

Core claim

Incorporating the anomalous magnetic moment into the Lifshitz formula for the fermionic Casimir effect shows that the energy increases with the size of the moment. When the moment is large enough, the gapless dispersion of the lowest Landau level produces a significant enhancement of the Casimir energy.

What carries the argument

Extension of the Lifshitz formula that adds the anomalous magnetic moment to the Dirac fermion energy eigenvalues while retaining the standard sum over Landau levels and Matsubara frequencies.

If this is right

  • The Casimir energy rises monotonically with increasing anomalous magnetic moment.
  • When the moment exceeds a threshold set by the magnetic field strength, the lowest Landau level contributes a gapless term that dominates the enhancement.
  • Numerical values can be obtained for electrons, muons, and constituent quarks at laboratory or astrophysical field strengths.
  • Finite temperature and density modify the enhanced energy through the same Landau-level structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar enhancements could appear in other vacuum-energy calculations that rely on Landau-level sums in strong fields.
  • The gapless lowest level may alter the equation of state for dense matter in magnetized environments.
  • The same formula structure could be tested by varying the effective moment through external parameters rather than particle species.

Load-bearing premise

The standard Lifshitz summation formula remains valid after the anomalous magnetic moment term is added to the fermion dispersion in a uniform magnetic field.

What would settle it

A direct numerical evaluation or lattice simulation of the Casimir energy for Dirac fermions that shows the energy stays flat or decreases as the anomalous magnetic moment is increased.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.14015 by Daisuke Fujii, Katsumasa Nakayama, Kei Suzuki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Examples of dispersion relations in massive Dirac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Semi-log plot of Casimir energy enhancement ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Log-log plot of Casimir energy enhancement ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Casimir energy enhancement ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Casimir energy enhancement ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Casimir coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Magnetic-field dependence of effective masses of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We theoretically investigate the impact of the anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) of Dirac fermions on the fermionic Casimir effect under magnetic fields. We formulate it as an extension of the well-known Lifshitz formula. From our formula, we find that the AMM increases the fermionic Casimir energy. In particular, when the AMM is large enough, the Casimir energy is significantly enhanced by the gapless behavior of the lowest Landau level. We also quantitatively estimate the Casimir energy from electron, muon, and constituent quark fields under magnetic fields and propose possible phenomena at finite temperature and fermion density.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the standard Lifshitz formula to include the anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) of Dirac fermions in a uniform external magnetic field B. It reports that the AMM increases the fermionic Casimir energy, with a significant enhancement arising from the gapless dispersion of the lowest Landau level (LLL) once the AMM parameter is large enough that kappa B approaches the effective mass. Quantitative estimates are supplied for electrons, muons, and constituent quarks, together with brief remarks on finite-temperature and finite-density extensions.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result identifies a concrete mechanism by which AMM can amplify vacuum energies in strong magnetic fields, with possible relevance to magnetized neutron-star crusts or heavy-ion collisions. The quantitative estimates for three distinct fermion species provide a practical starting point for phenomenology, and the link to gapless LLL behavior connects the Casimir problem to other magnetized fermionic systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Formulation of the modified Lifshitz formula] The extension of the Lifshitz formula incorporates AMM-shifted Landau levels of the form E_n(p_z) = sqrt(p_z^2 + (m_eff - kappa B delta_{n,0})^2 + ...). When kappa B approaches m the LLL dispersion becomes linear, altering both the density of states and the ultraviolet convergence of the Matsubara-frequency integral. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the standard subtraction (or contour deformation) continues to cancel the free-space divergence without generating additional finite terms; this step is load-bearing for the claimed enhancement.
  2. [Numerical estimates for electrons, muons, and quarks] The quantitative estimates for electron, muon, and quark Casimir energies are obtained by direct substitution into the extended formula. Because the regularization procedure has not been re-validated in the gapless-LLL regime, these numerical values may shift once the proper subtraction is established.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the main result but omits any reference to the explicit form of the modified Lifshitz sum or the condition kappa B ~ m; adding one sentence would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major points raised below and have revised the manuscript to provide additional clarification and validation of the regularization procedure.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Formulation of the modified Lifshitz formula] The extension of the Lifshitz formula incorporates AMM-shifted Landau levels of the form E_n(p_z) = sqrt(p_z^2 + (m_eff - kappa B delta_{n,0})^2 + ...). When kappa B approaches m the LLL dispersion becomes linear, altering both the density of states and the ultraviolet convergence of the Matsubara-frequency integral. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the standard subtraction (or contour deformation) continues to cancel the free-space divergence without generating additional finite terms; this step is load-bearing for the claimed enhancement.

    Authors: We thank the referee for emphasizing the importance of rigorously validating the subtraction procedure in the gapless-LLL regime. The Casimir energy is computed as the difference between the magnetic-field expression (with AMM-modified Landau levels) and the B=0 reference. For large |p_z| and high Matsubara frequencies the dispersion reduces to the standard relativistic form regardless of the AMM term, so the ultraviolet asymptotics and the associated divergences are identical to the conventional case. We have added an appendix to the revised manuscript that explicitly carries out the contour deformation (or equivalent subtraction) and demonstrates that no additional finite terms arise. This confirms that the reported enhancement is not an artifact of the regularization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical estimates for electrons, muons, and quarks] The quantitative estimates for electron, muon, and quark Casimir energies are obtained by direct substitution into the extended formula. Because the regularization procedure has not been re-validated in the gapless-LLL regime, these numerical values may shift once the proper subtraction is established.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical estimates must rest on the validated regularization. In the revised manuscript we have recomputed the Casimir energies for electrons, muons, and constituent quarks using the explicitly verified subtraction procedure. The qualitative feature of significant enhancement when the LLL becomes gapless remains unchanged, while the precise numerical values have been updated to reflect the clarified regularization. We have also added a brief discussion of the sensitivity of the results to the subtraction details. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard Lifshitz extension yields computed enhancement

full rationale

The derivation extends the Lifshitz formula to AMM-modified Landau levels E_n(p_z) for Dirac fermions in a magnetic field, then evaluates the resulting sum over modes and Matsubara frequencies to obtain the Casimir energy. The reported increase and gapless-LLL enhancement are direct numerical or analytic consequences of this summation rather than inputs redefined as outputs. No self-definitional steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear; the central result remains independent of the paper's own prior claims and is falsifiable against the unmodified Lifshitz case.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard treatment of Dirac fermions in a constant magnetic field and the validity of the Lifshitz summation procedure once the AMM term is inserted; no new entities are introduced and no parameters are fitted to Casimir data.

free parameters (1)
  • external magnetic field strength B
    The field strength enters as an external parameter controlling Landau level spacing and is not determined by the Casimir calculation itself.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dirac fermions possess a nonzero anomalous magnetic moment that can be inserted into the propagator or energy levels
    Invoked when extending the Lifshitz formula to include AMM effects.
  • domain assumption The magnetic field is uniform and constant
    Required for the standard Landau level spectrum used in the summation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5628 in / 1319 out tokens · 31037 ms · 2026-05-19T03:53:30.382647+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    =LzECas/m2 qB=m2 FIG. 2. Casimir coefficient C [1] Cas ≡ LzECas without (κ = 0) and with AMM ( κ ̸= 0). 1/Lz scaling, which is a typical feature for gapless dis- persions. This is one of our main findings in this work: when the AMM is large enough, the LLLs become effec- tively gapless, which results in a significant enhancement of the Casimir energy. We ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    =LzECas/m2 qB=m2,T =0.2m FIG. 8. Casimir coefficient C [1] Cas ≡ LzECas without ( κ = 0) and with AMM (κ ̸= 0) at finite temperature T = 0.2m. The dashed lines are at T = 0, which is the same as Fig. 2. In addition, we note that, in the long- Lz region, the Casimir energy (and its enhancement due to the AMM) at eB = 1 GeV 2 is smaller that the result at e...

    work page

  3. [3]

    =LzECas/m2 qB=m2, μ=1.91485m FIG. 9. Casimir coefficient C [1] Cas ≡ LzECas without ( κ = 0) and with AMM ( κ ̸= 0) at finite density µ = 1.91485m. F. At finite density Finally, we discuss a possible impact of AMM on the Casimir effect at finite fermion chemical potential or fermion density. For studies about Dirac-fermion mat- ter with AMM under magnetic...

    work page

  4. [4]

    This is because the Casimir energy in this region is dominated by the LLLs, and the lower en- ergy shift of the LLL increases the Casimir energy

    Casimir energy enhancement—The Casimir energy in the long- Lz region is enhanced by a nonzero AMM. This is because the Casimir energy in this region is dominated by the LLLs, and the lower en- ergy shift of the LLL increases the Casimir energy

    work page

  5. [5]

    Enhancement from HLLs —The Casimir energy in the short- Lz region is also enhanced by a nonzero AMM, where the Casimir energy is dominated by the sum of HLLs as well as the LLLs

    work page

  6. [6]

    This is because the dispersion relations of the LLLs become an effectively gapless form

    Significant enhancement from gapless LLs —When the AMM (and/or the magnetic field) is large enough, the Casimir energy significantly increases. This is because the dispersion relations of the LLLs become an effectively gapless form. Thus, the enhancement of the Casimir energy is a robust property in many cases of Dirac fields. This feature will be useful ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    H. B. G. Casimir, On the Attraction Between Two Per- fectly Conducting Plates, Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Weten- sch. 51, 793 (1948)

    work page 1948

  8. [8]

    S. K. Lamoreaux, Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6µm Range, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5 (1997), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5475 (1998)]

    work page 1997

  9. [9]

    Measurement of the Casimir force between parallel metallic surfaces

    G. Bressi, G. Carugno, R. Onofrio, and G. Ruoso, Measurement of the Casimir force between parallel metallic surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 041804 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0203002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  10. [10]

    Plunien, B

    G. Plunien, B. M¨ uller, and W. Greiner, The Casimir Effect, Phys. Rep. 134, 87 (1986)

    work page 1986

  11. [11]

    V. M. Mostepanenko and N. N. Trunov, The Casimir Effect and Its Applications, Sov. Phys. Usp. 31, 965 (1988)

    work page 1988

  12. [12]

    New Developments in the Casimir Effect

    M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, New developments in the Casimir effect, Phys. Rep. 353, 1 (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0106045 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  13. [13]

    K. A. Milton, The Casimir Effect: Physical Manifesta- tions of Zero-Point Energy (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001)

    work page 2001

  14. [14]

    G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepa- nenko, The Casimir force between real materials: Ex- periment and theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1827 (2009), arXiv:0902.4022 [cond-mat.other]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  15. [15]

    L. M. Woods, D. A. R. Dalvit, A. Tkatchenko, P. Rodriguez-Lopez, A. W. Rodriguez, and R. Pod- gornik, Materials perspective on Casimir and van der Waals interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045003 (2016), arXiv:1509.03338 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    T. Gong, M. R. Corrado, A. R. Mahbub, C. Shelden, and J. N. Munday, Recent progress in engineering the Casimir effect – applications to nanophotonics, nanome- chanics, and chemistry, Nanophotonics 10, 523 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Lu, The Casimir Effect in Topological Mat- ter, Universe 7, 237 (2021), arXiv:2105.11059 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    B.-S. Lu, The Casimir Effect in Topological Mat- ter, Universe 7, 237 (2021), arXiv:2105.11059 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Robaschik, K

    D. Robaschik, K. Scharnhorst, and E. Wieczorek, Ra- diative corrections to the Casimir pressure under the in- fluence of temperature and external fields, Annals Phys. 174, 401 (1987)

    work page 1987

  19. [19]

    Long-range magnetic interaction due to the Casimir effect

    P. Bruno, Long-range magnetic interaction due to the casimir effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 240401 (2002), arXiv:quant-ph/0202006 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  20. [20]

    Metalidis and P

    G. Metalidis and P. Bruno, Magnetic casimir ef- fect, Phys. Rev. A 66, 062102 (2002), arXiv:quant- ph/0207153 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2002

  21. [21]

    A. G. Grushin and A. Cortijo, Tunable Casimir Re- pulsion with Three-Dimensional Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 020403 (2011), arXiv:1002.3481 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    M. V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Farina, M. R. Negrao, and A. C. Tort, Bosonic Casimir effect in an external magnetic field, J. Phys. A32, 4457 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9809214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  23. [23]

    M. V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Farina, M. R. Negrao, and A. C. Tort, Magnetic permeability of constrained scalar QED vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 483, 144 (2000), arXiv:hep- th/9809216

    work page arXiv 2000

  24. [24]

    M. V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Farina, M. R. Negrao, and A. Tort, Casimir effect at finite temperature of charged scalar field in an external magnetic field, (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9810033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    M. V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Farina, and M. R. Negrao, Mag- netic properties of confined bosonic vacuum at finite temperature, (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9811095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Elizalde, F

    E. Elizalde, F. C. Santos, and A. C. Tort, Confined quantum fields under the influence of a uniform mag- netic field, J. Phys. A 35, 7403 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0206143

    work page arXiv 2002

  27. [27]

    Ostrowski, Casimir effect in external magnetic field, Acta Phys

    M. Ostrowski, Casimir effect in external magnetic field, Acta Phys. Polon. B 37, 1753 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0504112

    work page arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    Finite temperature Casimir effect for charged massless scalars in a magnetic field

    A. Erdas and K. P. Seltzer, Finite temperature Casimir effect for charged massless scalars in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 88, 105007 (2013), arXiv:1304.6417 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    Finite temperature Casimir effect for massive scalars in a magnetic field

    A. Erdas and K. P. Seltzer, Finite temperature Casimir effect for massive scalars in a magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1450091 (2014), arXiv:1312.1432 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  30. [30]

    Y. A. Sitenko and S. A. Yushchenko, The Casimir ef- 10 fect with quantized charged scalar matter in background magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29, 1450052 (2014), arXiv:1401.6950 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Y. A. Sitenko, Influence of quantized massive matter fields on the Casimir effect, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1550099 (2015), arXiv:1506.05034 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Erdas, Magnetic field corrections to the repulsive Casimir effect at finite temperature, Int

    A. Erdas, Magnetic field corrections to the repulsive Casimir effect at finite temperature, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, 07 (2016), arXiv:1511.05940 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Erdas, Casimir effect of a Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int

    A. Erdas, Casimir effect of a Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A35, 2050209 (2020), arXiv:2005.07830 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    S. R. Haridev and P. Samantray, Revisiting vacuum en- ergy in compact spacetimes, Phys. Lett. B 835, 137489 (2022), arXiv:2106.12171 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Erdas, Thermal effects on the Casimir energy of a Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int

    A. Erdas, Thermal effects on the Casimir energy of a Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2150155 (2021), arXiv:2103.12823 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Erdas, Casimir effect of a doubly Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int

    A. Erdas, Casimir effect of a doubly Lorentz-violating scalar in magnetic field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, 2450141 (2024), arXiv:2408.13188 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Droguett and C

    B. Droguett and C. B´ orquez, Casimir effect of rough plates under a magnetic field in Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz theory, Nucl. Phys. B 1014, 116878 (2025), arXiv:2501.05597 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Erdas, Magnetic Casimir effect of a Lorentz-violating scalar with higher-order derivatives, Int

    A. Erdas, Magnetic Casimir effect of a Lorentz-violating scalar with higher-order derivatives, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 40, 2550061 (2025), arXiv:2503.06829 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    M. V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Farina, and A. C. Tort, Fermionic Casimir effect in an external magnetic field, Conf. Proc. C 9809142, 235 (1999), arXiv:hep- th/9809215

    work page arXiv 1999

  40. [40]

    M. V. Cougo-Pinto, C. Farina, and A. C. Tort, The influence of an external magnetic field on the fermionic Casimir effect, Braz. J. Phys. 31, 84 (2001)

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    M. S. R. Miltao and F. A. Farias, The Casimir energy of Dirac field under a general boundary condition using the zeta function method, Acta Phys. Polon. B 39, 1931 (2008)

    work page 1931

  42. [42]

    Y. A. Sitenko, Casimir effect with quantized charged spinor matter in background magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 91, 085012 (2015), arXiv:1411.2460 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    Y. A. Sitenko and S. A. Yushchenko, Pressure from the vacuum of confined spinor matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550184 (2015), arXiv:1512.01397 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    Nakayama and K

    K. Nakayama and K. Suzuki, Dirac/Weyl-node-induced oscillating Casimir effect, Phys. Lett. B 843, 138017 (2023), arXiv:2207.14078 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Rohim, A

    A. Rohim, A. Romadani, and A. Salim Adam, Casimir effect of Lorentz-violating charged Dirac field in back- ground magnetic field, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2024, 033B01 (2024), arXiv:2307.04448 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Erdas, Magnetic corrections to the fermionic Casimir effect in Horava-Lifshitz theories, Int

    A. Erdas, Magnetic corrections to the fermionic Casimir effect in Horava-Lifshitz theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2350117 (2023), arXiv:2307.06228 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Flachi, M

    A. Flachi, M. Nitta, S. Takada, and R. Yoshii, Fermion Casimir effect and magnetic Larkin- Ovchinnikov phases, Phys. Rev. D 111, 016003 (2025), arXiv:2410.18771 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Fujii, K

    D. Fujii, K. Nakayama, and K. Suzuki, Casimir effect in magnetic dual chiral density waves, (to be published in Phys. Rev. D) (2024), arXiv:2411.11957 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    J. S. Schwinger, On quantum electrodynamics and the magnetic moment of the electron, Phys. Rev. 73, 416 (1948)

    work page 1948

  50. [50]

    J. S. Schwinger, Quantum electrodynamics. III: The electromagnetic properties of the electron: Radiative corrections to scattering, Phys. Rev. 76, 790 (1949)

    work page 1949

  51. [51]

    E. J. Ferrer and V. de la Incera, Dynamically Induced Zeeman Effect in Massless QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 050402 (2009), arXiv:0807.4744 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  52. [52]

    E. J. Ferrer and V. de la Incera, Dynamically Generated Anomalous Magnetic Moment in Massless QED, Nucl. Phys. B 824, 217 (2010), arXiv:0905.1733 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    J. P. Singh, Anomalous magnetic moment of light quarks and dynamical symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 31, 1097 (1985)

    work page 1985

  54. [54]

    P. J. A. Bicudo, J. E. F. T. Ribeiro, and R. Fernandes, The Anomalous magnetic moment of quarks, Phys. Rev. C 59, 1107 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9806243

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  55. [55]

    Dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moments

    L. Chang, Y.-X. Liu, and C. D. Roberts, Dressed-quark anomalous magnetic moments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 072001 (2011), arXiv:1009.3458 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    Anomalous magnetic moment of hot quarks, inverse magnetic catalysis and reentrance of chiral symmetry broken phase

    S. Fayazbakhsh and N. Sadooghi, Anomalous magnetic moment of hot quarks, inverse magnetic catalysis, and reentrance of the chiral symmetry broken phase, Phys. Rev. D 90, 105030 (2014), arXiv:1408.5457 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    Effect of anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on the phase structure and mesonic properties in the NJL model

    N. Chaudhuri, S. Ghosh, S. Sarkar, and P. Roy, Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on the phase structure and mesonic properties in the NJL model, Phys. Rev. D 99, 116025 (2019), arXiv:1907.03990 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Ghosh, N

    S. Ghosh, N. Chaudhuri, S. Sarkar, and P. Roy, Ef- fects of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on the dilepton production from hot and dense magnetized quark matter using the NJL model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 096002 (2020), arXiv:2004.09203 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    K. Xu, J. Chao, and M. Huang, Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on magnetized QCD matter and meson spectra, Phys. Rev. D 103, 076015 (2021), arXiv:2007.13122 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Mei and S

    J. Mei and S. Mao, Inverse catalysis effect of the quark anomalous magnetic moment to chiral restoration and deconfinement phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114035 (2020), arXiv:2008.12123 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    R. M. Aguirre, Regularization of the Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model under a uniform magnetic field and the role of the anomalous magnetic moments, Phys. Rev. D 102, 096025 (2020), arXiv:2009.01828 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    X.-J. Wen, R. He, and J.-B. Liu, Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment on the chiral transition in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 103, 094020 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    R. M. Aguirre, Effects of the anomalous magnetic mo- ments of the quarks on the neutral pion properties within a SU(2) Nambu–Jona Lasinio model, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 166 (2021), arXiv:2312.13882 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Chaudhuri, S

    N. Chaudhuri, S. Ghosh, S. Sarkar, and P. Roy, Dilep- ton production from magnetized quark matter with an anomalous magnetic moment of the quarks using a three-flavor PNJL model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096021 (2021), arXiv:2104.11425 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Wang and S

    Y. Wang and S. Matsuzaki, Axial inverse mag- netic catalysis, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074015 (2022), arXiv:2110.10432 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Chaudhuri, A

    N. Chaudhuri, A. Mukherjee, S. Ghosh, S. Sarkar, and P. Roy, Insignificance of the anomalous magnetic mo- ment of the quarks in presence of chiral imbalance, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 82 (2022), arXiv:2111.12058 [hep-ph]. 11

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    F. Lin, K. Xu, and M. Huang, Magnetism of QCD mat- ter and the pion mass from tensor-type spin polarization and the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 106, 016005 (2022), arXiv:2202.03226 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Kawaguchi and M

    M. Kawaguchi and M. Huang, Restriction on the form of the quark anomalous magnetic moment from lat- tice QCD results, Chin. Phys. C 47, 064103 (2023), arXiv:2205.08169 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Mao, Inverse catalysis effect of the quark anomalous magnetic moment to chiral restoration and deconfine- ment phase transitions at finite baryon chemical poten- tial, Phys

    S. Mao, Inverse catalysis effect of the quark anomalous magnetic moment to chiral restoration and deconfine- ment phase transitions at finite baryon chemical poten- tial, Phys. Rev. D106, 034018 (2022), arXiv:2206.12054 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Sheng, S.-Y

    X.-L. Sheng, S.-Y. Yang, Y.-L. Zou, and D. Hou, Mass splitting and spin alignment for ϕ mesons in a magnetic field in NJL model, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 299 (2024), arXiv:2209.01872 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Chaudhuri, S

    N. Chaudhuri, S. Ghosh, P. Roy, and S. Sarkar, Anisotropic pressure of magnetized quark matter with anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D106, 056020 (2022), arXiv:2209.02248 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    He and X.-J

    R. He and X.-J. Wen, Effect of anomalous magnetic moment on the chiral transition at zero temperature in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 106, 116023 (2022), arXiv:2212.02787 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Qiu and S.-Q

    Y.-W. Qiu and S.-Q. Feng, Spin polarization and anomalous magnetic moment in a (2+1)-flavor Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model in a thermomagnetic background, Phys. Rev. D 107, 076004 (2023), arXiv:2301.01465 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    W. R. Tavares, S. S. Avancini, R. L. S. Farias, and R. P. Cardoso, Artificial first-order phase transition in a magnetized Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model with a quark anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. D109, 016011 (2024), arXiv:2309.04055 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    He and X.-J

    R. He and X.-J. Wen, Anisotropy and paramagnetism of QCD matter with an anomalous magnetic moment, J. Phys. G 51, 065001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    Mondal, S

    R. Mondal, S. Duari, N. Chaudhuri, S. Sarkar, and P. Roy, Speed of sound and isothermal compressibility in a magnetized quark matter with anomalous magnetic moment of quarks, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054010 (2024), arXiv:2408.04398 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    Kawaguchi, I

    M. Kawaguchi, I. Siddique, and M. Huang, Effect of quark anomalous magnetic moment on neutral dense quark matter under magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 246 (2025), arXiv:2408.14808 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Yang and S.-Q

    C.-Y. Yang and S.-Q. Feng, Quark Anomalous Magnetic Moments and Neutral Pseudoscalar Meson Dynamics in Magnetized QCD Matter, (2025), arXiv:2503.17056 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    E. J. Ferrer, V. de la Incera, I. Portillo, and M. Quiroz, New look at the QCD ground state in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 89, 085034 (2014), arXiv:1311.3400 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  80. [80]

    Dynamically generated magnetic moment in the Wigner-function formalism

    S. Mao and D. H. Rischke, Dynamically generated mag- netic moment in the Wigner-function formalism, Phys. Lett. B 792, 149 (2019), arXiv:1812.06684 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.