Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

The paper argues that one equation of state links heavy-ion collisions and neutron-star observations, and that combining all data sources into one Bayesian workflow is the field's next step.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 20:15 UTC pith:KZSEO2DO

load-bearing objection Competent invited review of three EOS frameworks, majority-authored; the unification claim is a roadmap, not a result, and the missing HIC-to-NS transfer map is the real soft spot. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.20378 v2 pith:KZSEO2DO submitted 2025-11-25 nucl-th astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRgr-qcnucl-ex

Toward a Unified Understanding of the Dense Matter Equation of State

Kshitij Agarwal , Johannes Jahan , Behruz Kardan , Peter T. H. Pang , Tom Reichert , Alexandra C. Semposki This is my paper
classification nucl-th astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRgr-qcnucl-ex
keywords equation of statedense nuclear matterheavy-ion collisionsneutron starsmulti-messenger astronomyBayesian inferenceBayesian model mixingQCD phase diagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the densest form of ordinary matter is best described by a single equation of state—the relation between pressure, density, temperature, and neutron–proton balance—that can be probed both in heavy-ion collisions and in neutron-star mergers. It reviews how each probe extracts this relation on its own, then surveys three collaborative software frameworks that combine information sources within one statistical analysis: a Bayesian multi-messenger inference tool, a modular calculation engine that merges EOS tables from different microphysical models, and a Bayesian model-mixing tool that blends competing theories with controlled uncertainties. The paper's central claim is that these frameworks can be chained into a single workflow, running from nuclear-theory priors through experimental and astrophysical likelihoods to a unified EOS posterior, and that this is the natural next step as the field enters a precision era of larger datasets. A sympathetic reader would care because the payoff is a single, more tightly constrained description of nuclear matter at two-to-five times nuclear saturation density, with quantified uncertainties, connecting laboratory experiments to the cosmos.

Core claim

The review's stated thesis is that the comparable conditions created in heavy-ion collisions and binary-neutron-star mergers make the equation of state the link between the two information sources, so that a complementary and unified approach can reduce uncertainties and explore the EOS more completely and self-consistently. After tracing the individual EOS-extraction methods from particle-flow, kaon, and pion measurements in collisions, and from gravitational-wave, X-ray, and radio observations of neutron stars, the paper argues that the technical components for a unified analysis already exist: a Bayesian inference framework that fuses multi-messenger and nuclear data; a modular engine tha

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the equation of state (EOS) of dense nuclear matter, treated as a single transferable function of density, temperature, and isospin asymmetry across the QCD phase diagram. Three complementary mechanisms carry the argument. First, Bayesian inference: a likelihood-based framework that combines gravitational-wave, kilonova, gamma-ray-burst, radio-mass, and X-ray-radius measurements, plus nuclear-experiment constraints, into an EOS posterior. Second, modular EOS construction: a calculation engine that joins crust, chiral-effective-field-theory, chiral-mean-field, and lattice-QCD-derived EOS modules—including smooth or first-order matching prescriptions and a lepton mod

Load-bearing premise

The entire program depends on a single equation of state being transferable between the hot, nearly symmetric matter created in heavy-ion collisions and the cold, highly neutron-rich matter inside neutron stars; if those regimes are not governed by the same function, the combined posterior would be averaging over different physics.

What would settle it

Compute EOS posteriors from heavy-ion data alone and from neutron-star observations alone over the overlapping density range of roughly 2–5 times nuclear saturation density, using fixed, benchmarked simulation models. If the two 90% credible intervals exclude each other—or if the joint analysis's central EOS shifts by more than the individual credible intervals—the single-transferable-EOS assumption is falsified. A concrete quantity to compare is the pressure at three times saturation density.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Heavy-ion measurements of flow, pions, and sub-threshold kaons and neutron-star measurements of tidal deformability and radius would sharpen the same EOS posterior instead of separate ones, so each dataset tightens the other.
  • The combined constraints cover a wider density range than either probe alone—roughly 1–5 times saturation density from collisions and 2–10 times from neutron stars—leaving fewer unconstrained regions of the phase diagram.
  • The workflow would produce standardized EOS tables with rigorously propagated uncertainties, directly usable as input to neutron-star-merger and supernova simulations.
  • Discrepancies between heavy-ion-only and astrophysics-only inferences would become a genuine diagnostic—pointing either to unaccounted systematic errors in transport models or to new physics such as a phase transition that breaks the single-EOS description.
  • With next-generation gravitational-wave detectors and new heavy-ion facilities feeding the same pipeline, radius uncertainties could approach the sub-kilometre level, tightening predictions of neutron-star structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unification program could be tested before the next generation of data arrives: run the full pipeline on synthetic data generated from one known EOS using independent simulation codes, and check whether the joint posterior recovers the input EOS; if it does not, the bottleneck is modelling rather than data volume.
  • If the single-EOS transfer fails at quantitative precision, the natural generalization is an EOS surface in temperature and proton fraction rather than a single cold curve—this would still unify the datasets and would directly map the QCD phase diagram, including the location of a possible critical endpoint.
  • Because the reviewed tools are modular and open, a realistic near-term outcome is a shared, continuously updated constraint database in which any new heavy-ion or astrophysical measurement automatically propagates to all downstream EOS predictions, turning one-off analyses into a living constraint.
  • The same Bayesian model-mixing machinery could be applied in the high-temperature region—interpolating between lattice-QCD-based and holographic or hadronic EOSs—to test where the crossover turns into a first-order transition, a question the review mentions but does not pursue.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review and outlook article aimed at unifying the extraction of the dense-matter equation of state (EOS) from relativistic heavy-ion collisions (HIC) and multi-messenger astrophysics (MMA). It surveys the experimental and theoretical methods for EOS extraction from HIC and neutron-star observations, then describes three computational frameworks: NMMA (Bayesian multi-messenger inference), MUSES (modular EOS calculation engine), and BAND (Bayesian model-mixing/calibration tools). The paper reproduces the key likelihood and fitting equations used by these frameworks, summarizes their published constraints, and concludes with a proposed unified workflow (Fig. 17) that would feed nuclear theory priors from MUSES, model-mixing/calibration tools from BAND, and astrophysical likelihoods from NMMA into a single EOS posterior. The review is accurate at the level of the equations and citations checked, but it contains no new quantitative results; its central contribution is a synthesis and a forward-looking roadmap.

Significance. If taken as a roadmap, the paper is a useful and timely synthesis of three important, actively developed open-source frameworks. Its strengths include accurate reproduction of the gravitational-wave, kilonova, and afterglow likelihoods (Eqs. 1–11), a fair treatment of transport-model systematics (Sec. 2.1.3, Sec. 4.1), and explicit attention to reproducibility via open-source repositories. The proposed unified workflow is not yet a demonstrated pipeline, and the paper is honest about many obstacles. However, the central claim—that HIC and BNS-merger constraints can be combined into a single EOS posterior—is stated more strongly than the physics currently supports, because the two data sets constrain different regions of the QCD phase diagram with no specified transfer map. The review would be valuable after clarifying that the unified posterior is a goal requiring a model-dependent extrapolation, not an existing capability.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 1 and Sec. 4.4 / Fig. 17] The central thesis, 'the EOS serves as the link' between HIC and BNS mergers, is not yet well-defined as a single-object posterior. HIC observables constrain finite-temperature, near-symmetric matter (x_p ≈ 0.5), whereas NMMA and BAND operate on cold, β-equilibrated neutron-star EOS tables; Sec. 3.2.3 explicitly states the MUSES finite-T and T≈0 regimes 'are not connected so far.' Fig. 17 passes 'EOS priors' between stages but contains no module mapping (n_B, T, x_p) from HIC conditions to β-equilibrium cold matter, nor any shared parameter space. As written, the output is a posterior over a model that extrapolates in T and isospin, not over a single measured EOS. Please either specify a concrete EOS representation covering the full phase diagram with a β-equilibrium projection, or reframe the claim as a two-stage constraint with a model-dependent bridge and quantify the resulting system
  2. [Sec. 2.1.3 and Sec. 4.1] The paper states that transport-model differences 'are, unfortunately, sometimes larger for given observables than the choice of the EOS' (Sec. 2.1.3), and Sec. 4.1 notes that TMEP benchmarking does not yet cover Elab = 1–10A GeV. This is a load-bearing caveat for the unified workflow: without a quantitative treatment of transport-code systematics, the 'likelihoods from nuclear data' in Fig. 17 are not likelihoods on the EOS alone. The unified framework should show how these model uncertainties are marginalized over (e.g., as nuisance parameters or via BAND-style model mixing) and should state explicitly that quantitative control is not yet available at the densities most relevant to the proposed synthesis.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] 'constraint the EOS' should be 'constrain the EOS'.
  2. [Sec. 3.1.4] The in-text reference 'as shown in Fig. 3.1.4' appears to be a section number mistaken for a figure number; the intended figure is likely Fig. 7.
  3. [Fig. 11 caption] The caption contains an editorial note '[JJ: UPDATE line from ˆµB = 2 → 2.5]' that must be removed before publication.
  4. [Fig. 10 caption] Typo: 'nuleonic' should be 'nucleonic'.
  5. [Table 1 caption] Typo: 'biary neutron star mergers' should be 'binary neutron star mergers'.
  6. [Eq. (19)] The mixing function α(x,ξ) is described only as 'a sigmoid function'; please define it explicitly and state the hyperprior used for ξ, since the kernel behavior depends on it.
  7. [References] Several references contain placeholder or malformed entries, e.g., Ref. [95] has 'Cambridge University Press, ??? (2020)' with a missing place; many Zenodo DOIs appear twice in the same reference string.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review with no derivation chain; the unification claim is an outlook statement and the hot/cold regime gap is explicitly admitted, so no circular reduction is present.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation or prediction paper: it surveys methods and frameworks (NMMA, MUSES, BAND) and sketches a possible future unified workflow in Fig. 17. The central claim that the EOS can link heavy-ion collisions and binary neutron star mergers is introduced as a perspective citing external work [22], and the paper repeatedly acknowledges that the regimes are not yet connected: 'At the moment, the different modules available in the MUSES CE offer two distinctive regimes where the nuclear EOS can be generated, which are not connected so far' (Sec. 3.2.3). That admission directly rules out any claim that a unified EOS posterior is already being derived. The heavy reliance on self-citations (NMMA [23], MUSES [24], BAND [25,26]) describes open-source, code-reproduced frameworks and their published applications; no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from those works to forbid alternatives. The BAND Gaussian-process model mixing is transparently presented as interpolation trained on means and covariances from chi-EFT and pQCD, with the hyperprior choices stated, so its intermediate-region output is not an independent prediction being passed off as derived. Transport-model systematic uncertainties that can dominate EOS effects are also flagged (Sec. 2.1.3). Thus there is no circular step: the limitations cited are correctness risks, not evidence of circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper is a review, so it introduces no new free parameters or invented physical entities. The axioms listed are the domain assumptions that the unification roadmap depends on, several of which the paper itself flags as unresolved.

axioms (3)
  • domain assumption A single EOS links heavy-ion collision and neutron-star regimes across the QCD phase diagram.
    Stated in Sec. 1: 'Given the comparable conditions created in heavy-ion collisions and binary neutron star (BNS) mergers, the EOS serves as the link between the two information sources'. The entire unification thesis depends on this transferability.
  • domain assumption Transport models can eventually be benchmarked so that their systematic uncertainties are smaller than the EOS dependence of observables.
    Sec. 2.1.3 concedes 'model differences are, unfortunately, sometimes larger for given observables than the choice of the EOS'. The precision-era roadmap in Sec. 4.1 assumes this can be overcome, which is not yet established.
  • domain assumption Bayesian model mixing weights (Eq. 16) provide a calibrated way to combine discrepant theoretical models.
    Sec. 3.3.2 defines the BMM framework; the review treats the resulting mixed model as a trustworthy EOS prior, though the BAND papers themselves note that BMM methods are still maturing (Sec. 3.3.1).
invented entities (1)
  • Unified EOS workflow (Fig. 17) no independent evidence
    purpose: Proposed integration of MUSES, BAND, NMMA, CompOSE, and emulators into a single analysis pipeline.
    This is a workflow diagram, not a physical entity with a falsifiable handle. It is an organizational proposal with no independent empirical constraint.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 58635 in / 9097 out tokens · 93441 ms · 2026-08-03T20:15:06.497151+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Efforts to understand the equation of state (EOS) of dense nuclear matter at supra-saturation densities have grown more sophisticated over the past decade, driven by a surge in high-precision data from both terrestrial experiments and astrophysical observations. While for the former, heavy-ion collisions (HIC) represent a unique opportunity to constrain the EOS in a controlled laboratory setting, the latter can be precisely probed thanks to the advent of multi-messenger astronomy (MMA). However, as we move away from understanding drawn from individual sources and limited statistics to the era of precision physics with improved datasets, the need for a systematic way to combine them becomes clear. In this article, we trace the individual methods for extracting the EOS both for HIC and MMA. We then review the current state-of-the-art collaborative efforts to combine these individual sources of information, focusing on: the Nuclear Physics and Multi-Messenger Astrophysics (NMMA) framework, which relies on Bayesian inference methods; the Modular Unified Solver for the Equation of State (MUSES) calculation engine, which integrates EOS priors with HIC data and produces predictions for key neutron star properties; and the Bayesian Analysis of Nuclear Dynamics (BAND) framework, which uses cutting-edge Bayesian methods to produce reliable and trustworthy predictions for nuclear and astrophysical problems. We highlight the scientific advances with respect to the EOS and neutron star properties made possible by each framework and outline the remaining challenges that must be addressed to build a coherent, predictive picture of dense nuclear matter across all relevant regimes. We conclude with a detailed discussion of how these frameworks might be integrated with each other to form a unified workflow for future EOS predictions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PMM-IMSRG emulator for the nuclear equation of state with quantified uncertainties

    nucl-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A parametric-matrix-model emulator reproduces IMSRG nuclear-matter energies with calibrated conformal-prediction error bars, enabling Bayesian fitting of three-nucleon couplings to saturation properties.

  2. Studying the QCD Matter produced in Heavy-Ion Collisions using the MUSES Calculation Engine

    nucl-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The MUSES Calliope engine computes multi-dimensional QCD equations of state, merges them consistently, and feeds them into viscous hydrodynamic simulations of heavy-ion collisions with movable critical points and crit...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    ELI-NP, Magurele (2017)

    Bracco, A., et al.(eds.): NuPECC Long Range Plan 2017: Perspectives in Nuclear Physics. ELI-NP, Magurele (2017). Available at http://www.nupecc.org/pub/lrp17/lrp2017.pdf. Accessed: 2025-09-01

    2017

  2. [2]

    Gross, F., et al.: 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1125 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2 arXiv:2212.11107 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Lattimer, J.M.: Neutron Stars and the Nuclear Matter Equation of State. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71, 433–464 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-124827

    doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-124827 2021

  4. [4]

    Nature Commun

    Annala, E., Gorda, T., Hirvonen, J., Komoltsev, O., Kurkela, A., N¨ attil¨ a, J., Vuorinen, A.: Strongly interacting matter exhibits deconfined behavior in massive neutron stars. Nature Commun. 14(1), 8451 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44051-y arXiv:2303.11356 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Sorensen, A., et al.: Dense nuclear matter equation of state from heavy-ion collisions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 134, 104080 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104080 arXiv:2301.13253 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Durante, M., et al.: All the Fun of the F AIR: Fundamental physics at the Facility for Antipro- ton and Ion Research. Phys. Scripta 94(3), 033001 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aaf93f arXiv:1903.05693 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Aumann, T., Bertulani, C.A., Duer, M., Galatyuk, T., Obertelli, A., Panin, V., Rodr ´ ıguez-S´ anchez, J.L., Roth, R., Stroth, J.: Nuclear structure opportunities with GeV radioactive beams at F AIR. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 382(2275), 20230121 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0121

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Du, L., Sorensen, A., Stephanov, M.: The QCD phase diagram and Beam Energy Scan physics: A the- ory overview. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33(07), 2430008 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811294679 0007 arXiv:2402.10183 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Blaschke, D., et al.: Topical issue on Exploring Strongly Interacting Matter at High Densities - NICA White Paper. Eur. Phys. J. A 52(8), 267 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16267-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16267-x 2016

  10. [10]

    Kekelidze, V.D., Matveev, V.A., Meshkov, I.N., Sorin, A.S., Trubnikov, G.V.: Project Nuclotron- based Ion Collider fAcility at JINR. Phys. Part. Nucl.48(5), 727–741 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1063779617050239

    2017

  11. [11]

    Updated 2023

    FRIB Science Community: The Scientific Case for the 400 MeV/u Energy Upgrade of FRIB. Updated 2023. Available at: https://frib.msu.edu/sites/default/files/ files/pdfs/frib400 final.pdf (2019). \protect\unhbox\voidb@x\hbox{https://frib.msu.edu/sites/default/files/ files/pdfs/frib400 final.pdf }

    2023

  12. [12]

    Brown, B.A., et al.: Motivations for early high-profile FRIB experiments. J. Phys. G 52(5), 050501 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/adb449 arXiv:2410.06144 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    : S πRIT: A time-projection chamber for symmetry-energy studies

    Shane, R., et al. : S πRIT: A time-projection chamber for symmetry-energy studies. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 784, 513–517 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.01.026 arXiv:1409.6343 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Nature Phys

    Adamczewski-Musch, J., et al.: Probing dense baryon-rich matter with virtual photons. Nature Phys. 15(10), 1040–1045 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0583-8

    doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0583-8 2019

  15. [15]

    Aasi, J., et al.: Advanced LIGO. Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 074001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/32/7/074001 arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Acernese, F., et al.: Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detec- tor. Class. Quant. Grav. 32(2), 024001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/2/024001 arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc] 44

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Abbott, R., et al.: Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3. Phys. Rev. X 13(1), 011048 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Astrophys

    Kiendrebeogo, R.W., et al.: Updated Observing Scenarios and Multimessenger Implications for the International Gravitational-wave Networks O4 and O5. Astrophys. J. 958(2), 158 (2023) https://doi. org/10.3847/1538-4357/acfcb1 arXiv:2306.09234 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    : Constraining the Dense Matter Equation of State with New NICER Mass–Radius Measurements and New Chiral Effective Field Theory Inputs

    Rutherford, N., et al. : Constraining the Dense Matter Equation of State with New NICER Mass–Radius Measurements and New Chiral Effective Field Theory Inputs. Astrophys. J. Lett. 971(1), 19 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad5f02 arXiv:2407.06790 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Zhang, S.-N., et al.: The enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry mission—eXTP for launch in 2030. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68(11), 119502 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6 arXiv:2506.08101 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2030

  21. [21]

    Li, A., et al.: Dense Matter in Neutron Stars with eXTP (2025) arXiv:2506.08104 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Yao, N., Sorensen, A., Dexheimer, V., Noronha-Hostler, J.: Structure in the speed of sound: From neutron stars to heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C 109(6), 065803 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.109.065803 arXiv:2311.18819 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Nature Commun

    Pang, P.T.H., et al.: An updated nuclear-physics and multi-messenger astrophysics framework for binary neutron star mergers. Nature Commun. 14(1), 8352 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-023-43932-6 arXiv:2205.08513 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Reinke Pelicer, M., et al.: Building neutron stars with the MUSES calculation engine. Phys. Rev. D 111(10), 103037 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.103037 arXiv:2502.07902 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Phillips, D.R., Furnstahl, R.J., Heinz, U., Maiti, T., Nazarewicz, W., Nunes, F.M., Plumlee, M., Pratola, M.T., Pratt, S., Viens, F.G., Wild, S.M.: Get on the BAND Wagon: A Bayesian Framework for Quantifying Model Uncertainties in Nuclear Dynamics. J. Phys. G 48(7), 072001 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abf1df arXiv:2012.07704 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    https://github.com/bandframework/ bandframework

    Chan, M.Y.-H., DeBoer, R.J., Furnstahl, R.J., Liyanage, D., Nunes, F.M., Odell, D., Phillips, D.R., Plumlee, M., Semposki, A.C., S¨ urer, O., Wild, S.M.: BANDFramework: An Open-Source Framework for Bayesian Analysis of Nuclear Dynamics (2022). https://github.com/bandframework/ bandframework

    2022

  27. [27]

    Koehn, H., et al.: From existing and new nuclear and astrophysical constraints to stringent limits on the equation of state of neutron-rich dense matter. Phys. Rev. X 15(2), 021014 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021014 arXiv:2402.04172 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Heinz, U.W., Jacob, M.: Evidence for a new state of matter: An Assessment of the results from the CERN lead beam program (2000) arXiv:nucl-th/0002042

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    Science 337, 310–314 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1215901

    Jacak, B.V., Muller, B.: The exploration of hot nuclear matter. Science 337, 310–314 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.1215901

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1215901 2012

  30. [30]

    Muller, B., Schukraft, J., Wyslouch, B.: First Results from Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 361–386 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094910 arXiv:1202.3233 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  31. [31]

    Braun-Munzinger, P., Koch, V., Sch¨ afer, T., Stachel, J.: Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rept. 621, 76–126 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep. 2015.12.003 arXiv:1510.00442 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Acharya, S., et al.: The ALICE experiment: a journey through QCD. Eur. Phys. J. C 84(8), 813 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12935-y arXiv:2211.04384 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Hayrapetyan, A., et al.: Overview of high-density QCD studies with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Rept. 1115, 219–367 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2024.11.007 arXiv:2405.10785 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Nature 561(7723), 321–330 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6 arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

    Andronic, A., et al.: Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy. Nature 561(7723), 321–330 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0491-6 arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Bazavov, A., et al.: Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials. Phys. Lett. B 795, 15–21 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.013 arXiv:1812.08235 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Borsanyi, S., et al.: QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(5), 052001 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.052001 arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Borsanyi, S., Fodor, Z., Guenther, J.N., Parotto, P., Pasztor, A., Pirelli, L., Szabo, K.K., Wong, C.H.: QCD deconfinement transition line up to µB=400 MeV from finite volume lattice simulations. Phys. Rev. D 110(11), 114507 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.114507 arXiv:2410.06216 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Borsanyi, S., Fodor, Z., Guenther, J.N., Parotto, P., Pasztor, A., Ratti, C., Vovchenko, V., Wong, C.H.: Lattice QCD constraints on the critical point from an improved precision equation of state (2025) arXiv:2502.10267 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Poberezhnyuk, R., Vovchenko, V., Motornenko, A., Gorenstein, M.I., Stoecker, H.: Chemical freeze- out conditions and fluctuations of conserved charges in heavy-ion collisions within quantum van der Waals model. Phys. Rev. C 100(5), 054904 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054904 arXiv:1906.01954 [hep-ph] 45

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Gunkel, P.J., Fischer, C.S.: Locating the critical endpoint of QCD: Mesonic backcoupling effects. Phys. Rev. D 104(5), 054022 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054022 arXiv:2106.08356 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Fu, W.-j., Pawlowski, J.M., Rennecke, F.: QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density. Phys. Rev. D 101(5), 054032 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.054032 arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Gao, F., Pawlowski, J.M.: QCD phase structure from functional methods. Phys. Rev. D 102(3), 034027 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.034027 arXiv:2002.07500 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Sorensen, A., Sorensen, P.: Locating the critical point for the hadron to quark-gluon plasma phase transition from finite-size scaling of proton cumulants in heavy-ion collisions (2024) arXiv:2405.10278 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Shah, H., Hippert, M., Noronha, J., Ratti, C., Vovchenko, V.: Locating the QCD critical point from first principles through contours of constant entropy density (2024) arXiv:2410.16206 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Hippert, M., Grefa, J., Manning, T.A., Noronha, J., Noronha-Hostler, J., Portillo Vazquez, I., Ratti, C., Rougemont, R., Trujillo, M.: Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective. Phys. Rev. D 110(9), 094006 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.094006 arXiv:2309.00579 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Cai, R.-G., He, S., Li, L., Wang, Y.-X.: Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics. Phys. Rev. D 106(12), 121902 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106. L121902 arXiv:2201.02004 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Steinheimer, J., Omana Kuttan, M., Reichert, T., Nara, Y., Bleicher, M.: Simultaneous description of high density QCD matter in heavy ion collisions and neutron star observations. Phys. Lett. B 867, 139605 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139605 arXiv:2501.12849 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Basar, G.: QCD critical point, Lee-Yang edge singularities, and Pad´ e resummations. Phys. Rev. C 110(1), 015203 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.015203 arXiv:2312.06952 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    PoS LA TTICE2023, 168 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.453.0168 arXiv:2401.08820 [hep-lat]

    Clarke, D.A., Dimopoulos, P., Di Renzo, F., Goswami, J., Schmidt, C., Singh, S., Zambello, K.: Searching for the QCD critical point using Lee-Yang edge singularities. PoS LA TTICE2023, 168 (2024) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.453.0168 arXiv:2401.08820 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Clarke, D.A., Dimopoulos, P., Di Renzo, F., Goswami, J., Schmidt, C., Singh, S., Zambello, K.: Search- ing for the QCD critical endpoint using multi-point Pad´ e approximations (2024) arXiv:2405.10196 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Adamczyk, L., et al.: Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions from the Beam Energy Scan Program. Phys. Rev. C 96(4), 044904 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.96.044904 arXiv:1701.07065 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Vovchenko, V., Begun, V.V., Gorenstein, M.I.: Hadron multiplicities and chemical freeze-out con- ditions in proton-proton and nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. C 93(6), 064906 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.064906 arXiv:1512.08025 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Vovchenko, V., Gorenstein, M.I., Stoecker, H.: Finite resonance widths influence the thermal-model description of hadron yields. Phys. Rev. C 98(3), 034906 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC. 98.034906 arXiv:1807.02079 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Lysenko, A., Gorenstein, M.I., Poberezhniuk, R., Vovchenko, V.: Chemical freeze-out curve in heavy- ion collisions and the QCD critical point. Phys. Rev. C 111(5), 054903 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.111.054903 arXiv:2408.06473 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Alba, P., Alberico, W., Bellwied, R., Bluhm, M., Mantovani Sarti, V., Nahrgang, M., Ratti, C.: Freeze- out conditions from net-proton and net-charge fluctuations at RHIC. Phys. Lett. B 738, 305–310 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.09.052 arXiv:1403.4903 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    Becattini, F., Steinheimer, J., Stock, R., Bleicher, M.: Hadronization conditions in relativistic nuclear collisions and the QCD pseudo-critical line. Phys. Lett. B 764, 241–246 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physletb.2016.11.033 arXiv:1605.09694 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Sagun, V.V., Bugaev, K.A., Ivanytskyi, A.I., Yakimenko, I.P., Nikonov, E.G., Taranenko, A.V., Greiner, C., Blaschke, D.B., Zinovjev, G.M.: Hadron Resonance Gas Model with Induced Surface Ten- sion. Eur. Phys. J. A 54(6), 100 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2018-12535-1 arXiv:1703.00049 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Cleymans, J., Redlich, K.: Unified description of freezeout parameters in relativistic heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5284–5286 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5284 arXiv:nucl-th/9808030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  59. [59]

    Reichert, T., Inghirami, G., Bleicher, M.: Probing chemical freeze-out criteria in relativistic nuclear collisions with coarse grained transport simulations. Eur. Phys. J. A 56(10), 267 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00273-y arXiv:2007.06440 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Herrmann, N., Wessels, J.P., Wienold, T.: Collective flow in heavy ion collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 49, 581–632 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.49.1.581

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.49.1.581 1999

  61. [61]

    Danielewicz, P.: Flow and the equation of state of nuclear matter. Nucl. Phys. A 685, 368–383 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00554-1 arXiv:nucl-th/0009091

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  62. [62]

    Science 298, 1592–1596 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078070 arXiv:nucl-th/0208016

    Danielewicz, P., Lacey, R., Lynch, W.G.: Determination of the equation of state of dense matter. Science 298, 1592–1596 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078070 arXiv:nucl-th/0208016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  63. [63]

    Aichelin, J., Ko, C.M.: Subthreshold Kaon Production as a Probe of the Nuclear Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2661–2663 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2661 46

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.2661 1985

  64. [64]

    Fuchs, C.: Kaon production in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 56, 1–103 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2005.07.004 arXiv:nucl-th/0507017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  65. [65]

    Gustafsson, H.A., et al.: Collective Flow Observed in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1590–1593 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1590

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.1590 1984

  66. [66]

    Gutbrod, H.H., Poskanzer, A.M., Ritter, H.G.: PLASTIC BALL EXPERIMENTS. Rept. Prog. Phys. 52, 1267 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/52/10/003

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/52/10/003 1989

  67. [67]

    (ed.) The Path to Heavy Ions at LHC and Beyond, pp

    Gutbrod, H.H.: In: Rafelski, J. (ed.) The Path to Heavy Ions at LHC and Beyond, pp. 97–106 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17545-4 13

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17545-4 2016

  68. [68]

    Renfordt, R.E., et al.: Stopping Power and Collective Flow of Nuclear Matter in the Reaction Ar+Pb at 0.8 GeV/u. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 763–766 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.763

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.53.763 1984

  69. [69]

    Danielewicz, P., Odyniec, G.: Transverse Momentum Analysis of Collective Motion in Relativistic Nuclear Collisions. Phys. Lett. B 157, 146–150 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91535-7 arXiv:2109.05308 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1985

  70. [70]

    Gosset, J., et al.: Nuclear collective flow from Gaussian fits to triple differential distributions. Phys. Lett. B 247, 233–237 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)90888-D

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90888-d 1990

  71. [71]

    Demoulins, M., et al.: Measurement of a baryon azimuthal emission pattern in Ne + (NaF, Nb, Pb) collisions at 800-MeV per nucleon. Phys. Lett. B 241, 476–480 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-2693(90)91855-6

    1990

  72. [72]

    Sturm, C.T., et al.: Evidence for a soft nuclear equation of state from kaon production in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 39–42 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.39 arXiv:nucl- ex/0011001

    arXiv 2001

  73. [73]

    Particles 5(1), 21–39 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.3390/particles5010003

    Senger, P.: Pioneering the Equation of State of Dense Nuclear Matter with Strange Particles Emitted in Heavy-Ion Collisions: The KaoS Experiment at GSI. Particles 5(1), 21–39 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.3390/particles5010003

    work page doi:10.3390/particles5010003 2022

  74. [74]

    Andronic, A., et al.: Excitation function of elliptic flow in Au+Au collisions and the nuclear matter equation of state. Phys. Lett. B 612, 173–180 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.02.060 arXiv:nucl-ex/0411024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  75. [75]

    : Systematics of azimuthal asymmetries in heavy ion collisions in the 1 A GeV regime

    Reisdorf, W., et al. : Systematics of azimuthal asymmetries in heavy ion collisions in the 1 A GeV regime. Nucl. Phys. A 876, 1–60 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.12.006 arXiv:1112.3180 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  76. [76]

    Adamczewski-Musch, J., et al.: Directed, Elliptic, and Higher Order Flow Harmonics of Protons, Deuterons, and Tritons in Au + Au Collisions at √sN N= 2.4 GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 262301 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.262301 arXiv:2005.12217 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Adamczewski-Musch, J., et al.: Proton, deuteron and triton flow measurements in Au+Au collisions at√sNN = 2.4 GeV. Eur. Phys. J. A59(4), 80 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00936-6 arXiv:2208.02740 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Liu, H., et al.: Sideward flow in Au + Au collisions between 2-A-GeV and 8-A-GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5488–5492 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5488 arXiv:nucl-ex/0005005

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  79. [79]

    Pinkenburg, C., et al.: Elliptic flow: Transition from out-of-plane to in-plane emission in Au + Au collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1295–1298 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1295 arXiv:nucl-ex/9903010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  80. [80]

    Barrette, J., et al.: Proton and pion production relative to the reaction plane in Au + Au collisions at AGS energies. Phys. Rev. C 56, 3254–3264 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.56.3254 arXiv:nucl-ex/9707002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

Showing first 80 references.