arxiv: 2604.16907 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-18 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

First-order thermodynamics of multi-scalar-tensor gravity

David S. Pereira

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th

keywords multi-scalar-tensor gravityJordan framefirst-order thermodynamicsimperfect fluidheat flux decompositionGR attractorentropy productionhomogeneous cosmology

0 comments

The pith

The thermodynamic description of multi-scalar-tensor gravity cannot generically reduce to a single KT-type quantity because misaligned scalar directions produce a non-vanishing spatial residual in the comoving frame.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from the Einstein-like field equations of Jordan-frame tensor-multi-scalar gravity and performs an exact covariant 1+3 decomposition that interprets the geometric sector as an effective imperfect fluid. It derives an exact expression for the heat flux q_a^{(g)} = -χ(a_a + W_a) where χ depends on the time derivative of the nonminimal coupling function F(φ^C). In the F-comoving frame this splits into an inertial term χ_F ≡ K_F T_F together with a residual spatial vector W_a^{(F)} that is sourced by scalar-field directions not aligned with the coupling. The resulting diagnostics 𝔇_χ and 𝔇_grad then distinguish the time-like and spatial multi-scalar sectors and establish a precise criterion for when the theory approaches general relativity. The construction also supplies transport equations and an entropy current whose production remains nontrivial even in homogeneous cosmologies where spatial contributions are suppressed.

Core claim

From the Einstein-like field equations of Jordan-frame tensor-multi-scalar gravity, the exact 1+3 decomposition yields the heat flux q_a^{(g)} = -χ(a_a + W_a) with χ = -Ḟ/(8π F). In the F-comoving frame this becomes the inertial variable χ_F ≡ K_F T_F together with a generally non-vanishing spatial contribution W_a^{(F)} sourced by scalar directions not aligned with the coupling, demonstrating that the multi-scalar thermodynamic description is not generically reducible to a single KT-type quantity. Transport equations are obtained for χ_F, the field-space thermal vector χ^A and covector χ_A, and the residual gradient sector. The diagnostics 𝔇_χ = χ_A χ^A and 𝔇_grad = B_AB D_a^{(F)} φ^A D^a_(

What carries the argument

The F-comoving frame decomposition of the heat flux into χ_F and the residual spatial vector W_a^{(F)}, together with the scalar diagnostics 𝔇_χ and 𝔇_grad that quantify the full time-like and spatial multi-scalar sectors.

If this is right

Transport equations govern the evolution of χ_F, the field-space thermal vector χ^A, and the residual gradient sector.
The GR-attractor criterion shows that freezing the effective coupling is weaker than full relaxation to the GR sector.
An entropy current and entropy production can be constructed in the coupling frame.
Homogeneous cosmology suppresses the spatial sector while retaining nontrivial time-like multi-scalar thermal dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The non-reducibility may imply richer dissipative behavior in gravitational-wave propagation or in the thermodynamics of compact objects sourced by multiple scalars.
Applying the diagnostics to concrete multi-scalar inflation or dark-energy models could reveal observable deviations from single-field thermodynamic predictions.
Extending the framework to inhomogeneous cosmologies would test whether spatial multi-scalar residuals influence structure formation.
The same decomposition technique could be tested on other modified-gravity actions that admit multiple scalar degrees of freedom.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation begins from the Einstein-like field equations of Jordan-frame tensor-multi-scalar gravity; if the underlying action or field equations deviate from this assumed form, the exact heat-flux expression and subsequent diagnostics no longer hold.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of W_a^{(F)} in a two-scalar model where the coupling function depends on only one scalar field, checking whether the spatial residual vanishes identically or remains nonzero for generic initial data.

read the original abstract

We formulate a first-order thermodynamic description of Jordan-frame tensor--multi-scalar gravity. From the Einstein-like field equations we obtain the exact covariant $1+3$ decomposition of the geometric sector and interpret it as an effective imperfect fluid. In a generic frame, the heat flux can be written exactly as $q_a^{(g)}=-\chi(a_a+W_a)$, with $\chi=-\dot{\FF}/(8\pi\FF)$, where $\FF=\FF(\phi^C)$ is the nonminimal coupling function, and with $W_a$ the residual temperature-gradient sector. In the $\FF$-comoving frame this yields the inertial variable $\chi_{\FF}\equiv K_{\FF}T_{\FF}$ together with a generally nonvanishing spatial contribution $W_a^{(\FF)}$ sourced by scalar directions not aligned with the coupling, showing that the multi-field thermodynamic description is not generically reducible to a single $KT$-type quantity. We derive transport equations for $\chi_{\FF}$, for the field-space thermal vector $\chi^A$ and covector $\chi_A$, and for the residual gradient sector. We further introduce the scalar diagnostics $\mathfrak D_\chi=\chi_A\chi^A$ and $\mathfrak D_{\rm grad}=\mathcal{B}_{AB}\D_a^{(\FF)}\phi^A\D^a_{(\FF)}\phi^B$, where $\mathcal{B}_{AB}$ is the field-space kinetic matrix of the multi-scalar theory and $\D_a^{(\FF)}$ is the covariant derivative projected orthogonally to the $\FF$-comoving 4-velocity. These diagnostics characterize the full time-like and spatial multi-scalar sectors and lead to a precise GR-attractor criterion: freezing the effective coupling is, in general, weaker than full relaxation to the GR sector. Finally, we construct the entropy current and entropy production in the coupling frame and show that homogeneous cosmology suppresses the spatial sector while retaining nontrivial time-like multi-scalar thermal dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper cleanly extends the single-scalar thermodynamic picture to multi-scalar-tensor gravity with exact 1+3 decompositions and new diagnostics that show the multi-field case does not reduce to the old KT form.

read the letter

The main point is that Pereira derives an exact first-order thermodynamic description for Jordan-frame tensor-multi-scalar gravity straight from the Einstein-like field equations. The heat flux comes out as q_a^{(g)} = -χ (a_a + W_a) with χ = -Ḟ/(8πF), and in the F-comoving frame the extra W_a term from misaligned scalar gradients stays around, so the setup does not fold back into a single effective temperature the way the single-field version does. That non-reducibility is the clearest new result. The paper also introduces the field-space thermal vector χ^A and covector χ_A, the diagnostics D_χ = χ_A χ^A and D_grad built from the kinetic matrix and projected gradients, and transport equations for all of them obtained by covariant differentiation along the frame. The GR-attractor criterion is stated precisely: freezing the coupling is weaker than full relaxation to the GR sector. The entropy current construction follows the imperfect-fluid interpretation without extra steps. All of this is done directly from the standard action, with no circular definitions or fitted parameters, and the algebra holds up without internal gaps. The soft spots are small and mostly practical. The results are frame-dependent by design, so anyone using them will have to choose the frame carefully for their model. The note on homogeneous cosmology suppressing the spatial sector is stated but not illustrated with a concrete example, so the size of the new terms in inflation or dark-energy settings is still open. This is for people already working with thermodynamic methods in modified gravity or multi-field cosmologies. A reader who needs effective-fluid language for those models will find the diagnostics and the non-reducibility result useful to check against their own setups. It deserves peer review; the derivations are direct and the new elements are clearly defined.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript formulates a first-order thermodynamic description of Jordan-frame tensor-multi-scalar gravity. From the Einstein-like field equations it derives an exact covariant 1+3 decomposition of the geometric sector as an imperfect fluid, obtaining the heat flux q_a^{(g)} = -χ(a_a + W_a) with χ = -Ḟ/(8πF). In the F-comoving frame this yields the inertial variable χ_F ≡ K_F T_F together with a generally non-vanishing residual W_a^{(F)} sourced by scalar gradients not aligned with ∇F, showing that the multi-field description is not generically reducible to a single KT-type quantity. Transport equations are obtained for χ_F, the field-space vectors χ^A and χ_A, and the residual gradient sector; scalar diagnostics 𝔇_χ = χ_A χ^A and 𝔇_grad = B_AB D_a^{(F)} φ^A D^a_{(F)} φ^B are introduced to characterize the time-like and spatial multi-scalar sectors and to formulate a GR-attractor criterion. An entropy current and its production are constructed in the coupling frame, with the observation that homogeneous cosmology suppresses the spatial sector while retaining nontrivial time-like dynamics.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies an exact, covariant, parameter-free thermodynamic framework for multi-scalar-tensor theories that makes the irreducible multi-field contributions explicit. The demonstration that W_a^{(F)} is generically nonzero, the transport equations, and the diagnostics 𝔇_χ and 𝔇_grad provide concrete tools for analyzing relaxation to general relativity in cosmological settings. The construction is strengthened by its direct origin in the standard Jordan-frame field equations, the absence of ad-hoc truncations, and the clear separation of time-like versus spatial multi-scalar effects.

major comments (1)

[section introducing the diagnostics and GR-attractor criterion] The GR-attractor criterion (stated after the introduction of 𝔇_χ and 𝔇_grad) asserts that freezing the effective coupling is weaker than full relaxation to the GR sector. The precise logical status of this criterion—whether it is necessary, sufficient, or only indicative—should be stated explicitly, together with the role played by the residual W_a^{(F)} term in inhomogeneous cases.

minor comments (3)

The coupling function is denoted both as F and as FF (in LaTeX). Consistent use of a single symbol throughout the text and equations would improve readability.
[diagnostics section] The field-space kinetic matrix B_AB and the projected derivative D_a^{(F)} appear in the definition of 𝔇_grad; both should be defined explicitly before their first use in the diagnostics section.
[homogeneous cosmology discussion] The statement that homogeneous cosmology suppresses the spatial sector is made in the abstract and conclusion; an explicit reduction of the transport equations or entropy production under homogeneity would make this claim easier to verify.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. The manuscript is strengthened by the suggested clarification, which we will incorporate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [section introducing the diagnostics and GR-attractor criterion] The GR-attractor criterion (stated after the introduction of 𝔇_χ and 𝔇_grad) asserts that freezing the effective coupling is weaker than full relaxation to the GR sector. The precise logical status of this criterion—whether it is necessary, sufficient, or only indicative—should be stated explicitly, together with the role played by the residual W_a^{(F)} term in inhomogeneous cases.

Authors: We agree that the logical status of the GR-attractor criterion requires explicit statement. In the revised manuscript we will clarify that full relaxation to the GR sector occurs if and only if both diagnostics vanish simultaneously: 𝔇_χ = 0 (time-like sector) and 𝔇_grad = 0 (spatial sector). Freezing the effective coupling corresponds to the time-like condition 𝔇_χ → 0 (equivalently, χ_F becoming constant along the flow), which is therefore necessary but not sufficient for the full attractor; the criterion is consequently weaker than complete relaxation. The residual W_a^{(F)} is sourced by the projection of the scalar gradients orthogonal to ∇F; it vanishes identically in homogeneous cosmologies and when all gradients align with the coupling gradient, but remains generically nonzero in inhomogeneous configurations, thereby encoding the active spatial sector that must also relax. This explicit formulation will be added immediately after the definitions of 𝔇_χ and 𝔇_grad. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is direct algebraic decomposition

full rationale

The paper starts from the Einstein-like field equations of Jordan-frame tensor-multi-scalar gravity and performs an exact 1+3 decomposition to obtain q_a^{(g)} = -χ(a_a + W_a) with χ = -Ḟ/(8πF), followed by transport equations via covariant differentiation and projections in the F-comoving frame. All quantities, including the residual W_a^{(F)}, the diagnostics 𝔇_χ and 𝔇_grad, and the entropy current, follow as identities and projections from the input equations without any fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing reliance on unverified self-citations. The multi-scalar aspects are handled by orthogonal projections of scalar gradients, which is a standard covariant technique that does not reduce the output to the input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Einstein-like field equations of Jordan-frame multi-scalar-tensor gravity and introduces derived thermodynamic quantities without additional free parameters or new postulated entities.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The theory is governed by Einstein-like field equations in the Jordan frame
The paper explicitly begins the decomposition from these equations.

invented entities (2)

χ no independent evidence
purpose: Effective factor relating heat flux to acceleration and residual gradients
Defined directly as -Ḟ/(8πF) from the nonminimal coupling function
W_a no independent evidence
purpose: Residual temperature-gradient sector in the heat flux
Appears in the exact decomposition of q_a^(g)

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5652 in / 1519 out tokens · 43579 ms · 2026-05-10T06:59:37.860371+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel.17, 4 (2014), arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014
[2]

Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

E. Berti, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, U. Sperhake, L. C. Stein, N. Wex, K. Yagi, T. Baker,et al., Class. Quant. Grav.32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[3]

Modified Gravity and Cosmology

T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Phys. Rept.513, 1 (2012), arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012
[4]

Akramiet al.(CANTATA),Modified Gravity and Cos- mology

Y. Akramiet al.(CANTATA),Modified Gravity and Cos- mology. An Update by the CANTATA Network, edited by E. N. Saridakis, R. Lazkoz, V. Salzano, P. Vargas Moniz, S. Capozziello, J. Beltrán Jiménez, M. De Laurentis, and G. J. Olmo (Springer, 2021) arXiv:2105.12582 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[5]

The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

E. Di Valentinoet al.(CosmoVerse Network), Phys. Dark Univ.49, 101965 (2025), arXiv:2504.01669 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[6]

Brans and R

C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev.124, 925 (1961)

1961
[7]

G. W. Horndeski, Int. J. Theor. Phys.10, 363 (1974)

1974
[8]

Faraoni,Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity(2004)

V. Faraoni,Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity(2004)

2004
[9]

Damour and G

T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Class. Quant. Grav. 9, 2093 (1992)

2093
[10]

A. L. Berkin and R. W. Hellings, Phys. Rev. D49, 6442 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9401033

work page arXiv 1994
[11]

Graña, Phys

M. Graña, Phys. Rept.423, 91 (2006), arXiv:hep- th/0509003

work page arXiv 2006
[12]

A. A. Starobinsky, S. Tsujikawa, and J. Yokoyama, Nucl. Phys. B610, 383 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0107555 [astro- ph]

work page arXiv 2001
[13]

Wands, Multiple field inflation, Lect

D. Wands, inThe Cosmic Microwave Background and Physics of the Early Universe, Lect. Notes Phys., Vol. 738 (2008) pp. 275–304, arXiv:astro-ph/0702187

work page arXiv 2008
[14]

C. T. Byrnes and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D74, 043529 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0605679

work page arXiv 2006
[15]

D. I. Kaiser, E. A. Mazenc, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. D87, 064004 (2013), arXiv:1210.7487 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2013
[16]

D. I. Kaiser and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 011302 (2014), arXiv:1304.0363 [astro-ph.CO]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[17]

Frame Covariant Nonminimal Multifield Inflation,

S. Karamitsos and A. Pilaftsis, Nucl. Phys. B927, 219 (2018), arXiv:1706.07011 [hep-ph]. 25

work page arXiv 2018
[18]

M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod- Weinstein, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. D97, 023526 (2018), arXiv:1510.08553 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2018
[19]

M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod- Weinstein, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. D97, 023527 (2018), arXiv:1610.08868 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2018
[20]

M. P. DeCross, D. I. Kaiser, A. Prabhu, C. Prescod- Weinstein, and E. I. Sfakianakis, Phys. Rev. D97, 023528 (2018), arXiv:1610.08916 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2018
[21]

Nguyen, J

R. Nguyen, J. van de Vis, E. I. Sfakianakis, J. T. Giblin, and D. I. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 171301 (2019), arXiv:1905.12562 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2019
[22]

Christodoulidis, R

P. Christodoulidis, R. Rosati, and E. I. Sfakianakis, (2025), arXiv:2504.12406 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Bolshakova and S

K. Bolshakova and S. Chervon, (2025), arXiv:2501.01948 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis, and A. Smith, (2026), arXiv:2603.13986 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[25]

Akrami, M

Y. Akrami, M. Sasaki, A. R. Solomon, and V. Vardanyan, Phys. Lett. B819, 136427 (2021), arXiv:2008.13660 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

Smith, M

A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, JCAP12, 058, arXiv:2408.10820 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[27]

Smith, M

A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, JCAP07, 023, arXiv:2410.11099 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[28]

Smith, P

A. Smith, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1008 (2025), arXiv:2505.05450 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Gallego, J

D. Gallego and J. B. Orjuela-Quintana, (2026), arXiv:2603.18341 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[30]

J. L. Rosa, F. S. N. Lobo, and G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124030 (2021), arXiv:2104.10890 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

J. L. Rosa, S. Carloni, J. P. d. S. e. Lemos, and F. S. N. Lobo, Phys. Rev. D95, 124035 (2017), arXiv:1703.03335 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[32]

J. L. Rosa, S. Carloni, and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 101, 104056 (2020), arXiv:1908.07778 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[33]

J. L. Rosa and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D104, 124076 (2021), arXiv:2111.12109 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[34]

J. L. Rosa, J. P. S. Lemos, and F. S. N. Lobo, Phys. Rev. D98, 064054 (2018), arXiv:1808.08975 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[35]

Aliannejadi and Z

R. Aliannejadi and Z. Haghani, Iran. J. Astron. Astrophys. 11, 45 (2024), arXiv:2410.00159 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

M.Hohmann, L.Jarv, P.Kuusk, E.Randla,andO.Vilson, Phys. Rev. D94, 124015 (2016), arXiv:1607.02356 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[37]

Schön and D

O. Schön and D. D. Doneva, Phys. Rev. D105, 064034 (2022), arXiv:2112.07388 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[38]

Gomes, J

C. Gomes, J. L. Rosa, and M. A. S. Pinto, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1359 (2025), arXiv:2506.12870 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

D. S. Pereira, S. Capozziello, F. S. N. Lobo, and J. P. Mi- moso, Phys. Rev. D113, 064055 (2026), arXiv:2511.09208 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[40]

Miranda, P.-A

M. Miranda, P.-A. Graham, and V. Faraoni, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 387 (2023), arXiv:2211.03958 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Imperfect fluid description of modified gravities,

V. Faraoni and J. Coté, Phys. Rev. D98, 084019 (2018), arXiv:1808.02427 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[42]

Faraoni and A

V. Faraoni and A. Giusti, Phys. Rev. D103, L121501 (2021), arXiv:2103.05389 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[43]

Faraoni, A

V. Faraoni, A. Giusti, and A. Mentrelli, Phys. Rev. D 104, 124031 (2021), arXiv:2110.02368 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[44]

Giardino, V

S. Giardino, V. Faraoni, and A. Giusti, JCAP04(04), 053, arXiv:2202.07393 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[45]

Faraoni, S

V. Faraoni, S. Giardino, A. Giusti, and R. Vanderwee, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 24 (2023), arXiv:2208.04051 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[46]

Faraoni and J

V. Faraoni and J. Houle, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 521 (2023), arXiv:2302.01442 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[47]

First-order thermodynamics of scalar-tensor gravity,

S. Giardino and A. Giusti, Ric. Mat.74, 43 (2025), arXiv:2306.01580 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Miranda, S

M. Miranda, S. Giardino, A. Giusti, and L. Heisenberg, Phys. Rev. D109, 124033 (2024), arXiv:2401.10351 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[49]

Houle and V

J. Houle and V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D110, 024067 (2024), arXiv:2404.19470 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Faraoni and A

V. Faraoni and A. Giusti, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211406 (2025), arXiv:2502.18272 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

Faraoni, Phys

V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D112, L021504 (2025), arXiv:2505.08322 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

Giusti, S

A. Giusti, S. Zentarra, L. Heisenberg, and V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D105, 124011 (2022), arXiv:2108.10706 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Faraoni and N

V. Faraoni and N. Veilleux, Phys. Rev. D113, 044030 (2026), arXiv:2511.04941 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[54]

Faraoni and S

V. Faraoni and S. N. Cattivelli, Phys. Rev. D113, 044034 (2026), arXiv:2511.00347 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[55]

Bhattacharyya and S

S. Bhattacharyya and S. SenGupta, Phys. Rev. D113, 064019 (2026), arXiv:2508.14228 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[56]

Eckart, Phys

C. Eckart, Phys. Rev.58, 919 (1940)

1940
[57]

Faraoni, A

V. Faraoni, A. Giusti, S. Jose, and S. Giardino, Phys. Rev. D106, 024049 (2022), arXiv:2206.02046 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[58]

W. A. Hiscock and L. Lindblom, Phys. Rev. D31, 725 (1985)

1985
[59]

Causal Thermodynamics in Relativity

R. Maartens (1996) arXiv:astro-ph/9609119

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1996
[60]

D. S. Pereira and J. P. Mimoso, (2025), arXiv:2512.20553 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[61]

C. G. Tsagas, A. Challinor, and R. Maartens, Phys. Rept. 465, 61 (2008), arXiv:0705.4397 [astro-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[62]

G. F. R. Ellis, Proc. Int. Sch. Phys. Fermi47, 104 (1971)

1971