Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 6 cited by

SPLENDOR: a novel detector platform to search for light dark matter with narrow-gap semiconductors

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a detector built on the 60 meV-gap semiconductor Eu5In2Sb6 with cryo-HEMT readout can directly probe sub-MeV dark matter, ultimately reaching the freeze-in relic-density target.

desk verdict A solid, honest detector R&D proposal for sub-MeV dark matter whose reach projections hinge on a 60 meV band gap that is not yet spectroscopically confirmed; treat the curves as a roadmap, not a result. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17782 v2 pith:IHMXQCPM submitted 2025-07-23 physics.ins-det astro-ph.COcond-mat.str-elhep-exhep-ph

P. Abbamonte , A. Albert , D. S. M. Alves , J. Anczarski , T. Aralis , T. U. Böhm , C. Boyd , J. Chen
show 26 more authors
P.-H. Chu M. S. Cook C. W. Fink M. L. Graesser Y. Kahn C. S. Kengle T. Kucinski N. A. Kurinsky C. Lane A. Leder R. Massarczyk A. Mazumdar S. J. Meijer W. Nie E. A. Peterson A. Phipps F. Ronning P. F. S. Rosa I. Rydstrom N. S. Sirica Z. J. Smith K. Stifter S. M. Thomas S. L. Watkins B. A. Young J.-X. Zhu
This is my paper
classification physics.ins-detastro-ph.COcond-mat.str-elhep-exhep-ph
keywords darkmatterdirectdetectionnarrow-gapsemiconductorsEu5In2Sb6cryogenicHEMTamplifiersub-MeVdailymodulationdielectriclossfunctionionizationdetector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a detector platform built around the narrow-gap, anisotropic semiconductor Eu5In2Sb6 with cryogenic HEMT charge readout can reach dark-matter energy deposits well below one electron-volt, a regime inaccessible to silicon and germanium. The load-bearing material property is a band gap near 60 meV, inferred from transport, Hall, and photoresponse data, which sets the energy needed to create an electron-hole pair. The paper reports a prototype readout chain with measured 20 ± 7 electron charge resolution in silicon test devices, and argues the platform is modular enough to swap in better targets and sub-electron quantum readout later. Its sensitivity projections claim that, with cCPT readout and low backgrounds, the platform can set first terrestrial limits below 0.5 MeV and ultimately reach the freeze-in relic-density line. The reason to care: if the 60 meV gap and the computed dielectric response hold at millikelvin temperatures, this is a concrete path to explore dark matter masses no current experiment reaches.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Zintl-phase semiconductor Eu5In2Sb6, chosen for a roughly 60 meV transport band gap (DFT gives about 20 meV indirect and 80 meV direct after a 40 meV scissor shift of the conduction bands), a strongly anisotropic orthorhombic structure, and low expected dark currents from valence-precise stoichiometry. The signal mechanism is dark-matter-induced excitation of electron-hole pairs, whose rate is controlled by the dielectric loss function $-\text{Im}[1/\epsilon(\omega,q)]$; the paper computes this from a Green's-function spectral representation of the electric susceptibility. The second half of the machinery is the charge readout: a two-stage cryoHEMT amplifier with a 10 mK buffer stage and 4 K gain stage integrated into the detector housing to minimize parasitic capacitance, with planned upgrades to active reset, parallel amplification, and cavity-embedded Cooper-pair transistors for sub-electron resolution.

What would settle it

A calibration run in the dilution refrigerator that illuminates the Eu5In2Sb6 prototype with a tunable near- and mid-infrared source at photon energies from 10 to 200 meV, counts ionization pulses with the calibrated amplifier, and extracts the charge yield per photon as a function of photon energy would settle the central claim: if the yield does not turn on near 60 meV and instead appears only above about 600 meV, the sensitivity projections collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central claim is that a detector using Eu5In2Sb6's roughly 60 meV transport gap and DFT-derived dielectric loss function can convert sub-MeV dark matter scattering and dark-photon absorption into countable ionization events, and that the crystal's orthorhombic anisotropy produces a 23–36% daily modulation of the rate usable to subtract static backgrounds. The projected 90% C.L. reach curves show that a 1 g-year exposure with single-electron sensitivity in a background-free idealized run already beats proposed phonon-readout schemes at low masses; in the more realistic staged scenarios, cryoHEMT readout at 5e−, 3e−, and 2e− reaches into the 0.01–0.5 MeV range only when combined with the modulation analysis, while 0.1e− cCPT readout is presented as the route to the freeze-in relic target.

Load-bearing premise

The projections assume the true band gap of Eu5In2Sb6 at 10 mK is about 60 meV and that the scissor-corrected DFT dielectric response accurately gives the low-energy loss function; the paper's own M-EELS data show an onset near 600 meV and the FTIR data cannot resolve the gap below 25 meV.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 60 meV gap is real at operating temperature, SPLENDOR's threshold is one to two orders of magnitude below existing semiconductor detectors, opening the 0.01–0.5 MeV mass window to direct detection.
  • The predicted 23–36% daily modulation converts the detector into a background-subtracting instrument: static dark counts and Compton events can be removed by day/night binning without knowing their detailed shape.
  • The measured 20 ± 7 electron resolution in silicon, with predicted 2–5 electron cryoHEMT versions and 0.1 electron cCPT versions, defines a staged path from first science runs to the freeze-in relic-density target.
  • The same dielectric tensor gives competitive sensitivity to dark-photon absorption in the sub-eV to tens-of-eV mass range, extending the platform beyond scattering-based searches.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reach depends sharply on the true low-temperature gap: if the M-EELS onset near 600 meV reflects the actual gap rather than a surface artifact, the signal rate would fall by orders of magnitude, so a direct sub-gap calibration is the decisive near-term test.
  • The same platform logic—anisotropic narrow-gap crystal plus low-noise charge readout—should transfer to other Zintl and f-electron compounds, meaning the detector's science reach is tied to materials discovery as much as to sensor development.
  • The daily-modulation analysis assumes backgrounds are time-independent at sidereal periods; muon and cosmogenic activation backgrounds with diurnal or solar correlations could mimic or dilute the signal, so the modulation phase and amplitude should be fitted against measured time-dependent background data.
  • A testable extension is to measure the charge yield per photon at several wavelengths straddling 60–600 meV, mapping the ionization yield model and Fano factor directly rather than relying on the heuristic one-third-energy-to-ionization assumption used in the projections.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper presents the design, prototype status, and sensitivity projections of SPLENDOR, a modular detector platform for sub-MeV dark matter using narrow-gap semiconductor targets and low-noise cryogenic charge readout. The manuscript reports the synthesis and characterization of Eu5In2Sb6 single crystals, including transport, Hall, photoresponse, M-EELS, FTIR, and radioassay measurements; the calibration of a two-stage cryoHEMT amplifier on a Si test sample with a measured charge resolution of 20 +/- 7 electrons; first-principles DFT calculations of the dielectric response; and projected sensitivities to dark photon absorption and freeze-in dark matter-electron scattering under several background and readout upgrade scenarios. The central claim is that this platform can reach unexplored sub-MeV dark matter parameter space and eventually the freeze-in relic-density target, enabled by a 60 meV gap and anisotropic response of Eu5In2Sb6.

Significance. If the material assumptions hold, SPLENDOR would offer a distinctive combination of sub-eV electronic thresholds and directional sensitivity through daily modulation, with a modular architecture that can incorporate different target crystals and readout technologies. The paper documents genuine technical progress: optimized growth of high-quality crystals, a working two-stage cryoHEMT readout chain with open-source DAQ, a detailed anisotropic rate formalism with explicit predictions for the modulation amplitude, and a staged upgrade path from surface to deep-underground operation. These are concrete, useful contributions to the sub-GeV dark matter detector portfolio. The physics significance of the sensitivity projections, however, is conditional on the assumed 60 meV band gap and the accuracy of the computed low-energy loss function, neither of which is established by the currently presented measurements.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II / Appx. A.2 / Fig. 3] The assumed 60 meV band gap is inferred from transport above 20 K, and Appx. A.2 explicitly assumes that the sub-K antiferromagnetic gap equals the paramagnetic-phase value. The only M-EELS data (Appx. A.5, Fig. 18) show an onset near 600 meV that is attributed to the rough cleave but not independently ruled out, and the FTIR data (Appx. A.6, Fig. 19) cannot separate a low-energy electronic gap from phonon peaks below ~25 meV and the tail of the 600 meV interband onset. Because the dark matter scattering and absorption rates in Appx. C are proportional to the loss function, a true gap of a few hundred meV or a factor-of-several error in the low-energy Im[-1/epsilon] would shift the projected reach in Figs. 9, 10, and 13 by orders of magnitude. The paper should either provide direct low-energy spectroscopic confirmation of the gap and loss function, or explicitly label the projections as conditional on this unverified assumption and quantify the effect of alternative gap values.
  2. [Appx. B.1 / Appx. B.2, Eq. (B1), Fig. 24] The DFT-based dielectric response used for the rate predictions is not an independent input: a 40 meV scissor shift is applied to match the transport gap, so the calculated response is anchored to the same 60 meV value that is under question. Additionally, Appx. B.2 and Fig. 24 report an unexplained discrepancy between the DFT and FTIR-derived Im epsilon in the 20-400 meV range, with the text stating that it is not clear whether the temperature-dependent suppression can fully account for the difference. Since the rate calculations in Sec. IV use the scissor-corrected response, the central physics input to the projected reach is unvalidated in exactly the energy range of interest. A quantitative study of how the reach in Figs. 9 and 13 changes under the DFT/FTIR discrepancy, or an independent validation of the low-energy loss function, is needed before the projected sensitivities can be regarded as robust.
  3. [Sec. III / Table I] The measured charge resolution is 20 +/- 7 electrons (Sec. III, Fig. 6), not the 5 electrons assumed for scenario 1 in Table I. The paper attributes the factor-of-four difference to non-ideal charge collection in the silicon test sample, but this has not been demonstrated on Eu5In2Sb6 or at the target operating temperature. The baseline sensitivity projections should either use the demonstrated resolution or provide a concrete calibration path showing that 5 electrons is achievable in the deployed configuration. The abstract's statement that the measured resolution is 'consistent with predicted performance' also understates the discrepancy and should be reworded.
  4. [Sec. IV C / p_ne(omega)] The conversion from deposited energy to electron count relies on the heuristic p_ne(omega) with average yield <n_eh> = (1/3) omega/Egap and a Fano factor F = 0.15 adopted from silicon-like behavior. This conversion directly determines the ne distributions used in the binned log-likelihood analysis and hence the reach estimates in Fig. 13. For a strongly correlated, narrow-gap f-electron material, neither the 1/3 ionization fraction nor the Fano factor is validated. The authors should state the sensitivity of the projected reach to these parameters and, if possible, calibrate the yield model with the Eu5In2Sb6 prototype rather than assuming silicon-like values.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Appx. B.2] In the discussion of the intermediate frequency range, the text writes 'omega ~ (20-400) eV', but the surrounding discussion and Fig. 24 clearly concern meV energies; this should be corrected to meV.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (1)] The symbols NV, epsilon_CCE, and tau_BW in Eq. (1) are not defined in the main text; a sentence defining them (or pointing to Ref. [37]) would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Table I / Fig. 13] The table header 'single-e- dark rate' and the repeated use of 'e-' in quoted units are awkward; clarifying that the dark rate is per electron-equivalent charge bin would make the background model easier to follow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sensitivity projections are conditional model estimates built on measured and flagged material parameters, not reductions of inputs to outputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is linear and externally anchored: transport and photoresponse measurements motivate Egap ≈ 60 meV (Sec. II, Appx. A.2–A.4); a DFT calculation with an explicit 40 meV scissor shift is calibrated to that transport gap (Appx. B.1); the resulting dielectric loss function and susceptibility feed standard DM-electron scattering/absorption formulas (Sec. IV, Appx. C). No step fits a quantity to DM data and then re-predicts that same quantity: the DM rates and reach curves are downstream consequences of a material model, and the paper repeatedly labels them as idealized or scenario-dependent projections (e.g., "While these sensitivity projections are unrealistic..."). The key vulnerabilities are stated in the text rather than hidden: Appx. A.2 says "we work under the assumption that the bandgap ... in the sub-K antiferromagnetic phase is not significantly different from its counterpart in the paramagnetic phase above 14 K"; Appx. A.5 reports M-EELS would suggest a gap "closer to 600 meV" and attributes this to surface roughness; Appx. A.6 states phonon peaks below 25 meV precluded a direct gap determination; and Appx. B.2 (Fig. 24) admits it is "not clear whether this suppression can fully account for the discrepancy in intensity between theory and experiment" in the 20–400 meV range. These are correctness risks, not circularity. Self-citations to prior collaboration work ([37], [40], [73], [141]) supply methods, synthesis, and software, but none is a uniqueness theorem or an unverified premise that forces the reach; the amplifier resolution is measured in this paper, and the DFT response is compared to FTIR data here. The heuristic ionization yield p_ne(ω) with F = 0.15 is explicitly a simplified model borrowed from silicon, again an assumption rather than a circular step. Accordingly, no load-bearing argument reduces to its own input, and the appropriate circularity finding is none.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or fundamental entities. It uses existing dark matter models (dark photon, freeze-in) and a newly synthesized material. The main free parameters are the scissor shift, Fano factor, and ionization yield fraction, all of which are tuned or assumed rather than independently measured for the target material.

free parameters (3)
  • Scissor shift Delta = 40 meV
    Applied to the DFT band structure to match the measured transport gap of 60 meV. This is a free parameter that directly affects the computed dielectric response and hence the dark matter rate predictions.
  • Fano factor F = 0.15
    Adopted from silicon, not measured for Eu5In2Sb6. Used in the ionization yield model to convert energy deposits into electron counts.
  • Ionization yield factor (1/3) = 1/3
    Heuristic assumption that one third of deposited energy goes into ionization rather than phonons. Used to set the average electron-hole pair yield.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT-PBE with a scissor correction provides a reliable low-energy dielectric response for Eu5In2Sb6.
    The paper applies a 40 meV scissor shift to DFT eigenvalues to match the measured gap, then uses the resulting response functions to compute dark matter rates. The reliability of this procedure is assumed, and the paper notes unresolved discrepancies with optical conductivity in the 20-400 meV range.
  • ad hoc to paper The band gap of Eu5In2Sb6 is approximately 60 meV and remains similar at mK temperatures in the antiferromagnetic phase.
    The paper adopts 60 meV from transport measurements above 20 K and argues the gap is insensitive to magnetic ordering. The M-EELS data suggest a much larger gap, which would invalidate the sensitivity projections.
  • domain assumption The standard halo model with v0=220 km/s and vesc=550 km/s describes the local dark matter velocity distribution.
    Used in the dark matter scattering rate formula. This is a standard assumption in direct detection, but deviations would affect the computed rates and modulation amplitudes.
  • domain assumption Backgrounds (dark current, Compton scattering, amplifier noise) do not modulate on a sidereal day, allowing the daily modulation analysis to subtract them.
    The background subtraction strategy relies on the temporal constancy of backgrounds. The paper discusses known exceptions such as muon modulation, but assumes these are negligible or out of phase.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SPLENDOR: a novel detector platform to search for light dark matter with narrow-gap semiconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IHMXQCPM

@misc{pith2026250717782,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SPLENDOR: a novel detector platform to search for light dark matter with narrow-gap semiconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IHMXQCPM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17782}
}
abstract

We present the design and current status of SPLENDOR, a novel detector platform that combines narrow-gap semiconductor targets with low-noise charge readout to achieve sensitivity to dark matter energy deposits well below the eV scale. SPLENDOR is designed to be a modular and scalable system able to accommodate different target materials and signal readout technologies. SPLENDOR's present strategy entails: (i) the use of strongly correlated f-electron semiconductors with anisotropic electronic structures to enable not only sub-eV energy thresholds, but also directional sensitivity to the incoming dark matter flux, allowing for signal-background discrimination via daily modulation, and (ii) custom charge readout based on cryogenic high-electron-mobility transistor (cryoHEMT) amplifiers approaching single-electron resolution. We report on the selection and characterization of Eu$_5$In$_2$Sb$_6$ as the target material for SPLENDOR's first prototype detector, as well as the development and calibration of the prototype amplifier chain, achieving a measured charge resolution of 20$\pm$7 electrons in silicon test samples, consistent with predicted performance. This provides a demonstration of the detector architecture, which is now ready for deployment in a dark matter search campaign to deliver SPLENDOR's first science results. Finally, we present estimates of sensitivity reach in the parameter space of athermally produced relic dark matter under high- and low-background environments, and for various amplifier technology upgrades with increasing performance, including planned quantum sensing upgrades in order to achieve our ultimate goal of sub-electron resolution in optimized systems. SPLENDOR provides a novel approach to dark matter direct detection, combining quantum sensing with material's design to open new avenues of exploration in the sub-MeV mass range of dark matter parameter space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17782 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Lower bound on the range of dark matter masses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The orthorhombic crystal structure of Eu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The measured charge yield per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (21 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Schematic diagram of the simplified amplifier topol [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Example of a pulse from a charge signal in a silicon chip as measured by our current cryoHEMT-based charge amplifier. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Red curve: the 90% C.L. sensitivity reach of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Differential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The 90% C.L. sensitivity reach estimates for SPLENDOR detector upgrades under different scenarios summa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Temperature dependence of the carrier mobility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Temperature dependence of the carrier concen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Femtoscribed Eu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Zero-loss EELS momentum scan of Eu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_17.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Optical conductivity spectrum of Eu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. The radioassay spectrum of the antimony sam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. Simulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. Electronic band structure for bulk Eu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. The frequency dependence of the real (dashed) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. Comparison between our DFT prediction for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. The real (dashed) and imaginary (solid) parts of the electric susceptibility of bulk Eu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26. The kinematically allowed phase space for dark mat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: that the directional dependence of the signal rate varies as a function of dark matter mass, and, therefore, so will the optimal crystal orientation. Combined with our chosen convention for the target orientation in (C7), the curves in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ubiquitous Corotation of Dark Matter Halos: Implications for Direct Detection

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dark matter in simulated Milky Way analogues preferentially corotates with the baryonic disk, suppressing predicted direct-detection rates for light WIMPs, reducing directional modulation, and producing a 21% astrophy...

  2. Dark Matter Weather: Probing Sub-GeV Interactions with Earth-Shielding Modulation

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Daily Earth-shielding modulation of sub-GeV dark matter can separate dark-matter–electron from dark-matter–nucleon scattering, and the isoangle shape statistic provides a new validation handle for liquid-noble detectors.

  3. Direct Detection of Leptophobic Dark Matter with Electronic Collective Excitations

    hep-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Leptophobic dark matter can excite plasmons in silicon through hadronic loops, and SENSEI data now constrain its nucleon cross section down to ~1e-31 cm^2 in the sub-MeV mass range.

  4. Electronic Direct Detection of Light Dark Matter with Intermediate-Mass Mediators

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    For sub-GeV dark matter, the light and heavy mediator mass limits in direct detection are separated by up to three orders of magnitude in mediator mass, enabling precise sensitivity calculations for Si, Ge, and DAMIC-...

  5. Dive deeper with SUBMARINE: SUB-Mev dArk matter diRect detectIon using bilayer grapheNE

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Bilayer graphene enables sub-MeV dark matter detection via electronic excitations with small exposure and sidereal modulation signatures.

  6. Engineering a Correlated Narrow-Gap Semiconductor: Effects of Ga Substitution in EuZn$_2$P$_2$

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Gallium substitution in EuZn2P2 lowers resistivity by roughly two orders of magnitude, reduces the activation gap to about 63 meV, and preserves a ~90% negative magnetoresistance at 45 K.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    S.Navas et al.(ParticleDataGroup),ReviewofParticle Physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Battaglieri, A

    M. Battaglieri, A. Belloni, A. Chou, P. Cushman, B. Echenard, et al., US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report (2017), arXiv:1707.04591 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Angloher et al

    G. Angloher et al. (CRESST), Results on MeV-scale dark matter from a gram-scale cryogenic calorimeter op- erated above ground, Eur. Phys. J. C77, 637 (2017), arXiv:1707.06749 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    A. H. Abdelhameedet al.(CRESST), First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019), arXiv:1904.00498 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Alkhatib et al

    I. Alkhatib et al. (SuperCDMS), Light Dark Matter Search with a High-Resolution Athermal Phonon De- tector Operated Above Ground, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 061801 (2021), arXiv:2007.14289 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Renet al., Design and characterization of a phonon- mediated cryogenic particle detector with an eV-scale threshold and 100 keV-scale dynamic range, Phys

    R. Renet al., Design and characterization of a phonon- mediated cryogenic particle detector with an eV-scale threshold and 100 keV-scale dynamic range, Phys. Rev. D 104, 032010 (2021), arXiv:2012.12430 [physics.ins- det]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    C. W. Fink et al. (CPD), Performance of a large area photon detector for rare event search applications, Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 022601 (2021), arXiv:2009.14302 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    D. W. Amaral et al. (SuperCDMS), Constraints on low-mass, relic dark matter candidates from a surface- operated SuperCDMS single-charge sensitive detector, Phys. Rev. D 102, 091101 (2020), arXiv:2005.14067 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

Show all 161 references
  1. [9]

    Barak et al

    L. Barak et al. (SENSEI), SENSEI: Direct-Detection Results on sub-GeV Dark Matter from a New Skipper-CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 171802 (2020), arXiv:2004.11378 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Arnquistet al

    I. Arnquistet al. (DAMIC-M), First Constraints from DAMIC-M on Sub-GeV Dark-Matter Particles Interact- ing with Electrons, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 171003 (2023), arXiv:2302.02372 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Aguilar-Arevaloet al.(Oscura), The Oscura Exper- iment (2022), arXiv:2202.10518 [astro-ph.IM]

    A. Aguilar-Arevaloet al.(Oscura), The Oscura Exper- iment (2022), arXiv:2202.10518 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    C. L. Chang et al. (TESSERACT), First Limits on Light Dark Matter Interactions in a Low Threshold Two Channel Athermal Phonon Detector from the TESSER- ACT Collaboration (2025), arXiv:2503.03683 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    S. A. Hertel, A. Biekert, J. Lin, V. Velan, and D. N. McKinsey, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter us- ing a superfluid 4He target, Phys. Rev. D100, 092007 (2019), arXiv:1810.06283 [physics.ins-det]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Anthony-Petersenet al.(SPICE/HeRALD), Demon- stration of the HeRALD superfluid helium detec- tor concept, Phys

    R. Anthony-Petersenet al.(SPICE/HeRALD), Demon- stration of the HeRALD superfluid helium detec- tor concept, Phys. Rev. D 110, 072006 (2024), arXiv:2307.11877 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Knapen, T

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, M. Pyle, and K. M. Zurek, De- tection of Light Dark Matter With Optical Phonons in Polar Materials, Phys. Lett. B 785, 386 (2018), arXiv:1712.06598 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Griffin, S

    S. Griffin, S. Knapen, T. Lin, and K. M. Zurek, Direc- tional Detection of Light Dark Matter with Polar Mate- rials, Phys. Rev. D98, 115034 (2018), arXiv:1807.10291 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    S. M. Griffin, Y. Hochberg, K. Inzani, N. Kurinsky, T. Lin, and T. Chin, Silicon carbide detectors for sub- GeV dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 103, 075002 (2021), arXiv:2008.08560 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    N. A. Kurinsky, T. C. Yu, Y. Hochberg, and B. Cabr- era, Diamond Detectors for Direct Detection of Sub- GeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 99, 123005 (2019), arXiv:1901.07569 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M. C. Marshall, M. J. Turner, M. J. H. Ku, D. F. Phillips, and R. L. Walsworth, Directional detection of dark matter with diamond, Quantum Sci. Technol.6, 024011 (2021), arXiv:2009.01028 [physics.ins-det]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Hochberg, Y

    Y. Hochberg, Y. Kahn, M. Lisanti, K. M. Zurek, A. G. Grushin, R. Ilan, S. M. Griffin, Z.-F. Liu, S. F. Weber, and J. B. Neaton, Detection of sub-MeV Dark Matter with Three-Dimensional Dirac Materials, Phys. Rev. D 15 97, 015004 (2018), arXiv:1708.08929 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R. M. Geilhufe, F. Kahlhoefer, and M. W. Winkler, Dirac Materials for Sub-MeV Dark Matter Detection: New Targets and Improved Formalism, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055005 (2020), arXiv:1910.02091 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hochberg, Y

    Y. Hochberg, Y. Zhao, and K. M. Zurek, Superconduct- ing Detectors for Superlight Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 011301 (2016), arXiv:1504.07237 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Kim, S.-J

    Y.-H. Kim, S.-J. Lee, and B. Yang, Superconducting detectors for rare event searches in experimental as- troparticle physics, Supercond. Sci. Technol.35, 063001 (2022), arXiv:2111.08875 [physics.ins-det]

    2022

  16. [24]

    A. Das, N. Kurinsky, and R. K. Leane, Dark Matter Induced Power in Quantum Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 121801 (2024), arXiv:2210.09313 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hochberg, I

    Y. Hochberg, I. Charaev, S.-W. Nam, V. Verma, M. Colangelo, and K. K. Berggren, Detecting Sub-GeV Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 151802 (2019), arXiv:1903.05101 [hep- ph]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Chileset al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an OpticalHaloscope,Phys.Rev.Lett

    J. Chileset al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an OpticalHaloscope,Phys.Rev.Lett. 128,231802(2022), arXiv:2110.01582 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. D. Shaw, J. Bueno, P. Day, C. M. Bradford, and P. M. Echternach, Quantum capacitance detector: A pair-breaking radiation detector based on the single Cooper-pair box, Phys. Rev. B 79, 144511 (2009), arXiv:0902.4194 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2009 arXiv

  20. [28]

    P. M. Echternach, B. J. Pepper, T. Reck, and C. M. Bradford, Single photon detection of 1.5 THz radiation with the quantum capacitance detector, Nat. Astron.2, 90 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    C. W. Fink, C. P. Salemi, B. A. Young, D. I. Schuster, and N. A. Kurinsky, The Superconducting Quasiparticle-Amplifying Transmon: A Qubit-Based Sensor for meV Scale Phonons and Single THz Photons, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 054009 (2024), arXiv:2310.01345 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Hochberg, M

    Y. Hochberg, M. Pyle, Y. Zhao, and K. M. Zurek, De- tecting Superlight Dark Matter with Fermi-Degenerate Materials, J. High Energy Phys. 08, 057 (2016), arXiv:1512.04533 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Trickle, Z

    T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, and K. M. Zurek, Detecting Light Dark Matter with Magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 201801 (2020), arXiv:1905.13744 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Coskuner, A

    A. Coskuner, A. Mitridate, A. Olivares, and K. M. Zurek, Directional Dark Matter Detection in Anisotropic Dirac Materials, Phys. Rev. D 103, 016006 (2021), arXiv:1909.09170 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    C. Boyd, Y. Hochberg, Y. Kahn, E. D. Kramer, N. Kurinsky, B. V. Lehmann, and T. C. Yu, Direc- tional detection of dark matter with anisotropic re- sponse functions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 015015 (2023), arXiv:2212.04505 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    D. N. Spergel, Motion of the Earth and the detection of weakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. D37, 1353 (1988)

    1988

  27. [35]

    Gondolo, Recoil momentum spectrum in directional dark matter detectors, Phys

    P. Gondolo, Recoil momentum spectrum in directional dark matter detectors, Phys. Rev. D66, 103513 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0209110

    2002 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ahlen et al., The case for a directional dark mat- ter detector and the status of current experimental ef- forts,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 25,1(2010),arXiv:0911.0323 [astro-ph.CO]

    S. Ahlen et al., The case for a directional dark mat- ter detector and the status of current experimental ef- forts,Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 25,1(2010),arXiv:0911.0323 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Anczarski et al., Two-Stage Cryogenic HEMT- Based Amplifier for Low-Temperature Detectors, J

    J. Anczarski et al., Two-Stage Cryogenic HEMT- Based Amplifier for Low-Temperature Detectors, J. Low Temp. Phys. 214, 256 (2024), arXiv:2311.02229 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Phipps, A

    A. Phipps, A. Juillard, B. Sadoulet, B. Serfass, and Y. Jin, A HEMT-Based Cryogenic Charge Amplifier with sub-100 eVee Ionization Resolution for Massive Semiconductor Dark Matter Detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A940, 181 (2019), arXiv:1611.09712 [physics.ins- det]

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Augier et al

    C. Augier et al. (Ricochet), First demonstration of 30 eVee ionization energy resolution with Ricochet germa- nium cryogenic bolometers, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 186 (2024), arXiv:2306.00166 [astro-ph.IM]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    P. Rosa, Y. Xu, M. Rahn, J. Souza, S. Kushwaha, L. Veiga, A. Bombardi, S. Thomas, M. Janoschek, E. Bauer, et al., Colossal magnetoresistance in a non- symmorphic antiferromagnetic insulator, npj Quantum Mater. 5, 52 (2020), arXiv:2007.06556 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gopalakrishna, A

    S. Gopalakrishna, A. de Gouvea, and W. Porod, Right-handed sneutrinos as nonthermal dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.05 (2006), 005, arXiv:hep- ph/0602027

    2006

  34. [42]

    L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West, Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03, 080 (2010), arXiv:0911.1120 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bernal, M

    N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen, and V. Vaskonen, The Dawn of FIMP Dark Matter: A Review of Models and Constraints, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1730023 (2017), arXiv:1706.07442 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Dvorkin, T

    C. Dvorkin, T. Lin, and K. Schutz, Making dark matter out of light: freeze-in from plasma effects, Phys. Rev. D 99, 115009 (2019), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 105, 119901 (2022)], arXiv:1902.08623 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Rogalski and J

    A. Rogalski and J. Piotrowski, Intrinsic infrared detec- tors, Prog. Quantum Electron.12, 87 (1988)

    1988

  38. [47]

    J. E. L. Hollis, S. C. Choo, and E. L. Heasell, Recombi- nation Centers in InSb, J. Appl. Phys.38, 1626 (1967)

    1967

  39. [48]

    Chu and A

    J. Chu and A. Sher, Impurities and Defects, inDevice Physics of Narrow Gap Semiconductors(Springer New York, New York, NY, 2010) pp. 5–124

    2010

  40. [49]

    Abautret, J

    J. Abautret, J. P. Perez, A. Evirgen, J. Rothman, A.Cordat,andP.Christol,Characterizationofmidwave infrared InSb avalanche photodiode, J. Appl. Phys.117, 244502 (2015)

    2015

  41. [50]

    B. Xu, L. X. Zhao, P. Marsik, E. Sheveleva, F. Lyzwa, Y. M. Dai, G. F. Chen, X. G. Qiu, and C. Bernhard, Temperature-Driven Topological Phase Transition and Intermediate Dirac Semimetal Phase in ZrTe5, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 187401 (2018), arXiv:1811.00772 [cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Lawson, S

    W. Lawson, S. Nielsen, E. Putley, and A. Young, Prepa- ration and properties of HgTe and mixed crystals of HgTe-CdTe, J. Phys. Chem. Solids9, 325 (1959)

    1959

  43. [52]

    Rogalski, HgCdTe infrared detector material: his- tory, status and outlook, Rep

    A. Rogalski, HgCdTe infrared detector material: his- tory, status and outlook, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 2267 (2005)

    2005

  44. [53]

    Nemirovsky, D

    Y. Nemirovsky, D. Rosenfeld, R. Adar, and A. Kornfeld, Tunneling and dark currents in HgCdTe photodiodes, J. 16 Vac. Sci. Technol. A7, 528 (1989)

    1989

  45. [54]

    S. M. Kauzlarich, Zintl Phases: From Curiosities to Im- pactful Materials, Chem. Mater.35, 7355 (2023)

    2023

  46. [55]

    Varnava, T

    N. Varnava, T. Berry, T. M. McQueen, and D. Van- derbilt, Engineering magnetic topological insulators Eu5M2X6 in Zintl compounds, Phys. Rev. B 105, 235128 (2022), arXiv:2203.06212 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [56]

    M. M. Piva, M. C. Rahn, S. M. Thomas, B. L. Scott, P. G. Pagliuso, J. D. Thompson, L. M. Schoop, F. Ronning, and P. F. S. Rosa, Robust Narrow-Gap Semiconducting Behavior in Square-Net La 3Cd2As6, Chem. Mater.33, 4122 (2021), arXiv:2108.08006 [cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [57]

    C. S. Kengle, N. Schnitzer, E. A. Peterson, C. Guo, L. Zhang, M. S. Cook, J.-X. Zhu, S. M. Thomas, P. J. W. Moll, F. Ronning,et al., Putative excitonic in- sulating state in narrow-gap semiconductor La3Cd2As6 (2025), arXiv:2506.09235 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  49. [58]

    M. M. Piva, L. Xiang, J. D. Thompson, S. L. Bud’ko, R. A. Ribeiro, P. C. Canfield, and P. F. S. Rosa, Ef- fects of external pressure on the narrow-gap semicon- ductor Ce3Cd2As6, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094443 (2022), arXiv:2203.10049 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [59]

    M. S. Cook, E. A. Peterson, C. Girod, A. Weiland, J.- X. Zhu, J. D. Thompson, S. M. Thomas, and P. F. S. Rosa, Structural transition and anisotropic magnetism in disorderedZintlphase Eu7Ga6Sb8, Phys. Rev.Mater. 7, 094601 (2023)

    2023

  51. [60]

    Berry, V

    T. Berry, V. J. Stewart, B. W. Y. Redemann, C. Ly- gouras, N. Varnava, D. Vanderbilt, and T. M. McQueen, A-type antiferromagnetic order in the Zintl-phase in- sulator EuZn2P2, Phys. Rev. B 106, 054420 (2022), arXiv:2203.12739 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Krebber, M

    S. Krebber, M. Kopp, C. Garg, K. Kummer, J. Sichelschmidt, S. Schulz, G. Poelchen, M. Mende, A. V. Virovets, K. Warawa, M. D. Thomson, A. V. Tarasov, D. Y. Usachov, D. V. Vyalikh, H. G. Roskos, J. Müller, C. Krellner, and K. Kliemt, Colossal mag- netoresistance in EuZn2P2 and ...

    2023 arXiv

  53. [62]

    M. S. Cook, E. A. Peterson, C. S. Kengle, E. R. Kennedy, J. Sheeran, C. Girod, G. S. Freitas, S. M. Greer, P. Abbamonte, P. G. Pagliuso, J. D. Thompson, S. M. Thomas, and P. F. S. Rosa, Magnetic polaron formation in EuZn2P2 (2025), arXiv:2504.05494 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Wang, S.-Q

    J. Wang, S.-Q. Xia, X.-T. Tao, M. C. Schäfer, and S. Bobev, New ternary phosphides and arsenides. Syntheses, crystal structures, physical properties of Eu2ZnP2, Eu 2Zn2P3 and Eu2Cd2As3, J. Solid State Chem. 205, 116 (2013)

    2013

  55. [64]

    P. F. S. Rosa and Z. Fisk, Flux methods for growth of intermetallic single crystals, inCrystal Growth of Inter- metallics, edited by P. Gille and Y. Grin (De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2019) pp. 49–60

    2019

  56. [65]

    A. L. Efros and B. I. Shklovskii, Coulomb gap and low temperature conductivity of disordered systems, Jour- nal of Physics C: Solid State Physics8, L49 (1975)

    1975

  57. [66]

    Huang, Y

    Y. Huang, Y. He, B. Skinner, and B. I. Shklovskii, Con- ductivity of two-dimensional narrow gap semiconduc- tors subjected to strong Coulomb disorder, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054206 (2022)

    2022

  58. [67]

    B. I. Shklovskii, Half-century of Efros–Shklovskii Coulomb gap: Romance with Coulomb interac- tion and disorder, Low Temperature Physics 50, 1101 (2024), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/ltp/article- pdf/50/12/1101/20288715/1101_1_10.0034343.pdf

    2024

  59. [68]

    B. I. Shklovskii and A. L. Efros,Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors, 1st ed., Springer Series in Solid- State Sciences (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  60. [69]

    M. V. A. Crivillero, S. Rößler, P. F. S. Rosa, J. Müller, U.K.Rößler,andS.Wirth,Surfaceandelectronicstruc- ture at atomic length scales of the nonsymmorphic an- tiferromagnet Eu5In2Sb6, Phys. Rev. B 106, 035124 (2022), arXiv:2204.07001 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Juillard, J

    A. Juillard, J. Billard, D. Chaize, J.-B. Filippini, D. Misiak, L. Vagneron, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, Y. Jin, C. Ulysse,et al., Low-noise HEMTs for Coherent Elastic Neutrino Scattering and Low-Mass Dark Matter Cryo- genic Semiconductor Detectors, J. Low Temp. Phys. 199, 798 (2019)...

    2019 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Gatti and P

    E. Gatti and P. F. Manfredi, Processing the Signals From Solid State Detectors in Elementary Particle Physics, Riv. Nuovo Cim.9N1, 1 (1986)

    1986

  63. [72]

    S. R. Golwala,Exclusion limits on the WIMP nucleon elastic scattering cross-section from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2000)

    2000

  64. [73]

    S. L. Watkins, SPLENDAQ: A Detector-Agnostic Data Acquisition System for Small-Scale Physics Ex- periments, J. Low Temp. Phys. 214, 133 (2024), arXiv:2310.01279 [physics.ins-det]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Liquid Instruments, Moku Hardware Platforms (2025), https://www.liquidinstruments.com/

    2025

  66. [75]

    Brock, J

    B. Brock, J. Li, S. Kanhirathingal, B. Thyagarajan, W. F. Braasch, M. Blencowe, and A. Rimberg, Non- linear Charge- and Flux-Tunable Cavity Derived From an Embedded Cooper-Pair Transistor, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 044009 (2021), arXiv:2011.06298 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Y.KahnandT.Lin,Searchesforlightdarkmatterusing condensed matter systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.85, 066901 (2022), arXiv:2108.03239 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Knapen, J

    S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, Dark matter- electron scattering in dielectrics, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015031 (2021), arXiv:2101.08275 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [78]

    P. N. Bhattiprolu, R. McGehee, E. Petrosky, and A. Pierce, Sub-MeV dark sink dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 111, 035027 (2025), arXiv:2408.07744 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Essig, T

    R. Essig, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, New Constraints and Prospects for sub-GeV Dark Matter Scattering off Electrons in Xenon, Phys. Rev. D96, 043017 (2017), arXiv:1703.00910 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Arnaud et al

    Q. Arnaud et al. (EDELWEISS), First germanium- based constraints on sub-MeV Dark Matter with the EDELWEISS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 141301 (2020), arXiv:2003.01046 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Aguilar-Arevalo et al

    A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC), Constraints on Light Dark Matter Particles Interacting with Elec- trons from DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 181802 (2019), arXiv:1907.12628 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Adariet al.(SENSEI), First Direct-Detection Results on Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using the SENSEI Detec- tor at SNOLAB, Phys

    P. Adariet al.(SENSEI), First Direct-Detection Results on Sub-GeV Dark Matter Using the SENSEI Detec- tor at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 011804 (2025), arXiv:2312.13342 [astro-ph.CO]. 17

    2025 arXiv

  74. [83]

    M. F. Albakryet al.(SuperCDMS), Light dark matter constraints from SuperCDMS HVeV detectors operated underground with an anticoincidence event selection, Phys. Rev. D 111, 012006 (2025), arXiv:2407.08085 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Aggarwal et al

    K. Aggarwal et al. (DAMIC-M), Probing Benchmark Models of Hidden-Sector Dark Matter with DAMIC-M (2025), arXiv:2503.14617 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Davidson, S

    S. Davidson, S. Hannestad, and G. Raffelt, Updated bounds on millicharged particles, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 003 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0001179

    2000 arXiv

  77. [86]

    J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, and H.-B. Yu, Halo Shape and Relic Density Exclusions of Sommerfeld-Enhanced Dark Matter Explanations of Cosmic Ray Excesses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 151301 (2010), arXiv:0911.0422 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  78. [87]

    H.VogelandJ.Redondo,DarkRadiationconstraintson minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon, JCAP 02, 029, arXiv:1311.2600 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  79. [88]

    Essig, M

    R. Essig, M. Fernandez-Serra, J. Mardon, A. Soto, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, Direct Detection of sub-GeV Dark Matter with Semiconductor Targets, J. High En- ergy Phys. 05, 046 (2016), arXiv:1509.01598 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  80. [89]

    H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, New limits on dark photons from solar emission and keV scale dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115022 (2020), arXiv:2006.13929 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [90]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, P. Sorantin, and S. Trickey, Full- potential, linearized augmented plane wave programs for crystalline systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 59, 399 (1990)

    1990

  82. [91]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  83. [92]

    H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, Direct Detection Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 747, 331 (2015), arXiv:1412.8378 [hep- ph]

    2015 arXiv

  84. [93]

    I. M. Bloch, R. Essig, K. Tobioka, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, Searching for Dark Absorption with Direct Detection Experiments, J. High Energy Phys.06, 087 (2017), arXiv:1608.02123 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  85. [94]

    A. E. Nelson and J. Scholtz, Dark Light, Dark Matter and the Misalignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 84, 103501 (2011), arXiv:1105.2812 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  86. [95]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi,The Physics of the Dark Photon(SpringerBriefs in Physics,

  87. [96]

    P. N. Bhattiprolu, R. McGehee, and A. Pierce, Dark sink enhances the direct detection of freeze- in dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 110, L031702 (2024), arXiv:2312.14152 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [97]

    P. Du, D. Egana-Ugrinovic, R. Essig, and M. Shola- purkar, Sources of Low-Energy Events in Low- Threshold Dark-Matter and Neutrino Detectors, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011009 (2022), arXiv:2011.13939 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  89. [98]

    I. M. Bloch et al. (SENSEI), SENSEI at SNO- LAB: Single-Electron Event Rate and Implications for Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 161002 (2025), arXiv:2410.18716 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025

  90. [99]

    Essig, Y

    R. Essig, Y. Hochberg, Y. Shoji, A. Singal, and G. Suczewski, Low-energy Compton scattering in materials, Phys. Rev. D 109, 116011 (2024), arXiv:2310.02316 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [100]

    Ramanathan and N

    K. Ramanathan and N. Kurinsky, Ionization yield in silicon for eV-scale electron-recoil processes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063026 (2020), arXiv:2004.10709 [astro-ph.IM]

    2020 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Mancuso, A

    M. Mancuso, A. Bento, N. Ferreiro Iachellini, D. Hauff, F. Petricca, F. Pröbst, J. Rothe, and R. Strauss, A method to define the energy threshold depending on noise level for rare event searches, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 940, 492 (2019), arXiv:1711.11459 [physics.ins-det]

    2019 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Prihtiadiet al.(COSINE-100), Measurement of the cosmic muon annual and diurnal flux variation with the COSINE-100 detector, J

    H. Prihtiadiet al.(COSINE-100), Measurement of the cosmic muon annual and diurnal flux variation with the COSINE-100 detector, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.02 (2021), 013, arXiv:2005.13672 [physics.ins-det]

    2021 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Ambrosio et al

    M. Ambrosio et al. (MACRO), The Search for the sidereal and solar diurnal modulations in the total MACRO muon data set, Phys. Rev. D 67, 042002 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0211119

    2003 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Cowan,Statistical Data Analysis(Clarendon Press, 1998)

    G. Cowan,Statistical Data Analysis(Clarendon Press, 1998)

    1998

  96. [105]

    Subbarao, S

    U. Subbarao, S. Sarkar, B. Joseph, and S. C. Pe- ter, Magnetic and X-ray absorption studies on the RE5X2Sb6 (RE=Eu, Yb; X=Al, Ga, In) compounds, J. Alloys Compd.658, 395 (2016)

    2016

  97. [106]

    R. Egerton, Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope, 3rd ed., The language of science Electron energy-loss spectroscopy in the electron micro- scope (Springer US, New York, NY, 2011)

    2011

  98. [107]

    F. Roth, A. König, J. Fink, B. Büchner, and M.Knupfer,Electronenergy-lossspectroscopy: Aversa- tile tool for the investigations of plasmonic excitations, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.195, 85 (2014), arXiv:1405.3369 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2014 arXiv

  99. [108]

    Hochberg, Y

    Y. Hochberg, Y. Kahn, N. Kurinsky, B. V. Lehmann, T. C. Yu, and K. K. Berggren, Determining Dark- Matter–Electron Scattering Rates from the Dielec- tric Function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151802 (2021), arXiv:2101.08263 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  100. [109]

    Schuster, J

    R. Schuster, J. Trinckauf, C. Habenicht, M. Knupfer, and B. Büchner, Anisotropic Particle-Hole Excitations in Black Phosphorus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 026404 (2015), arXiv:1503.02549 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2015 arXiv

  101. [110]

    L. I. Roest, S. E. van Heijst, L. Maduro, J. Rojo, and S. Conesa-Boj, Charting the low-loss region in Elec- tron Energy Loss Spectroscopy with machine learning, Ultramicroscopy 222, 113202 (2021), arXiv:2009.05050 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2021 arXiv

  102. [111]

    Ibach, Electron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis, Topics in Current Physics, 0342-6793 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1977)

    H. Ibach, Electron Spectroscopy for Surface Analysis, Topics in Current Physics, 0342-6793 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1977)

    1977

  103. [112]

    Ibach and D

    H. Ibach and D. L. Mills, Electron energy loss spec- troscopy and surface vibrations(Academic Press, New York, 1982)

    1982

  104. [113]

    Ibach, M

    H. Ibach, M. Balden, and S. Lehwald, Recent advances in electron energy loss spectroscopy of surface vibra- tions, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans.92, 4771 (1996)

    1996

  105. [114]

    T. D. Veal, I. Mahboob, and C. F. McConville, Nega- tive Band Gaps in DiluteInNxSb1−x Alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 136801 (2004)

    2004

  106. [115]

    Pfau and K

    A. Pfau and K. Schierbaum, The electronic structure of stoichiometric and reduced CeO2 surfaces: an XPS, UPS and HREELS study, Surf. Sci.321, 71 (1994)

    1994

  107. [116]

    Bronner, S

    C. Bronner, S. Stremlau, M. Gille, F. Brauße, A. Haase, S. Hecht, and P. Tegeder, Aligning the Band Gap of Graphene Nanoribbons by Monomer Doping, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.52, 4422 (2013). 18

    2013

  108. [117]

    S. Vig, A. Kogar, M. Mitrano, A. A. Husain, V. Mishra, M. S. Rak, L. Venema, P. D. Johnson, G. D. Gu, E. Fradkin, M. R. Norman, and P. Abbamonte, Mea- surement of the dynamic charge response of materials using low-energy, momentum-resolved electron energy- loss spectroscopy (M...

    2017 arXiv

  109. [118]

    D. L. Mills, The scattering of low energy electrons by electric field fluctuations near crystal surfaces, Surf. Sci. 48, 59 (1975)

    1975

  110. [119]

    A. A. Lucas and J. P. Vigneron, Theory of electron en- ergy loss spectroscopy from surfaces of anisotropic ma- terials, Solid State Commun.49, 327 (1984)

    1984

  111. [120]

    Y. Chen, J. C. Barnard, R. E. Palmer, M. O. Watanabe, and T. Sasaki, Indirect Band Gap of Light-Emitting BC2N, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2406 (1999)

    1999

  112. [121]

    C.C.Homes, M.Reedyk, D.A.Cradles,andT.Timusk, Technique for measuring the reflectance of irregu- lar, submillimeter-sized samples, Appl. Opt. 32, 2976 (1993)

    1993

  113. [122]

    Aguilar-Arevaloet al.(DAMIC), Characterization of thebackgroundspectruminDAMICatSNOLAB,Phys

    A. Aguilar-Arevaloet al.(DAMIC), Characterization of thebackgroundspectruminDAMICatSNOLAB,Phys. Rev. D 105, 062003 (2022), arXiv:2110.13133 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  114. [123]

    E. W. Hoppe, C. E. Aalseth, O. T. Farmer, T. W. Hoss- bach, M. Liezers, H. S. Miley, N. R. Overman, and J. H. Reeves, Reduction of radioactive backgrounds in elec- troformed copper for ultra-sensitive radiation detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A764, 116 (2014)

    2014

  115. [124]

    Abgrall et al

    N. Abgrall et al. (Majorana), The Majorana Demonstrator radioassay program, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 828, 22 (2016), arXiv:1601.03779 [physics.ins- det]

    2016 arXiv

  116. [125]

    Allisonet al., Recent developments inGeant4, Nucl

    J. Allisonet al., Recent developments inGeant4, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A835, 186 (2016)

    2016

  117. [126]

    Pfeiffer, A

    L. Pfeiffer, A. P. Mills, E. A. Chandross, and T. Kovacs, Beta spectrum of115In, Phys. Rev. C19, 1035 (1979)

    1979

  118. [127]

    C. M. Cattadori, M. De Deo, M. Laubenstein, L. Pan- dola, and V. I. Tretyak, Observation of beta decay of In-115 to the first excited level of Sn-115, Nucl. Phys. A 748, 333 (2005), arXiv:nucl-ex/0407016

    2005 arXiv

  119. [128]

    J. C. Souza, S. M. Thomas, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thomp- son, F. Ronning, P. G. Pagliuso, and P. F. S. Rosa, Microscopic probe of magnetic polarons in antiferro- magnetic Eu5In2Sb6, Phys. Rev. B105, 035135 (2022), arXiv:2201.04464 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2022 arXiv

  120. [129]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, J. Luitz, R. Laskowsk, F. Tran, L. Marks, and L. Marks, WIEN2k: An Augmented Plane Wave Plus Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Proper- ties (Techn. Universitat, 2019)

    2019

  121. [130]

    Blaha, K

    P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, F. Tran, R. Laskowski, G. K. Madsen, and L. D. Marks, WIEN2k: An APW+lo pro- gram for calculating the properties of solids, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074101 (2020)

    2020

  122. [131]

    R. M. Dreizler and E. K. Gross,Density functional the- ory: an approach to the quantum many-body problem (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  123. [132]

    Himmetoglu, A

    B. Himmetoglu, A. Floris, S. de Gironcoli, and M. Co- coccioni, Hubbard-corrected DFT energy functionals: The LDA+U description of correlated systems, Int. J. QuantumChem. 114,14(2014),arXiv:1309.3355[cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

    2014 arXiv

  124. [133]

    Garrick, A

    R. Garrick, A. Natan, T. Gould, and L. Kronik, Exact GeneralizedKohn-ShamTheoryforHybridFunctionals, Phys. Rev. X10, 021040 (2020)

    2020

  125. [134]

    Pokharel, C

    K. Pokharel, C. Lane, J. W. Furness, R. Zhang, J. Ning, B. Barbiellini, R. S. Markiewicz, Y. Zhang, A. Ban- sil, and J. Sun, Sensitivity of the electronic and mag- netic structures of cuprate superconductors to density functional approximations, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 31 (2022)...

    2022

  126. [135]

    Onida, L

    G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Electronic exci- tations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s- function approaches, Rev. Mod. Phys.74, 601 (2002)

    2002

  127. [136]

    Di Valentin, S

    C. Di Valentin, S. Botti, and M. Cococcioni,First prin- ciples approaches to spectroscopic properties of complex materials, Vol. 347 (Springer, 2014)

    2014

  128. [137]

    Kuneš, R

    J. Kuneš, R. Arita, P. Wissgott, A. Toschi, H. Ikeda, and K. Held, Wien2wannier: From linearized aug- mented plane waves to maximally localized Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun.181, 1888 (2010), arXiv:1004.3934 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    2010 arXiv

  129. [138]

    Dressel and G

    M. Dressel and G. Grüner,Electrodynamics of solids: optical properties of electrons in matter (Cambridge University Press, 2002)

    2002

  130. [139]

    Zhu,Bogoliubov-de Gennes method and its appli- cations, Vol

    J.-X. Zhu,Bogoliubov-de Gennes method and its appli- cations, Vol. 924 (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  131. [140]

    I. M. Ruzin and B. I. Shklovskii, Theory of hopping con- ductivity due to long-wavelength excitation, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 23, 1164 (1989)

    1989

  132. [141]

    C. Lane, R. Zhang, B. Barbiellini, R. S. Markiewicz, A. Bansil, J. Sun, and J.-X. Zhu, Competing incom- mensurate spin fluctuations and magnetic excitations in infinite-layer nickelate superconductors, Commun. Phys. 6, 90 (2023), arXiv:2208.08375 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  133. [142]

    Mayetet al., A review of the discovery reach of direc- tional Dark Matter detection, Phys

    F. Mayetet al., A review of the discovery reach of direc- tional Dark Matter detection, Phys. Rep.627, 1 (2016), arXiv:1602.03781 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  134. [143]

    Blanco, Y

    C. Blanco, Y. Kahn, B. Lillard, and S. D. McDer- mott, Dark Matter Daily Modulation With Anisotropic Organic Crystals, Phys. Rev. D 104, 036011 (2021), arXiv:2103.08601 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  135. [144]

    J. I. Collar and F. T. Avignone III, Diurnal modulation effects in cold dark matter experiments, Phys. Lett. B 275, 181 (1992)

    1992

  136. [145]

    J. I. Collar and F. T. Avignone III, The Effect of elastic scatteringintheEarthoncolddarkmatterexperiments, Phys. Rev. D47, 5238 (1993)

    1993

  137. [146]

    Hasenbalg, D

    F. Hasenbalg, D. Abriola, F. T. Avignone III, J. I. Collar, D. E. Di Gregorio, A. O. Gattone, H. Huck, D. Tomasi, and I. Urteaga, Cold dark matter identifi- cation: Diurnal modulation revisited, Phys. Rev. D55, 7350 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9702165

    1997 arXiv

  138. [147]

    Kouvaris and I

    C. Kouvaris and I. M. Shoemaker, Daily modulation as a smoking gun of dark matter with significant stopping rate, Phys. Rev. D90, 095011 (2014), arXiv:1405.1729 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  139. [148]

    Kouvaris and N

    C. Kouvaris and N. G. Nielsen, Daily modulation and gravitational focusing in direct dark matter search experiments, Phys. Rev. D 92, 075016 (2015), arXiv:1505.02615 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  140. [149]

    Emken, R

    T. Emken, R. Essig, C. Kouvaris, and M. Sholapurkar, Direct Detection of Strongly Interacting Sub-GeV Dark Matter via Electron Recoils, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2019), 070, arXiv:1905.06348 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  141. [150]

    Ávaloset al., Skipper CCDs for the search of a daily modulation of Dark Matter signal in the DMSQUARE experiment, J

    N. Ávaloset al., Skipper CCDs for the search of a daily modulation of Dark Matter signal in the DMSQUARE experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2156, 012074 (2021). 19

    2021

  142. [151]

    Arnquistet al

    I. Arnquistet al. (DAMIC-M), Search for Daily Mod- ulation of MeV Dark Matter Signals with DAMIC-M, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 101006 (2024), arXiv:2307.07251 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  143. [152]

    Bertou, A

    X. Bertou, A. Desai, T. Emken, R. Essig, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu, Earth-Scattering Induced Modulation in Low-Threshold Dark Matter Experiments (2025), arXiv:2507.00344 [hep-ph]. Appendix A: Synthesis and Characterization of Eu 5In2Sb6

    2025

  144. [154]

    Synthesis and Growth Optimization To reveal the intrinsic properties of semiconductors and certify their readiness for applications, the synthe- sis of high-quality single crystals is indispensable. For instance, the precise synthesis of single-crystalline sili- con achieved d...

    2016

  145. [155]

    Bandgap Extraction from Electrical Resistance Measurements At temperatures of ∼20 K and above, the electrical resistance of our Eu 5In2Sb6 samples is dominated by thermal excitation of electrons across the bandgap, and, therefore, a reliable inference of a thermally activated ...

  146. [156]

    AC Hall Measurements To characterize the narrow-gap transport properties of Eu5In2Sb6, we measured the temperature dependence of the carrier mobility and concentration using the AC Hall effect. This method was chosen over the traditional DC Hall effect as the offset voltage fr...

  147. [157]

    The response to light for multiple Eu 5In2Sb6 samples was measured with the following setup

    Photoresponse We investigated the photoresponsiveness of Eu5In2Sb6 to ensure its viability as a detector target material. The response to light for multiple Eu 5In2Sb6 samples was measured with the following setup. A1300 nmlaser was coupled into a super guide SFS1500 multi-mod...

  148. [158]

    Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy The interaction of dark matter with solid-state tar- gets is hypothesized to occur via conventional particle scattering, which has a rich history in condensed mat- ter physics. In the simplest case in which dark mat- ter interactions with elec...

  149. [159]

    F ourier T ransform Infrared Spectroscopy Optical conductivity measurements are a complemen- tary probe of the electronic structure and can there- fore help elucidate the results found from the M-EELS measurement. We performed Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy on ...

  150. [160]

    Natural elements like uranium and tho- rium are common sources of radioactivity in most mate- rials [123]

    Radiological Impurities Radiological impurities are a significant concern of experiments searching for dark matter and other rare events [122]. Natural elements like uranium and tho- rium are common sources of radioactivity in most mate- rials [123]. These radioactive backgrou...

    1949

  151. [161]

    scissor correction

    Band Structure To obtain the electronic band structure of Eu5In2Sb6, DFT calculations were performed using the full po- tential linearized augmented plane-wave+local orbitals (L/APW+lo) method [90, 129] as implemented in the WIEN2k code [130]. Exchange-correlation effects were...

  152. [162]

    51YY/6IeqRIXZ36xK9Njbkeg4Q4=

    Response F unctions To facilitate the evaluation of the response functions over a dense k-point grid in the Brillouin zone, we employed a real-space tight-binding model Hamiltonian (obtained via the Wien2Wannier interface [137]) to in- terpolate the ab initio electronic band s...

  153. [2020]

    arXiv:2005.01515 [hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.