pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2511.15783 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · hep-th· quant-ph

Automorphism in Gauge Theories: Higher Symmetries and Transversal Non-Clifford Logical Gates

Po-Shen Hsin , Ryohei Kobayashi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 20:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el hep-thquant-ph
keywords gauge theoriesautomorphismshigher symmetriesnon-invertible symmetriestransversal logical gatesClifford hierarchyZ_N qudit modelstopological quantum codes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Automorphisms of gauge groups with nontrivial topological actions extend to higher or non-invertible symmetries and enable non-Clifford transversal gates in Z_N qudit codes for N at least 3.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines symmetries induced by automorphisms of the gauge group in gauge theories that include nontrivial topological actions across different spacetime dimensions. It shows these automorphism symmetries can extend into higher group symmetries or become non-invertible. The authors illustrate the effect in both continuum field theory models and lattice realizations. They apply the construction to topological quantum codes and demonstrate that 2+1d Z_N qudit Clifford stabilizer models support transversal logical gates at the fourth level of the Z_N qudit Clifford hierarchy when N is at least 3. This result extends the generalized Bravyi-König bound given in a companion paper. A reader would care because the symmetry extension supplies a systematic route from abstract gauge theory structures to concrete, fault-tolerant operations on qudits.

Core claim

We discover that automorphism symmetry of the gauge group can be extended, become a higher group symmetry, and/or become a non-invertible symmetry when the gauge theories have nontrivial topological actions in different spacetime dimensions. We use automorphism symmetry to construct new transversal non-Clifford logical gates in topological quantum codes and show that 2+1d Z_N qudit Clifford stabilizer models can implement non-Clifford transversal logical gate in the 4th level Z_N qudit Clifford hierarchy for N greater than or equal to 3, extending the generalized Bravyi-König bound proposed in the companion paper.

What carries the argument

Automorphism symmetry of the gauge group, which extends to higher or non-invertible symmetries in the presence of nontrivial topological actions.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that automorphism symmetries of the gauge group extend to higher or non-invertible symmetries when nontrivial topological actions are present, without additional constraints that would prevent the extension in the lattice models discussed.

What would settle it

A concrete 2+1d Z_N lattice model with nontrivial topological action in which the automorphism symmetry fails to produce a transversal gate at the fourth level of the Clifford hierarchy would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.15783 by Po-Shen Hsin, Ryohei Kobayashi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Automorphism symmetry ρ : G → G in twisted gauge theory with topological action ω needs to decorate with gauged SPT symmetry e i R α for automorphism ρ that preserves the cohomology class [ω] but in general not the cocycle, ρ ∗ω = ω + dα. The time direction goes from the right to the left, and the interface is oriented. The cocycles ω, ρ∗ω can differ by an exact cocycle: ρ ∗ω = ω + dαρ , (2) where αρ is a … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Automorphism symmetry can be extended by the gauged SPT symmetry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Sandwich construction for automorphism symmetry in twisted gauge theory with gauge group [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Junction of automorphism symmetry (black) in untwisted gauge theory with gauged SPT symmetry (red) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fusing automorphism symmetry defects in the presence of a gauged SPT symmetry defect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The intersection between the automorphism symmetry defect and the magnetic defect shifting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gauge theories are important descriptions for many physical phenomena and systems in quantum computation. Automorphism of gauge group naturally gives global symmetries of gauge theories. In this work we study such symmetries in gauge theories induced by automorphisms of the gauge group, when the gauge theories have nontrivial topological actions in different spacetime dimensions. We discover the automorphism symmetry can be extended, become a higher group symmetry, and/or become a non-invertible symmetry. We illustrate the discussion with various models in field theory and on the lattice. In particular, we use automorphism symmetry to construct new transversal non-Clifford logical gates in topological quantum codes. In particular, we show that 2+1d $\mathbb{Z}_N$ qudit Clifford stabilizer models can implement non-Clifford transversal logical gate in the 4th level $\mathbb{Z}_N$ qudit Clifford hierarchy for $N\geq 3$, extending the generalized Bravyi-K\"onig bound proposed in the companion paper [arXiv:2511.02900] for qubits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that automorphisms of gauge groups in theories with nontrivial topological actions can extend to higher-group or non-invertible symmetries. It illustrates this with various field theory and lattice models, and applies it to construct transversal non-Clifford logical gates in 2+1d Z_N qudit stabilizer codes that reside in the 4th level of the Clifford hierarchy for N ≥ 3, extending a generalized Bravyi-König bound from the companion paper arXiv:2511.02900.

Significance. If substantiated, the results would offer insights into the emergence of higher and non-invertible symmetries from gauge automorphisms and provide new constructions for logical gates in topological quantum error correction. The potential to realize non-Clifford operations transversally in qudit codes is significant for quantum computing, though the current presentation relies on extensions from prior work without full derivations here.

major comments (2)
  1. Discussion of 2+1d Z_N models: The claim that 2+1d Z_N qudit Clifford stabilizer models implement a non-Clifford transversal logical gate in the 4th level of the Z_N qudit Clifford hierarchy for N≥3 rests on an unshown extension of the automorphism symmetry in the presence of nontrivial topological actions; no explicit lattice Hamiltonian or commutation relation with the topological term is provided to verify that the induced operator remains transversal and at the 4th level rather than reducing to the 3rd.
  2. Abstract and introduction: The central results on higher symmetries and the logical gate construction are stated without derivations, explicit checks, or lattice Hamiltonians, making it challenging to assess the support for the extension of automorphism symmetries to higher symmetries on the lattice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help us improve the clarity of our presentation on gauge automorphisms, higher symmetries, and their application to logical gates. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned for the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Discussion of 2+1d Z_N models: The claim that 2+1d Z_N qudit Clifford stabilizer models implement a non-Clifford transversal logical gate in the 4th level of the Z_N qudit Clifford hierarchy for N≥3 rests on an unshown extension of the automorphism symmetry in the presence of nontrivial topological actions; no explicit lattice Hamiltonian or commutation relation with the topological term is provided to verify that the induced operator remains transversal and at the 4th level rather than reducing to the 3rd.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The extension of automorphism symmetries in the presence of nontrivial topological actions is derived in the continuum field theory discussion and then illustrated on the lattice for several models. For the specific 2+1d Z_N qudit case, the construction relies on the generalized Bravyi-König bound established in the companion paper, combined with the automorphism action shown to preserve the stabilizer structure. To make the verification fully self-contained, we will add an explicit lattice Hamiltonian for the Z_N model together with the commutation relations between the automorphism-induced operator and the topological term in the revised manuscript. This will confirm that the operator remains transversal and resides at the fourth level of the Clifford hierarchy for N ≥ 3. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract and introduction: The central results on higher symmetries and the logical gate construction are stated without derivations, explicit checks, or lattice Hamiltonians, making it challenging to assess the support for the extension of automorphism symmetries to higher symmetries on the lattice.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and introduction present the main results at a high level. The manuscript does contain derivations of the higher-group and non-invertible symmetries in the field-theory sections and explicit lattice realizations in later sections. To improve accessibility, we will expand the introduction with brief outlines of the key steps showing how gauge automorphisms extend to higher or non-invertible symmetries, and we will add cross-references to the specific lattice Hamiltonians and checks already present in the text. These changes will allow readers to assess the lattice support more readily. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central claim extends generalized Bravyi-König bound from same-authors companion paper

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "we show that 2+1d Z_N qudit Clifford stabilizer models can implement non-Clifford transversal logical gate in the 4th level Z_N qudit Clifford hierarchy for N≥3, extending the generalized Bravyi-König bound proposed in the companion paper [arXiv:2511.02900] for qubits."

    The 4th-level transversal-gate result is positioned as an extension of the bound first proposed in the authors' own companion work. This makes the classification of the constructed operator as strictly 4th-level (rather than 3rd-level) dependent on the prior self-cited proposal without an independent derivation of the bound inside the present manuscript.

full rationale

The manuscript presents new lattice constructions for transversal gates in Z_N qudit models and discusses extensions of automorphism symmetries to higher or non-invertible symmetries in the presence of topological actions. These elements supply independent content. However, the headline result is explicitly framed as extending a bound proposed in the authors' companion paper arXiv:2511.02900, creating a moderate self-citation dependency for the 4th-level classification. No derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition within this paper alone; the self-citation is load-bearing but not the sole justification for the lattice claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions from gauge theory and topological quantum codes; no free parameters or new invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Automorphisms of the gauge group induce global symmetries in gauge theories with topological actions
    Invoked as the starting point for extending symmetries to higher or non-invertible forms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5484 in / 1295 out tokens · 27422 ms · 2026-05-17T20:13:39.356306+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Clifford Hierarchy Stabilizer Codes: Transversal Non-Clifford Gates and Magic,

    R. Kobayashi, G. Zhu, and P.-S. Hsin, “Clifford Hierarchy Stabilizer Codes: Transversal Non-Clifford Gates and Magic,”arXiv:2511.02900 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, “Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group,”Phys. Rev. B87no. 15, (2013) 155114,arXiv:1106.4772 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, “Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,”Commun. Math. Phys. 129(1990) 393

    work page 1990

  4. [4]

    Condensations in higher categories,

    D. Gaiotto and T. Johnson-Freyd, “Condensations in higher categories,” 5, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Non-Invertible Symmetries as Condensation Defects in Finite-Group Gauge Theories,

    C. Cordova, D. B. Costa, and P.-S. Hsin, “Non-Invertible Symmetries as Condensation Defects in Finite-Group Gauge Theories,”arXiv:2412.16681 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    Higher-group symmetry in finite gauge theory and stabilizer codes,

    M. Barkeshli, Y.-A. Chen, P.-S. Hsin, and R. Kobayashi, “Higher-group symmetry in finite gauge theory and stabilizer codes,”SciPost Phys.16(2024) 089,arXiv:2211.11764 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons,

    A. Y. Kitaev, “Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons,”AIP Conf.Proc.303(2003) 2–30

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Topological color code and symmetry-protected topological phases,

    B. Yoshida, “Topological color code and symmetry-protected topological phases,”Phys. Rev. B91(Jun, 2015) 245131.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.245131

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.245131 2015

  9. [9]

    Topological phases with generalized global symmetries,

    B. Yoshida, “Topological phases with generalized global symmetries,”Phys. Rev. B93(Apr, 2016) 155131. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.155131

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.155131 2016

  10. [10]

    Gapped boundaries, group cohomology and fault-tolerant logical gates,

    B. Yoshida, “Gapped boundaries, group cohomology and fault-tolerant logical gates,”Annals of Physics377 (2017) 387–413.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491616302858

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Higher-group symmetry of (3+1)D fermionicZ 2 gauge theory: Logical CCZ, CS, and T gates from higher symmetry,

    M. Barkeshli, P.-S. Hsin, and R. Kobayashi, “Higher-group symmetry of (3+1)D fermionicZ 2 gauge theory: Logical CCZ, CS, and T gates from higher symmetry,”SciPost Phys.16no. 5, (2024) 122,arXiv:2311.05674 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Cross-cap defects and fault-tolerant logical gates in the surface code and the honeycomb floquet code,

    R. Kobayashi and G. Zhu, “Cross-cap defects and fault-tolerant logical gates in the surface code and the honeycomb floquet code,”PRX Quantum5no. 2, (June, 2024) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020360

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020360 2024

  13. [13]

    Non-Abelian Self-Correcting Quantum Memory and Single-shot Non-Clifford Gate beyond then 1/3 Distance Barrier,

    P.-S. Hsin, R. Kobayashi, and G. Zhu, “Non-Abelian Self-Correcting Quantum Memory and Single-shot Non-Clifford Gate beyond then 1/3 Distance Barrier,”arXiv e-prints(May, 2024) arXiv:2405.11719, arXiv:2405.11719 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Codimension-2 defects and higher symmetries in (3+ 1) d topological phases,

    M. Barkeshli, Y.-A. Chen, S.-J. Huang, R. Kobayashi, N. Tantivasadakarn, and G. Zhu, “Codimension-2 defects and higher symmetries in (3+ 1) d topological phases,”SciPost Physics14no. 4, (2023) 065

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Classifying Logical Gates in Quantum Codes via Cohomology Operations and Symmetry,

    P.-S. Hsin, R. Kobayashi, and G. Zhu, “Classifying Logical Gates in Quantum Codes via Cohomology Operations and Symmetry,”arXiv:2411.15848 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv

  16. [16]

    Fermionic defects of topological phases and logical gates,

    R. Kobayashi, “Fermionic defects of topological phases and logical gates,”SciPost Physics15no. 1, (July,

    work page

  17. [17]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.1.028

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.15.1.028

  18. [18]

    A topological theory for qldpc: non-clifford gates and magic state fountain on homological product codes with constant rate and beyond then 1/3 distance barrier,

    G. Zhu, “A topological theory for qldpc: non-clifford gates and magic state fountain on homological product codes with constant rate and beyond then 1/3 distance barrier,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.19375(2025) . 20

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Transversal non-clifford gates on qldpc codes breaking the √ Ndistance barrier and quantum-inspired geometry with systolic freedom,

    G. Zhu, “Transversal non-clifford gates on qldpc codes breaking the √ Ndistance barrier and quantum-inspired geometry with systolic freedom,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15056(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Non-Invertible Defects in Nonlinear Sigma Models and Coupling to Topological Orders,

    P.-S. Hsin, “Non-Invertible Defects in Nonlinear Sigma Models and Coupling to Topological Orders,” 12, 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries

    S. Schafer-Nameki, “ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,”Phys. Rept.1063(2024) 1–55, arXiv:2305.18296 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries

    S.-H. Shao, “What’s Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetries,” inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics 2023: Aspects of Symmetry. 8, 2023. arXiv:2308.00747 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality

    A. Kapustin and N. Seiberg, “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality,”JHEP04(2014) 001, arXiv:1401.0740 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Comments on One-Form Global Symmetries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d

    P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and N. Seiberg, “Comments on One-Form Global Symmetries and Their Gauging in 3d and 4d,”SciPost Phys.6no. 3, (2019) 039,arXiv:1812.04716 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Lattice models that realizeZ n-1 symmetry-protected topological states for evenn,

    L. Tsui and X.-G. Wen, “Lattice models that realizeZ n-1 symmetry-protected topological states for evenn,” Phys. Rev. B101no. 3, (2020) 035101,arXiv:1908.02613 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Milnor, J

    J. Milnor, J. Stasheff, J. Stasheff, and P. University,Characteristic Classes. Annals of mathematics studies. Princeton University Press, 1974.https://books.google.com/books?id=5zQ9AFk1i4EC

    work page 1974

  27. [27]

    Loops in 4+1d Topological Phases,

    X. Chen, A. Dua, P.-S. Hsin, C.-M. Jian, W. Shirley, and C. Xu, “Loops in 4+1d Topological Phases,” 12, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Fractionalization of coset non-invertible symmetry and exotic Hall conductance,

    P.-S. Hsin, R. Kobayashi, and C. Zhang, “Fractionalization of coset non-invertible symmetry and exotic Hall conductance,”SciPost Phys.17no. 3, (2024) 095,arXiv:2405.20401 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Anomalies of Coset Non-Invertible Symmetries,

    P.-S. Hsin, R. Kobayashi, and C. Zhang, “Anomalies of Coset Non-Invertible Symmetries,” 2, 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Onsiteability of Higher-Form Symmetries

    Y. Feng, Y.-A. Chen, P.-S. Hsin, and R. Kobayashi, “Onsiteability of Higher-Form Symmetries,” arXiv:2510.23701 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    On 2-Group Global Symmetries and Their Anomalies

    F. Benini, C. C´ ordova, and P.-S. Hsin, “On 2-Group Global Symmetries and their Anomalies,”JHEP03 (2019) 118,arXiv:1803.09336 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries

    C. C´ ordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, and K. Intriligator, “Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries,”JHEP02(2019) 184,arXiv:1802.04790 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model,

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, “Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 16, (2022) 161601,arXiv:2205.05086 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies,

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori, “Noninvertible Chiral Symmetry and Exponential Hierarchies,”Phys. Rev. X13 no. 1, (2023) 011034,arXiv:2205.06243 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries,”JHEP02(2015) 172, arXiv:1412.5148 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    (3+1)-TQFTs and Topological Insulators

    K. Walker and Z. Wang, “(3+1)-TQFTs and Topological Insulators,”arXiv:1104.2632 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Three-dimensional topological lattice models with surface anyons,

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, F. J. Burnell, and S. H. Simon, “Three-dimensional topological lattice models with surface anyons,”Physical Review B87no. 4, (Jan., 2013) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.045107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.045107 2013

  38. [38]

    Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, “Theta, Time Reversal, and Temperature,”JHEP 05(2017) 091,arXiv:1703.00501 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Comments on Abelian Higgs Models and Persistent Order

    Z. Komargodski, A. Sharon, R. Thorngren, and X. Zhou, “Comments on Abelian Higgs Models and Persistent Order,”SciPost Phys.6no. 1, (2019) 003,arXiv:1705.04786 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    C-P-T anomaly matching in bosonic quantum field theory and spin chains

    T. Sulejmanpasic and Y. Tanizaki, “C-P-T anomaly matching in bosonic quantum field theory and spin chains,”Phys. Rev. B97no. 14, (2018) 144201,arXiv:1802.02153 [hep-th]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Anomalies and Odd Dimensions,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, S. Della Pietra, and G. W. Moore, “Anomalies and Odd Dimensions,”Annals Phys.163 (1985) 288

    work page 1985

  42. [42]

    Symmetry-protected topological phases in noninteracting fermion systems,

    X.-G. Wen, “Symmetry-protected topological phases in noninteracting fermion systems,”Physical Review B 85no. 8, (Feb., 2012) .http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085103

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.085103 2012

  43. [43]

    Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases

    E. Witten, “Fermion Path Integrals And Topological Phases,”Rev. Mod. Phys.88no. 3, (2016) 035001, arXiv:1508.04715 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Exceptional Chern-Simons-Matter Dualities,

    C. C´ ordova, P.-S. Hsin, and K. Ohmori, “Exceptional Chern-Simons-Matter Dualities,”SciPost Phys.7no. 4, (2019) 056,arXiv:1812.11705 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Classification of (2+1)D invertible fermionic topological phases with symmetry,

    M. Barkeshli, Y.-A. Chen, P.-S. Hsin, and N. Manjunath, “Classification of (2+1)D invertible fermionic topological phases with symmetry,”Phys. Rev. B105no. 23, (2022) 235143,arXiv:2109.11039 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Symmetry-enriched quantum spin liquids in (3 + 1)d,

    P.-S. Hsin and A. Turzillo, “Symmetry-enriched quantum spin liquids in (3 + 1)d,”JHEP09(2020) 022, arXiv:1904.11550 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations,

    D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang, “Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations,”Nature402no. 6760, (Nov., 1999) 390–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/46503

    work page doi:10.1038/46503 1999

  48. [48]

    The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum Computers

    D. Gottesman, “The Heisenberg representation of quantum computers,” in22nd International Colloquium on Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, pp. 32–43. 7, 1998.arXiv:quant-ph/9807006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  49. [49]

    Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas,

    S. Bravyi and A. Kitaev, “Universal quantum computation with ideal clifford gates and noisy ancillas,”Phys. Rev. A71(Feb, 2005) 022316

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    Qudit versions of the qubit “pi-over-eight

    M. Howard and J. Vala, “Qudit versions of the qubit “pi-over-eight” gate,”Physical Review A86no. 2, (Aug.,

    work page

  51. [51]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022316

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.022316

  52. [52]

    Magic-state distillation in all prime dimensions using quantum reed-muller codes,

    E. T. Campbell, H. Anwar, and D. E. Browne, “Magic-state distillation in all prime dimensions using quantum reed-muller codes,”Physical Review X2no. 4, (Dec., 2012) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.041021

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.2.041021 2012

  53. [53]

    The invariants of the Clifford groups

    G. Nebe, E. M. Rains, and N. J. A. Sloane, “The invariants of the clifford groups,”arXiv:math/0001038 [math.CO].https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0001038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Codes and Invariant Theory

    G. Nebe, E. M. Rains, and N. J. A. Sloane, “Codes and invariant theory,”arXiv:math/0311046 [math.NT]. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0311046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Surface code quantum computing by lattice surgery,

    D. Horsman, A. G. Fowler, S. Devitt, and R. Van Meter, “Surface code quantum computing by lattice surgery,”New J. Phys.14(11, 2011) 123011,arXiv:1111.4022 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    Classification of Topologically Protected Gates for Local Stabilizer Codes,

    S. Bravyi and R. K¨ onig, “Classification of Topologically Protected Gates for Local Stabilizer Codes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.110no. 17, (Apr., 2013) 170503–5

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    Unfolding the color code

    A. Kubica, B. Yoshida, and F. Pastawski, “Unfolding the color code,”New J. Phys.17no. 8, (2015) 083026, arXiv:1503.02065 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Pumping chirality in three dimensions,

    L. Fidkowski and M. B. Hastings, “Pumping chirality in three dimensions,”Phys. Rev. B109no. 23, (2024) 235142,arXiv:2309.15903 [cond-mat.str-el]. 22

    work page arXiv 2024