Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This paper establishes that chain escape from a diblock copolymer micelle follows two competing routes, with the free-energy barrier scaling as core-block length to the 2/3 power on one route and linearly on the other.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 23:29 UTC pith:BKDWQLNC

load-bearing objection The dual-CV MD work is a real step forward, but the FFS linear scaling—the load-bearing evidence for the experimental claim—looks like it may be the same short-chain artifact they identify in their own MD inset. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.06528 v1 pith:BKDWQLNC submitted 2025-09-08 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Mechanisms of Chain Exchange in Diblock Copolymer Micelles

Samuel Varner , Marcus M\"uller , Alejandro Gallegos , Timothy P. Lodge , Kevin D. Dorfman , Zhen-Gang Wang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords diblock copolymer micelleschain exchangefree energy barrierenhanced samplingforward flux samplingHalperin-Alexander mechanismhyperstretchingcollective variables
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks why the barrier controlling how a diblock copolymer chain escapes from a micelle has appeared to scale differently in theory and experiment. It argues there is no single answer: under strong segregation and relatively dilute conditions, the minimum free energy path is the classic budding-like route in which the core block leaves as a compact globule, with a barrier scaling as N_core^(2/3); in a dense melt or dense corona, the same chain instead hyperstretches bead-by-bead across the interface, with a barrier scaling linearly with N_core. The two conclusions come from complementary simulations: two-dimensional enhanced-sampling molecular dynamics with a free-energy surface and string method for the first regime, and forward flux sampling of a single-chain mean-field model for the second. The linear scaling matches TR-SANS experiments, suggesting that experimental micelles sit in the stretched-chain regime, while the 2/3 scaling survives where the core can truly dry out.

Core claim

Using two collective variables (chain distance from the micelle and core-block end-to-end distance), the paper computes a 2D free energy surface with two nearly degenerate routes: a collapsed-globule path and an extended bead-by-bead path. The minimum free energy path follows the collapsed-globule (Halperin-Alexander) mechanism for N_core = 4–100, with barrier scaling N_core^(2/3). In the dense melt limit, forward flux sampling of a single chain leaving a planar interface in a static mean-field background gives a barrier linear in N_core, and reactive trajectories show an extended transition state. The escape mechanism is thus selected by whether the core block can collapse in the unfavorabl

What carries the argument

The central object is a two-dimensional free energy surface spanned by a distance collective variable (the selected chain's junction position or core-block center of mass relative to the micelle) and the core-block end-to-end distance, computed with spectral adaptive biasing force molecular dynamics; the string method converts that surface into a minimum free energy path. For the melt regime, the central object is a single bead-spring chain in a static mean-field background at a planar A/B interface, with a Hamiltonian that charges for unfavorable contacts and counts intramolecular contacts explicitly; forward flux sampling generates unbiased escape trajectories and rates from that model. Th

Load-bearing premise

The single-chain mean-field model—with a static background, fixed contact number z_c=50 and interaction ε=0.02, and Rouse-like Monte Carlo moves—must faithfully represent chain escape from a real micelle for the linear barrier and stretched transition state to transfer to TR-SANS conditions.

What would settle it

A TR-SANS experiment on monodisperse diblock micelles with a series of corona-block lengths (or solvent qualities) can measure the barrier exponent beta: if beta remains 2/3 even when the corona is dense enough to prevent core collapse, the paper's claim that experimental linear scaling implies a non-collapsed hyperstretched transition state would be contradicted. A complementary simulation check is to run the same forward flux sampling at much larger z_c or in a spherical geometry; if the linear N_core scaling disappears there, the planar mean-field result is an artifact.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If the MFEP is the right pathway under strong segregation, the Halperin-Alexander N_core^(2/3) barrier is real in that regime, and previous single-collective-variable simulations that saw N_core can be explained by hysteresis across the collapsed/extended ridge.
  • If the FFS model captures the dense-melt case, the linear barrier seen in TR-SANS means the escaping core block does not dry out in those experiments, favoring the hyperstretching mechanism over the collapsed-globule picture.
  • The crossover between mechanisms is governed by whether the core can collapse in the unfavorable medium, which in turn depends on core length, monomer coordination, corona density, and solvent penetration.
  • Accurate exchange rates in the strong-segregation regime require sampling chain conformation as an explicit collective variable, because the collapsed and extended states are nearly degenerate but separated by a significant ridge.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Implicit in the paper but not pursued: the near-degeneracy of the two pathways suggests exchange kinetics could be a two-channel process, so the apparent barrier exponent measured in experiments may shift with temperature, density, or polydispersity rather than being a single universal value.
  • A testable extension the paper does not perform: run the same forward flux sampling at different contact numbers z_c (or in a spherical micelle geometry) to map where the linear N_core scaling crosses over to N_core^(2/3).
  • The 2D free energy surface could support a committor analysis: measure from the ridge whether the collapsed and extended routes are dynamically distinct, which would determine whether a single reaction coordinate suffices for rate predictions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies single-chain exchange in diblock copolymer micelles using two complementary simulation approaches. In the first, coarse-grained MD with spectral adaptive biasing force is used to compute two-dimensional free energy surfaces for chain expulsion, with the end-to-end distance of the core block as an additional collective variable. The minimum free energy path computed from these surfaces qualitatively follows the Halperin–Alexander collapsed-chain mechanism, and the reported barrier scales as beta Delta F ~ N_core^(2/3). In the second, a single-chain model in a static mean-field background is combined with forward flux sampling to study escape in a dense melt; the barrier is reported to scale linearly with N_core, with an extended chain conformation at the transition state. The paper concludes that experimental conditions likely favor the hyperstretching mechanism over the Halperin–Alexander mechanism.

Significance. The dual-collective-variable strategy is a genuine advance over single-CV umbrella sampling: it resolves a bimodal conformational distribution and gives consistent results for two different distance-based CVs. The FFS reactive-ensemble analysis provides direct trajectory evidence for an extended transition state in the melt-like model, and the authors are commendably explicit about the limitations of the string method and mean-field assumptions. If the scaling claims are confirmed with proper uncertainty quantification and the short-chain range of the FFS model is addressed, the paper would be an important benchmark for chain-exchange mechanisms. The current manuscript, however, leaves two load-bearing points under-supported: the MD 2/3 exponent is not quantified, and the FFS linear scaling is demonstrated only in a chain-length window that overlaps the authors' own short-chain crossover.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.B, Fig. 7 and Fig. 5b inset] The FFS simulations use NA=6–18 with total N=32, which lies entirely within the short-chain window where the authors' own MD data show linear barrier scaling (Fig. 5b inset, 'linear regression of the first five points'). The linear scaling in Fig. 7 therefore does not distinguish the proposed melt effect (core block shrinks but does not collapse because of high Nbar) from the trivial short-chain crossover. The statement that 'the core block shrinks only slightly upon entering the B domain due to the high value of Nbar' is asserted, not demonstrated for the NA range studied. To support the conclusion that experimental conditions favor the hyperstretching mechanism, the FFS model must be tested at larger NA (e.g., by increasing total N) or the claims must be restricted to short cores.
  2. [Section II.B, Fig. 5b] The central quantitative claim that the MFEP barrier scales as N_core^(2/3) is based on a log-log regression with no error bars on the individual barriers, no confidence interval on the fitted exponent a, and no convergence or statistical uncertainty analysis for the 2D FES computed with SABF. Since the 2/3 exponent is the key evidence identifying the MFEP with the Halperin–Alexander mechanism, the fit must be quantified (e.g., bootstrap over independent FES calculations) and the fitted exponent reported with uncertainty. As written, 'the scaling is very near 2/3' cannot be independently evaluated.
  3. [Section III.A and Conclusion] The FFS model is explored at a single interaction contrast (epsilon=0.02, zc=50, chiN~64) and a single total chain length N=32, with NA varied only between 6 and 18. No variation of epsilon, zc, or total N is performed, so the robustness of the linear barrier scaling and the extended transition state to changes in segregation strength and chain length is unknown. This is especially important because the MD results show a crossover from linear to 2/3 scaling with increasing NA at fixed density; the FFS model may be operating on the short-chain side of that crossover, which would undermine the extrapolation to experimental TR-SANS conditions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II.B, MFEP limitations] The sentence 'is significantly longer than the chain relaxation time, or the time' appears incomplete or contains a typo; likely 'or the relaxation time' was intended.
  2. [Section III.B, Reactive Ensemble] The text 'The conditional probability distribution seems to feature a' is cut off; the following sentence begins 'To clarify this pathway...' without completing the observation.
  3. [Fig. 5b inset] The inset's 'linear regression of the first five points' should explicitly list the NA values included in that fit (presumably NA=4,6,8,10,12) so the overlap with the FFS range is transparent.
  4. [ESI, Free Energy Projections] The main text refers to 'a direct comparison of the barriers obtained from the two different methods in the ESI', but the provided ESI does not appear to contain such a comparison; please add it or adjust the reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the barrier scalings are measured simulation outputs compared with external theories.

full rationale

The paper's two central results are measured simulation observables, not quantities defined by the target scalings. In Sec. II, the 2D free energy surface is computed by SABF from a fully specified DPD model; the MFEP is obtained via the string method on that FES, and the barrier exponent is obtained by regression of beta Delta F_barr vs N_core (Fig. 5b). Nothing in the definitions of CV1/CV2, the SABF bias, or the string method contains the Halperin-Alexander 2/3 exponent. In Sec. III, the forward flux sampling rate k is measured from Metropolis MC of the single-chain Hamiltonian (Eqs. 11-13), and beta Delta F is defined via -ln(k/Phi0); the linear exponent is a fitted slope of the computed barriers (Fig. 7b), not an input parameter. The self-citations (Mueller ref. 30 for the model, Seeger refs. 56/57 as contrast) are not load-bearing: the model Hamiltonian is fully described in the paper, and the MD results actually disagree with Seeger's linear scaling rather than relying on it. The main caveat is external validity: the FFS model uses N=32 and N_core=6-18, which overlaps the short-chain linear regime the authors themselves identify in the MD inset (Fig. 5b), and the Conclusion acknowledges the simulations were restricted to a narrow range of parameters. That is a transferability/correctness limitation, not a circular reduction, because the linear scaling is still a computed output of a self-contained model rather than a restatement of the model's definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on model choices: DPD parameters, the selection of two collective variables, and the mean-field background for the single-chain model. The MD scaling claim also depends on the string-method MFEP being a valid kinetic proxy, which the authors themselves caution against.

free parameters (6)
  • MD scaling exponent a = ~2/3 (no CI reported)
    Regression ln(beta Delta F_barr) = a ln(N_A) + b on MFEP barriers, Fig. 5b; the value near 2/3 is the quantitative claim.
  • MD scaling prefactor b = not reported
    Intercept of the same regression, sets barrier magnitude.
  • FFS linear slope = not reported explicitly
    Linear fit of beta Delta F vs N_A in Fig. 7b and Fig. S5 yields the linear scaling claim.
  • Interaction contrast beta Delta epsilon = 23
    Chosen core-solvent/core-core repulsion difference; sets the strong segregation regime and barrier height.
  • Reduced density rho sigma^3 = 3.0
    Selects the HA (low density) regime; the ratio F_solv/F_HA ~ (N_A/rho sigma^3)^(1/3) depends on it.
  • FFS model parameters (epsilon, z_c, N) = 0.02, 50, 32
    Set chi N ~ 64 and sqrt(N_bar) ~ 67.5, representing a dense melt; the linear scaling depends on this regime.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption DPD conservative potential with epsilon_base = 25 kBT and epsilon_incompatible = 48 kBT adequately models strong segregation and chain expulsion (Eq. 3).
    All non-bonded interactions use this; no direct experimental calibration, but consistent with prior DPD micelle studies.
  • domain assumption Two collective variables (R_cm-jp/R_cm-cm and r_e2e) span the slow degrees of freedom of the escape process; no other slow variable affects the barrier.
    Needed for the 2D FES to be converged; if a third slow variable exists, the MFEP and barrier could be inaccurate.
  • domain assumption The single-chain model with static external fields and z_c = 50 represents a chain escaping from a dense micellar core; geometry is not important.
    Justifies using a planar interface and mean-field background in Section III; the paper argues the spherical geometry does not change the mechanism.
  • ad hoc to paper The string method MFEP on the 2D FES corresponds to the kinetic pathway despite neglected thermal fluctuations and dynamics.
    The authors explicitly caveat this in Section II.B; for a FES with two nearly degenerate valleys, the MFEP may not be the reactive path.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mechanisms of Chain Exchange in Diblock Copolymer Micelles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BKDWQLNC

@misc{pith2026250906528,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mechanisms of Chain Exchange in Diblock Copolymer Micelles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BKDWQLNC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06528}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We investigate the mechanism of chain exchange in diblock copolymer micelles using two distinct yet complementary simulation techniques. First, enhanced sampling method is combined with coarse-grained molecular dynamics to compute a two-dimensional free energy surface for the chain expulsion process in the strong segregation regime. To facilitate chain expulsion, a distance-based collective variable is biased, and the end-to-end distance of the core block is also biased to ensure sufficient sampling of chain conformations. The free energy surface reveals a bimodal distribution of chain conformations along the effective reaction coordinate. The minimum free energy pathway qualitatively aligns with the Halperin-Alexander budding-like mechanism. The free energy barrier along this pathway is calculated for core block lengths ranging from $N_\textrm{core}=4$-$100$, and the barrier is shown to scale as $\beta\Delta F_\textrm{barr} \sim N_\textrm{core}^{2/3}$, consistent with the Halperin-Alexander prediction for a globular transition state. Notably, the free energy surface also reveals a nearly degenerate alternative pathway in which the chain escapes by extending out bead-by-bead, in agreement with previous simulations. We also study the case of a dense copolymer melt, where the core-block shrinks but does not collapse into a dry compact globule in the opposite phase. To examine the kinetic pathway, a simplified model is introduced in which a single chain escapes from a planar interface within a mean-field background. Forward flux sampling calculations yield a linear scaling of the barrier, $\beta\Delta F_\textrm{barr} \sim N_\textrm{core}$, in agreement with experimental observations and prior simulations. Moreover, analysis of successful escape trajectories highlights an extended chain conformation at the transition state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06528 by Alejandro Gallegos, Kevin D. Dorfman, Marcus M\"uller, Samuel Varner, Timothy P. Lodge, Zhen-Gang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Example of a stable micelle with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. 2-dimensional FES for CV pairs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Conditional probability distribution for the core block end [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The MFEP plotted along a single dimension, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) 1-dimensional free energy profile of the MFEP for various core block lengths, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. A visual representation of the MC simulation setup. The two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the free energy profiles and scaling behavior for the xjp CV. A complementary plot is provided for the xcmA CV in the ESI† . The scaling of the free energy barrier with core-block length appears to be linear, regardless of the choice of gen￾erating CV. The inset of Figure 7b also shows that the rate computed from Equation (15) decays exponentially with NA. This is the expected scaling for the case wh… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Results from the reactive ensemble for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Single Chain Expulsion from Diblock Copolymer Micelles with Dense Corona

    cond-mat.soft 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SCFT calculations show linear scaling of single-chain expulsion barrier with hydrophobic block length and solvent selectivity, with all minimum-energy paths converging to a nearly degenerate channel.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    E , author W

    author author W. E , author W. Ren , \ and\ author E. Vanden-Eijnden ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.052301 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 66 ,\ pages 052301 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.052301 2002

  2. [2]

    E , author W

    author author W. E , author W. Ren , \ and\ author E. Vanden-Eijnden ,\ 10.1063/1.2720838 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 126 ,\ pages 164103 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.2720838 2007

  3. [3]

    E \ and\ author E

    author author W. E \ and\ author E. Vanden-Eijnden ,\ 10.1146/annurev.physchem.040808.090412 journal journal Annual Review of Physical Chemistry \ volume 61 ,\ pages 391 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    author author R. J. \ Allen , author D. Frenkel , \ and\ author P. R. \ ten Wolde ,\ 10.1063/1.2198827 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 124 ,\ pages 194111 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.2198827 2006

  5. [5]

    author author E. E. \ Borrero \ and\ author F. A. \ Escobedo ,\ 10.1063/1.2776270 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 127 ,\ pages 164101 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2776270 2007

  6. [6]

    Hussain \ and\ author A

    author author S. Hussain \ and\ author A. Haji-Akbari ,\ 10.1063/1.5127780 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 152 ,\ pages 060901 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5127780 2020

  7. [7]

    author author M. E. \ O'Neill ,\ @noop title PCG: A Family of Simple Fast Space-Efficient Statistically Good Algorithms for Random Number Generation ,\ type Tech. Rep. \ number HMC-CS-2014-0905 \ ( institution Harvey Mudd College ,\ address Claremont, CA ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  8. [8]

    author author E. B. \ Zhulina , author M. Adam , author I. LaRue , author S. S. \ Sheiko , \ and\ author M. Rubinstein ,\ 10.1021/ma048102n journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 38 ,\ pages 5330 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma048102n 2005

  9. [9]

    Cotanda , author A

    author author P. Cotanda , author A. Lu , author J. P. \ Patterson , author N. Petzetakis , \ and\ author R. K. \ O’Reilly ,\ 10.1021/ma2027462 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 45 ,\ pages 2377 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma2027462 2012

  10. [10]

    Khullar , author V

    author author P. Khullar , author V. Singh , author A. Mahal , author H. Kumar , author G. Kaur , \ and\ author M. S. \ Bakshi ,\ 10.1021/jp310507m journal journal J. Phys. Chem. B \ volume 117 ,\ pages 3028 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/jp310507m 2013

  11. [11]

    Boontongkong \ and\ author R

    author author Y. Boontongkong \ and\ author R. E. \ Cohen ,\ 10.1021/ma0117357 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 35 ,\ pages 3647 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma0117357 2002

  12. [12]

    author author M. S. \ Bakshi ,\ 10.1016/j.cis.2014.08.001 journal journal Advances in Colloid and Interface Science \ volume 213 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cis.2014.08.001 2014

  13. [13]

    Kazunori , author K

    author author K. Kazunori , author K. Glenn S. , author Y. Masayuki , author O. Teruo , \ and\ author S. Yasuhisa ,\ 10.1016/0168-3659(93)90172-2 journal journal Journal of Controlled Release \ series Special Issue Proceedings of the Second European Symposium on Controlled Drug Delivery ,\ volume 24 ,\ pages 119 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-3659(93)90172-2 1993

  14. [14]

    Luo , author J

    author author L. Luo , author J. Tam , author D. Maysinger , \ and\ author A. Eisenberg ,\ 10.1021/bc025524y journal journal Bioconjugate Chem. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 1259 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/bc025524y 2002

  15. [15]

    Kim , author S

    author author S. Kim , author S. , Yunzhou , author K. , Ji Young , author P. , Kinam , , \ and\ author J.-X. \ Cheng ,\ 10.1517/17425240903380446 journal journal Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery \ volume 7 ,\ pages 49 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1517/17425240903380446 2010

  16. [16]

    Kataoka , author A

    author author K. Kataoka , author A. Harada , \ and\ author Y. Nagasaki ,\ 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.013 journal journal Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews \ series MOST CITED PAPERS IN THE HISTORY OF ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS : A TRIBUTE TO THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE JOURNAL ,\ volume 64 ,\ pages 37 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.013 2012

  17. [17]

    Gaucher , author M.-H

    author author G. Gaucher , author M.-H. \ Dufresne , author V. P. \ Sant , author N. Kang , author D. Maysinger , \ and\ author J.-C. \ Leroux ,\ 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.034 journal journal Journal of Controlled Release \ series Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium on Recent Advances in Drug Delivery Systems ,\ volume 109 ,\ pages 169 ( ye...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.034 2005

  18. [18]

    author author D. A. \ Chiappetta \ and\ author A. Sosnik ,\ 10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.03.022 journal journal European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics \ volume 66 ,\ pages 303 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2007.03.022 2007

  19. [19]

    Förster \ and\ author M

    author author S. Förster \ and\ author M. Antonietti ,\ 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199802)10:3<195::AID-ADMA195>3.0.CO;2-V journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 10 ,\ pages 195 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-4095(199802)10:3 1998

  20. [20]

    Lohmüller , author D

    author author T. Lohmüller , author D. Aydin , author M. Schwieder , author C. Morhard , author I. Louban , author C. Pacholski , \ and\ author J. P. \ Spatz ,\ 10.1116/1.3536839 journal journal Biointerphases \ volume 6 ,\ pages MR1 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1116/1.3536839 2011

  21. [21]

    author author E. A. G. \ Aniansson \ and\ author S. N. \ Wall ,\ 10.1021/j100603a016 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. \ volume 78 ,\ pages 1024 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/j100603a016 1974

  22. [22]

    author author E. A. G. \ Aniansson \ and\ author S. N. \ Wall ,\ 10.1021/j100575a019 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 857 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/j100575a019 1975

  23. [23]

    author author E. A. G. \ Aniansson , author S. N. \ Wall , author M. Almgren , author H. Hoffmann , author I. Kielmann , author W. Ulbricht , author R. Zana , author J. Lang , \ and\ author C. Tondre ,\ 10.1021/j100550a001 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. \ volume 80 ,\ pages 905 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/j100550a001 1976

  24. [24]

    editor R. Zana ,\ ed.,\ @noop title Dynamics of Surfactant Self - Assemblies : Micelles , Microemulsions , Vesicles and Lyotropic Phases \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ address Boca Raton ,\ year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  25. [25]

    Goldmints , author J

    author author I. Goldmints , author J. F. \ Holzwarth , author K. A. \ Smith , \ and\ author T. A. \ Hatton ,\ 10.1021/la970534m journal journal Langmuir \ volume 13 ,\ pages 6130 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/la970534m 1997

  26. [26]

    author author E. E. \ Dormidontova ,\ 10.1021/ma9809029 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 32 ,\ pages 7630 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma9809029 1999

  27. [27]

    author author A. N. \ Semenov \ and\ author M. Rubinstein ,\ 10.1021/ma0117965 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 35 ,\ pages 4821 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma0117965 2002

  28. [28]

    author author T. P. \ Lodge , author C. L. \ Seitzinger , author S. C. \ Seeger , author S. Yang , author S. Gupta , \ and\ author K. D. \ Dorfman ,\ 10.1021/acspolymersau.2c00033 journal journal ACS Polym. Au \ volume 2 ,\ pages 397 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acspolymersau.2c00033 2022

  29. [29]

    Halperin \ and\ author S

    author author A. Halperin \ and\ author S. Alexander ,\ 10.1021/ma00195a069 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 22 ,\ pages 2403 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma00195a069 1989

  30. [30]

    Halperin ,\ 10.1021/ma200811x journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 44 ,\ pages 5072 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    author author A. Halperin ,\ 10.1021/ma200811x journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 44 ,\ pages 5072 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma200811x 2011

  31. [31]

    author author I. A. \ Nyrkova \ and\ author A. N. \ Semenov ,\ 10.1002/mats.200500010 journal journal Macromolecular Theory and Simulations \ volume 14 ,\ pages 569 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/mats.200500010 2005

  32. [32]

    Cao , author P

    author author T. Cao , author P. Munk , author C. Ramireddy , author Z. Tuzar , \ and\ author S. E. \ Webber ,\ 10.1021/ma00023a036 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 24 ,\ pages 6300 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma00023a036 1991

  33. [33]

    Creutz , author J

    author author S. Creutz , author J. van Stam , author S. Antoun , author F. C. \ De Schryver , \ and\ author R. Jérôme ,\ 10.1021/ma961922i journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 30 ,\ pages 4078 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma961922i 1997

  34. [34]

    Creutz , author J

    author author S. Creutz , author J. van Stam , author F. C. \ De Schryver , \ and\ author R. Jérôme ,\ 10.1021/ma970987y journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 31 ,\ pages 681 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma970987y 1998

  35. [35]

    M u \" u ller ,\ 10.1021/ma9807973 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 31 ,\ pages 9044 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    author author M. M u \" u ller ,\ 10.1021/ma9807973 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 31 ,\ pages 9044 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma9807973 1998

  36. [36]

    Helfand \ and\ author Y

    author author E. Helfand \ and\ author Y. Tagami ,\ 10.1063/1.1677735 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 56 ,\ pages 3592 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1677735 1972

  37. [37]

    Müller ,\ 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00781 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 54 ,\ pages 6296 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    author author M. Müller ,\ 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00781 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 54 ,\ pages 6296 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00781 2021

  38. [38]

    Prochazka , author B

    author author K. Prochazka , author B. Bednar , author E. Mukhtar , author P. Svoboda , author J. Trnena , \ and\ author M. Almgren ,\ 10.1021/j100164a069 journal journal J. Phys. Chem. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 4563 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/j100164a069 1991

  39. [39]

    Wang , author C

    author author Y. Wang , author C. M. \ Kausch , author M. Chun , author R. P. \ Quirk , \ and\ author W. L. \ Mattice ,\ 10.1021/ma00108a016 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 28 ,\ pages 904 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma00108a016 1995

  40. [40]

    author author C. K. \ Smith \ and\ author G. Liu ,\ 10.1021/ma951338u journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 29 ,\ pages 2060 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma951338u 2060

  41. [41]

    author author R. S. \ Underhill , author J. Ding , author V. I. \ Birss , \ and\ author G. Liu ,\ 10.1021/ma9710545 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 30 ,\ pages 8298 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma9710545 1997

  42. [42]

    Rager , author W

    author author T. Rager , author W. H. \ Meyer , \ and\ author G. Wegner ,\ 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3935(19990701)200:7<1672::AID-MACP1672>3.0.CO;2-V journal journal Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics \ volume 200 ,\ pages 1672 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-3935(19990701)200:7 1999

  43. [43]

    van Stam , author S

    author author J. van Stam , author S. Creutz , author F. C. \ De Schryver , \ and\ author R. Jérôme ,\ 10.1021/ma992174a journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 33 ,\ pages 6388 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma992174a 2000

  44. [44]

    Willner , author A

    author author L. Willner , author A. Poppe , author J. Allgaier , author M. Monkenbusch , \ and\ author D. Richter ,\ 10.1209/epl/i2001-00467-y journal journal EPL \ volume 55 ,\ pages 667 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1209/epl/i2001-00467-y 2001

  45. [45]

    \ Won , author H

    author author Y.-Y. \ Won , author H. T. \ Davis , \ and\ author F. S. \ Bates ,\ 10.1021/ma021439+ journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 36 ,\ pages 953 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma021439 2003

  46. [46]

    Lu , author F

    author author J. Lu , author F. S. \ Bates , \ and\ author T. P. \ Lodge ,\ 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00294 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 48 ,\ pages 2667 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00294 2015

  47. [47]

    Lund , author L

    author author R. Lund , author L. Willner , author J. Stellbrink , author P. Lindner , \ and\ author D. Richter ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.068302 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 96 ,\ pages 068302 ( year 2006 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.068302 2006

  48. [48]

    Lund , author L

    author author R. Lund , author L. Willner , author D. Richter , \ and\ author E. E. \ Dormidontova ,\ 10.1021/ma060328y journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 39 ,\ pages 4566 ( year 2006 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma060328y 2006

  49. [49]

    Lund , author L

    author author R. Lund , author L. Willner , author D. Richter , author H. Iatrou , author N. Hadjichristidis , \ and\ author P. Lindner ,\ 10.1107/S0021889807005201 journal journal J Appl Cryst \ volume 40 ,\ pages s327 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1107/s0021889807005201 2007

  50. [50]

    \ Choi , author T

    author author S.-H. \ Choi , author T. P. \ Lodge , \ and\ author F. S. \ Bates ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.047802 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 104 ,\ pages 047802 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.047802 2010

  51. [51]

    Zinn , author L

    author author T. Zinn , author L. Willner , author R. Lund , author V. Pipich , \ and\ author D. Richter ,\ 10.1039/C1SM06809A journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 8 ,\ pages 623 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/c1sm06809a 2011

  52. [52]

    Lu , author S

    author author J. Lu , author S. Choi , author F. S. \ Bates , \ and\ author T. P. \ Lodge ,\ 10.1021/mz300285x journal journal ACS Macro Lett. \ volume 1 ,\ pages 982 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/mz300285x 2012

  53. [53]

    Lund , author L

    author author R. Lund , author L. Willner , author V. Pipich , author I. Grillo , author P. Lindner , author J. Colmenero , \ and\ author D. Richter ,\ 10.1021/ma200532r journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 44 ,\ pages 6145 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma200532r 2011

  54. [54]

    Ma \ and\ author T

    author author Y. Ma \ and\ author T. P. \ Lodge ,\ 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02212 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 49 ,\ pages 9542 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02212 2016

  55. [55]

    author author K. A. \ Cavicchi \ and\ author T. P. \ Lodge ,\ 10.1021/ma0346815 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 36 ,\ pages 7158 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma0346815 2003

  56. [56]

    Yokoyama \ and\ author E

    author author H. Yokoyama \ and\ author E. J. \ Kramer ,\ 10.1021/ma9805250 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 31 ,\ pages 7871 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma9805250 1998

  57. [57]

    Yokoyama \ and\ author E

    author author H. Yokoyama \ and\ author E. J. \ Kramer ,\ 10.1021/ma991202m journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 33 ,\ pages 954 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma991202m 2000

  58. [58]

    Li \ and\ author E

    author author Z. Li \ and\ author E. E. \ Dormidontova ,\ 10.1021/ma902860j journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 43 ,\ pages 3521 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma902860j 2010

  59. [59]

    Li \ and\ author E

    author author Z. Li \ and\ author E. E. \ Dormidontova ,\ 10.1039/C0SM01443E journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 7 ,\ pages 4179 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/c0sm01443e 2011

  60. [60]

    Prhashanna , author S

    author author A. Prhashanna , author S. A. \ Khan , \ and\ author S. B. \ Chen ,\ 10.1002/mats.201600016 journal journal Macromolecular Theory and Simulations \ volume 25 ,\ pages 383 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/mats.201600016 2016

  61. [61]

    Prhashanna \ and\ author S

    author author A. Prhashanna \ and\ author S. B. \ Chen ,\ 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.04.049 journal journal Polymer \ volume 118 ,\ pages 22 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2017.04.049 2017

  62. [62]

    Prhashanna \ and\ author E

    author author A. Prhashanna \ and\ author E. E. \ Dormidontova ,\ 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02398 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 53 ,\ pages 982 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.9b02398 2020

  63. [63]

    author author S. C. \ Seeger , author K. D. \ Dorfman , \ and\ author T. P. \ Lodge ,\ 10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00508 journal journal ACS Macro Lett. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1570 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00508 2021

  64. [64]

    author author S. C. \ Seeger , author T. P. \ Lodge , \ and\ author K. D. \ Dorfman ,\ 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01742 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 55 ,\ pages 10220 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01742 2022

  65. [65]

    Yuan , author S

    author author F. Yuan , author S. Wang , \ and\ author R. G. \ Larson ,\ 10.1021/la5044393 journal journal Langmuir \ volume 31 ,\ pages 1336 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/la5044393 2015

  66. [66]

    Wen , author B

    author author B. Wen , author B. Bai , \ and\ author R. G. \ Larson ,\ 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.138 journal journal Journal of Colloid and Interface Science \ volume 599 ,\ pages 773 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.138 2021

  67. [67]

    Barducci , author M

    author author A. Barducci , author M. Bonomi , \ and\ author M. Parrinello ,\ 10.1002/wcms.31 journal journal WIREs Computational Molecular Science \ volume 1 ,\ pages 826 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1002/wcms.31 2011

  68. [68]

    author author T. S. \ van Erp , author D. Moroni , \ and\ author P. G. \ Bolhuis ,\ 10.1063/1.1562614 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 118 ,\ pages 7762 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.1562614 2003

  69. [69]

    author author R. D. \ Groot \ and\ author P. B. \ Warren ,\ 10.1063/1.474784 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 107 ,\ pages 4423 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.474784 1997

  70. [70]

    author author J. A. \ Mysona , author A. V. \ McCormick , \ and\ author D. C. \ Morse ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.012602 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 100 ,\ pages 012602 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.100.012602 2019

  71. [71]

    Eastman , author R

    author author P. Eastman , author R. Galvelis , author R. P. \ Peláez , author C. R. A. \ Abreu , author S. E. \ Farr , author E. Gallicchio , author A. Gorenko , author M. M. \ Henry , author F. Hu , author J. Huang , author A. Krämer , author J. Michel , author J. A. \ Mitchell , author V. S. \ Pande , author J. P. \ Rodrigues , author J. Rodriguez-Guer...

    2023

  72. [72]

    author author B. B. \ Ye , author P. J. \ Walker , \ and\ author Z.-G. \ Wang ,\ 10.21105/joss.07013 journal journal JOSS \ volume 9 ,\ pages 7013 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.07013 2024

  73. [73]

    author author P. F. \ Zubieta Rico , author L. Schneider , author G. R. \ Pérez-Lemus , author R. Alessandri , author S. Dasetty , author T. D. \ Nguyen , author C. A. \ Menéndez , author Y. Wu , author Y. Jin , author Y. Xu , author S. Varner , author J. A. \ Parker , author A. L. \ Ferguson , author J. K. \ Whitmer , \ and\ author J. J. \ de Pablo ,\ 10...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01189-z 2024

  74. [74]

    author author P. F. \ Zubieta Rico , author G. R. \ Pérez-Lemus , \ and\ author J. J. \ de Pablo ,\ 10.1063/5.0221263 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 162 ,\ pages 084109 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0221263 2025

  75. [75]

    McGovern \ and\ author J

    author author M. McGovern \ and\ author J. de Pablo ,\ 10.1063/1.4818153 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 139 ,\ pages 084102 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4818153 2013

  76. [76]

    Helfand ,\ 10.1021/ma00027a078 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 25 ,\ pages 492 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    author author E. Helfand ,\ 10.1021/ma00027a078 journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 25 ,\ pages 492 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma00027a078 1992

  77. [77]

    Müller ,\ 10.1007/s10955-011-0302-z journal journal J Stat Phys \ volume 145 ,\ pages 967 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    author author M. Müller ,\ 10.1007/s10955-011-0302-z journal journal J Stat Phys \ volume 145 ,\ pages 967 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/s10955-011-0302-z 2011

  78. [78]

    author author K. C. \ Daoulas \ and\ author M. Müller ,\ 10.1063/1.2364506 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 125 ,\ pages 184904 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2364506 2006

  79. [79]

    Schneider \ and\ author M

    author author L. Schneider \ and\ author M. Müller ,\ 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.08.011 journal journal Computer Physics Communications \ volume 235 ,\ pages 463 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.08.011 2018

  80. [80]

    \ Choi , author F

    author author S.-H. \ Choi , author F. S. \ Bates , \ and\ author T. P. \ Lodge ,\ 10.1021/ma102788v journal journal Macromolecules \ volume 44 ,\ pages 3594 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ma102788v 2011

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.