arxiv: 2512.05495 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-05 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.SY· eess.SY

Temporal Reach-Avoid-Stay Control for Differential Drive Systems via Spatiotemporal Tubes

Ratnangshu Das , Ahan Basu , Christos Verginis , Pushpak Jagtap This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY

keywords temporal specificationsspatiotemporal tubesdifferential drivereach-avoid-stayrobust controlsampling-based planningmobile robots

0 comments

The pith

Circular spatiotemporal tubes enable robust satisfaction of temporal reach-avoid-stay specifications for differential-drive robots.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper aims to create a lightweight control system for wheeled robots that must arrive at a goal within time limits, dodge obstacles, and stay in safe zones even when their movement is unpredictable due to errors or outside forces. It models the safe space as round areas that move and resize over time to form a corridor. A random sampling method builds a corridor that meets the time and safety needs with proofs, then a direct math formula generates the wheel speeds to keep the robot on track inside it. If successful, this gives robots reliable timed navigation without needing lots of processing power or perfect models.

Core claim

The authors establish that a sampling-based algorithm can construct circular spatiotemporal tubes meeting timing and safety constraints with formal guarantees, and that a closed-form control law can be analytically designed to ensure the differential-drive robot remains confined within the tube despite uncertainties and disturbances, thereby satisfying the T-RAS specifications.

What carries the argument

Circular spatiotemporal tubes with smoothly time-varying centers and radii that act as dynamic safe corridors, synthesized by sampling and enforced via analytical closed-form control.

If this is right

The sampling-based synthesis provides formal guarantees on tube feasibility.
The closed-form control is computationally efficient for real-time use.
The framework is robust to dynamic uncertainties and external disturbances.
Simulations show better performance than state-of-the-art methods in robustness and efficiency.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This approach may generalize to other nonholonomic robot models beyond differential drive.
The tube concept could be combined with higher-level planners for multi-robot coordination.
Testing in physical hardware would reveal practical limits of the robustness claims.

Load-bearing premise

A feasible spatiotemporal tube satisfying the timing and safety constraints can always be found using the sampling-based algorithm, and the closed-form control will keep the robot confined within the tube under modeled uncertainties and disturbances.

What would settle it

Observing a case where the sampling algorithm fails to produce a feasible tube for a satisfiable specification, or where the robot leaves the tube and violates a reach, avoid, or stay condition during execution of the closed-form controller.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.05495 by Ahan Basu, Christos Verginis, Pushpak Jagtap, Ratnangshu Das.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Robot inside circular STT 4 Controller Synthesis This section presents the proposed approximation-free, closed-form control design procedure. Given the circular spatiotemporal tube (STT) Γ(t) = B(c(t),r(t)) obtained as discussed in Section 3, we define the distance error ed and the orientation error eθ: ed(t, x) = ∥x(t) − c(t)∥ r(t) , eθ(t, ξ) = Ψ ed(t, x) ed 2 π tan−1 c2(t) − x2(t) c1(t) − x1(t) … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The constructed STT and the corresponding vehicle trajectory navigating through an office space. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The constructed STT and the corresponding vehicle trajectory in a dynamic environment with time-varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Comparison with existing approaches 5.1 Navigation in a Cluttered Office-Like Environment In the first scenario, the robot navigates through a cluttered office-like environment with multiple static obstacles. The task is defined as a sequence of T-RAS objectives with given start, target, and unsafe regions, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This paper presents a computationally lightweight and robust control framework for differential-drive mobile robots with dynamic uncertainties and external disturbances, guaranteeing the satisfaction of Temporal Reach-Avoid-Stay (T-RAS) specifications. The approach employs circular spatiotemporal tubes (STTs), characterized by smoothly time-varying center and radius, to define dynamic safe corridors that guide the robot from the start region to the goal while avoiding obstacles. In particular, we first develop a sampling-based synthesis algorithm to construct a feasible STT that satisfies the prescribed timing and safety constraints with formal guarantees. To ensure that the robot remains confined within this tube, we then analytically design a closed-form control that is computationally efficient and robust to disturbances. The proposed framework is validated through simulation studies on a differential-drive robot and benchmarked against state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating superior robustness, accuracy, and computational efficiency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Sampling-based circular tube synthesis for T-RAS on differential-drive robots is a practical step but the completeness of the sampler under nonholonomic constraints is the part that needs checking.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that the paper gives a sampling procedure to build time-varying circular spatiotemporal tubes that satisfy Temporal Reach-Avoid-Stay specs, then hands the robot an analytic controller that keeps it inside the tube under disturbances and model error. The controller is closed-form, which keeps the online cost low, and the simulations show it beating some existing methods on robustness and speed for the tested scenarios. That combination of sampling for the tube plus analytic confinement for differential-drive kinematics is the concrete contribution. It takes ideas from reach-avoid and tube-based control and applies them to timed specifications without requiring heavy optimization at runtime. The validation is limited to simulation but includes direct comparisons, so there is at least some evidence the approach works on the examples they ran. The soft spot is the sampling step itself. The claim is that the algorithm produces a feasible tube with formal guarantees, yet differential-drive kinematics restrict the reachable set in space-time because of turning radius and orientation coupling. Standard sampling over position and time can miss valid tubes or fail to find one even when it exists, unless the procedure explicitly accounts for the nonholonomic reachable set or includes a completeness argument. The abstract does not make that argument explicit, so the formal side rests on an assumption that may need more support in the full text. This paper is aimed at robotics control people who need implementable timed safety for ground robots rather than a broad theoretical advance. A reader working on real-time navigation filters or safety-critical mobile systems would get usable pieces from the controller design and the benchmark numbers. It is solid enough on the practical side and has enough of a method to send for peer review, though a referee should press on whether the synthesis is complete or only empirically successful.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a control framework for differential-drive robots satisfying Temporal Reach-Avoid-Stay (T-RAS) specifications. It uses circular spatiotemporal tubes (STTs) with time-varying centers and radii as dynamic safe corridors. A sampling-based synthesis algorithm constructs feasible STTs meeting timing and safety constraints with claimed formal guarantees; a closed-form control law then confines the robot to the tube while remaining computationally efficient and robust to disturbances and uncertainties. Validation occurs via simulations benchmarked against prior methods.

Significance. If the synthesis guarantees and confinement properties hold, the framework offers a lightweight, analytically tractable alternative to optimization-based or learning-based methods for enforcing timed reach-avoid-stay tasks on nonholonomic platforms under bounded disturbances. The combination of sampling for tube construction and closed-form control could improve real-time deployability in robotics applications.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (Sampling-based STT Synthesis): The claim that the algorithm constructs a feasible circular STT satisfying both safety (obstacle avoidance) and timing (reach-avoid-stay) constraints with formal guarantees is load-bearing for the entire framework. For differential-drive kinematics the feasible set is strictly smaller than the geometric corridor due to turning-radius and orientation coupling; standard position-time sampling does not automatically respect the nonholonomic reachable set. No explicit completeness argument, dense sampling schedule, or reachable-set-aware discretization is referenced, so the guarantee that a feasible tube is always found (when one exists) remains unsubstantiated.
[§4] §4 (Closed-form Control Design): The analytic control law is asserted to keep the robot inside the tube under modeled uncertainties. The proof sketch relies on a specific Lyapunov or barrier function whose derivative bound must hold for the chosen tube radius schedule; without an explicit disturbance bound or the precise inequality relating tube radius, control gain, and maximum disturbance (e.g., Eq. (12) or its counterpart), robustness cannot be verified from the given description.

minor comments (2)

[§2] Notation for the time-varying radius function r(t) is introduced without a clear statement of its smoothness class (C^1 or C^2) required for the subsequent derivative bounds.
[§5] Simulation figures would benefit from explicit overlay of the synthesized tube boundary and the actual robot trajectory under disturbance to visually confirm confinement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the insightful comments and the recommendation for major revision. We provide detailed responses to each major comment and outline the changes we will implement in the revised manuscript to address the concerns regarding formal guarantees.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §3 (Sampling-based STT Synthesis): The claim that the algorithm constructs a feasible circular STT satisfying both safety (obstacle avoidance) and timing (reach-avoid-stay) constraints with formal guarantees is load-bearing for the entire framework. For differential-drive kinematics the feasible set is strictly smaller than the geometric corridor due to turning-radius and orientation coupling; standard position-time sampling does not automatically respect the nonholonomic reachable set. No explicit completeness argument, dense sampling schedule, or reachable-set-aware discretization is referenced, so the guarantee that a feasible tube is always found (when one exists) remains unsubstantiated.

Authors: We agree with the referee that the nonholonomic constraints of differential-drive robots must be explicitly accounted for to substantiate the formal guarantees of the sampling-based STT synthesis. Our current algorithm ensures geometric feasibility of the circular tubes with respect to obstacles and timing. To strengthen this, we will revise §3 to incorporate a reachable-set-aware discretization by including checks for feasible orientation transitions and minimum turning radii during sampling. Additionally, we will provide a completeness argument showing that with sufficiently dense sampling in the (x, y, t) space, combined with the robustness of the subsequent control law, a kinematically feasible tube can be found whenever one exists. A new proposition will be added to formalize this. revision: yes
Referee: §4 (Closed-form Control Design): The analytic control law is asserted to keep the robot inside the tube under modeled uncertainties. The proof sketch relies on a specific Lyapunov or barrier function whose derivative bound must hold for the chosen tube radius schedule; without an explicit disturbance bound or the precise inequality relating tube radius, control gain, and maximum disturbance (e.g., Eq. (12) or its counterpart), robustness cannot be verified from the given description.

Authors: We acknowledge that the robustness analysis in §4 would benefit from more explicit conditions. The closed-form control law uses a feedback term with gain k to drive the robot towards the tube center, and the proof shows that the error dynamics satisfy a bound involving the disturbance magnitude. In the revision, we will explicitly derive and state the condition that the time-varying tube radius r(t) must satisfy r(t) >= d_max / k + delta, where d_max is the bound on disturbances and uncertainties, and delta is a positive margin. This inequality will be added to the main result in §4, ensuring that the confinement property holds under the modeled uncertainties. We will also clarify the Lyapunov function used and its derivative bound. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: synthesis algorithm and control law derived independently from constraints

full rationale

The paper develops a sampling-based synthesis algorithm to construct feasible STTs satisfying timing and safety constraints, followed by an analytical closed-form control design to keep the robot inside the tube. These steps are presented as constructed from the T-RAS specifications, differential-drive kinematics, and disturbance bounds rather than reducing to self-definitions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation chains. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated assumptions and formal guarantees.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only view supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the approach implicitly assumes existence of feasible tubes and robustness of the control law but does not detail them.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5459 in / 1136 out tokens · 92597 ms · 2026-05-17T01:43:40.180384+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[1]

Giuseppe Fragapane, Dmitry Ivanov, Mirco Peron, Fabio Sgarbossa, and Jan Ola Strandhagen. Increasing flexibility and productivity in industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics.Annals of operations research, 308(1):125–143, 2022

work page 2022
[2]

Fuzzy extended vikor-based mobile robot selection model for hospital pharmacy.International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 15(4):1729881418787315, 2018

Fuli Zhou, Xu Wang, and Mark Goh. Fuzzy extended vikor-based mobile robot selection model for hospital pharmacy.International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 15(4):1729881418787315, 2018

work page 2018
[3]

Autonomous navigation system for a differential drive mobile robot.Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 52(2):841–852, 2024

Miguel A Ferreira, Luís C Moreira, and António M Lopes. Autonomous navigation system for a differential drive mobile robot.Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 52(2):841–852, 2024. 8 APREPRINT- DECEMBER8, 2025

work page 2024
[4]

Control of nonlinear systems with reach-avoid-stay specifications: A Lyapunov-barrier approach with an application to the Moore-Greizer model

Yiming Meng, Yinan Li, and Jun Liu. Control of nonlinear systems with reach-avoid-stay specifications: A Lyapunov-barrier approach with an application to the Moore-Greizer model. InAmerican Control Conference, pages 2284–2291, 2021

work page 2021
[5]

A fully automated framework for control of linear systems from temporal logic specifications.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53(1):287–297, 2008

Marius Kloetzer and Calin Belta. A fully automated framework for control of linear systems from temporal logic specifications.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53(1):287–297, 2008

work page 2008
[6]

Spatiotemporal tubes for temporal reach-avoid-stay tasks in unknown systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2025

Ratnangshu Das, Ahan Basu, and Pushpak Jagtap. Spatiotemporal tubes for temporal reach-avoid-stay tasks in unknown systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2025

work page 2025
[7]

Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

Paulo Tabuada.Verification and control of hybrid systems: a symbolic approach. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

work page 2009
[8]

Ames, Xiangru Xu, Jessy W

Aaron D. Ames, Xiangru Xu, Jessy W. Grizzle, and Paulo Tabuada. Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 62(8):3861–3876, 2017

work page 2017
[9]

Collision cone control barrier functions: Experimental validation on UGVs for kinematic obstacle avoidance

Bhavya Giri Goswami, Manan Tayal, Karthik Rajgopal, Pushpak Jagtap, and Shishir Kolathaya. Collision cone control barrier functions: Experimental validation on UGVs for kinematic obstacle avoidance. InAmerican Control Conference (ACC), 2024

work page 2024
[10]

A collision cone approach for control barrier functions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07043, 2024

Manan Tayal, Bhavya Giri Goswami, Karthik Rajgopal, Rajpal Singh, Tejas Rao, Jishnu Keshavan, Pushpak Jagtap, and Shishir Kolathaya. A collision cone approach for control barrier functions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07043, 2024

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Dimarogonas

Lars Lindemann and Dimos V . Dimarogonas. Control barrier functions for signal temporal logic tasks.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 3(1):96–101, 2019

work page 2019
[12]

Smooth converse Lyapunov-barrier theorems for asymptotic stability with safety constraints and reach-avoid-stay specifications.Automatica, 144:110478, 2022

Yiming Meng, Yinan Li, Maxwell Fitzsimmons, and Jun Liu. Smooth converse Lyapunov-barrier theorems for asymptotic stability with safety constraints and reach-avoid-stay specifications.Automatica, 144:110478, 2022

work page 2022
[13]

Disturbance rejection mpc for tracking of wheeled mobile robot.IEEE/ASME Transactions On Mechatronics, 22(6):2576–2587, 2017

Zhongqi Sun, Yuanqing Xia, Li Dai, Kun Liu, and Dailiang Ma. Disturbance rejection mpc for tracking of wheeled mobile robot.IEEE/ASME Transactions On Mechatronics, 22(6):2576–2587, 2017

work page 2017
[14]

Dynamic control barrier function-based model predictive control to safety-critical obstacle-avoidance of mobile robot

Zhuozhu Jian, Zihong Yan, Xuanang Lei, Zihong Lu, Bin Lan, Xueqian Wang, and Bin Liang. Dynamic control barrier function-based model predictive control to safety-critical obstacle-avoidance of mobile robot. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3679–3685, 2023

work page 2023
[15]

Peng Hang, Sunan Huang, Xinbo Chen, and Kok Kiong Tan. Path planning of collision avoidance for unmanned ground vehicles: A nonlinear model predictive control approach.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 235(2):222–236, 2021

work page 2021
[16]

Bechlioulis and George A

Charalampos P. Bechlioulis and George A. Rovithakis. Robust adaptive control of feedback linearizable MIMO nonlinear systems with prescribed performance.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 53(9):2090–2099, 2008

work page 2090
[17]

Approximation-free prescribed performance control with prescribed input constraints.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 7:1261–1266, 2023

Pankaj K Mishra and Pushpak Jagtap. Approximation-free prescribed performance control with prescribed input constraints.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 7:1261–1266, 2023

work page 2023
[18]

Dimarogonas

Fei Chen and Dimos V . Dimarogonas. Funnel-based cooperative control of leader-follower multi-agent systems under signal temporal logic specifications. InEuropean Control Conference, pages 906–911, 2022

work page 2022
[19]

Path-following through control funnel functions

Hadi Ravanbakhsh, Sina Aghli, Christoffer Heckman, and Sriram Sankaranarayanan. Path-following through control funnel functions. InIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 401–408, 2018

work page 2018
[20]

Prescribed time scale robot navigation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(2):1191–1198, 2018

Constantinos Vrohidis, Panagiotis Vlantis, Charalampos P Bechlioulis, and Kostas J Kyriakopoulos. Prescribed time scale robot navigation.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 3(2):1191–1198, 2018

work page 2018
[21]

Kdf: Kinodynamic motion planning via geometric sampling-based algorithms and funnel control.IEEE Transactions on robotics, 39(2):978–997, 2022

Christos K Verginis, Dimos V Dimarogonas, and Lydia E Kavraki. Kdf: Kinodynamic motion planning via geometric sampling-based algorithms and funnel control.IEEE Transactions on robotics, 39(2):978–997, 2022

work page 2022
[22]

Kinodynamic motion planning via funnel control for underactuated unmanned surface vehicles.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 32(6):2114–2125, 2024

Dženan Lapandi´c, Christos K Verginis, Dimos V Dimarogonas, and Bo Wahlberg. Kinodynamic motion planning via funnel control for underactuated unmanned surface vehicles.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 32(6):2114–2125, 2024

work page 2024
[23]

Prescribed-time reach-avoid-stay specifications for unknown systems: A spatiotemporal tubes approach.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 8:946–951, 2024

Ratnangshu Das and Pushpak Jagtap. Prescribed-time reach-avoid-stay specifications for unknown systems: A spatiotemporal tubes approach.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 8:946–951, 2024

work page 2024
[24]

E. D. Sontag.Mathematical control theory: deterministic finite dimensional systems, volume 6. Springer Science and Business Media, 2013

work page 2013
[25]

Reactive safe path following for differential drive mobile robots using control barrier functions

Naeim Ebrahimi Toulkani, Hossein Abdi, Olli Koskelainen, and Reza Ghabcheloo. Reactive safe path following for differential drive mobile robots using control barrier functions. In10th International Conference on Control, Mechatronics and Automation (ICCMA), pages 60–65, 2022. 9

work page 2022