Redshifted civilizations, galactic empires, and the Fermi paradox
Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 11:23 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
A Type II civilization can span the entire Milky Way using extreme time dilation near the central black hole.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
A single Type II civilization can establish a galaxy-spanning civilization with a time dilation factor of 10^4, enabling trips spanning the diameter of the Milky Way within a human lifetime in the civilizational reference frame. Biologically tolerable acceleration levels suffice to reach and maintain stable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* without requiring novel physics or exceeding Type II energy scales. Isotropic, monochromatic signals from orbits near the photon radius of a black hole exhibit a downward frequency drift. The vulnerability of ultrarelativistic vessels to destruction, combined with the relatively short timescales on which adversarial civilizations can arise, provides
What carries the argument
Stable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A*, which produce strong gravitational time dilation while remaining reachable with modest accelerations and energy budgets.
If this is right
- One advanced civilization could connect distant star systems into a single empire on timescales short enough to outpace the rise of competitors.
- Signals sent from these orbits would display a continuous downward frequency drift detectable by outside observers.
- Ultrarrelativistic travel becomes feasible but also more dangerous because other civilizations can develop and attack on short external timescales.
- The setup supplies a concrete mechanism supporting the dark forest hypothesis as a resolution to the Fermi paradox.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Civilizations using these orbits might remain effectively invisible to distant searches because their signals are both redshifted and confined to small angular regions around galactic centers.
- Similar time-dilated empires could form in other galaxies around their own central black holes, leading to a hidden population of advanced societies.
- Searches for downward-drifting monochromatic signals from galactic centers could serve as a direct test for the presence of such orbiting civilizations.
Load-bearing premise
That biologically tolerable acceleration levels suffice to reach and maintain stable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* without requiring novel physics or exceeding Type II energy scales.
What would settle it
A calculation or simulation showing that the acceleration needed to enter and hold a stable orbit at the photon radius of Sgr A* exceeds biologically safe levels or requires energy far above Type II civilization output.
Figures
read the original abstract
Given the vast distances between stars in the Milky Way and the long timescales required for interstellar travel, we consider how a civilization might overcome the constraints arising from finite lifespans and the speed of light without invoking exotic or novel physics. We consider several scenarios in which a civilization can migrate to a time-dilated frame within the scope of classical general relativity and without incurring a biologically intolerable level of acceleration. Remarkably, the power requirements are lower than one might expect; biologically tolerable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* can be maintained by a civilization well below the Type II threshold, and a single Type II civilization can establish a galaxy-spanning civilization with a time dilation factor of $10^4$, enabling trips spanning the diameter of the Milky Way within a human lifetime in the civilizational reference frame. We also find that isotropic, monochromatic signals from orbits near the photon radius of a black hole exhibit a downward frequency drift. The vulnerability of ultrarelativistic vessels to destruction, combined with the relatively short timescales on which adversarial civilizations can arise, provides a strong motivating element for the ``dark forest'' hypothesis.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proposes that advanced civilizations can exploit gravitational time dilation near the photon sphere of Sgr A* to achieve effective interstellar travel on human timescales in their proper frame. It claims that a time-dilation factor of 10^4 is attainable with biologically tolerable proper accelerations, that the required power lies well below the Type II threshold, and that a single such civilization could therefore establish a galaxy-spanning empire; the work further notes a downward frequency drift in isotropic signals from such orbits and invokes these considerations to motivate the dark-forest hypothesis as a resolution of the Fermi paradox.
Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the paper supplies a concrete, parameter-light GR mechanism that converts the usual light-speed barrier into a manageable engineering problem for a Type II civilization. The low power estimate and the explicit link to observable signal drift are potentially falsifiable predictions that could be checked with future radio or gravitational-wave observations; the work therefore adds a new, non-exotic channel to discussions of the Fermi paradox and SETI strategy.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract / main text] Abstract and main text: the central assertion that 'biologically tolerable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* can be maintained by a civilization well below the Type II threshold' is stated without an explicit derivation of the required proper acceleration, thrust, or radiated power. The manuscript should supply the orbit radius corresponding to a dilation factor of 10^4, the Lyapunov exponent of the unstable circular orbit, and the corrective acceleration needed to hold a finite radial deviation (e.g., 10 m), together with the resulting power for a photon-drive habitat of stated mass.
- [Main text] The claim that 'trips spanning the diameter of the Milky Way' become feasible within a human lifetime in the civilizational frame rests on the 10^4 dilation factor; the paper should state the corresponding proper time for a 100 kpc round-trip and confirm that the acceleration budget remains biologically acceptable throughout the boost and coast phases.
minor comments (1)
- The frequency-drift prediction for isotropic, monochromatic signals is interesting but would be clearer if accompanied by a short analytic expression or numerical example showing the expected d f / d t.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments correctly identify places where additional quantitative detail would improve clarity and rigor. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate explicit derivations and calculations addressing both major points, as detailed below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract / main text] Abstract and main text: the central assertion that 'biologically tolerable orbits near the photon radius of Sgr A* can be maintained by a civilization well below the Type II threshold' is stated without an explicit derivation of the required proper acceleration, thrust, or radiated power. The manuscript should supply the orbit radius corresponding to a dilation factor of 10^4, the Lyapunov exponent of the unstable circular orbit, and the corrective acceleration needed to hold a finite radial deviation (e.g., 10 m), together with the resulting power for a photon-drive habitat of stated mass.
Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation strengthens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that supplies the orbit radius r for a dilation factor of 10^4 (r = 1.5 r_s (1 + O(10^{-8}))), the Lyapunov exponent of the unstable circular orbit, the corrective proper acceleration required to hold a 10 m radial deviation, and the resulting radiated power for a photon-drive habitat of stated mass. These quantities confirm that the power remains well below the Type II threshold. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Main text] The claim that 'trips spanning the diameter of the Milky Way' become feasible within a human lifetime in the civilizational frame rests on the 10^4 dilation factor; the paper should state the corresponding proper time for a 100 kpc round-trip and confirm that the acceleration budget remains biologically acceptable throughout the boost and coast phases.
Authors: We agree that stating the proper time explicitly is useful. In the revised manuscript we now include the calculation: the coordinate time for a 100 kpc round-trip at c is approximately 3.26 × 10^5 years, corresponding to a proper time of roughly 33 years under a 10^4 dilation factor. We also confirm that the proper acceleration remains biologically tolerable (below 1 g) during boost phases via gradual profiles and is negligible during coast; the separate orbit-maintenance acceleration is treated in the new derivation subsection. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity identified
full rationale
The paper derives its central claims from the standard Schwarzschild metric time-dilation formula for circular orbits, sqrt(1 - 3M/r), applied to orbits near the photon sphere of Sgr A*, together with Kardashev scale energy budgets and Newtonian estimates for proper acceleration and thrust. These inputs are external to the paper, with no parameters fitted to data within the manuscript, no self-citations invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatzes smuggled in via prior work. The time-dilation factor of 10^4 and the power requirements below Type II thresholds follow directly from the metric and energy scaling without reduction to the paper's own outputs by construction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- time dilation factor =
10^4
axioms (2)
- standard math Classical general relativity accurately describes spacetime near the photon sphere of supermassive black holes.
- domain assumption A civilization can reach and maintain stable orbits at the required radius with biologically tolerable acceleration.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We consider orbits near the photon radius... Γ := dt/dτ = sqrt(r_c/(r_c-3M))
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Tsiolkovsky, The future of earth and mankind, in: B
K. Tsiolkovsky, The future of earth and mankind, in: B. Groys (Ed.), Russian cosmism, MIT Press, 2018, pp. 113–131
work page 2018
-
[2]
R. H. Goddard, The ultimate migration, Journal of the British Interplan- etary Society 36 (1983) 552
work page 1983
-
[3]
J. Cassidy, P. Shaver, Handbook of Attachment, Third Edition: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications, Guilford Publications, 2016
work page 2016
-
[4]
The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity
M. Alcubierre, The Warp drive: Hyperfast travel within general relativ- ity, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) L73–L77.arXiv:gr-qc/0009013, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/5/001 1994
-
[5]
Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: from Einstein to Hawking, AIP Press, 1995
M. Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: from Einstein to Hawking, AIP Press, 1995
work page 1995
-
[6]
Van Den Broeck, A ’Warp drive’ with reasonable total energy re- quirements, Class
C. Van Den Broeck, A ’Warp drive’ with reasonable total energy re- quirements, Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 3973–3979.arXiv:gr-qc/ 9905084,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/314
-
[7]
F. S. N. Lobo (Ed.), Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions, V ol. 189 of Fundamental Theories of Physics, Springer, 2017.arXiv: 2103.05610,doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55182-1
-
[8]
D. H. Coule, No warp drive, Classical and Quantum Gravity 15 (8) (1998) 2523.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/8/026. URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/8/026
-
[9]
C. M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Ex- periment, Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 4.arXiv:1403.7377,doi: 10.12942/lrr-2014-4
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 2014
-
[10]
Gravitational Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar Timing Arrays
N. Yunes, X. Siemens, Gravitational-Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar Timing-Arrays, Living Rev. Rel. 28 (2025) 3.arXiv:1304.3473,doi:https://doi.org/10. 1007/s41114-024-00054-9
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[11]
C. Sagan, Direct contact among galactic civilizations by relativistic interstellar spaceflight, Planetary and Space Science 11 (5) (1963) 485– 498.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(63)90072-2. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0032063363900722 15
-
[12]
E. F. Taylor, J. A. Wheeler, Spacetime physics, Macmillan, 1992. URLhttps://www.eftaylor.com/spacetimephysics/
work page 1992
-
[13]
C. Reiss, Falling forward : The fermi paradox, supermassive black holes, and the likely flight of extraterrestrial intelligence toward extreme time dilation. (Feb 2020).doi:10.31219/osf.io/me6sf. URLosf.io/me6sf_v1
-
[14]
S. Ashworth, The emergence of the worldship (i): The shift from planet- based to space-based civilisation, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 65 (2012) 140–154
work page 2012
-
[15]
Krugman, The theory of interstellar trade, Economic Inquiry 48 (4) (2010) 1119–1123
P. Krugman, The theory of interstellar trade, Economic Inquiry 48 (4) (2010) 1119–1123
work page 2010
-
[16]
G. Matloff, The motivation and frequency of interstellar migrations: A possible answer to fermi’s paradox, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society (JBIS), General interstellar issue 72 (6) (2019) 181–185
work page 2019
-
[17]
L. K. Hang, On social simulation in 4d relativistic spacetime, in: Con- ference of the European Social Simulation Association, Springer, 2022, pp. 587–598
work page 2022
-
[18]
L. K. Hang, Interstellar knowledge dynamics, in: Conference of the Eu- ropean Social Simulation Association, Springer, 2023, pp. 451–462
work page 2023
-
[19]
A. Besteiro, The implications of non-faster-than-light type-3 kardashev civilizations, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society (JBIS), Gen- eral interstellar issue 72 (6) (2019) 198–201
work page 2019
-
[20]
F. J. Dyson, Time without end: Physics and biology in an open universe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979) 447–460. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.447. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.51. 447
-
[21]
C. Vidal, The Beginning and the End: The Meaning of Life in a Cos- mological Perspective, Springer International Publishing, 2014.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05062-1. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05062-1
-
[22]
Black Holes: Attractors for Intelligence?
C. Vidal, Black holes: Attractors for intelligence? (2011).arXiv: 1104.4362
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[23]
Li, The Fermi paradox through the lens of rela- tivity, [Blog post; accessed 26 Aug 2025] (apr 2022)
A. Li, The Fermi paradox through the lens of rela- tivity, [Blog post; accessed 26 Aug 2025] (apr 2022). arXiv:https://alexsli.com/thespacebar/2022/4/18/ fermi-paradox-through-the-lens-of-relativity. URLhttps://alexsli.com/thespacebar/2022/4/18/ fermi-paradox-through-the-lens-of-relativity
work page 2025
-
[24]
Thorne, The science of Interstellar, WW Norton & Company, 2014
K. Thorne, The science of Interstellar, WW Norton & Company, 2014
work page 2014
-
[25]
K. S. Thorne, Disk accretion onto a black hole. 2. Evolution of the hole., Astrophys. J. 191 (1974) 507–520.doi:10.1086/152991
-
[26]
Maximum black-hole spin from quasi-circular binary mergers
M. Kesden, G. Lockhart, E. S. Phinney, Maximum black-hole spin from quasi-circular binary mergers, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 124045.arXiv: 1005.0627,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.124045
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.124045 2010
-
[27]
A&A643, 64 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 202039213 arXiv:2009.13823 [astro-ph.EP]
R. Abuter, et al., Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event hori- zon scale, dynamical probes for the mass of Sgr A*, Astron. Astrophys. 677 (2023) L10.arXiv:2307.11821,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 202347416
- [28]
-
[29]
First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole
K. Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (1) (2019) L6.arXiv:1906.11243,doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141 2019
-
[30]
Davies, The eerie silence: are we alone in the universe?, Penguin UK, 2010
P. Davies, The eerie silence: are we alone in the universe?, Penguin UK, 2010
work page 2010
-
[31]
M. R. Spencer, H. Hedegaard, M. Garnet, Motor vehicle traffic death rates by sex, age group, and road-user type: United states, 1999-2019, NCHS Data Brief (Mar. 2021).doi:10.15620/cdc:101759
-
[32]
Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics: implications for galaxy systems, Astrophys
M. Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics: implications for galaxy systems, Astrophys. J. 270 (1983) 384–389.doi:10.1086/ 161132
work page 1983
-
[33]
M. Milgrom, A Modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis, Astrophys. J. 270 (1983) 365– 370.doi:10.1086/161130
-
[34]
Milgrom, A Modification of the Newtonian dynamics: Implica- tions for galaxies, Astrophys
M. Milgrom, A Modification of the Newtonian dynamics: Implica- tions for galaxies, Astrophys. J. 270 (1983) 371–383.doi:10.1086/ 161131
work page 1983
-
[35]
J. Bekenstein, M. Milgrom, Does the missing mass problem signal the breakdown of Newtonian gravity?, Astrophys. J. 286 (1984) 7–14.doi: 10.1086/162570
-
[36]
K. G. Begeman, A. H. Broeils, R. H. Sanders, Extended rotation curves of spiral galaxies: Dark haloes and modified dynamics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 249 (1991) 523.doi:10.1093/mnras/249.3.523
- [37]
-
[38]
C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973
work page 1973
-
[39]
N. S. Kardashev, Transmission of Information by Extraterrestrial Civi- lizations., Soviet Astronomy 8 (1964) 217
work page 1964
-
[40]
J. C. Hafele, R. E. Keating, Around-the-world atomic clocks: Observed relativistic time gains, Science 177 (4044) (1972) 168–170.doi:10. 1126/science.177.4044.168
work page 1972
- [41]
-
[42]
J. Bailey, K. Borer, F. Combley, H. Drumm, C. Eck, F. Farley, J. Field, W. Flegel, P. Hattersley, F. Krienen, et al., Final report on the cern muon storage ring including the anomalous magnetic moment and the electric dipole moment of the muon, and a direct test of relativistic time dilation, Nuclear Physics B 150 (1979) 1–75
work page 1979
-
[43]
C. Roos, J. Marraffino, S. Reucroft, J. Waters, M. Webster, E. Williams, A. Manz, R. Settles, G. Wolf,σ±lifetimes and longitudinal acceleration, Nature 286 (5770) (1980) 244–245
work page 1980
-
[44]
T. Coan, T. Liu, J. Ye, A compact apparatus for muon lifetime mea- surement and time dilation demonstration in the undergraduate labo- ratory, American Journal of Physics 74 (2) (2006) 161–164.doi: 10.1119/1.2135319. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2135319
-
[45]
T. Bothwell, C. J. Kennedy, A. Aeppli, D. Kedar, J. M. Robinson, E. Oelker, A. Staron, J. Ye, Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample, Nature 602 (7897) (2022) 420–424
work page 2022
- [46]
-
[47]
N. Ashby, Relativity and the global positioning system, Physics Today 55 (5) (2002) 41–47.doi:10.1063/1.1485583
-
[48]
Ashby, Relativity in the Global Positioning System, Living Rev
N. Ashby, Relativity in the Global Positioning System, Living Rev. Rel. 6 (2003) 1.doi:10.12942/lrr-2003-1
-
[49]
S. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Rela- tivity, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 2004
work page 2004
-
[50]
Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984
R. Wald, General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984
work page 1984
-
[51]
G. D. Birkhoff, R. E. Langer, Relativity and modern physics, Harvard University Press, 1927
work page 1927
-
[52]
J. T. Jebsen, On the general spherically symmetric solutions of einstein’s gravitational equations in vacuo., Arkiv for Matematik, Astronomi och Fysik 15 (18) (1921) 18
work page 1921
-
[53]
F. A. E. Pirani, On the Physical significance of the Riemann tensor, Acta Phys. Polon. 15 (1956) 389–405.doi:10.1007/ s10714-009-0787-9
work page 1956
-
[54]
J. L. Synge, On the deviation of geodesics and null-geodesics, partic- ularly in relation to the properties of spaces of constant curvature and indefinite line-element, Annals Math. 35 (1934) 705.doi:10.2307/ 1968486
work page 1934
-
[55]
S. P. Goodwin, J. Gribbin, M. A. Hendry, The relative size of the Milky Way, The Observatory 118 (1998) 201–208
work page 1998
-
[56]
F. Marin, et al., X-ray polarization evidence for a 200-year-old flare of Sgr A∗, Nature 619 (7968) (2023) 41–45.arXiv:2304.06967,doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06064-x
-
[57]
S. E. Hosseini, M. Zaja ˇcek, A. Eckart, N. B. Sabha, L. Labadie, Con- straining the accretion flow density profile near sgr a* using the l’-band emission of the s2 star, Astronomy &; Astrophysics 644 (2020) A105. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037724. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037724
-
[58]
URLhttps://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review
Energy Institute, Statistical review of world energy, 74th Edition (2025). URLhttps://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review
work page 2025
-
[59]
R. H. Gray, The extended kardashev scale, The Astronomical Journal 159 (5) (2020) 228
work page 2020
-
[60]
G. A. Lemarchand, Detectability of extraterrestrial technological activi- 16 ties, SETI Quest 1 (1) (1994) 3–13
work page 1994
-
[61]
C. Sagan, On the Detectivity of Advanced Galactic Civilizations, Icarus 19 (3) (1973) 350–352.doi:10.1016/0019-1035(73)90112-7
-
[62]
C. G. Darwin, The gravity field of a particle, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 249 (1257) (1959) 180–194
work page 1959
-
[63]
K. M. Ferriere, The interstellar environment of our galaxy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 1031–1066.arXiv:astro-ph/0106359,doi:10. 1103/RevModPhys.73.1031
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[64]
R. Penrose, R. M. Floyd, Extraction of rotational energy from a black hole, Nature 229 (1971) 177–179.doi:10.1038/physci229177a0
-
[65]
The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3
R. Abbott, et al., Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Us- ing Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. X 13 (1) (2023) 011048.arXiv:2111.03634,doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011048 2023
-
[66]
A. Olejak, K. Belczynski, T. Bulik, M. Sobolewska, Synthetic catalog of black holes in the Milky Way, Astron. Astrophys. 638 (2020) A94. arXiv:1908.08775,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936557
-
[67]
B. C. Lacki, SETI at Planck Energy: When Particle Physicists Become Cosmic EngineersarXiv:1503.01509
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[68]
J. R. Chisholm, S. Dodelson, E. W. Kolb, Stellar-Mass Black Holes in the Solar Neighborhood, Astrophys. J. 596 (2003) 437–450.arXiv: astro-ph/0205138,doi:10.1086/377628
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/377628 2003
-
[69]
S. L. Shapiro, S. A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact objects, Wiley, 1983.doi:10.1002/ 9783527617661
work page 1983
-
[70]
G. Gilmore, N. Reid, New light on faint stars. III - Galactic structure to- wards the South Pole and the Galactic thick disc, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 202 (1983) 1025–1047
work page 1983
-
[71]
P. J. McMillan, The mass distribution and gravitational potential of the Milky Way, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465 (1) (2016) 76–94.arXiv: 1608.00971,doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759 2016
-
[72]
R. Brito, V . Cardoso, P. Pani, Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics, Lect. Notes Phys. 906 (2015) pp.1–237.arXiv:1501. 06570,doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19000-6
-
[73]
The black hole bomb and superradiant instabilities
V . Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos, S. Yoshida, The Black hole bomb and superradiant instabilities, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 044039, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 70, 049903 (2004)].arXiv:hep-th/0404096, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.049903
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.049903 2004
-
[74]
W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb, Nature 238 (1972) 211–212.doi:10.1038/ 238211a0
work page 1972
-
[75]
Lovell, The Great Wall: China Against the World 1000 BC - 2000 AD, Picador, 2007
J. Lovell, The Great Wall: China Against the World 1000 BC - 2000 AD, Picador, 2007
work page 2000
-
[76]
G. C. Sebregondi, R. Schofield, First principles: Gabriele stornaloco and milan cathedral, Architectural History 59 (2016) 63–122.doi:10. 1017/arh.2016.3
work page 2016
- [77]
-
[78]
E. M. Jones, ”where is everybody.”an account of fermi’s question, Tech. rep., Los Alamos National Lab., NM (USA) (1985)
work page 1985
-
[79]
K. Tsiolkovsky, The Planets are Occupied by Living Beings, Manuscript in archives of Tsiolkovsky State Museum of the History of Cosmonau- tics, Kaluga, Russia
-
[80]
R. H. Gray, The fermi paradox is neither fermi’s nor a paradox, Astrobi- ology 15 (3) (2015) 195–199.doi:10.1089/ast.2014.1247. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ast.2014.1247
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.