Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Reverse-Engineered Reasoning for Open-Ended Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2509.06160 v1 pith:TTYGA6DN submitted 2025-09-07 cs.AI cs.CL

Reverse-Engineered Reasoning for Open-Ended Generation

classification cs.AI cs.CL
keywords reasoningdeepopen-endedapproachdistillationgenerationlikemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While the ``deep reasoning'' paradigm has spurred significant advances in verifiable domains like mathematics, its application to open-ended, creative generation remains a critical challenge. The two dominant methods for instilling reasoning -- reinforcement learning (RL) and instruction distillation -- falter in this area; RL struggles with the absence of clear reward signals and high-quality reward models, while distillation is prohibitively expensive and capped by the teacher model's capabilities. To overcome these limitations, we introduce REverse-Engineered Reasoning (REER), a new paradigm that fundamentally shifts the approach. Instead of building a reasoning process ``forwards'' through trial-and-error or imitation, REER works ``backwards'' from known-good solutions to computationally discover the latent, step-by-step deep reasoning process that could have produced them. Using this scalable, gradient-free approach, we curate and open-source DeepWriting-20K, a large-scale dataset of 20,000 deep reasoning trajectories for open-ended tasks. Our model, DeepWriter-8B, trained on this data, not only surpasses strong open-source baselines but also achieves performance competitive with, and at times superior to, leading proprietary models like GPT-4o and Claude 3.5.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Diagnosing and Repairing Persona Collapse in LLM Advice

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    LLMs collapse advice into a single supportive persona; Inverse-Process Distillation restores human-like persona diversity, yet raters still prefer the collapsed default.

  2. Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Looped language models with latent iterative computation and entropy-regularized depth allocation achieve performance matching up to 12B standard LLMs through superior knowledge manipulation.

  3. From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.5

    SFT supplies entangled compositional traces of atomic skills and routing modules; RL identifies those modules and enables recombination on novel compositions outside the SFT support.

  4. From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Introduces a hierarchical latent selection model showing SFT supplies raw module materials in compound traces while RL decomposes them to identify atomic modules and enable recombination for new reasoning configurations.

  5. IS-CoT: Breaking the Long-form Generation Collapse via Interleaved Structural Thinking

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    IS-CoT framework interleaves planning, writing, and reflection in LLMs to prevent length collapse, yielding IS-Writer-8B that outperforms larger models on long-form benchmarks with better length compliance.

  6. Bad Seeing or Bad Thinking? Rewarding Perception for Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new RL method called MoCA with Perception Verification rewards perceptual fidelity independently to improve both seeing and thinking in VLMs.

  7. OPERA: Aligning Open-Ended Reasoning via Objective Perplexity-based Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    OPERA uses perplexity dynamics as intrinsic rewards for RL alignment on open-ended tasks, synthesizes a 20k trajectory dataset via guiding words and log-prob rollouts, and sets new SOTA on Qwen3-8B matching some propr...

  8. Mind DeepResearch Technical Report

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MindDR combines a Planning Agent, DeepSearch Agent, and Report Agent with SFT cold-start, Search-RL, Report-RL, and preference alignment to reach competitive scores on research benchmarks using 30B-scale models.

  9. Taiji: Pareto Optimal Policy Optimization with Semantics-IDs Trade-off for Industrial LLM-Enhanced Recommendation

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Taiji presents a LLM-as-Enhancer system with reverse-engineered CoT data generation and Pareto Optimal Policy Optimization (POPO) to trade off semantic and ID rewards, deployed at Kuaishou serving 400M daily users.

  10. Bad Seeing or Bad Thinking? Rewarding Perception for Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes Modality-Aware Credit Assignment (MoCA) with blindfolded-reasoning proxy to reward perception fidelity separately from reasoning in VLMs.