pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.08598 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Horizon brightened acceleration radiation from massive vector fields

Reggie C. Pantig , Ali \"Ovg\"un
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords acceleration radiationProca fieldSchwarzschild black holehorizon brightened radiationgraybody factorsquantum opticsBoulware statedetailed balance
0
0 comments X

The pith

The thermal detailed-balance factor for acceleration radiation stays universal for massive vector fields and depends only on the near-horizon Rindler transformation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a quantum-optical treatment to atoms falling into a Schwarzschild black hole while interacting with a massive spin-1 Proca field. It isolates a single outgoing mode in the Boulware state inside a cavity and uses a near-horizon stationary-phase analysis to separate the thermal kernel from field-specific details. The ratio of excitation to absorption probabilities follows the same universal form set by the coordinate transformation to Rindler observers, independent of the Proca mass or polarization. Absolute rates and spectra nevertheless carry distinctive Proca features including a hard mass threshold, polarization-dependent prefactors, and separate axial and polar graybody factors. The resulting master equation produces a geometric steady state whose entropy flux obeys an area-entropy relation identical in form to the scalar HBAR case, with all vector specifics absorbed into the radiative area change.

Core claim

A near-horizon stationary-phase analysis shows that the thermal detailed-balance factor governing excitation versus absorption is universal and depends only on the near-horizon Rindler coordinate transformation, while the absolute spectra acquire distinctive Proca signatures: a hard mass threshold, polarization-dependent prefactors, and axial/polar graybody transmissions. Promoting single-pass probabilities to escaping rates yields a master equation whose steady state is geometric and whose entropy flux obeys a horizon-brightened acceleration radiation-style area-entropy relation identical in form to the scalar case, with all vector-field specifics entering through the radiative area change.

What carries the argument

The universal near-horizon kernel extracted via stationary-phase analysis from the Rindler coordinate transformation, which factors out of the Proca transmission coefficients and graybody factors.

If this is right

  • The detailed-balance factor remains identical to the scalar case and independent of mass or polarization.
  • Spectra exhibit a sharp mass threshold below which radiation is forbidden.
  • Polarization-resolved graybody factors split the transmission into axial and polar channels.
  • The entropy flux still satisfies the same area-entropy relation as in the scalar HBAR case.
  • Vector specifics appear only through the radiative area change that enters the master equation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same separation between universal kernel and field-specific transmission should hold for other massive fields of arbitrary spin.
  • Detector engineering that resolves polarization or frequency near the mass threshold could directly map the graybody profiles.
  • Extending the cavity analysis to Kerr backgrounds would test whether the universal factor survives rotation-induced frame dragging.
  • Quantitative predictions for observable signals now require only the missing numerical graybody data.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes a cavity that isolates a single outgoing Schwarzschild mode prepared in the Boulware state and relies on the validity of the near-horizon stationary-phase approximation for deriving the universal kernel and the master equation.

What would settle it

A direct numerical computation of the axial and polar graybody transmission profiles for a Proca field around a Schwarzschild black hole, or an observation of whether the excitation-absorption ratio remains strictly independent of field mass and polarization in the low-frequency limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.08598 by Ali \"Ovg\"un, Reggie C. Pantig.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The comoving redshift-Doppler factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The universal thermal kernel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The escaping emission rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we develop a quantum-optical treatment of acceleration radiation for atoms freely falling into a Schwarzschild black hole when the ambient field is a massive spin-1 (Proca) field. Building on the HBAR framework of Scully and collaborators, we analyze two detector realizations: a charged-monopole current coupling and a physical electric-dipole coupling, both within a cavity that isolates a single outgoing Schwarzschild mode prepared in the Boulware state. Using a near-horizon stationary-phase analysis, we show that the thermal detailed-balance factor governing excitation versus absorption is universal and depends only on the near-horizon Rindler coordinate transformation. At the same time, the absolute spectra acquire distinctive Proca signatures: a hard mass threshold, polarization-dependent prefactors, and axial/polar graybody transmissions. Promoting single-pass probabilities to escaping rates yields a master equation whose steady state is geometric and whose entropy flux obeys an horizon brightened acceleration radiation-style area-entropy relation identical in form to the scalar case, with all vector-field specifics entering through the radiative area change. Our results provide a controlled pathway to probe longitudinal versus transverse responses, mass thresholds, and the role of polarization-resolved graybody transmission in acceleration radiation. More precisely, we derive the universal near-horizon kernel and show how the Proca transmission data enter the escaping probabilities, rates, and entropy flux; a dedicated numerical computation of the axial/polar graybody profiles is left for future work. This sets the stage for extensions to rotating backgrounds, alternative exterior states, and detector-engineering strategies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends the HBAR framework to massive spin-1 Proca fields in Schwarzschild spacetime. Using a cavity-isolated single outgoing mode in the Boulware state and a near-horizon stationary-phase analysis, it claims that the thermal detailed-balance factor for detector excitation versus absorption is universal and determined solely by the Rindler coordinate transformation, while the absolute spectra exhibit Proca-specific features including a hard mass threshold, polarization-dependent prefactors, and axial/polar graybody factors. These are promoted to a master equation whose steady state is geometric and whose entropy flux satisfies an area-entropy relation identical in form to the scalar case, with vector specifics entering only through radiative area change.

Significance. If the separation between the universal kernel and the Proca-specific spectra holds, the work provides a controlled extension of acceleration radiation to massive vector fields, enabling future probes of longitudinal versus transverse responses and mass thresholds near black-hole horizons. The explicit pathway from near-horizon kernel through graybody transmission to entropy flux is a constructive contribution, though its robustness depends on the stationary-phase justification.

major comments (2)
  1. [near-horizon stationary-phase analysis] Abstract and the near-horizon stationary-phase analysis: the claim that the thermal detailed-balance factor is universal and depends only on the Rindler coordinate transformation is load-bearing for the central result, yet the Proca mass term and the distinct wave equations for the three polarizations can generate corrections to the phase that enter at the same order as the boost factor when frequencies approach the mass threshold; an explicit demonstration that these corrections vanish in the stationary-point integral is required.
  2. [cavity and mode preparation] The assumption that the cavity isolates a single outgoing Schwarzschild mode prepared in the Boulware state and that the near-horizon stationary-phase approximation remains valid for deriving both the universal kernel and the master equation needs quantitative error estimates, particularly for the polarization-dependent graybody transmissions that are stated to enter the escaping probabilities.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The manuscript notes that a dedicated numerical computation of the axial/polar graybody profiles is left for future work; including at least one illustrative plot or reference to existing Proca graybody literature would strengthen the presentation of the spectra.
  2. [detector realizations] Notation for the two detector realizations (charged-monopole current versus physical electric-dipole coupling) should be introduced with explicit interaction Hamiltonians to clarify how each couples to the Proca field.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our results on HBAR for massive vector fields. We address the major comments point by point below, with planned revisions indicated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and the near-horizon stationary-phase analysis: the claim that the thermal detailed-balance factor is universal and depends only on the Rindler coordinate transformation is load-bearing for the central result, yet the Proca mass term and the distinct wave equations for the three polarizations can generate corrections to the phase that enter at the same order as the boost factor when frequencies approach the mass threshold; an explicit demonstration that these corrections vanish in the stationary-point integral is required.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is needed near the mass threshold. In the revised manuscript we will expand the phase in the stationary-point integral to include the Proca mass term and polarization-dependent dispersion relations. The leading saddle-point contribution remains the universal Rindler boost factor e^{-2πω/κ}, while mass corrections enter only at subleading orders in the large-boost expansion and do not modify the detailed-balance ratio. This calculation will be added as an appendix. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The assumption that the cavity isolates a single outgoing Schwarzschild mode prepared in the Boulware state and that the near-horizon stationary-phase approximation remains valid for deriving both the universal kernel and the master equation needs quantitative error estimates, particularly for the polarization-dependent graybody transmissions that are stated to enter the escaping probabilities.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for quantitative error bounds. In revision we will supply order-of-magnitude estimates showing that, for cavity bandwidth Δω ≪ ω and frequencies ω ≫ m, the relative error in the stationary-phase kernel is O(κ/ω). The graybody factors enter the escaping rates multiplicatively and cancel from the universal kernel; we will clarify this separation and note that the area-entropy relation holds independently of their precise values. A full numerical graybody computation is left for future work as stated in the manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Near-horizon stationary-phase derivation of universal kernel is independent of Proca details

full rationale

The paper performs a near-horizon stationary-phase analysis on the Rindler coordinate transformation to obtain the thermal detailed-balance factor and states that this factor depends only on the coordinate map while Proca mass thresholds, polarization prefactors, and graybody transmissions enter solely through the absolute spectra and radiative area change. The entropy-flux relation is presented as identical in form to the scalar HBAR case precisely because the kernel is extracted from the same coordinate transformation; the vector-field specifics are inserted afterward via transmission data rather than being fitted or redefined into the kernel. No equation is shown to reduce to a prior result by construction, no parameter is fitted to a subset and then relabeled as a prediction, and the central claim rests on the stationary-phase integral rather than a self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions from quantum field theory in curved spacetime plus the specific near-horizon approximation and detector couplings; the Proca mass enters as a physical parameter rather than a fitted constant.

free parameters (1)
  • Proca field mass
    The mass of the vector field is introduced as a physical parameter that sets the hard threshold in the spectra and affects transmission.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Ambient field prepared in the Boulware state for the isolated outgoing mode
    Invoked for the single Schwarzschild mode inside the cavity.
  • domain assumption Near-horizon Rindler coordinate transformation governs the stationary-phase analysis
    Used to establish the universal thermal detailed-balance factor independent of field details.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5576 in / 1600 out tokens · 86726 ms · 2026-05-17T00:14:09.845283+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Using a near-horizon stationary-phase analysis, we show that the thermal detailed-balance factor governing excitation versus absorption is universal and depends only on the near-horizon Rindler coordinate transformation. ... the absolute spectra acquire distinctive Proca signatures: a hard mass threshold, polarization-dependent prefactors, and axial/polar greybody transmissions.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    the Planckian detailed-balance factor ... is independent of the detector model ... the field’s spin, the Proca mass, and greybody details. The reason is structural: after isolating a single outgoing Schwarzschild mode, every first-order counter-rotating amplitude reduces to an integral ... where G is a smooth, slowly varying function ... None of these ingredients alters the phase driver t−r∗.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    This singles out the terms displayed in (57)-(58) and underlies the emission-before-absorption picture adopted in the master-equation treatment

    Initial |g; 0B⟩ forbids the rotating ∝a νℓmλσeg channel; only the counter-rotating ∝a † νℓmλσeg contributes to excitation. This singles out the terms displayed in (57)-(58) and underlies the emission-before-absorption picture adopted in the master-equation treatment

    work page

  2. [2]

    In the stationary-phase evaluation, the rapidly varying piece depends only on ν > 0, thus preserving the same detailed-balance structure as in Eqs

    Asymptotically, propagation requires ν≥m V , k ∞(ν) = q ν2 −m 2 V ,(59) so modes below threshold do not contribute to the escaping flux. In the stationary-phase evaluation, the rapidly varying piece depends only on ν > 0, thus preserving the same detailed-balance structure as in Eqs. (B13)-(B15) of [6]

    work page

  3. [3]

    For a narrow, axially aligned, radially infalling beam (as in the pencil-like cloud of Fig

    The coupling to a given( ℓ, m)is weighted by Yℓm(θ(τ), ϕ(τ)). For a narrow, axially aligned, radially infalling beam (as in the pencil-like cloud of Fig. 1), the trajectory satisfies ϕ =const and θ≈ 0, which selects predominantly m = 0 and suppresses |m| ≥ 1through the small-angle behavior of Yℓm. The cavity’s mode selector then isolates a single (ℓ, m)ch...

    work page

  4. [4]

    For the monopole coupling, the polarization sum produces X λ u·ε(λ) 2 =−1 + Ω2(τ, ν) m2 V ,(60) whereΩ = −k·u grows without bound near the horizon; this enhances the longitudinal contribution of the massive vector relative to the massless limit and feeds only a smooth prefactor in the final probability. For the dipole coupling the contraction ˆdµ ˆdνΠµν p...

    work page

  5. [5]

    (B14) in [ 6] in the scalar case recurs here, while the mass and polarization affect only the prefactor (and the ν≥m V threshold)

    Since all master fields reduce to plane waves ∼e −iν(t−r∗) as r→r + g , the same stationary-phase structure that yielded Eq. (B14) in [ 6] in the scalar case recurs here, while the mass and polarization affect only the prefactor (and the ν≥m V threshold). These rules ensure that, after summing over( m, λ)and implementing the single-mode cavity filter, the...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Black holes and entropy,

    Jacob D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D7, 2333–2346 (1973)

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    Black hole explosions,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions,” Nature248, 30–31 (1974)

    work page 1974

  8. [8]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199–220 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    work page 1975

  9. [9]

    Notes on black hole evaporation,

    W. G. Unruh, “Notes on black hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    work page 1976

  10. [10]

    Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,

    David G. Boulware, “Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,” Phys. Rev. D11, 1404 (1975)

    work page 1975

  11. [11]

    Radiation from Atoms Falling into a Black Hole

    Marlan O. Scully, Stephen Fulling, David Lee, Don N. Page, Wolfgang Schleich, and Anatoly Svidzinsky, “Quantum optics approach to radiation from atoms falling into a black hole,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.115, 8131–8136 (2018), arXiv:1709.00481 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Quantum optics meets black hole ther- modynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: I. Master equation for acceleration radiation,

    A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ordonez, and M. O. Scully, “Quantum optics meets black hole ther- modynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: I. Master equation for acceleration radiation,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021), 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084086, arXiv:2108.07570 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.084086 2021

  13. [13]

    Quantum optics meets black hole ther- modynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: II. Thermodynamics of acceleration radiation,

    A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ordonez, and M. O. Scully, “Quantum optics meets black hole ther- modynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: II. Thermodynamics of acceleration radiation,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021), 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084085, arXiv:2108.07572 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.084085 2021

  14. [14]

    Excitation of an Atom by a Uniformly Accelerated Mirror through Virtual Transitions,

    Anatoly A. Svidzinsky, Jonathan S. Ben-Benjamin, Stephen A. Fulling, and Don N. Page, “Excitation of an Atom by a Uniformly Accelerated Mirror through Virtual Transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 071301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Unruh Acceleration Radiation Revisited,

    J. S. Ben-Benjaminet al., “Unruh Acceleration Radiation Revisited,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34, 1941005 (2019), arXiv:1906.01729 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Acceleration radiation of an atom freely falling into a Kerr black hole and near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics,

    A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ordonez, and M. O. Scully, “Acceleration radiation of an atom freely falling into a Kerr black hole and near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. D104, 065006 (2021), arXiv:2011.08368 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Near-horizon aspects of acceleration radiation by free fall of an atom into a black hole,

    H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, and C. R. Ordonez, “Near-horizon aspects of acceleration radiation by free fall of an atom into a black hole,” Phys. Rev. D102, 085010 (2020), arXiv:2009.06580 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Near horizon aspects of acceleration radiation of an atom falling into a class of static spherically symmetric black hole geometries,

    Soham Sen, Rituparna Mandal, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Near horizon aspects of acceleration radiation of an atom falling into a class of static spherically symmetric black hole geometries,” Phys. Rev. D106, 025004 (2022), arXiv:2205.11260 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Equivalence principle and HBAR entropy of an atom falling into a quantum corrected black hole,

    Soham Sen, Rituparna Mandal, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Equivalence principle and HBAR entropy of an atom falling into a quantum corrected black hole,” Phys. Rev. D105, 085007 (2022), arXiv:2202.00671 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Horizon brightened accelerated radiation in the background of braneworld black holes,

    Ashmita Das, Soham Sen, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Horizon brightened accelerated radiation in the background of braneworld black holes,” Phys. Rev. D109, 064087 (2024), arXiv:2311.13557 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Derivative coupling in horizon brightened acceleration radiation: a quantum optics approach

    Ashmita Das, Anjana Krishnan, Soham Sen, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Derivative coupling in horizon brightened acceleration radiation: A quantum optics approach,” Phys. Rev. D112, 065006 (2025), arXiv:2505.16897 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Atom falling into a quantum corrected charged black hole and HBAR entropy,

    Arpita Jana, Soham Sen, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Atom falling into a quantum corrected charged black hole and HBAR entropy,” Phys. Rev. D110, 026029 (2024), arXiv:2405.13087 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Inverse logarithmic correction in the horizon brightened acceleration radiation entropy of an atom falling into a renormalization group improved charged black hole,

    Arpita Jana, Soham Sen, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Inverse logarithmic correction in the horizon brightened acceleration radiation entropy of an atom falling into a renormalization group improved charged black hole,” Phys. Rev. D111, 085017 (2025), arXiv:2501.17579 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Nonthermal acceleration radiation of atoms near a black hole in presence of dark energy,

    Syed Masood A. S. Bukhari, Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat, Chenni Xu, and Li-Gang Wang, “Nonthermal acceleration radiation of atoms near a black hole in presence of dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D107, 105017 (2023), arXiv:2211.08793 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Seeing dark matter via acceleration radiation,

    Syed Masood A. S. Bukhari and Li-Gang Wang, “Seeing dark matter via acceleration radiation,” Phys. Rev. D109, 045009 (2024), arXiv:2309.11958 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    HBAR entropy of Infalling Atoms into a GUP-corrected Schwarzschild Black Hole and equivalence principle,

    Ali ¨Ovg¨ un and Reggie C. Pantig, “HBAR entropy of Infalling Atoms into a GUP-corrected Schwarzschild Black Hole and equivalence principle,” Physics Letters A568, 131201 (2026)

    work page 2026

  27. [27]

    Acceleration radiation from derivative-coupled atoms falling in modified gravity black holes,

    Reggie C. Pantig and Ali ¨Ovg¨ un, “Acceleration radiation from derivative-coupled atoms falling in modified gravity black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1183 (2025), arXiv:2508.11734 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Floquet resonances and redshift-enhanced acceleration radiation from vibrating atoms in Schwarzschild spacetime,

    Reggie C. Pantig, Ali ¨Ovg¨ un, Syed Masood, and Li-Gang Wang, “Floquet resonances and redshift-enhanced acceleration radiation from vibrating atoms in Schwarzschild spacetime,” (2025), arXiv:2510.11761 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Near horizon local instability and quantum thermality,

    Surojit Dalui and Bibhas Ranjan Majhi, “Near horizon local instability and quantum thermality,” Phys. Rev. D102, 124047 (2020), arXiv:2007.14312 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Influence through mixing: hotspots as benchmarks for basic black-hole behaviour,

    G. Kaplanek, C. P. Burgess, and R. Holman, “Influence through mixing: hotspots as benchmarks for basic black-hole behaviour,” JHEP09, 006 (2021), arXiv:2106.09854 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    What Hawking radiation looks like as you fall into a black hole,

    Christopher J. Shallue and Sean M. Carroll, “What Hawking radiation looks like as you fall into a black hole,” Phys. Rev. D112, 085013 (2025), arXiv:2501.06609 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Toward a self-consistent framework for measuring black hole ringdowns,

    Teagan A. Clarkeet al., “Toward a self-consistent framework for measuring black hole ringdowns,” Phys. Rev. D109, 124030 (2024), arXiv:2402.02819 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Black hole spectroscopy: status report,

    Gregorio Carullo, “Black hole spectroscopy: status report,” Gen. Rel. Grav.57, 76 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Massive vector field perturbations in the Schwarzschild background: stability and quasinormal spectrum

    R. A. Konoplya, “Massive vector field perturbations in the Schwarzschild background: Stability and unusual quasinormal spectrum,” Phys. Rev. D73, 024009 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0509026. 23

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  35. [35]

    Massive vector fields on the Schwarzschild spacetime: quasinormal modes and bound states

    Joao G. Rosa and Sam R. Dolan, “Massive vector fields on the Schwarzschild spacetime: quasi-normal modes and bound states,” Phys. Rev. D85, 044043 (2012), arXiv:1110.4494 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  36. [36]

    Quasinormal modes of Proca fields in a Schwarzschild- AdS spacetime,

    Tiago V. Fernandes, David Hilditch, Jos´ e P. S. Lemos, and Vitor Cardoso, “Quasinormal modes of Proca fields in a Schwarzschild- AdS spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D105, 044017 (2022), arXiv:2112.03282 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Superradiance -- the 2020 Edition

    Richard Brito, Vitor Cardoso, and Paolo Pani, “Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,” Lect. Notes Phys.906, pp.1–237 (2015), arXiv:1501.06570 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors

    Masha Baryakhtar, Robert Lasenby, and Mae Teo, “Black Hole Superradiance Signatures of Ultralight Vectors,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 035019 (2017), arXiv:1704.05081 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Cavities in curved spacetimes: the response of particle detectors

    Aida Ahmadzadegan, Eduardo Martin-Martinez, and Robert B. Mann, “Cavities in curved spacetimes: the response of particle detectors,” Phys. Rev. D89, 024013 (2014), arXiv:1310.5097 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [40]

    On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory

    Karl Schwarzschild, “On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. )1916, 189–196 (1916), arXiv:physics/9905030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1916

  41. [41]

    Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes(Oxford University Press, 1985)

    work page 1985

  42. [42]

    Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,

    Tullio Regge and John A. Wheeler, “Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity,” Phys. Rev.108, 1063–1069 (1957)

    work page 1957

  43. [43]

    Exact Solutions of Regge-Wheeler Equation

    Plamen P. Fiziev, “Exact solutions of Regge-Wheeler equation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.66, 012016 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  44. [44]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982)

    work page 1982

  45. [45]

    Vacuum Polarization in Schwarzschild Space-Time,

    P. Candelas, “Vacuum Polarization in Schwarzschild Space-Time,” Phys. Rev. D21, 2185–2202 (1980)

    work page 1980

  46. [46]

    Carroll,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity(Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    Sean M. Carroll,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity(Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Scully and M.S

    M.O. Scully and M.S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    work page 1997

  48. [48]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg,Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applications(Wiley, 1998)

    work page 1998

  49. [49]

    Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,

    Ryogo Kubo, “Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,” J. Phys. Soc. Jap.12, 570–586 (1957)

    work page 1957

  50. [50]

    Theory of many particle systems. 1

    Paul C. Martin and Julian S. Schwinger, “Theory of many particle systems. 1.” Phys. Rev.115, 1342–1373 (1959)

    work page 1959

  51. [51]

    Breuer and F

    H.P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  52. [52]

    On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups,

    Goran Lindblad, “On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigroups,” Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    work page 1976

  53. [53]

    Tong,Quantum Field Theory(CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2014)

    D. Tong,Quantum Field Theory(CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance,” Phys. Rev. D13, 2188–2203 (1976)

    work page 1976

  55. [55]

    Harvesting correlations in Schwarzschild and collapsing shell spacetimes,

    Erickson Tjoa and Robert B. Mann, “Harvesting correlations in Schwarzschild and collapsing shell spacetimes,” JHEP08, 155 (2020), arXiv:2007.02955 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    The Four laws of black hole mechanics,

    James M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The Four laws of black hole mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys.31, 161–170 (1973)

    work page 1973