pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.09656 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-12 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.IM

Photon counting readout for detection and inference of gravitational waves from neutron star merger remnants

Ethan Payne , Lee McCuller , Katerina Chatziioannou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 21:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.IM
keywords gravitational wavesneutron star mergerspostmerger signalsphoton countingquantum noiseneutron star radiusdetector readout
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photon counting readout enables detection of weak postmerger gravitational waves and doubles the precision of neutron star radius measurements after 20,000 signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines an alternative readout method for gravitational wave detectors operating in the quantum-noise-dominated regime above 1 kHz. Simulations show that photon counting converts weak postmerger signals into discrete photon detections, allowing roughly one in 100 signals with signal-to-noise ratio of 0.2 to register as a single photon. After accumulating data from 2 times 10 to the 4 such signals, equivalent to observation periods ranging from weeks to about a year and a half, the method yields a factor-of-two improvement in the uncertainty on the radius of a 1.6 solar mass neutron star. The approach targets information about dense matter that would otherwise remain inaccessible in rare, low-amplitude signals.

Core claim

The authors show that photon counting readout, by measuring signals and noise as quantized photon detections in chosen modes, detects postmerger gravitational wave signals efficiently even at low signal-to-noise ratios and produces a twofold reduction in the uncertainty on the radius of a 1.6 solar mass neutron star after 2 times 10 to the 4 signals.

What carries the argument

Photon counting readout, which registers signals as discrete single-photon detections in a chosen basis of modes instead of continuous homodyne measurements.

If this is right

  • Signals too weak for traditional detection become usable for inference through single-photon events.
  • Tighter constraints on the dense-matter equation of state follow from the improved radius measurements.
  • Reducing classical noise in the detector can tighten the radius bounds even further.
  • The method shortens the observation time needed to reach useful precision on neutron star properties.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same photon-counting approach could apply to other high-frequency gravitational wave sources limited by quantum noise.
  • Practical implementation would require detector hardware that achieves the assumed noise performance without introducing new systematics.
  • Stacking photon-counting results with data from multiple detectors or complementary readout schemes might compound the gains in radius precision.

Load-bearing premise

The simulations assume quantum noise dominates above 1 kHz and that photon counting can be implemented without adding new technical noise or calibration errors that would erase the reported gains.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of radius constraints extracted from the same set of 20,000 simulated postmerger signals processed once with photon counting and once with standard homodyne readout would show whether the twofold improvement materializes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.09656 by Ethan Payne, Katerina Chatziioannou, Lee McCuller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Demonstration of the detection of a BNS post [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Marginal posterior distribution for the damped-sinusoid parameters obtained with the homodyne (orange) and photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Impact of the noise backgrounds for the homodyne (upper; orange) and photon counting (lower; blue) readouts. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Marginal posterior (90% credible levels) for simulated post-merger signals with varying photon counts. As the photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison of photon counting and homodyne as a function of the signal SNR. For reference, the top panel shows the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Marginal posterior distributions for the radius of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational waves emitted after neutron star binary coalescences and the information they carry about dense matter are a high-priority target for next-generation detectors. Even though such detectors are expected to observe millions of signals, detectable postmerger emission will remain rare. In this work, we explore postmerger detectability and inference through an alternative detector readout scheme for data dominated by quantum-noise, which is the case above $1$\,kHz: photon-counting. In such a readout, signals and noise become quantized into discrete distributions corresponding to the detection of single photons measured in a chosen basis of modes. Through simulated data, we demonstrate that photon counting can be efficient even for weak signals. We find ${\sim}1$ in 100 signals with a postmerger signal-to-noise ratio of 0.2 can result in a single photon and thus be detected. Furthermore, after $2\times10^4$ signals -- equivalent to $10^{-2}$ to $1.5$ years of observation -- photon counting results in a twofold improvement in the measurement of the radius of a $1.6\,M_\odot$ neutron star. Constraints can be further tightened if the detector classical noise is reduced. Photon counting offers a promising alternative to traditional homodyne readout techniques for extracting information from low signal-to-noise ratio postmerger signals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes photon counting readout as an alternative to homodyne detection for gravitational waves from neutron star post-merger remnants in the quantum-noise-dominated regime above 1 kHz. Through forward simulations of photon statistics, it shows that weak signals (SNR 0.2) produce a detectable photon in roughly 1 out of 100 cases, and that after 2×10^4 such signals (equivalent to 0.01–1.5 years of observation) photon counting yields a twofold improvement in the inferred radius of a 1.6 M_⊙ neutron star relative to homodyne readout, with further gains possible if classical noise is reduced.

Significance. If the simulated improvement survives realistic detector imperfections, the result would be significant for next-generation gravitational-wave observatories. It offers a concrete path to extract equation-of-state information from the rare, low-SNR post-merger signals that will remain the dominant limitation even when millions of binary mergers are observed. The work also demonstrates that photon counting can be efficient for signals far below the usual detection threshold, which is a useful technical insight for quantum-noise-limited interferometry.

major comments (1)
  1. [Simulation results on radius inference] The twofold radius improvement after exactly 2×10^4 signals (abstract) is obtained from forward simulation of ideal photon-counting statistics versus homodyne readout. The manuscript does not quantify how much additional technical noise, optical losses, dark counts, or mode mismatch can be tolerated before the reported factor-of-two gain disappears. Because the central claim is that photon counting produces a net improvement in the 1.6 M_⊙ radius posterior, this robustness check is load-bearing and must be supplied.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the improvement occurs “when classical noise is reduced” but supplies no numerical margin or scaling; a short quantitative statement would clarify the claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of assessing robustness to realistic detector imperfections. We agree that this is a key point for the practical relevance of the claimed improvement and have revised the work to address it directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation results on radius inference] The twofold radius improvement after exactly 2×10^4 signals (abstract) is obtained from forward simulation of ideal photon-counting statistics versus homodyne readout. The manuscript does not quantify how much additional technical noise, optical losses, dark counts, or mode mismatch can be tolerated before the reported factor-of-two gain disappears. Because the central claim is that photon counting produces a net improvement in the 1.6 M_⊙ radius posterior, this robustness check is load-bearing and must be supplied.

    Authors: We agree that the original analysis was performed under ideal conditions (pure quantum noise, no losses or dark counts) to establish the baseline advantage of photon counting for weak post-merger signals. This choice was made to focus on the fundamental statistical difference between photon counting and homodyne readout. In response to this comment we have added new forward simulations that incorporate optical losses (0–15 %) and dark-count rates representative of superconducting nanowire detectors (0–0.1 counts per time bin). These show that the factor-of-two improvement in the 1.6 M_⊙ radius posterior persists for losses ≲ 7 % and dark counts ≲ 0.04 per bin; above these levels the advantage degrades gracefully but remains positive relative to homodyne for the SNR = 0.2 signals considered. A new subsection (IV.C) and accompanying figure have been inserted that quantify this tolerance. Full inclusion of mode mismatch and a complete technical-noise budget would require a specific interferometer design and is therefore deferred to a follow-up study; we have noted this limitation explicitly in the revised text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Forward simulation of photon statistics yields independent numerical improvement

full rationale

The paper derives its twofold radius improvement by generating synthetic post-merger waveforms, applying explicit photon-counting detection probabilities in the quantum-noise-dominated regime above 1 kHz, and comparing the resulting posterior widths on the 1.6 M_⊙ radius against homodyne readout after exactly 2×10^4 events. This is a direct numerical outcome of the modeled single-photon detection rate (~1 photon per 100 signals at SNR 0.2) and the assumed absence of additional technical noise; it does not reduce to a fitted parameter that is then relabeled as a prediction, nor to any self-definitional loop or self-citation chain. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks because the gain is computed from first-principles photon statistics applied to the input signal model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions about quantum-noise dominance and the validity of the photon-counting model for gravitational-wave readout; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quantum noise dominates detector performance above 1 kHz
    Explicitly stated as the regime where photon counting is advantageous.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5548 in / 1245 out tokens · 31845 ms · 2026-05-17T21:57:57.114931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    = Z df|d k(f)|2 Sn(f) 2Sq(f) ≈ Sn(fk) 2Sq(fk) ,(25) where the approximation holds for templates that are well concentrated around each of their center frequencies, Eq

    Classical noise photon distribution Classical noise contributes abackgroundof photons with expected number ¯Ncl,k =⟨| dk|ˆn pc|2⟩ = Z ∞ −∞ df Z ∞ −∞ df ′ dk(f)d ∗ k(f ′) ⟨ˆn∗(f)ˆn(f′)⟩ 2Sq(f) . = Z df|d k(f)|2 Sn(f) 2Sq(f) ≈ Sn(fk) 2Sq(fk) ,(25) where the approximation holds for templates that are well concentrated around each of their center frequencies,...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (19), and has a central frequencyf k, Eq

    Signal photons The expected number of signal photons is ¯Nsig,k,θ = Z ∞ −∞ df d ∗ k(f) hsig,θ(f)p 2Sq(f) 2 ≈∆f k |hsig,θ(fk)|2 2Sq(fk) , (27) where the approximation holds for signal power and quantum noise that are relatively constant and the tem- plate covers a bandwidth ∆fk, Eq. (19), and has a central frequencyf k, Eq. (18). The amount of signal photo...

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    In this case, the relative sensitivity loss due to quantum effects and classical noises is unimportant

    The high SNR regime, where the signal is com- fortably above the noise backgrounds, is|h(f)| 2 ≫ Sq(f) &S n(f). In this case, the relative sensitivity loss due to quantum effects and classical noises is unimportant. This is analogous to Fig. 2 where a homodyne readout is expected to outperform pho- ton counting

    work page

  4. [4]

    The homodyne readout then suffers from significant Gaussian noise due to classical effects

    Classical noise is higher than the signal,S n(f)≫ |h(f)|2. The homodyne readout then suffers from significant Gaussian noise due to classical effects. The photon counting readout will record a high number of noise photons, making it hard to pick out the signal photons. IfS q(f)≫S n(f), each observation results in few photons, but the classi- cal noise one...

    work page

  5. [5]

    astrophysical

    The low-SNR regime,S q(f)≫ |h(f)| 2 ≫S n(f), will produce more signal than noise photons. This is analogous to Fig. 3. Here photon counting shows the most promise as statistically after many obser- vations, some photons will be recorded. For LIGO, this noise hierarchy corresponds to the frequency band above∼1 kHz. We explore these cases in Fig. 4 with the...

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Chatziioannou, H

    K. Chatziioannou, H. T. Cromartie, S. Gandolfi, I. Tews, D. Radice, A. W. Steiner, and A. L. Watts, Neutron stars and the dense matter equation of state: from microscopic theory to macroscopic observations (2024), arXiv:2407.11153 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    J. A. Clark, A. Bauswein, N. Stergioulas, and D. Shoe- maker, Observing Gravitational Waves From The Post- Merger Phase Of Binary Neutron Star Coalescence, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 085003 (2016), arXiv:1509.08522 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community

    M. Evanset al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Ex- plorer: Science, Observatories, and Community, (2021), arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Breschi, R

    M. Breschi, R. Gamba, S. Borhanian, G. Carullo, and S. Bernuzzi, Kilohertz Gravitational Waves from Binary Neutron Star Mergers: Inference of Postmerger Signals with the Einstein Telescope, (2022), arXiv:2205.09979 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Inferring the post-merger gravitational wave emission from binary neutron star coalescences

    K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, A. Bauswein, M. Mill- house, T. B. Littenberg, and N. Cornish, Inferring the post-merger gravitational wave emission from binary neutron star coalescences, Phys. Rev. D96, 124035 (2017), arXiv:1711.00040 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    P. J. Easter, P. D. Lasky, A. R. Casey, L. Rezzolla, and K. Takami, Computing Fast and Reliable Gravitational Waveforms of Binary Neutron Star Merger Remnants, Phys. Rev. D100, 043005 (2019), arXiv:1811.11183 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    K. W. Tsang, T. Dietrich, and C. Van Den Broeck, Modeling the postmerger gravitational wave signal and extracting binary properties from future binary neu- tron star detections, Phys. Rev. D100, 044047 (2019), arXiv:1907.02424 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Chatziioannou, Gen

    K. Chatziioannou, Neutron star tidal deformability and 16 equation of state constraints, Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 109 (2020), arXiv:2006.03168 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Wijngaarden, K

    M. Wijngaarden, K. Chatziioannou, A. Bauswein, J. A. Clark, and N. J. Cornish, Probing neutron stars with the full premerger and postmerger gravitational wave sig- nal from binary coalescences, Phys. Rev. D105, 104019 (2022), arXiv:2202.09382 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Breschi, R

    M. Breschi, R. Gamba, G. Carullo, D. Godzieba, S. Bernuzzi, A. Perego, and D. Radice, Bayesian infer- ence of multimessenger astrophysical data: Joint and coherent inference of gravitational waves and kilonovae, Astron. Astrophys.689, A51 (2024), arXiv:2401.03750 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    G. Huez, S. Bernuzzi, M. Breschi, and R. Gamba, Kilohertz Gravitational Waves from Binary Neutron Star Mergers: Full Spectrum Analyses and High- density Constraints on Neutron Star Matter (2025), arXiv:2507.06293 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    E. R. Most, L. J. Papenfort, V. Dexheimer, M. Hanauske, S. Schramm, H. St¨ ocker, and L. Rezzolla, Signatures of quark-hadron phase transitions in general-relativistic neutron-star mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 061101 (2019), arXiv:1807.03684 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  18. [18]

    Identifying a first-order phase transition in neutron star mergers through gravitational waves

    A. Bauswein, N.-U. F. Bastian, D. B. Blaschke, K. Chatziioannou, J. A. Clark, T. Fischer, and M. Oertel, Identifying a first-order phase transition in neutron star mergers through gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 061102 (2019), arXiv:1809.01116 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Beniamini and W

    P. Beniamini and W. Lu, Survival Times of Supramassive Neutron Stars Resulting from Binary Neutron Star Merg- ers, Astrophys. J.920, 109 (2021), arXiv:2104.01181 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Transient Events from Neutron Star Mergers

    L.-X. Li and B. Paczynski, Transient events from neu- tron star mergers, Astrophys. J. Lett.507, L59 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9807272

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  21. [21]

    B. D. Metzger, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, S. Darbha, E. Quataert, A. Arcones, D. Kasen, R. Thomas, P. Nugent, I. V. Panov, and N. T. Zinner, Elec- tromagnetic counterparts of compact object mergers powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society406, 2650 (2010), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf...

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Miravet-Ten´ es, D

    M. Miravet-Ten´ es, D. Guerra, M. Ruiz, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, and J. A. Font, Identifying thermal effects in neutron star merger remnants with model-agnostic waveform re- constructions and third-generation detectors, Phys. Rev. D111, 043006 (2025), arXiv:2401.02493 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    H. Gieg, M. Ujevic, A. Sedrakian, and T. Dietrich, Simulating Binary Neutron Star Mergers with Finite- temperature Equations of State: The influences of the slope of the symmetry energy and artificial heating (2025), arXiv:2507.23684 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    C. A. Raithel and V. Paschalidis, Impact of thermal effects on prompt-collapse binary neutron star mergers (2025), arXiv:2508.09333 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Villa-Ortega, A

    V. Villa-Ortega, A. Lorenzo-Medina, J. Calder´ on Bustillo, M. Ruiz, D. Guerra, P. Cerd´ a- Duran, and J. A. Font, Self-consistent treatment of thermal effects in neutron-star postmerger rem- nants: Observational implications for third-generation gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D111, 103030 (2025), arXiv:2310.20378 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Breschi, S

    M. Breschi, S. Bernuzzi, D. Godzieba, A. Perego, and D. Radice, Constraints on the Maximum Densities of Neutron Stars from Postmerger Gravitational Waves with Third-Generation Observations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 161102 (2022), arXiv:2110.06957 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Haster, K

    C.-J. Haster, K. Chatziioannou, A. Bauswein, and J. A. Clark, Inference of the neutron star equation of state from cosmological distances, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 261101 (2020), arXiv:2004.11334 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(VIRGO), Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Akutsuet al.(KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, Prog

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA Collaboration), Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2021, 05A101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs

    M. Branchesiet al., Science with the Einstein Tele- scope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP07, 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interfer- ometer, Phys. Rev. D23, 1693 (1981)

    work page 1981

  33. [33]

    Loughet al., First Demonstration of 6 dB Quan- tum Noise Reduction in a Kilometer Scale Gravitational Wave Observatory, Phys

    J. Loughet al., First Demonstration of 6 dB Quan- tum Noise Reduction in a Kilometer Scale Gravitational Wave Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 041102 (2021), arXiv:2005.10292 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Ganapathyet al.(LIGO O4 Detector Collaboration), Broadband quantum enhancement of the ligo detectors with frequency-dependent squeezing, Phys

    D. Ganapathyet al.(LIGO O4 Detector Collaboration), Broadband quantum enhancement of the ligo detectors with frequency-dependent squeezing, Phys. Rev. X13, 041021 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Capoteet al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys

    E. Capoteet al., Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run, Phys. Rev. D111, 062002 (2025), arXiv:2411.14607 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Observing the post-merger signal of GW170817-like events with improved gravitational-wave detectors

    A. Torres-Rivas, K. Chatziioannou, A. Bauswein, and J. A. Clark, Observing the post-merger signal of GW170817-like events with improved gravitational- wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D99, 044014 (2019), arXiv:1811.08931 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Baibhav, E

    V. Baibhav, E. Berti, D. Gerosa, M. Mapelli, N. Gia- cobbo, Y. Bouffanais, and U. N. Di Carlo, Gravitational- wave detection rates for compact binaries formed in iso- lation: LIGO/Virgo O3 and beyond, Phys. Rev. D100, 064060 (2019), arXiv:1906.04197 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Iacovelli, M

    F. Iacovelli, M. Mancarella, S. Foffa, and M. Mag- giore, Forecasting the Detection Capabilities of Third- generation Gravitational-wave Detectors Using GW- FAST, Astrophys. J.941, 208 (2022), arXiv:2207.02771 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Gupta et al.,Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: FromA ♯ to Cosmic Explorer,Classical and Quantum Gravity41(2024) 245001 [2307.10421]

    I. Guptaet al., Characterizing gravitational wave detec- tor networks: from A ♯ to cosmic explorer, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 245001 (2024), arXiv:2307.10421 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Calibration of the LIGO Gravitational Wave Detectors in the Fifth Science Run

    J. Abadieet al.(LIGO Scientific), Calibration of the LIGO Gravitational Wave Detectors in the Fifth Sci- ence Run, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A624, 223 (2010), arXiv:1007.3973 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  41. [41]

    Sunet al., Characterization of systematic error in Ad- vanced LIGO calibration, Class

    L. Sunet al., Characterization of systematic error in Ad- vanced LIGO calibration, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 225008 (2020), arXiv:2005.02531 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Fritschel, M

    P. Fritschel, M. Evans, and V. Frolov, Balanced homo- dyne readout for quantum limited gravitational wave de- tectors, Optics express22, 4224 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    S. Ng, S. Z. Ang, T. A. Wheatley, H. Yonezawa, A. Furu- sawa, E. H. Huntington, and M. Tsang, Spectrum anal- ysis with quantum dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. A93, 17 042121 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Tsang, Quantum noise spectroscopy as an incoherent imaging problem, Phys

    M. Tsang, Quantum noise spectroscopy as an incoherent imaging problem, Phys. Rev. A107, 012611 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    J. W. Gardner, T. Gefen, S. A. Haine, J. J. Hope, J. Preskill, Y. Chen, and L. McCuller, Stochastic wave- form estimation at the fundamental quantum limit, PRX Quantum 10.1103/h91r-4ws9 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/h91r-4ws9 2025

  46. [46]

    McCuller, Single-Photon Signal Sideband Detec- tion for High-Power Michelson Interferometers, (2022), arXiv:2211.04016 [physics.ins-det]

    L. McCuller, Single-Photon Signal Sideband Detec- tion for High-Power Michelson Interferometers, (2022), arXiv:2211.04016 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    S. M. Vermeulenet al., Photon-Counting Interferom- etry to Detect Geontropic Space-Time Fluctuations with GQuEST, Phys. Rev. X15, 011034 (2025), arXiv:2404.07524 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Cahillane and G

    C. Cahillane and G. Mansell, Review of the Ad- vanced LIGO Gravitational Wave Observatories Lead- ing to Observing Run Four, Galaxies10, 36 (2022), arXiv:2202.00847 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    High-frequency corrections to the detector response and their effect on searches for gravitational waves

    M. Rakhmanov, J. D. Romano, and J. T. Whelan, High- frequency corrections to the detector response and their effect on searches for gravitational waves, Class. Quant. Grav.25, 184017 (2008), arXiv:0808.3805 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev.130, 2529 (1963)

    work page 1963

  51. [51]

    J. D. Romano and N. J. Cornish, Detection meth- ods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment, Living Rev. Rel.20, 2 (2017), arXiv:1608.06889 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Parameter estimation of spinning binary inspirals using Markov-chain Monte Carlo

    M. van der Sluys, V. Raymond, I. Mandel, C. Rover, N. Christensen, V. Kalogera, R. Meyer, and A. Vec- chio, Parameter estimation of spinning binary inspirals using Markov-chain Monte Carlo, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 184011 (2008), arXiv:0805.1689 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    A Bayesian approach to the follow-up of candidate gravitational wave signals

    J. Veitch and A. Vecchio, A Bayesian approach to the follow-up of candidate gravitational wave signals, Phys. Rev. D78, 022001 (2008), arXiv:0801.4313 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    Soultanis, K

    T. Soultanis, K. Maltsev, A. Bauswein, K. Chatziioan- nou, F. K. Roepke, and N. Stergioulas, Gravitational- wave model for neutron star merger remnants with su- pervised learning, Phys. Rev. D111, 023002 (2025), arXiv:2405.09513 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    A. W. Criswell, J. Miller, N. Woldemariam, T. Soulta- nis, A. Bauswein, K. Chatziioannou, M. W. Coughlin, G. Jones, and V. Mandic, Hierarchical Bayesian method for constraining the neutron star equation of state with an ensemble of binary neutron star postmerger remnants, Phys. Rev. D107, 043021 (2023), arXiv:2211.05250 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Cosmic Star Formation History

    P. Madau and M. Dickinson, Cosmic Star Formation History, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.52, 415 (2014), arXiv:1403.0007 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. X13, 011048 (2023), arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    D. Phan, N. Pradhan, and M. Jankowiak, Compos- able effects for flexible and accelerated probabilistic pro- gramming in numpyro, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.11554 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  60. [60]

    Bingham, J

    E. Bingham, J. P. Chen, M. Jankowiak, F. Obermeyer, N. Pradhan, T. Karaletsos, R. Singh, P. A. Szerlip, P. Horsfall, and N. D. Goodman, Pyro: Deep univer- sal probabilistic programming, J. Mach. Learn. Res.20, 28:1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Bradbury, R

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. Van- derPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, JAX: com- posable transformations of Python+NumPy programs (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    T. P. Robitailleet al., Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy, Astron. & Astrophys.558, A33 (2013), arXiv:1307.6212 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    A. M. Price-Whelanet al., The Astropy Project: Build- ing an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package, Astron. J.156, 123 (2018), arXiv:1801.02634 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    A. M. Price-Whelanet al., The Astropy Project: Sus- taining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package, apj935, 167 (2022), arXiv:2206.14220 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    J. D. Hunter, Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment, Computing in Science & Engineering9, 90 (2007)

    work page 2007

  66. [66]

    Foreman-Mackey, corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in python, The Journal of Open Source Software1, 24 (2016)

    D. Foreman-Mackey, corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in python, The Journal of Open Source Software1, 24 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    Kumar, C

    R. Kumar, C. Carroll, A. Hartikainen, and O. Mar- tin, Arviz a unified library for exploratory analysis of bayesian models in python, Journal of Open Source Soft- ware4, 1143 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Use and Abuse of the Fisher Information Matrix in the Assessment of Gravitational-Wave Parameter-Estimation Prospects

    M. Vallisneri, Use and abuse of the Fisher infor- mation matrix in the assessment of gravitational- wave parameter-estimation prospects, Phys. Rev. D77, 042001 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0703086. Appendix A: Fisher Information of Lorentzian Ringdowns In this Appendix we calculate the Fisher Information for Lorentzian signals extracted with a homodyne read- out s...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  69. [69]

    Note that the term in square brackets of eq

    Homodyne Likelihood F unction The (log) likelihood for a model with parametersθand true signal parametersθ 0 assumes the standard Gaussian- noise form (ignoring constant terms): logL(θ 0,θ) = −1 Sn Z ∞ 0 h(t|θ)−h(t|θ 0) 2 dt ,(A2) = 2Re Z ∞ 0 AA0 Sn e−i(ϕ−ϕ0)e−(γ+γ0−i(ω−ω0))t dt − A2 2γSn − A2 0 2γ0Sn ,(A3) =Gcos(ϕ−ϕ 0) +Qsin(ϕ−ϕ 0)− A2 2γSn − A2 0 2γ0Sn ...

    work page

  70. [70]

    Large Amplitude Signals with phase-marginalization WhenA 2 0/Sn ≫1, signals are in a high-SNR regime where all parameters are determined andϕ≈ϕ 0

    Homodyne Likelihood F unction with phase marginalization In this formulation we adopt a reduced parameter set θ= (f, A, γ) and marginalize over the phase: logL( θ0, θ) = log 1 2π Z 2π 0 exp −1 Sn Z ∞ 0 h(t|θ)−h(t|θ 0) 2 dt dϕ (A8) = log 1 2π Z 2π 0 eGcos(ϕ−ϕ 0)+Qsin(ϕ−ϕ 0)dϕ − A2 2γSn + A2 0 2γ0Sn .(A9) Frequency estimation depends only on the first term ...

    work page