arxiv: 2510.01317 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE

Expectations for the first supermassive black-hole binary resolved by PTAs I: Model efficacy

Levi Schult , Polina Petrov , Stephen R. Taylor , Nihan Pol , Nima Laal , Maria Charisi , Chung-Pei Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 10:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE

keywords pulsar timing arrayssupermassive black hole binariesgravitational wave searchesbayesian model comparisonearth and pulsar termssignal templates

0 comments

The pith

A template using both Earth and pulsar terms of a gravitational wave signal outperforms other models in detecting individual supermassive black hole binaries with pulsar timing arrays.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper emulates growing pulsar timing array datasets that contain a Gaussian gravitational wave background plus one injected supermassive black hole binary. It tests three search methods on many noise realizations while varying source strength, frequency, and sky position. The model that includes the complete gravitational wave signal structure, meaning both the Earth-term and pulsar-term effects, produces the highest Bayes factors and the most reliable recovery of source parameters. A new cross-correlation model called Spike Pixel reaches useful detection thresholds at moderate signal strengths but is generally surpassed by the full-signal template. These comparisons set quantitative expectations for when the first individual binary might be resolved as arrays add more pulsars and longer baselines.

Core claim

We find that a template-based search including the full gravitational-wave signal structure returns the highest Bayes Factors and the most robust parameter estimation. The Earth-term-only template struggles at low frequencies, while the Spike Pixel model, which treats the signal as excess directional power without phase information, still yields competitive sky-location and frequency constraints at source strengths around S/N of 12-13.

What carries the argument

The full gravitational-wave signal template model that incorporates both Earth-term and pulsar-term effects of an incident wave.

If this is right

Detection of the first individual binary becomes feasible once source strengths reach S/N of roughly 7-15 with the full-signal model.
Low-frequency binaries near 5 nHz require higher source strengths of S/N 16-19 to reach comparable Bayes factor thresholds.
The Spike Pixel model can still constrain sky location and frequency to useful levels once S/N exceeds about 12.
Quantitative milestones for a first resolved binary are supplied in the companion paper.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

As pulsar timing arrays continue to expand, prioritizing full-signal template searches should accelerate the timeline for isolating the first individual binary from the background.
Low-frequency sources may need explicit modeling of pulsar-Earth term overlap to avoid systematic losses in sensitivity.
Cross-correlation approaches like Spike Pixel could be hybridized with phase information to close the remaining performance gap with full templates.

Load-bearing premise

Simulated datasets that combine a Gaussian gravitational wave background with deterministic injected binary signals capture the statistical properties and confusion effects of real pulsar timing array observations.

What would settle it

In actual pulsar timing array data, a search that omits the pulsar term would need to return systematically higher Bayes factors or tighter parameter posteriors than the full-signal template across multiple sources and frequencies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.01317 by Chung-Pei Ma, Levi Schult, Maria Charisi, Nihan Pol, Nima Laal, Polina Petrov, Stephen R. Taylor.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. We show the median and full range of the Savage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Since the Savage-Dickey Bayes factor becomes unre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. We average over the four binary injections and all re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Realization-median 68% credible intervals as a function of time slice and (S [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Evolution of the characteristic strain spectrum found by the SP model with an increasing number of pulsars and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

One of the most promising targets for Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTAs) is identifying an individual supermassive black hole binary (SMBHB) out of the population of binaries theorized to produce a gravitational wave background (GWB). In this work, we emulate realistic PTA datasets, complete with an increasing number of pulsars and timing baseline, in which we inject a single binary on top of a Gaussian GWB. We vary the binary's source parameters, including sky position and frequency, and create ten noise realizations for each source/PTA combination to synthesize an ensemble of datasets to assess current Bayesian binary search techniques. We develop a novel, cross-correlation based model, Spike Pixel (SP), tuned for the frequency-specific anisotropy induced by an individual SMBHB and compare its binary detection and characterization capabilities to two waveform-based template models. We find that a template-based search including the full gravitational-wave signal structure (i.e., both the Earth and pulsar effects of an incident GW) returns the highest Bayes Factors (BF) and the most robust parameter estimation. SP attains a realization-median BF>10 at source strengths (S/N)~7-15. Interestingly, despite being a deterministic model, the Earth-term template struggles to identify and characterize low-frequency binaries (i.e., 5 nHz). These binaries require higher source strengths (S/N)~16-19 to reach the same BF threshold. This is likely due to neglected confusion effects between the pulsar and Earth terms. By contrast, SP shows promise for parameter estimation despite treating a binary's GW signal as excess directional GW power without phase modeling. Sky location and frequency parameter constraints returned by SP are only surpassed by the Earth term template model at (S/N)~12-13. Milestones for a first detection using the full-signal GW model are included in a companion paper Petrov et al. 2026.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The full-signal template outperforms Spike Pixel and Earth-term models on these injections, but the Gaussian GWB leaves the results optimistic for real discrete-source confusion.

read the letter

Look, the core result here is that the full Earth-plus-pulsar term template beats the new Spike Pixel model and the Earth-term only one when it comes to Bayes factors and parameter recovery for these injected binaries. The numbers they give are useful: Spike Pixel hits decent detection thresholds at lower signal strengths than the Earth-term model does at low frequencies. They do a good job laying out the simulations with ten noise realizations per setup and varying the binary parameters across sky positions and frequencies. That lets them report median performance and flag the low-frequency weakness in the simpler template. The comparison is direct and the framework builds sensibly on existing PTA search methods. The limitation that stands out is the Gaussian gravitational wave background. Since the actual background comes from a bunch of discrete binaries, the non-Gaussian confusion and mutual interference aren't captured here. The paper already sees Earth-pulsar confusion at low frequencies, so a more realistic background could make detection harder and maybe change which model looks best. It's not a deal-breaker for a methods paper, but it does mean these results are optimistic for real PTA data. The stress test concern holds up on that point. This is the kind of work that PTA data analysts will want to read when they start planning for individual source searches. It gives concrete targets for signal strength needed for a first detection. The simulations are straightforward enough that it should go to peer review for comments on the background choice and any code details. I'd say send it out for review rather than reject it at the desk. The quantitative benchmarks are worth referee eyes even with the modeling simplification.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper emulates realistic PTA datasets with an increasing number of pulsars and timing baselines, injecting a single deterministic SMBHB signal atop a Gaussian GWB. It compares a novel cross-correlation-based Spike Pixel (SP) model, tuned to frequency-specific anisotropy, against two waveform template models (Earth-term only and full Earth+pulsar term). Using ten noise realizations per source/PTA configuration and varying binary parameters including sky position and frequency, the authors report that the full-signal template yields the highest Bayes factors and most robust parameter estimation, while SP achieves median BF>10 at S/N ~7-15 and competitive sky/frequency constraints, and the Earth-term model requires higher S/N (~16-19) at low frequencies (~5 nHz) due to neglected confusion.

Significance. If the reported performance ordering holds, the work supplies concrete milestones and model-selection guidance for the first resolved SMBHB in PTA data, complementing the companion paper on detection thresholds. Explicit credit is due for the ensemble approach with multiple noise realizations and parameter variations, which supports the median performance claims, and for the development of the SP model as a phase-agnostic alternative that still recovers useful constraints.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract and simulation setup: the central performance comparison (full-signal template outperforming Earth-term and SP) is obtained exclusively under a Gaussian GWB. This approximation omits the non-Gaussian statistics and mutual confusion that would arise from a finite population of other SMBHBs—the physical origin of the GWB itself, as noted in the abstract. At low frequencies the abstract already identifies Earth-pulsar term confusion as important; a non-Gaussian background would likely amplify such effects and could reorder the relative efficacy of the three models.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: reported S/N thresholds for BF>10 lack error bars or inter-realization ranges, and no explicit likelihood forms or verification against post-injection selection effects are supplied.
[Introduction] Notation and presentation: the distinction between the two waveform-based templates should be stated more explicitly when first introduced, including the precise treatment of the pulsar term in each case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and simulation setup: the central performance comparison (full-signal template outperforming Earth-term and SP) is obtained exclusively under a Gaussian GWB. This approximation omits the non-Gaussian statistics and mutual confusion that would arise from a finite population of other SMBHBs—the physical origin of the GWB itself, as noted in the abstract. At low frequencies the abstract already identifies Earth-pulsar term confusion as important; a non-Gaussian background would likely amplify such effects and could reorder the relative efficacy of the three models.

Authors: We agree that our simulations employ a Gaussian GWB, which is an approximation that does not capture the non-Gaussian statistics or mutual confusion from a finite population of SMBHBs. This limitation is particularly pertinent at low frequencies, where Earth-pulsar term confusion is already identified in the abstract as relevant. While the Gaussian approximation is standard for computational feasibility in PTA analyses focused on a single loud source, we acknowledge that a realistic discrete population could introduce additional effects that might influence the relative performance of the full-signal template, Earth-term template, and Spike Pixel model. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Discussion section with an explicit paragraph addressing this caveat and its implications for the reported model efficacy and detection milestones. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; performance metrics arise from independent forward simulations

full rationale

The paper evaluates model efficacy by injecting known deterministic SMBHB signals into simulated PTA datasets that include a Gaussian GWB, then computing Bayes factors and parameter estimation accuracy across noise realizations, source parameters, and PTA configurations. This Monte Carlo setup directly measures relative performance of the full-signal template, Earth-term template, and SP model without fitting any parameters to the reported metrics or reducing claims to self-referential definitions. No load-bearing step equates a result to its own inputs by construction, and the cited companion paper addresses separate milestones rather than justifying the present comparisons.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard PTA simulation assumptions and the efficacy of the developed SP model; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

number of noise realizations
Ten realizations chosen to synthesize an ensemble for median BF assessment

axioms (1)

domain assumption The gravitational wave background is Gaussian
Explicitly stated as the background onto which the single binary is injected

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5902 in / 1316 out tokens · 48914 ms · 2026-05-18T10:11:42.039190+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We find that a template-based search including the full gravitational-wave signal structure (i.e., both the Earth and pulsar effects of an incident GW) returns the highest Bayes Factors (BF) and the most robust parameter estimation.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The GWB is injected as a spatially-correlated red noise process with a power law spectral index γ_GWB = 13/3 ... and amplitude A_GWB = 2.4×10^{-15}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Archival Multiband Gravitational-Wave Signals from Massive Black Hole Binary Mergers
astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

Massive black hole binary mergers produce orphaned low-frequency signals in PTA pulsar terms that can be stacked for archival multiband gravitational-wave detection.
Expectations for the first supermassive black-hole binary resolved by PTAs II: Milestones for binary characterization
astro-ph.IM 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Simulations of continuous-wave searches show that PTA data first constrain GW frequency and strain amplitude together, then sky location, with chirp mass and inclination following later for evolving sources, with prec...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 40 internal anchors

[1]

Expectations for the first supermassive black-hole binary resolved by PTAs II: Milestones for binary characterization

P. Petrov, L. Schult, S. R. Taylor, N. Pol, N. Laal, M. Charisi, and C.-P. Ma, Expectations for the first supermassive black-hole binary resolved by PTAs II: Milestones for binary characterization, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.01316 (2025), arXiv:2510.01316 [astro- ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[2]

Detweiler, Pulsar timing measurements and the search for gravitational waves, ApJ234, 1100 (1979)

S. Detweiler, Pulsar timing measurements and the search for gravitational waves, ApJ234, 1100 (1979)

work page 1979
[3]

M. V. Sazhin, Opportunities for detecting ultralong gravitational waves, Soviet Ast.22, 36 (1978)

work page 1978
[4]

J. J. Condon and S. M. Ransom,Essential radio astron- omy(Princeton University Press, 2016)

work page 2016
[5]

D. R. Lorimer and M. Kramer,Handbook of pulsar as- tronomy, Vol. 4 (Cambridge university press, 2005)

work page 2005
[6]

Pulsar Timing Array Observations of Massive Black Hole Binaries

V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, Pulsar Timing Array Observations of Massive Black Hole Binaries, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:1008.1782 (2010), arXiv:1008.1782 [astro- ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[7]

M. C. Begelman, R. D. Blandford, and M. J. Rees, Mas- sive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei, Nature 287, 307 (1980)

work page 1980
[8]

Holley-Bockelmann, F

K. Holley-Bockelmann, F. Khan, I. Williams, J. Roth, M. Rizzo Smith, K. Porter, J. Bellovary, A. Derdzinski, and A. Macci` o, Handy Relation Between Binary Black Hole Merger Times and Host Galaxy Properties, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.14253 (2025), arXiv:2508.14253 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2025
[9]

Long Term Evolution of Massive Black Hole Binaries

M. Milosavljevi´ c and D. Merritt, Long-Term Evolution of Massive Black Hole Binaries, ApJ596, 860 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0212459 [astro-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[10]

The Astrophysics of Nanohertz Gravitational Waves

S. Burke-Spolaor, S. R. Taylor, M. Charisi, T. Dolch, J. S. Hazboun, A. M. Holgado, L. Z. Kelley, T. J. W. Lazio, D. R. Madison, N. McMann, C. M. F. Min- garelli, A. Rasskazov, X. Siemens, J. J. Simon, and 18 T. L. Smith, The astrophysics of nanohertz gravitational waves, A&A Rev.27, 5 (2019), arXiv:1811.08826 [astro- ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[11]

LISA Definition Study Report

M. Colpi, K. Danzmann, M. Hewitson, K. Holley- Bockelmann, P. Jetzer, G. Nelemans, A. Petiteau, D. Shoemaker, C. Sopuerta, R. Stebbins, N. Tanvir, H. Ward, W. J. Weber, I. Thorpe, A. Daurskikh, A. Deep, I. Fern´ andez N´ u˜ nez, C. Garc´ ıa Marirrodriga, M. Gehler, J.-P. Halain, O. Jennrich, U. Lammers, J. Larra˜ naga, M. Lieser, N. L¨ utzgendorf, W. Mart...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[12]

Mukherjee, Y

D. Mukherjee, Y. Zhou, N. Chen, U. N. Di Carlo, and T. Di Matteo, MAGICS. III. Seeds Sink Swiftly: Nu- clear Star Clusters Dramatically Accelerate Seed Black Hole Mergers, ApJ981, 203 (2025), arXiv:2409.19095 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Bortolas, M

E. Bortolas, M. Bonetti, M. Dotti, A. Lupi, P. R. Capelo, L. Mayer, and A. Sesana, The role of bars on the dynamical-friction-driven inspiral of massive objects, MNRAS512, 3365 (2022), arXiv:2103.07486 [astro- ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2022
[14]

F. M. Khan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, P. Berczik, and A. Just, Supermassive Black Hole Binary Evolution in Axisymmetric Galaxies: The Final Parsec Problem is Not a Problem, ApJ773, 100 (2013), arXiv:1302.1871 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[15]

M. A. Mirza, A. Tahir, F. M. Khan, H. Holley- Bockelmann, A. M. Baig, P. Berczik, and F. Chishtie, Galaxy rotation and supermassive black hole binary evolution, MNRAS470, 940 (2017), arXiv:1704.03490 [astro-ph.GA]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[16]

Bogdanovi´ c, M

T. Bogdanovi´ c, M. C. Miller, and L. Blecha, Elec- tromagnetic counterparts to massive black-hole merg- ers, Living Reviews in Relativity25, 3 (2022), arXiv:2109.03262 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

D. J. D’Orazio and M. Charisi, Observational Sig- natures of Supermassive Black Hole Binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.16896 (2023), arXiv:2310.16896 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2023
[18]

Multi-Messenger Astrophysics with Pulsar Timing Arrays

L. Kelley, M. Charisi, S. Burke-Spolaor, J. Simon, L. Blecha, T. Bogdanovic, M. Colpi, J. Comerford, D. D’Orazio, M. Dotti, M. Eracleous, M. Graham, J. Greene, Z. Haiman, K. Holley-Bockelmann, E. Kara, B. Kelly, S. Komossa, S. Larson, X. Liu, C. P. Ma, S. Noble, V. Paschalidis, R. Rafikov, V. Ravi, J. Run- noe, A. Sesana, D. Stern, M. A. Strauss, V. U, M....

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[19]

P. A. Rosado, A. Sesana, and J. Gair, Expected prop- erties of the first gravitational wave signal detected with pulsar timing arrays, MNRAS451, 2417 (2015), arXiv:1503.04803 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[20]

E. C. Gardiner, L. Z. Kelley, A.-M. Lemke, and A. Mitridate, Beyond the Background: Gravitational- wave Anisotropy and Continuous Waves from Super- massive Black Hole Binaries, ApJ965, 164 (2024), arXiv:2309.07227 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[21]

A study of spatial correlations in pulsar timing array data

C. Tiburzi, G. Hobbs, M. Kerr, W. A. Coles, S. Dai, R. N. Manchester, A. Possenti, R. M. Shannon, and X. P. You, A study of spatial correlations in pul- sar timing array data, MNRAS455, 4339 (2016), arXiv:1510.02363 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[22]

R. W. Hellings and G. S. Downs, Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational radiation background from pul- sar timing analysis., ApJ265, L39 (1983)

work page 1983
[23]

(International Pulsar Timing Array) 2024 Astrophys

G. Agazie, J. Antoniadis, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, P. Arumugam, S. Arumugam, Z. Arzouma- nian, J. Askew, S. Babak, M. Bagchi, M. Bailes, A. S. Bak Nielsen, P. T. Baker, C. G. Bassa, A. Bathula, B. B´ ecsy, A. Berthereau, N. D. R. Bhat, L. Blecha, M. Bonetti, E. Bortolas, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, M. Burgay, S. Burke-Spolaor, R. Burnette, R. N. Ca-...

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Ar- zoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B´ ecsy, L. Blecha, A. Bra- zier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, R. Burnette, R. Case, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, K. Chatziioan- nou, B. D. Cheeseboro, S. Chen, T. Cohen, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromartie, K. Crowter, C. J. Cutler, M. E. Decesar, D. Dega...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[25]

An- toniadis, P

EPTA Collaboration, InPTA Collaboration, J. An- toniadis, P. Arumugam, S. Arumugam, S. Babak, M. Bagchi, A. S. Bak Nielsen, C. G. Bassa, A. Bathula, A. Berthereau, M. Bonetti, E. Bortolas, P. R. Brook, M. Burgay, R. N. Caballero, A. Chalumeau, D. J. Champion, S. Chanlaridis, S. Chen, I. Cognard, S. Dan- dapat, D. Deb, S. Desai, G. Desvignes, N. Dhanda- Ba...

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

D. J. Reardon, A. Zic, R. M. Shannon, G. B. Hobbs, M. Bailes, V. Di Marco, A. Kapur, A. F. Rogers, E. Thrane, J. Askew, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Cameron, M. Cury lo, W. A. Coles, S. Dai, B. Goncharov, M. Kerr, A. Kulkarni, Y. Levin, M. E. Lower, R. N. Manchester, R. Mandow, M. T. Miles, R. S. Nathan, S. Os lowski, C. J. Russell, R. Spiewak, S. Zhang, and X.-J. Z...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[27]

H. Xu, S. Chen, Y. Guo, J. Jiang, B. Wang, J. Xu, Z. Xue, R. Nicolas Caballero, J. Yuan, Y. Xu, J. Wang, L. Hao, J. Luo, K. Lee, J. Han, P. Jiang, Z. Shen, M. Wang, N. Wang, R. Xu, X. Wu, R. Manchester, L. Qian, X. Guan, M. Huang, C. Sun, and Y. Zhu, Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Ar- r...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[28]

M. T. Miles, R. M. Shannon, D. J. Reardon, M. Bailes, D. J. Champion, M. Geyer, P. Gitika, K. Grunthal, M. J. Keith, M. Kramer, A. D. Kulkarni, R. S. Nathan, A. Parthasarathy, J. Singha, G. Theureau, E. Thrane, F. Abbate, S. Buchner, A. D. Cameron, F. Camilo, B. E. Moreschi, G. Shaifullah, M. Shamohammadi, A. Pos- senti, and V. V. Krishnan, The MeerKAT Pu...

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Agazie, A

G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, P. T. Baker, B. B´ ecsy, L. Blecha, A. Bonilla, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, R. Burnette, R. Case, J. A. Casey-Clyde, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, K. Chatzi- ioannou, B. D. Cheeseboro, S. Chen, T. Cohen, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromartie, K. Crowter, C. J. Cutler, D. J. D’Ora...

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics

A. Afzal, G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B´ ecsy, J. J. Blanco- Pillado, L. Blecha, K. K. Boddy, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, R. Burnette, R. Case, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, K. Chatziioannou, B. D. Cheeseboro, S. Chen, T. Cohen, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromartie, K. Crowt...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[31]

X. J. Zhu, L. Wen, G. Hobbs, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, D. R. Madison, R. N. Manchester, M. Kerr, P. A. Rosado, and J. B. Wang, Detection and localization of single-source gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays, MNRAS 449, 1650 (2015), arXiv:1502.06001 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[32]

Gundersen and N

A. Gundersen and N. Cornish, Rapid inference for indi- vidual binaries and a stochastic background with Pulsar Timing Array data, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.13379 (2024), arXiv:2412.13379 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

B´ ecsy, N

B. B´ ecsy, N. J. Cornish, and M. C. Digman, Fast Bayesian analysis of individual binaries in pulsar tim- ing array data, Phys. Rev. D105, 122003 (2022), arXiv:2204.07160 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[34]

J. A. Ellis, A Bayesian analysis pipeline for continu- ous GW sources in the PTA band, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity30, 224004 (2013), arXiv:1305.0835 [astro- ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[35]

B. B´ ecsy, Efficient Bayesian inference and model selec- tion for continuous gravitational waves in pulsar timing array data, Classical and Quantum Gravity41, 225017 (2024), arXiv:2406.16331 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

S. R. Taylor, R. van Haasteren, and A. Sesana, From bright binaries to bumpy backgrounds: Mapping realis- tic gravitational wave skies with pulsar-timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D102, 084039 (2020), arXiv:2006.04810 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

J. M. Goldstein, J. Veitch, A. Sesana, and A. Vecchio, Null-stream analysis of Pulsar Timing Array data: lo- calization of resolvable gravitational wave sources, MN- RAS477, 5447 (2018), arXiv:1712.03975 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[38]

Pulsar timing arrays as imaging gravitational wave telescopes: angular resolution and source (de)confusion

L. Boyle and U.-L. Pen, Pulsar timing arrays as imaging gravitational wave telescopes: Angular resolution and source (de)confusion, Phys. Rev. D86, 124028 (2012), arXiv:1010.4337 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[39]

Charisi, S

M. Charisi, S. R. Taylor, C. A. Witt, and J. Run- noe, Efficient Large-Scale, Targeted Gravitational- Wave Probes of Supermassive Black-Hole Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 061401 (2024), arXiv:2304.03786 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[40]

X. J. Zhu, L. Wen, J. Xiong, Y. Xu, Y. Wang, S. D. Mohanty, G. Hobbs, and R. N. Manchester, Detection and localization of continuous gravitational waves with pulsar timing arrays: the role of pulsar terms, MNRAS 461, 1317 (2016), arXiv:1606.04539 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[41]

Ferranti, G

I. Ferranti, G. Shaifullah, A. Chalumeau, and A. Sesana, Separating deterministic and stochastic grav- itational wave signals in realistic pulsar timing ar- ray datasets, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.21105 (2024), arXiv:2407.21105 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

S. R. Taylor, E. A. Huerta, J. R. Gair, and S. T. McWilliams, Detecting Eccentric Supermas- sive Black Hole Binaries with Pulsar Timing Arrays: Resolvable Source Strategies, ApJ817, 70 (2016), arXiv:1505.06208 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[43]

Petrov, S

P. Petrov, S. R. Taylor, M. Charisi, and C.-P. Ma, Iden- tifying the Host Galaxies of Supermassive Black Hole Binaries Found by Pulsar Timing Arrays, ApJ976, 129 (2024), arXiv:2406.04409 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

R. J. Truant, D. Izquierdo-Villalba, A. Sesana, G. Mo- hiuddin Shaifullah, M. Bonetti, D. Spinoso, and S. Bonoli, Lighting up the nano-hertz gravitational wave sky: opportunities and challenges of multimessen- ger astronomy with PTA experiments, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.01074 (2025), arXiv:2504.01074 [astro- ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Measuring the parameters of massive black hole binary systems with Pulsar Timing Array observations of gravitational waves

A. Sesana and A. Vecchio, Measuring the parameters of massive black hole binary systems with pulsar timing 21 array observations of gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 81, 104008 (2010), arXiv:1003.0677 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[46]

J. M. Goldstein, A. Sesana, A. M. Holgado, and J. Veitch, Associating host galaxy candidates to mas- sive black hole binaries resolved by pulsar timing ar- rays, MNRAS485, 248 (2019), arXiv:1812.02670 [astro- ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[47]

Allen, D

B. Allen, D. Agarwal, J. D. Romano, and S. Valtolina, Source anisotropies and pulsar timing arrays, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2406.16031 (2024), arXiv:2406.16031 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

Grimm, M

N. Grimm, M. Pijnenburg, G. Cusin, and C. Bon- vin, The impact of large-scale galaxy clustering on the variance of the Hellings-Downs correlation, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2404.05670 (2024), arXiv:2404.05670 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

Grimm, M

N. Grimm, M. Pijnenburg, G. Cusin, and C. Bon- vin, The impact of large-scale galaxy clustering on the variance of the Hellings-Downs correlation: numeri- cal results, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.08744 (2024), arXiv:2411.08744 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Wahlquist, The Doppler response to gravitational waves from a binary star source., General Relativity and Gravitation19, 1101 (1987)

H. Wahlquist, The Doppler response to gravitational waves from a binary star source., General Relativity and Gravitation19, 1101 (1987)

work page 1987
[51]

J. A. Ellis, X. Siemens, and J. D. E. Creighton, Opti- mal Strategies for Continuous Gravitational Wave De- tection in Pulsar Timing Arrays, ApJ756, 175 (2012), arXiv:1204.4218 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[52]

B. S. Sathyaprakash and B. F. Schutz, Physics, Astro- physics and Cosmology with Gravitational Waves, Liv- ing Reviews in Relativity12, 2 (2009), arXiv:0903.0338 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[53]

P. C. Peters, Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses, Physical Review136, 1224 (1964)

work page 1964
[54]

Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 2: Astro- physics and Cosmology(2018)

M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 2: Astro- physics and Cosmology(2018)

work page 2018
[55]

S. R. Taylor, The Nanohertz Gravitational Wave As- tronomer, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2105.13270 (2021), arXiv:2105.13270 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[56]

J. D. Romano and B. Allen, Answers to frequently asked questions about the pulsar timing array Hellings and Downs curve, Classical and Quantum Gravity41, 175008 (2024), arXiv:2308.05847 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

Optimal strategies for gravitational wave stochastic background searches in pulsar timing data

M. Anholm, S. Ballmer, J. D. E. Creighton, L. R. Price, and X. Siemens, Optimal strategies for gravitational wave stochastic background searches in pulsar timing data, Phys. Rev. D79, 084030 (2009), arXiv:0809.0701 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[58]

C. M. F. Mingarelli, T. Sidery, I. Mandel, and A. Vecchio, Characterizing gravitational wave stochas- tic background anisotropy with pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D88, 062005 (2013), arXiv:1306.5394 [astro- ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[59]

J. Gair, J. D. Romano, S. Taylor, and C. M. F. Min- garelli, Mapping gravitational-wave backgrounds us- ing methods from CMB analysis: Application to pul- sar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D90, 082001 (2014), arXiv:1406.4664 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[60]

F. A. Jenet and J. D. Romano, Understanding the gravitational-wave Hellings and Downs curve for pulsar timing arrays in terms of sound and electromagnetic waves, American Journal of Physics83, 635 (2015), arXiv:1412.1142 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[61]

S. W. Ballmer, A radiometer for stochastic gravitational waves, Classical and Quantum Gravity23, S179 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0510096 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[62]

Gravitational wave radiometry: Mapping a stochastic gravitational wave background

S. Mitra, S. Dhurandhar, T. Souradeep, A. Lazzarini, V. Mandic, S. Bose, and S. Ballmer, Gravitational wave radiometry: Mapping a stochastic gravitational wave background, Phys. Rev. D77, 042002 (2008), arXiv:0708.2728 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[63]

Probing the anisotropies of a stochastic gravitational-wave background using a network of ground-based laser interferometers

E. Thrane, S. Ballmer, J. D. Romano, S. Mi- tra, D. Talukder, S. Bose, and V. Mandic, Prob- ing the anisotropies of a stochastic gravitational-wave background using a network of ground-based laser interferometers, Phys. Rev. D80, 122002 (2009), arXiv:0910.0858 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[64]

Agazie, A

G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Ar- zoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B´ ecsy, L. Blecha, A. Bra- zier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, J. A. Casey-Clyde, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, T. Cohen, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromartie, K. Crowter, M. E. DeCesar, P. B. Demorest, T. Dolch, B. Drach- ler, E. C. Ferrara, W. Fiore, E. Fo...

work page arXiv 2023
[65]

S. R. Taylor, L. Lentati, S. Babak, P. Brem, J. R. Gair, A. Sesana, and A. Vecchio, All correlations must die: Assessing the significance of a stochastic gravitational- wave background in pulsar timing arrays, Phys. Rev. D 95, 042002 (2017), arXiv:1606.09180 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[66]

Hyper-efficient model-independent Bayesian method for the analysis of pulsar timing data

L. Lentati, P. Alexander, M. P. Hobson, S. Taylor, J. Gair, S. T. Balan, and R. van Haasteren, Hyper- efficient model-independent Bayesian method for the analysis of pulsar timing data, Phys. Rev. D87, 104021 (2013), arXiv:1210.3578 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[67]

Understanding and analysing time-correlated stochastic signals in pulsar timing

R. van Haasteren and Y. Levin, Understanding and analysing time-correlated stochastic signals in pulsar timing, MNRAS428, 1147 (2013), arXiv:1202.5932 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[68]

Arzoumanian, P

Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, H. Blumer, B. B´ ecsy, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, S. Chatter- jee, S. Chen, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Craw- ford, H. T. Cromartie, M. E. Decesar, P. B. Demorest, T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, E. C. Ferrara, W. Fiore, E. Fon- seca, N. Garver-Daniels, P. A. Gentile, D. C. Good, J. S. Hazboun, A. M. Holgado, K. Isl...

work page arXiv 2020
[69]

W. K. Hastings, Monte Carlo Sampling Methods using Markov Chains and their Applications, Biometrika57, 97 (1970)

work page 1970
[70]

Hourihane, P

S. Hourihane, P. Meyers, A. Johnson, K. Chatziioan- nou, and M. Vallisneri, Accurate characterization of the stochastic gravitational-wave background with pulsar timing arrays by likelihood reweighting, Phys. Rev. D 107, 084045 (2023), arXiv:2212.06276 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[71]

J. A. Ellis, M. Vallisneri, S. R. Taylor, and P. T. Baker, ENTERPRISE: Enhanced Numerical Toolbox Enabling a Robust PulsaR Inference SuitE, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1912.015 (2019)

work page 1912
[72]

S. R. Taylor, P. T. Baker, J. S. Hazboun, J. Simon, and S. J. Vigeland, enterprise extensions (2021), v2.4.3

work page 2021
[73]

Ellis and R

J. Ellis and R. van Haasteren, jellis18/ptmcmcsampler: Official release (2017)

work page 2017
[74]

J. M. Dickey, The weighted likelihood ratio, linear hy- potheses on normal location parameters, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , 204 (1971)

work page 1971
[75]

N. S. Pol, S. R. Taylor, L. Z. Kelley, S. J. Vigeland, J. Si- mon, S. Chen, Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B´ ecsy, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, S. Chatter- jee, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. Thank- ful Cromartie, M. E. Decesar, P. B. Demorest, T. Dolch, E. C. Ferrara, W. Fiore, E. Fonseca, N. Garver-Daniels, D. C. Good, J. S...

work page arXiv 2021
[76]

M. F. Alam, Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, H. Blumer, K. E. Bohler, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke- Spolaor, K. Caballero, R. S. Camuccio, R. L. Cham- berlain, S. Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromartie, M. E. Decesar, P. B. Demorest, T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, R. D. Ferdman, E. C. Ferrara, W. Fiore, E. Fonseca, Y. Garcia, N. Ga...

work page arXiv 2021
[77]

Agazie, M

G. Agazie, M. F. Alam, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, L. Blecha, V. Bonidie, A. Brazier, P. R. Brook, S. Burke-Spolaor, B. B´ ecsy, C. Chapman, M. Charisi, S. Chatterjee, T. Cohen, J. M. Cordes, N. J. Cornish, F. Crawford, H. T. Cromartie, K. Crowter, M. E. Decesar, P. B. De- morest, T. Dolch, B. Drachler, E. C. Ferrara, W....

work page arXiv 2023
[78]

A. Zic, D. J. Reardon, A. Kapur, G. Hobbs, R. Mandow, M. Cury lo, R. M. Shannon, J. Askew, M. Bailes, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Cameron, Z.-C. Chen, S. Dai, V. Di Marco, Y. Feng, M. Kerr, A. Kulkarni, M. E. Lower, R. Luo, R. N. Manchester, M. T. Miles, R. S. Nathan, S. Os lowski, A. F. Rogers, C. J. Russell, R. Spiewak, N. Thyagarajan, L. Toomey, S. Wang, L. Zhan...

work page arXiv 2023
[79]

Antoniadis, S

J. Antoniadis, S. Babak, A. S. Bak Nielsen, C. G. Bassa, A. Berthereau, M. Bonetti, E. Bortolas, P. R. Brook, M. Burgay, R. N. Caballero, A. Chalumeau, D. J. Champion, S. Chanlaridis, S. Chen, I. Cognard, G. Desvignes, M. Falxa, R. D. Ferdman, A. Fran- chini, J. R. Gair, B. Goncharov, E. Graikou, J. M. Grießmeier, L. Guillemot, Y. J. Guo, H. Hu, F. Iraci,...

work page arXiv 2023
[80]

M. T. Miles, R. M. Shannon, M. Bailes, D. J. Rear- don, M. J. Keith, A. D. Cameron, A. Parthasarathy, M. Shamohammadi, R. Spiewak, W. van Straten, S. Buchner, F. Camilo, M. Geyer, A. Karastergiou, M. Kramer, M. Serylak, G. Theureau, and V. Venka- traman Krishnan, The MeerKAT Pulsar Timing Ar- ray: first data release, MNRAS519, 3976 (2023), arXiv:2212.0464...

work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.