arxiv: 2512.10870 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-11 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Structure of Chern-Simons Graviton Scattering Amplitudes from Topological Graviton Equivalence Theorem and Double Copy

Hong-Xu Liu , Zi-Xuan Yi , Hong-Jian He

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 23:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph

keywords topologically massive gravityChern-Simons gravitygraviton scattering amplitudesequivalence theoremdouble copyenergy cancellationsWeyl transformationBRST quantization

0 comments

The pith

A topological graviton equivalence theorem links high-energy massive graviton scattering amplitudes to dilaton amplitudes and explains their energy cancellations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper formulates a Weyl-transformed version of topologically massive gravity that introduces an unphysical dilaton while preserving the original theory in the unitary gauge. It establishes the Topological Graviton Equivalence Theorem, which equates the high-energy limits of physical graviton scattering amplitudes to the corresponding dilaton amplitudes. This equivalence supplies a general mechanism that forces large cancellations in the energy growth of any N-point massive graviton amplitude. The authors prove the cancellations reach powers proportional to 5N/2 in Landau gauge and 7N/2 in unitary gauge, compute the four-point case explicitly, and construct the amplitudes via double copy from topologically massive Yang-Mills theory. The result clarifies how the Chern-Simons term controls high-energy behavior in three-dimensional gravity.

Core claim

In the Weyl-transformed topologically massive gravity theory the Topological Graviton Equivalence Theorem states that each physical graviton scattering amplitude equals the corresponding dilaton amplitude in the high-energy limit. The theorem follows from conservation of physical degrees of freedom under the massless limit, where the massive graviton becomes an unphysical massless graviton and its degrees of freedom are transferred to the dilaton. This guarantees that N-point massive graviton amplitudes (N greater than or equal to 4) exhibit energy cancellations of order E to the power of 5N/2 in Landau gauge and 7N/2 in unitary gauge. Explicit four-point calculations confirm the reductions,

What carries the argument

The Topological Graviton Equivalence Theorem (TGRET), which maps each physical graviton scattering amplitude to the matching dilaton amplitude in the high-energy limit after Weyl transformation and BRST quantization of the theory.

If this is right

N-point massive graviton amplitudes with N greater than or equal to 4 cancel energy growth by E to the power 5N/2 in Landau gauge and 7N/2 in unitary gauge.
Four-graviton amplitudes cancel from E to the 11 to E to the 1 in Landau gauge and from E to the 12 to E to the 1 in unitary gauge.
Three- and four-point graviton and dilaton amplitudes in the theory are constructed directly from gauge-boson and adjoint-scalar amplitudes of topologically massive Yang-Mills theory via the extended massive double-copy.
The same cancellation mechanism applies to every massive graviton scattering process once the TGRET is invoked.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The double-copy construction may extend to higher-point amplitudes or to other three-dimensional theories containing Chern-Simons terms.
The observed cancellations could simplify unitarity checks or loop calculations in topologically massive gravity.
Direct numerical or analytic verification of a five-point amplitude would provide an immediate test of the general power-law claim.

Load-bearing premise

The Weyl-transformed TMG theory conserves the physical degrees of freedom in the massless limit, converting the physical massive graviton into an unphysical massless graviton whose degrees of freedom become those of the dilaton.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the high-energy limit of any four-point or higher massive graviton scattering amplitude that fails to match the corresponding dilaton amplitude or violates the predicted power-law energy cancellation would falsify the TGRET.

read the original abstract

Gravitons naturally acquire topological masses in the 3d topologically massive gravity (TMG) theory that includes the gravitational Chern-Simons term. We present a Weyl-transformed TMG (WTMG) formulation by introducing an unphysical dilaton field through the Weyl transformation. We perform the BRST quantization of the WTMG, which reduces to the conventional TMG in the unitary gauge. We demonstrate that this WTMG theory conserves the physical degrees of freedom (DoF) in the massless limit, under which the physical massive graviton becomes an unphysical massless graviton and its physical DoF is converted to the massless dilaton. With these, we newly establish a Topological Graviton Equivalence Theorem (TGRET), which connects each scattering amplitude of physical gravitons to the corresponding dilaton scattering amplitude in the high energy limit. The TGRET provides a general mechanism to guarantee all the large energy cancellations in any massive graviton scattering amplitudes. Applying the TGRET and using the generalized gravitational power counting rule, we prove that the $N$-point massive graviton amplitudes ($N\!\!\geqq\!4$) have striking energy cancellations by powers proportional to $\frac{5}{2}N$ ($\frac{7}{2}N$) in the Landau (unitary) gauge. For four graviton scattering amplitudes, this explains their large energy cancellations of $E^{11}\to E^1$ (Landau gauge) and $E^{12}\to E^1$ (unitary gauge). We compute the four-point graviton (dilaton) amplitudes and explicitly demonstrate the TGRET and these large energy cancellations. With the extended massive double-copy approach, we systematically construct the three- and four-point graviton (dilaton) scattering amplitudes in the WTMG theory from the corresponding gauge boson (adjoint scalar) amplitudes in the topologically massive Yang-Mills theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The TGRET links high-energy massive graviton amplitudes to dilaton ones in 3d WTMG, explaining the E^11 to E^1 cancellations via explicit four-point checks and double copy, but the whole construction rests on DoF conservation in the massless limit.

read the letter

The main thing here is the Topological Graviton Equivalence Theorem. It says that in the high-energy limit, the scattering amplitudes for physical massive gravitons in this Weyl-transformed topologically massive gravity match the corresponding dilaton amplitudes. This gives a systematic reason for the strong energy cancellations that appear in the N-point functions, down by powers like 5/2 N or 7/2 N depending on the gauge. They demonstrate this for the four-point case with explicit computations in both Landau and unitary gauges, showing the amplitude behavior dropping to E^1. The double-copy construction from the topologically massive Yang-Mills theory also lets them build the three- and four-point results from the gauge theory side, which is a solid way to generate them. The calculations look reproducible in principle since they give the explicit forms. The power counting rule they generalize seems to hold up for the cancellations they claim. The potential issue is the starting assumption that the theory conserves physical degrees of freedom in the massless limit, where the massive graviton turns unphysical and transfers its DoF to the dilaton via the Weyl rescaling. The BRST quantization is said to recover the unitary gauge TMG, but the details of how the constraints enforce the unphysical nature of the massless graviton mode need to be solid. Any slip there would affect whether the equivalence really captures all the cancellations. This paper is for people working on amplitudes in lower-dimensional gravity and double-copy methods. It offers concrete results that a specialist could check and build on. I would send it for peer review. The explicit four-point work gives referees something to verify, and the general theorem is worth testing even if the DoF part requires extra attention.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a Weyl-transformed topologically massive gravity (WTMG) by adding an unphysical dilaton via Weyl rescaling, performs BRST quantization reducing to unitary-gauge TMG, asserts conservation of physical DoF in the massless limit (massive graviton becomes unphysical massless graviton with DoF transferred to dilaton), establishes the Topological Graviton Equivalence Theorem (TGRET) equating high-energy physical graviton amplitudes to dilaton amplitudes, uses this plus power counting to prove N-point energy cancellations (powers ~5/2 N in Landau gauge, 7/2 N in unitary), explicitly demonstrates for four-point cases, and constructs three- and four-point amplitudes via extended massive double copy from topologically massive Yang-Mills.

Significance. If the TGRET holds with the claimed DoF mapping, the work supplies a general mechanism guaranteeing high-energy cancellations in 3d Chern-Simons graviton amplitudes and extends double-copy constructions to the massive topological case, offering a concrete handle on amplitude structure in topological gravity.

major comments (1)

[TGRET derivation and massless-limit discussion] The central TGRET derivation rests on the assertion that WTMG conserves physical DoF in the m→0 limit, converting the physical massive graviton to an unphysical massless graviton whose DoF are transferred to the dilaton. The manuscript provides no explicit constraint analysis, BRST cohomology computation, or propagator structure confirming the spectrum and unphysical character of the massless graviton mode; without this verification the equivalence and the claimed E^{11}→E^1 / E^{12}→E^1 cancellations for four-point amplitudes remain unanchored.

minor comments (1)

Notation for the unphysical dilaton and its status after Weyl rescaling could be introduced more explicitly in the opening sections to avoid ambiguity when reading the BRST quantization step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested explicit verifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [TGRET derivation and massless-limit discussion] The central TGRET derivation rests on the assertion that WTMG conserves physical DoF in the m→0 limit, converting the physical massive graviton to an unphysical massless graviton whose DoF are transferred to the dilaton. The manuscript provides no explicit constraint analysis, BRST cohomology computation, or propagator structure confirming the spectrum and unphysical character of the massless graviton mode; without this verification the equivalence and the claimed E^{11}→E^1 / E^{12}→E^1 cancellations for four-point amplitudes remain unanchored.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript states that BRST quantization of WTMG reduces to unitary-gauge TMG and demonstrates conservation of physical DoF in the m→0 limit, with the physical massive graviton becoming unphysical and its DoF transferred to the dilaton. To strengthen the anchoring of the TGRET and the subsequent power-counting arguments for the energy cancellations, we will add a new subsection in the revised version that supplies: (i) the full constraint analysis of the WTMG Lagrangian, (ii) the BRST cohomology computation confirming the physical spectrum, and (iii) the explicit propagator structure in the massless limit that isolates the unphysical massless graviton mode. These additions will make the DoF mapping and the TGRET derivation fully explicit while leaving the four-point amplitude results and double-copy constructions unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

TGRET derived from explicit WTMG DoF conservation without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper constructs WTMG via Weyl transformation, performs BRST quantization showing reduction to unitary-gauge TMG, and demonstrates DoF conservation in the m→0 limit (massive graviton mode becomes unphysical massless graviton with DoF transferred to dilaton). The TGRET is then stated as following directly from these properties to equate high-energy graviton amplitudes to dilaton amplitudes. No equations reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-definition by construction; no load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are used. The energy-cancellation proofs rely on the stated equivalence plus generalized power counting, which are independent of the target result. This is a standard self-contained theoretical derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the introduction of the unphysical dilaton via Weyl transformation and the conservation of physical degrees of freedom in the massless limit, both treated as domain assumptions of the theory setup.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The WTMG theory conserves the physical degrees of freedom in the massless limit, converting the massive graviton DoF to the dilaton
Explicitly stated as demonstrated in the abstract and used as the basis for TGRET.
domain assumption BRST quantization of WTMG reduces to conventional TMG in the unitary gauge
Part of the quantization setup described in the abstract.

invented entities (1)

unphysical dilaton field no independent evidence
purpose: Introduced via Weyl transformation to formulate WTMG and enable the equivalence theorem
Auxiliary field that becomes physical in the massless limit to absorb DoF.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5672 in / 1488 out tokens · 37773 ms · 2026-05-16T23:13:18.423713+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

We demonstrate that this WTMG theory conserves the physical degrees of freedom (DoF) in the massless limit, under which the physical massive graviton becomes an unphysical massless graviton and its physical DoF is converted to the massless dilaton.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the TGRET provides a general mechanism to guarantee all the large energy cancellations in any massive graviton scattering amplitudes

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

[1]

Topologically Massive Gauge Theories

S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and S. Templeton, “Topologically Massive Gauge Theories”, Annals Phys. 140 (1982) 372-411 [Annals Phys. 185 (1988) 406(E)]

work page 1982
[2]

Three-Dimensional Massive Gauge Theories

S. Deser, R. Jackiw, and S. Templeton, “Three-Dimensional Massive Gauge Theories”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 975-978

work page 1982
[3]

Aspects of Chern-Simons Theory

For a review, G. V. Dunne, “Aspects of Chern-Simons Theory”, arXiv:hep-th/9902115

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[4]

Fractional Statistics

For a recent review, M. Greiter and F. Wilczek, “Fractional Statistics”, arXiv:2210.02530 [cond-mat.str-el]

work page arXiv
[5]

Characteristic Forms and Geometric Invariants

S. S. Chern and J. Simons, “Characteristic Forms and Geometric Invariants”, Annals of Mathematics 99 (1974) 48-69, no.1; S. S. Chern, “Complex Manifolds without Potential Theory”, second edition, Springer, Berlin, 1979

work page 1974
[7]

Topological insulators and superconductors

For a review, e.g., X. L. Qi and S. C. Zhang, “Topological insulators and superconductors”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 4, 1057-1110 [arXiv:1008.2026 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[8]

Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation

For a review, C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. DasSarma, “Non-Abelian Anyons and Topological Quantum Computation”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 1083-1159 [arXiv:0707.1889 [cond-mat.str-el]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[9]

Structure of Chern-Simons scattering amplitudes from topological equivalence theorem and double-copy,

Y.-F. Hang, H.-J. He, C. Shen, “Structure of Chern-Simons scattering amplitudes from topological equivalence theorem and double-copy,” JHEP 01 (2022) 153 [arXiv:2110.05399 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2022
[10]

Topological Equivalence Theorem and Double-Copy for Chern–Simons Scattering Amplitudes

Y.-F. Hang, H.-J. He, C. Shen, “Topological Equivalence Theorem and Double-Copy for Chern–Simons Scattering Amplitudes”, Research 6 (2023) 0072 [arXiv:2406.13671 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes

Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, H. Johansson, “New relations for gauge-theory amplitudes”, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 085011 [arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[12]

Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory

Z. Bern, J.J. M. Carrasco, H. Johansson, “Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 061602 [arXiv:1004.0476 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[13]

The Duality Between Color and Kinematics and its Applications,

For a review, Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson and R. Roiban, “The Duality Between Color and Kinematics and its Applications,” J. Phys. A57 (2024) 33, 333002 [arXiv:1909.01358 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons

F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321; P. W. Higgs, “Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508; “Broken Symmetries, Massless Particles and Gauge Fields”, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 132; G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen and T.W.B. Kibble, “Global Conserva...

work page 1964
[15]

Massive Double Copy in Three Spacetime Dimensions

M. C. Gonzalez, A. Momeni and J. Rumbutis, “Massive Double Copy in Three Spacetime Dimensions”, JHEP 08 (2021) 116 [arXiv:2107.00611 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Structure of Kaluza-Klein Graviton Scattering Amplitudes from Gravitational Equivalence Theorem and Double-Copy

Y.-F. Hang and H.-J. He, “Structure of Kaluza-Klein Graviton Scattering Amplitudes from Gravitational Equivalence Theorem and Double-Copy”, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 8, 084005 [arXiv:2106.04568 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

Gravitational Equivalence Theorem and Double-Copy for Kaluza-Klein Graviton Scattering Amplitudes

Y.-F. Hang and H.-J. He, “Gravitational Equivalence Theorem and Double-Copy for Kaluza-Klein Graviton Scattering Amplitudes”, Research 2022 (2022) 9860945 [arXiv:2207.11214 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

Scattering Amplitudes of Kaluza-Klein Strings and Extended Massive Double-Copy

Y. Li, Y.-F. Hang, H.-J. He, and S. He, “Scattering Amplitudes of Kaluza-Klein Strings and Extended Massive Double-Copy”, JHEP 02 (2022) 120 [arXiv:2111.12042 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2022
[19]

Massive Color-Kinematics Duality and Double-Copy for Kaluza-Klein Scattering Amplitudes

Y. Li, Y.-F. Hang, H.-J. He, “Massive Color-Kinematics Duality and Double-Copy for Kaluza-Klein Scattering Amplitudes”, JHEP 03 (2023) 254 [arXiv:2209.11191 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2023
[20]

Structure of Massive Gauge/Gravity Scattering Amplitudes, Equivalence Theorems, and Extended Double-Copy with Compactified Warped Space

Y. Hang, W.-W. Zhao, H.-J. He, Y.-L. Qiu, “Structure of Massive Gauge/Gravity Scattering Amplitudes, Equivalence Theorems, and Extended Double-Copy with Compactified Warped Space”, JHEP 02 (2025) 001 [arXiv:2406.12713 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Unitarity of Compactified Five Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory

R. S. Chivukula, D.A. Dicus, H.-J. He, “Unitarity of Five-Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory”, Phys. Lett. B 525 (2002) 175 [hep-ph/0111016]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[22]

Unitarity of the Higher Dimensional Standard Model

R. S. Chivukula and H.-J. He, “Unitarity of Deconstructed Five-Dimensional Yang-Mills Theory”, Phys. Lett. B 532 (2002) 121 [hep-ph/ 0201164]; R. S. Chivukula, D. A. Dicus, – 64 – H.-J. He, S. Nandi, “Unitarity of the Higher Dimensional Standard Model”, Phys. Lett. B 562 (2003) 109 [hep-ph/0302263]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[23]

H.-J. He, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20 (2005) 3362 [arXiv:hep-ph/0412113], (in its section3), and presentation at DPF-2004:Annual Meeting of the Division of Particles and Fields, American Physical Society, August 26-31, 2004, Riverside, California, USA

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[24]

Scattering in Mass-Deformed N>=4 Chern-Simons Models

A. Agarwal, N. Beisert and T. McLoughlin, “Scattering in Mass-DeformedN⩾4Chern- Simons Models,” JHEP 06 (2009) 045 [arXiv:0812.3367 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[25]

New Relations for Three-Dimensional Supersymmetric Scattering Amplitudes

T. Bargheer, Song He, and T. McLoughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 231601 [arXiv: 1203.0562 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[26]

Y. t. Huang and H. Johansson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 171601 [arXiv:1210.2255 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[27]

Scattering Amplitudes and the Double Copy in Topologically Massive Theories

N. Moynihan, “Scattering Amplitudes and the Double Copy in Topologically Massive Theories”, JHEP 12 (2020) 163 [arXiv:2006.15957 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2020
[28]

Anyons and the Double Copy

D. J. Burger, W. T. Emond and N. Moynihan, “Anyons and the Double Copy”, JHEP 01 (2022) 017 [arXiv:2103.10416 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Massive Covariant Colour-Kinematics in 3D

N. Moynihan, “Massive Covariant Colour-Kinematics in 3D”, JHEP 05 (2024) 310 [arXiv:2110.02209 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli Action

C. deRham and G. Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 044020 [arXiv:1007.0443 [hep-th]]; C. deRham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101 [arXiv: 1011.1232 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[31]

Momeni, J

A. Momeni, J. Rumbutis, and A. J. Tolley, JHEP 12 (2020) 030 [2004.07853 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

L. A. Johnson, C.R.T. Jones, and S. Paranjape, JHEP 02 (2021) 148 [arXiv:2004.12948 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021
[33]

Momeni, J

A. Momeni, J. Rumbutis, and A. J. Tolley, JHEP 08 (2021) 081 [arXiv:2012.09711 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021
[34]

Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect

D. Tong, “Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect”, arXiv:1606.06687 [hep-th], 2016

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[35]

Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism

C. Becchi, A. Rouet, and R. Stora, “Renormalization of the Abelian Higgs-Kibble Model”, Commun. Math. Phys. 42 (1975) 127; “Renormalization of Gauge Theories”, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 98 (1976) 287; I. V. Tyutin, “Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism”, Lebedev-75-39, arXiv:0812.0580 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1975
[36]

Relativistic Wave Equations for Anyons

R. Jackiw and V. P. Nair, “Relativistic Wave Equations for Anyons”, Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 1933-1942

work page 1991
[37]

(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System

E. Witten, “(2+1)-Dimensional Gravity as an Exactly Soluble System”, Nucl. Phys. B311 (1988) 46

work page 1988
[38]

Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited

E. Witten, “Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited”, arXiv:0706.3359 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[39]

Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions

S. Carlip, “Quantum Gravity in 2+1 Dimensions”, Cambridge University Press, 1998

work page 1998
[40]

Is topological massive gravity renormalizable?

S. Deser and Z. Yang, “Is topological massive gravity renormalizable?”, Class. Quant. Grav. 7 (1990) 1603

work page 1990
[41]

On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field

M. Fierz and W. Pauli, “On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A173 (1939) 211-232

work page 1939
[42]

On Relativistic Field Equations of Particles With Arbitrary Spin in an Electromagnetic Field

W. Pauli and M. Fierz, “On Relativistic Field Equations of Particles With Arbitrary Spin in an Electromagnetic Field”, Helv. Phys. Acta 12 (1939) 297-300. – 65 –

work page 1939
[43]

Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity

K. Hinterbichler, “Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671 [arXiv:1105.3735 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[44]

Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,

N. Arkani-Hamed, T. C. Huang and Y. t. Huang, “Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins,” JHEP11, 070 (2021) [arXiv:1709.04891 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021
[45]

Double Copy Relations in Massive Theories

J. Rumbutis, “Double Copy Relations in Massive Theories”, PhD thesis, Imperial College London, https://doi.org/10.25560/99413

work page doi:10.25560/99413
[46]

Massive and massless Yang-Mills and gravitational fields

H. vanDam and M.J.G. Veltman, “Massive and massless Yang-Mills and gravitational fields”, Nucl. Phys. B22 (1970) 397

work page 1970
[47]

Linearized gravitation theory and the graviton mass

V. I. Zakharov, “Linearized gravitation theory and the graviton mass”, JETP Letters (Sov. Phys.) 12 (1970) 312

work page 1970
[48]

Further Investigation on the Precise Formulation of Equivalence Theorem

H. J. He, Y.P. Kuang and X. Li, “Further Investigation on the Precise Formulation of Equivalence Theorem”, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4842; “On the Precise Formulation of Equivalence Theorem”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 2619

work page 1994
[49]

Global Analysis for Probing Electroweak Symmetry Breaking Mechanism at High Energy Colliders

For a review of the equivalence theorem (ET) and ET identity in the 4d SM, see: H. J. He, Y.P. Kuang and C. P. Yuan, arXiv:hep-ph/9704276 and DESY-97-056, in the proceedings of the workshop on “Physics at the TeV Energy Scale”, vol.72, p.119, 1996. See also, H. J. He and W. B. Kilgore, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 1515 [hep-ph/9609326]; H. J. He, Y.P. Kuang and...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[50]

Higgs Gravitational Interaction, Weak Boson Scattering, and Higgs Inflation in Jordan and Einstein Frames

J. Ren, Z.Z. Xianyu, H. J. He, “Higgs Gravitational Interaction, Weak Boson Scattering, and Higgs Inflation in Jordan and Einstein Frames”, JCAP 06 (2014) 032 [arXiv:1404.4627 [gr-qc]]; Z.Z. Xianyu, J. Ren, H. J. He, “Gravitational Interaction of Higgs Boson and Weak Boson Scattering”, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 096013 [arXiv:1305.0251]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[51]

The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton

F.L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, “The Standard Model Higgs Boson as the Inflaton”, Phys. Lett. B659 (2008) 703 [arXiv:0710.3755]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[52]

Higgs Inflation, Reheating and Gravitino Production in No-Scale Supersymmetric GUTs

E.g., J. Ellis, H. J. He, Z.Z. Xianyu, JCAP 1608 (2016) 068 [arXiv:1606.02202]; J. Ellis, H. J. He, and Z.Z. Xianyu, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 021302(R) [arXiv:1411.5537]; H. J. He and Z.Z. Xianyu, JCAP 1410 (2014) 019 [arXiv:1405.7331]; and JCAP 1410 (2014) 083 [arXiv: 1407.6993 [astro-ph.CO]]; S.f. Ge, H. J. He, J. Ren, Z.Z. Xianyu, Phys. Lett. B 757 (2016)...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[53]

H. J. He, J. Ren, and W. Yao, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 015003 [arXiv:1506.03302]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[54]

Phenomenological Lagrangians

Steven Weinberg, “Phenomenological Lagrangians”, Physica 96A (1979) 327, no.1-2

work page 1979
[55]

TikZ-Feynman: Feynman diagrams with TikZ

J. Ellis, “TikZ-Feynman: Feynman diagrams with TikZ,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 210 (2017) 103-123 [arXiv:1601.05437 [hep-ph]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[56]

The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String,

D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, “The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String,” Nucl. Phys. B291 (1987) 41-89

work page 1987
[57]

Exact Three Dimensional Black Holes in String Theory

G. T. Horowitz and D. L. Welch, “Exact three-dimensional black holes in string theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 328-331 [arXiv:hep-th/9302126 [hep-th]]. – 66 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993