Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

Chiral phonons can create a static orbital moment in a nonmagnetic metal without spin-orbit coupling.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 22:13 UTC pith:7BJGJKNR

load-bearing objection A clean multi-method derivation of a plausible but poorly-quantified orbital accumulation from chiral phonons; the numbers should not be trusted, but the mechanism may well survive. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.11272 v4 pith:7BJGJKNR submitted 2025-11-14 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Orbital Accumulation Induced by Chiral Phonons

Tetsuya Sato , Takeo Kato , Aurelien Manchon This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords chiral phononsorbital accumulationorbital angular momentumelectron-phonon couplingorbital quadrupole momentsecond-order responseorbitronicsBerry curvature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that chiral phonons—lattice vibrations whose atoms move in circular or helical paths—can leave behind a static, chirality-dependent orbital angular momentum in a conducting electron system, with no magnetism and no spin-orbit coupling required. Working on a square-lattice tight-binding model of p orbitals, the authors show that the orbital-dependent electron-phonon coupling acts on the electrons' orbital quadrupole moments; the linear response oscillates at the phonon frequency and time-averages to zero, but the second-order response rectifies into a uniform orbital accumulation. The central formula, ⟨Lx_0⟩^(2) ≈ Σ_k 4λℏω_q |C_q|^2 U_q^2 A_k, sets the sign by the phonon chirality λ and the magnitude by the occupied band structure. The authors estimate the conversion efficiency per energy flux to be comparable to circularly polarized light—about 10^-17 vs 10^-16 m²/W—and argue the effect grows sharply near orbital degeneracies in the band structure. If correct, this gives a phonon-based route to orbitronic control that does not rely on heavy elements.

Core claim

The central discovery is that a static orbital dipole moment can be induced purely by chiral lattice dynamics, at second order in the lattice displacement, in a system with neither magnetism nor spin-orbit coupling. In their two-center tight-binding model, the electron-phonon coupling between different p orbitals (px, py, pz) is fixed by the difference tσ - tπ of hopping integrals; after a long-wavelength expansion it takes the form H_ep = Σ_q C_q (u+_q Q-_-q + u-_q Q+_-q), where u± are chiral phonon coordinates and Q± = Q_xy ± i Q_zx are orbital quadrupole operators. The linear response of the orbital moment ⟨L_q⟩ oscillates with the phonon phase and vanishes on time average; the second-ord

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the orbital-dependent electron-phonon coupling, which the two-center approximation reduces to H_ep = Σ_q C_q [u+_q Q-_-q + u-_q Q+_-q] in the long-wavelength limit. Here u±_q = uy_q ± i uz_q encode the chiral circular motion of the lattice, Q±_q = Q_xy_q ± i Q_zx_q are orbital quadrupole operators built from the p-orbital angular momentum, and C_q ∝ -(tσ - tπ) q_x/N measures the difference between σ and π hopping. This coupling is what allows chirality to be transferred from the lattice to the orbital sector; the quadrupole operators act as the intermediate that converts the oscillating linear response into a static dipole moment at second order. The same result is

Load-bearing premise

The result leans on the stated-but-unproved assertion that the diagonal electron-phonon coupling s_αα makes no second-order contribution to orbital accumulation, together with the long-wavelength limits |k|,|q| ≪ 1/d and q_y,q_z ≪ q_x.

What would settle it

Compute ⟨Lx_0⟩^(2) with the diagonal coupling s_αα retained alongside the off-diagonal channel: any nonzero contribution of order |u|^2 would invalidate Eq. (20); experimentally, reversing the chirality of a surface-acoustic-wave drive in a nonmagnetic, spin-orbit-free film must exactly reverse the sign of the static orbital accumulation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A static orbital accumulation can be produced in a nonmagnetic, spin-orbit-free electron system, with its sign controlled simply by the handedness of the chiral phonons.
  • The energy-flux-normalized conversion efficiency is comparable to that of circularly polarized light (~10^-17 vs ~10^-16 m²/W), so phonon-driven orbitronics can work with ordinary materials rather than heavy elements.
  • The effect is enhanced near orbital degeneracies—for example, where the pz band touches the px and py bands—and along high-symmetry directions in the Brillouin zone, offering a band-structure design principle.
  • For thermal chiral phonons, the accumulation is proportional to the imbalance n+_q - n-_q and grows linearly with temperature above the Debye temperature, making a temperature gradient across a chiral material a practical drive.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same rectification should have a reciprocal counterpart: a static orbital polarization in the electrons should couple back to the chiral phonon modes, allowing electrical or optical detection of phonon chirality.
  • Since the effect scales with ℏω_q and with the Fermi-sea occupation, applying the formula to optical phonons or to band crossings such as Dirac/Weyl points could raise the accumulation well beyond the ~10^-7 Bohr magneton per site estimated here.
  • A direct test can be made in a nonmagnetic metal driven by a surface acoustic wave: time-resolved X-ray circular dichroism or orbital-sensitive probes should see a static orbital moment that reverses sign when the wave's handedness is reversed, with no accompanying spin signal.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a tight-binding model of p-orbitals on a square lattice with orbital-dependent electron-phonon coupling. For a chiral phonon mode propagating along x, the authors derive a static orbital accumulation ⟨L_x⟩ at second order in the lattice displacement. The central result is Eq. (20) with A_k defined in Eq. (21), obtained from a Berry-curvature argument and cross-checked by linear response, Keldysh, and equations-of-motion methods. The authors extend the result to nonequilibrium phonons in Eq. (24) and provide numerical estimates, including a claim that the phonon-to-orbital-moment conversion efficiency is comparable to that of circularly polarized light and that the effect is enhanced near orbital degeneracies.

Significance. The qualitative claim — that chiral phonons can produce a static orbital accumulation without spin-orbit coupling, with the sign set by phonon chirality — is conceptually interesting and, if correct, relevant to orbitronics. The derivation is self-contained: it starts from a microscopic tight-binding model and is cross-checked by four independent analytic methods, with no parameter fitted to the target effect. The prediction of enhancement at orbital-degeneracy hot spots is falsifiable. However, the quantitative estimates in Figs. 3-4 and the efficiency comparison to light rest on an uncontrolled extrapolation from a long-wavelength Hamiltonian to the full Brillouin zone. The qualitative mechanism may survive, but the numerical claims are not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (10), (20)-(21), (24); SM Eq. (42)] The simplified H_ep in Eq. (10) is derived only in the limit |k|,|q|≪1/d and q_y,q_z≪q_x. In particular, κ^x_{k,q}=sin(k_x d)-sin((k_x+q_x)d) is replaced by -q_x d, dropping a cos(k_x d) factor that is not small over most of the Brillouin zone. Equation (20) then sums A_k over the full BZ, and Eq. (24) integrates q up to the zone boundary. For the acoustic-phonon injection model, |C'_q|^2 (n_+ - n_-) ℏω_q grows with q (linearly in the high-temperature limit), so the q-sum is ultraviolet-dominated and the largest contributions come from the region where the long-wavelength approximation is invalid. The numerical estimates in Figs. 3-4, the μ_l ~ 0.4 μeV value, and the efficiency comparison to photons are therefore not controlled consequences of the derived formula. Please redo the numerical evaluation with the full κ(k,q), or alternatively restrict the calculation to q≪1/d with an explici
  2. [Main text after Eq. (21); Fig. 3 caption] The statement that the orbital accumulation originates from the entire Fermi sea is inconsistent with Eq. (21). The quantity A_k vanishes identically when f_x=f_y=f_z at the same k, so the nonzero contribution comes only from k points where there is an occupation imbalance between the px, py, and pz orbitals. These are regions where the Fermi level lies between the orbital-resolved bands, not 'all occupied energy eigenstates.' This also affects the comparison in footnote [44] between the present effect and Fermi-surface effects. Please revise the interpretation and make the statement consistent with Eq. (21).
  3. [Eq. (7); SM after Eq. (22)] The diagonal electron-phonon coupling s_αα is dropped with the assertion that it does not contribute to the orbital accumulation. The statement that it 'does not change the orbital degree of freedom' is not by itself a proof, because at second order in the displacement a diagram with one diagonal vertex and one off-diagonal vertex could in principle contribute. Please provide an explicit calculation, or at least a clear symmetry selection-rule argument, showing that such mixed second-order terms vanish. This is load-bearing because if they do not vanish, Eq. (20) is incomplete.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (10) vs. SM Eq. (42)] The relative sign of the u^-_q Q^+_{-q} term differs between Eq. (10) in the main text and the corresponding expression in SM Eq. (42). Since the sign of the chirality response is a central prediction, please reconcile this discrepancy.
  2. [Numerical Estimation] The same symbol T is used for both temperature and transmission coefficient in the nonequilibrium phonon distribution. This is confusing and should be changed.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The vertical axis is labeled in Bohr magnetons per site, but ⟨L_x⟩ as defined is an angular momentum. Please state explicitly how the conversion to μ_B is made (e.g., whether ℏ is set to unity).
  4. [Affiliations and general] There are minor typographical issues: 'Kas hiwa' in the affiliation, 'Bohr magnetron' should be 'Bohr magneton,' and 'SA W' in Fig. 2. Please proofread.
  5. [SM Keldysh formalism after Eq. (130)] The sentence noting that 'the zeroth order terms about ℏω_q are finite, but it vanishes when we assume |q|≪|k|' is cryptic. Please clarify which terms are being referred to and why the q≪k assumption removes them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: independent derivation of Eq. (20) from a microscopic tight-binding model, cross-checked by three methods; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eqs. (20)-(21), is derived from a microscopic nearest-neighbor tight-binding model (Eqs. (1)-(5)) and a derived off-diagonal electron-phonon coupling (Eqs. (6)-(7) and SM Sec. I). The second-order orbital accumulation is obtained via Berry curvature (Eqs. (19)-(21)), and the same expression is independently reproduced in SM Sec. III by linear response, in SM Sec. IV by Keldysh Green's functions, and in SM Sec. VI by equations of motion. No parameter is fitted to the target quantity: the numerical estimates use stated model parameters (tσ, tπ, ϵF, v, M, d) and a broadening Γ introduced only for convergence. The self-references to work by one of the authors (Refs. 20, 23) and to the Supplemental Material are background or derivation details, not load-bearing premises. The explicit statement that the result is equivalent to Eqs. (23) and (B5) of Ref. [4] 'except for the distribution function of the electrons' shows transparency and does not constitute renaming, since the orbital degree of freedom and its coupling are derived explicitly. The long-wavelength assumption |k|,|q| ≪ 1/d used to obtain Eq. (10) and the later evaluation over the full Brillouin zone are a quantitative-validity concern, not circularity: Eq. (20) is not an input but a computed response. No circular step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. The free parameters are standard tight-binding, Fermi-level, and phonon inputs, plus a regularization broadening Γ that matters for the degenerate-enhancement claim. The main non-standard axiom is the unproven dropping of diagonal electron-phonon coupling.

free parameters (5)
  • tσ (σ-bond hopping) = -1.9 eV
    Model parameter controlling band widths and electron-phonon coupling strength; chosen by hand, not fit to data.
  • tπ (π-bond hopping) = -2.0 eV (varied ±0.1)
    Model parameter; the coupling constant in Hep is proportional to (tσ−tπ), so its value sets the effect magnitude.
  • Fermi energy μ = -1.5 eV (varied)
    Sets the electron density and controls the Fermi functions f_x,f_y,f_z; the effect vanishes when all are equal.
  • Broadening Γ = 0.01 eV
    Introduced 'for the sake of numerical convergence' (main text, Numerical Estimation); the degeneracy-enhancement peak in Fig. 4 depends on this choice.
  • Phonon/numerical inputs = v=5000 m/s, M=4e-26 kg, d=5 Å, T=0.1, δv'=v'/10
    Inputs for the magnitude estimate; not directly part of the central derivation but required for the claimed numbers.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Two-center hopping approximation with rigid-atom electron-phonon coupling, reducing s_αβ to (tσ−tπ)/d
    Standard tight-binding result used in the Supplemental Material §I to derive Hep; the central coupling relies on it.
  • ad hoc to paper Diagonal electron-phonon coupling s_αα does not contribute to orbital accumulation at second order
    Asserted in the main text after Eq. (7) with a one-line justification; no general proof is provided. If false, Eq. (20) is incomplete.
  • domain assumption Long-wavelength limit |k|,|q|≪1/d and q_y,q_z≪q_x
    Used to reduce Hep to the quadrupole-coupling form in Eq. (10) and to simplify the Berry curvature/Keldysh sums.
  • domain assumption Phonon energy ℏω_q much smaller than electronic band splittings
    Invoked in Eq. (14) and footnote [42] to drop the density-matrix correction; necessary for the Berry-phase result.
  • ad hoc to paper Nonequilibrium phonon distribution nλ_q = n_eq + Θ(q_x)T/(e^{ℏΩλ_q/kBT}−1)
    A simplified model for chiral phonon injection from an adjacent chiral material, used only for numerical estimates.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 26270 in / 14408 out tokens · 120740 ms · 2026-08-03T22:13:31.072826+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We theoretically investigate orbital accumulation driven by chiral phonons via orbital-dependent electron-lattice coupling. We derive a formula for the orbital accumulation induced by classical lattice dynamics or nonequilibrium phonons, emphasizing the rectified second-order response of the orbital moment to lattice displacement. We show that chiral phonons primarily couple to orbital quadrupole moments and that static orbital dipole accumulation can be generated at second order in the lattice displacement. Our study provides a useful method for generating orbital accumulation without using spin-orbit interactions and suggests a strategy to boost its magnitude by harnessing band structure hot spots associated with orbital degeneracy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.11272 by Aurelien Manchon, Takeo Kato, Tetsuya Sato.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) A square lattice with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) The coherent chiral displacement mode can be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The orbital accumulation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Frequency-dependent electron-phonon coupling and vibrational responses in tight-binding and continuous Dirac models with nuclear velocity correction

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Adding nuclear-velocity phases (electron-translation factors) to atomic orbitals makes tight-binding and Dirac models satisfy the all-electron vibrational sum rules.

  2. Microscopic Theory of Chiral-Phonon-Induced Orbital Selectivity in Helical Crystals

    cond-mat.other 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Chiral phonons in L3_1 helical crystals generate rotational electron-phonon interactions that drive orbital angular momentum transfer m_ℓ to m_ℓ - m_s, with the response suppressed at Γ and zone boundary but enhanced ...

  3. Magnetism and Topology from Circularly Polarized Phonon Floquet Engineering

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Circularly polarized phonons on honeycomb lattice produce Haldane-type mass term via effective NNN hopping, driving transition to Chern insulator with emergent magnetizations.

  4. Effective electron coupling to phonon mechanical angular momentum in helical systems

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Phonon mechanical angular momentum converts to electronic degrees of freedom via a derived second-order Hamiltonian in helical systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Angular Momentum of Phonons and the Einstein–de Haas Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 085503 (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    While the orbital accu- mulation induced by the nonequilibrium distribution of phonons is rigorously calculated in the framework of the Keldysh formalism [ 39], the result is easily obtained for |q| ≪ | k| by replacing the lattice displacement in Eq. ( 19) as λωqU 2 q = iλ 2 ( ˙uλ qu ¯λ −q +u ¯λ −q ˙uλ q ) → ℏ(n+ q −n− −q) MN , (23) and by summing it up w...

  3. [3]

    To demon- strate the effect of orbital degeneracy, we show the orbital accumulation when shifting the energy of the pz orbital with δϵz in Fig

    and (21), the orbital accumu- lation is sensitive to the orbital degeneracy. To demon- strate the effect of orbital degeneracy, we show the orbital accumulation when shifting the energy of the pz orbital with δϵz in Fig

  4. [4]

    This result indicates that orbital degeneracies play a key role in generating large orbital accumulation

    The orbital accumulation is sharply enhanced around δϵz ∼ 0.2 eV, where the Fermi surface of thepz orbital touches those of thepx andpy orbitals, as indicated by the insets. This result indicates that orbital degeneracies play a key role in generating large orbital accumulation. Such degeneracies naturally arise along high-symmetry directions in the Brill...

    2030

  5. [5]

    Zhang, Z

    S. Zhang, Z. Huang, M. Du, T. Ying, L. Du, and T. Zhang, Comprehensive Study of Phonon Chirality under Symmetry Constraints (2025), arXiv:2503.22794 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Chiral phonons at high-symmetry points in monolayer hexagonal lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 115502 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    D. M. Juraschek, R. M. Geilhufe, H. Zhu, M. Basini, P. Baum, A. Baydin, S. Chaudhary, M. Fechner, B. Fle- bus, G. Grissonnanche, A. I. Kirilyuk, M. Lemeshko, S. F. Maehrlein, M. Mignolet, S. Murakami, Q. Niu, U. Nowak, C. P. Romao, H. Rostami, T. Satoh, N. A. Spaldin, H. Ueda, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons, Nat. Phys. 21, 1532 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Zhang, Y

    T. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. Miao, and S. Murakami, New Ad- vances in Phonons: From Band Topology to Quasipar- ticle Chirality (2025), arXiv:2505.06179 [cond-mat.mes- hall]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Obser- vation of chiral phonons, Science 359, 579 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Boˇ zovic, Possible band-structure shapes of quasi-one - dimensional solids, Phys

    I. Boˇ zovic, Possible band-structure shapes of quasi-one - dimensional solids, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6586 (1984)

    1984

  11. [11]

    S. V. Vonsovskii and M. S. Svirskii, Chiral phonons and pseudoangular momentum in nonsymmorphic systems, Sov. Phys. Solid State 3, 1568 (1962)

    1962

  12. [12]

    A. G. McLellan, Angular momentum states for phonons and a rotationally invariant development of lattice dy- namics, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 21, 1177 (1988)

    1988

  13. [13]

    Sasaki, Y

    R. Sasaki, Y. Nii, and Y. Onose, Magnetization control by angular momentum transfer from surface acoustic wave to ferromagnetic spin moments, Nat. Commun. 12, 2599 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, K. Kobayashi, Y. Kousaka, Y. To- gawa, H. Kusunose, J.-i. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Chiral phonons: circularly polarized raman spectroscopy and ab initio calculations in a chiral crystal tellurium, Chirality 35, 338 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Hamada and S

    M. Hamada and S. Murakami, Conversion between elec- tron spin and microscopic atomic rotation, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023275 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    R¨ uckriegel, S

    A. R¨ uckriegel, S. Streib, G. E. W. Bauer, and R. A. Duine, Angular momentum conservation and phonon spin in magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104402 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    D. Yao, M. Matsuo, and T. Yokoyama, Electric field- induced nonreciprocal spin current due to chiral phonons in chiral-structure superconductors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, 162603 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Yao and S

    D. Yao and S. Murakami, Chiral-phonon-induced current in helical crystals, Phys. Rev. B 105, 184412 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Fransson, Chiral phonon induced spin polarization, Phys

    J. Fransson, Chiral phonon induced spin polarization, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022039 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Numerical Estimation.— Next, we estimate the mag- nitude of ⟨Lx 0⟩ using ωq = v|q|, v = 5000 m/s, M = 4 × 10−26 kg, and d = 5 ˚ A

    and ( 21). Numerical Estimation.— Next, we estimate the mag- nitude of ⟨Lx 0⟩ using ωq = v|q|, v = 5000 m/s, M = 4 × 10−26 kg, and d = 5 ˚ A. The Debye temperature is approximated as TD = 240 K. We consider the injection of chiral phonons from an adjacent chiral material (see Fig. 2(b)) and assume the nonequilibrium phonon distri- bution as nλ q = neq,q +...

  21. [21]

    K. Kim, E. Vetter, L. Yan, C. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Sun, Y. Yang, A. H. Comstock, X. Li, J. Zhou, L. Zhang, 6 W. You, D. Sun, and J. Liu, Chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect, Nat. Mater. 22, 322 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Yao and S

    D. Yao and S. Murakami, Conversion of Chiral Phonons into Magnons in Ferromagnets and Antiferromagnets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 034708 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    K. Ohe, H. Shishido, M. Kato, S. Utsumi, H. Matsuura, and Y. Togawa, Chirality-induced selectivity of phonon angular momenta in chiral quartz crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056302 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Funato, M

    T. Funato, M. Matsuo, and T. Kato, Chirality-Induced Phonon-Spin Conversion at an Interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236201 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    X. Li, J. Zhong, J. Cheng, H. Chen, H. Wang, J. Liu, D. Sun, L. Zhang, and J. Zhou, Chiral phonon activated spin Seebeck effect in chiral materials, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 237511 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Shabala and R

    N. Shabala and R. M. Geilhufe, Phonon Inverse Faraday Effect from Electron-Phonon Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 266702 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Nishimura, T

    N. Nishimura, T. Funato, M. Matsuo, and T. Kato, The- ory of spin Seebeck effect activated by acoustic chiral phonons, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 630, 173386 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    X. Qin, C. Yang, D. Sun, J. Liu, and V. Blum, Chiral Phonon-Induced Spin Transport via Microscopic Barnett Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 076703 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Yokoyama, Phonon Edelstein effect in chiral metals, Phys

    T. Yokoyama, Phonon Edelstein effect in chiral metals, Phys. Rev. B 112, L020406 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    H. Ueda, M. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, S. Agrestini, C. P. Ro- mao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K. J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in quartz probed by X-rays, Nature 618, 946 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Oishi, Y

    E. Oishi, Y. Fujii, and A. Koreeda, Selective observation of enantiomeric chiral phonons in α-quartz, Phys. Rev. B 109, 104306 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, J. ichiro Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons in α-HgS, Nat. Phys. 19, 35 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Zhang, N

    H. Zhang, N. Peshcherenko, F. Yang, T. Z. Ward, P. Raghuvanshi, L. Lindsay, C. Felser, Y. Zhang, J. Q. Yan, and H. Miao, Measurement of phonon angular mo- mentum, Nat. Phys. 21, 1387 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    S. R. Tauchert, M. Volkov, D. Ehberger, D. Kazenwadel, M. Evers, H. Lange, A. Donges, A. Book, W. Kreuz- paintner, U. Nowak, and P. Baum, Polarized phonons carry angular momentum in ultrafast demagnetization, Nature 602, 73 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Yao and S

    D. Yao and S. Murakami, Theory of spin magnetiza- tion driven by chiral phonons, Phys. Rev. B 111, 134414 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    D. Go, D. Jo, C. Kim, and H. W. Lee, Intrinsic Spin and Orbital Hall Effects from Orbital Texture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    D. Lee, D. Go, H. J. Park, W. Jeong, H. W. Ko, D. Yun, D. Jo, S. Lee, G. Go, J. H. Oh, K. J. Kim, B. G. Park, B. C. Min, H. C. Koo, H. W. Lee, O. J. Lee, and K. J. Lee, Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers, Nat. Commun. 12, 6710 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    W. Gao, L. Liao, H. Isshiki, N. Budai, J. Kim, H. W. Lee, K. J. Lee, D. Go, Y. Mokrousov, S. Miwa, and Y. Otani, Nonlocal electrical detection of reciprocal orbital edel- stein effect, Nat. Commun. 16, 6380 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Taniguchi, S

    M. Taniguchi, S. Haku, H.-W. Lee, and K. Ando, Acous- tic generation of orbital currents, Nat. Commun. 16, 8038 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Han, H.-W

    S. Han, H.-W. Ko, J. H. Oh, H.-W. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and K.-W. Kim, Orbital Pumping Incorporating Both Orbital Angular Momentum and Position, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 036305 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    T. K. Mitra, Electron-phonon interaction in the modi- fied tight-binding approximation, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 2, 52 (1969)

    1969

  42. [42]

    Bariˇ si´ c, Rigid-atom electron-phonon coupling in th e tight-binding approximation.i, Phys

    S. Bariˇ si´ c, Rigid-atom electron-phonon coupling in th e tight-binding approximation.i, Phys. Rev. B 5, 932 (1972)

    1972

  43. [43]

    See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.***.****** for detailed information on the tight-binding model, the Berry curvature, linear response theory, the Keldysh formalism, and equation of motion for orbital angular and quadrapole moments

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett

  44. [44]

    Using the quadrupole operators for the orbital angular momentum of p-orbitals, which are defined by Qx2−y2 = L2 x −L2 y,Q3z2−r2 = (3 ˆL2 z − 2)/ √ 3,Qxy =LxLy +LyLx, Qyz =LyLz +LzLy, and Qzx =LzLx +LxLz, we obtain Q± q =Qxy q ±iQzx q

  45. [45]

    Y. Su, A. V. Balatsky, and S.-Z. Lin, Quantum Nonlinear Acoustic Hall Effect and Inverse Acoustic Faraday Effect in Dirac Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 026304 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Assuming that the phonon energy ℏωq is much smaller than the energy splitting ϵkβ −ϵkα, we can drop this correction

    The density operator also includes a correction due to the lattice displacement as ρ(t) = ρeq(t) + δρ(t), where ⟨ψβ|δρ(t) |ψα⟩ = ∑ q ˙uq · ⟨ψβ|iℏ∂uqρ(t) |ψα⟩/(ϵβ −ϵα), which is estimated as ℏωq⟨ρeq⟩/(ϵβ k −ϵα k). Assuming that the phonon energy ℏωq is much smaller than the energy splitting ϵkβ −ϵkα, we can drop this correction

  47. [47]

    ⟨Lx q⟩ is not prohibited from the symmetry but vanishes because we neglected the mixing interaction between py and pz orbitals due to the assumption of qy ≪qx

  48. [48]

    In principle, the second-order terms of ⟨L± q ⟩, which cor- respond to electron-hole excitation due to phonons, can exist. This effect, which is effective only near the Fermi surface, is expected to be much smaller than the Fermi sea effect discussed in the main text, assuming that the Fermi energy is much larger than the phonon energy

  49. [49]

    One can check that these equations reproduce the results based on the Berry curvature

  50. [50]

    With the broadening factor, ( ϵx,y k −ϵz k)−2 is replaced with[ (ϵx,y k −ϵz k)2 + Γ2]−1

  51. [51]

    Adamantopoulos, D

    T. Adamantopoulos, D. Go, P. M. Oppeneer, and Y. Mokrousov, Light-induced orbital and spin magnetism in 3d, 4d, and 5d transition metals, npj Spintronics 3, 27 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Waldecker, R

    L. Waldecker, R. Bertoni, R. Ernstorfer, and J. Vor- berger, Electron-Phonon Coupling and Energy Flow in a Simple Metal beyond the Two-Temperature Approxi- mation, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021003 (2016)

    2016

  53. [53]

    D. Go, D. Jo, K. W. Kim, S. Lee, M. G. Kang, B. G. Park, S. Bl¨ ugel, H. W. Lee, and Y. Mokrousov, Long-Range Or- bital Torque by Momentum-Space Hotspots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246701 (2023)

    2023

  54. [54]

    D. Yao, D. Go, Y. Mokrousov, and S. Murakami, Dy- namical Orbital Angular Momentum Induced by Chiral Phonons (2025), arXiv:2511.09271 [cond-mat.mes-hall] . Supplementary Information for Orbital Accumulation Induced by Chiral Phonons Tetsuya Sato, 1 Takeo Kato, 1 and Aurelien Manchon 2 1Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, Kas hiwa, 277-...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    (36) Other components can be calculated in a similar way

    and ( 28), the coupling strength sxy(k, q) is given as sxy(k, q) = 2i(tσ −tπ) d [κx k,qey +κy k,qex], (35) κµ k,q = sin(kµ +qµ)d − sinkµd, (µ =x,y,z ). (36) Other components can be calculated in a similar way. As a result, the or bital-dependent electron-phonon coupling is derived as Hep = ∑ k,q 2i(tσ −tπ) dN { κy k,quz qc† k+q,yck,z +κx k,quz qc† k+q,zck...

  56. [59]

    T. K. Mitra, Electron-phonon interaction in the modified tig ht-binding approximation, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 2, 52 (1969)

    1969

  57. [60]

    Bariˇ si´ c, Rigid-atom electron-phonon coupling in thetight-binding approximation.i, Phys

    S. Bariˇ si´ c, Rigid-atom electron-phonon coupling in thetight-binding approximation.i, Phys. Rev. B 5, 932 (1972)

    1972

  58. [61]

    Han, H.-W

    S. Han, H.-W. Ko, J. H. Oh, H.-W. Lee, K.-J. Lee, and K.-W. K im, Orbital Pumping Incorporating Both Orbital Angular Momentum and Position, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 036305 (2025)

    2025

  59. [62]

    Yao and S

    D. Yao and S. Murakami, Theory of spin magnetization driven by chiral phonons, Phys. Rev. B 111, 134414 (2025)

    2025

  60. [130]

    for details). The geometrical part is calculated as ⟨Lx 0⟩(2) ≃ ∑ k,k′ ℏωquλ qu ¯λ −q|Cq|2 {[ ∑ α,β f x k ⟨kx|Qλ −q |k′β⟩ ⟨k′β|Lx 0 |k′α⟩ ϵx k −ϵβ k ⟨k′α|Q¯λ q |kx⟩ (ϵα k −ϵx k)(ϵx k −ϵα k) +f y k ⟨ky|Lx 0 |kz⟩ ⟨kz|Qλ −q |k′x⟩ ϵx k −ϵz k ⟨k′x|Q¯λ q |ky⟩ (ϵx k −ϵy k)(ϵy k −ϵx k) +f y k ⟨ky|Lx 0 |kz⟩ ⟨kz|Qλ −q |k′x⟩ ϵz k −ϵx k ⟨k′x|Q¯λ q |ky⟩ (ϵz k −ϵy k)(ϵ...

  61. [137]

    (20) and (21) in the main text

    and ( 139), we reproduce the result based on the Berry phase given in Eqs. (20) and (21) in the main text

  62. [141]

    becomes time-independent because of ⟨Q− −q,k⟩ ∝ u¯λ −q, and we obtain a closed form for the equation of motion of the orbital angular momentum as ℏ2d2⟨Lx Q=0,k⟩ dt2 ≈ −(ϵz k −ϵy k)2⟨Lx Q=0,k⟩ + (ϵz k −ϵy k) ∑ q′ Cq′ { u+ q′ ⟨L+ −q′,k⟩ +u− q′ ⟨L− −q′,k⟩ } . (143) Finally, we obtain the time-independent orbital accumulation as ⟨Lx Q=0,k⟩ ≈ 1 ϵz k −ϵy k ∑ q′...