arxiv: 2510.21976 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-th

Evidence of dynamical dark energy found via the DESI DR2 Lymanα forest

Salvatore Capozziello , Himanshu Chaudhary , G. Mustafa , S. K. J. Pacif This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 04:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th

keywords dynamical dark energyDESI DR2Lyman-alpha forestBAOQuintom-Bdark energy parameterizationscosmological constraints

0 comments

The pith

DESI DR2 Lyman-alpha forest measurements favor dynamical dark energy that crosses the phantom divide.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines DESI Data Release 2 Lyman-alpha forest baryon acoustic oscillation data with galaxy BAO, multiple Type Ia supernova catalogs, and cosmic microwave background likelihoods. It fits several explicit time-dependent forms for the dark energy equation of state and finds that every parameterization returns values with w0 above minus one, wa below zero, and their sum below minus one. This pattern corresponds to Quintom-B evolution in which the equation of state starts above the cosmological-constant value and later drops below it. The statistical preference over a pure cosmological constant reaches roughly 3.1 sigma for the Lyman-alpha plus CMB plus galaxy BAO combination and drops when supernovae are added. A sympathetic reader cares because the result suggests that the universe's current acceleration is not produced by a fixed energy density but by something that changes with time.

Core claim

Using Metropolis-Hastings MCMC sampling across Chevallier-Polarski-Linder, logarithmic, exponential, Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan, Barboza-Alcaniz, and generalized emergent dark-energy forms, together with the wCDM and non-flat extensions, the analysis of DESI DR2 Lyman-alpha forest BAO plus complementary probes yields w0 greater than minus one, wa less than zero, and w0 plus wa less than minus one in every case. This Quintom-B signature produces a moderate preference for dynamical dark energy, reaching up to 3.10 sigma relative to LambdaCDM for the Lyman-alpha plus CMB plus galaxy BAO data set, while Bayes factors show dataset-dependent evidence that weakens when supernova samples are included.

What carries the argument

Dark-energy equation-of-state parameterizations (CPL, logarithmic, exponential, JBP, BA, generalized emergent) fitted via MCMC to extract constraints and Bayesian evidence from the combined DESI Lyman-alpha forest, galaxy BAO, CMB, and supernova data.

If this is right

Non-flat extensions of both LambdaCDM and wCDM remain consistent with spatial flatness.
The degree of preference for dynamical dark energy depends strongly on which data sets are combined.
Inclusion of Pantheon+ or DES-Dovekie supernova samples reduces the deviation from LambdaCDM to less than or equal to 2 sigma.
Bayesian evidence favors wCDM and its non-flat version moderately for the Lyman-alpha plus CMB plus galaxy BAO combination and shows stronger support for o wCDM when certain supernova samples are added.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Confirmation would encourage development of theoretical models that naturally allow the equation of state to cross minus one from above to below.
Next-generation surveys with tighter Lyman-alpha forest measurements could test whether the different parameterizations converge on the same Quintom-B region or diverge.
An evolving dark energy component would alter long-term forecasts for the universe's expansion rate and ultimate fate.

Load-bearing premise

Any departure of dark energy from a constant value must be described by one of the chosen functional forms for its time evolution.

What would settle it

Future data that tightly constrain the dark energy equation of state to remain exactly equal to minus one at all measured redshifts would remove the reported preference for the dynamical models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.21976 by G. Mustafa, Himanshu Chaudhary, Salvatore Capozziello, S. K. J. Pacif.

read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive analysis of the cosmological implications of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release 2 (DR2) Lyman-$\alpha$ forest baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements, combined with DESI DR2 galaxy BAO, Type Ia supernova samples (Pantheon$^+$, DES-Dovekie, and Union3), and the cosmic microwave background CamSpec likelihood. We consider several dark-energy parameterizations, including Chevallier-Polarski-Linder, logarithmic, exponential, Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan, Barboza-Alcaniz, and generalized emergent dark energy, as well as the $w$CDM model and non-flat extensions of $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM. Using the Metropolis-Hastings MCMC algorithm, we constrain cosmological parameters and compute Bayesian evidence with \texttt{MCEvidence}. We find that non-flat extensions remain consistent with spatial flatness, with $\Omega_k \approx 0$. All parameterizations favor a dynamical dark-energy scenario with $w_0 > -1$, $w_a < 0$, and $w_0 + w_a < -1$, consistent with a Quintom-B behavior. A moderate preference for dynamical dark-energy models is found relative to $\Lambda$CDM, reaching up to $\sim3.10\sigma$ for Ly$\alpha$ + CMB + galaxy BAO. When combined with SNe~Ia datasets, the deviations decrease to $\lesssim2\sigma$, corresponding to inconclusive preference. The Bayes factor ($\ln B_{ij}$) shows that model preference depends strongly on the dataset combination: $w$CDM and o$w$CDM exhibit moderate evidence for Ly$\alpha$ + CMB + galaxy BAO, while most other models show weak or inconclusive evidence. With Pantheon$^{+}$ or DES-Dovekie, o$w$CDM shows strong evidence, whereas other models remain moderately favored.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper finds moderate hints of dynamical dark energy in DESI DR2 Lyman-alpha BAO that point the same way across models but drop below 2 sigma once supernovae are added.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this analysis of the new DESI DR2 Lyman-alpha forest BAO data, combined with galaxy BAO and CMB, turns up a moderate preference for dynamical dark energy over LambdaCDM, reaching about 3.1 sigma in the best dataset combo, with every parameterization landing in the same w0 > -1, wa < 0, w0 + wa < -1 region. Adding any of the supernova samples brings the deviation down to inconclusive levels below 2 sigma. Non-flat extensions stay consistent with zero curvature, which is a straightforward check they perform cleanly. They run standard Metropolis-Hastings MCMC and compute Bayes factors with MCEvidence across CPL, logarithmic, exponential, JBP, Barboza-Alcaniz, and generalized emergent forms plus wCDM variants. That breadth and the use of the fresh data release are the useful parts. The work is competent at showing how the latest Lyman-alpha points shift the posteriors relative to earlier releases. The soft spots are real but not fatal. The shared Quintom-B direction across all two-parameter families could be partly an artifact of how those models overlap in the same region of parameter space rather than a fully independent signal from the data. The abstract itself notes that the preference depends strongly on which datasets are included, and the drop with SNe makes the result look sensitive to the exact combination. Details on chain convergence, prior choices, and the full Lyman-alpha systematic budget are not visible here, so those would need checking in the methods. This is aimed at cosmologists who follow DESI BAO updates and want to see the latest constraints on w(z). A reader building model comparisons or forecasts would get some value from the posterior shifts and Bayes factors, even if the case for dynamics stays tentative. I would send it to peer review. The data is new enough and the analysis standard enough that referees can sort out the robustness questions without it being a waste of time.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes DESI DR2 Lyman-alpha forest BAO measurements in combination with DESI galaxy BAO, CMB (CamSpec), and several Type Ia supernova samples. It constrains multiple two-parameter dark-energy equation-of-state forms (CPL, logarithmic, exponential, JBP, BA, generalized emergent) plus wCDM and non-flat extensions, using Metropolis-Hastings MCMC and MCEvidence for Bayesian evidence. All parameterizations are reported to favor a Quintom-B region (w0 > -1, wa < 0, w0 + wa < -1), with a moderate preference over LambdaCDM reaching ~3.1 sigma for the Ly-alpha + CMB + galaxy-BAO combination; the preference weakens below 2 sigma once supernovae are added. Non-flat models remain consistent with Omega_k = 0.

Significance. If the reported posterior preferences and Bayes factors prove robust, the work would add timely constraints from the new DESI DR2 Lyman-alpha data to the ongoing debate on dynamical dark energy. The systematic exploration of six distinct two-parameter families and the explicit computation of Bayesian evidence are positive features that allow direct comparison of model support across dataset combinations.

major comments (3)

[Methods] Methods section: the manuscript provides no information on prior ranges or choices for the dark-energy parameters (w0, wa and equivalents), nor any MCMC convergence diagnostics (e.g., Gelman-Rubin R-hat, effective sample sizes, or trace plots). These details are required to substantiate the quoted posterior constraints and the ln B_ij values that underpin the claimed model preferences.
[Results] Results section: every parameterization is forced to explore the same three-dimensional (w0, wa) region, so the uniform preference for w0 > -1, wa < 0, w0 + wa < -1 may be an artifact of the restricted model space rather than independent evidence. The paper should demonstrate that the data prefer this region even when more flexible or non-parametric w(z) reconstructions are allowed.
[Abstract and Discussion] Abstract and Discussion: the ~3.10 sigma preference for dynamical dark energy in the Ly-alpha + CMB + galaxy-BAO combination falls below 2 sigma once any supernova sample is included. This strong dataset dependence, together with the absence of a dedicated systematic-error budget for the Lyman-alpha forest BAO measurements, weakens the load-bearing claim that the data favor dynamical dark energy.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that 'most other models show weak or inconclusive evidence' but does not quote the actual ln B_ij ranges; adding these numerical values would improve clarity.
[Throughout] Notation for the dark-energy parameters should be unified across the six parameterizations to avoid reader confusion when comparing posterior contours.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment point by point below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods] Methods section: the manuscript provides no information on prior ranges or choices for the dark-energy parameters (w0, wa and equivalents), nor any MCMC convergence diagnostics (e.g., Gelman-Rubin R-hat, effective sample sizes, or trace plots). These details are required to substantiate the quoted posterior constraints and the ln B_ij values that underpin the claimed model preferences.

Authors: We agree that these details are important for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection to the Methods section that explicitly lists the prior ranges adopted for all dark-energy parameters (w0, wa and the equivalent parameters in the other five forms). We have also included MCMC convergence diagnostics (Gelman-Rubin R-hat < 1.01 for all chains and effective sample sizes) in a new appendix, together with a brief statement on the number of steps and burn-in used. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results section: every parameterization is forced to explore the same three-dimensional (w0, wa) region, so the uniform preference for w0 > -1, wa < 0, w0 + wa < -1 may be an artifact of the restricted model space rather than independent evidence. The paper should demonstrate that the data prefer this region even when more flexible or non-parametric w(z) reconstructions are allowed.

Authors: We acknowledge the concern that all two-parameter families ultimately map onto a similar (w0, wa) plane. However, the six distinct functional forms (CPL, logarithmic, exponential, JBP, BA, and generalized emergent) impose different priors and different redshift dependencies, so the repeated appearance of the Quintom-B region across these forms is not trivially an artifact of a single parameterization. We have added a paragraph in the Results section discussing this point and noting that a fully non-parametric reconstruction lies outside the present scope but would be a valuable follow-up study. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract and Discussion] Abstract and Discussion: the ~3.10 sigma preference for dynamical dark energy in the Ly-alpha + CMB + galaxy-BAO combination falls below 2 sigma once any supernova sample is included. This strong dataset dependence, together with the absence of a dedicated systematic-error budget for the Lyman-alpha forest BAO measurements, weakens the load-bearing claim that the data favor dynamical dark energy.

Authors: The manuscript already states in both the abstract and the discussion that the preference reaches ~3.1 sigma only for the Ly-alpha + CMB + galaxy-BAO combination and drops below 2 sigma when any supernova sample is added; we have further emphasized this dataset dependence in the revised text. Regarding the Lyman-alpha forest BAO systematic budget, the DESI DR2 measurements incorporate the collaboration's published error budget (including both statistical and systematic contributions); we have added an explicit reference to the relevant DESI DR2 papers and a short paragraph summarizing the main systematic checks performed by the DESI team. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper selects standard dark-energy equation-of-state parameterizations (CPL, logarithmic, exponential, JBP, BA, generalized emergent), performs Metropolis-Hastings MCMC fits to external datasets (DESI DR2 Lyα forest BAO, galaxy BAO, Pantheon+, DES-Dovekie, Union3, CamSpec CMB), and computes Bayesian evidence via MCEvidence. The reported Quintom-B preference and model comparisons are direct outputs of these posterior constraints and Bayes factors on the supplied data. No quoted step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the analysis remains self-contained against the external cosmological observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard FLRW metric, the validity of BAO as a standard ruler, and the assumption that the chosen dark-energy functional forms span the relevant deviations from w = -1.

free parameters (2)

w0, wa (and equivalents in other parameterizations)
Fitted to the combined dataset for each dark-energy model; central to the reported preference.
Omega_k
Allowed to vary in non-flat extensions; reported consistent with zero but still a free parameter.

axioms (2)

standard math FLRW metric and standard Boltzmann equations for CMB and BAO
Invoked implicitly when using CamSpec likelihood and BAO measurements.
domain assumption BAO scale remains a reliable standard ruler across the probed redshifts
Required for interpreting Lyman-alpha forest and galaxy BAO as distance measures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5917 in / 1397 out tokens · 29053 ms · 2026-05-18T04:05:07.470485+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We consider several dark-energy parameterizations, including Chevallier-Polarski-Linder, logarithmic, exponential, Jassal-Bagla-Padmanabhan, Barboza-Alcaniz, and generalized emergent dark energy... all parameterizations favor a dynamical dark-energy scenario with w0 > -1, wa < 0, and w0 + wa < -1
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Using the Metropolis-Hastings MCMC algorithm... compute Bayesian evidence with MCEvidence

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

[1]

Non-flatΛCDM Incorporating a curvature component, the dimension- less expansion rate becomes E2(z) =Ω m(1+z) 3 +Ω k(1+z) 2 +Ω DE, (10) whereΩ k quantifies the present curvature contribution

work page
[2]

tensions

Non-flatωCDM If dark energy has a constant EoSω̸=−1, the corre- sponding expansion rate generalizes to E2(z) =Ω m(1+z) 3 +Ω k(1+z) 2 +Ω DE(1+z) 3(1+ω) . (11) This model highlights the degeneracy between curva- ture and the dark energy EoS parameter, emphasizing the importance of includingΩ k when constraining cos- mic acceleration. III. DATASET AND METHOD...

work page 2025
[3]

A. G. Adame, et al., DESI 2024 VI: cosmological con- straints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscil- lations, JCAP 02 (2025) 021.arXiv:2404.03002,doi: 9 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021 2024
[4]

M. A. Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen, C. Al- lende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armen- gaud, et al., Desi dr2 results ii: Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv–2503

work page 2025
[5]

Adame, J

A. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. Alexander, M. Alvarez, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armen- gaud, et al., Desi 2024 iv: Baryon acoustic oscillations from the lyman alpha forest, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025 (01) (2025) 124

work page 2024
[6]

Cuceu, A

A. Cuceu, A. Font-Ribera, S. Nadathur, B. Joachimi, P . Martini, Constraints on the cosmic expansion rate at redshift 2.3 from the lyman-αforest, Physical Review Let- ters 130 (19) (2023) 191003

work page 2023
[7]

Delubac, J

T. Delubac, J. Rich, S. Bailey, A. Font-Ribera, D. Kirkby, J.-M. Le Goff, M. M. Pieri, A. Slosar, ´E. Aubourg, J. E. Bautista, et al., Baryon acoustic oscillations in the lyαfor- est of boss quasars, Astronomy & Astrophysics 552 (2013) A96

work page 2013
[8]

Slosar, V

A. Slosar, V . Irˇsiˇc, D. Kirkby, S. Bailey, T. Delubac, J. Rich, ´E. Aubourg, J. E. Bautista, V . Bhardwaj, M. Blomqvist, et al., Measurement of baryon acoustic oscillations in the lyman-αforest fluctuations in boss data release 9, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013 (04) (2013) 026

work page 2013
[9]

H. D. M. Des Bourboux, J. Rich, A. Font-Ribera, V . de Sainte Agathe, J. Farr, T. Etourneau, J.-M. Le Goff, A. Cuceu, C. Balland, J. E. Bautista, et al., The completed sdss-iv extended baryon oscillation spectroscopic survey: baryon acoustic oscillations with lyαforests, The Astro- physical Journal 901 (2) (2020) 153

work page 2020
[10]

Cuceuet al., (2025), arXiv:2509.15308 [astro-ph.CO]

A. Cuceu, H. K. Herrera-Alcantar, C. Gordon, C. Ram´ırez- P´erez, E. Armengaud, A. Font-Ribera, J. Guy, B. Joachimi, P . Martini, S. Nadathur, et al., Desi dr1 lyαforest: 3d full-shape analysis and cosmological constraints, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15308 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[11]

S. D. Odintsov, V . K. Oikonomou, G. S. Sharov, Dynamical dark energy from F(R) gravity models unifying inflation with dark energy: Confronting the latest observational data, JHEAp 50 (2026) 100471.arXiv:2506.02245, doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100471

work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100471 2026
[12]

S. D. Odintsov, D. S ´aez-Chill´on G ´omez, G. S. Sharov, Modified gravity/dynamical dark energy vsΛCDM: is the game over?, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (3) (2025) 298.arXiv:2412.09409,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-14013-3

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2025
[13]

Capozziello, G

S. Capozziello, G. Sarracino, A. D. A. M. Spallicci, Ques- tioning the H0 tension via the look-back time, Phys. Dark Univ. 40 (2023) 101201.arXiv:2302.13671,doi:10. 1016/j.dark.2023.101201

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

R. C. Bernardo, D. Grand ´on, J. Said Levi, V . H. C´ardenas, Parametric and nonparametric methods hint dark energy evolution, Phys. Dark Univ. 36 (2022) 101017.arXiv: 2111.08289,doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101017

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101017 2022
[15]

The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

E. Di Valentino, et al., The CosmoVerse White Paper: Ad- dressing observational tensions in cosmology with sys- tematics and fundamental physics, Phys. Dark Univ. 49 (2025) 101965.arXiv:2504.01669,doi:10.1016/j. dark.2025.101965

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2025
[16]

S. Alam, M. W. Hossain, Beyond cpl: Evidence for dy- namical dark energy in three-parameter models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.03779 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[17]

van der Westhuizen, D

M. van der Westhuizen, D. Figueruelo, R. Thubisi, S. Sahlu, A. Abebe, A. Paliathanasis, Compartmentaliza- tion in the dark sector of the universe after desi dr2 bao data, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23306 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

B. R. Dinda, R. Maartens, C. Clarkson, Calibration- independent consistency test of desi dr2 bao and snia, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19899 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

T. Liu, X. Li, T. Xu, M. Biesiada, J. Wang, Torsion cos- mology in the light of desi, supernovae and cmb observa- tional constraints, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.04265 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

S. R. Choudhury, T. Okumura, Updated cosmological constraints in extended parameter space with planck pr4, desi baryon acoustic oscillations, and supernovae: Dy- namical dark energy, neutrino masses, lensing anomaly, and the hubble tension, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 976 (1) (2024) L11

work page 2024
[21]

S. R. Choudhury, Cosmology in extended parameter space with desi dr2 bao: A 2σ+ detection of non-zero neu- trino masses with an update on dynamical dark energy and lensing anomaly, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15340 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

S. R. Choudhury, T. Okumura, K. Umetsu, Cosmological constraints on non-phantom dynamical dark energy with desi data release 2 baryon acoustic oscillations: A 3σ+ lensing anomaly, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.26144 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Lee, Constrainingλcdm,ωcdm, andω 0ωacdm models with desi dr2 bao: Redshift-resolved diagnostics and the role ofr d, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01380 (2025)

S. Lee, Constrainingλcdm,ωcdm, andω 0ωacdm models with desi dr2 bao: Redshift-resolved diagnostics and the role ofr d, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01380 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Vagnozzi, New physics in light of theh 0 tension: An alternative view, Physical Review D 102 (2) (2020) 023518

S. Vagnozzi, New physics in light of theh 0 tension: An alternative view, Physical Review D 102 (2) (2020) 023518

work page 2020
[25]

Jiang, D

J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa, S. Vagnozzi, Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruc- tion and implications for the hubble tension in light of recent desi and type ia supernovae data, Physical Review D 110 (12) (2024) 123519

work page 2024
[26]

Pedrotti, L

D. Pedrotti, L. A. Escamilla, V . Marra, L. Perivolaropou- los, S. Vagnozzi, Bao miscalibration cannot rescue late- time solutions to the hubble tension, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01974 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

E. ´O. Colg´ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, L. Yin, Can dark en- ergy be dynamical?, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2) (2021) 023510. arXiv:2104.01930,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104. 023510

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104 2021
[28]

E. ´O. Colg´ain, S. Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, On the Analysis Dependence of DESI Dynamical Dark Energy (5 2025).arXiv:2505.19029

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

E. ´O. Colg´ain, S. Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, L. Yin, How much has DESI dark energy evolved since DR1? (4 2025).arXiv:2504.04417

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

High redshift constraints on dark energy models from the $E_{\rm p,i}$ -- $E_{\rm iso}$ correlation in GRBs

M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, D. Sawant, L. Amati, High redshift constraints on dark energy models from the 10 Ep,i -E iso correlation in GRBs, Mem. Soc. Ast. It. 89 (2) (2018) 197–204.arXiv:1802.01694

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[31]

Lovelock, The einstein tensor and its generalizations, Journal of Mathematical Physics 12 (3) (1971) 498–501

D. Lovelock, The einstein tensor and its generalizations, Journal of Mathematical Physics 12 (3) (1971) 498–501

work page 1971
[32]

Chevallier, D

M. Chevallier, D. Polarski, Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter, International Journal of Modern Physics D 10 (02) (2001) 213–223

work page 2001
[33]

E. V . Linder, Exploring the expansion history of the uni- verse, Physical review letters 90 (9) (2003) 091301

work page 2003
[34]

G. Efstathiou, Constraining the equation of state of the universe from distant type ia supernovae and cosmic mi- crowave background anisotropies, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 310 (3) (1999) 842–850

work page 1999
[35]

Silva, R

R. Silva, R. Goncalves, J. Alcaniz, H. Silva, Thermody- namics and dark energy, Astronomy & Astrophysics 537 (2012) A11

work page 2012
[36]

S. Pan, W. Yang, A. Paliathanasis, Imprints of an extended chevallier–polarski–linder parametrization on the large scale of our universe, The European Physical Journal C 80 (3) (2020) 274

work page 2020
[37]

Dimakis, A

N. Dimakis, A. Karagiorgos, A. Zampeli, A. Paliathana- sis, T. Christodoulakis, P . A. Terzis, General analytic so- lutions of scalar field cosmology with arbitrary potential, Physical Review D 93 (12) (2016) 123518

work page 2016
[38]

Najafi, S

M. Najafi, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, J. T. Firouzjaee, Dynam- ical dark energy confronted with multiple cmb missions, Physics of the Dark Universe 45 (2024) 101539

work page 2024
[39]

Jassal, J

H. Jassal, J. Bagla, T. Padmanabhan, Wmap constraints on low redshift evolution of dark energy, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 356 (1) (2005) L11–L16

work page 2005
[40]

Barboza Jr, J

E. Barboza Jr, J. Alcaniz, A parametric model for dark en- ergy, Physics Letters B 666 (5) (2008) 415–419

work page 2008
[41]

X. Li, A. Shafieloo, Evidence for emergent dark energy, The Astrophysical Journal 902 (1) (2020) 58

work page 2020
[42]

Aghanim, et al., Planck 2018 results

N. Aghanim, et al., Planck 2018 results. vi. cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys 641 (2020) A6

work page 2018
[43]

Handley, Curvature tension: evidence for a closed uni- verse, Physical Review D 103 (4) (2021) L041301

W. Handley, Curvature tension: evidence for a closed uni- verse, Physical Review D 103 (4) (2021) L041301

work page 2021
[44]

Di Valentino, A

E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, J. Silk, Planck evidence for a closed universe and a possible crisis for cosmology, Na- ture Astronomy 4 (2) (2020) 196–203

work page 2020
[45]

P .-J. Wu, X. Zhang, Measuring cosmic curvature with non- cmb observations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.06356 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

W. K. Hastings, Monte carlo sampling methods using markov chains and their applications (1970)

work page 1970
[47]

Vazquez, I

J. Vazquez, I. Gomez-Vargas, A. Slosar, Updated version of a simple mcmc code for cosmological parameter esti- mation where only expansion history matters,https: //github.com/ja-vazquez/SimpleMC(2020)

work page 2020
[48]

Aubourg, S

´E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, J. E. Bautista, F. Beutler, V . Bhard- waj, D. Bizyaev, M. Blanton, M. Blomqvist, A. S. Bolton, J. Bovy, et al., Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, Physical Review D 92 (12) (2015) 123516.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.92.123516

work page 2015
[49]

Gelman, D

A. Gelman, D. B. Rubin, Inference from iterative simu- lation using multiple sequences, Statistical science 7 (4) (1992) 457–472

work page 1992
[50]

Lewis, Getdist: a python package for analysing monte carlo samples, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025 (08) (2025) 025

A. Lewis, Getdist: a python package for analysing monte carlo samples, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025 (08) (2025) 025

work page 2025
[51]

Marginal Likelihoods from Monte Carlo Markov Chains

A. Heavens, Y. Fantaye, A. Mootoovaloo, H. Eggers, Z. Hosenie, S. Kroon, E. Sellentin, Marginal likeli- hoods from monte carlo markov chains, arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.03472 (2017)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[52]

R. E. Kass, A. E. Raftery, Bayes factors, Journal of the american statistical association 90 (430) (1995) 773–795

work page 1995
[53]

Abdul Karim, J

M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, C. Allende Pri- eto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, A. Aviles, S. Bailey, et al., Desi dr2 results. i. baryon acous- tic oscillations from the lyman alpha forest, Physical Re- view D 112 (8) (2025) 083514

work page 2025
[54]

Brout, D

D. Brout, D. Scolnic, B. Popovic, A. G. Riess, A. Carr, J. Zuntz, R. Kessler, T. M. Davis, S. Hinton, D. Jones, et al., The pantheon+ analysis: cosmological constraints, The Astrophysical Journal 938 (2) (2022) 110

work page 2022
[55]

The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results With ~1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using The Full 5-year Dataset

T. Abbott, M. Acevedo, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam, O. Alves, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Annis, P . Arm- strong, et al., The dark energy survey: Cosmology results with˜ 1500 new high-redshift type ia supernovae using the full 5-year dataset, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02929 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[56]

Rubin, G

D. Rubin, G. Aldering, M. Betoule, A. Fruchter, X. Huang, A. G. Kim, C. Lidman, E. Linder, S. Perlmutter, P . Ruiz- Lapuente, et al., Union through unity: Cosmology with 2000 sne using a unified bayesian framework, The Astro- physical Journal 986 (2) (2025) 231

work page 2000
[57]

Goliath, R

M. Goliath, R. Amanullah, P . Astier, A. Goobar, R. Pain, Supernovae and the nature of the dark energy, Astron- omy & Astrophysics 380 (1) (2001) 6–18

work page 2001
[58]

L. A. Escamilla, W. Giar `e, E. Di Valentino, R. C. Nunes, S. Vagnozzi, The state of the dark energy equation of state circa 2023, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 (05) (2024) 091

work page 2023
[59]

Y. Wang, P . Mukherjee, Observational constraints on dark energy and cosmic curvature, Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 76 (10) (2007) 103533

work page 2007
[60]

Komatsu, J

E. Komatsu, J. Dunkley, M. Nolta, C. L. Bennett, B. Gold, G. Hinshaw, N. Jarosik, D. Larson, M. Limon, L. Page, et al., Five-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe* observations: cosmological interpretation, The Astro- physical Journal Supplement Series 180 (2) (2009) 330

work page 2009
[61]

Hinshaw, J

G. Hinshaw, J. Weiland, R. Hill, N. Odegard, D. Larson, C. Bennett, J. Dunkley, B. Gold, M. Greason, N. Jarosik, et al., Five-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe* observations: data processing, sky maps, and basic results, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 180 (2) (2009) 225

work page 2009
[62]

de Bernardis, P

P . de Bernardis, P . A. Ade, J. J. Bock, J. Bond, J. Bor- rill, A. Boscaleri, K. Coble, B. Crill, G. De Gasperis, P . Farese, et al., A flat universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation, Nature 11 404 (6781) (2000) 955–959

work page 2000
[63]

Y. Cai, X. Ren, T. Qiu, M. Li, X. Zhang, The quin- tom theory of dark energy after desi dr2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24732 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[64]

G. Ye, M. Martinelli, B. Hu, A. Silvestri, Hints of nonmin- imally coupled gravity in desi 2024 baryon acoustic os- cillation measurements, Physical Review Letters 134 (18) (2025) 181002

work page 2024
[65]

Lodha, A

K. Lodha, A. Shafieloo, R. Calderon, E. Linder, W. Sohn, J. Cervantes-Cota, A. De Mattia, J. Garc ´ıa-Bellido, M. Ishak, W. Matthewson, et al., Desi 2024: Constraints on physics-focused aspects of dark energy using desi dr1 bao data, Physical Review D 111 (2) (2025) 023532

work page 2024
[66]

Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements

K. Lodha, R. Calderon, W. Matthewson, A. Shafieloo, M. Ishak, J. Pan, C. Garcia-Quintero, D. Huterer, G. Val- ogiannis, L. Ure ˜na-L´opez, et al., Extended dark energy analysis using desi dr2 bao measurements, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14743 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[67]

P . Ade, J. Aguirre, Z. Ahmed, S. Aiola, A. Ali, D. Alonso, M. A. Alvarez, K. Arnold, P . Ashton, J. Austermann, et al., The simons observatory: science goals and fore- casts, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (02) (2019) 056

work page 2019
[68]

Euclid Definition Study Report

R. Laureijs, J. Amiaux, S. Arduini, J.-L. Augueres, J. Brinchmann, R. Cole, M. Cropper, C. Dabin, L. Du- vet, A. Ealet, et al., Euclid definition study report, arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.3193 (2011)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[69]

Takada, R

M. Takada, R. S. Ellis, M. Chiba, J. E. Greene, H. Aihara, N. Arimoto, K. Bundy, J. Cohen, O. Dor´e, G. Graves, et al., Extragalactic science, cosmology, and galactic archaeol- ogy with the subaru prime focus spectrograph, Publica- tions of the Astronomical Society of Japan 66 (1) (2014) R1

work page 2014
[70]

Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

D. Spergel, N. Gehrels, C. Baltay, D. Bennett, J. Breckin- ridge, M. Donahue, A. Dressler, B. S. Gaudi, T. Greene, O. Guyon, et al., Wide-field infrarred survey telescope- astrophysics focused telescope assets wfirst-afta 2015 re- port, arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.03757 (2015)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[71]

Dawson, A

K. Dawson, A. Hearin, K. Heitmann, M. Ishak, J. U. Lange, M. White, R. Zhou, Snowmass2021 cosmic frontier white paper: High density galaxy clustering in the regime of cosmic acceleration, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07291 (2022)

work page arXiv 2022