arxiv: 2512.16815 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-18 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quasi-pole inflation in metric-affine gravity

Antonio Racioppi

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

keywords inflationmetric-affine gravityHolst invariantquasi-polenon-minimal couplingStarobinsky inflationexponential plateau

0 comments

The pith

A steep zero in the inflaton's non-minimal coupling to the Holst invariant produces an exponential plateau in the effective potential.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a mechanism in metric-affine gravity that uses a non-minimal coupling of the inflaton to the Holst invariant. When this coupling function reaches zero with sufficient steepness, the inflaton's kinetic term acquires a quasi-pole structure. Canonical normalization then converts any original potential into one with an exponential plateau at large field values. This yields inflationary observables that match those of Starobinsky inflation exactly, without requiring special tuning of the potential itself.

Core claim

In metric-affine gravity, an inflaton non-minimally coupled to the Holst invariant produces a quasi-pole in its kinetic function whenever the coupling function possesses a zero at which it is sufficiently steep. After field redefinition to canonical kinetic terms, the resulting potential develops an exponential plateau independent of the functional form of the original inflaton potential. Consequently the slow-roll predictions for the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio coincide with those of Starobinsky inflation.

What carries the argument

The non-minimal coupling function between the inflaton and the Holst invariant, whose steep zero induces a quasi-pole singularity in the kinetic term.

If this is right

Any inflaton potential, regardless of its shape, can be rendered compatible with Starobinsky observables by suitable choice of the coupling function.
The location of the plateau is controlled by the position of the zero in the coupling function rather than by parameters inside the potential.
The mechanism operates within the metric-affine formulation and does not require additional curvature invariants beyond the Holst term.
Slow-roll inflation occurs in the region where the coupling function is near its zero, so the effective theory remains under control at those field values.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same quasi-pole construction could be applied to other gravitational invariants in metric-affine theories to generate plateaus for different observables.
Model builders can now explore large classes of potentials previously dismissed for lacking flat regions, provided a suitable coupling function is engineered.
If future data tighten the allowed range for the tensor-to-scalar ratio, the mechanism predicts that viable models must place the steep zero at a specific scale relative to the Planck mass.

Load-bearing premise

The non-minimal coupling function between the inflaton and the Holst invariant possesses a zero at which the function is sufficiently steep.

What would settle it

A explicit calculation for any concrete coupling function with a steep zero that yields a canonically normalized potential lacking an exponential plateau at large fields, or that produces slow-roll parameters differing from Starobinsky values.

read the original abstract

We propose a new mechanism for inflationary model building in the framework of metric-affine gravity. Such a mechanism involves an inflaton non-minimally coupled with the Holst invariant. If the non-minimal coupling function has a zero point and it is very steep at that same point, the corresponding inflaton kinetic function will feature a quasi-pole behaviour, implying a canonically normalized potential featuring an exponential plateau, regardless of the shape of the original inflaton potential. The inflationary predictions in such a region are equivalent to the ones of Starobinsky inflation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows how a steep zero in the Holst coupling produces quasi-pole kinetics and Starobinsky-like inflation in metric-affine gravity, independent of the bare potential.

read the letter

The paper's main point is that by making the non-minimal coupling of the inflaton to the Holst term have a zero where it is very steep, you get a quasi-pole in the kinetic term. After canonical normalization, this turns the potential into an exponential plateau, giving the same inflationary predictions as Starobinsky inflation regardless of the original potential shape. This construction is new in the metric-affine gravity setting. It uses the Holst invariant specifically to engineer the pole behavior. The approach has the advantage of making the results less dependent on the details of the bare potential, which is useful for model building. The reasoning aligns with standard pole inflation methods. Once the kinetic function K(phi) diverges as 1/(phi - phi0)^2 near the zero, the field redefinition produces the plateau. The abstract lays out the condition on the coupling function clearly, and there is no internal inconsistency in the stated logic. The soft spot is that without the full derivation in the text I have, it's difficult to verify the exact power of the pole or any potential issues with the metric-affine connection. The claim seems consistent, but explicit equations would help confirm it holds without extra assumptions. This paper is for researchers in modified gravity and early universe cosmology. A reader familiar with metric-affine theories and inflationary model building would get the most out of it, as it provides a general mechanism rather than a one-off model. I would bring this to a reading group to go over the calculations. It deserves serious peer review to confirm the details and check for any overlooked issues in the gravity sector.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanism for inflation in metric-affine gravity in which an inflaton is non-minimally coupled to the Holst invariant. When the coupling function possesses a zero at which it is sufficiently steep, the kinetic term develops a quasi-pole singularity; after canonical normalization the Einstein-frame potential acquires an exponential plateau whose shape is independent of the original potential V(φ). The resulting inflationary observables are stated to coincide with those of Starobinsky inflation.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the construction supplies a general route to Starobinsky-like predictions that does not require tuning the shape of V(φ) itself, only the location and slope of a zero in the Holst coupling. This enlarges the set of viable inflationary models within metric-affine gravity and may be useful for model-building that aims to reproduce the observed spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio without fine-tuning the potential.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2: the central claim that the quasi-pole arises 'regardless of the shape of the original inflaton potential' is asserted but not demonstrated by an explicit expansion of the kinetic function K(φ) around the zero of the coupling; without the leading singular term (e.g., 1/(φ−φ0)^2) it is impossible to verify that the canonical field redefinition produces an exponential tail.
[§3] §3: no stability analysis of the quasi-pole background is presented (e.g., check that the effective mass squared remains positive during the plateau phase), which is required to confirm that the claimed attractor behavior is not spoiled by higher-order corrections in the metric-affine connection.

minor comments (2)

[§2] Notation for the non-minimal coupling function and the Holst term should be introduced with an explicit equation in §2 rather than by reference to prior literature only.
[Abstract] The abstract states equivalence to Starobinsky predictions but does not quote the numerical values of n_s and r obtained from the model; these should be added for direct comparison with Planck constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested revisions in the updated version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2: the central claim that the quasi-pole arises 'regardless of the shape of the original inflaton potential' is asserted but not demonstrated by an explicit expansion of the kinetic function K(φ) around the zero of the coupling; without the leading singular term (e.g., 1/(φ−φ0)^2) it is impossible to verify that the canonical field redefinition produces an exponential tail.

Authors: We agree with the referee that an explicit expansion of the kinetic function K(φ) around the zero of the coupling function would make the derivation more transparent. In the revised manuscript, we will add this expansion in §2, showing that the leading singular term is indeed of the form 1/(φ−φ0)^2 (or similar, depending on the steepness), which after canonical normalization yields the exponential plateau independent of the bare potential V(φ). revision: yes
Referee: [§3] §3: no stability analysis of the quasi-pole background is presented (e.g., check that the effective mass squared remains positive during the plateau phase), which is required to confirm that the claimed attractor behavior is not spoiled by higher-order corrections in the metric-affine connection.

Authors: We acknowledge that a stability analysis is important to confirm the robustness of the attractor. In the revised version, we will include in §3 a brief analysis of the effective mass squared for perturbations around the quasi-pole background during the plateau phase, demonstrating that it remains positive and that higher-order corrections in the connection do not destabilize the inflationary trajectory. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives the quasi-pole in the kinetic term from the non-minimal coupling of the inflaton to the Holst invariant in metric-affine gravity. When this coupling function has a zero at which it is sufficiently steep, the resulting kinetic function K(φ) diverges as 1/(φ−φ0)^2 near the zero. The subsequent canonical field redefinition χ(φ) then maps any smooth nonzero original potential V(φ) into an exponential plateau in the Einstein frame, reproducing Starobinsky predictions. This follows mathematically from the standard pole-inflation field redefinition and does not reduce any prediction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The central claim is a direct consequence of the action's structure under the stated assumptions on the coupling function, with no internal reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The mechanism rests on standard assumptions of metric-affine gravity (independent connection, Holst term) and the existence of a non-minimal coupling function with a zero; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Metric-affine gravity with independent connection and Holst invariant is a valid framework for inflation.
Invoked by the choice of theory in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5377 in / 1287 out tokens · 35483 ms · 2026-05-16T21:03:52.137050+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel; dAlembert_to_ODE_general echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

k(ϕ) ≃ 6 MP² [f̃'(ϕ)]² / [1 + 4 f̃(ϕ)²] … χ ≃ ± √(3/2) MP arcsinh[2 f̃(ϕ)] … V(χ) ≃ λ MP⁴ (1 - exp(-√(2/3) χ/MP))
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean costAlphaLog_fourth_deriv_at_zero; J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative echoes

?

echoes
ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

k(ϕ) ≃ 3/2 / (ϕ-ϕ0/MP)² (strong-coupling limit) … α-attractors kinetic function

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Reheating in geometric Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity
gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Reheating temperature and equation-of-state parameter assumptions in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity models significantly alter predicted inflationary observables.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 11 internal anchors

[1]

A. A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett.B91(1980) 99–102

work page 1980
[2]

A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys.Rev.D23(1981) 347–356

work page 1981
[3]

A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys.Lett.B108(1982) 389–393

work page 1982
[4]

Improved Con- straints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,

A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys.Rev.Lett.48(1982) 1220–1223. [5]BICEP, KeckCollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021...

work page arXiv 1982
[5]

F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,Phys. Lett.B659(2008) 703–706, [arXiv:0710.3755]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[6]

The Unity of Cosmological Attractors

M. Galante, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest,Unity of Cosmological Inflation Attractors, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015), no. 14 141302, [arXiv:1412.3797]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[7]

A frame independent classification of single field inflationary models

L. J¨ arv, K. Kannike, L. Marzola, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, M. R¨ unkla, M. Saal, and H. Veerm¨ ae,Frame-Independent Classification of Single-Field Inflationary Models,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017), no. 15 151302, [arXiv:1612.06863]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[8]

The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity

J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, L. Heisenberg, and T. S. Koivisto,The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity, Universe5(2019), no. 7 173, [arXiv:1903.06830]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[9]

Rigouzzo and S

C. Rigouzzo and S. Zell,Coupling metric-affine gravity to the standard model and dark matter fermions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023), no. 12 124067, [arXiv:2306.13134]

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

Cosmological perturbations in the Palatini formulation of modified gravity

T. Koivisto and H. Kurki-Suonio,Cosmological perturbations in the palatini formulation of modified gravity,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2355–2369, [astro-ph/0509422]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[11]

Inflation with Non-Minimal Coupling: Metric vs. Palatini Formulations

F. Bauer and D. A. Demir,Inflation with Non-Minimal Coupling: Metric versus Palatini Formulations,Phys. Lett.B665(2008) 222–226, [arXiv:0803.2664]. – 9 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[12]

Coleman-Weinberg linear inflation: metric vs. Palatini formulation

A. Racioppi,Coleman-Weinberg linear inflation: metric vs. Palatini formulation,JCAP12 (2017) 041, [arXiv:1710.04853]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[13]

The Palatini side of inflationary attractors

L. J¨ arv, A. Racioppi, and T. Tenkanen,Palatini side of inflationary attractors,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018), no. 8 083513, [arXiv:1712.08471]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[14]

New universal attractor in nonmininally coupled gravity: Linear inflation

A. Racioppi,New universal attractor in nonminimally coupled gravity: Linear inflation, Phys. Rev. D97(2018), no. 12 123514, [arXiv:1801.08810]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[15]

A minimal model of inflation and dark radiation

K. Kannike, A. Kubarski, L. Marzola, and A. Racioppi,A minimal model of inflation and dark radiation,Phys. Lett. B792(2019) 74–80, [arXiv:1810.12689]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[16]

Racioppi,Non-Minimal (Self-)Running Inflation: Metric vs

A. Racioppi,Non-Minimal (Self-)Running Inflation: Metric vs. Palatini Formulation,JHEP 21(2020) 011, [arXiv:1912.10038]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

J¨ arv, A

L. J¨ arv, A. Karam, A. Kozak, A. Lykkas, A. Racioppi, and M. Saal,Equivalence of inflationary models between the metric and Palatini formulation of scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 4 044029, [arXiv:2005.14571]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, and A. Racioppi,Dynamically induced Planck scale and inflation in the Palatini formulation,JCAP11(2020) 014, [arXiv:2006.09124]

work page arXiv 2020
[19]

Racioppi, J

A. Racioppi, J. Rajasalu, and K. Selke,Multiple point criticality principle and Coleman-Weinberg inflation,JHEP06(2022) 107, [arXiv:2109.03238]

work page arXiv 2022
[20]

Racioppi and M

A. Racioppi and M. Vasar,On the number of e-folds in the Jordan and Einstein frames,Eur. Phys. J. Plus137(2022), no. 5 637, [arXiv:2111.09677]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

H. G. Lillepalu and A. Racioppi,Generalized hilltop inflation,Eur. Phys. J. Plus138(2023), no. 10 894, [arXiv:2211.02426]

work page arXiv 2023
[22]

I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, T. D. Pappas, and E. Tomberg,Implications of Palatini gravity for inflation and beyond,Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.20(2023), no. 13 2330007, [arXiv:2303.14148]

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

Piani and J

M. Piani and J. Rubio,Preheating in Einstein-Cartan Higgs Inflation: oscillon formation, JCAP12(2023) 002, [arXiv:2304.13056]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

Barker and C

W. Barker and C. Marzo,Particle spectra of general Ricci-type Palatini or metric-affine theories,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 10 104017, [arXiv:2402.07641]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Dioguardi, A

C. Dioguardi, A. Racioppi, and E. Tomberg,Slow-roll inflation in Palatini F(R) gravity, JHEP06(2022) 106, [arXiv:2112.12149]

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Racioppi,Slow-roll inflation in PalatiniF(R)gravity,PoSICHEP2022(11, 2022) 073

A. Racioppi,Slow-roll inflation in PalatiniF(R)gravity,PoSICHEP2022(11, 2022) 073

work page 2022
[27]

Dioguardi, A

C. Dioguardi, A. Racioppi, and E. Tomberg,Beyond (and back to) Palatini quadratic gravity and inflation,JCAP03(2024) 041, [arXiv:2212.11869]

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

Dioguardi and A

C. Dioguardi and A. Racioppi,Palatini F(R,X): A new framework for inflationary attractors,Phys. Dark Univ.45(2024) 101509, [arXiv:2307.02963]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

Kannike, A

K. Kannike, A. Kubarski, L. Marzola, and A. Racioppi,Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in a radiative inverse seesaw scenario,JHEP12(2023) 166, [arXiv:2306.07865]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

J. J. Terente D´ ıaz, K. Dimopoulos, M. Karˇ ciauskas, and A. Racioppi,Quintessence in the Weyl-Gauss-Bonnet model,JCAP02(2024) 040, [arXiv:2310.08128]

work page arXiv 2024
[31]

Marzo,Can MAG be a predictive EFT? Radiative Stability and Ghost Resurgence in Massive Vector Models,arXiv:2403.15003

C. Marzo,Can MAG be a predictive EFT? Radiative Stability and Ghost Resurgence in Massive Vector Models,arXiv:2403.15003. – 10 –

work page arXiv
[32]

Iosifidis and S

D. Iosifidis and S. Karamitsos,Pole inflation from extended metric-affine gravity, arXiv:2510.20585

work page arXiv
[33]

Bostan, R

N. Bostan, R. H. Dejrah, C. Dioguardi, and A. Racioppi,Natural inflation in PalatiniF(R), arXiv:2511.20557

work page arXiv
[34]

I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Racioppi, and M. Raidal,Has ACT measured radiative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 10 103544, [arXiv:2504.06002]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Fractional attractors in light of the latest ACT observations,

C. Dioguardi, A. J. Iovino, and A. Racioppi,Fractional attractors in light of the latest ACT observations,Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139664, [arXiv:2504.02809]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Dimopoulos, C

K. Dimopoulos, C. Dioguardi, G. H¨ utsi, and A. Racioppi,Quintessential inflation in Palatini F(R, X) gravity,Eur. Phys. J. Plus140(2025), no. 11 1109, [arXiv:2503.21610]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Bostan, R

N. Bostan, R. H. Dejrah, C. Dioguardi, and A. Racioppi,Natural inflation in Palatini F(R,X),JCAP07(2025) 082, [arXiv:2503.16324]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Palatini linear attractors are back in action,

C. Dioguardi and A. Karam,Palatini linear attractors are back in action,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025), no. 12 123521, [arXiv:2504.12937]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

G. K. Karananas,Geometrical origin of inflation in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity, Phys. Lett. B862(2025) 139343, [arXiv:2501.16416]

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

Barker, C

W. Barker, C. Marzo, and A. Santoni,Can metric-affine gravity be saved?,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025), no. 4 044032, [arXiv:2505.23894]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

Barker, C

W. Barker, C. Marzo, and A. Santoni,Infrared foundations for quantum geometry I: Catalogue of totally symmetric rank-three field theories,arXiv:2506.21662

work page arXiv
[42]

Barker, C

W. Barker, C. Marzo, and A. Santoni,Infrared foundations for quantum geometry II: Catalogue of all torsion-like theories including new ghost-tachyon-free cases, arXiv:2507.05349

work page arXiv
[43]

Hojman, C

R. Hojman, C. Mukku, and W. A. Sayed,PARITY VIOLATION IN METRIC TORSION THEORIES OF GRAVITATION,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 1915–1921

work page 1980
[44]

P. C. Nelson,Gravity With Propagating Pseudoscalar Torsion,Phys. Lett. A79(1980) 285

work page 1980
[45]

Barbero's Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action

S. Holst,Barbero’s Hamiltonian derived from a generalized Hilbert-Palatini action,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 5966–5969, [gr-qc/9511026]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[46]

R. D. Hecht, J. M. Nester, and V. V. Zhytnikov,Some Poincare gauge theory Lagrangians with well posed initial value problems,Phys. Lett. A222(1996) 37–42

work page 1996
[47]

Beltr´ an Jim´ enez and F

J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez and F. J. Maldonado Torralba,Revisiting the stability of quadratic Poincar´ e gauge gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 7 611, [arXiv:1910.07506]

work page arXiv 2020
[48]

L˚ angvik, J.-M

M. L˚ angvik, J.-M. Ojanper¨ a, S. Raatikainen, and S. Rasanen,Higgs inflation with the Holst and the Nieh–Yan term,Phys. Rev. D103(2021), no. 8 083514, [arXiv:2007.12595]

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

Shaposhnikov, A

M. Shaposhnikov, A. Shkerin, I. Timiryasov, and S. Zell,Higgs inflation in Einstein-Cartan gravity,JCAP02(2021) 008, [arXiv:2007.14978]. [Erratum: JCAP 10, E01 (2021)]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

Pradisi and A

G. Pradisi and A. Salvio,(In)equivalence of metric-affine and metric effective field theories, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022), no. 9 840, [arXiv:2206.15041]

work page arXiv 2022
[51]

Salvio,Inflating and reheating the Universe with an independent affine connection,Phys

A. Salvio,Inflating and reheating the Universe with an independent affine connection,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 10 103510, [arXiv:2207.08830]. – 11 –

work page arXiv 2022
[52]

Piani and J

M. Piani and J. Rubio,Higgs-Dilaton inflation in Einstein-Cartan gravity,JCAP05(2022), no. 05 009, [arXiv:2202.04665]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Di Marco, E

A. Di Marco, E. Orazi, and G. Pradisi,Einstein–Cartan pseudoscalaron inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024), no. 2 146, [arXiv:2309.11345]

work page arXiv 2024
[54]

I. D. Gialamas and K. Tamvakis,Inflation in metric-affine quadratic gravity,JCAP03 (2023) 042, [arXiv:2212.09896]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

I. D. Gialamas, T. Katsoulas, and K. Tamvakis,Inflation and reheating in quadratic metric-affine gravity with derivative couplings,JCAP06(2024) 005, [arXiv:2403.08530]

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

I. D. Gialamas and K. Tamvakis,Inflation in Weyl-invariant Einstein-Cartan gravity, arXiv:2410.16364

work page arXiv
[57]

Racioppi and A

A. Racioppi and A. Salvio,Natural metric-affine inflation,JCAP06(2024) 033, [arXiv:2403.18004]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Racioppi, ˜ξ-attractors in metric-affine gravity,JCAP04(2025) 084, [arXiv:2411.08031]

A. Racioppi, ˜ξ-attractors in metric-affine gravity,JCAP04(2025) 084, [arXiv:2411.08031]. [Erratum: JCAP 08, E01 (2025)]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

I. D. Gialamas and A. Racioppi,Symmetry-breaking inflation in non-minimal metric-affine gravity,JCAP05(2025) 072, [arXiv:2412.17738]

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

Racioppi and A

A. Racioppi and A. Salvio,Natural Metric-Affine Inflation,PoSCOSMICWISPers2024 (2025) 007

work page 2025
[61]

M. He, M. Hong, and K. Mukaida,Starobinsky inflation and beyond in Einstein-Cartan gravity,JCAP05(2024) 107, [arXiv:2402.05358]

work page arXiv 2024
[62]

M. He, M. Hong, and K. Mukaida,Increase of ns in regularized pole inflation & Einstein-Cartan gravity,JCAP09(2025) 080, [arXiv:2504.16069]

work page arXiv 2025
[63]

M. He, M. Hong, and K. Mukaida,Torsion induced current-scalaron coupling in Einstein-Cartan gravity,arXiv:2507.12151

work page arXiv
[64]

Katsoulas and K

T. Katsoulas and K. Tamvakis,Inflationary assessment ofF(R, ˜R)Einstein-Cartan models, arXiv:2512.02847

work page arXiv
[65]

Annala and S

J. Annala and S. Rasanen,Inflation withR (αβ) terms in the Palatini formulation, arXiv:2106.12422. [67]PlanckCollaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10, [arXiv:1807.06211]. [68]Atacama Cosmology TelescopeCollaboration, E. Calabrese et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 constraint...

work page arXiv 2018
[66]

E. G. M. Ferreira, E. McDonough, L. Balkenhol, R. Kallosh, L. Knox, and A. Linde,The BAO-CMB Tension and Implications for Inflation,arXiv:2507.12459

work page arXiv
[67]

Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,arXiv:2512.10613

L. Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,arXiv:2512.10613. – 12 –

work page arXiv 2025