Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The paper argues that the second law of thermodynamics should be sign(T) dS ≥ 0, so entropy can decrease at negative absolute temperature.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 09:00 UTC pith:KUNO3WZI

load-bearing objection The paper's central extension sign(T)dS≥0 is asserted, not derived, and as a statement about isolated non-equilibrium systems it is false; the LQC application is a repackaging of a GSL sign flip. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.17560 v2 pith:KUNO3WZI submitted 2025-10-20 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP

An Extended Second Law of Thermodynamics

Alejandro Corichi , Omar Gallegos This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords extended second lawnegative absolute temperatureentropythermodynamicsloop quantum cosmologyOnsager vorticesarrow of timebounded phase space
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors set out to extend the second law of thermodynamics so that it also holds for systems with negative absolute temperature. They propose the inequality sign(T) dS ≥ 0, which contains the usual requirement dS ≥ 0 whenever T > 0 and instead permits entropy to decrease when T < 0. The physical basis is that isolated systems with bounded phase space can possess a threshold energy above which temperature is negative, and in those regimes an entropy decrease has been reported. The paper demonstrates the extended law in two concrete settings: loop quantum cosmology near the bounce, where the generalized second law is otherwise violated, and Onsager's bounded point-vortex system. If the proposal is correct, the arrow of time becomes temperature-dependent rather than universally positive.

Core claim

The central claim is that the conventional second law is the positive-temperature case of a more general inequality, sign(T) dS ≥ 0. With the statistical (Boltzmann) temperature 1/T = (∂S/∂E)_X, a bounded phase space produces a threshold energy E*; below E* temperature is positive, above it temperature is negative, and in the negative-temperature region the standard second law can be violated. The authors show that in loop quantum cosmology the temperature assigned to the apparent horizon via T = κ/2π changes sign where Ḣ + 2H² crosses zero, and that the region ρc/2 < ρ < ρc (near the bounce) has T < 0 together with Ṡ_tot < 0, so the extended law restores validity there. The same inequality

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the extended second law inequality sign(T) dS ≥ 0, combined with the statistical definition of temperature 1/T = (∂S/∂E)_X. The inequality is the mechanism: it replaces the unconditional statement 'entropy does not decrease' with a statement about the product of the sign of temperature and the entropy change. The physical setup that makes negative temperatures possible is a bounded phase space, which gives a threshold energy E* and lets the temperature pass through infinity and become negative. In the cosmological application, the temperature is assigned to the apparent horizon by surface gravity, T = κ/2π, and its sign is governed by the sign of Ḣ + 2H²; the entro

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the entropy decrease found near the loop-quantum-cosmology bounce is a genuine physical process that the second law must accommodate, rather than an artifact of assigning a horizon temperature that can be negative, and that the sign of T should determine the allowed sign of dS.

What would settle it

Prepare an isolated nuclear-spin system at a well-controlled negative absolute temperature and monitor its entropy: the extended law predicts dS ≤ 0 in that regime, while the standard law predicts dS ≥ 0, so observing an increase in entropy while T < 0 would refute the proposal.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For every ordinary positive-temperature isolated system, the extended law reduces exactly to the standard second law, so the conventional thermodynamic arrow of time is unchanged.
  • For isolated negative-temperature systems, a decrease in entropy is thermodynamically admissible, resolving apparent violations reported in vortex and spin systems.
  • In loop quantum cosmology, the generalized second law is preserved all the way to the bounce once the sign of the horizon temperature is included, extending its validity from 0 < ρ < ρc/2 to 0 < ρ < ρc.
  • The sign change of temperature is interpreted as a phase transition, giving the near-bounce universe a thermodynamic description.
  • The inequality offers a template for testing other negative-temperature systems: wherever T < 0, the extended law predicts dS ≤ 0, which is a directly measurable distinction from the standard law.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the extended law is adopted, the arrow of time becomes dependent on the thermodynamic state: the same physical process could show entropy increasing when T > 0 and decreasing when T < 0, which the authors gesture at but do not explore.
  • The LQC application hinges on assigning a temperature to the apparent horizon via surface gravity; using a different temperature assignment or a different entropy definition could shift or eliminate the negative-temperature region, so the extension is directly testable at the level of those definitions.
  • A natural next step, not developed in the paper, is to derive sign(T) dS ≥ 0 from a microphysical entropy production argument, rather than postulating it; such a derivation would clarify whether the inequality is a fundamental law or an effective one.
  • For two isolated systems at different signs of temperature that are brought into contact, the extended law combined with the rule that heat flows from hotter to colder would suggest a composite arrow governed by the final positive equilibrium temperature; this consequence is not spelled out in the paper.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an 'extended second law' (ESL), Eq. (2), sign(T) dS >= 0, intended to include negative absolute temperature (NAT) systems by recovering the standard dS >= 0 when T > 0 and allowing dS <= 0 when T < 0. The paper applies this proposal to loop quantum cosmology (LQC), where the generalized second law is claimed to be violated near the bounce, and to Onsager point vortices. The manuscript is short and largely qualitative: Eq. (2) is stated as a postulate, and the two applications are described without quantitative verification.

Significance. If the ESL were established, it would provide a compact statement unifying the thermodynamics of positive- and negative-temperature systems and would reinterpret apparent second-law violations in LQC as legitimate NAT behavior. However, the paper does not derive Eq. (2) from statistical mechanics, does not specify the class of processes to which it applies, and the proposed inequality appears to conflict with microcanonical entropy increase for isolated NAT systems. The LQC and Onsager discussions are not independent tests of the proposal. The manuscript's strength is its clear presentation of the question and its honest acknowledgment that the interpretation of negative temperature remains unsettled, but the central claim is currently unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (2), Introduction] The ESL is asserted, not derived. For a bounded-spectrum system at fixed energy E > E*, the microcanonical temperature satisfies T = 1/(∂S/∂E) < 0. A non-equilibrium microstate at the same E evolves toward the equilibrium macrostate with dS > 0. Hence sign(T) dS < 0 for this irreversible process, contradicting Eq. (2). The inequality can only hold if restricted to reversible or quasi-static changes, in which case it reduces to a first-law identity and loses second-law content. This is a load-bearing flaw in the central claim.
  2. [Section I, Eqs. (3)–(8)] The LQC application is not quantitatively demonstrated. Equations (3)–(4) are taken from the authors' earlier work [5], and the text only states that the generalized second law is violated near the bounce. No explicit computation is shown that sign(T) dS_tot >= 0 in the claimed region ρc/2 < ρ < ρc. Moreover, assigning T = κ/2π to the apparent horizon in Eq. (7) is an assumption; a negative total entropy flux in this region could equally indicate that the horizon-temperature assignment breaks down, rather than that the second law should be reformulated. Thus the argument is circular: the ESL is validated by a calculation that itself presupposes the validity of the horizon-temperature assignment and the meaning of S_m.
  3. [Section II, Onsager's vortices] The Onsager-vortex section is a summary of known results and provides no new test of the ESL. It asserts that 'the ESL can also be applied to extend the validity domain' because the standard second law is violated at E > E_M, but it does not derive or numerically verify sign(T) dS >= 0 for any vortex configuration. Without an explicit check, this example does not support Eq. (2).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, threshold scenarios] The three threshold scenarios contain a typo: the third case should read E > E*, T < 0, not 'E < E*, T < 0', given the preceding discussion of E* as the energy at which T → ±∞.
  2. [Eq. (4)] The expression for S_m has two equalities; the second equality should be derived explicitly or explained to avoid ambiguity. Also, all symbols (e.g., α, ρc) should be defined at first use.
  3. [Throughout] The statement in the Introduction that 'Some of these examples have experimentally confirmed the negative absolute temperature and dS < 0 in the same regime' is made without a specific citation at that point; please provide a reference or qualify the claim.
  4. [Conclusions] The phrase 'we have proposed an extension' is appropriate and honest, but it confirms that Eq. (2) has postulate status. The conclusions would benefit from a clear statement of the intended domain of applicability (e.g., quasi-static processes) if that is what is intended.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

The ESL sign(T)dS≥0 is defined to match the already-known T<0, dS<0 examples; the LQC 'violation' it legitimizes comes from the authors' own prior paper, so the central application is not an independent test.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Introduction (Eq. 2) and Section I (LQC application)]
    "Here we put forward an extended second law (ESL) of thermodynamics that is valid also for NAT systems, which can be read as sign(T) dS≥0 ... The standard analysis of the second law in cosmology does not include the possibility of NAT, where the GSL is violated close to the quantum bounce in almost all cases ... Since this system admits NAT and the ESL is written as in (2), the validity domain of the second law of thermodynamics can be extended in LQC not only for the cases where T>0 holds, but also for the cases where NAT is present."

    Eq. (2) is not derived from Eq. (1) or from a microscopic model; it is an inequality that by construction permits negative dS whenever T<0. The LQC application takes the already-claimed GSL violation (negative entropy change in the ρc/2<ρ<ρc region, where T<0) and notes that it satisfies sign(T)dS≥0. That is a restatement of the definition of the ESL, not a derived consequence, so the 'extension' is forced by the form of the proposed law.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Introduction, paragraph listing NAT systems and motivating consistency check]
    "Some of these examples have experimentally confirmed the negative absolute temperature and dS <0 in the same regime. ... We will apply the ESL to a model in loop quantum cosmology, as well as the Onsager’s vortices to show the consistency within these examples."

    The empirical facts that motivated Eq. (2) are exactly the cases where T<0 and dS<0. 'Applying' the ESL to Onsager vortices (S= kB lnω(E), dS<0 at E>E_M) and to LQC and finding that sign(T)dS≥0 holds is therefore an exercise of the rule's own definition rather than an independent prediction. The posterior consistency check does not add support because no system with T<0 and dS>0, or any other out-of-sample case, is used to test the law.

  3. self citation load bearing [Section I, paragraph after Eq. (8); refs. [5] and [32]]
    "The standard analysis of the second law in cosmology does not include the possibility of NAT, where the GSL is violated close to the quantum bounce in almost all cases (See more details in [5, 32])."

    The concrete premise used in the LQC application — that the GSL is violated near the bounce and that the effective LQC phase space admits NAT — is attributed to [5], the authors' own prior arXiv paper (Corichi & Gallegos, Entropy in Loop Quantum Cosmology), and to [32]. This cited result is not machine-checked, code-reproduced, or independently derived here, so the load-bearing input for the ESL's only gravitational example is a self-citation. The ESL is then calibrated to accommodate this self-supplied calculation, making the example circular as support for the law.

full rationale

The manuscript presents Eq. (2), sign(T)dS≥0, as a proposed axiom without deriving it from the temperature definition (1) or from any statistical-mechanical model. In itself this is a legitimate proposal, but the paper goes on to say that the ESL 'extends the regimen of validity' and to 'show consistency' in systems where the standard second law is violated. Those systems are the same ones used to motivate the extension: the list in the Introduction explicitly includes 'negative absolute temperature and dS<0 in the same regime,' and the LQC example is a region (ρc/2<ρ<ρc) where the paper itself states the GSL is violated and T<0. Thus the 'prediction' that the ESL holds there is equivalent to the definition of sign(T)dS≥0. Moreover, the existence of the LQC violation that the ESL legitimizes is carried by the authors' own prior work [5], so the gravitational application rests on a self-citation chain rather than on an external, machine-checked, or independently reproduced derivation. The paper is candid that it is proposing a formulation and that the interpretation of negative temperature remains unsettled, which keeps this from being a fully fabricated result; nevertheless, the central claim's concrete support reduces by construction to its own definition and to a same-author citation. No independent test, out-of-sample example, or external benchmark is supplied, so the appropriate circularity score is 7.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or entities. It relies on a stack of prior assumptions: the standard temperature definition, LQC effective dynamics, specific entropy formulas, and the postulate of the ESL. The ESL is the only ad hoc addition, and it is not derived from any underlying principle.

axioms (5)
  • standard math Boltzmann temperature definition: 1/T = ∂S/∂E at fixed X (Eq. 1).
    Used to define temperature for both positive and negative values. Standard in statistical mechanics.
  • domain assumption LQC effective Friedmann equations: H^2 = (8π/3)ρ(1−ρ/ρc) and ˙H = −4π(P+ρ)(1−2ρ/ρc) (Eqs. 5–6).
    Taken from loop quantum cosmology literature; the paper does not derive these.
  • domain assumption Entropy expressions for gravitational and matter parts in LQC, Eqs. (3)–(4), including logarithmic correction with parameter α.
    Borrowed from prior work, including the authors' own paper [5]. These are model-dependent.
  • ad hoc to paper The extended second law: sign(T) dS ≥ 0.
    Stated as a postulate without derivation; its motivation comes from the examples themselves, making it circular.
  • domain assumption Negative-temperature systems are perfectly isolated and have bounded phase space.
    Invoked to justify NAT conditions; follows from cited reviews, not demonstrated here.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 5661 in / 10794 out tokens · 88215 ms · 2026-08-04T09:00:07.331374+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The second law of thermodynamics constitutes a fundamental principle of physics, precluding the existence of perpetual motion machines and providing a natural definition of the arrow of time. Its scope extends across virtually all areas of physical theory. Nonetheless, certain systems are known to admit negative absolute temperatures under well-defined conditions, a phenomenon that has been experimentally observed. In this work, we formulate an extended version of the first and second laws, which recovers the conventional statement for positive temperatures and extends its applicability to the negative-temperature domain. Illustrative examples are discussed in the contexts of quantum cosmology and Onsager's vortices.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Cosmology in Krylov Space: Complexity and Entropy

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    In a sharply peaked Gaussian state of a flat FLRW universe with a massless scalar clock, Krylov state complexity grows as σ²(φ−φ0)²/4 and operator complexity is exactly twice that, in both Wheeler-DeWitt and loop quan...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 17 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    N. F. Ramsey, Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechan- ics at Negative Absolute Temperatures, Phys. Rev.103, 20 (1956)

    1956

  2. [2]

    Baldovin, S

    M. Baldovin, S. Iubini, R. Livi, and A. Vulpiani, Sta- tistical mechanics of systems with negative temperature, Physics Reports923, 1 (2021), statistical mechanics of systems with negative temperature

    2021

  3. [3]

    negative temperature

    D. Montgomery and G. Joyce, Statistical mechanics of “negative temperature” states, Phys. Fluids17, 1139–1145 (1974)

    1974

  4. [4]

    Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics, Nuovo Cim6, 279–287 (1949)

    L. Onsager, Statistical hydrodynamics, Nuovo Cim6, 279–287 (1949)

    1949

  5. [5]

    Corichi and O

    A. Corichi and O. Gallegos, Entropy in Loop Quantum Cosmology, (2025), arXiv:2505.09055 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    A. S. Pierfrancesco Buonsante, Roberto Franzosi, On the dispute between boltzmann and gibbs entropy, Annals of Physics375, 414 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Eilbeck, P

    J. Eilbeck, P. Lomdahl, and A. Scott, The discrete self- trapping equation, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena16, 318 (1985)

    1985

  8. [8]

    P. G. Kevrekidis,The Discrete Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation:Mathematical Analysis, Numerical Computa- tions and Physical Perspectives(2009)

    2009

  9. [9]

    Puglisi, A

    A. Puglisi, A. Sarracino, and A. Vulpiani, Temperature in and out of equilibrium: A review of concepts, tools and attempts, Physics Reports709–710, 1 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Yatsuyanagi, Y

    Y. Yatsuyanagi, Y. Kiwamoto, H. Tomita, M. M. Sano, T. Yoshida, and T. Ebisuzaki, Dynamics of two-sign point vortices in positive and negative temperature states, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 054502 (2005)

    2005

  11. [11]

    A. J. Groszek, D. M. Paganin, K. Helmerson, and T. P. Simula, Motion of vortices in inhomogeneous bose- einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A97, 023617 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    Simula, M

    T. Simula, M. J. Davis, and K. Helmerson, Emergence of order from turbulence in an isolated planar superfluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 165302 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    Abragam and W

    A. Abragam and W. G. Proctor, Spin temperature, Phys. Rev.109, 1441 (1958)

    1958

  14. [14]

    A. S. Oja and O. V. Lounasmaa, Nuclear magnetic order- ing in simple metals at positive and negative nanokelvin temperatures, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 1 (1997)

    1997

  15. [15]

    Vladimirova, S

    M. Vladimirova, S. Cronenberger, D. Scalbert, I. I. Ryzhov, V. S. Zapasskii, G. G. Kozlov, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, and K. V. Kavokin, Spin temperature concept verified by op- tical magnetometry of nuclear spins, Phys. Rev. B97, 041301 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    R. V. Pound, Nuclear spin relaxation times in single crys- tals of lif, Phys. Rev.81, 156 (1951)

    1951

  17. [17]

    E. M. Purcell and R. V. Pound, A nuclear spin system at negative temperature, Phys. Rev.81, 279 (1951)

    1951

  18. [18]

    D. L. Haycock, P. M. Alsing, I. H. Deutsch, J. Grondalski, and P. S. Jessen, Mesoscopic quantum coherence in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3365 (2000). 4

    2000

  19. [19]

    Fallani, J

    L. Fallani, J. E. Lye, V. Guarrera, C. Fort, and M. In- guscio, Ultracold atoms in a disordered crystal of light: Towards a bose glass, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 130404 (2007)

    2007

  20. [20]

    Jaksch, C

    D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J. I. Cirac, C. W. Gardiner, and P. Zoller, Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 3108 (1998)

    1998

  21. [21]

    A. P. Mosk, Atomic gases at negative kinetic tempera- ture, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 040403 (2005)

    2005

  22. [22]

    A. L. Schawlow and C. H. Townes, Infrared and optical masers, Phys. Rev.112, 1940 (1958)

    1940

  23. [23]

    Thiemann,Modern Canonical Quantum General Rela- tivity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    T. Thiemann,Modern Canonical Quantum General Rela- tivity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  24. [24]

    Rovelli,Quantum gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Univ

    C. Rovelli,Quantum gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Univ. Pr., Cambridge, UK, 2004)

    2004

  25. [25]

    Ashtekar, M

    A. Ashtekar, M. Bojowald, and J. Lewandowski, Math- ematical structure of loop quantum cosmology, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7, 233 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0304074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  26. [26]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Quantum Na- ture of the Big Bang: Improved dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 74, 084003 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    Ashtekar, A

    A. Ashtekar, A. Corichi, and P. Singh, Robustness of key features of loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D77, 024046 (2008), arXiv:0710.3565 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  28. [28]

    Bojowald, Absence of singularity in loop quantum cosmology, Phys

    M. Bojowald, Absence of singularity in loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5227 (2001), arXiv:gr- qc/0102069

    arXiv 2001

  29. [29]

    Assanioussi, A

    M. Assanioussi, A. Dapor, K. Liegener, and T. Paw lowski, Emergent de Sitter Epoch of the Quantum Cosmos from Loop Quantum Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 081303 (2018), arXiv:1801.00768 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Assanioussi, A

    M. Assanioussi, A. Dapor, K. Liegener, and T. Paw lowski, Emergent de Sitter epoch of the Loop Quantum Cosmos: a detailed analysis, Phys. Rev. D 100, 084003 (2019), arXiv:1906.05315 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    J. Yang, Y. Ding, and Y. Ma, Alternative quantization of the Hamiltonian in loop quantum cosmology II: In- cluding the Lorentz term, Phys. Lett. B682, 1 (2009), arXiv:0904.4379 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    H. M. Sadjadi, On solutions of loop quantum cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2571 (2013), arXiv:1205.1974 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [33]

    Li and J.-Y

    L.-F. Li and J.-Y. Zhu, Thermodynamics in Loop Quan- tum Cosmology, Adv. High Energy Phys.2009, 905705 (2009), arXiv:0812.3544 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  34. [34]

    Zhang, Thermodynamics in new model of loop quantum cosmology, Eur

    X. Zhang, Thermodynamics in new model of loop quantum cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 117 (2021), arXiv:2111.05660 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Ashtekar, J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, and K. Krasnov, Quan- tum geometry and black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 904 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9710007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    Ghosh and P

    A. Ghosh and P. Mitra, Counting black hole microscopic states in loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D74, 064026 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0605125

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [37]

    Ghosh and P

    A. Ghosh and P. Mitra, A Bound on the log correction to the black hole area law, Phys. Rev. D71, 027502 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0401070

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    K. A. Meissner, Black hole entropy in loop quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 5245 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0407052

    arXiv 2004

  39. [39]

    Engle, A

    J. Engle, A. Perez, and K. Noui, Black hole entropy and SU(2) Chern-Simons theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 031302 (2010), arXiv:0905.3168 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    S. A. Hayward, Unified first law of black hole dynamics and relativistic thermodynamics, Class. Quant. Grav.15, 3147 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9710089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  41. [41]

    S. A. Hayward, S. Mukohyama, and M. C. Ashworth, Dy- namic black hole entropy, Phys. Lett. A256, 347 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9810006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  42. [42]

    Cai and S

    R.-G. Cai and S. P. Kim, First law of thermodynam- ics and Friedmann equations of Friedmann-Robertson- Walker universe, JHEP02, 050, arXiv:hep-th/0501055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Faraoni,Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Hori- zons, Vol

    V. Faraoni,Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Hori- zons, Vol. 907 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    Gauthier, M

    G. Gauthier, M. T. Reeves, X. Yu, A. S. Bradley, M. A. Baker, T. A. Bell, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, M. J. Davis, and T. W. Neely, Giant vortex clusters in a two- dimensional quantum fluid, Science364, 1264 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    S. P. Johnstone, A. J. Groszek, P. T. Starkey, C. J. Billington, T. P. Simula, and K. Helmerson, Evolution of large-scale flow from turbulence in a two-dimensional superfluid, Science364, 1267 (2019)

    2019