Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey on Video Anomaly Detection via Deep Learning: Human, Vehicle, and Environment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.14203 v1 pith:XVX7PKND submitted 2025-08-19 cs.CV cs.AI

A Survey on Video Anomaly Detection via Deep Learning: Human, Vehicle, and Environment

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords learningacrossanomalydetectionsurveychallengesdeepfundamental
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) has emerged as a pivotal task in computer vision, with broad relevance across multiple fields. Recent advances in deep learning have driven significant progress in this area, yet the field remains fragmented across domains and learning paradigms. This survey offers a comprehensive perspective on VAD, systematically organizing the literature across various supervision levels, as well as adaptive learning methods such as online, active, and continual learning. We examine the state of VAD across three major application categories: human-centric, vehicle-centric, and environment-centric scenarios, each with distinct challenges and design considerations. In doing so, we identify fundamental contributions and limitations of current methodologies. By consolidating insights from subfields, we aim to provide the community with a structured foundation for advancing both theoretical understanding and real-world applicability of VAD systems. This survey aims to support researchers by providing a useful reference, while also drawing attention to the broader set of open challenges in anomaly detection, including both fundamental research questions and practical obstacles to real-world deployment.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CaC: Advancing Video Reward Models via Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Concentrating

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CaC is a hierarchical spatiotemporal concentrating reward model for video anomalies that reports 25.7% accuracy gains on fine-grained benchmarks and 11.7% anomaly reduction in generated videos via a new dataset and GR...

  2. CaC: Advancing Video Reward Models via Hierarchical Spatiotemporal Concentrating

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CaC presents a new spatiotemporal concentrating reward model for video anomalies, built on a novel large-scale dataset and three-stage training with RL and IoU rewards, claiming 25.7% accuracy gains and 11.7% anomaly ...

  3. Probing Collision Grounding in Vision-Language Models for Safe Human-Robot Collaboration

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TouchSafeBench evaluates VLMs on collision grounding, finding best Macro-F1 below 50% and that explicit depth does not yield reliable robot-body contact inference.

  4. Are Multimodal LLMs Ready for Surveillance? A Reality Check on Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection in the Wild

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Zero-shot MLLMs on ShanghaiTech and CHAD exhibit strong conservative bias with high precision but collapsed recall; class-specific prompts raise peak F1 from 0.09 to 0.64 yet recall remains the bottleneck.