Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

R-4B: Incentivizing General-Purpose Auto-Thinking Capability in MLLMs via Bi-Mode Annealing and Reinforce Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.21113 v2 pith:VB2IORJG submitted 2025-08-28 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

R-4B: Incentivizing General-Purpose Auto-Thinking Capability in MLLMs via Bi-Mode Annealing and Reinforce Learning

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords thinkingmodelr-4bbi-modeperformanceachievesannealingauto-thinking
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) equipped with step-by-step thinking capabilities have demonstrated remarkable performance on complex reasoning problems. However, this thinking process is redundant for simple problems solvable without complex reasoning. To address this inefficiency, we propose R-4B, an auto-thinking MLLM, which can adaptively decide when to think based on problem complexity. The central idea of R-4B is to empower the model with both thinking and non-thinking capabilities using bi-mode annealing, and apply Bi-mode Policy Optimization (BPO) to improve the model's accuracy in determining whether to activate the thinking process. Specifically, we first train the model on a carefully curated dataset spanning various topics, which contains samples from both thinking and non-thinking modes. Then it undergoes a second phase of training under an improved GRPO framework, where the policy model is forced to generate responses from both modes for each input query. Experimental results show that R-4B achieves state-of-the-art performance across 25 challenging benchmarks. It outperforms Qwen2.5-VL-7B in most tasks and achieves performance comparable to larger models such as Kimi-VL-A3B-Thinking-2506 (16B) on reasoning-intensive benchmarks with lower computational cost.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OralAgent: Integrating Reasoning, Tools, and Knowledge for Interactive Dental Image Analysis

    cs.CL 2026-04 accept novelty 6.5

    OralAgent, a ReAct-style dental agent with 22 vision tools and a 134.8M-token textbook RAG corpus, reaches SOTA on MMOral-Uni, MMOral-OPG, and OralQA-ZH.

  2. Switch-Reasoner: Learn When to Think in Multitask Mixtures via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A GRPO framework that treats thinking as a tool call and uses dual-level regulation so multimodal models learn when to reason versus answer directly.

  3. ADaPT: Token-Level Decoupling for Efficient Large Reasoning Models

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ADaPT decouples efficiency and correctness signals at the token level via a mode-selection token, allowing a single model to control the efficiency-performance trade-off during inference.