Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Integrated Take-off Management and Trajectory Optimization for Merging Control in Urban Air Mobility Corridors

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A structured take-off airspace design plus a hierarchical management strategy lets urban air mobility corridors coordinate take-off and merging traffic with strict safety, higher efficiency, and lower computation cost.

desk verdict Plausible UAM scheduling paper with a clever airspace idea, but the abstract can't support the strong safety and efficiency claims; worth a full review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15395 v1 pith:GWW7RE7U submitted 2025-08-21 math.OC cs.SYeess.SY

Yingqi Liu , Tianlu Pan , Jingjun Tan , Renxin Zhong , Can Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OCcs.SYeess.SY
keywords UrbanAirMobilitytake-offmanagementmergingcontroltrajectoryoptimizationairspacedesignhierarchicalschedulingconflict-freeoperations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the hardest part of urban air mobility—getting many aircraft off the ground and merged into a single corridor without collisions—can be made tractable by redesigning the take-off airspace itself. The authors propose a novel take-off airspace layout that deliberately simplifies the aircraft dynamics relevant during climb and merge, which cuts the dimensionality of the trajectory optimization problem. On top of this, they build a hierarchical two-level strategy: a tactical scheduler sets take-off times and picks dynamic merging points, and an operational optimizer plans each aircraft's trajectory to that point under safety constraints. Simulations against fixed- and dynamic-merging-point baselines indicate that the proposed strategy is more efficient, cheaper to compute, and safe across corridor traffic conditions. If true, this would make large-scale UAM corridor operations more feasible computationally and operationally.

What carries the argument

The central object is the proposed take-off airspace design, a structured layout that constrains trajectories so that aircraft dynamics can be reduced to a simplified model, thereby lowering the dimension of the trajectory optimization. The second mechanism is the HCTMM hierarchy: a tactical scheduling algorithm (take-off time coordination and dynamic merging-point selection) feeding an operational trajectory optimizer that solves a low-dimensional, obstacle-light optimal control problem per aircraft.

What would settle it

Run a high-fidelity simulation (or scaled flight test) of the HCTMM strategy using a full six-degree-of-freedom rotorcraft model with wind gusts and wake interaction at the claimed corridor densities, and check whether the optimized merging trajectories remain within the flight envelope and maintain separation; if any aircraft exits its envelope or violates minimum separation, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the take-off airspace can be designed so that aircraft dynamics simplify enough to make real-time trajectory optimization for merging control tractable, and that a hierarchical coordinated take-off and merging management (HCTMM) strategy built on this design strictly preserves safety. The tactical layer decides when each aircraft takes off and where it will merge, reducing conflicts before they happen; the operational layer then computes a safe, efficient trajectory to the chosen dynamic merging point. Simulation results claim significant gains in operational efficiency and lower computational burden compared to strategies with fixed or dynamic merging points, with

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the take-off airspace design simplifies aircraft dynamics enough to reduce the trajectory optimization dimension while still representing real vehicles during climb and merge—if that simplification misses effects like gusts, rotor limits, wake interaction, or actuation delays, the optimized trajectories may not be flyable and the safety assurance only holds in simulation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claims hold, UAM corridor operations near vertiports could handle higher take-off and merge rates without sacrificing safety, by offloading conflict resolution to the scheduling layer.
  • The computational cost of per-aircraft trajectory optimization would drop enough to support real-time or near-real-time replanning as corridor traffic changes.
  • The airspace-design principle generalizes: deliberately structuring airspace to simplify dynamics may make other UAM operations, such as landing sequencing or intersection crossing, computationally feasible.
  • Safety assurance would rest on the reduced-order model being faithful; the paper's 'strict safety' is conditional on that model capturing the real forces and constraints.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hierarchy—simplify the geometry first, then schedule, then optimize trajectories—could be tested in other high-density traffic domains, such as drone delivery networks converging on a central hub, where the claim that geometry redesign reduces optimizer complexity is likely transferable.
  • A concrete extension would be to run the HCTMM strategy with a full six-degree-of-freedom vehicle model in a wind field, to see at what corridor density the simplified-dynamics assumption starts to produce infeasible or unsafe trajectories.
  • The dynamic merging-point selection could be decoupled from take-off time scheduling and treated as a separate online decision problem; the paper's simulation suggests the joint scheduling is beneficial, but the marginal value of dynamic merging points over fixed ones is testable.
  • The take-off airspace design is described as one of the first; if adopted, standards bodies could codify such a geometry to make certification of autonomous merging control more predictable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an integrated take-off management and trajectory optimization approach for merging control in Urban Air Mobility (UAM) corridors. It introduces a structured take-off airspace design and a hierarchical coordinated take-off and merging management (HCTMM) strategy: a tactical level schedules take-off times and selects dynamic merging points, while an operational level optimizes trajectories to those merging points under safety constraints. The abstract claims that the airspace design simplifies aircraft dynamics and reduces the dimensionality of the trajectory optimization problem, that HCTMM strictly ensures safety, and that simulations show significant improvements in operational efficiency and computational burden compared to representative fixed- and dynamic-merging-point strategies, with further scalability results.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the paper would offer a practical decomposition for UAM corridor operations: a structured airspace design that enables lower-dimensional trajectory optimization, combined with a hierarchical scheduling/optimization strategy. The emphasis on computationally efficient coordination and explicit safety constraints is timely. The novelty of the take-off airspace design and the hierarchical treatment of merging are credit-worthy. However, the current evidence base is not presented with enough specificity or quantification to establish the claims as stated, and the safety guarantee depends on the fidelity of the reduced-order dynamics, which is not documented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Airspace design] The abstract states that the take-off airspace design 'can simplify aircraft dynamics' and that HCTMM 'strictly ensures safety.' This is load-bearing, yet the paper does not specify which dynamics are simplified, which states/constraints are removed, or why the simplified model remains representative for real UAM vehicles. If the reduced-order model omits actuator rate limits, rotorcraft flight-envelope boundaries, wind gusts, or wake interactions, then 'strictly ensures safety' holds only inside the simulator. Please state the modeling assumptions explicitly and provide a verification or argument that trajectories optimized under the simplified dynamics satisfy the full set of safety and flyability constraints under representative disturbances.
  2. [Abstract / Simulation results] The abstract asserts 'significantly improves operational efficiency and reduces computational burden,' but no quantitative results are reported: no traffic densities, no effect sizes, no run counts, no baseline configuration details, and no statistical or variability measures. Without these, the claimed improvements cannot be evaluated. The manuscript should include the experimental setup and the actual performance numbers (e.g., throughput, delay, solve time) across the tested conditions.
  3. [Abstract / Baselines] The comparison is made to 'representative strategies with fixed or dynamic merging points,' but those baselines are not named or described in the abstract, and the selection criteria are not given. This raises a risk of weak-baseline comparison. Define the baseline algorithms precisely, state why they are representative, and ensure the comparison is apples-to-apples in terms of objective function, constraints, and computational resources.
  4. [Hierarchical strategy] The tactical-level scheduling algorithm and the operational-level trajectory optimization are described only at a high level. The coupling between these levels—especially how the dynamic merging point is selected and updated, and how the operational optimizer guarantees the tactical schedule is feasible—is central to the safety claim. A precise problem formulation, including all constraints and assumptions, is needed to assess whether the claim of strict safety is internally consistent.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'strictly ensures safety' should be qualified with 'under the modeled conditions' unless a formal safety proof or full-envelope verification is provided. Also, HCTMM is not defined in the abstract; spell out the acronym at first use.
  2. [Notation] Define corridor traffic conditions (density, flow, mix of aircraft types) and separation standards (minimum distance, time headway) explicitly when reporting simulation scenarios.
  3. [Scalability] The scalability claim would be strengthened by reporting how computational cost grows with the number of aircraft and corridor length, not just a single scalability figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified from the available text; the design-to-simulation comparison is externally benchmarked and the airspace-design premise is a modeling assumption, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The provided text contains only the abstract, so the full derivation chain and equations are not visible. From what is shown, the paper proposes a take-off airspace design and a hierarchical strategy (HCTMM) that are evaluated against fixed and dynamic merging point baselines. There is no step in the abstract that defines a key quantity in terms of the very result it is supposed to explain or predict. The statement that 'the take-off airspace design can simplify aircraft dynamics and thus reduce the dimensionality of the trajectory optimization problem' is a design assumption and a modeling claim, not a circular definition: it does not presuppose the operational efficiency or safety results it is used to produce. Similarly, 'strictly ensures safety' is a simulation-based claim whose validity may depend on unstated reduced-order dynamics, but that is a correctness or modeling-fidelity concern, not a circularity concern. The comparisons to representative strategies with fixed or dynamic merging points are, in principle, external falsifiable benchmarks; even if the baselines are unnamed, that is a benchmarking transparency issue rather than a derivation-level circularity. No self-citation load-bearing chain, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction is visible in the supplied text. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review. All quantities are inferred from the abstract; a full audit requires the manuscript. The paper's claims rest on three modeling assumptions (simplified dynamics, representative traffic scenarios, and an encoded safety model), one unlisted set of tuning parameters, and one introduced entity (the structured take-off airspace), which has no external evidence beyond the paper's own simulations.

free parameters (1)
  • Scheduling and separation parameters (e.g., minimum separation distance, time headway, merging-point update rate)
    The traffic and safety claims depend on these scheduling, separation, and merging-point tuning values, but the abstract discloses none; a full audit requires the manuscript.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Aircraft dynamics during take-off and merging can be simplified (reduced-order model) without losing the behavior relevant to safety and efficiency.
    Abstract: 'the take-off airspace design can simplify aircraft dynamics and thus reduce the dimensionality of the trajectory optimization problem'. If the simplification drops coupling effects (wind, wake, actuation limits), the optimized trajectories may not be flyable.
  • domain assumption Simulated corridor traffic conditions are representative of real UAM operations.
    The abstract claims results 'under various corridor traffic conditions', all evaluated in simulation; representativeness of the demand and traffic models is assumed.
  • domain assumption The safety model used in simulation (separation constraints enforced by the optimizer) matches operational safety requirements.
    The abstract claims HCTMM 'strictly ensures safety'; this can only mean safety with respect to the constraints encoded in the simulator, which is an assumption about the safety model.
invented entities (1)
  • Structured take-off airspace design
    purpose: Simplify aircraft dynamics, reduce trajectory optimization dimensionality, and mitigate obstacle avoidance complexity during take-off and merging.
    The structured take-off airspace is the paper's main introduced design element; its claimed benefits (simpler dynamics, lower-dimensional optimization) are demonstrated only in the paper's own simulations, with no external deployment or independent benchmark.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrated Take-off Management and Trajectory Optimization for Merging Control in Urban Air Mobility Corridors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GWW7RE7U

@misc{pith2026250815395,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrated Take-off Management and Trajectory Optimization for Merging Control in Urban Air Mobility Corridors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GWW7RE7U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15395}
}
read the original abstract

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) has the potential to revolutionize daily transportation, offering rapid and efficient aerial mobility services. Take-off and merging phases are critical for air corridor operations, requiring the coordination of take-off aircraft and corridor traffic while ensuring safety and seamless transition. This paper proposes an integrated take-off management and trajectory optimization for merging control in UAM corridors. We first introduce a novel take-off airspace design. To our knowledge, this paper is one of the first to propose a structured design for take-off airspace. Based on the take-off airspace design, we devise a hierarchical coordinated take-off and merging management (HCTMM) strategy. To be specific, the take-off airspace design can simplify aircraft dynamics and thus reduce the dimensionality of the trajectory optimization problem whilst mitigating obstacle avoidance complexities. The HCTMM strategy strictly ensures safety and improves the efficiency of take-off and merging operations. At the tactical level, a scheduling algorithm coordinates aircraft take-off times and selects dynamic merging points to reduce conflicts and ensure smooth take-off and merging processes. At the operational level, a trajectory optimization strategy ensures that each aircraft reaches the dynamic merging point efficiently while satisfying safety constraints. Simulation results show that, compared to representative strategies with fixed or dynamic merging points, the HCTMM strategy significantly improves operational efficiency and reduces computational burden, while ensuring safety under various corridor traffic conditions. Further results confirm the scalability of the HCTMM strategy and the computational efficiency enabled by the proposed take-off airspace design.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Real-time Traffic Simulation and Management for Large-scale Urban Air Mobility: Integrating Route Guidance and Collision Avoidance

    eess.SY 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A UAM traffic management framework that centralizes route planning and adds distributed collision avoidance raises simulated separation by 98%, travel speed by 70%, and trip completion by 130%.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    D., 1999

    Anderson, J. D., 1999. Aircraft performance and design, volume 1221. McGraw-Hill New York

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Armijos, A. S. C., Li, A., Cassandras, C. G., Al-Nadawi, Y. K., Araki, H., Chalaki, B., Moradi-Pari, E., Mahjoub, H. N., and Tadiparthi, V., 2024. Cooperative energy and time-optimal lane change maneuvers with minimal highway traffic disruption. Automatica, 165: 0 111651

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    and Rakas, J., 2021

    Bauranov, A. and Rakas, J., 2021. Designing airspace for urban air mobility: A review of concepts and approaches. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 125: 0 100726

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 39th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology--ISAT 2018: Part I, volume 852

    Borzemski, L., \'S wi a tek, J., and Wilimowska, Z., 2018. Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 39th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology--ISAT 2018: Part I, volume 852. Springer

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Urban Air Mobility (UAM) concept of operations v1.0

    Bradford, S., 2020. Urban Air Mobility (UAM) concept of operations v1.0 . Available at: https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/Urban

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    An integrated approach to optimal merging sequence generation and trajectory planning of connected automated vehicles for freeway on-ramp merging sections

    Chen, J., Zhou, Y., and Chung, E., 2023. An integrated approach to optimal merging sequence generation and trajectory planning of connected automated vehicles for freeway on-ramp merging sections. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25 0 (2): 0 1897--1912

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    D., Brittain, M., and Wei, P., 2024

    Chen, S., Evans, A. D., Brittain, M., and Wei, P., 2024. Integrated conflict management for UAM with strategic demand capacity balancing and learning-based tactical deconfliction . IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25 0 (8): 0 10049--10061

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    P., Shaheen, S

    Cohen, A. P., Shaheen, S. A., and Farrar, E. M., 2021. Urban air mobility: History, ecosystem, market potential, and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22 0 (9): 0 6074--6087

    work page 2021

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    and Mahmassani, H

    Cummings, C. and Mahmassani, H. S., 2023. Measuring the impact of airspace restrictions on air traffic flow using four-dimensional system fundamental diagrams for urban air mobility. Transportation Research Record, 2677 0 (1): 0 1012--1026

    2023

  2. [10]

    A reinforcement learning approach to vehicle coordination for structured advanced air mobility

    Deniz, S., Wu, Y., Shi, Y., and Wang, Z., 2024. A reinforcement learning approach to vehicle coordination for structured advanced air mobility. Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, 3 0 (2): 0 100157

    2024

  3. [11]

    M., 2022

    Doole, M., Ellerbroek, J., and Hoekstra, J. M., 2022. Investigation of merge assist policies to improve safety of drone traffic in a constrained urban airspace. Aerospace, 9 0 (3): 0 120

    2022

  4. [12]

    A hierarchical approach for splitting truck platoons near network discontinuities

    Duret, A., Wang, M., and Ladino, A., 2020. A hierarchical approach for splitting truck platoons near network discontinuities. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 132: 0 285--302

    2020

  5. [13]

    Easy Access Rules for small category VCA (SC-VTOL + MOC) (Revision 0)

    EASA, 2024. Easy Access Rules for small category VCA (SC-VTOL + MOC) (Revision 0) . Available at: https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/easy-access-rules-small-category-vca

    2024

  6. [14]

    A fixed air corridor model for UAS traffic management in urban areas

    El Asslouj, A., Uppaluru, H., Ramezani, M., Atkins, E., and Rastgoftar, H., 2024. A fixed air corridor model for UAS traffic management in urban areas. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 60 0 (5): 0 5651--5662

    2024

  7. [15]

    Urban Air Mobility (UAM) concept of operations v2.0

    Fontaine, P., 2023. Urban Air Mobility (UAM) concept of operations v2.0 . Available at: https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/Urban

    2023

  8. [16]

    Hybrid swarm intelligent algorithm for multi- UAV formation reconfiguration

    Gao, C., Ma, J., Li, T., and Shen, Y., 2023. Hybrid swarm intelligent algorithm for multi- UAV formation reconfiguration. Complex & Intelligent Systems , 9 0 (2): 0 1929--1962

    2023

  9. [17]

    Optimal trajectory planning of connected and automated vehicles at on-ramp merging area

    Gao, Z., Wu, Z., Hao, W., Long, K., Byon, Y.-J., and Long, K., 2021. Optimal trajectory planning of connected and automated vehicles at on-ramp merging area. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23 0 (8): 0 12675--12687

    2021

  10. [18]

    Modeling power consumptions for multirotor UAVs

    Gong, H., Huang, B., Jia, B., and Dai, H., 2023. Modeling power consumptions for multirotor UAVs . IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59 0 (6): 0 7409--7422

    2023

  11. [19]

    A route network planning method for urban air delivery

    He, X., He, F., Li, L., Zhang, L., and Xiao, G., 2022. A route network planning method for urban air delivery. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 166: 0 102872

    2022

  12. [20]

    Bi-level collaborative optimization for medical consumable order splitting and reorganization considering multi-dimensional and multi-scale characteristics

    Jiang, P., Guo, S., and Luo, X., 2025. Bi-level collaborative optimization for medical consumable order splitting and reorganization considering multi-dimensional and multi-scale characteristics. Applied Sciences, 15 0 (14): 0 7627

    2025

  13. [21]

    Coordination of mixed platoons and eco-driving strategy for a signal-free intersection

    Jiang, S., Pan, T., Zhong, R., Chen, C., Li, X.-a., and Wang, S., 2022. Coordination of mixed platoons and eco-driving strategy for a signal-free intersection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24 0 (6): 0 6597--6613

    2022

  14. [22]

    J., 2019

    Jing, S., Hui, F., Zhao, X., Rios-Torres, J., and Khattak, A. J., 2019. Cooperative game approach to optimal merging sequence and on-ramp merging control of connected and automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20 0 (11): 0 4234--4244

    2019

  15. [23]

    J., 2022

    Jing, S., Hui, F., Zhao, X., Rios-Torres, J., and Khattak, A. J., 2022. Integrated longitudinal and lateral hierarchical control of cooperative merging of connected and automated vehicles at on-ramps. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23 0 (12): 0 24248--24262

    2022

  16. [24]

    E., 2016

    Kopardekar, P., Rios, J., Prevot, T., Johnson, M., Jung, J., and Robinson, J. E., 2016. Unmanned aircraft system traffic management ( UTM ) concept of operations. In AIAA AVIATION Forum and Exposition, number ARC-E-DAA-TN32838

    2016

  17. [25]

    A., and Arneson, H., 2022

    Lee, H., Moolchandani, K. A., and Arneson, H., 2022. Demand capacity balancing at vertiports for initial strategic conflict management of urban air mobility operations. In 2022 IEEE/AIAA 41st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), pages 1--10. IEEE

    2022

  18. [26]

    Bilevel learning for large-scale flexible flow shop scheduling

    Li, L., Fu, X., Zhen, H.-L., Yuan, M., Wang, J., Lu, J., Tong, X., Zeng, J., and Schnieders, D., 2022. Bilevel learning for large-scale flexible flow shop scheduling. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 168: 0 108140

    2022

  19. [27]

    Conflict-free arrival and departure trajectory planning for parallel runway with advanced point-merge system

    Liang, M., Delahaye, D., and Marechal, P., 2018. Conflict-free arrival and departure trajectory planning for parallel runway with advanced point-merge system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95: 0 207--227

    2018

  20. [28]

    Flight analysis and optimization design of vectored thrust eVTOL based on cooperative flight/propulsion control

    Liu, M., Su, Z., Zhu, J., Guo, F., and You, Y., 2024. Flight analysis and optimization design of vectored thrust eVTOL based on cooperative flight/propulsion control. Aerospace Science and Technology, 149: 0 109143

    2024

  21. [29]

    Multi-phase vertical take-off and landing trajectory optimization with feasible initial guesses

    Lu, Z., Hong, H., and Holzapfel, F., 2023. Multi-phase vertical take-off and landing trajectory optimization with feasible initial guesses. Aerospace, 11 0 (1): 0 39

    2023

  22. [30]

    Y., Anand, A., Weit, C

    Mayakonda, M., Justin, C. Y., Anand, A., Weit, C. J., Wen, J., Zaidi, T., and Mavris, D., 2020. A top-down methodology for global urban air mobility demand estimation. In Aiaa Aviation 2020 Forum, page 3255

    2020

  23. [31]

    Event triggered rolling horizon based systematical trajectory planning for merging platoons at mainline-ramp intersection

    Mu, C., Du, L., and Zhao, X., 2021. Event triggered rolling horizon based systematical trajectory planning for merging platoons at mainline-ramp intersection. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 125: 0 103006

    2021

  24. [32]

    Energy-optimal trajectory planning for solar-powered aircraft using soft actor-critic

    Ni, W., Bi, Y., Wu, D., and Ma, X., 2022. Energy-optimal trajectory planning for solar-powered aircraft using soft actor-critic. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35 0 (10): 0 337--353

    2022

  25. [33]

    Trajectory optimization for takeoff and landing phase of UAM considering energy and safety

    Park, J., Kim, I., Suk, J., and Kim, S., 2023. Trajectory optimization for takeoff and landing phase of UAM considering energy and safety . Aerospace Science and Technology, 140: 0 108489

    2023

  26. [34]

    Patterson, M. A. and Rao, A. V., 2014. GPOPS - 2 : A MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive G aussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 41 0 (1): 0 1--37

    2014

  27. [35]

    Time-and energy-saving potentials of efficient urban air mobility airspace structures

    Preis, L., Husemann, M., and Shamiyeh, M., 2023. Time-and energy-saving potentials of efficient urban air mobility airspace structures. AIAA Journal, 61 0 (12): 0 5571--5583

    2023

  28. [36]

    Introduction to multicopter design and control, volume 10

    Quan, Q., 2017. Introduction to multicopter design and control, volume 10. Springer

    2017

  29. [37]

    Aircraft scheduling optimization model for on-ramp of corridors-in-the-sky

    Ren, J., Qu, S., Wang, L., Ma, L., and Lu, T., 2023. Aircraft scheduling optimization model for on-ramp of corridors-in-the-sky. Electronic Research Archive, 31 0 (6)

    2023

  30. [38]

    C., and Marston, V

    Sacharny, D., Henderson, T. C., and Marston, V. V., 2022. Lane-based large-scale UAS traffic management. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23 0 (10): 0 18835--18844

    2022

  31. [39]

    Saouabi, M. D. E., Nouri, H. E., and Belkahla Driss, O., 2024. A two-level evolutionary algorithm for dynamic scheduling in flexible job shop environment. Evolutionary Intelligence, 17 0 (5): 0 4133--4153

    2024

  32. [40]

    Convex optimization-based trajectory planning for quadrotors landing on aerial vehicle carriers

    Shen, Z., Zhou, G., Huang, H., Huang, C., Wang, Y., and Wang, F.-Y., 2023. Convex optimization-based trajectory planning for quadrotors landing on aerial vehicle carriers. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 9 0 (1): 0 138--150

    2023

  33. [41]

    Cooperative merging strategy in mixed traffic based on optimal final-state phase diagram with flexible highway merging points

    Shi, J., Li, K., Chen, C., Kong, W., and Luo, Y., 2023. Cooperative merging strategy in mixed traffic based on optimal final-state phase diagram with flexible highway merging points. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24 0 (10): 0 11185--11197

    2023

  34. [42]

    Generating safe corridors roadmap for urban air mobility

    Sl \'a ma, J., V \'a n a, P., and Faigl, J., 2022. Generating safe corridors roadmap for urban air mobility. In 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 11866--11871. IEEE

    2022

  35. [43]

    Optimal vertiport airspace and approach control strategy for urban air mobility ( UAM )

    Song, K., 2022. Optimal vertiport airspace and approach control strategy for urban air mobility ( UAM ). Sustainability, 15 0 (1): 0 437

    2022

  36. [44]

    Metropolis: Relating airspace structure and capacity for extreme traffic densities

    Sunil, E., Hoekstra, J., Ellerbroek, J., Bussink, F., Nieuwenhuisen, D., Vidosavljevic, A., and Kern, S., 2015. Metropolis: Relating airspace structure and capacity for extreme traffic densities. In ATM seminar 2015, 11th USA/EUROPE Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar

    2015

  37. [45]

    A novel hierarchical cooperative merging control model of connected and automated vehicles featuring flexible merging positions in system optimization

    Tang, Z., Zhu, H., Zhang, X., Iryo-Asano, M., and Nakamura, H., 2022. A novel hierarchical cooperative merging control model of connected and automated vehicles featuring flexible merging positions in system optimization. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, ...

    2022

  38. [46]

    Formation reconstruction and trajectory replanning for multi- UAV patrol

    Wang, Y., Yue, Y., Shan, M., He, L., and Wang, D., 2021 a . Formation reconstruction and trajectory replanning for multi- UAV patrol. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 26 0 (2): 0 719--729

    2021

  39. [47]

    Optimal cruise, descent, and landing of evtol vehicles for urban air mobility using convex optimization

    Wang, Z., Wei, P., and Sun, L., 2021 b . Optimal cruise, descent, and landing of evtol vehicles for urban air mobility using convex optimization. In AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, page 0577

    2021

  40. [48]

    Urban low-altitude air transport management: Bridging dynamic traffic control and static network equilibrium

    Weng, C., Pan, T., Chen, C., and Zhong, R., 2025. Urban low-altitude air transport management: Bridging dynamic traffic control and static network equilibrium. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 178: 0 105237

    2025

  41. [49]

    H., and Hu, X., 2021

    Wu, Y., Low, K. H., and Hu, X., 2021. Trajectory-based flight scheduling for airmetro in urban environments by conflict resolution. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 131: 0 103355

    2021

  42. [50]

    A convex optimization approach to real-time merging control of evtol vehicles for future urban air mobility

    Wu, Y., Deniz, S., Shi, Y., and Wang, Z., 2022. A convex optimization approach to real-time merging control of evtol vehicles for future urban air mobility. In AIAA AVIATIoN 2022 forum, page 3319

    2022

  43. [51]

    Convex approach to real-time multiphase trajectory optimization for urban air mobility

    Wu, Y., Deniz, S., Shi, Y., and Wang, Z., 2025. Convex approach to real-time multiphase trajectory optimization for urban air mobility. Journal of Air Transportation, 33 0 (1): 0 69--85

    2025

  44. [52]

    Xinhua Daily Telegraph , Sept. 2024. How can `low altitude' be `economic'? [Online]. Available at: http://finance.people.com.cn/n1/2024/0913/c1004-40319544.html

    2024

  45. [53]

    A platoon-based hierarchical merging control for on-ramp vehicles under connected environment

    Xue, Y., Ding, C., Yu, B., and Wang, W., 2022. A platoon-based hierarchical merging control for on-ramp vehicles under connected environment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23 0 (11): 0 21821--21832

    2022

  46. [54]

    An integrated scheduling method for AGV routing in automated container terminals

    Yang, Y., Zhong, M., Dessouky, Y., and Postolache, O., 2018. An integrated scheduling method for AGV routing in automated container terminals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126: 0 482--493

    2018

  47. [55]

    and Fan, H., 2022

    Yue, L. and Fan, H., 2022. Dynamic scheduling and path planning of automated guided vehicles in automatic container terminal. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9 0 (11): 0 2005--2019

    2022

  48. [56]

    Collision-free trajectory planning for UAVs based on sequential convex programming

    Zhang, P., Mei, Y., Wang, H., Wang, W., and Liu, J., 2024. Collision-free trajectory planning for UAVs based on sequential convex programming. Aerospace Science and Technology, 152: 0 109404

    2024

  49. [57]

    H., Liu, Y., and Wang, Z., 2025

    Zhang, T., Yu, D., Cheong, K. H., Liu, Y., and Wang, Z., 2025. Hierarchical distributed strategy for autonomous UAV swarm formation aggregation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

    2025

  50. [58]

    Enhancing system-level safety in mixed-autonomy platoon via safe reinforcement learning

    Zhou, J., Yan, L., and Yang, K., 2024. Enhancing system-level safety in mixed-autonomy platoon via safe reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles

    2024

  51. [59]

    E., Bhaskar, A., and Chung, E., 2018

    Zhou, Y., Cholette, M. E., Bhaskar, A., and Chung, E., 2018. Optimal vehicle trajectory planning with control constraints and recursive implementation for automated on-ramp merging. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20 0 (9): 0 3409--3420

    2018

  52. [60]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  53. [61]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  54. [62]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  55. [63]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.