pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.10708 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-12 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Multimodal axion emissions from Abelian-Higgs cosmic strings

Naoya Kitajima , Michiru Uwabo-Niibo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 07:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords axionscosmic stringsdark matterdark radiationAbelian-Higgs modellattice simulationsstring reconnectionsrelic density
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Axions produced from Abelian-Higgs cosmic strings can match the dark matter relic density for GeV-scale masses while generating observable dark radiation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that axions arise from the dynamics of cosmic strings through their coupling to gauge fields. Strong magnetic fields trapped inside the strings induce electric fields around moving segments, triggering axion emission during reconnections and at propagating kinks. Large-scale lattice simulations of entire string networks show emissions occurring in two distinct energy ranges: lower-energy axions that behave as cold dark matter and higher-energy axions that act as dark radiation. For axion masses at or above the GeV scale, the low-energy component reproduces the observed dark matter abundance, while the high-energy component yields a dark radiation density large enough to be tested by upcoming cosmological observations.

Core claim

Numerical simulations of string collisions demonstrate that a sizable number of axions are produced at the moment of reconnection, with additional emissions continuing from moving kinks. Large-scale lattice simulations of the full string network reveal multimodal axion production, with separate contributions in the low-energy regime that can constitute cold dark matter and the high-energy regime that constitutes dark radiation. The analysis concludes that an axion with mass of GeV or heavier simultaneously accounts for the present dark matter density and predicts a measurable dark radiation signal.

What carries the argument

The axion-gauge coupling, which converts the electric fields induced around moving cosmic strings into axion radiation while magnetic flux remains confined inside the strings.

If this is right

  • Low-energy axions from the string network contribute to the cold dark matter density.
  • High-energy axions from the same network contribute to dark radiation.
  • Axions heavier than or equal to 1 GeV can simultaneously saturate the observed dark matter abundance.
  • The accompanying dark radiation component reaches levels accessible to next-generation cosmological probes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism ties the evolution of cosmic string networks directly to two distinct cosmological observables that can be measured independently.
  • Adjusting the string tension or the axion coupling strength could shift the division between the dark matter and dark radiation components.
  • If confirmed, the scenario would provide a new way to constrain the formation epoch or tension of cosmic strings through combined dark matter and dark radiation data.

Load-bearing premise

The axion coupling to the gauge fields must be strong enough, and the lattice model must correctly represent string reconnections and kink motion, to produce the reported amounts of axions in each energy range.

What would settle it

Future measurements of the dark radiation density that find no excess at the level expected from GeV-mass axions emitted by cosmic strings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.10708 by Michiru Uwabo-Niibo, Naoya Kitajima.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Snapshots of the collision and reconnection of two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Time evolution of the number density spectrum of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: presents the contours of Ω(DM) a h 2 = ΩDMh 2 ≃ 0.12 [62], above which the axion DM is overpro￾duced. The gray-shaded region and the green horizontal lines represent the constraints from the GW observation, v ≤ 1014 GeV [63], and the DR abundance (see below) respectively. This result shows that low-energy axions with mass ≳ 0.1 GeV produced from the Abelian-Higgs string network can explain the relic DM abu… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dependence of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that axions can be produced from Abelian-Higgs cosmic strings due to the axion-gauge coupling. The strong magnetic field is confined in the string, and the electric field is induced around the moving string, allowing axion productions from the dynamics of cosmic strings. Our numerical analysis on the string collision shows that a sizable number of axions can be produced at the reconnection, and further emissions occur from moving kinks afterward. Large-scale lattice simulations of the string network further reveal multimodal axion emissions in the sense that axions are produced in both the low-energy and high-energy regimes. The former can contribute to the cold dark matter and the latter can be regarded as dark radiation. We found that the axion with GeV or heavier mass can explain the current relic dark matter abundance and simultaneously predicts a sizable amount of dark radiation which can be probed by future observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that axions are produced from Abelian-Higgs cosmic strings via the axion-gauge coupling, with string collisions and moving kinks generating a sizable number of axions. Large-scale lattice simulations of the string network reveal multimodal emissions: low-energy axions that can contribute to cold dark matter and high-energy axions that act as dark radiation. For axion masses of GeV or heavier, the mechanism is reported to saturate the observed relic dark matter density while predicting a detectable amount of dark radiation.

Significance. If the reported spectra and relic-density normalizations survive continuum extrapolation, the work would identify a new string-based production channel for axions that simultaneously addresses the dark-matter abundance and yields observable dark radiation, providing a concrete link between cosmic-string dynamics and upcoming cosmological probes.

major comments (2)
  1. Numerical analysis on string collision and large-scale lattice simulations: the multimodal spectrum and the extracted relic densities for GeV-scale axions rest on the assumption that the discretized equations of motion accurately capture kink propagation and reconnection without artificial dispersion. No resolution scan or continuum extrapolation holding the physical core width fixed is described, so the high-energy tail used for the dark-radiation prediction may be distorted by lattice-spacing effects.
  2. Relic-density extraction from the spectra: the claim that GeV or heavier axions explain the current dark-matter abundance depends on the normalization of the low-energy peak; without reported checks that this peak remains stable under grid refinement, the quantitative match to the observed density is not yet demonstrated to be robust.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from an explicit statement of the axion-gauge coupling strength and the range of string tensions explored in the simulations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on the numerical aspects of our work. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical analysis on string collision and large-scale lattice simulations: the multimodal spectrum and the extracted relic densities for GeV-scale axions rest on the assumption that the discretized equations of motion accurately capture kink propagation and reconnection without artificial dispersion. No resolution scan or continuum extrapolation holding the physical core width fixed is described, so the high-energy tail used for the dark-radiation prediction may be distorted by lattice-spacing effects.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating robustness against lattice artifacts is essential for the high-energy tail of the axion spectrum. Our simulations use a lattice spacing chosen to be substantially smaller than the physical string core width set by the model parameters, following standard practices in Abelian-Higgs string network studies. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that an explicit resolution scan with fixed physical core width was not included. In the revised manuscript we will add results from additional runs at higher resolutions and discuss the stability of the high-energy tail under these refinements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Relic-density extraction from the spectra: the claim that GeV or heavier axions explain the current dark-matter abundance depends on the normalization of the low-energy peak; without reported checks that this peak remains stable under grid refinement, the quantitative match to the observed density is not yet demonstrated to be robust.

    Authors: We concur that stability of the low-energy peak normalization under grid refinement is necessary to support the quantitative relic-density claim. The low-energy axions are generated by the large-scale network dynamics, which we have checked for volume scaling. To strengthen this, the revised version will incorporate explicit grid-refinement tests confirming that the low-energy peak remains stable, thereby supporting the conclusion that GeV-scale axions can saturate the observed dark-matter density. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: results from direct lattice simulation of string dynamics

full rationale

The paper reports axion production spectra obtained from numerical evolution of the Abelian-Higgs lattice equations with axion-gauge coupling. No analytic derivation is presented that reduces a claimed prediction back to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain. The multimodal spectrum, relic-density normalization, and dark-radiation estimate are direct outputs of the discretized field equations rather than quantities defined in terms of themselves. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central numerical claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Limited information available from abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1128 out tokens · 25094 ms · 2026-05-18T07:28:13.291385+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev.D16, 1791 (1977)

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  4. [4]

    Instantons and Spin Forces between Massive Quarks

    F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, JHEP06, 051 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell, and A. Ringwald, JHEP10, 146 (2012), arXiv:1206.0819 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B 120, 127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  9. [9]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B120, 133 (1983)

    work page 1983

  10. [10]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, Phys. Lett. B120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  11. [11]

    R. L. Davis, Phys. Lett. B180, 225 (1986)

    work page 1986

  12. [12]

    D. H. Lyth, Phys. Lett. B275, 279 (1992)

    work page 1992

  13. [13]

    Axions : Theory and Cosmological Role

    M. Kawasaki and K. Nakayama, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63, 69 (2013), arXiv:1301.1123 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rept.643, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, Phys. Rept.870, 1 (2020), arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    K. Choi, S. H. Im, and C. Sub Shin, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71, 225 (2021), arXiv:2012.05029 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, PoSCOSMICWISPers, 040 (2024), arXiv:2403.17697 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    T. W. B. Kibble, J. Phys. A9, 1387 (1976)

    work page 1976

  19. [19]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects(Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Nucl. Phys. B252, 227 (1985), [Erra- tum: Nucl.Phys.B 261, 750 (1985)]

    work page 1985

  21. [21]

    D. P. Bennett, Phys. Rev. D33, 872 (1986), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 34, 3932 (1986)]

    work page 1986

  22. [22]

    D. P. Bennett, Phys. Rev. D34, 3592 (1986)

    work page 1986

  23. [23]

    D. P. Bennett and F. R. Bouchet, Phys. Rev. D41, 2408 (1990)

    work page 1990

  24. [24]

    Allen and E

    B. Allen and E. P. S. Shellard, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 119 (1990)

    work page 1990

  25. [25]

    Vilenkin, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Phys. Lett. B107, 47 (1981)

    work page 1981

  26. [26]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D31, 3052 (1985)

    work page 1985

  27. [27]

    Vilenkin and T

    A. Vilenkin and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D35, 1138 (1987)

    work page 1987

  28. [28]

    Garfinkle and T

    D. Garfinkle and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D36, 2229 (1987)

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    A. J. Long and L.-T. Wang, Phys. Rev. D99, 063529 (2019), arXiv:1901.03312 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Kitajima and K

    N. Kitajima and K. Nakayama, JHEP08, 068 (2023), arXiv:2212.13573 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    Kitajima and K

    N. Kitajima and K. Nakayama, Phys. Lett. B846, 138213 (2023), arXiv:2306.17390 [hep-ph]. 6

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey, and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D97, 123505 (2018), arXiv:1711.03104 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 163001 (2018), arXiv:1801.04268 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Auclair et al., Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA , JCAP 04 (2020) 034 [ 1909.00819]

    P. Auclairet al., JCAP04, 034 (2020), arXiv:1909.00819 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Evolution of Axionic Strings and Spectrum of Axions Radiated from Them

    M. Yamaguchi, M. Kawasaki, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4578 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9811311

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  36. [36]

    Axion Radiation from Strings

    C. Hagmann, S. Chang, and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. D 63, 125018 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0012361

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  37. [37]

    Improved estimation of radiated axions from cosmological axionic strings

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yam- aguchi, and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. D83, 123531 (2011), arXiv:1012.5502 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    Axion dark matter: strings and their cores

    L. Fleury and G. D. Moore, JCAP01, 004 (2016), arXiv:1509.00026 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Axions from Strings: the Attractive Solution

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, JHEP07, 151 (2018), arXiv:1806.04677 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Kawasaki, T

    M. Kawasaki, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama, PTEP2018, 091E01 (2018), arXiv:1806.05566 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    C. J. A. P. Martins, Phys. Lett. B788, 147 (2019), arXiv:1811.12678 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Buschmann, J.W

    M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, and B. R. Safdi, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 161103 (2020), arXiv:1906.00967 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Hindmarsh, J

    M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, and J. Urrestilla, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 021301 (2020), arXiv:1908.03522 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Gorghetto, E

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, and G. Villadoro, SciPost Phys. 10, 050 (2021), arXiv:2007.04990 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Hindmarsh, J

    M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez-Eiguren, and J. Urrestilla, Phys. Rev. D103, 103534 (2021), arXiv:2102.07723 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Buschmann, J.W

    M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D. E. Willcox, W. Zhang, and B. R. Safdi, Nature Com- mun.13, 1049 (2022), arXiv:2108.05368 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    J. N. Benabou, M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, and B. R. Safdi, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 241003 (2025), arXiv:2412.08699 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Saikawa, J

    K. Saikawa, J. Redondo, A. Vaquero, and M. Kaltschmidt, JCAP10, 043 (2024), arXiv:2401.17253 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Kim and M

    H. Kim and M. Son, JHEP07, 052 (2025), arXiv:2411.08455 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Correia, M

    J. Correia, M. Hindmarsh, J. Lizarraga, A. Lopez- Eiguren, K. Rummukainen, and J. Urrestilla, Phys. Rev. D111, 063532 (2025), arXiv:2410.18064 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Sikivie, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1415 (1983), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    work page 1983

  52. [52]

    Sikivie, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. D32, 2988 (1985), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 36, 974 (1987)]

    work page 1985

  53. [53]

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102, 89 (2018), arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Kitajima, S

    N. Kitajima, S. Nakagawa, and F. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D105, 103011 (2022), arXiv:2111.06696 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Nakagawa, F

    S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063016 (2023), arXiv:2209.01107 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Kitajima and S

    N. Kitajima and S. Nakagawa, (2025), arXiv:2507.16720 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    K. J. M. Moriarty, E. Myers, and C. Rebbi, Phys. Lett. B207, 411 (1988)

    work page 1988

  58. [58]

    E. P. S. Shellard, Nucl. Phys. B283, 624 (1987)

    work page 1987

  59. [59]

    Decay of Cosmic String Loops Due to Particle Radiation

    D. Matsunami, L. Pogosian, A. Saurabh, and T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201301 (2019), arXiv:1903.05102 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Lilley, and D. Yamauchi, JCAP06, 030 (2024), arXiv:2312.16091 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Kanda and N

    Y. Kanda and N. Kitajima, (2025), arXiv:2510.07894 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Tristram et al., Cosmological parameters derived from the final Planck data release (PR4), Astron

    M. Tristramet al., Astron. Astrophys.682, A37 (2024), arXiv:2309.10034 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    D. G. Figueroa, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and P. Simakachorn, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 171002 (2024), arXiv:2307.02399 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Updated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Parameter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark Energy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hubble Tension

    S. Roy Choudhury and T. Okumura, Astrophys. J. Lett. 976, L11 (2024), arXiv:2409.13022 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    Constraints on dark radiation from cosmological probes

    G. Rossi, C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, and J. Lesgourgues, Phys. Rev. D92, 063505 (2015), arXiv:1412.6763 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    Watanabe, (2025), arXiv:2510.05630 [hep-ph]

    Y. Watanabe, (2025), arXiv:2510.05630 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025