pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.00377 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-01 · 🌀 gr-qc · physics.pop-ph

Redshifted civilizations, galactic empires, and the Fermi paradox

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 11:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc physics.pop-ph
keywords Fermi paradoxtime dilationsupermassive black holesinterstellar travelgalactic civilizationsdark forest hypothesisSgr A*general relativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Type II civilization can span the entire Milky Way using extreme time dilation near the central black hole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines ways for a civilization to overcome interstellar distances and light-speed limits by shifting into a highly time-dilated reference frame near Sagittarius A*, the Milky Way's central supermassive black hole. Using only classical general relativity and no new physics, it demonstrates that stable orbits close to the photon sphere allow time dilation factors around 10,000 while keeping acceleration levels biologically safe and energy use below Type II scales. This setup would let members of the civilization travel across the galaxy's diameter and return in what feels like a normal human lifetime to them, even as vast amounts of external time pass. The authors note that such orbits would produce signals with a steady downward frequency drift and that the speed of building such empires raises the stakes for conflicts with other civilizations.

Core claim

A single Type II civilization can establish a galaxy-spanning civilization with a time dilation factor of 10^4, enabling trips spanning the diameter of the Milky Way within a human lifetime in the civilizational reference frame. Biologically tolerable acceleration levels suffice to reach and maintain stable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* without requiring novel physics or exceeding Type II energy scales. Isotropic, monochromatic signals from orbits near the photon radius of a black hole exhibit a downward frequency drift. The vulnerability of ultrarelativistic vessels to destruction, combined with the relatively short timescales on which adversarial civilizations can arise, provides

What carries the argument

Stable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A*, which produce strong gravitational time dilation while remaining reachable with modest accelerations and energy budgets.

If this is right

  • One advanced civilization could connect distant star systems into a single empire on timescales short enough to outpace the rise of competitors.
  • Signals sent from these orbits would display a continuous downward frequency drift detectable by outside observers.
  • Ultrarrelativistic travel becomes feasible but also more dangerous because other civilizations can develop and attack on short external timescales.
  • The setup supplies a concrete mechanism supporting the dark forest hypothesis as a resolution to the Fermi paradox.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Civilizations using these orbits might remain effectively invisible to distant searches because their signals are both redshifted and confined to small angular regions around galactic centers.
  • Similar time-dilated empires could form in other galaxies around their own central black holes, leading to a hidden population of advanced societies.
  • Searches for downward-drifting monochromatic signals from galactic centers could serve as a direct test for the presence of such orbiting civilizations.

Load-bearing premise

That biologically tolerable acceleration levels suffice to reach and maintain stable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* without requiring novel physics or exceeding Type II energy scales.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation showing that the acceleration needed to enter and hold a stable orbit at the photon radius of Sgr A* exceeds biologically safe levels or requires energy far above Type II civilization output.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.00377 by Chris Reiss, Justin C. Feng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spacetime diagram illustrating the so called “twin paradox” in one [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time dilation factor Γ for an unstable circular orbit (near the photon radius) versus mass for a tidal acceleration atidal = 1 m/s 2 across a distance of χ ∼ 2 m. which necessarily have finite extent, irrespective of their com￾position; sufficiently large tidal forces can potentially disas￾semble biological organisms above a characteristic size (which must be finite). The magnitude of tidal forces over a d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Frequency ratio νo/νs versus angular position of a distant observer ϕo, given a source in a circular orbit with time dilation factor Γ = 104 with l > 0 emitting a signal isotropically with frequency νo. Since l > 0, the source moves in the positive ϕ direction. As the source moves, the curve shifts to the right; an observer at a fixed angular position will see νo/νs decrease as the source continues to move… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An illustration of a civilization based around a network of lin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plots of distance and proper time required to accelerate a vessel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of a ring of black holes concentric with the center of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Logarithmic plot of Eq. (28) for the peak power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Given the vast distances between stars in the Milky Way and the long timescales required for interstellar travel, we consider how a civilization might overcome the constraints arising from finite lifespans and the speed of light without invoking exotic or novel physics. We consider several scenarios in which a civilization can migrate to a time-dilated frame within the scope of classical general relativity and without incurring a biologically intolerable level of acceleration. Remarkably, the power requirements are lower than one might expect; biologically tolerable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* can be maintained by a civilization well below the Type II threshold, and a single Type II civilization can establish a galaxy-spanning civilization with a time dilation factor of $10^4$, enabling trips spanning the diameter of the Milky Way within a human lifetime in the civilizational reference frame. We also find that isotropic, monochromatic signals from orbits near the photon radius of a black hole exhibit a downward frequency drift. The vulnerability of ultrarelativistic vessels to destruction, combined with the relatively short timescales on which adversarial civilizations can arise, provides a strong motivating element for the ``dark forest'' hypothesis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that advanced civilizations can exploit gravitational time dilation near the photon sphere of Sgr A* to achieve effective interstellar travel on human timescales in their proper frame. It claims that a time-dilation factor of 10^4 is attainable with biologically tolerable proper accelerations, that the required power lies well below the Type II threshold, and that a single such civilization could therefore establish a galaxy-spanning empire; the work further notes a downward frequency drift in isotropic signals from such orbits and invokes these considerations to motivate the dark-forest hypothesis as a resolution of the Fermi paradox.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the paper supplies a concrete, parameter-light GR mechanism that converts the usual light-speed barrier into a manageable engineering problem for a Type II civilization. The low power estimate and the explicit link to observable signal drift are potentially falsifiable predictions that could be checked with future radio or gravitational-wave observations; the work therefore adds a new, non-exotic channel to discussions of the Fermi paradox and SETI strategy.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / main text] Abstract and main text: the central assertion that 'biologically tolerable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* can be maintained by a civilization well below the Type II threshold' is stated without an explicit derivation of the required proper acceleration, thrust, or radiated power. The manuscript should supply the orbit radius corresponding to a dilation factor of 10^4, the Lyapunov exponent of the unstable circular orbit, and the corrective acceleration needed to hold a finite radial deviation (e.g., 10 m), together with the resulting power for a photon-drive habitat of stated mass.
  2. [Main text] The claim that 'trips spanning the diameter of the Milky Way' become feasible within a human lifetime in the civilizational frame rests on the 10^4 dilation factor; the paper should state the corresponding proper time for a 100 kpc round-trip and confirm that the acceleration budget remains biologically acceptable throughout the boost and coast phases.
minor comments (1)
  1. The frequency-drift prediction for isotropic, monochromatic signals is interesting but would be clearer if accompanied by a short analytic expression or numerical example showing the expected d f / d t.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments correctly identify places where additional quantitative detail would improve clarity and rigor. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit derivations and calculations addressing both major points, as detailed below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / main text] Abstract and main text: the central assertion that 'biologically tolerable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* can be maintained by a civilization well below the Type II threshold' is stated without an explicit derivation of the required proper acceleration, thrust, or radiated power. The manuscript should supply the orbit radius corresponding to a dilation factor of 10^4, the Lyapunov exponent of the unstable circular orbit, and the corrective acceleration needed to hold a finite radial deviation (e.g., 10 m), together with the resulting power for a photon-drive habitat of stated mass.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that supplies the orbit radius r for a dilation factor of 10^4 (r = 1.5 r_s (1 + O(10^{-8}))), the Lyapunov exponent of the unstable circular orbit, the corrective proper acceleration required to hold a 10 m radial deviation, and the resulting radiated power for a photon-drive habitat of stated mass. These quantities confirm that the power remains well below the Type II threshold. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main text] The claim that 'trips spanning the diameter of the Milky Way' become feasible within a human lifetime in the civilizational frame rests on the 10^4 dilation factor; the paper should state the corresponding proper time for a 100 kpc round-trip and confirm that the acceleration budget remains biologically acceptable throughout the boost and coast phases.

    Authors: We agree that stating the proper time explicitly is useful. In the revised manuscript we now include the calculation: the coordinate time for a 100 kpc round-trip at c is approximately 3.26 × 10^5 years, corresponding to a proper time of roughly 33 years under a 10^4 dilation factor. We also confirm that the proper acceleration remains biologically tolerable (below 1 g) during boost phases via gradual profiles and is negligible during coast; the separate orbit-maintenance acceleration is treated in the new derivation subsection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper derives its central claims from the standard Schwarzschild metric time-dilation formula for circular orbits, sqrt(1 - 3M/r), applied to orbits near the photon sphere of Sgr A*, together with Kardashev scale energy budgets and Newtonian estimates for proper acceleration and thrust. These inputs are external to the paper, with no parameters fitted to data within the manuscript, no self-citations invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatzes smuggled in via prior work. The time-dilation factor of 10^4 and the power requirements below Type II thresholds follow directly from the metric and energy scaling without reduction to the paper's own outputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the applicability of classical GR near photon spheres, the definition of Type II energy output, and the assumption that civilizations can establish and sustain the required orbits. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • time dilation factor = 10^4
    Illustrative value of 10^4 chosen to enable Milky Way diameter traversal in a human lifetime.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Classical general relativity accurately describes spacetime near the photon sphere of supermassive black holes.
    Paper invokes GR time dilation without modifications or quantum corrections.
  • domain assumption A civilization can reach and maintain stable orbits at the required radius with biologically tolerable acceleration.
    Stated as feasible in the abstract without detailed trajectory or tidal-force analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1381 out tokens · 62913 ms · 2026-05-18T11:23:52.097345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 136 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Tsiolkovsky, The future of earth and mankind, in: B

    K. Tsiolkovsky, The future of earth and mankind, in: B. Groys (Ed.), Russian cosmism, MIT Press, 2018, pp. 113–131

  2. [2]

    R. H. Goddard, The ultimate migration, Journal of the British Interplan- etary Society 36 (1983) 552

  3. [3]

    Cassidy, P

    J. Cassidy, P. Shaver, Handbook of Attachment, Third Edition: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, Guilford Publications, 2016

  4. [4]

    The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity

    M. Alcubierre, The Warp drive: Hyperfast travel within general relativ- ity, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) L73–L77.arXiv:gr-qc/0009013, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001

  5. [5]

    Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: from Einstein to Hawking, AIP Press, 1995

    M. Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: from Einstein to Hawking, AIP Press, 1995

  6. [6]

    Van Den Broeck, A ’Warp drive’ with reasonable total energy re- quirements, Class

    C. Van Den Broeck, A ’Warp drive’ with reasonable total energy re- quirements, Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 3973–3979.arXiv:gr-qc/ 9905084,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/314

  7. [7]

    F. S. N. Lobo (Ed.), Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions, V ol. 189 of Fundamental Theories of Physics, Springer, 2017.arXiv: 2103.05610,doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55182-1

  8. [8]

    D. H. Coule, No warp drive, Classical and Quantum Gravity 15 (8) (1998) 2523.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/8/026. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/8/026

  9. [9]

    C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Ex- periment, Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 4.arXiv:1403.7377,doi: 10.12942/lrr-2014-4

  10. [10]

    Gravitational Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar Timing Arrays

    N. Yunes, X. Siemens, Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar Timing-Arrays, Living Rev. Rel. 28 (2025) 3.arXiv:1304.3473,doi:https://doi.org/10. 1007/s41114-024-00054-9

  11. [11]

    C. Sagan, Direct contact among galactic civilizations by relativistic interstellar spaceflight, Planetary and Space Science 11 (5) (1963) 485– 498.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(63)90072-2. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0032063363900722 15

  12. [12]

    E. F. Taylor, J. A. Wheeler, Spacetime physics, Macmillan, 1992. URLhttps://www.eftaylor.com/spacetimephysics/

  13. [13]

    Reiss, Falling forward : The fermi paradox, supermassive black holes, and the likely flight of extraterrestrial intelligence toward extreme time dilation

    C. Reiss, Falling forward : The fermi paradox, supermassive black holes, and the likely flight of extraterrestrial intelligence toward extreme time dilation. (Feb 2020).doi:10.31219/osf.io/me6sf. URLosf.io/me6sf_v1

  14. [14]

    Ashworth, The emergence of the worldship (i): The shift from planet- based to space-based civilisation, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 65 (2012) 140–154

    S. Ashworth, The emergence of the worldship (i): The shift from planet- based to space-based civilisation, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 65 (2012) 140–154

  15. [15]

    Krugman, The theory of interstellar trade, Economic Inquiry 48 (4) (2010) 1119–1123

    P. Krugman, The theory of interstellar trade, Economic Inquiry 48 (4) (2010) 1119–1123

  16. [16]

    G. Matloff, The motivation and frequency of interstellar migrations: A possible answer to fermi’s paradox, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society (JBIS), General interstellar issue 72 (6) (2019) 181–185

  17. [17]

    L. K. Hang, On social simulation in 4d relativistic spacetime, in: Con- ference of the European Social Simulation Association, Springer, 2022, pp. 587–598

  18. [18]

    L. K. Hang, Interstellar knowledge dynamics, in: Conference of the Eu- ropean Social Simulation Association, Springer, 2023, pp. 451–462

  19. [19]

    A. Besteiro, The implications of non-faster-than-light type-3 kardashev civilizations, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society (JBIS), Gen- eral interstellar issue 72 (6) (2019) 198–201

  20. [20]

    F. J. Dyson, Time without end: Physics and biology in an open universe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979) 447–460. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.447. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.51. 447

  21. [21]

    Vidal, The Beginning and the End: The Meaning of Life in a Cos- mological Perspective, Springer International Publishing, 2014.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05062-1

    C. Vidal, The Beginning and the End: The Meaning of Life in a Cos- mological Perspective, Springer International Publishing, 2014.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05062-1. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05062-1

  22. [22]

    Black Holes: Attractors for Intelligence?

    C. Vidal, Black holes: Attractors for intelligence? (2011).arXiv: 1104.4362

  23. [23]

    Li, The Fermi paradox through the lens of rela- tivity, [Blog post; accessed 26 Aug 2025] (apr 2022)

    A. Li, The Fermi paradox through the lens of rela- tivity, [Blog post; accessed 26 Aug 2025] (apr 2022). arXiv:https://alexsli.com/thespacebar/2022/4/18/ fermi-paradox-through-the-lens-of-relativity. URLhttps://alexsli.com/thespacebar/2022/4/18/ fermi-paradox-through-the-lens-of-relativity

  24. [24]

    Thorne, The science of Interstellar, WW Norton & Company, 2014

    K. Thorne, The science of Interstellar, WW Norton & Company, 2014

  25. [25]

    K. S. Thorne, Disk accretion onto a black hole. 2. Evolution of the hole., Astrophys. J. 191 (1974) 507–520.doi:10.1086/152991

  26. [26]

    Maximum black-hole spin from quasi-circular binary mergers

    M. Kesden, G. Lockhart, E. S. Phinney, Maximum black-hole spin from quasi-circular binary mergers, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 124045.arXiv: 1005.0627,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.124045

  27. [27]

    A&A643, 64 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 202039213 arXiv:2009.13823 [astro-ph.EP]

    R. Abuter, et al., Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event hori- zon scale, dynamical probes for the mass of Sgr A*, Astron. Astrophys. 677 (2023) L10.arXiv:2307.11821,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 202347416

  28. [28]

    R. A. Daly, M. Donahue, C. P. O’Dea, B. Sebastian, D. Haggard, A. Lu, New Black Hole Spin Values for Sagittarius A* Obtained with the Out- flow MethodarXiv:2310.12108

  29. [29]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (1) (2019) L6.arXiv:1906.11243,doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141

  30. [30]

    Davies, The eerie silence: are we alone in the universe?, Penguin UK, 2010

    P. Davies, The eerie silence: are we alone in the universe?, Penguin UK, 2010

  31. [31]

    M. R. Spencer, H. Hedegaard, M. Garnet, Motor vehicle traffic death rates by sex, age group, and road-user type: United states, 1999-2019, NCHS Data Brief (Mar. 2021).doi:10.15620/cdc:101759

  32. [32]

    Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics: implications for galaxy systems, Astrophys

    M. Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics: implications for galaxy systems, Astrophys. J. 270 (1983) 384–389.doi:10.1086/ 161132

  33. [33]

    Milgrom, A Modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis, Astrophys

    M. Milgrom, A Modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis, Astrophys. J. 270 (1983) 365– 370.doi:10.1086/161130

  34. [34]

    Milgrom, A Modification of the Newtonian dynamics: Implica- tions for galaxies, Astrophys

    M. Milgrom, A Modification of the Newtonian dynamics: Implica- tions for galaxies, Astrophys. J. 270 (1983) 371–383.doi:10.1086/ 161131

  35. [35]

    Bekenstein, M

    J. Bekenstein, M. Milgrom, Does the missing mass problem signal the breakdown of Newtonian gravity?, Astrophys. J. 286 (1984) 7–14.doi: 10.1086/162570

  36. [36]

    K. G. Begeman, A. H. Broeils, R. H. Sanders, Extended rotation curves of spiral galaxies: Dark haloes and modified dynamics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 249 (1991) 523.doi:10.1093/mnras/249.3.523

  37. [37]

    Balazs, T

    C. Balazs, T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, M. White, A Primer on Dark MatterarXiv:2411.05062

  38. [38]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973

  39. [39]

    N. S. Kardashev, Transmission of Information by Extraterrestrial Civi- lizations., Soviet Astronomy 8 (1964) 217

  40. [40]

    J. C. Hafele, R. E. Keating, Around-the-world atomic clocks: Observed relativistic time gains, Science 177 (4044) (1972) 168–170.doi:10. 1126/science.177.4044.168

  41. [41]

    Bailey, K

    J. Bailey, K. Borer, F. Combley, H. Drumm, F. Krienen, F. Lange, E. Pi- casso, W. V on Ruden, F. Farley, J. Field, et al., Measurements of rela- tivistic time dilatation for positive and negative muons in a circular orbit, Nature 268 (5618) (1977) 301–305

  42. [42]

    Bailey, K

    J. Bailey, K. Borer, F. Combley, H. Drumm, C. Eck, F. Farley, J. Field, W. Flegel, P. Hattersley, F. Krienen, et al., Final report on the cern muon storage ring including the anomalous magnetic moment and the electric dipole moment of the muon, and a direct test of relativistic time dilation, Nuclear Physics B 150 (1979) 1–75

  43. [43]

    C. Roos, J. Marraffino, S. Reucroft, J. Waters, M. Webster, E. Williams, A. Manz, R. Settles, G. Wolf,σ±lifetimes and longitudinal acceleration, Nature 286 (5770) (1980) 244–245

  44. [44]

    T. Coan, T. Liu, J. Ye, A compact apparatus for muon lifetime mea- surement and time dilation demonstration in the undergraduate labo- ratory, American Journal of Physics 74 (2) (2006) 161–164.doi: 10.1119/1.2135319. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2135319

  45. [45]

    Bothwell, C

    T. Bothwell, C. J. Kennedy, A. Aeppli, D. Kedar, J. M. Robinson, E. Oelker, A. Staron, J. Ye, Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample, Nature 602 (7897) (2022) 420–424

  46. [46]

    Zheng, J

    X. Zheng, J. Dolde, V . Lochab, B. N. Merriman, H. Li, S. Kolkowitz, Differential clock comparisons with a multiplexed optical lattice clock, Nature 602 (7897) (2022) 425–430

  47. [47]

    Ashby, Relativity and the global positioning system, Physics Today 55 (5) (2002) 41–47.doi:10.1063/1.1485583

    N. Ashby, Relativity and the global positioning system, Physics Today 55 (5) (2002) 41–47.doi:10.1063/1.1485583

  48. [48]

    Ashby, Relativity in the Global Positioning System, Living Rev

    N. Ashby, Relativity in the Global Positioning System, Living Rev. Rel. 6 (2003) 1.doi:10.12942/lrr-2003-1

  49. [49]

    Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Rela- tivity, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 2004

    S. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Rela- tivity, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 2004

  50. [50]

    Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984

    R. Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984

  51. [51]

    G. D. Birkhoff, R. E. Langer, Relativity and modern physics, Harvard University Press, 1927

  52. [52]

    J. T. Jebsen, On the general spherically symmetric solutions of einstein’s gravitational equations in vacuo., Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik 15 (18) (1921) 18

  53. [53]

    F. A. E. Pirani, On the Physical significance of the Riemann tensor, Acta Phys. Polon. 15 (1956) 389–405.doi:10.1007/ s10714-009-0787-9

  54. [54]

    J. L. Synge, On the deviation of geodesics and null-geodesics, partic- ularly in relation to the properties of spaces of constant curvature and indefinite line-element, Annals Math. 35 (1934) 705.doi:10.2307/ 1968486

  55. [55]

    S. P. Goodwin, J. Gribbin, M. A. Hendry, The relative size of the Milky Way, The Observatory 118 (1998) 201–208

  56. [56]

    Marin, et al., X-ray polarization evidence for a 200-year-old flare of Sgr A∗, Nature 619 (7968) (2023) 41–45.arXiv:2304.06967,doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06064-x

    F. Marin, et al., X-ray polarization evidence for a 200-year-old flare of Sgr A∗, Nature 619 (7968) (2023) 41–45.arXiv:2304.06967,doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06064-x

  57. [57]

    S. E. Hosseini, M. Zaja ˇcek, A. Eckart, N. B. Sabha, L. Labadie, Con- straining the accretion flow density profile near sgr a* using the l’-band emission of the s2 star, Astronomy &; Astrophysics 644 (2020) A105. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037724. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037724

  58. [58]

    URLhttps://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review

    Energy Institute, Statistical review of world energy, 74th Edition (2025). URLhttps://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review

  59. [59]

    R. H. Gray, The extended kardashev scale, The Astronomical Journal 159 (5) (2020) 228

  60. [60]

    G. A. Lemarchand, Detectability of extraterrestrial technological activi- 16 ties, SETI Quest 1 (1) (1994) 3–13

  61. [61]

    Sagan, On the Detectivity of Advanced Galactic Civilizations, Icarus 19 (3) (1973) 350–352.doi:10.1016/0019-1035(73)90112-7

    C. Sagan, On the Detectivity of Advanced Galactic Civilizations, Icarus 19 (3) (1973) 350–352.doi:10.1016/0019-1035(73)90112-7

  62. [62]

    C. G. Darwin, The gravity field of a particle, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 249 (1257) (1959) 180–194

  63. [63]

    K. M. Ferriere, The interstellar environment of our galaxy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 1031–1066.arXiv:astro-ph/0106359,doi:10. 1103/RevModPhys.73.1031

  64. [64]

    Penrose, R

    R. Penrose, R. M. Floyd, Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole, Nature 229 (1971) 177–179.doi:10.1038/physci229177a0

  65. [65]

    The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3

    R. Abbott, et al., Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Us- ing Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. X 13 (1) (2023) 011048.arXiv:2111.03634,doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048

  66. [66]

    Olejak, K

    A. Olejak, K. Belczynski, T. Bulik, M. Sobolewska, Synthetic catalog of black holes in the Milky Way, Astron. Astrophys. 638 (2020) A94. arXiv:1908.08775,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936557

  67. [67]

    B. C. Lacki, SETI at Planck Energy: When Particle Physicists Become Cosmic EngineersarXiv:1503.01509

  68. [68]

    J. R. Chisholm, S. Dodelson, E. W. Kolb, Stellar-Mass Black Holes in the Solar Neighborhood, Astrophys. J. 596 (2003) 437–450.arXiv: astro-ph/0205138,doi:10.1086/377628

  69. [69]

    S. L. Shapiro, S. A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact objects, Wiley, 1983.doi:10.1002/ 9783527617661

  70. [70]

    Gilmore, N

    G. Gilmore, N. Reid, New light on faint stars. III - Galactic structure to- wards the South Pole and the Galactic thick disc, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 202 (1983) 1025–1047

  71. [71]

    P. J. McMillan, The mass distribution and gravitational potential of the Milky Way, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465 (1) (2016) 76–94.arXiv: 1608.00971,doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759

  72. [72]

    Brito, V

    R. Brito, V . Cardoso, P. Pani, Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, Lect. Notes Phys. 906 (2015) pp.1–237.arXiv:1501. 06570,doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6

  73. [73]

    The black hole bomb and superradiant instabilities

    V . Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos, S. Yoshida, The Black hole bomb and superradiant instabilities, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 044039, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 70, 049903 (2004)].arXiv:hep-th/0404096, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.049903

  74. [74]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb, Nature 238 (1972) 211–212.doi:10.1038/ 238211a0

  75. [75]

    Lovell, The Great Wall: China Against the World 1000 BC - 2000 AD, Picador, 2007

    J. Lovell, The Great Wall: China Against the World 1000 BC - 2000 AD, Picador, 2007

  76. [76]

    G. C. Sebregondi, R. Schofield, First principles: Gabriele stornaloco and milan cathedral, Architectural History 59 (2016) 63–122.doi:10. 1017/arh.2016.3

  77. [77]

    Lytkin, B

    V . Lytkin, B. Finney, L. Alepko, Tsiolkovsky - Russian Cosmism and Extraterrestrial Intelligence, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomi- cal Society 36 (1995) 369

  78. [78]

    E. M. Jones, ”where is everybody.”an account of fermi’s question, Tech. rep., Los Alamos National Lab., NM (USA) (1985)

  79. [79]

    Tsiolkovsky, The Planets are Occupied by Living Beings, Manuscript in archives of Tsiolkovsky State Museum of the History of Cosmonau- tics, Kaluga, Russia

    K. Tsiolkovsky, The Planets are Occupied by Living Beings, Manuscript in archives of Tsiolkovsky State Museum of the History of Cosmonau- tics, Kaluga, Russia

  80. [80]

    R. H. Gray, The fermi paradox is neither fermi’s nor a paradox, Astrobi- ology 15 (3) (2015) 195–199.doi:10.1089/ast.2014.1247. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ast.2014.1247

Showing first 80 references.