pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.06942 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-07 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

L_infty-algebraic extensions of non-Lorentzian kinematical Lie algebras, gravities, and brane couplings

Hyungrok Kim
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP
keywords L_infinity algebrascentral extensionskinematical Lie algebrasnon-Lorentzian gravityNewton-Cartan gravitybrane couplingsp-form fieldsBargmann algebra
0
0 comments X

The pith

L∞-algebraic central extensions of kinematical Lie algebras produce towers of p-form fields for brane couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper classifies all L∞-algebraic central extensions of kinematical Lie algebras not depending on spatial rotation generators, as well as iterated ones for codimensions ≤3. For the Galilean algebra and similar ones like Newton-Hooke and static algebra, these extensions form sequences in each degree. These sequences correspond to towers of p-form fields that, after conventional constraints, include absolute time as a zero-form and higher forms as wedge products of the Bargmann gravitational field strengths. The resulting fields provide natural couplings for (p-1)-branes to the gravities and Wess-Zumino-Witten terms involving doubled spatial coordinates.

Core claim

The paper classifies L∞-algebraic central extensions of kinematical Lie algebras independent of spatial rotations and their iterations for codim ≤3. For Galilean, Newton-Hooke and static algebras these form sequences in each degree corresponding to p-form field towers, unlike for Carrollian algebras. After constraints the zero-form gives absolute time and higher forms are wedge products of Bargmann field strengths, providing (p-1)-brane couplings that induce velocity-dependent effects with torsion and WZW terms with doubled coordinates that avoid doubled physics.

What carries the argument

L∞-algebraic central extensions of kinematical Lie algebras independent of spatial rotations, which generalize the Bargmann extension and correspond to p-form field towers.

If this is right

  • The Bargmann central extension is one term in a sequence for Galilean-type algebras.
  • The p-form fields provide (p-1)-brane couplings to non-Lorentzian gravities.
  • These couplings lead to velocity-dependent gravitational effects in the presence of torsion.
  • WZW terms for brane actions introduce doubled spatial coordinates without doubled physics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This pattern may generalize to other non-Lorentzian kinematical structures not covered in the classification.
  • The doubled coordinates suggest possible connections to T-duality in non-Lorentzian string theory contexts.
  • Such brane couplings could be tested in models of condensed matter systems with non-Lorentzian symmetries.

Load-bearing premise

That conventional constraints can be imposed on the L∞ cocycles so that the resulting p-form fields remain consistent with the non-Lorentzian gravity equations and produce well-defined brane couplings without introducing new inconsistencies.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the cocycles for the Galilean algebra, followed by imposition of constraints and checking whether the resulting brane couplings satisfy the non-Lorentzian gravity equations without contradictions or new inconsistencies.

read the original abstract

The Newtonian limit of Newton-Cartan gravity relies crucially on the Lie-algebraic central extension to the Galilean algebra, namely the Bargmann algebra. Lie-algebraic central extensions naturally generalise to $L_\infty$-algebraic central extensions, which in turn classify branes in superstring theory via the brane bouquet. This paper classifies all $L_\infty$-algebraic central extensions of all kinematical Lie algebras that do not depend on the spatial rotation generators as well as all iterated central extensions thereof (for codimensions $\le3$). The Bargmann central extension of the Galilean algebra then appears as merely one term in a sequence of $L_\infty$-algebraic central extensions in each degree; a similar situation obtains for the Newton-Hooke algebra and the static algebra, but not for the Carrollian algebra nor those kinematical Lie algebras that are not Wigner-\.In\"on\"u deformations of a simple algebra. The sequence of $L_\infty$-algebraic central extensions in each degree then corresponds to a tower of $p$-form fields. After imposing conventional constraints, the zero-form field provides absolute time, and the higher-form fields are certain wedge products of the field strengths of the one-form (Bargmann) gravitational field. These then provide natural $(p-1)$-brane couplings to the corresponding non-Lorentzian gravities, which are found to produce velocity-dependent gravitational effects in the presence of torsion. The $L_\infty$-algebraic cocycles also provide Wess-Zumino-Witten terms for the $(p-1)$-brane action, which require the introduction of doubled spatial coordinates that are reminiscent of double field theory, but which (in some cases at least, and given appropriate kinetic terms) do not result in doubled physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript classifies all L_∞-algebraic central extensions of non-Lorentzian kinematical Lie algebras independent of spatial rotation generators, as well as their iterated extensions, for codimensions ≤ 3. It establishes that the sequence of these extensions in each degree corresponds to a tower of p-form fields. Upon imposing conventional constraints, the zero-form field is identified with absolute time, while higher-form fields are expressed as wedge products of the field strengths of the one-form Bargmann gravitational field. These structures furnish (p-1)-brane couplings to the corresponding non-Lorentzian gravities, leading to velocity-dependent gravitational effects in the presence of torsion, and provide Wess-Zumino-Witten terms for the brane actions that involve doubled spatial coordinates.

Significance. This classification extends the well-known Bargmann central extension of the Galilean algebra to a full L_∞-algebraic setting, providing a unified algebraic origin for p-form fields in non-Lorentzian geometries. The distinction drawn between algebras that admit such towers (e.g., Galilean, Newton-Hooke, static) and those that do not (e.g., Carrollian) is a concrete result that clarifies the scope of the construction. The proposed brane couplings and the appearance of doubled coordinates offer new perspectives on non-Lorentzian gravity and potential connections to double field theory, which could be of interest to researchers working on non-relativistic limits of string theory and gravity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Classification section] The classification is presented for algebras not depending on spatial rotations and codim ≤3, but the explicit cocycle formulas are not listed in the main text or an appendix; without them, it is difficult to confirm that the sequence directly corresponds to the claimed tower of p-form fields without additional choices or post-hoc adjustments.
  2. [Physical interpretation and brane couplings section] The imposition of conventional constraints is used to link the cocycles to absolute time and wedge products of field strengths. However, there is no explicit demonstration that these constrained cocycles preserve consistency with the non-Lorentzian gravity equations in the presence of torsion or that the resulting brane couplings are free of new inconsistencies in the L_∞ relations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract mentions that the Bargmann extension appears as one term in a sequence; this could be highlighted more explicitly with a small table or diagram showing the degree-by-degree extensions for the Galilean case.
  2. [Notation and setup] Clarify the definition of 'conventional constraints' early in the manuscript, as it is pivotal for the physical claims but appears to be introduced without a precise prior definition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough reading of the manuscript and for the constructive summary and comments. We address each major comment in turn below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Classification section] The classification is presented for algebras not depending on spatial rotations and codim ≤3, but the explicit cocycle formulas are not listed in the main text or an appendix; without them, it is difficult to confirm that the sequence directly corresponds to the claimed tower of p-form fields without additional choices or post-hoc adjustments.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit cocycle formulas were not reproduced in full in the main text or appendix. The classification in the manuscript proceeds by solving the L_∞ cocycle conditions degree by degree for the indicated algebras and codimensions, yielding a unique tower in each case. To make this transparent, the revised version will include the explicit cocycle expressions in a new appendix. These formulas are obtained directly from the L_∞ relations with no additional choices; each higher cocycle is fixed once the lower ones are chosen, thereby confirming the direct correspondence to the tower of p-form fields. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Physical interpretation and brane couplings section] The imposition of conventional constraints is used to link the cocycles to absolute time and wedge products of field strengths. However, there is no explicit demonstration that these constrained cocycles preserve consistency with the non-Lorentzian gravity equations in the presence of torsion or that the resulting brane couplings are free of new inconsistencies in the L_∞ relations.

    Authors: The L_∞ relations are satisfied by construction of the iterated central extensions, independent of the subsequent imposition of conventional constraints. The constraints themselves are the standard ones used in the non-Lorentzian gravity literature to recover absolute time and the correct gravitational field strengths. We acknowledge that an explicit verification of consistency under these constraints would be useful. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph in the physical interpretation section that substitutes the constrained cocycles into the relevant gravity equations (including torsion) and confirms that no new inconsistencies arise in the L_∞ relations or in the resulting brane couplings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct L_∞ cohomology computation on listed algebras produces extensions without reduction to fitted inputs or self-citation chains

full rationale

The paper performs an explicit classification of L_∞-algebraic central extensions for the specified kinematical Lie algebras (those independent of spatial rotations, codimension ≤3) and their iterated extensions. The central results follow from direct computation of the relevant cohomology groups, with the Bargmann extension appearing as one term in the resulting sequence. The subsequent mapping to p-form fields, imposition of conventional constraints, and extraction of brane couplings are interpretive steps that apply the computed cocycles to the non-Lorentzian gravity setup; they do not redefine or fit any output back to the input algebras or to prior author-specific results. No load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation whose content is itself unverified within the paper, nor does any equation equate a derived quantity to a previously fitted parameter by construction. The derivation therefore remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard definition of L_infinity algebras and their cohomology, the known list of kinematical Lie algebras, and the conventional constraints used in non-Lorentzian supergravity; none of these are derived inside the paper.

axioms (2)
  • standard math L_infinity algebras are defined via the standard higher homotopy relations on a graded vector space with a differential and higher brackets.
    Invoked throughout the classification procedure described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The listed kinematical Lie algebras (Galilean, Newton-Hooke, static, Carrollian, etc.) are the complete set of Wigner-Inönü contractions of simple algebras that do not involve spatial rotations.
    The paper restricts attention to this subset without re-deriving the classification of kinematical algebras.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5651 in / 1669 out tokens · 43072 ms · 2026-05-17T00:16:58.283051+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 35 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Review on non-relativistic gravity.Frontiers in Physics, 11:1116888, March 2023.arXiv: 2212.11309,doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1116888

    Jelle Hartong, Niels Anne Jacob Obers, and Gerben Oling. Review on non-relativistic gravity.Frontiers in Physics, 11:1116888, March 2023.arXiv: 2212.11309,doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1116888

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1116888 2023

  2. [2]

    A non-lorentzian primer.SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 69:1, May 2023

    EricArnoldBergshoeff,JoséMiguelFigueroa-O’Farrill,andJoaquimGomis. A non-lorentzian primer.SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 69:1, May 2023. arXiv:2206.12177,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.69

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslectnotes.69 2023

  3. [3]

    Non-Lorentzian supergravity

    Eric Arnold Bergshoeff and Jan Rosseel. Non-Lorentzian supergravity. In Cosimo Bambi, Leonardo Modesto, and Ilya Lvovich Shapiro (Илья Льво- вич Шапиро), editors,Handbook of Quantum Gravity. Springer, Singapore, May 2023.arXiv:2211.02604,doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9_52-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9_52-1 2023

  4. [4]

    Non-lorentzian spacetimes.Differential Geometry and its Applications, 82:101894, June 2022.arXiv:2204.13609, doi:10.1016/j.difgeo.2022.101894

    José Miguel Figueroa-O’Farrill. Non-lorentzian spacetimes.Differential Geometry and its Applications, 82:101894, June 2022.arXiv:2204.13609, doi:10.1016/j.difgeo.2022.101894

    work page doi:10.1016/j.difgeo.2022.101894 2022

  5. [5]

    Glenn Barnich and Cédric Troessaert. Symmetries of asymptotically flat four-dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited.Physical Review Letters, 105(11):111103, September 2010.arXiv:0909.2617, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.105.111103

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    The BMS/GCA correspondence

    Arjun Bagchi. Correspondence between asymptotically flat space- times and nonrelativistic conformal field theories.Physical Review Letters, 105(11):171601, October 2010. arXiv:1006.3354, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.105.171601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    BMS/GCA Redux: Towards Flatspace Holography from Non-Relativistic Symmetries

    Arjun Bagchi and Reza Fareghbal. BMS/GCA redux: Towards flatspace holography from non-relativistic symmetries.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012(10):092, October 2012. arXiv:1203.5795, doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2012)092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    Torsional Newton-Cartan Geometry and Lifshitz Holography

    Morten H. Christensen, Jelle Hartong, Niels Anne Jacob Obers, and Blaise Rollier. Torsional Newton-Cartan geometry and Lifshitz holo- graphy.Physical Review D, 89(5):061901, March 2014.arXiv:1311.4794, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.061901

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.061901 2014

  9. [9]

    Boundary Stress-Energy Tensor and Newton-Cartan Geometry in Lifshitz Holography

    Morten H. Christensen, Jelle Hartong, Niels Anne Jacob Obers, and Blaise Rollier. Boundary stress-energy tensor and Newton-Cartan geometry in Lifshitz holography.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014(01):057, January 2014.arXiv:1311.6471,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep01(2014)057 2014

  10. [10]

    Carroll geometry meets de Sitter space via holography, June 2025

    ChristopherDavidAndrewBlair,NielsAnneJacobObers,andZiqiYan( 燕 子骐). Carroll geometry meets de Sitter space via holography, June 2025. arXiv:2506.19720,doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.19720. 27

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.19720 2025

  11. [11]

    Carrollian physics at the black hole horizon.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(16):165002, August 2019

    Laura Donnay and Charles Marteau. Carrollian physics at the black hole horizon.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(16):165002, August 2019. arXiv:1903.09654,doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab2fd5

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab2fd5 2019

  12. [12]

    Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry

    Christian Duval, Gary William Gibbons, and Péter A. Horváthy. Con- formal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31(9):092001, May 2014.arXiv:1402.5894, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/ 9/092001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/ 2014

  13. [13]

    La Sapienza

    DennisHansen,JelleHartong,andNielsAnneJacobObers. Non-relativistic expansion of the Einstein–Hilbert Lagrangian. In Elia Stefano Battistelli, Robert T. Jantzen, and Remo Ruffini, editors,The Fifteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Re- lativity, Astrophysics, and Relativistic Field Theories: Proceed...

    work page doi:10.1142/9789811258251_0098 2018

  14. [14]

    Galilean first-order formulation for the nonrelativistic expansion of general relativity.Physical Review D, 104(6):L061501, September 2021

    Dennis Hansen, Jelle Hartong, Niels Anne Jacob Obers, and Gerben Oling. Galilean first-order formulation for the nonrelativistic expansion of general relativity.Physical Review D, 104(6):L061501, September 2021. arXiv: 2012.01518,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L061501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.l061501 2021

  15. [15]

    Rahul Mahajan Nandkishore and Michael A. Hermele. Fractons.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 10:295–313, March 2019.arXiv:1803. 11196,doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013604

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013604 2019

  16. [16]

    Fracton phases of matter

    Michael Pretko, Xie Chen (陈谐), and Yizhi You. Fracton phases of matter. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 35(06):2030003, February 2020. arXiv:2001.01722,doi:10.1142/S0217751X20300033

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x20300033 2020

  17. [17]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, May 2012.doi:10.1017/ CBO9781139026833

    DanielZisselFreedmanandAntoineVanProeyen.Supergravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, May 2012.doi:10.1017/ CBO9781139026833

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Newtonian Gravity and the Bargmann Algebra

    Roel Andringa, Eric Arnold Bergshoeff, Sudhakar Panda, and Mees de Roo. NewtoniangravityandtheBargmannalgebra.ClassicalandQuantumGravity, 28(10):105011, May 2011.arXiv:1011.1145, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/ 10/105011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/ 2011

  19. [19]

    Newton-Cartan Supergravity

    Roel Andringa, Eric Arnold Bergshoeff, Jan Rosseel, and Ergin Sez- gin. 3D Newton–Cartan supergravity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30(20):205005,October2013. arXiv:1305.6737, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/ 30/20/205005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/

  20. [20]

    Gravity from AKSZ-Manin theories in two, three, and four dimensions

    Leron Borsten, Dimitri Kanakaris Decavel, and Hyungrok Kim (金炯錄). Gravity from AKSZ-Manin theories in two, three, and four dimensions. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2025(06):075, June 2025.arXiv:2410.10755, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)075

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2025)075 2025

  21. [21]

    Leron Borsten, Dimitri Kanakaris Decavel, and Hyungrok Kim (金炯 錄). Three-dimensional SL(2,ℝ)Yang-Mills theory is equivalent to three-dimensional gravity with background sources.Physical Review D, 28 111(2):025005, January 2025.arXiv:2408.14228, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 111.025005

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2025

  22. [22]

    𝐿∞-algebrasofclassicalfieldtheoriesandtheBatalin–Vilkoviskyformalism

    Branislav Jurčo, Lorenzo Raspollini, Christian Sämann, and Martin Wolf. 𝐿∞-algebrasofclassicalfieldtheoriesandtheBatalin–Vilkoviskyformalism. Fortschritte der Physik, 67(7):1900025, July 2019.arXiv:1809.09899, doi: 10.1002/prop.201900025

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.201900025 2019

  23. [23]

    AndreasKraftandJonasSchnitzer.Anintroductionto 𝐿∞-algebrasandtheir homotopy theory for the working mathematician.Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 36(01):2330006, February 2024.arXiv:2207.01861, doi:10.1142/ S0129055X23300066

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Introduction to sh Lie algebras for physicists

    Thomas J. Lada and James Dillon Stasheff. Introduction to SH Lie algebras for physicists.International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 32(7):1087–1104, July 1993.arXiv:hep-th/9209099,doi:10.1007/BF00671791

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/bf00671791 1993

  25. [25]

    Higher gauge theory

    Leron Borsten, Mehran Jalali Farahani, Branislav Jurčo, Hyungrok Kim (金 炯錄), Jiří Nárožný, Dominik Rist, Christian Sämann, and Martin Wolf. Higher gauge theory. In Richard Joseph Szabo and Martin Bojowald, editors,Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, volume 4, pages 159–185. Academic Press, New York, United States of America, second edition, 2025. arXiv:...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00217-2 2025

  26. [26]

    Towards an M5-Brane Model I: A 6d Superconformal Field Theory

    Christian Sämann and Lennart Schmidt. Towards an M5-brane model I: A 6dsuperconformalfieldtheory.JournalofMathematicalPhysics,59(4):043502, April 2018.arXiv:1712.06623,doi:10.1063/1.5026545

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.5026545 2018

  27. [27]

    Towards an M5-brane model II: Metric string structures.Fortschritte der Physik, 68(8):2000051, August 2020

    Christian Sämann and Lennart Schmidt. Towards an M5-brane model II: Metric string structures.Fortschritte der Physik, 68(8):2000051, August 2020. arXiv:1908.08086,doi:10.1002/prop.202000051

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.202000051 2020

  28. [28]

    Towards an M5-brane model

    Dominik Rist, Christian Saemann, and Miro van der Worp. Towards an M5-brane model. Part III. Self-duality from additional trivial fields. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(06):36, June 2021.arXiv:2012.09253, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)036

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2021)036 2021

  29. [29]

    Domenico Fiorenza, Hisham Sati, and Urs Schreiber. Super-Lie 𝑛- algebra extensions, higher WZW models and super-𝑝-branes with tensor multiplet fields.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 12(2):1550018, February 2015. arXiv:1308.5264, doi:10.1142/ S0219887815500188

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Domenico Fiorenza, Hisham Sati, and Urs Schreiber. Rational sphere valued supercocycles in 𝑀-theory and type IIA string theory.Journal of Geometry and Physics, 114:91–108, April 2017.arXiv:1606.03206, doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2016.11.024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2016.11.024 2017

  31. [31]

    Domenico Fiorenza, Hisham Sati, and Urs Schreiber. T-duality from super Lie 𝑛-algebra cocycles for super𝑝-branes.Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 22(5):1209–1270, May 2018.arXiv:1611.06536, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2018.v22.n5.a3. 29

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.2018.v22.n5.a3 2018

  32. [32]

    M-theory from the superpoint.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 108(12):2695–2727, December 2018.arXiv:1702

    John Huerta and Urs Schreiber. M-theory from the superpoint.Letters in Mathematical Physics, 108(12):2695–2727, December 2018.arXiv:1702. 01774,doi:10.1007/s11005-018-1110-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11005-018-1110-z 2018

  33. [33]

    Higher T-duality in M-theory via local supersymmetry.Physics Letters B, 781:694–698, June 2018.arXiv:1805

    Hisham Sati and Urs Schreiber. Higher T-duality in M-theory via local supersymmetry.Physics Letters B, 781:694–698, June 2018.arXiv:1805. 00233,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.058

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.058 2018

  34. [34]

    Aspects of nonrelativistic strings

    Gerben Oling and Ziqi Yan (燕子骐). Aspects of nonrelativistic strings. Frontiers in Physics, 10:832271, June 2022. arXiv:2202.12698, doi:10. 3389/fphy.2022.832271

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Duality symmetric closed string theory and interacting chiral scal- ars.Nuclear Physics B, 350(1–2):395–440, February 1991.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(91)90266-Z

    Arkady Aleksandrovich Tseytlin (Аркадий Александрович Цейтлин). Duality symmetric closed string theory and interacting chiral scal- ars.Nuclear Physics B, 350(1–2):395–440, February 1991.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(91)90266-Z

    work page 1991

  36. [36]

    Duality symmetric formulation of string world sheet dynamics.Physics LettersB,242(2):163–174,June1990

    Arkady Aleksandrovich Tseytlin (Аркадий Александрович Цейтлин). Duality symmetric formulation of string world sheet dynamics.Physics LettersB,242(2):163–174,June1990. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91454-J

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)91454-j

  37. [37]

    A Geometry for Non-Geometric String Backgrounds

    Christopher Michael Hull. A Geometry for non-geometric string back- grounds.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2005(10):065, October 2005. arXiv:hep-th/0406102,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/065

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/065 2005

  38. [38]

    Background Field Equations for the Duality Symmetric String

    David Simon Berman, Neil B. Copland, and Daniel C. Thompson. Back- ground field equations for the duality symmetric string.Nuclear Phys- ics B, 791(1–2):175–191, March 2008.arXiv:0708.2267, doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysb.2007.09.021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2008

  39. [39]

    Neil B. Copland. A double sigma model for double field theory.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012(04):044, April 2012.arXiv:1111.1828, doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2012)044

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2012)044 2012

  40. [40]

    Comparing Double String Theory Actions

    LucaDeAngelis,GabrieleGionti,S.J.,RaffaeleMarotta,andFrancoPezzella. Comparing double string theory actions.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014(04):171, April 2014.arXiv:1312.7367, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014) 171

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2014 2014

  41. [41]

    EricArnoldBergshoeff,JaumeGomis,andZiqiYan( 燕子骐).Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(11):133, November 2018.arXiv:1806.06071,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)133 2018

  42. [42]

    Note about T-duality of non-relativistic string.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(08):074, August 2019.arXiv:1811.12658, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2019)074

    Josef Klusoň. Note about T-duality of non-relativistic string.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(08):074, August 2019.arXiv:1811.12658, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2019)074

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2019)074 2019

  43. [43]

    T-duality of non-relativistic string in torsional Newton- Cartan background.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2020(05):024, May 2020

    Josef Klusoň. T-duality of non-relativistic string in torsional Newton- Cartan background.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2020(05):024, May 2020. arXiv:1909.13508,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)024

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)024 2020

  44. [44]

    T-duality in nonre- lativistic open string theory.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(02):087, February 2021.arXiv:2008.05493,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)087

    Jaume Gomis, Ziqi Yan (燕子骐), and Matthew Yu. T-duality in nonre- lativistic open string theory.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(02):087, February 2021.arXiv:2008.05493,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)087. 30

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2021)087 2021

  45. [45]

    Double Field Theory: A Pedagogical Review

    Gerardo Marcelo Aldazabal, Diego Marques, and Carmen Alicia Núñez. Double field theory: A pedagogical review.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 30(16):163001, July 2013.arXiv:1305.1907, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/ 16/163001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/ 2013

  46. [46]

    The Spacetime of Double Field Theory: Review, Remarks, and Outlook

    Olaf Hohm, Dieter Lüst, and Barton Zwiebach Cantor. The spacetime of double field theory: Review, remarks, and outlook.Fortschritte der Physik, 61(10):926–966, October 2013.arXiv:1309.2977, doi:10.1002/ prop.201300024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    David Simon Berman and Christopher David Andrew Blair. The geometry, branes and applications of exceptional field theory.International Journal of Modern Physics A, 35(30):2030014, October 2020.arXiv:2006.09777, doi:10.1142/S0217751X20300148

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x20300148 2020

  48. [48]

    L-infinity algebra connections and applications to String- and Chern-Simons n-transport

    Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber, and James Dillon Stasheff. 𝐿∞-algebra connections and applications to String- and Chern-Simons𝑛-transport. In Bertfried Fauser, Jürgen Tolksdorf, and Eberhard Hermann Erich Zeidler, editors,Quantum Field Theory: Competitive Models, pages 303– 424, Basel, Switzerland, December 2008. Birkhäuser.arXiv:0801.3480, doi:10.1007/978-3-...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8736-5_17 2008

  49. [49]

    Twisted differential String and Fivebrane structures

    Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber, and James Dillon Stasheff. Differential twisted String and Fivebrane structures.Communications in Mathem- atical Physics, 315(1):169–213, October 2012. arXiv:0910.4001, doi: 10.1007/s00220-012-1510-3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-012-1510-3 2012

  50. [50]

    Explicit non- Abelian gerbes with connections, February 2022

    Dominik Rist, Christian Sämann, and Martin Wolf. Explicit non- Abelian gerbes with connections, February 2022. arXiv:2203.00092, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.00092

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.00092 2022

  51. [51]

    Lada and James Dillon Stasheff

    Thomas J. Lada and James Dillon Stasheff. The resurgence of𝐿∞structures in field theory.Differential Geometry and its Applications, 77:101755, August 2021.doi:10.1016/j.difgeo.2021.101755

    work page doi:10.1016/j.difgeo.2021.101755 2021

  52. [52]

    Higher-dimensional kinematical Lie algebras via deformation theory

    José Miguel Figueroa-O’Farrill. Higher-dimensional kinematical Lie algeb- ras via deformation theory.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59(6):061702, June 2018.arXiv:1711.07363,doi:10.1063/1.5016616

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.5016616 2018

  53. [53]

    Classification of kinematical Lie algebras

    José Miguel Figueroa-O’Farrill. Classification of kinematical Lie algebras, November 2017.arXiv:1711.05676,doi:10.48550/arXiv.1711.05676

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.05676 2017

  54. [54]

    Kinematical Lie algebras via deformation theory

    José Miguel Figueroa-O’Farrill. Kinematical Lie algebras via deformation theory.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59(6):061701, June 2018. arXiv: 1711.06111,doi:10.1063/1.5016288

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.5016288 2018

  55. [55]

    Kinematical Lie algebras in 2+1 dimensions

    Tomasz Andrzejewski and José Miguel Figueroa-O’Farrill. Kinematical lie algebras in2+1 dimensions.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59(6):061703, June 2018.arXiv:1802.04048,doi:10.1063/1.5025785

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.5025785 2018

  56. [56]

    Sugli spazi a tre dimensioni che ammettono un gruppo continuo di movimenti.Memorie di Matematica e di Fisica della Societa Italiana delle Scienze, Serie Terza, 11:267–352, 1898

    Luigi Bianchi. Sugli spazi a tre dimensioni che ammettono un gruppo continuo di movimenti.Memorie di Matematica e di Fisica della Societa Italiana delle Scienze, Serie Terza, 11:267–352, 1898. URL:https://media. accademiaxl.it/memorie/S3-VXI-1898/Bianchi267-352.pdf. 31

    work page

  57. [57]

    On the three-dimensional spaces which admit a continuous group of motions.General Relativity and Gravitation, 33(12):2171–2253, December 2001.doi:10.1023/A:1015357132699

    Luigi Bianchi. On the three-dimensional spaces which admit a continuous group of motions.General Relativity and Gravitation, 33(12):2171–2253, December 2001.doi:10.1023/A:1015357132699

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1015357132699 2001

  58. [58]

    Exotic Branes in String Theory

    Jan de Boer and Masaki Shigemori (重森正樹). Exotic branes in string theory.Physics Reports, 532(3):65–118, November 2013.arXiv:1209.6056, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.07.003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.07.003 2013

  59. [59]

    Shapere, Cumrun Vafa, and Shing-Tung Yau( 丘成桐)

    Brian Randolph Greene, Alfred D. Shapere, Cumrun Vafa, and Shing-Tung Yau( 丘成桐). StringycosmicstringsandnoncompactCalabi-Yaumanifolds. Nuclear Physics B, 337(1):1–36, June 1990.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90) 90248-C

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90 1990

  60. [60]

    Newton-Cartan (super)gravity as a non-relativistic limit

    Eric Arnold Bergshoeff, Jan Rosseel, and Thomas Zojer. Newton–Cartan (super)gravity as a non-relativistic limit.Classical and Quantum Grav- ity, 32(20):205003, October 2015. arXiv:1505.02095, doi:10.1088/ 0264-9381/32/20/205003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  61. [61]

    Duality anomalies in linearized gravity.Phys- ical Review D, 112(4):045010, August 2025

    Leron Borsten, Michael James Duff, Dimitri Kanakaris Decavel, and Hy- ungrok Kim (金炯錄). Duality anomalies in linearized gravity.Phys- ical Review D, 112(4):045010, August 2025. arXiv:2504.15973, doi: 10.1103/3nkh-t15m

    work page doi:10.1103/3nkh-t15m 2025

  62. [62]

    Michael Geracie, Kartik Prabhu, and Matthew M. Roberts. Curved non- relativistic spacetimes, Newtonian gravitation and massive matter.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 56(10):103505, October 2015.arXiv:1503.02682, doi:10.1063/1.4932967

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.4932967 2015

  63. [63]

    Newton-Cartan Gravity and Torsion

    Eric Arnold Bergshoeff, Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis (Αθανάσιος Χατζη- σταυρακίδης), Luca Romano, and Jan Rosseel. Newton-Cartan gravity and torsion.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(10):194, October 2017. arXiv:1708.05414,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)194

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)194 2017

  64. [64]

    Pyvision: Agentic vision with dynamic tooling.CoRR, abs/2507.07998, 2025

    José Miguel Figueroa-O’Farrill. On the intrinsic torsion of spacetime structures, September 2020. arXiv:2009.01948, doi:10.48550/arXiv. 2009.01948

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Torsional Newton-Cartan Geometry and the Schr\"odinger Algebra

    Eric Arnold Bergshoeff, Jelle Hartong, and Jan Rosseel. Torsional Newton–Cartan geometry and the Schrödinger algebra.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(13):135017, July 2015. arXiv:1409.5555, doi:10. 1088/0264-9381/32/13/135017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Torsional Newton-Cartan gravity from the large $c$ expansion of General Relativity

    Dieter van den Bleeken. Torsional Newton–Cartan gravity from the large𝑐 expansionofgeneralrelativity.ClassicalandQuantumGravity,34(18):185004, September 2017.arXiv:1703.03459,doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa83d4

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa83d4 2017

  67. [67]

    Spacetime Symmetries of the Quantum Hall Effect

    Michael Geracie, Ðàm Thanh Sơn, Chaolun Wu (吴超伦), and Shao-Feng Wu (吴绍锋). Spacetime symmetries of the quantum Hall effect.Physical Review D, 91(4):045030, February 2015.arXiv:1407.1252, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.91.045030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    World Scientific, Singapore, June 1991.doi:10.1142/0224

    LeonardoCastellani,RiccardoD’Auria,andPietroGiuseppeFré.Supergrav- ity and Superstrings: A Geometric Perspective. World Scientific, Singapore, June 1991.doi:10.1142/0224. 32

    work page doi:10.1142/0224 1991

  69. [69]

    A𝜎-model interpretation of Green- Schwarz covariant superstring action.Physics Letters B, 152(5–6):340–342, March 1985.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90507-6

    Marc Henneaux and Luca Mezincescu. A𝜎-model interpretation of Green- Schwarz covariant superstring action.Physics Letters B, 152(5–6):340–342, March 1985.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90507-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90507-6 1985

  70. [70]

    Brane Effective Actions, Kappa-Symmetry and Applications

    Joan Simón. Brane effective actions, kappa-symmetry and applications. Living Reviews in Relativity, 15:3, February 2012.arXiv:1110.2422, doi: 10.12942/lrr-2012-3. 33

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2012-3 2012