pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.02215 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.chem-ph· quant-ph

Magnetoelectric effect in the mixed valence polyoxovanadate cage V₁₂

Piotr Koz{\l}owski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords magnetoelectric effectpolyoxovanadatesmixed valenceitinerant electronsV12 cageelectric field controlmolecular magnets
0
0 comments X

The pith

In mixed-valence V12 polyoxovanadate cages, an electric field controls magnetic properties mainly by relocating itinerant electrons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines two versions of the V12As8O40(HCO2) anion carrying different numbers of electrons to determine how an electric field changes their magnetic behavior. Calculations show that the main response comes from the electric field moving the mobile electrons to new positions inside the cage. This movement produces a magnetoelectric effect that varies sharply with field direction and with the total charge on the molecule. A reader would care because the calculations indicate the effect can be observed at room temperature, pointing to a route for electric control of molecular spins.

Core claim

The magnetoelectric effect in these molecules is induced mostly by relocation of itinerant electrons, is highly anisotropic, depends on the valence state and can be detected even at room temperature. The demonstration rests on effective Hamiltonian calculations and density functional theory calculations that were informed by existing magnetic measurements on the two isostructural anions with n=3 and n=5.

What carries the argument

Relocation of itinerant electrons under an applied electric field, as modeled by effective Hamiltonian calculations and density functional theory.

If this is right

  • Electric fields can manipulate the spin states of these polyoxovanadate cages without requiring large magnetic fields.
  • The strength and sign of the magnetoelectric response differ between the two valence states studied (n=3 and n=5).
  • The high anisotropy implies that the orientation of the molecule relative to the electric field must be controlled for maximum effect.
  • Because the effect survives to room temperature, the molecules remain candidates for practical electric-field-controlled spin devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the relocation mechanism dominates, similar mixed-valence cages with different ligands could be screened computationally for stronger room-temperature responses.
  • Device architectures might align many V12 units on a surface to exploit the anisotropy for collective electric switching of magnetic moments.
  • The same calculations could be extended to predict how solvent molecules or surface interactions modify the electric-field-induced electron shifts.

Load-bearing premise

The effective Hamiltonian and DFT calculations, calibrated only to existing magnetic measurements, correctly capture the electric-field-induced relocation of itinerant electrons without missing important correlation or solvent effects.

What would settle it

Experimental measurement of the change in magnetization or susceptibility when an electric field is applied to actual V12 samples, with particular attention to whether the anisotropy and room-temperature signal match the calculated dependence on field direction and valence state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.02215 by Piotr Koz{\l}owski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. upper panel: Structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Spin density for molecule [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Local magnetizations and corelations at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Electric field dependence of probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Magnetic correlations for molecule [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The ground state and two lowest excited states of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Global ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Electric field dependence of probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Magnetic correlations for molecule [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Electric field dependence of probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The ground state and a couple of the lowest excited [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Examples of exchange transfer in the ES. upper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Electric field dependence of probability to find [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Development of spintronic and quantum computing devices increases demand for efficient, energy saving method of spin manipulation at molecular scale. Polyoxovanadate molecular magnets being susceptible to both electric and magnetic fields may serve here as a good base material. In this paper two isostructural anions [V$_{12}$As$_8$O$_{40}$(HCO$_2$)]$^{n-}$ (with $n=3,5$) featuring two different mixed-valence states with itinerant and localized valence electrons are studied. The impact of the electric field on their magnetic properties is investigated by means of two complementary methods informed by magnetic measurements: effective Hamiltonian calculations and density functional theory. It is demonstrated that the magnetoelectric effect in theses molecules is induced mostly by relocation of itinerant electrons, is highly anisotropic, depends on the valence state and can be detected even at room temperature. These findings can pave the way to practical applications in which an electric field control over spin state is required.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the magnetoelectric effect in two isostructural mixed-valence polyoxovanadate anions [V_{12}As_8O_{40}(HCO_2)]^{n-} (n=3,5) using effective Hamiltonian calculations and density functional theory, both informed by prior magnetic measurements. It claims that the effect arises predominantly from electric-field-induced relocation of itinerant electrons, is highly anisotropic, depends on the valence state, and remains detectable at room temperature.

Significance. If the central predictions hold, the work would be significant for molecular spintronics by identifying a mechanism for electric-field control of spins in polyoxovanadates, with the room-temperature persistence and anisotropy offering practical relevance. The complementary use of two methods grounded in existing magnetic data is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods and Results sections] The effective Hamiltonian and DFT results rest on parameters fitted exclusively to magnetic data (exchange couplings and zero-field splittings). No independent validation or sensitivity test is provided for the electric-field coupling to charge density that drives the claimed itinerant-electron relocation, which is load-bearing for the anisotropy and temperature-dependence conclusions.
  2. [Results] No numerical magnetoelectric coefficients, error bars, or direct quantitative comparison between the effective-Hamiltonian and DFT predictions (or with experiment) are reported, leaving the strength of the 'mostly by relocation' claim and its valence-state dependence difficult to assess.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Typo in the abstract: 'theses molecules' should read 'these molecules'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and Results sections] The effective Hamiltonian and DFT results rest on parameters fitted exclusively to magnetic data (exchange couplings and zero-field splittings). No independent validation or sensitivity test is provided for the electric-field coupling to charge density that drives the claimed itinerant-electron relocation, which is load-bearing for the anisotropy and temperature-dependence conclusions.

    Authors: The electric-field coupling to the charge density is obtained directly from DFT calculations of the molecular charge response under applied fields, rather than being fitted to magnetic data. The magnetic parameters (exchange and zero-field splitting) are taken from prior experiments, but the electric-field term is computed ab initio within the same DFT setup used for the structures. To address the request for validation, we have performed a sensitivity analysis by varying the electric-field coupling strength by ±20% around the DFT-derived value; the anisotropy, valence-state dependence, and persistence to room temperature remain robust. These tests and associated plots will be added to the revised Methods and Results sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] No numerical magnetoelectric coefficients, error bars, or direct quantitative comparison between the effective-Hamiltonian and DFT predictions (or with experiment) are reported, leaving the strength of the 'mostly by relocation' claim and its valence-state dependence difficult to assess.

    Authors: We agree that numerical values strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will tabulate the magnetoelectric coefficients (in SI units) extracted from both the effective Hamiltonian and DFT for the two valence states, together with uncertainty estimates obtained by propagating the experimental uncertainties in the input magnetic parameters. A direct side-by-side comparison of the electric-field-induced magnetization changes will also be included to quantify the agreement between the two methods and to support the 'mostly by relocation' conclusion. No experimental magnetoelectric data exist for these compounds, so a comparison with measurement is not possible at present; the calculations instead provide concrete, testable predictions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; predictions independent of magnetic calibration inputs

full rationale

The paper applies effective-Hamiltonian and DFT methods informed by existing magnetic measurements to compute electric-field effects on spin properties via itinerant-electron relocation. The abstract and available text present the magnetoelectric anisotropy and temperature dependence as outputs of these models rather than re-derivations of the input magnetic data. No equations, self-citations, or definitional steps are exhibited that reduce the electric-response predictions to the magnetic fits by construction. The derivation therefore retains independent content and is scored as self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that standard effective-Hamiltonian and DFT treatments of mixed-valence vanadium clusters remain valid when an external electric field is added; no new entities or ad-hoc parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Effective Hamiltonian and DFT calculations, calibrated to existing magnetic data, accurately predict electric-field effects on spin and charge distribution in these clusters.
    Invoked to justify the two complementary methods used to study the magnetoelectric response.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5479 in / 1247 out tokens · 32525 ms · 2026-05-17T02:08:53.310614+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Local magnetizations in the IS FIG

    Local magnetizations and correlations are defined as follows: mi =g⟨S i⟩, C i,j =g 2⟨SiSj⟩i= 1, ...,12 ori=i1, ..., i4 (2) where⟨...⟩stands for thermal average and indexi1, ..., i4 points to the itinerant electrons and not to particular sites of the molecule. Local magnetizations in the IS FIG. 4. Local magnetizations and corelations atT= 2 K for molecule...

    work page

  2. [2]

    MoleculeI Due to the symmetry of the molecule there are gen- erally two nonequivalent directions of the electric field applied parallel to the ES: along sites 4 and 2 and along sites 1 and 2. In this section only the direction 4-2 will be considered in detail, as for this direction the impact of electric field on magnetism of moleculeImeasured by variatio...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Thus, one could expect the strongest magneto-electric effect for the field applied along sites 4 and 2

    MoleculeII MoleculeIIshould have similar anisotropy with re- spect to the electric field as moleculeI. Thus, one could expect the strongest magneto-electric effect for the field applied along sites 4 and 2. However, contrary toIno influence of the electric field (up to 20 V/nm) on mag- netic susceptibility and magnetisation has been found. The same concer...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The parameters obtained from the fitting at zero electric field are kept intact

    Molecule I The application of the electric field along sites 1 and 5 induces the change of the 1-4-1 distribution into 2-4- 0 (or 0-4-2). The parameters obtained from the fitting at zero electric field are kept intact. Two new parame- ters appear:ϵ 2, due to exchange transfer in one of the ES with two electrons and ∆E o which accounts for the change of th...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The parameters of the Hamiltonian obtained from fitting theE= 0 data are kept intact and new parameters ∆Eo and ∆E ′ o are added to account for the change of orbital energy

    Molecule II In the case of moleculeIIthe application of the electric field perpendicular to the ES leads to two abrupt changes in electron distribution from 2-4-2 to 3-4-1 (1-4-3) and then to 4-4-0 (0-4-4). The parameters of the Hamiltonian obtained from fitting theE= 0 data are kept intact and new parameters ∆Eo and ∆E ′ o are added to account for the ch...

    work page

  6. [6]

    be exploited in development of a temperature resistant method of molecular spin manipulation

    for moleculeI(circles) andII(squares) atE= 0. be exploited in development of a temperature resistant method of molecular spin manipulation. The change in electron spin correlations indicates that maybe also quantum entanglement of the electron spins can be manipulated with the electric field which can open the way to quantum computing applications. Furthe...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Molar susceptibility and magnetization have been cal- culated by numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian using libraries BLAS, LAPACK and ScaLAPACK

    of a compound, counter ions and solvant [NHEt3]2[NH2Me2][V12As8040(HC02)]·2H 2O for moleculeIand Na 5[V12As8040(HC02)]·18H 2O for moleculeII[27]. Molar susceptibility and magnetization have been cal- culated by numerical diagonalization of the Hamiltonian using libraries BLAS, LAPACK and ScaLAPACK. For fitting the experimental data an evolutionary algorit...

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    M. N. Leuenberger and D. Loss, Nature410, 789 (2001)

    work page 2001

  9. [9]

    Lehmann, A

    J. Lehmann, A. Gaita-Arino, E. Coronado, and D. Loss, Nat. Nanotechnol.2, 312 (2007)

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    G. A. Timco, S. Carretta, F. Troiani, F. Tuna, R. J. Pritchard, C. A. Muryn, E. J. L. McInnes, A. Ghirri, A. Candini, P. Santini, G. Amoretti, M. Affronte, and R. E. P. Winpenny, Nature Nano.4, 173 (2009)

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Chiesa, P

    A. Chiesa, P. Santini, E. Garlatti, F. Luis, and S. Car- retta, Reports on Progress in Physics87, 034501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Mannini, F

    M. Mannini, F. Pineider, P. Sainctavit, C. Danieli, E. Otero, C. Sciancalepore, A. M. Talarico, M.-A. Ar- rio, A. Cornia, D. Gatteschi, and R. Sessoli, Nat. Mater. 8, 194 (2009)

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    S. Hill, R. S. Edwards, N. Aliaga-Alcalde, and G. Chris- tou, Science302, 1015 (2003)

    work page 2003

  14. [14]

    Bogani and W

    L. Bogani and W. Wernsdorfer, Nature materials7, 179 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Urdampilleta, S

    M. Urdampilleta, S. Klyatskaya, J.-P. Cleuziou, M. Ruben, and W. Wernsdorfer, Nat. Mater.10, 502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Vincent, S

    R. Vincent, S. Klyatskaya, M. Ruben, W. Wernsdorfer, and F. Balestro, Nature488, 357 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    M. L. Baker, T. Guidi, S. Carretta, J. Ollivier, H. Mutka, H. U. G¨ udel, G. a. Timco, E. J. L. McInnes, G. Amoretti, R. E. P. Winpenny, and P. Santini, Nat. Phys.8, 906 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Thomas, F

    L. Thomas, F. Lionti, R. Ballou, D. Gatteschi, R. Sessoli, and B. Barbara, Nature383, 145 (1996)

    work page 1996

  19. [19]

    Mannini, F

    M. Mannini, F. Pineider, C. Danieli, F. Totti, L. Sorace, P. Sainctavit, M.-a. Arrio, E. Otero, L. Joly, J. C. Cezar, A. Cornia, and R. Sessoli, Nature468, 417 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Bertaina, S

    S. Bertaina, S. Gambarelli, T. Mitra, B. Tsukerblat, A. M¨ uller, and B. Barbara, Nature453, 203 (2008)

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Koz lowski, Physical Review B91, 174432 (2015)

    P. Koz lowski, Physical Review B91, 174432 (2015)

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Ardavan, O

    A. Ardavan, O. Rival, J. Morton, S. Blundell, A. Tyryshkin, G. Timco, and R. Winpenny, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 057201 (2007)

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    F. Moro, D. Kaminski, F. Tuna, G. F. S. Whitehead, G. a. Timco, D. Collison, R. E. P. Winpenny, A. Ardavan, and E. J. L. McInnes, Chem. Commun.50, 91 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Spin Polarized Transport Through a Single-Molecule Magnet: Current-Induced Magnetic Switching

    M. Misiorny and J. Barna´ s, Physical Review B - Con- densed Matter and Materials Physics76, 054448 (2007), arXiv:0706.2315

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    Misiorny and J

    M. Misiorny and J. Barna´ s, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials322, 1265 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Misiorny and J

    M. Misiorny and J. Barna´ s, Physical Review Letters111, 046603 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    M. Trif, F. Troiani, D. Stepanenko, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B82, 045429 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Y. X. Wang, D. Su, Y. Ma, Y. Sun, and P. Cheng, Nature Communications14, 7901 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    M. Trif, F. Troiani, D. Stepanenko, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 217201 (2008), arXiv:0805.1158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  30. [30]

    M. F. Islam, J. F. Nossa, C. M. Canali, and M. Pederson, Phys. Rev. B82, 155446 (2010), arXiv:1008.1139

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  31. [31]

    Troiani, Phys

    F. Troiani, Phys. Rev. B100, 155424 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    M. V. Vaganov, N. Suaud, F. Lambert, B. Cahier, C. Herrero, R. Guillot, A.-L. Barra, N. Guih´ ery, T. Mallah, A. Ardavan, and J. Liu, Nature Chemistry 10.1038/s41557-025-01926-5 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41557-025-01926-5 2025

  33. [33]

    J. F. Nossa, M. F. Islam, M. R. Pederson, and C. M. Canali, Physical Review B107, 245402 (2023), arXiv:2212.04066

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    M¨ uller, J

    A. M¨ uller, J. Doring, and H. Bogge, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Comun., , 273 (1991)

    work page 1991

  35. [35]

    M¨ uller, R

    A. M¨ uller, R. Sessoli, E. Krickemeyer, H. B¨ ogge, J. Meyer, D. Gatteschi, L. Pardi, J. Westphal, K. Hove- meier, R. Rohlfing, J. D¨ oring, F. Hellweg, C. Beugholt, and M. Schmidtmann, Inorg. Chem.36, 5239 (1997)

    work page 1997

  36. [36]

    T. D. Keene, D. M. Dalessandro, K. W. Kr¨ amer, J. R. Price, D. J. Price, S. Decurtins, and C. J. Kepert, Inorg. Chem.51, 9192 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    K. Y. Monakhov, W. Bensch, and K. Paul, Chem. Soc. Rev.44, 8443 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    K. Y. Monakhov, O. Linnenberg, P. Koz lowski, J. van Leusen, C. Besson, T. Secker, A. Ellern, X. L´ opez, J. M. Poblet, and P. K¨ ogerler, Chem. Eur. J.21, 2387 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Koz lowski, A

    P. Koz lowski, A. Notario-Est´ evez, C. de Graaf, X. L´ opez, and K. Y. Monakhov, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.19, 29767 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Notario-Est´ evez, P

    A. Notario-Est´ evez, P. Koz lowski, C. de Graaf, X. L´ opez, and K. Y. Monakhov, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20, 17847 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Cardona-Serra, J

    S. Cardona-Serra, J. M. Clemente-Juan, A. Gaita-Ari˜ no, N. Suaud, O. Svoboda, and E. Coronado, Chem. Com- mun.49, 9621 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    Cardona-Serra, J

    S. Cardona-Serra, J. M. Clemente-Juan, E. Coronado, A. Gaita-Ari˜ no, N. Suaud, O. Svoboda, R. Bastardis, N. Guih´ ery, and J. J. Palacios, Chem. Eur. J.21, 763 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Palii, S

    A. Palii, S. Aldoshin, B. Tsukerblat, J. Jose, J. Modesto Clemente-Juan, S. Cardona-Serra, and E. Coronado, In- org Chem56, 9547 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Bosch-Serrano, J

    C. Bosch-Serrano, J. M. Clemente-Juan, E. Coron- ado, A. Gaita-Ari˜ no, A. Palii, and B. Tsukerblat, ChemPhysChem13, 2662 (2012)

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Bosch-Serrano, J

    C. Bosch-Serrano, J. M. Clemente-Juan, E. Coronado, A. Gaita-Ari˜ no, A. Palii, and B. Tsukerblat, Phys. Rev. B86, 024432 (2012)

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    A. K. Boudalis, J. Robert, and P. Turek, Chem. Eur. J. 24, 14896 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    J. Liu, J. Mrozek, W. K. Myers, G. A. Timco, R. E. P. Winpenny, B. Kintzel, W. Plass, and A. Ardavan, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 037202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Lewkowitz, J

    M. Lewkowitz, J. Adams, N. S. Sullivan, P. Wang, M. Shatruk, V. Zapf, and A. S. Arvij, Scientific Reports 13, 2769 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    A. L. Barra, D. Gatteschi, B. S. Tsukerblatt, J. Doering, A. Mueller, and L. C. Brunel, Inorg. Chem.31, 5132 (1992)

    work page 1992

  50. [50]

    Procissi, A

    D. Procissi, A. Shastri, I. Rousochatzakis, M. Al Rifai, P. K¨ ogerler, M. Luban, B. Suh, and F. Borsa, Physical Review B69, 094436 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    Barbour, R

    A. Barbour, R. D. Luttrell, J. Choi, J. L. Musfeldt, D. Zipse, N. S. Dalal, D. W. Boukhvalov, V. V. Dobrovit- ski, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, B. N. Harmon, and P. K¨ ogerler, Phys. Rev. B74, 014411 (2006)

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Gatteschi, B

    D. Gatteschi, B. Tsukerblatt, A. L. Barra, and L. C. Brunel, Inorg. Chem.32, 2114 (1993)

    work page 1993

  53. [53]

    Gatteschi and B

    D. Gatteschi and B. Tsukerblat, Mol. Phys.79, 121 (1993)

    work page 1993

  54. [54]

    J¸ edrak,Real-space pairing in an extended t-J model, 15 Ph.D

    J. J¸ edrak,Real-space pairing in an extended t-J model, 15 Ph.D. thesis, Jagielonian University (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    E. E. Kaul,Experimental Investigation of New Low- Dimensional Spin Systems in Vanadium Oxides, Ph.D. thesis, Technical University Dresden (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    Suaud, X

    N. Suaud, X. L´ opez, N. Ben Amor, N. A. G. Bandeira, C. De Graaf, and J. M. Poblet, Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation11, 550 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    E. J. Baerends, N. F. Aguirre, N. D. Austin, J. Autschbach, F. M. Bickelhaupt, R. Bulo, C. Cap- pelli, A. C. T. van Duin, F. Egidi, C. Fonseca Guerra, A. F¨ orster, M. Franchini, T. P. M. Goumans, T. Heine, M. Hellstr¨ om, C. R. Jacob, L. Jensen, M. Krykunov, E. van Lenthe, A. Michalak, M. M. Mitoraj, J. Neuge- bauer, V. P. Nicu, P. Philipsen, H. Ramanant...

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Adf 2025.1, scm, theoretical chemistry, vrije universiteit, amsterdam, the netherlands, http://www.scm.com

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    van Lenthe and E

    E. van Lenthe and E. Baerends, Journal of Computa- tional Chemistry24, 1142 (2003)

    work page 2003

  60. [60]

    E. J. Baerends, D. E. Ellis, and P. Ros, Chem. Phys.2, 41 (1973)

    work page 1973

  61. [61]

    van Lenthe, E

    E. van Lenthe, E. J. Baerends, and J. Snijders, Journal of Chemical Physics99, 4597 (1993)

    work page 1993

  62. [62]

    van Lenthe, E

    E. van Lenthe, E. J. Baerends, and J. G. Snijders, Journal of Chemical Physics101, 9783 (1994)

    work page 1994

  63. [63]

    van Lenthe, A

    E. van Lenthe, A. E. Ehlers, and E. J. Baerends, Journal of Chemical Physics110, 8943 (1999)

    work page 1999

  64. [64]

    Swart and J

    M. Swart and J. G. Snijders, Theor. Chem. Acc110, 34 (2003)

    work page 2003

  65. [65]

    P. J. Stephens, F. J. Devlin, C. F. Chabalowski, and M. J. Frisch, Journal of Physical Chemistry98, 11623 (1994)

    work page 1994

  66. [66]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Anthony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, Journal of Chemical Physics132, 154104 (2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    C. C. Pye and T. Ziegler, Theoretical Chemistry Ac- counts101, 396 (1999)

    work page 1999

  68. [68]

    J. I. Rodr´ ıguez, R. F. W. Bader, P. W. Ayers, C. Michel, A. W. G¨ otz, and C. Bo, Chemical Physics Letters472, 149 (2009)

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    J. I. Rodr´ ıguez, Journal of Computational Chemistry34, 681 (2013)

    work page 2013

  70. [70]

    G. A. Bain and J. F. Berry, J. Chem. Educ.85, 532 (2008)

    work page 2008