pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.02274 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-01 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gravitational radiation from hyperbolic orbits: comparison between self-force, post-Minkowskian, post-Newtonian, and numerical relativity results

Niels Warburton
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords gravitational radiationhyperbolic orbitsself-forcepost-Minkowskianpost-NewtonianSchwarzschild black holenumerical relativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Self-force calculations of gravitational waves from hyperbolic black hole orbits agree with post-Minkowskian results up to velocities of 0.7c for large impact parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the gravitational wave energy emitted by a compact object on a hyperbolic or parabolic geodesic around a Schwarzschild black hole. It uses a frequency-domain method to solve the linearized perturbation equations. The computed radiated energy and absorbed energy match the latest post-Minkowskian expansions in the regime of large impact parameters and speeds reaching 70 percent of light speed. Further checks against post-Newtonian theory, a hybrid PN-PM model, and an initial numerical relativity comparison are presented.

Core claim

Using the frequency-domain Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli formalism applied to geodesic motion, the total energy radiated to infinity and the energy absorbed by the black hole are obtained for hyperbolic encounters. These self-force results agree with post-Minkowskian calculations for the radiated energy when the impact parameter is large and the asymptotic velocity reaches v_infinity/c = 0.7, and they also match the leading-order post-Minkowskian expression for the absorbed radiation.

What carries the argument

Frequency-domain Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli approach that solves the linearized Einstein equations for metric perturbations sourced by a geodesic particle in Schwarzschild spacetime.

If this is right

  • The agreement supports using self-force methods to model gravitational wave emission during strong-field scattering events.
  • Post-Minkowskian expansions remain accurate for hyperbolic flybys at velocities previously considered outside their expected range when the encounter is sufficiently distant.
  • A simple post-Newtonian plus post-Minkowskian hybrid captures the radiated energy across intermediate regimes.
  • Initial numerical relativity comparisons can now be used to benchmark extreme-mass-ratio results against comparable-mass simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same framework could be applied to test how finite-mass corrections alter the radiated energy once the small body is allowed to back-react.
  • Extending the comparison to spinning black holes would reveal whether the agreement persists when frame-dragging affects the trajectory.
  • These validated waveforms could serve as templates for detecting hyperbolic encounters in future gravitational-wave observatories.

Load-bearing premise

The compact object moves on a fixed geodesic trajectory without altering the background spacetime geometry.

What would settle it

A numerical self-force computation for a hyperbolic orbit with small impact parameter and v_infinity/c = 0.5 that deviates from the post-Minkowskian radiated-energy formula by more than a few percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.02274 by Niels Warburton.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Convergence of the weighting coefficient for the up [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Left panel) The spectrum of the total radiated energy for each value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of the total radiated energy from my [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Left panel) Comparison of the total radiated energy between SF and PM for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of the radiated energy to infinity with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Results for parabolic orbits ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work I use a frequency-domain Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli approach to compute the gravitational wave energy radiated by a compact body moving along a hyperbolic or parabolic geodesic of a Schwarzschild black hole. I compare my results with the latest post-Minkowskian (PM) calculations for the radiated energy and find agreement for hyperbolic orbits with large impact parameters and characterized by a velocity at infinity, $v_\infty$, as large as $v_\infty/c=0.7$. I also find agreement between my results and the leading-order PM expansion for the radiation absorbed by the black hole. I make further comparisons with post-Newtonian (PN) theory and show the effectiveness of a simple PN-PM hybrid model. Finally, I make a first comparison of the radiated energy between self-force and numerical relativity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the energy radiated in gravitational waves by a compact object on hyperbolic or parabolic geodesics in a fixed Schwarzschild background using the frequency-domain Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli formalism. Results for the radiated energy are compared to recent post-Minkowskian calculations, showing agreement at large impact parameters for velocities at infinity up to v_∞/c = 0.7; leading-order post-Minkowskian absorption by the black hole is also compared. Additional comparisons are presented with post-Newtonian expansions, a simple PN-PM hybrid, and a preliminary numerical-relativity result.

Significance. If the reported agreements hold under detailed scrutiny, the work supplies a useful cross-check of the self-force approach against independent PM and NR calculations in the extreme-mass-ratio, large-separation regime. The extension of the PM comparison to v_∞/c = 0.7 and the explicit absorption test are concrete strengths that help anchor the method for hyperbolic encounters.

major comments (1)
  1. [§2] The central comparisons rest on the geodesic approximation in a fixed background. While appropriate for the extreme-mass-ratio limit, the manuscript should quantify the expected size of the leading self-force correction to the trajectory for the impact parameters and velocities considered, to bound the domain of validity of the reported agreements.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§5] Figure captions and the text around the NR comparison should explicitly state the mass ratio, resolution, and extraction radius used, so that the scope of the 'first comparison' is clear.
  2. [§4] The hybrid PN-PM model is introduced without a dedicated equation; adding an explicit formula for the matching procedure would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive recommendation of minor revision. The referee's comment is constructive and we address it directly below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central comparisons rest on the geodesic approximation in a fixed background. While appropriate for the extreme-mass-ratio limit, the manuscript should quantify the expected size of the leading self-force correction to the trajectory for the impact parameters and velocities considered, to bound the domain of validity of the reported agreements.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit estimate of the leading self-force correction would strengthen the presentation and help bound the domain of validity. In the extreme-mass-ratio limit the correction to the four-velocity scales as O(μ/M). For the large impact parameters (b/M ≳ 10) and velocities up to v_∞/c = 0.7 that enter our PM comparisons, this implies a fractional correction to the radiated energy well below the few-percent level at which we observe agreement with the PM results. We will revise the manuscript by adding a short paragraph (most naturally in §2) that supplies this order-of-magnitude estimate together with the relevant scaling arguments from the self-force literature on hyperbolic encounters. This addition will make the domain of validity of the geodesic approximation explicit without requiring new numerical work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained against external benchmarks

full rationale

The central computation uses the frequency-domain Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli formalism to obtain radiated energy for hyperbolic and parabolic geodesics in a fixed Schwarzschild background. This is the standard defining setup of the extreme-mass-ratio self-force framework and is not derived from or fitted to the PM, PN, or NR quantities being compared. Agreements are reported only in the expected overlap regimes (large impact parameter, v_∞/c up to 0.7) with independent external calculations; the leading-order PM absorption comparison is likewise external. No self-citation chain, fitted input renamed as prediction, ansatz smuggled via citation, or uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the reported results. The geodesic assumption is an input approximation appropriate to the limit, not a circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard assumptions of black-hole perturbation theory in general relativity and the test-particle geodesic limit; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The small compact body follows a geodesic of the fixed Schwarzschild spacetime
    Invoked to define the orbit for the perturbation calculation.
  • standard math Linearized gravitational perturbations on a Schwarzschild background obey the Regge-Wheeler-Zerilli equations
    Standard result of black-hole perturbation theory used throughout.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5443 in / 1428 out tokens · 39850 ms · 2026-05-17T02:07:37.325089+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Runway to Dissipation of Angular Momentum via Worldline Quantum Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce static correlators in worldline QFT to compute angular momentum dissipation in black hole scattering, reproducing the known O(G^3) flux and extending the approach to electromagnetism at O(α^3).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    I define the angular momentum of each body about the CoM viaL ∗ i =r ∗ i ×p ∗ i , wherer ∗ i is a radial three-vector connecting the body and the CoM

    The four momen- tum is related to the three-velocityv ∗ i viap ∗ i =γ ∗ i miv∗ i whereγ ∗ i = 1/ p 1−(v ∗ i )2 is the Lorentz factor with v∗ i =|v ∗ i |. I define the angular momentum of each body about the CoM viaL ∗ i =r ∗ i ×p ∗ i , wherer ∗ i is a radial three-vector connecting the body and the CoM. This gives the magnitude of the angular momentum as ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The 1PN result was com- puted by Blanchet and Sch¨ afer [29] and the 2PN result was derived by Bini et al

    (corrected by Turner [76]). The 1PN result was com- puted by Blanchet and Sch¨ afer [29] and the 2PN result was derived by Bini et al. [30] — see their Appendix D for the form that matches Eq. (10). One often explored limit of these results is theer → ∞, or bremsstrahlung, limit which is equivalent to the large jlimit. In this limit the radiated energy ca...

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Energy radiated to infinity In the PM expansion the energy radiated to infinity takes the form ∆EPM ∞ = M4ν2 Γ(ν, γ) E3PM(γ) b3 + E4PM(γ, ν) b4 + E5PM(γ, ν) b5 +O(b −6) .(13) The functionE 3PM(γ) was first computed in Ref. [32]. The 4PM term,E 4PM(γ, ν) was computed in Ref. [33, 34]. The 5PM function is only known at leading order in the mass ratio, that ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    It enters at 7PM order and is given by ∆EPM H = 5πm6 1m2 2 16b7 (21γ4 −14γ 2 + 1) p γ2 −1 +O(b −8)

    Energy radiated through the horizon The leading-order horizon flux was calculated in [35, 36]. It enters at 7PM order and is given by ∆EPM H = 5πm6 1m2 2 16b7 (21γ4 −14γ 2 + 1) p γ2 −1 +O(b −8). (14)

    work page

  5. [5]

    Radiated angular momentum and the dissipative scattering angle Although not the focus of the present work, for com- pletness I note that the 2PM and 3PM radiated angular momentum for non-spinning binaries can be found in [80] and [81, 82], respectively. Refs. [39, 83] present the PN- expanded 4PM result. To the best of my knowledge no one has computed the...

    work page

  6. [6]

    higher-order master function

    one can derive the flux of energy and angular mo- mentum. Upon integrating along the scattered orbit the total radiated energy and angular momentum is given by [92] ∆E∞ = X ℓm Z ∞ −∞ 1 64π (l+ 2)! (l−2)! | ˙Ψℓm|2 du,(42) ∆L∞ = X ℓm Z ∞ −∞ im 64π (l+ 2)! (l−2)! ˙Ψℓm ¯Ψℓm du,(43) whereu=t−r ∗ withr ∗ =r+ 2Mlog(r/2M−1) as the tortoise coordinate, an overdot ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    The outer boundary location,r out, is ad- justed to ensure that the boundary is in the wave- zone where the boundary condition expansion will converge

    I compute the numerical boundary conditions for X+ ℓmω(r) atr=r out, and similarly forX − ℓmω(r) at r=r in. The outer boundary location,r out, is ad- justed to ensure that the boundary is in the wave- zone where the boundary condition expansion will converge. For the inner boundary location I find it is always sufficient to setr in/m1 = 2 + 10−5

    work page

  8. [8]

    (64) from the numerical boundary conditions tor=r min

    I numerically integrate the homogeneous version of Eq. (64) from the numerical boundary conditions tor=r min. The integration is carried out using Mathematica’sNDSolvefunction and I store the values of ˆX ± ℓmω and their radial derivatives atr= rmin

    work page

  9. [9]

    Zoom-Whirl

    In Sec. III I have parameterized the orbital motion by the Darwin parameter,χ, and thus it is useful to change the integration variable in the source re- gion to fromrtoχby using Eq. (29) to compute drp/dχ. Similarly, I change the integration variable fromttoχin Eq. (59) usingdt/dχfrom Eq. (38). By defining ˆY ± ℓmω ≡d ˆX ±/drI write the field equa- tion ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Note for parabolic orbits the (b, v∞) is not defined asb→ ∞as the parabolic limit is approached

    and 3PN order [31]. Note for parabolic orbits the (b, v∞) is not defined asb→ ∞as the parabolic limit is approached. Instead I parametrize the orbit with (p, e), or alternatively (E,L). The results of the PN-SF com- parison for parabolic orbits are shown in Fig. 8 where the numerical data and the PN series are found to be in agreement for large values ofp...

    work page 1993

  11. [11]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Tran- sient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run, (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    C. P. L. Berry and J. R. Gair, Observing the Galaxy’s massive black hole with gravitational wave bursts, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.429, 589 (2013), arXiv:1210.2778 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    D. J. Oliver, A. D. Johnson, J. Berrier, K. Glampedakis, and D. Kennefick, Gravitational wave peeps from EMRIs and their implication for LISA signal confu- sion noise, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 115004 (2024), arXiv:2305.05793 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Henshaw, J

    C. Henshaw, J. Lange, P. Lott, R. O’Shaughnessy, and L. Cadonati, Parameter estimation of gravitational waves from hyperbolic black hole encounters, (2025), arXiv:2507.01156 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Effective one-body ap- proach to general relativistic two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Pompiliet al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved ac- curacy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing bi- nary black holes, Phys

    L. Pompiliet al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved ac- curacy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing bi- nary black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124035 (2023), arXiv:2303.18039 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Riemenschneider, P

    G. Riemenschneider, P. Rettegno, M. Breschi, A. Al- bertini, R. Gamba, S. Bernuzzi, and A. Nagar, Assess- ment of consistent next-to-quasicircular corrections and postadiabatic approximation in effective-one-body mul- tipolar waveforms for binary black hole coalescences, Phys. Rev. D104, 104045 (2021), arXiv:2104.07533 [gr- 15 qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simulations with post-Newtonian expansions

    M. Boyle, D. A. Brown, L. E. Kidder, A. H. Mroue, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, G. B. Cook, and S. A. Teukolsky, High-accuracy comparison of numerical relativity simu- lations with post-Newtonian expansions, Phys. Rev. D 76, 124038 (2007), arXiv:0710.0158 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Comparison between numerical-relativity and post-Newtonian waveforms from spinning binaries: the orbital hang-up case

    M. Hannam, S. Husa, B. Bruegmann, and A. Gopaku- mar, Comparison between numerical-relativity and post-Newtonian waveforms from spinning binaries: The Orbital hang-up case, Phys. Rev. D78, 104007 (2008), arXiv:0712.3787 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    S. L. Detweiler, A Consequence of the gravitational self- force for circular orbits of the Schwarzschild geometry, Phys. Rev. D77, 124026 (2008), arXiv:0804.3529 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    Post-Newtonian and Numerical Calculations of the Gravitational Self-Force for Circular Orbits in the Schwarzschild Geometry

    L. Blanchet, S. L. Detweiler, A. Le Tiec, and B. F. Whiting, Post-Newtonian and Numerical Calculations of the Gravitational Self-Force for Circular Orbits in the Schwarzschild Geometry, Phys. Rev. D81, 064004 (2010), arXiv:0910.0207 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [22]

    Conservative self-force correction to the innermost stable circular orbit: comparison with multiple post-Newtonian-based methods

    M. Favata, Conservative self-force correction to the in- nermost stable circular orbit: comparison with multi- ple post-Newtonian-based methods, Phys. Rev. D83, 024027 (2011), arXiv:1008.4622 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    Periastron Advance in Black-Hole Binaries

    A. Le Tiec, A. H. Mroue, L. Barack, A. Buonanno, H. P. Pfeiffer, N. Sago, and A. Taracchini, Periastron Advance in Black Hole Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 141101 (2011), arXiv:1106.3278 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    S. R. Dolan, N. Warburton, A. I. Harte, A. Le Tiec, B. Wardell, and L. Barack, Gravitational self-torque and spin precession in compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D89, 064011 (2014), arXiv:1312.0775 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    The Overlap of Numerical Relativity, Perturbation Theory and Post-Newtonian Theory in the Binary Black Hole Problem

    A. Le Tiec, The Overlap of Numerical Relativity, Per- turbation Theory and Post-Newtonian Theory in the Binary Black Hole Problem, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23, 1430022 (2014), arXiv:1408.5505 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    S. R. Dolan, P. Nolan, A. C. Ottewill, N. Warburton, and B. Wardell, Tidal invariants for compact binaries on quasicircular orbits, Phys. Rev. D91, 023009 (2015), arXiv:1406.4890 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Comparison Between Self-Force and Post-Newtonian Dynamics: Beyond Circular Orbits

    S. Akcay, A. Le Tiec, L. Barack, N. Sago, and N. Warburton, Comparison Between Self-Force and Post-Newtonian Dynamics: Beyond Circular Orbits, Phys. Rev. D91, 124014 (2015), arXiv:1503.01374 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Antonelli, M

    A. Antonelli, M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, J. Stein- hoff, and J. Vines, Quasicircular inspirals and plunges from nonspinning effective-one-body Hamiltonians with gravitational self-force information, Phys. Rev. D101, 024024 (2020), arXiv:1907.11597 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Energetics of two-body Hamiltonians in post-Minkowskian gravity

    A. Antonelli, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. van de Meent, and J. Vines, Energetics of two-body Hamilto- nians in post-Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D99, 104004 (2019), arXiv:1901.07102 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Borhanian, K

    S. Borhanian, K. G. Arun, H. P. Pfeiffer, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Comparison of post-Newtonian mode amplitudes with numerical relativity simulations of bi- nary black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 065006 (2020), arXiv:1901.08516 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    van de Meent, A

    M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, D. P. Mihaylov, S. Ossokine, L. Pompili, N. Warburton, A. Pound, B. Wardell, L. Durkan, and J. Miller, Enhancing the SEOBNRv5 effective-one-body waveform model with second-order gravitational self-force fluxes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124038 (2023), arXiv:2303.18026 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Leather, A

    B. Leather, A. Buonanno, and M. van de Meent, Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms with gravitational self-force results within the effective-one-body formal- ism, Phys. Rev. D112, 044012 (2025), arXiv:2505.11242 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory

    T. Damour, Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory, Phys. Rev. D94, 104015 (2016), arXiv:1609.00354 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem

    T. Damour, High-energy gravitational scattering and the general relativistic two-body problem, Phys. Rev. D97, 044038 (2018), arXiv:1710.10599 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, The SAGEX review on scattering ampli- tudes Chapter 13: Post-Minkowskian expansion from scattering amplitudes, J. Phys. A55, 443014 (2022), arXiv:2203.13024 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    D. A. Kosower, R. Monteiro, and D. O’Connell, The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 14: Classical gravity from scattering amplitudes, J. Phys. A55, 443015 (2022), arXiv:2203.13025 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Buonanno, M

    A. Buonanno, M. Khalil, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Snowmass White Paper: Gravitational Waves and Scattering Amplitudes, in Snowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2204.05194 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Uso- vitsch, Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high- precision black-hole scattering, Nature641, 603 (2025), arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Blanchet and G

    L. Blanchet and G. Schaefer, Higher order grav- itational radiation losses in binary systems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.239, 845 (1989), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 242, 704 (1990)]

    work page 1989

  40. [40]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Sixth post-Newtonian nonlocal-in-time dynamics of bi- nary systems, Phys. Rev. D102, 084047 (2020), arXiv:2007.11239 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Cho, Third post-Newtonian gravitational radia- tion from two-body scattering

    G. Cho, Third post-Newtonian gravitational radia- tion from two-body scattering. II. Hereditary en- ergy radiation, Phys. Rev. D105, 104035 (2022), arXiv:2203.10872 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from Re- verse Unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 201602 (2021), arXiv:2101.07255 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  43. [43]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 101401 (2023), arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Plant´ e, and P. Van- hove, Classical observables from the exponential repre- sentation of the gravitational S-matrix, JHEP09, 183, arXiv:2307.04746 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Horizon radiation reaction forces, JHEP10, 026, arXiv:2007.00731 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2007

  46. [46]

    C. R. T. Jones and M. S. Ruf, Absorptive effects and classical black hole scattering, JHEP03, 015, arXiv:2310.00069 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    G. Cho, S. Dandapat, and A. Gopakumar, Third or- der post-Newtonian gravitational radiation from two- body scattering: Instantaneous energy and angular mo- mentum radiation, Phys. Rev. D105, 084018 (2022), 16 arXiv:2111.00818 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    D. Bini, A. Geralico, C. Kavanagh, A. Pound, and D. Usseglio, Post-Minkowskian self-force in the low- velocity limit: Scalar field scattering, Phys. Rev. D110, 064050 (2024), arXiv:2406.15878 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Geralico, Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: radiated energy and angular momentum, (2025), arXiv:2507.03442 [gr-qc]

    A. Geralico, Scattering of a point mass by a Schwarzschild black hole: radiated energy and angular momentum, (2025), arXiv:2507.03442 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, From Boundary Data to Bound States, JHEP01, 072, arXiv:1910.03008 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 1910

  51. [51]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynamical invariants (with twist), JHEP02, 120, arXiv:1911.09130 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1911

  52. [52]

    G. Cho, G. K¨ alin, and R. A. Porto, From boundary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects, JHEP04, 154, [Erratum: JHEP 07, 002 (2022)], arXiv:2112.03976 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Adamo, R

    T. Adamo, R. Gonzo, and A. Ilderton, Gravitational bound waveforms from amplitudes, JHEP05, 034, arXiv:2402.00124 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Khalil, A

    M. Khalil, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and J. Vines, En- ergetics and scattering of gravitational two-body sys- tems at fourth post-Minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024042 (2022), arXiv:2204.05047 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Buonanno, G

    A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakobsen, and G. Mogull, Post- Minkowskian theory meets the spinning effective-one- body approach for two-body scattering, Phys. Rev. D 110, 044038 (2024), arXiv:2402.12342 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Strong-Field Scattering of Two Black Holes: Numerics Versus Analytics

    T. Damour, F. Guercilena, I. Hinder, S. Hopper, A. Na- gar, and L. Rezzolla, Strong-Field Scattering of Two Black Holes: Numerics Versus Analytics, Phys. Rev. D 89, 081503 (2014), arXiv:1402.7307 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    Rettegno, G

    P. Rettegno, G. Pratten, L. M. Thomas, P. Schmidt, and T. Damour, Strong-field scattering of two spin- ning black holes: Numerical relativity versus post- Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D108, 124016 (2023), arXiv:2307.06999 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    O. Long, H. P. Pfeiffer, L. E. Kidder, and M. A. Scheel, Black-hole scattering with numerical relativity: Self-force extraction and post-Minkowskian validation, (2025), arXiv:2511.10196 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    O. Long, H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Buonanno, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, A. Ramos-Buades, H. R. R¨ uter, L. E. Kid- der, and M. A. Scheel, Highly accurate simulations of asymmetric black-hole scattering and cross validation of effective-one-body models, (2025), arXiv:2507.08071 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  60. [60]

    Clark and G

    A. Clark and G. Pratten, Strong Field Scattering of Two Black Holes: Exploring Gauge Flexibility, (2025), arXiv:2508.12126 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Spin-up and mass-gain in hyperbolic encounters of spinning black holes

    H. Kogan, F. C. L. Pardoe, and H. Witek, Spin-up and mass-gain in hyperbolic encounters of spinning black holes, (2025), arXiv:2511.00307 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Kankani and S

    A. Kankani and S. T. McWilliams, Testing the boundary-to-bound correspondence with numeri- cal relativity, Phys. Rev. D110, 064033 (2024), arXiv:2404.03607 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Swain, G

    S. Swain, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Strong field scat- tering of black holes: Assessing resummation strategies, Phys. Rev. D111, 064048 (2025), arXiv:2411.09652 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Fontbut´ e, T

    J. Fontbut´ e, T. Andrade, R. Luna, J. Calder´ on Bustillo, G. Morr´ as, S. Jaraba, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, and G. L. Izquierdo, Numerical-relativity surrogate model for hy- perbolic encounters of black holes: Challenges in pa- rameter estimation, Phys. Rev. D111, 044024 (2025), arXiv:2409.16742 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    P. A. Sundararajan, G. Khanna, and S. A. Hughes, To- wards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes. I. A New model of the source for the time domain perturbation equation, Phys. Rev. D76, 104005 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0703028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  66. [66]

    P. A. Sundararajan, G. Khanna, S. A. Hughes, and S. Drasco, Towards adiabatic waveforms for inspiral into Kerr black holes: II. Dynamical sources and generic or- bits, Phys. Rev. D78, 024022 (2008), arXiv:0803.0317 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [67]

    S. E. Field, S. Gottlieb, Z. J. Grant, L. F. Isherwood, and G. Khanna, A GPU-accelerated mixed-precision WENO method for extremal black hole and gravita- tional wave physics computations, Appl. Math. Com- put.5, 97 (2023), arXiv:2010.04760 [math.NA]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    A new gravitational wave generation algorithm for particle perturbations of the Kerr spacetime

    E. Harms, S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, and A. Zenginoglu, A new gravitational wave generation algorithm for parti- cle perturbations of the Kerr spacetime, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 245004 (2014), arXiv:1406.5983 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  69. [69]

    Numerical solution of the 2+1 Teukolsky equation on a hyperboloidal and horizon penetrating foliation of Kerr and application to late-time decays

    E. Harms, S. Bernuzzi, and B. Br¨ ugmann, Numerical so- lution of the 2+1 Teukolsky equation on a hyperboloidal and horizon penetrating foliation of Kerr and applica- tion to late-time decays, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 115013 (2013), arXiv:1301.1591 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  70. [70]

    Placidi, S

    A. Placidi, S. Albanesi, A. Nagar, M. Orselli, S. Bernuzzi, and G. Grignani, Exploiting Newton- factorized, 2PN-accurate waveform multipoles in effective-one-body models for spin-aligned noncircu- larized binaries, Phys. Rev. D105, 104030 (2022), arXiv:2112.05448 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Albanesi, A

    S. Albanesi, A. Nagar, and S. Bernuzzi, Effective one- body model for extreme-mass-ratio spinning binaries on eccentric equatorial orbits: Testing radiation reac- tion and waveform, Phys. Rev. D104, 024067 (2021), arXiv:2104.10559 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Albanesi, A

    S. Albanesi, A. Nagar, S. Bernuzzi, A. Placidi, and M. Orselli, Assessment of effective-one-body radiation reactions for generic planar orbits, Phys. Rev. D105, 104031 (2022), arXiv:2202.10063 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Faggioli, M

    G. Faggioli, M. van de Meent, A. Buonanno, A. Gam- boa, M. Khalil, and G. Khanna, Testing eccentric cor- rections to the radiation-reaction force in the test-mass limit of effective-one-body models, Phys. Rev. D111, 044036 (2025), arXiv:2405.19006 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Gravitational waveforms from a point particle orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole

    K. Martel, Gravitational wave forms from a point par- ticle orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 69, 044025 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  75. [75]

    Unbound motion on a Schwarzschild background: Practical approaches to frequency domain computations

    S. Hopper, Unbound motion on a Schwarzschild background: Practical approaches to frequency do- main computations, Phys. Rev. D97, 064007 (2018), arXiv:1706.05455 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Scattering of point particles by black holes: gravitational radiation

    S. Hopper and V. Cardoso, Scattering of point particles by black holes: gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D 97, 044031 (2018), arXiv:1706.02791 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Semianalytical estimates of scattering thresholds and gravitational radiation in ultrarelativistic black hole encounters

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, T. Hinderer, M. Lemos, F. Pre- torius, U. Sperhake, and N. Yunes, Semianalytical es- timates of scattering thresholds and gravitational ra- diation in ultrarelativistic black hole encounters, Phys. Rev. D81, 104048 (2010), arXiv:1003.0812 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  78. [78]

    Y. Yin, R. K. L. Lo, and X. Chen, Gravitational radi- 17 ation from Kerr black holes using the Sasaki-Nakamura formalism: waveforms and fluxes at infinity, (2025), arXiv:2511.08673 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell, Black hole perturbation theory and gravitational self-force 10.1007/978-981-15- 4702-7 38-1 (2021), arXiv:2101.04592 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-15- 2021

  80. [80]

    Barack and O

    L. Barack and O. Long, Self-force correction to the deflection angle in black-hole scattering: A scalar charge toy model, Phys. Rev. D106, 104031 (2022), arXiv:2209.03740 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.