pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.05694 · v4 · submitted 2025-12-05 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.HE· hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Nearly Degenerate Majorana Dark Matter and Its Self-Interactions in a Gauged U(1)_{L_μ - L_τ} Model

Kwei-Chou Yang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEhep-ex
keywords Majorana dark matterself-interacting dark matterU(1)_{Lμ−Lτ}core-cusp problemthermal relic abundanceZ' gauge bosonmuon g-2
0
0 comments X

The pith

A strong Yukawa coupling in a U(1)_{Lμ−Lτ} model simultaneously fixes the thermal relic density and generates self-interactions for nearly degenerate Majorana dark matter in the 10–75 GeV range.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs an extension of the Standard Model with a gauged U(1)_{Lμ−Lτ} symmetry in which spontaneous breaking produces a dominant Majorana mass term for dark fermions through a strong Yukawa interaction with a light scalar. This interaction splits the fermions into two nearly degenerate states, with the lighter one serving as dark matter. For dark matter masses between 10 and 75 GeV and a scalar mediator at tens of MeV, the same coupling controls the annihilation rate that sets the observed relic abundance while also producing elastic self-scattering cross sections large enough to address galactic core-cusp problems. The model further accommodates the muon g-2 anomaly through its Z' gauge boson and derives joint bounds on the scalar mass and Higgs mixing angle from recent LZ direct detection results.

Core claim

Within the 10–75 GeV dark matter mass window and with a scalar mediator at the tens-of-MeV scale, the strong Yukawa coupling that generates the dominant Majorana mass term dictates the thermal relic abundance through annihilation processes and simultaneously induces significant elastic self-interactions that resolve small-scale structure anomalies such as the core-cusp problem while remaining consistent with massive cluster constraints and LZ 2025 direct detection limits.

What carries the argument

The strong Yukawa coupling of the dark fermions to the scalar mediator, which both generates the Majorana mass splitting between the two nearly degenerate states and controls the annihilation and self-scattering rates.

If this is right

  • The self-interaction cross section reaches values around 1 cm²/g that flatten density profiles in dwarf galaxies while satisfying cluster constraints.
  • Recent LZ 2025 data impose upper limits on the Higgs mixing angle α for given scalar masses.
  • The Z' boson remains in thermal equilibrium in the early universe and contributes to the muon g-2 anomaly within allowed parameter space.
  • The relic density is fixed primarily by the strong Yukawa-driven annihilation channels rather than gauge interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If velocity-dependent self-interactions from this mechanism are mapped in hydrodynamic simulations, they could distinguish this model from velocity-independent alternatives in observations of galactic cores.
  • The requirement of a light scalar mediator suggests possible connections to other light-force models that unify relic density with structure-formation problems.
  • Updated direct detection experiments could further restrict the allowed range of the scalar mass independently of astrophysical self-interaction data.

Load-bearing premise

The scalar mediator mass sits at the tens-of-MeV scale and the dark matter mass lies between 10 and 75 GeV, allowing one strong Yukawa coupling to set both the relic density and the self-interaction strength.

What would settle it

A measurement of the dark matter self-interaction cross section per unit mass in dwarf galaxies or clusters that lies well below the value required to flatten cusps for a 10–75 GeV particle with a tens-of-MeV mediator would rule out the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.05694 by Kwei-Chou Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The parameter space of the gauged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Left panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The derived dark gauge coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The evolution of the ratios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Contours of the excited state lifetime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The ratio of the Sommerfeld-enhanced integrand at different rms relative velocities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Top panels: The Sommerfeld enhancement factor as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Velocity-averaged annihilation cross sections for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Current 90% CL exclusion limits and future projections for the Higgs mixing angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Left panels: The transfer cross section per unit mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: depicts the diagrams for elastic scattering χ± S → χ± S, which are relevant for the kinetic energy transfer between χ± and S. The u-channel diagram (on the right) is derived from the s-channel diagram (on the left) through crossing symmetry. For nonrelativistic dark matter, its temperature evolution follows the equation dTDM dt +2HTDM = − 1 n X i=+,− 2ni γi (TDM − T) + . . . , (F1) where n = n+ + n−, and … view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Comparison of kinetic energy injection rates (blue), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a model of nearly degenerate Majorana dark matter (DM) in a gauged $U(1)_{L_\mu - L_\tau}$ extension of the Standard Model. Spontaneous symmetry breaking generates a dominant Majorana mass via a strong Yukawa coupling, splitting the dark fermion into two nearly degenerate states. The lighter state ($\chi_-$) is the DM candidate, with an allowed mass of $\sim 10$ GeV to several hundred GeV. Crucially, within the $10 \sim 75$ GeV mass range and a scalar mediator at the tens of MeV scale, this strong coupling dictates the thermal relic abundance and induces significant elastic self-interactions. These self-interactions naturally resolve small-scale structure anomalies, such as the core-cusp problem, while satisfying massive cluster constraints. Furthermore, we place stringent joint constraints on the scalar mass and the Higgs mixing angle $\alpha$ using the latest LZ 2025 direct detection data. The model's gauge boson $Z^\prime$ maintains early-Universe thermal equilibrium and accommodates the muon anomalous magnetic moment $(g-2)_\mu$, remaining consistent with updated cosmological and experimental bounds.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a gauged U(1)_{L_μ - L_τ} extension of the Standard Model featuring nearly degenerate Majorana dark matter fermions χ± whose mass splitting is generated by a strong Yukawa coupling to a scalar mediator. For DM masses in the 10–75 GeV window and mediator masses of tens of MeV, the same coupling is asserted to fix the thermal relic density via annihilation while simultaneously producing velocity-dependent elastic self-interactions large enough to address small-scale structure anomalies (core-cusp problem) yet consistent with massive-cluster bounds. Joint constraints from LZ 2025 direct-detection data are placed on the scalar mass and Higgs mixing angle α; the associated Z′ gauge boson is shown to remain in thermal equilibrium, accommodate (g−2)_μ, and satisfy updated cosmological and experimental limits.

Significance. If the claimed parameter window survives a complete treatment of Sommerfeld corrections and co-annihilation, the work supplies a concrete, anomaly-free realization in which a single strong Yukawa coupling links the observed relic density to astrophysically relevant self-interactions. The incorporation of LZ 2025 limits and the (g−2)_μ explanation broadens its phenomenological reach and offers testable predictions for direct detection and collider searches.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and the central claim in §4: the assertion that the strong Yukawa coupling 'dictates' both the relic abundance and the required self-interaction cross section (σ/m ∼ 0.1–1 cm²/g at dwarf velocities) is load-bearing. For a light scalar mediator the annihilation rate receives velocity-dependent Sommerfeld enhancements and possible co-annihilation contributions from the heavier nearly-degenerate state; without an explicit scan demonstrating that the single coupling value fixed by Ωh² ≈ 0.12 simultaneously satisfies the self-interaction window while remaining below cluster limits at v ∼ 1000 km/s, the existence of the quoted 10–75 GeV range is not yet established.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§5] Clarify in the text or a dedicated subsection how the direct-detection rate for the nearly degenerate Majorana pair is computed, including any interference or form-factor effects relevant to the LZ 2025 analysis.
  2. [Figures 3–4] Figure captions for self-interaction plots should explicitly state the velocity ranges corresponding to dwarf galaxies versus massive clusters to allow direct comparison with the quoted constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. The major comment identifies a key point regarding the need for explicit verification of the parameter space. We address it below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the central claim.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and the central claim in §4: the assertion that the strong Yukawa coupling 'dictates' both the relic abundance and the required self-interaction cross section (σ/m ∼ 0.1–1 cm²/g at dwarf velocities) is load-bearing. For a light scalar mediator the annihilation rate receives velocity-dependent Sommerfeld enhancements and possible co-annihilation contributions from the heavier nearly-degenerate state; without an explicit scan demonstrating that the single coupling value fixed by Ωh² ≈ 0.12 simultaneously satisfies the self-interaction window while remaining below cluster limits at v ∼ 1000 km/s, the existence of the quoted 10–75 GeV range is not yet established.

    Authors: We agree that the strong Yukawa coupling is central to linking the relic density and self-interactions, and that a complete treatment must include Sommerfeld enhancements and co-annihilation. Our current analysis computes the thermal relic density via the standard Boltzmann equation with the velocity-dependent annihilation cross section mediated by the light scalar, and evaluates the self-interaction transfer cross section using the Born approximation for the effective potential at relevant velocities. However, we have not presented a full numerical scan that simultaneously fixes the coupling to Ωh² ≈ 0.12 while explicitly verifying the self-interaction window (including Sommerfeld resummation in annihilation) and checking against cluster bounds at v ∼ 1000 km/s. To address this, we will add such an explicit parameter scan in the revised §4, solving the coupled Boltzmann equations with co-annihilation between χ+ and χ− and incorporating the velocity-dependent Sommerfeld factor. The scan will demonstrate the existence (or adjusted boundaries) of the 10–75 GeV window and include updated figures showing consistency with the required σ/m values at dwarf velocities while remaining below massive-cluster limits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: relic density fixes coupling value, which then independently sets self-interaction strength in viable mass window

full rationale

The paper constructs a model with a free strong Yukawa coupling y that generates the Majorana mass splitting and controls both annihilation (for relic density) and elastic scattering (for self-interactions). For the stated mass window the same y that yields Ωh² ≈ 0.12 also produces σ/m in the range needed for core-cusp resolution. This is a standard parameter choice followed by an independent observable check, not a reduction of one quantity to the other by definition or by renaming a fit. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansätze are invoked in the provided text to justify the central claim. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (observed relic density and structure-formation data).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claims rest on several free parameters (Yukawa strength, scalar mass, mixing angle) and domain assumptions about symmetry breaking and stability; three new entities are introduced without independent falsifiable handles outside the model.

free parameters (3)
  • strong Yukawa coupling
    Generates the dominant Majorana mass and controls both relic density and self-interaction cross section.
  • scalar mediator mass
    Set to tens of MeV to produce significant elastic scattering in the 10-75 GeV dark matter window.
  • Higgs mixing angle α
    Jointly constrained with scalar mass by LZ 2025 data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Spontaneous breaking of U(1)_{Lμ-Lτ} generates a dominant Majorana mass term that splits the dark fermion into two nearly degenerate states.
    Invoked to produce the small mass splitting required for the phenomenology.
  • domain assumption The lighter state χ− is stable and constitutes all the dark matter.
    Standard selection of the DM candidate.
invented entities (3)
  • Z' gauge boson no independent evidence
    purpose: Maintains early-Universe thermal equilibrium and contributes to muon g-2.
    New gauge boson from the U(1) extension.
  • light scalar mediator no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates elastic self-interactions and helps set relic density.
    Introduced to realize the required self-interaction strength.
  • nearly degenerate Majorana pair χ± no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the dark matter candidate with controlled mass splitting.
    Postulated dark-sector fermions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5530 in / 1944 out tokens · 80673 ms · 2026-05-17T01:18:20.133220+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 136 canonical work pages · 65 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Since the resolution of small-scale structure problems typically favorsm − ∼10 GeV (see Sec

    and XENONnT [96] provide competitive but slightly less stringent constraints, LZ 2025 cur- rently serves as the leading representative benchmark. Since the resolution of small-scale structure problems typically favorsm − ∼10 GeV (see Sec. X), we selectm − = 10 GeV andm − ≥100 GeV as two representative benchmarks. This comparison illustrates the sensitivit...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Inelastic Dark Matter

    D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, “Inelastic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D64, 043502 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0101138 [hep-ph]]. 56

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  3. [3]

    The Status of Inelastic Dark Matter

    D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, “The Status of inelastic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D72, 063509 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0402065 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    Direct Detection of Multi-component Secluded WIMPs

    B. Batell, M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “Direct Detection of Multi-component Secluded WIMPs,” Phys. Rev. D79, 115019 (2009) [arXiv:0903.3396 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Magnetic Inelastic Dark Matter

    S. Chang, N. Weiner and I. Yavin, “Magnetic Inelastic Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D82, 125011 (2010) [arXiv:1007.4200 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Inelastic extraU(1) charged scalar dark matter,

    N. Okada and O. Seto, “Inelastic extraU(1) charged scalar dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.2, 023522 (2020) [arXiv:1908.09277 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    A minimalistic model for inelastic dark matter,

    G. Dalla Valle Garcia, “A minimalistic model for inelastic dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B862, 139320 (2025) [arXiv:2411.02147 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    A Viable New Model for Dark Matter,

    X. G. Wang and A. W. Thomas, “A Viable New Model for Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2510.24114 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    A Theory of Dark Matter

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, “A Theory of Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D79, 015014 (2009) [arXiv:0810.0713 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    Astrophysical Signatures of Secluded Dark Matter

    M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, “Astrophysical Signatures of Secluded Dark Matter,” Phys. Lett. B671, 391-397 (2009) [arXiv:0810.1502 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    PAMELA, DAMA, INTEGRAL and Signatures of Metastable Excited WIMPs

    D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, N. Weiner and I. Yavin, “PAMELA, DAMA, INTEGRAL and Signatures of Metastable Excited WIMPs,” JCAP09, 037 (2009) [arXiv:0903.1037 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    Cosmic-ray cooling in active galactic nuclei as a new probe of inelastic dark matter,

    R. A. Gustafson, G. Herrera, M. Mukhopadhyay, K. Murase and I. M. Shoemaker, “Cosmic-ray cooling in active galactic nuclei as a new probe of inelastic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.12, L121303 (2025) [arXiv:2408.08947 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    dSphobic Dark Matter,

    A. Berlin, J. W. Foster, D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, “dSphobic Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2504.12372 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Gamma-Rays and Gravitational Waves from Inelastic Higgs Portal Dark Matter,

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic, D. Rocha and S. Roy, “Gamma-Rays and Gravitational Waves from Inelastic Higgs Portal Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2507.22975 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Reviving MeV-GeV indirect detection with inelastic dark matter,

    A. Berlin, G. Krnjaic and E. Pinetti, “Reviving MeV-GeV indirect detection with inelastic dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.3, 035015 (2024) [arXiv:2311.00032 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    X-rays from Inelastic Dark Matter Freeze-in,

    G. Krnjaic, D. McKeen, R. Mizuta, G. Mohlabeng, D. E. Morrissey and D. Tuckler, “X-rays from Inelastic Dark Matter Freeze-in,” [arXiv:2509.19428 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    Discovering Inelastic Thermal-Relic Dark Matter at Colliders

    E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic and B. Shuve, “Discovering Inelastic Thermal-Relic Dark Matter at Colliders,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.6, 063523 (2016) [arXiv:1508.03050 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Inelastic Dark Matter at the LHC Lifetime Frontier: ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA

    A. Berlin and F. Kling, “Inelastic Dark Matter at the LHC Lifetime Frontier: ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, CODEX-b, FASER, and MATHUSLA,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.1, 015021 (2019) [arXiv:1810.01879 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Examining scalar portal inelastic dark matter with lepton fixed target experiments,

    I. V. Voronchikhin and D. V. Kirpichnikov, “Examining scalar portal inelastic dark matter with lepton fixed target experiments,” [arXiv:2505.04290 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Discovering Dark Matter with the MUonE Experiment,

    G. Krnjaic, D. Rocha and I. R. Wang, “Discovering Dark Matter with the MUonE Experiment,” 57 Phys. Rev. Lett.134, no.16, 161801 (2025) [arXiv:2409.00170 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Not-so-inelastic Dark Matter,

    G. D. V. Garcia, F. Kahlhoefer, M. Ovchynnikov and T. Schwetz, “Not-so-inelastic Dark Matter,” JHEP02, 127 (2025) [arXiv:2405.08081 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Semi-Visible Dark Photon Phenomenology at the GeV Scale,

    A. M. Abdullahi, M. Hostert, D. Massaro and S. Pascoli, “Semi-Visible Dark Photon Phenomenology at the GeV Scale,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.1, 015032 (2023) [arXiv:2302.05410 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Cosmology and signals of light pseudo-Dirac dark matter,

    M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez and N. Toro, “Cosmology and signals of light pseudo-Dirac dark matter,” JHEP04, 060 (2022) [arXiv:2108.13422 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Inelastic freeze-in,

    S. Heeba, T. Lin and K. Schutz, “Inelastic freeze-in,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.9, 095016 (2023) [arXiv:2304.06072 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Resonant pseudo-Dirac dark matter as a sub-GeV thermal target,

    N. Brahma, S. Heeba and K. Schutz, “Resonant pseudo-Dirac dark matter as a sub-GeV thermal target,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.3, 035006 (2024) [arXiv:2308.01960 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Dark Matter and Electroweak Baryogenesis with SpontaneousCPViolation in the Early Universe,

    S. Roy, “Dark Matter and Electroweak Baryogenesis with SpontaneousCPViolation in the Early Universe,” [arXiv:2509.19982 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure

    S. Tulin and H. B. Yu, “Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,” Phys. Rept.730, 1-57 (2018) [arXiv:1705.02358 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions,

    S. Adhikari, A. Banerjee, K. K. Boddy, F. Y. Cyr-Racine, H. Desmond, C. Dvorkin, B. Jain, F. Kahlhoefer, M. Kaplinghat and A. Nierenberg,et al.“Astrophysical tests of dark matter self-interactions,” Rev. Mod. Phys.97, no.4, 045004 (2025) [arXiv:2207.10638 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Dark Matter Halos as Particle Colliders: A Unified Solution to Small-Scale Structure Puzzles from Dwarfs to Clusters

    M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin and H. B. Yu, “Dark Matter Halos as Particle Colliders: Unified Solution to Small-Scale Structure Puzzles from Dwarfs to Clusters,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.4, 041302 (2016) [arXiv:1508.03339 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    NEW Z-prime PHENOMENOLOGY,

    X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas, “NEW Z-prime PHENOMENOLOGY,” Phys. Rev. D43, 22-24 (1991)

    work page 1991

  31. [31]

    Simplest Z-prime model,

    X. G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. Volkas, “Simplest Z-prime model,” Phys. Rev. D44, 2118-2132 (1991)

    work page 1991

  32. [32]

    Explaining Dark Matter and $B$ Decay Anomalies with an $L_\mu - L_\tau$ Model

    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, S. Profumo and F. S. Queiroz, “Explaining dark matter and B decay anomalies with anL µ −L τ model,” JHEP12, 106 (2016) [arXiv:1609.04026 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Self-interacting dark matter and muon $g-2$ in a gauged U$(1)_{L_{\mu} - L_{\tau}}$ model

    A. Kamada, K. Kaneta, K. Yanagi and H. B. Yu, “Self-interacting dark matter and muong−2 in a gaugedU(1) Lµ−Lτ model,” JHEP06, 117 (2018) [arXiv:1805.00651 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Let there be Light Dark Matter: The gauged $U(1)_{L_\mu-L_\tau}$ case

    P. Foldenauer, “Light dark matter in a gaugedU(1) Lµ−Lτ model,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.3, 035007 (2019) [arXiv:1808.03647 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Cosmology With a Very Light $L_\mu - L_\tau$ Gauge Boson

    M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and M. Pierre, “Cosmology with A Very Light L µ −L τ Gauge Boson,” JHEP03, 071 (2019) [arXiv:1901.02010 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Search for U(1) Lµ−Lτ charged dark matter with neutrino telescope,

    K. Asai, S. Okawa and K. Tsumura, “Search for U(1) Lµ−Lτ charged dark matter with neutrino telescope,” JHEP03, 047 (2021) [arXiv:2011.03165 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Muon (g−2) and XENON1T excess with boosted dark matter inL µ −L τ model,

    D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu, “Muon (g−2) and XENON1T excess with boosted dark matter inL µ −L τ model,” Phys. Lett. B820, 136577 (2021) [arXiv:2104.05656 [hep-ph]]. 58

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Simplest and Most Predictive Model of Muon g-2 and Thermal Dark Matter,

    I. Holst, D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, “Simplest and Most Predictive Model of Muon g-2 and Thermal Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, no.14, 141802 (2022) [arXiv:2107.09067 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    U(1) Lµ−Lτ for light dark matter,g µ −2, the 511 keV excess and the Hubble tension,

    M. Drees and W. Zhao, “U(1) Lµ−Lτ for light dark matter,g µ −2, the 511 keV excess and the Hubble tension,” Phys. Lett. B827, 136948 (2022) [arXiv:2107.14528 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    General kinetic mixing in gaugedU(1) Lµ−Lτ model for muon g-2 and dark matter,

    T. Hapitas, D. Tuckler and Y. Zhang, “General kinetic mixing in gaugedU(1) Lµ−Lτ model for muon g-2 and dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.1, 016014 (2022) [arXiv:2108.12440 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Direct detection of light dark matter charged under a Lµ-Lτ symmetry,

    P. Figueroa, G. Herrera and F. Ochoa, “Direct detection of light dark matter charged under a Lµ-Lτ symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.9, 095018 (2024) [arXiv:2404.03090 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Probing the Lµ-Lτgauge boson at the MUonE experiment,

    K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi, N. Nagata, S. Y. Tseng and J. Wada, “Probing the Lµ-Lτgauge boson at the MUonE experiment,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.5, L051702 (2022) [arXiv:2109.10093 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    ConstrainingU(1) Lµ−Lτ charged dark matter model for muon g -2 anomaly with AMS-02 electron and positron data,

    L. Zu, X. Pan, L. Feng, Q. Yuan and Y. Z. Fan, “ConstrainingU(1) Lµ−Lτ charged dark matter model for muon g -2 anomaly with AMS-02 electron and positron data,” JCAP08, no.08, 028 (2022) [arXiv:2104.03340 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update

    R. Aliberti, T. Aoyama, E. Balzani, A. Bashir, G. Benton, J. Bijnens, V. Biloshytskyi, T. Blum, D. Boito and M. Bruno,et al.“The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update,” Phys. Rept.1143, 1-158 (2025) [arXiv:2505.21476 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm,

    D. P. Aguillardet al.[Muon g-2], “Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, no.16, 161802 (2023) [arXiv:2308.06230 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Detailed report on the measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm,

    D. P. Aguillardet al.[Muon g-2], “Detailed report on the measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.3, 032009 (2024) [arXiv:2402.15410 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL

    G. W. Bennettet al.[Muon g-2], “Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL,” Phys. Rev. D73, 072003 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ex/0602035 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Aoyama et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model,Phys

    T. Aoyama, N. Asmussen, M. Benayoun, J. Bijnens, T. Blum, M. Bruno, I. Caprini, C. M. Carloni Calame, M. C` e and G. Colangelo,et al.“The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model,” Phys. Rept.887, 1-166 (2020) [arXiv:2006.04822 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Muon g-2,

    C. Davies, “Muon g-2,” PoSLATTICE2024, 019 (2025) [arXiv:2503.03364 [hep-lat]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Aalberset al.(LZ), Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys

    J. Aalberset al.[LZ], “Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, no.1, 011802 (2025) [arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Workman et al

    R.L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Sub-GeV dark matter and nano-Hertz gravitational waves from a classically conformal dark sector,

    S. Balan, T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, J. Matuszak and C. Tasillo, “Sub-GeV dark matter and nano-Hertz gravitational waves from a classically conformal dark sector,” JCAP08, 062 (2025) [arXiv:2502.19478 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,

    B. Holdom, “Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,” Phys. Lett. B166, 196-198 (1986)

    work page 1986

  54. [54]

    Schmitz, Kinetic Mixing in Field Theory (DESY Workshop Seminar, Winter Semester 2009/2010, 2009) 59

    K. Schmitz, Kinetic Mixing in Field Theory (DESY Workshop Seminar, Winter Semester 2009/2010, 2009) 59

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Evaluating the price of tiny kinetic mixing,

    T. Gherghetta, J. Kersten, K. Olive and M. Pospelov, “Evaluating the price of tiny kinetic mixing,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.9, 095001 (2019) [arXiv:1909.00696 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    The Muon g-2

    F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, “The Muon g-2,” Phys. Rept.477, 1-110 (2009) [arXiv:0902.3360 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  57. [57]

    Neutrino Tridents and W Z Interference,

    S. R. Mishraet al.[CCFR], “Neutrino Tridents and W Z Interference,” Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 3117-3120 (1991)

    work page 1991

  58. [58]

    Neutrino Trident Production: A Powerful Probe of New Physics with Neutrino Beams

    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, “Neutrino Trident Production: A Powerful Probe of New Physics with Neutrino Beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 091801 (2014) [arXiv:1406.2332 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR

    J. P. Leeset al.[BaBar], “Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.1, 011102 (2016) [arXiv:1606.03501 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Bauer, P

    M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel, “Hunting All the Hidden Photons,” JHEP07, 094 (2018) [arXiv:1803.05466 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    White Dwarfs constrain Dark Forces

    H. K. Dreiner, J. F. Fortin, J. Isern and L. Ubaldi, “White Dwarfs constrain Dark Forces,” Phys. Rev. D88, 043517 (2013) [arXiv:1303.7232 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino

    G. Bellini, J. Benziger, D. Bick, S. Bonetti, G. Bonfini, M. Buizza Avanzini, B. Caccianiga, L. Cadonati, F. Calaprice and C. Carraro,et al.“Precision measurement of the 7Be solar neutrino interaction rate in Borexino,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 141302 (2011) [arXiv:1104.1816 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys.652, C4 (2021)] [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Neutralino Relic Density including Coannihilations

    J. Edsjo and P. Gondolo, “Neutralino relic density including coannihilations,” Phys. Rev. D56, 1879-1894 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9704361 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  65. [65]

    D. G. Cerdeno, T. Delahaye and J. Lavalle, Nucl. Phys. B854, 738-779 (2012) [arXiv:1108.1128 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, “Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,” Nucl. Phys. B360, 145 (1991)

    work page 1991

  67. [67]

    Freeze-out forbidden dark matter in the hidden sector in the mass range from sub-GeV to TeV,

    K. C. Yang, “Freeze-out forbidden dark matter in the hidden sector in the mass range from sub-GeV to TeV,” JHEP11, 083 (2022) [arXiv:2209.10827 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990)

    work page 1990

  69. [69]

    New physics in light of theH 0 tension: An alternative view,

    S. Vagnozzi, “New physics in light of theH 0 tension: An alternative view,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.2, 023518 (2020) [arXiv:1907.07569 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess and J. Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav.38, no.15, 153001 (2021) [arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    MeV-scale Reheating Temperature and Thermalization of Neutrino Background

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama, “MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background,” Phys. Rev. D62, 023506 (2000) [astro-ph/0002127]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  72. [72]

    Sommerfeld enhancement for a Yukawa potential

    R. Iengo, “Sommerfeld enhancement for a Yukawa potential,” [arXiv:0903.0317 [hep-ph]]. 60

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Sommerfeld enhancement: general results from field theory diagrams

    R. Iengo, “Sommerfeld enhancement: General results from field theory diagrams,” JHEP05, 024 (2009) [arXiv:0902.0688 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  74. [74]

    Indirect search for dark matter from the Galactic Center and halo with the Super-Kamiokande detector,

    K. Abeet al.[Super-Kamiokande], “Indirect search for dark matter from the Galactic Center and halo with the Super-Kamiokande detector,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.7, 072002 (2020) [arXiv:2005.05109 [hep-ex]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Indirect Search for Dark Matter with the Super-Kamiokande Detector

    K. Frankiewicz, “Indirect Search for Dark Matter with the Super-Kamiokande Detector”, Ph.D. thesis, National Centre For Nuclear Research, Poland, Apr. 2018

    work page 2018

  76. [76]

    Measurements of the atmospheric neutrino flux by Super-Kamiokande: energy spectra, geomagnetic effects, and solar modulation

    E. Richardet al.[Super-Kamiokande], “Measurements of the atmospheric neutrino flux by Super-Kamiokande: energy spectra, geomagnetic effects, and solar modulation,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.5, 052001 (2016) [arXiv:1510.08127 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    Search of Dark Matter Annihilation in the Galactic Centre using the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope

    S. Adrian-Martinezet al.[ANTARES], “Search of Dark Matter Annihilation in the Galactic Centre using the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope,” JCAP10, 068 (2015) [arXiv:1505.04866 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    Dark matter annihilation to neutrinos,

    C. A. Arg¨ uelles, A. Diaz, A. Kheirandish, A. Olivares-Del-Campo, I. Safa and A. C. Vincent, “Dark matter annihilation to neutrinos,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93, no.3, 035007 (2021) [arXiv:1912.09486 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Search for GeV-scale Dark Matter from the Galactic Center with IceCube-DeepCore,

    R. Abbasiet al.[IceCube], “Search for GeV-scale Dark Matter from the Galactic Center with IceCube-DeepCore,” [arXiv:2511.00918 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions,

    F. Bergsmaet al.[CHARM], “Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions,” Phys. Lett. B157, 458-462 (1985)

    work page 1985

Showing first 80 references.