pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2504.01669 · v3 · submitted 2025-04-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

Eleonora Di Valentino , Jackson Levi Said , Adam Riess , Agnieszka Pollo , Vivian Poulin , Adri\`a G\'omez-Valent , Amanda Weltman , Antonella Palmese
show 528 more authors
Caroline D. Huang Carsten van de Bruck Chandra Shekhar Saraf Cheng-Yu Kuo Cora Uhlemann Daniela Grand\'on Dante Paz Dominique Eckert Elsa M. Teixeira Emmanuel N. Saridakis Eoin \'O Colg\'ain Florian Beutler Florian Niedermann Francesco Bajardi Gabriela Barenboim Giulia Gubitosi Ilaria Musella Indranil Banik Istvan Szapudi Jack Singal Jaume Haro Cases Jens Chluba Jes\'us Torrado Jurgen Mifsud Karsten Jedamzik Khaled Said Konstantinos Dialektopoulos Laura Herold Leandros Perivolaropoulos Lei Zu Llu\'is Galbany Louise Breuval Luca Visinelli Luis A. Escamilla Luis A. Anchordoqui M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari Margherita Lembo Maria Giovanna Dainotti Maria Vincenzi Marika Asgari Martina Gerbino Matteo Forconi Michele Cantiello Michele Moresco Micol Benetti Nils Sch\"oneberg \"Ozg\"ur Akarsu Rafael C. Nunes Reginald Christian Bernardo Ricardo Ch\'avez Richard I. Anderson Richard Watkins Salvatore Capozziello Siyang Li Sunny Vagnozzi Supriya Pan Tommaso Treu Vid Irsic Will Handley William Giar\`e Yukei Murakami Ad\`ele Poudou Alan Heavens Alan Kogut Alba Domi Aleksander {\L}ukasz Lenart Alessandro Melchiorri Alessandro Vadal\`a Alexandra Amon Alexander Bonilla Alexander Reeves Alexander Zhuk Alfio Bonanno Ali \"Ovg\"un Alice Pisani Alireza Talebian Amare Abebe Amin Aboubrahim Ana Luisa Gonz\'alez Mor\'an Andr\'as Kov\'acs Andreas Papatriantafyllou Andrew R. Liddle Andreas Lymperis Andronikos Paliathanasis Andrzej Borowiec Anil Kumar Yadav Anita Yadav Anjan Ananda Sen Anjitha John William Mini Latha Anne Christine Davis Anowar J. Shajib Anthony Walters Anto Idicherian Lonappan Anton Chudaykin Antonio Capodagli Antonio da Silva Antonio De Felice Antonio Racioppi Araceli Soler Oficial Ariadna Montiel Arianna Favale Armando Bernui Arrianne Crystal Velasco Asta Heinesen Athanasios Bakopoulos Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis Bahman Khanpour Bangalore S. Sathyaprakash Bartek Zgirski Benjamin L'Huillier Benoit Famaey Bhuvnesh Jain Biesiada Marek Bing Zhang Biswajit Karmakar Branko Dragovich Brooks Thomas Carlos Correa Carlos G. Boiza Catarina Marques Celia Escamilla-Rivera Charalampos Tzerefos Chi Zhang Chiara De Leo Christian Pfeifer Christine Lee Christo Venter Cl\'audio Gomes Clecio Roque De Bom Cristian Moreno-Pulido Damianos Iosifidis Dan Grin Daniel Blixt Dan Scolnic Daniele Oriti Daria Dobrycheva Dario Bettoni David Benisty David Fern\'andez-Arenas David L. Wiltshire David Sanchez Cid David Tamayo David Valls-Gabaud Davide Pedrotti Deng Wang Denitsa Staicova Despoina Totolou Diego Rubiera-Garcia Dinko Milakovi\'c Dom Pesce Dominique Sluse Du\v{s}ko Borka Ebrahim Yusofi Elena Giusarma Elena Terlevich Elena Tomasetti Elias C. Vagenas Elisa Fazzari Elisa G. M. Ferreira Elvis Barakovic Emanuela Dimastrogiovanni Emil Brinch Holm Emil Mottola Emre \"Oz\"ulker Enrico Specogna Enzo Brocato Erik Jensko Erika Antonette Enriquez Esha Bhatia Fabio Bresolin Felipe Avila Filippo Bouch\`e Flavio Bombacigno Fotios K. Anagnostopoulos Francesco Pace Francesco Sorrenti Francisco S. N. Lobo Fr\'ed\'eric Courbin Frode K. Hansen Greg Sloan Gabriel Farrugia Gabriel Lynch Gabriela Garcia-Arroyo Gabriella Raimondo Gaetano Lambiase Gagandeep S. Anand Gaspard Poulot Genly Leon Gerasimos Kouniatalis Germano Nardini G\'eza Cs\"ornyei Giacomo Galloni Giada Bargiacchi Giannis Papagiannopoulos Giovanni Montani Giovanni Otalora Giulia De Somma Giuliana Fiorentino Giuseppe Fanizza Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano Giuseppe Sarracino Gonzalo J. Olmo Goran S. Djordjevi\'c Guadalupe Ca\~nas-Herrera Hanyu Cheng Harry Desmond Hassan Abdalla Houzun Chen Hsu-Wen Chiang Hume A. Feldman Hussain Gohar Ido Ben-Dayan Ignacio Sevilla-Noarbe Ignatios Antoniadis Ilim Cimdiker In\^es S. Albuquerque Ioannis D. Gialamas Ippocratis Saltas Iryna Vavilova Isidro G\'omez-Vargas Ismael Ayuso Ismailov Nariman Zeynalabdi Ivan de Martino Ivonne Zavala J. Alberto V\'azquez Jacobo Asorey Janusz Gluza Javier Rubio Jenny G. Sorce Jenny Wagner Jeremy Sakstein Jessica Santiago Jim Braatz Joan Sol\`a Peracaula John Blakeslee John Webb Jose A. R. Cembranos Jos\'e Pedro Mimoso Joseph Jensen Juan Garc\'ia-Bellido Judit Prat Kathleen Sammut Kay Lehnert Keith R. Dienes Kishan Deka Konrad Kuijken Krishna Naidoo L\'aszl\'o \'Arp\'ad Gergely Laur J\"arv Laura Mersini-Houghton Leila L. Graef L\'eo Vacher Levon Pogosian Lilia Anguelova Lindita Hamolli Lu Yin Luca Caloni Luca Izzo Lucas Macri Luis E. Padilla Luz \'Angela Garc\'ia Maciej Bilicki Mahdi Najafi Manolis Plionis Manuel Gonzalez-Espinoza Manuel Hohmann Marcel A. van der Westhuizen Marcella Marconi Marcin Postolak Marco de Cesare Marco Regis Marek Biesiada Maret Einasto Margus Saal Maria Caruana Maria Petronikolou Mariam Bouhmadi-L\'opez Mariana Melo Mariaveronica De Angelis Marie-No\"elle C\'el\'erier Marina Cort\^es Mark Reid Markus Michael Rau Martin S. Sloth Martti Raidal Masahiro Takada Masoume Reyhani Massimiliano Romanello Massimo Marengo Mathias Garny Mat\'ias Leizerovich Matteo Martinelli Matteo Tagliazucchi Mehmet Demirci Miguel A. S. Pinto Miguel A. Sabogal Miguel A. Garc\'ia-Aspeitia Milan Milo\v{s}evi\'c Mina Ghodsi Mustapha Ishak Nelson J. Nunes Nick Samaras Nico Hamaus Nico Schuster Nicola Borghi Nicola Deiosso Nicola Tamanini Nicolao Fornengo Nihan Kat{\i}rc{\i} Nikolaos E. Mavromatos Nicholas Petropoulos Nikolina \v{S}ar\v{c}evi\'c Nils A. Nilsson Noemi Frusciante Octavian Postavaru Oem Trivedi Oleksii Sokoliuk Olga Mena Paloma Morilla Paolo Campeti Paolo Salucci Paula Boubel Pawe{\l} Bielewicz Pekka Hein\"am\"aki Petar Suman Petros Asimakis Pierros Ntelis Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente Pran Nath Predrag Jovanovi\'c Purba Mukherjee Rados{\l}aw Wojtak Rafaela Gsponer Rafid H. Dejrah Rahul Shah Rasmi Hajjar Rebecca Briffa Rebecca Habas Reggie C. Pantig Renier Mendoza Riccardo della Monica Richard Stiskalek Rishav Roshan Rita B. Neves Roberto Molinaro Roberto Terlevich Rocco D'Agostino Rodrigo Sandoval-Orozco Ronaldo C. Batista Ruchika Kaushik Ruth Lazkoz Saeed Rastgoo Sahar Mohammadi Salvatore Samuele Sirletti Sandeep Haridasu Sanjay Mandal Saurya Das Sebastian Bahamonde Sebastian Grandis Sebastian Trojanowski Sergei D. Odintsov Sergij Mazurenko Shahab Joudaki Sherry H. Suyu Shouvik Roy Choudhury Shruti Bhatporia Shun-Sheng Li Simeon Bird Simon Birrer Simone Paradiso Simony Santos da Costa Sofia Contarini Sophie Henrot-Versill\'e Spyros Basilakos Stefano Casertano Stefano Gariazzo Stylianos A. Tsilioukas Surajit Kalita Suresh Kumar Susana J. Landau Sveva Castello Swayamtrupta Panda Tanja Petrushevska Thanasis Karakasis Thejs Brinckmann Tiago B. Gon\c{c}alves Tiziano Schiavone Tom Abel Tomi Koivisto Torsten Bringmann Umut Demirbozan Utkarsh Kumar Valerio Marra Maurice H.P.M. van Putten Vasileios Kalaitzidis Vasiliki A. Mitsou Vasilios Zarikas Vedad Pasic Venus Keus Ver\'onica Motta Vesna Borka Jovanovi\'c V\'ictor H. C\'ardenas Vincenzo Ripepi Vincenzo Salzano Violetta Impellizzeri Vitor da Fonseca Vittorio Ghirardini Vladas Vansevi\v{c}ius Weiqiang Yang Wojciech Hellwing Xin Ren Yu-Min Hu Yuejia Zhai Abdul Malik Sultan Adrienn Pataki Alessandro Santoni Aliya Batool Aneta Wojnar Arman Tursunov Avik De Ayush Hazarika Baojiu Li Benjamin Bose Bivudutta Mishra Bobomurat Ahmedov Claudia Sc\'occola Crescenzo Tortora D'Arcy Kenworthy Daniel E. Holz David F. Mota David S. Pereira Devon M. Williams Dillon Brout Dong Ha Lee Eduardo Guendelman Edward Olex Emanuelly Silva Emre Onur Kahya Eva-Maria Mueller Felipe Andrade-Oliveira Feven Markos Hunde F. R. Joaquim Florian Pacaud Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine Pozo Nu\~nez F. G\'abor R\'acz Gene Carlo Belinario Geraint F. Lewis Gergely D\'alya Giorgio Laverda Guido Risaliti Guillermo Franco-Abell\'an Hayden Zammit Hayley Camilleri Helene M. Courtois Hooman Moradpour Igor de Oliveira Cardoso Pedreira Il\'i dio Lopes Istv\'an Csabai James W. Rohlf J. Bogdanoska Javier de Cruz P\'erez Joan Bachs-Esteban Joseph Sultana Julien Lesgourgues Jun-Qian Jiang Karem Pe\~nal\'o Castillo Kimet Jusufi Lavinia Heisenberg Laxmipriya Pati L\'eon V.E. Koopmans Lokesh kumar Duchaniya Lucas Lombriser Mahdieh Gol Bashmani Moghadam Mar\'ia P\'erez Garrote Mariano Dom\'inguez Marine Samsonyan Mark Pace Martin Kr\v{s}\v{s}\'ak Masroor C. Pookkillath Matteo Peronaci Matteo Piani Matthildi Raftogianni Meet J. Vyas Melina Michalopoulou Merab Gogberashvili Michael Klasen Michele Cicoli Miguel Quartin Miguel Zumalac\'arregui Milan S. Dimitrijevi\'c Milos Dordevic Mindaugas Kar\v{c}iauskas Morgan Le Delliou Nastassia Grimm Nicol\'as Augusto Kozameh Nicoleta Voicu Nicolina Pop Nikos Chatzifotis Oliver Fabio Piattella Pedro da Silveira Ferreira P\'eter Raffai Peter Schupp Pradyumn Kumar Sahoo Roberto V. Maluf Ruth Durrer S. A. Kadam Sabino Matarrese Samuel Brieden Santiago Gonz\'alez-Gait\'an Santosh V. Lohakare Scott Watson Shao-Jiang Wang Sim\~ao Marques Nunes Soumya Chakrabarti Suvodip Mukherjee Tajron Juri\'c Tessa Baker Theodoros Nakas Tiago Barreiro Upala Mukhopadhyay Veljko Vuj\v{c}i\'c Violetta Sagun Vladimir A. Sre\'ckovi\'c Wangzheng Zhang Yo Toda Yun-Song Piao Zahra Davari
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 22:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords cosmological tensionsHubble constantsystematicsnew physicsLambda-CDMdark energycosmic microwave backgroundlarge-scale structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cosmological tensions may indicate either unaccounted systematics or new physics beyond the standard model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This white paper examines the differences in measurements of key cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant across various probes. It argues that these tensions could arise from systematics in observations or signal the need for physics beyond the Lambda-CDM framework. The authors identify main objectives for the next decade along with science projects aimed at resolving the issues through refined measurements and analysis techniques. They review the principal cosmological probes, discuss potential sources of systematic error, and outline promising new physics scenarios that future surveys might detect.

Core claim

Divergences in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes, but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model. The paper reviews principal probes and potential systematics while discussing the most promising array of new physics and novel data analysis approaches.

What carries the argument

The divergence in measurements of core cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant and matter density parameter, drawn from comparisons between probes including the cosmic microwave background, type Ia supernovae, and large-scale structure surveys.

If this is right

  • Upcoming surveys will deliver higher-precision data capable of distinguishing between systematic explanations and new physics.
  • Models involving modified gravity, dynamical dark energy, or early-universe physics could resolve the observed parameter mismatches.
  • Novel data analysis methods that extend beyond traditional statistical approaches will be required to test physical models rigorously.
  • A combination of improved control over systematics and targeted searches for new physics will determine the origin of the discordances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation of new physics would likely require corresponding adjustments in particle physics models and early-universe scenarios.
  • Systematic cross-correlation of independent probes offers a route to isolate whether tensions are measurement artifacts.
  • Resolving the tensions could alter predictions for the universe's late-time acceleration and structure growth.

Load-bearing premise

That the reported parameter divergences reflect genuine physical inconsistencies rather than residual unmodeled systematics or statistical fluctuations in the current data sets.

What would settle it

A future high-precision campaign in which all major cosmological probes converge on a single consistent set of Lambda-CDM parameter values without requiring additional systematic corrections or new physics.

read the original abstract

The standard model of cosmology has provided a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations both at astrophysical and cosmological scales for several decades. This concordance model is constructed by a universal cosmological constant and supported by a matter sector described by the standard model of particle physics and a cold dark matter contribution, as well as very early-time inflationary physics, and underpinned by gravitation through general relativity. There have always been open questions about the soundness of the foundations of the standard model. However, recent years have shown that there may also be questions from the observational sector with the emergence of differences between certain cosmological probes. In this White Paper, we identify the key objectives that need to be addressed over the coming decade together with the core science projects that aim to meet these challenges. These discordances primarily rest on the divergence in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence. These possible statistical tensions may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model. After reviewing the principal probes used in the measurement of cosmological parameters, as well as potential systematics, we discuss the most promising array of potential new physics that may be observable in upcoming surveys. We also discuss the growing set of novel data analysis approaches that go beyond traditional methods to test physical models. [Abridged]

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a white paper reviewing the standard cosmological model and cataloging observational tensions in key parameters (e.g., Hubble constant, S8) measured across probes such as CMB, supernovae, BAO, and weak lensing. It surveys candidate systematics in these measurements, discusses possible extensions beyond the standard model, and outlines principal science objectives plus core projects for the coming decade to distinguish systematics from new physics.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the paper provides a timely, structured roadmap that consolidates the current status of tensions and candidate resolutions. Its value lies in explicitly framing the open question of systematics versus new physics, listing concrete upcoming surveys and analysis methods, and avoiding over-claim on any single resolution. This serves the community by guiding coordinated efforts without introducing new derivations or fits.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the parenthetical reference to an 'Abridged' version should be removed or clarified in the final published form so readers know the scope of the full text.
  2. [Section on novel data analysis approaches] The discussion of novel data-analysis approaches would benefit from a short table or bullet list cross-referencing each method to the specific tension(s) it targets, improving readability for non-specialist readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately reflects the scope of the white paper as a compilation of observational tensions and a roadmap for distinguishing systematics from new physics in the coming decade.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review paper with no internal derivations

full rationale

This is a review/white paper that catalogs existing observational tensions from external data sets, surveys candidate systematics, and outlines a research roadmap without advancing any original derivations, equations, or quantitative predictions. All statements reference prior measurements and models with explicit caveats on statistical fluctuations and unmodeled systematics; no claim reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation chain defined within the manuscript itself. The central possibility (tensions from systematics or new physics) is presented as an open question rather than a demonstrated result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and introduces no new free parameters, axioms beyond standard cosmology, or invented entities; it discusses possible extensions as open questions rather than postulates.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Lambda-CDM model provides a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations
    Stated explicitly in the opening paragraph of the abstract as the concordance model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 8584 in / 1148 out tokens · 40306 ms · 2026-05-14T22:50:24.942171+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.DimensionForcing dimension_forced unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    These discordances primarily rest on the divergence in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence. These possible statistical tensions may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model.

  • IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.PhiForcing phi_forcing unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    After reviewing the principal probes used in the measurement of cosmological parameters, as well as potential systematics, we discuss the most promising array of potential new physics that may be observable in upcoming surveys.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 23 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GI BAO as a cosmological consistency check

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GI BAO provides a robust consistency check for density BAO and shear data, with the first photometric measurement on DES Y3 showing agreement at α = 0.966 ± 0.252.

  2. Measuring neutrino mass and asymmetry through galaxy pairwise peculiar velocity

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Galaxy pairwise peculiar velocities from Cosmicflows-4 yield M_ν = 0.24^{+0.34}_{-0.18} eV and η² = 2.14^{+0.30}_{-0.32} (7σ non-zero asymmetry) in the CMB framework, consistent with prior Planck results.

  3. First-order thermodynamics of multi-scalar-tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Multi-scalar-tensor gravity admits an exact covariant thermodynamic interpretation as an imperfect fluid whose heat flux involves a coupling-derived factor χ and a residual gradient sector, yielding multi-field therma...

  4. Cosmologically viable non-polynomial quasi-topological gravity: explicit models, $\Lambda$CDM limit and observational constraints

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-polynomial quasi-topological gravity models reproduce the standard thermal history, generate dynamical dark energy of geometric origin, and fit supernova, cosmic chronometer, and BAO data competitively with ΛCDM.

  5. On the origin of the environmental step: A BayeSN view of the ZTF SN Ia DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    BayeSN analysis of ZTF SN Ia DR2 data shows a persistent ~0.1 mag environmental step that is intrinsic to the supernovae, not explained by differing dust properties.

  6. Geometric Constraints on the Pre-Recombination Expansion History from the Hubble Tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Model-independent reconstruction shows that early-universe modifications resolving the Hubble tension exist at the background level, requiring a smooth ~15% pre-recombination expansion rate enhancement.

  7. Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Two-field axion-like early dark energy reduces Hubble tension to 1.5 sigma residual and improves high-ell CMB fits over single-field models.

  8. Observational Tests for Distinguishing Classes of Cosmological Models

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new null test is proposed to isolate cosmologies with non-FLRW observational relations by characterizing how they violate curvature-consistency tests of the standard FLRW framework.

  9. Thermal channels of scalar and tensor waves in Jordan-frame scalar--tensor gravity

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Scalar and tensor perturbations in Jordan-frame scalar-tensor gravity admit an exact linear-order Eckart effective-fluid description, with gravitational-wave damping governed by the scalar sector's transverse-traceles...

  10. On the origin of the environmental step: A BayeSN view of the ZTF SN Ia DR2

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    BayeSN analysis of ZTF Type Ia supernovae confirms a ~0.1 mag intrinsic environmental step in standardized brightness that is not explained by differences in dust extinction properties.

  11. Cosmological Dynamics of a Non-Canonical Generalised Brans-Dicke Theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A non-canonical generalized Brans-Dicke theory admits background cosmological solutions matching Lambda CDM characteristics for constant, power-law, and exponential potentials, with dynamics distinct from other scalar...

  12. Noether charges and the first law of thermodynamics for multifractional Schwarzschild black hole in the q-derivative theory

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Multi-fractional Schwarzschild black holes have profile-insensitive Noether mass and geometric area-law entropy, but require an extended first law with work terms for the q-profile parameters to restore integrability ...

  13. Alleviating the Hubble Tension Using $\Lambda$sCDM Model: A Coupled Dark Energy - Dark Matter Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The ΛsCDM model with coupled dark sectors reduces the Hubble tension to 1.2σ via late-time expansion changes while keeping the early-universe sound horizon nearly unchanged.

  14. Cosmological intercept tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tensions in the supernova intercept a_B at z~0.01 in PantheonPlus and z~0.1 in DES-Y5 point to data systematics or inter-survey inconsistencies rather than new physics, aligning H0 measurements and reducing support fo...

  15. The End of the First Act: Spectral Running, Interacting Dark Radiation, and the Hubble Tension in Light of ACT DR6 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Including spectral running α_s, β_s and self-interacting dark radiation relaxes the ACT DR6 bound on ΔN_eff to <0.58 and lowers the Hubble tension to 2.2σ with three extra parameters.

  16. Generalizing the CPL Parametrization through Dark Sector Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dynamical couplings in interacting dark energy models reduce deviations from LambdaCDM to 1.3-1.5 sigma and yield no Bayesian preference over the standard model.

  17. Cosmological Impact of Redshift-Dependent Type Ia Supernovae Calibration

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A phenomenological redshift-dependent SNIa magnitude correction shows no evidence in ΛCDM but is preferred at 4.3σ with dynamical dark energy, reducing Hubble tension to 1.5σ.

  18. A barotropic alternative to Early Dark Energy for alleviating the $H_0$ tension

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A barotropic fluid with ω_s ≈ 0.29 and Ω_s ≈ 1.5×10^{-5} raises the inferred H0 to match SH0ES while remaining consistent with Planck CMB, DESI BAO, and Pantheon data.

  19. Do equation of state parametrizations of dark energy faithfully capture the dynamics of the late universe?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Node-based reconstruction of cosmic expansion prefers stronger deceleration at z≈1.7 than smooth DE EoS parametrizations, isolating z~1.5-2 as a window where the latter may compress localized kinematic features permit...

  20. Is the $w_0w_a$CDM cosmological parameterization evidence for dark energy dynamics partially caused by the excess smoothing of Planck PR4 CMB anisotropy data?

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Planck PR4 CMB data mildly favors dynamical dark energy, but this preference weakens when accounting for possible excess smoothing, indicating the signal may partly arise from data processing issues.

  21. Alleviating the Hubble Tension Using $\Lambda$sCDM Model: A Coupled Dark Energy - Dark Matter Interaction

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The ΛsCDM interacting dark sector model reduces the Hubble tension to 1.2σ via late-time energy transfer from dark matter to dark energy while leaving the sound horizon nearly unchanged.

  22. Cosmological constraints on the big bang quantum cosmology model

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The JCDM model yields H0 of 66.95 plus or minus 0.51 km/s/Mpc and Omega_m of 0.3419 plus or minus 0.0065 in a flat universe, rising to H0 of 69.13 plus or minus 0.56 with slight positive curvature, fitting late-time d...

  23. Machine Learning for Multi-messenger Probes of New Physics and Cosmology: A Review and Perspective

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A review summarizing machine learning methods for multi-messenger probes of dark matter and new physics, with a proposed plan for future integrated analyses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 21 Pith papers · 24 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite,

    L. Amendolaet al., “Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite,”Living Rev. Rel.21 (2018) no. 1, 2, arXiv:1606.00180 [astro-ph.CO]

  2. [2]

    Extragalactic Science, Cosmology and Galactic Archaeology with the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS)

    M. Takada, R. S. Ellis, M. Chiba, J. E. Greene, H. Aihara, N. Arimoto, K. Bundy, J. Cohen, O. Doré, G. Graves, J. E. Gunn, T. Heckman, C. M. Hirata, P. Ho, J.-P. Kneib, O. Le Fèvre, L. Lin, S. More, H. Murayama, T. Nagao, M. Ouchi, M. Seiffert, J. D. Silverman, L. Sodré, D. N. Spergel, M. A. Strauss, H. Sugai, Y. Suto, H. Takami, and R. Wyse, “Extragalact...

  3. [3]

    Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru Telescope: Overview, recent progress, and future perspectives

    N. Tamuraet al., “Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) for the Subaru Telescope: Overview, recent progress, and future perspectives,”Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.9908 (2016) 99081M, arXiv:1608.01075 [astro-ph.IM]

  4. [4]

    Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Rubin Observatory after LSST,

    B. Blumet al., “Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Rubin Observatory after LSST,” inSnowmass 2021

  5. [5]

    arXiv:2203.07220 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array,

    R. Braun, T. L. Bourke, J. A. Green, E. Keane, and J. Wagg, “Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array,”PoS AASKA14 (2015) 174

  7. [7]

    A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5,

    DESI Collaboration, D. J. Schlegelet al., “A Spectroscopic Road Map for Cosmic Frontier: DESI, DESI-II, Stage-5,” arXiv:2209.03585 [astro-ph.CO]

  8. [8]

    4MOST - 4-metre Multi-Object Spectroscopic Telescope

    R. S. de Jonget al., “4MOST: 4-metre multi-object spectroscopic telescope,” inGround-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, and H. Takami, eds., vol. 8446 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, p. 84460T. 2012.arXiv:1206.6885 [astro-ph.IM]

  9. [9]

    Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey

    SPHEREx Collaboration, O. Doréet al., “Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey,” arXiv:1412.4872 [astro-ph.CO]

  10. [10]

    COMAP Early Science: I. Overview,

    K. A. Clearyet al., “COMAP Early Science: I. Overview,”arXiv:2111.05927 [astro-ph.CO]

  11. [11]

    Packed Ultra-wideband Mapping Array (PUMA): A Radio Telescope for Cosmology and Transients,

    PUMA Collaboration, A. Slosaret al., “Packed Ultra-wideband Mapping Array (PUMA): A Radio Telescope for Cosmology and Transients,”Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51 (2019) 53, arXiv:1907.12559 [astro-ph.IM]

  12. [12]

    The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview

    DES Collaboration, T. Abbottet al., “The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.460 (2016) no. 2, 1270–1299,arXiv:1601.00329 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [13]

    Overview, design, and flight results from SuperBIT: a high-resolution, wide-field, visible-to-near-UV balloon-borne astronomical telescope

    L. J. Romualdezet al., “Overview, design, and flight results from SuperBIT: a high-resolution, wide-field, visible-to-near-UV balloon-borne astronomical telescope,” inGround-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, C. J. Evans, L. Simard, and H. Takami, eds., vol. 10702 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Se...

  14. [14]

    Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope

    B. Sathyaprakashet al., “Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope,”Class. Quant. Grav.29 (2012) 124013, arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc] . [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 079501 (2013)]

  15. [15]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope

    A. Abacet al., “The Science of the Einstein Telescope,”arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M. Punturoet al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,”Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

  17. [17]

    ETpathfinder: a cryogenic testbed for interferometric gravitational-wave detectors,

    A. Utinaet al., “ETpathfinder: a cryogenic testbed for interferometric gravitational-wave detectors,”Class. Quant. Grav.39 (2022) no. 21, 215008,arXiv:2206.04905 [astro-ph.IM]

  18. [18]

    Listening to the Universe with next generation ground-based 404 gravitational-wave detectors,

    S. Borhanian and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Listening to the Universe with next generation ground-based 404 gravitational-wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) no. 8, 083040,arXiv:2202.11048 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: from A♯ to cosmic explorer,

    I. Guptaet al., “Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: from A♯ to cosmic explorer,”Class. Quant. Grav.41 (2024) no. 24, 245001,arXiv:2307.10421 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology,

    TianQin Collaboration, J. Meiet al., “The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology,”PTEP 2021 (2021) no. 5, 05A107,arXiv:2008.10332 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin,

    J. Luoet al., “Fundamental Physics and Cosmology with TianQin,”arXiv:2502.20138 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    Taiji data challenge for exploring gravitational wave universe,

    Z. Ren, T. Zhao, Z. Cao, Z.-K. Guo, W.-B. Han, H.-B. Jin, and Y.-L. Wu, “Taiji data challenge for exploring gravitational wave universe,”Front. Phys. (Beijing)18 (2023) no. 6, 64302,arXiv:2301.02967 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    Kawamura et al., PTEP2021, 05A105 (2021), arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

    S. Kawamuraet al., “Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO,”PTEP 2021 (2021) no. 5, 05A105,arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,”Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023) no. 1, L8,arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [25]

    The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project

    R. N. Manchester, G. Hobbs, M. Bailes, W. A. Coles, W. van Straten, M. J. Keith, R. M. Shannon, N. D. R. Bhat, A. Brown, S. G. Burke-Spolaor, D. J. Champion, A. Chaudhary, R. T. Edwards, G. Hampson, A. W. Hotan, A. Jameson, F. A. Jenet, M. J. Kesteven, J. Khoo, J. Kocz, K. Maciesiak, S. Oslowski, V. Ravi, J. R. Reynolds, J. M. Sarkissian, J. P. W. Verbies...

  26. [26]

    The International Pulsar Timing Array

    R. N. Manchester and IPTA, “The International Pulsar Timing Array,”Classical and Quantum Gravity30 (2013) no. 22, 224010,arXiv:1309.7392 [astro-ph.IM]

  27. [27]

    Science with the Murchison Widefield Array: Phase I results and Phase II opportunities,

    A. P. Beardsleyet al., “Science with the Murchison Widefield Array: Phase I results and Phase II opportunities,”Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust.36 (2019) e050, arXiv:1910.02895 [astro-ph.IM]

  28. [28]

    Radio Antenna Design for Sky-Averaged 21cm Cosmology Experiments: The REACH Case,

    J. Cumneret al., “Radio Antenna Design for Sky-Averaged 21cm Cosmology Experiments: The REACH Case,”J. Astron. Inst.11 (2022) no. 01, 2250001,arXiv:2109.10098 [astro-ph.IM]

  29. [29]

    The GMRT 150 MHz All-sky Radio Survey: First Alternative Data Release TGSS ADR1

    H. T. Intema, P. Jagannathan, K. P. Mooley, and D. A. Frail, “The GMRT 150 MHz All-sky Radio Survey: First Alternative Data Release TGSS ADR1,”Astron. Astrophys.598 (2017) A78, arXiv:1603.04368 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    The Five-Hundred-Meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (FAST) Project

    R. Nan, D. Li, C. Jin, Q. Wang, L. Zhu, W. Zhu, H. Zhang, Y. Yue, and L. Qian, “The Five-Hundred Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope (fast) Project,”International Journal of Modern Physics D20 (2011) no. 6, 989–1024, arXiv:1105.3794 [astro-ph.IM]

  31. [31]

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives

    M. J. Grahamet al., “The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives,”Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.131 (2019) no. 1001, 078001,arXiv:1902.01945 [astro-ph.IM]

  32. [32]

    The Nearby Supernova Factory

    W. M. Wood-Vaseyet al., “The nearby supernova factory,”New Astron. Rev.48 (2004) 637–640, arXiv:astro-ph/0401513

  33. [33]

    ATLAS Probe: Breakthrough Science of Galaxy Evolution, Cosmology, Milky Way, and the Solar System,

    Y. Wanget al., “ATLAS Probe: Breakthrough Science of Galaxy Evolution, Cosmology, Milky Way, and the Solar System,”arXiv:1909.00070 [astro-ph.IM]

  34. [34]

    The Science Case for the European ELT,

    I. Hook, “The Science Case for the European ELT,” inScience with the VLT in the ELT Era, A. Moorwood, ed., vol. 9 of Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, p. 225. 2009

  35. [35]

    Key early science with MANIFEST on GMT

    M. Colless, “Key early science with MANIFEST on GMT,”arXiv e-prints(2018) arXiv:1809.05804, arXiv:1809.05804 [astro-ph.IM]

  36. [36]

    Thirty Meter Telescope Detailed Science Case: 2015,

    TMT International Science Development Teams & TMT Science Advisory CommitteeCollaboration, W. Skidmoreet al., “Thirty Meter Telescope Detailed Science Case: 2015,”Res. Astron. Astrophys.15 (2015) no. 12, 1945–2140,arXiv:1505.01195 [astro-ph.IM]

  37. [37]

    E. V. L. Telescope,The VLT White Book. European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, 1988. https://www.eso.org/public/products/books/book_0004/

  38. [38]

    Parque Astron\'omico de Atacama: An ideal site for millimeter, submillimeter, and mid-infrared astronomy

    R. Bustos, M. Rubio, A. Otárola, and N. Nagar, “Parque Astronómico de Atacama: An Ideal Site for Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Mid-Infrared Astronomy,”PASP126 (2014) no. 946, 1126,arXiv:1410.2451 [astro-ph.IM]

  39. [39]

    Science Objectives and Early Results of the DEEP2 Redshift Survey

    M. Daviset al., “Science objectives and early results of the DEEP2 redshift survey,”Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 4834 (2003) 161–172,arXiv:astro-ph/0209419

  40. [40]

    Science with ASKAP - the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder

    S. Johnston and J. Wall, “Science with ASKAP - the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder,”Exper. Astron. 22 (2008) 151, arXiv:0810.5187 [astro-ph]

  41. [41]

    The UTMOST: A hybrid digital signal processor transforms the MOST

    M. Bailes, A. Jameson, C. Flynn, T. Bateman, E. D. Barr, S. Bhandari, J. D. Bunton, M. Caleb, D. Campbell-Wilson, W. Farah, B. Gaensler, A. J. Green, R. W. Hunstead, F. Jankowski, E. F. Keane, V. V. Krishnan, T. Murphy, M. O’Neill, S. Osłowski, A. Parthasarathy, V. Ravi, P. Rosado, and D. Temby, “The UTMOST: A Hybrid Digital Signal Processor Transforms th...

  42. [42]

    The MeerKAT Radio Telescope,

    J. Jonas and MeerKAT Team, “The MeerKAT Radio Telescope,” inMeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA, p. 1. 2016

  43. [43]

    Deep Synoptic Array Science: First FRB and Host Galaxy Catalog,

    C. J. Lawet al., “Deep Synoptic Array Science: First FRB and Host Galaxy Catalog,”Astrophys. J.967 (2024) no. 1, 29, arXiv:2307.03344 [astro-ph.HE]

  44. [44]

    The VLA Low-band Ionosphere and Transient Experiment (VLITE),

    T. Clarke, W. Peters, W. Brisken, S. Giacintucci, N. Kassim, E. Polisensky, J. Helmboldt, E. E. Richards, A. Erickson, P. S. Ray, M. T. Kerr, J. Deneva, W. Coburn, R. Huber, and J. Long, “The VLA Low-band Ionosphere and Transient Experiment (VLITE),” inAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #231, vol. 231 ofAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting A...

  45. [45]

    The DSA-2000: the future of radio survey science,

    G. Hallinan and DSA-2000 collaboration, “The DSA-2000: the future of radio survey science,” inAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, vol. 241 ofAmerican Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, p. 239.07. 2023

  46. [46]

    Apercal-The Apertif calibration pipeline,

    B. Adebahret al., “Apercal-The Apertif calibration pipeline,”Astronomy and Computing38 (2022) 100514, arXiv:2112.03722 [astro-ph.IM]

  47. [47]

    The Canadian Hydrogen Observatory and Radio-transient Detector (CHORD),

    K. Vanderlinde, A. Liu, B. Gaensler, D. Bond, G. Hinshaw, C. Ng, C. Chiang, I. Stairs, J.-A. Brown, J. Sievers, J. Mena, K. Smith, K. Bandura, K. Masui, K. Spekkens, L. Belostotski, M. Dobbs, N. Turok, P. Boyle, M. Rupen, T. Landecker, U.-L. Pen, and V. Kaspi, “The Canadian Hydrogen Observatory and Radio-transient Detector (CHORD),” inCanadian Long Range ...

  48. [48]

    The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX): Description and Early Pilot Survey Results

    G. J. Hillet al., “The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX): Description and Early Pilot Survey Results,”ASP Conf. Ser.399 (2008) 115–118,arXiv:0806.0183 [astro-ph]

  49. [49]

    CONCERTO: Instrument and status,

    A. Fasanoet al., “CONCERTO: Instrument and status,”EPJ Web Conf.293 (2024) 00018, arXiv:2311.04704 [astro-ph.IM]

  50. [50]

    TIME: the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment: an update on design, characterization, and data from the 2022 commissioning observations,

    V. L. Butleret al., “TIME: the Tomographic Ionized-carbon Mapping Experiment: an update on design, characterization, and data from the 2022 commissioning observations,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XII, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, eds., vol. 13102 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engi...

  51. [51]

    CDIM: Cosmic Dawn Intensity Mapper Final Report

    A. Cooray, T.-C. Chang, S. Unwin, M. Zemcov, A. Coffey, P. Morrissey, N. Raouf, S. Lipscy, M. Shannon, G. Wu, R. Cen, R. R. Chary, O. Doré, X. Fan, G. G. Fazio, S. L. Finkelstein, C. Heneka, B. Lee, P. Linden, H. Nayyeri, J. Rhodes, R. Sadoun, M. B. Silva, H. Trac, H.-Y. Wu, and Z. Zheng, “Cosmic Dawn Intensity Mapper,” inBulletin of the American Astronom...

  52. [52]

    CCAT-prime: Science with an Ultra-widefield Submillimeter Observatory at Cerro Chajnantor

    G. J. Staceyet al., “CCAT-prime: Science with an Ultra-widefield Submillimeter Observatory at Cerro Chajnantor,” in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VII. 2018. arXiv:1807.04354 [astro-ph.GA]

  53. [53]

    The Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA): Design, Technical Overview and Performance

    W. Sutherland, J. Emerson, G. Dalton, E. Atad-Ettedgui, S. Beard, R. Bennett, N. Bezawada, A. Born, M. Caldwell, P. Clark, S. Craig, D. Henry, P. Jeffers, B. Little, A. McPherson, J. Murray, M. Stewart, B. Stobie, D. Terrett, K. Ward, M. Whalley, and G. Woodhouse, “The Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA): Design, technical overview...

  54. [54]

    The limits of cosmology: role of the Moon,

    J. Silk, “The limits of cosmology: role of the Moon,”Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.379 (2021) 20190561, arXiv:2011.04671 [astro-ph.CO] . 406 White Paper Authors Eleonora Di Valentino,1 Jackson Levi Said,2,3 Adam Riess,4,5 Agnieszka Pollo,6 Vivian Poulin,7 Adrià Gómez-Valent,8 Amanda Weltman,9 Antonella Palmese,10 Caroline D. Huang,11 Carsten van de...