pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.23556 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-29 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.IM· hep-ph· physics.ins-det

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The new generation lunar gravitational wave detectors: sky map resolution and joint analysis

Xiaolin Zhang , Chengye Yu , Haoran Li , Sobhan Kazempour , Mingqiu Li , Sichun Sun
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 19:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.IMhep-phphysics.ins-det
keywords lunar gravitational wave detectorsCIGOTCIGOangular resolutionFisher matrixTianQinLISAgravitational wave localization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lunar crater detector CIGO localizes gravitational wave sources better than TianQin or LISA above 0.1 Hz when noise is controlled.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses the Fisher-matrix method to assess the angular-resolution performance of the proposed Crater Interferometry Gravitational-wave Observatory (CIGO) on the lunar north pole crater rim, together with TianQin and LISA, for monochromatic sources between 0.1 and 10 Hz. It finds that CIGO outperforms the two space-based missions and dominates the combined network once lunar noise is mitigated in the 0.1-2.87 Hz interval. An upgraded four-station tetrahedral configuration called TCIGO is shown to deliver a five-fold gain in angular resolution over CIGO along with wider sky coverage across the band.

Core claim

Using the Fisher-matrix method, the authors demonstrate that above 0.1 Hz, CIGO achieves better localization accuracy than TianQin and LISA and dominates the performance of the combined detector network, provided lunar noise mitigation in the 0.1-2.87 Hz range. The tetrahedral configuration TCIGO yields a five-fold improvement in angular-resolution capability over CIGO and improves sky coverage across the target frequency band.

What carries the argument

Fisher-matrix calculation of angular-resolution performance for the three-station CIGO lunar crater-rim interferometer and its four-station tetrahedral upgrade TCIGO, applied to monochromatic sources in the 0.1-10 Hz band.

If this is right

  • Above 0.1 Hz, CIGO dominates localization accuracy in any joint analysis that includes TianQin and LISA.
  • TCIGO improves angular resolution by a factor of five relative to the baseline CIGO design.
  • TCIGO provides more uniform sky coverage across the 0.1-10 Hz band than the three-station CIGO layout.
  • Joint networks that incorporate CIGO or TCIGO achieve higher overall sky-map resolution than networks limited to space-based detectors alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If lunar noise mitigation succeeds, the 0.1-10 Hz window becomes accessible for high-resolution gravitational-wave observations that neither ground-based nor current space-based instruments cover well.
  • Tetrahedral lunar geometries could be adapted to other planetary surfaces or to future space-based arrays to gain similar resolution gains.
  • Improved localization from these detectors would tighten constraints on source parameters in multi-messenger follow-up campaigns.

Load-bearing premise

Lunar noise can be mitigated to levels that allow CIGO to outperform TianQin and LISA in the 0.1-2.87 Hz frequency range.

What would settle it

A direct measurement or simulation showing that actual lunar noise in the 0.1-2.87 Hz band exceeds the threshold required for CIGO to achieve better localization than TianQin and LISA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.23556 by Chengye Yu, Haoran Li, Mingqiu Li, Sichun Sun, Sobhan Kazempour, Xiaolin Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of CIGO’s orbit and coordinate system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The sky map of angular resolutions ∆Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Cumulative histograms of sky localization estimations ∆Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Noise level estimation of CIGO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Cumulative histograms of sky localization estimations ∆Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The sky map of angular resolutions ∆Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Cumulative histograms of sky localization estimations ∆Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Lunar-based gravitational-wave interferometry is a fascinating endeavor, and was proposed as a promising approach to bridge the observational gap between space-borne and ground-based detectors. In this work, we adopt the Fisher-matrix method to examine the angular-resolution performance of the newly proposed Crater Interferometry Gravitational-wave Observatory (CIGO) on the lunar crater rim near the north pole, together with TianQin and LISA, for monochromatic sources in the 0.1-10 Hz band. We find that above 0.1 Hz, CIGO achieves better localization accuracy than the other two space-based missions and dominates the combined detector network's performance, provided that lunar noise mitigation is achieved in the 0.1-2.87 Hz frequency range. We further explore an upgraded Tetrahedron configuration, TCIGO, with a fourth station at the bottom of a crater, which forms a regular tetrahedral constellation on the lunar surface. The result shows that TCIGO yields a five-fold improvement in angular-resolution capability over CIGO and gets better sky coverage across the target frequency band.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes lunar-based gravitational-wave detectors CIGO (Crater Interferometry Gravitational-wave Observatory) on a north-polar crater rim and its tetrahedral upgrade TCIGO, and applies the Fisher-matrix formalism to compute angular-resolution performance for monochromatic sources in the 0.1-10 Hz band in comparison and combination with TianQin and LISA. It reports that, conditional on lunar noise mitigation being achieved in the 0.1-2.87 Hz range, CIGO outperforms the two space-based missions above 0.1 Hz and dominates the joint network, while TCIGO yields a five-fold improvement in angular resolution together with improved sky coverage.

Significance. If the noise-mitigation assumption is substantiated and the Fisher-matrix results are validated with explicit derivations and error budgets, the work would establish a concrete performance advantage for lunar interferometry in bridging the frequency gap between space-borne and terrestrial detectors, with the tetrahedral geometry offering a quantifiable route to substantially better localization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims that CIGO achieves better localization than TianQin/LISA above 0.1 Hz and dominates the combined network are conditioned on lunar noise mitigation in the 0.1-2.87 Hz band, yet no explicit noise model (seismic, thermal, or otherwise), sensitivity-curve derivation, or feasibility reference is supplied to justify the strain sensitivity adopted in the Fisher matrix.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported localization accuracies and the five-fold angular-resolution gain for TCIGO are stated as results of a Fisher-matrix analysis, but the manuscript provides neither the explicit Fisher-matrix elements, the underlying waveform model, nor validation against known LISA-only cases, rendering the numerical ordering uncheckable.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract introduces CIGO and TCIGO as 'newly proposed' without citing earlier lunar GW concepts, which would help place the geometry choices in context.
  2. Notation for the detector arm lengths, orientations, and the precise definition of the tetrahedral constellation should be stated explicitly before the Fisher-matrix section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications and derivations in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claims that CIGO achieves better localization than TianQin/LISA above 0.1 Hz and dominates the combined network are conditioned on lunar noise mitigation in the 0.1-2.87 Hz band, yet no explicit noise model (seismic, thermal, or otherwise), sensitivity-curve derivation, or feasibility reference is supplied to justify the strain sensitivity adopted in the Fisher matrix.

    Authors: We agree that the noise-mitigation assumption requires explicit substantiation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that specifies the dominant post-mitigation noise sources (seismic, thermal, and others), derives the strain sensitivity curve with error budgets, and supplies references to existing lunar-environment feasibility studies. This will directly justify the sensitivity curve used in the Fisher-matrix analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the reported localization accuracies and the five-fold angular-resolution gain for TCIGO are stated as results of a Fisher-matrix analysis, but the manuscript provides neither the explicit Fisher-matrix elements, the underlying waveform model, nor validation against known LISA-only cases, rendering the numerical ordering uncheckable.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the explicit Fisher-matrix elements and waveform model were not presented in sufficient detail. The revised manuscript will include an appendix containing the full Fisher information matrix for the detector network, the monochromatic waveform model (with explicit amplitude and phase expressions in the 0.1–10 Hz band), and a validation test that reproduces published LISA-only localization results to confirm the numerical ordering and the reported improvement factors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies the standard Fisher-matrix formalism to the proposed CIGO and TCIGO geometries, computing localization ellipses from detector response functions, arm lengths, and input noise spectra as independent quantities. The resulting angular-resolution claims are outputs of this calculation rather than redefinitions of the inputs, with no self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work. The explicit conditioning on lunar noise mitigation is an external feasibility assumption, not a reduction of the derivation to itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

Central claims rest on the applicability of the Fisher matrix to monochromatic sources in the presence of lunar noise and on the feasibility of noise mitigation between 0.1-2.87 Hz; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Fisher matrix formalism accurately predicts angular resolution for monochromatic gravitational wave sources under Gaussian noise assumptions
    Standard tool in gravitational wave astronomy invoked for all performance calculations
invented entities (2)
  • CIGO no independent evidence
    purpose: Crater Interferometry Gravitational-wave Observatory on lunar crater rim
    Newly proposed detector geometry whose performance is calculated
  • TCIGO no independent evidence
    purpose: Tetrahedral configuration with fourth station at crater bottom
    Upgraded lunar detector geometry claimed to give five-fold resolution improvement

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1464 out tokens · 38231 ms · 2026-05-16T19:16:56.991945+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In this frame, each detector undergoes uniform circular motion around the polar axis

    Detector position in the lunar-centered frame We first consider a coordinate system centered at the Moon, with the polar axis aligned with the lunar rotation axis. In this frame, each detector undergoes uniform circular motion around the polar axis. The position vector of then-th detector is given by xn(t) =Rsinθ c cosα n(t), yn(t) =Rsinθ c sinα n(t), zn(...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Thez-axis is taken to be parallel to the lunar polar axis, while thex–yplane coincides with the lunar orbital plane

    Lunar orbital motion in the geocentric–lunar frame Next, we introduce a geocentric–lunar coordinate system with the Earth’s center as the origin. Thez-axis is taken to be parallel to the lunar polar axis, while thex–yplane coincides with the lunar orbital plane. 13 The orbital motion of the Moon around the Earth, expanded to second order in the orbital ec...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Earth’s orbital motion in the heliocentric–ecliptic frame We now return to the heliocentric–ecliptic coordinate system, in which the Sun is located at the origin and the x–yplane coincides with the ecliptic plane. The orbital motion of the Earth around the Sun is given by xEarth(t) =R E cosα E(t) + 1 2 e2RE [cos 2αE(t)−3]− 3 2 e2 2RE cosα E(t) sin2 αE(t),...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Rotation from the lunar orbital plane to the ecliptic plane To account for the inclination between the lunar orbital plane and the ecliptic plane, we introduce a rotation matrixR, R=   1 0 0 0 sinθ m cosθ m 0−cosθ m sinθ m   ,(A5) whereθ m is the inclination angle between the lunar and ecliptic planes

    work page

  5. [5]

    Total detector position in the heliocentric–ecliptic frame Finally, the trajectory of then-th detector in the heliocentric–ecliptic reference frame is obtained by summing the orbital coordinates as   Xn(t) Yn(t) Zn(t)   =R     xn(t) yn(t) zn(t)   +   xMoon(t) yMoon(t) zMoon(t)     +   xEarth(t) yEarth(t) zEarth(t)   .(A6) This is how f...

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Concepts and status of chinese space gravitational wave detection projects.Nature Astronomy, 5(9):881–889, 2021

    Yungui Gong, Jun Luo, and Bin Wang. Concepts and status of chinese space gravitational wave detection projects.Nature Astronomy, 5(9):881–889, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Gravitational-wave physics and astronomy in the 2020s and 2030s.Nature Reviews Physics, 3(5):344–366, 2021

    Matthew Bailes, Beverly K Berger, Peter R Brady, M Branchesi, Karsten Danzmann, M Evans, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, BR Iyer, T Kajita, S Katsanevas, et al. Gravitational-wave physics and astronomy in the 2020s and 2030s.Nature Reviews Physics, 3(5):344–366, 2021. 15

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    On networks of space-based gravitational-wave detectors.Fundamental Research, 4(5):1072–1085, 2024

    Rong-Gen Cai, Zong-Kuan Guo, Bin Hu, Chang Liu, Youjun Lu, Wei-Tou Ni, Wen-Hong Ruan, Naoki Seto, Gang Wang, and Yue-Liang Wu. On networks of space-based gravitational-wave detectors.Fundamental Research, 4(5):1072–1085, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Gw151226: observation of gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence.Physical review letters, 116(24):241103, 2016

    Benjamin P Abbott, Richard Abbott, Thomas D Abbott, Matthew R Abernathy, Fausto Acernese, Katherine Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, Rana X Adhikari, et al. Gw151226: observation of gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence.Physical review letters, 116(24):241103, 2016

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Gw170104: observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2.Physical review letters, 118(22):221101, 2017

    Benjamin P Abbott, Rich Abbott, Thomas D Abbott, Fausto Acernese, Kendall Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, Rana X Adhikari, Vaishali B Adya, et al. Gw170104: observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2.Physical review letters, 118(22):221101, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Gw170814: a three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence.Physical review letters, 119(14):141101, 2017

    Benjamin P Abbott, Richard Abbott, TD Abbott, F Acernese, K Ackley, C Adams, T Adams, P Addesso, Rana X Adhikari, Vaishali B Adya, et al. Gw170814: a three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence.Physical review letters, 119(14):141101, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state.Physical review letters, 121(16):161101, 2018

    Benjamin P Abbott, Richard Abbott, TD Abbott, F Acernese, K Ackley, C Adams, T Adams, P Addesso, Rana X Adhikari, Vaishali B Adya, et al. Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state.Physical review letters, 121(16):161101, 2018

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Gw170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Physical review letters, 119(16):161101, 2017

    Benjamin P Abbott, Rich Abbott, Thomas D Abbott, Fausto Acernese, Kendall Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, Rana X Adhikari, Vaishali B Adya, et al. Gw170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral.Physical review letters, 119(16):161101, 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Gwtc-1: a gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by ligo and virgo during the first and second observing runs.Physical Review X, 9(3):031040, 2019

    Benjamin P Abbott, Richard Abbott, TDea Abbott, S Abraham, F Acernese, K Ackley, C Adams, RX Adhikari, VB Adya, Christoph Affeldt, et al. Gwtc-1: a gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by ligo and virgo during the first and second observing runs.Physical Review X, 9(3):031040, 2019

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Ligo: the laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory.Reports on Progress in physics, 72(7): 076901, 2009

    Benjamin P Abbott, R Abbott, R Adhikari, P Ajith, Bruce Allen, G Allen, RS Amin, SB Anderson, WG Anderson, MA Arain, et al. Ligo: the laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory.Reports on Progress in physics, 72(7): 076901, 2009

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Physical review letters, 116(6):061102, 2016

    Benjamin P Abbott, Richard Abbott, Thomas D Abbott, Matthew R Abernathy, Fausto Acernese, Kendall Ackley, Carl Adams, Thomas Adams, Paolo Addesso, Rana X Adhikari, et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger.Physical review letters, 116(6):061102, 2016

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, Heather Audley, Stanislav Babak, John Baker, Enrico Barausse, Peter Bender, Emanuele Berti, Pierre Binetruy, Michael Born, Daniele Bortoluzzi, et al. Laser interferometer space antenna.arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.00786, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    Summary of the laser interferometer space antenna (lisa) mission.https://sci.esa.int/web/ lisa/-/31380-summary, 2025

    European Space Agency. Summary of the laser interferometer space antenna (lisa) mission.https://sci.esa.int/web/ lisa/-/31380-summary, 2025. ESA Science and Technology Summary

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Tianqin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33(3):035010, 2016

    Jun Luo, Li-Sheng Chen, Hui-Zong Duan, Yun-Gui Gong, Shoucun Hu, Jianghui Ji, Qi Liu, Jianwei Mei, Vadim Milyukov, Mikhail Sazhin, et al. Tianqin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33(3):035010, 2016

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Progress of the tianqin project.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 42(17):173001, 2025

    Jun Luo, Shaojun Bai, Yanzheng Bai, Lin Cai, Hao Dang, Qijia Dong, Hui-Zong Duan, Yuanbo Du, Lei Fan, Xinju Fu, et al. Progress of the tianqin project.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 42(17):173001, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    The taiji program in space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, 2017

    Wen-Rui Hu and Yue-Liang Wu. The taiji program in space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity, 2017

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    The taiji program: A concise overview.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5):05A108, 2021

    Ziren Luo, Yan Wang, Yueliang Wu, Wenrui Hu, and Gang Jin. The taiji program: A concise overview.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5):05A108, 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Gravitational waves: Classification, methods of detection, sensitivities and sources.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 24(14):1530031, 2015

    Kazuaki Kuroda, Wei-Tou Ni, and Wei-Ping Pan. Gravitational waves: Classification, methods of detection, sensitivities and sources.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 24(14):1530031, 2015

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Mid-frequency gravitational waves (0.1-10 hz): Sources and detection methods summary of the parallel session gw2 of mg16 meeting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09715, 2021

    Dongfeng Gao, Wei-Tou Ni, Jin Wang, Ming-Sheng Zhan, and Lin Zhou. Mid-frequency gravitational waves (0.1-10 hz): Sources and detection methods summary of the parallel session gw2 of mg16 meeting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09715, 2021

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Parameter estimation precision with geocentric gravita- tional wave interferometers: Monochromatic signals.Universe, 11(4):122, 2025

    Manoel Felipe Sousa, Tabata Aira Ferreira, and Massimo Tinto. Parameter estimation precision with geocentric gravita- tional wave interferometers: Monochromatic signals.Universe, 11(4):122, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Sky localization of space-based detectors with time-delay interferometry

    Tong Jiang, Yungui Gong, and Xuchen Lu. Sky localization of space-based detectors with time-delay interferometry. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2024(10):067, 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Neutrino and gravitational wave signal of a delayed-detonation model of type ia supernovae.Physical Review D, 92(12): 124013, 2015

    Ivo R Seitenzahl, Matthias Herzog, Ashley J Ruiter, Kai Marquardt, Sebastian T Ohlmann, and Friedrich K R¨ opke. Neutrino and gravitational wave signal of a delayed-detonation model of type ia supernovae.Physical Review D, 92(12): 124013, 2015

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    The missing link in gravitational-wave astronomy: discoveries waiting in the decihertz range.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37(21):215011, 2020

    Manuel Arca Sedda, Christopher PL Berry, Karan Jani, Pau Amaro-Seoane, Pierre Auclair, Jonathon Baird, Tessa Baker, Emanuele Berti, Katelyn Breivik, Adam Burrows, et al. The missing link in gravitational-wave astronomy: discoveries waiting in the decihertz range.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37(21):215011, 2020

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Detectability of intermediate-mass black holes in multiband gravitational wave astronomy.Nature Astronomy, 4(3):260–265, 2020

    Karan Jani, Deirdre Shoemaker, and Curt Cutler. Detectability of intermediate-mass black holes in multiband gravitational wave astronomy.Nature Astronomy, 4(3):260–265, 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Yao, X.-J

    Run-Min Yao, Xiao-Jun Bi, Peng-Fei Yin, and Qing-Guo Huang. Axion-like dark matter search with space-based gravita- tional wave detectors.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10083, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Distinguishing monochromatic signals in lisa and taiji: Ultralight dark matter versus gravitational waves.Physical Review D, 112(9):095021, 2025

    Heng-Tao Xu, Yue-Hui Yao, Yong Tang, and Yue-Liang Wu. Distinguishing monochromatic signals in lisa and taiji: Ultralight dark matter versus gravitational waves.Physical Review D, 112(9):095021, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Frequency modulation of gravitational waves by ultralight scalar dark matter.Physical Review D, 108(12):123531, 2023

    Ke Wang and Yin Zhong. Frequency modulation of gravitational waves by ultralight scalar dark matter.Physical Review D, 108(12):123531, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Gravitational signatures of axion dark matter 16 via parity-violating interactions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.12038, 2025

    Marco Figliolia, Francesco Grippa, Gaetano Lambiase, and Luca Visinelli. Gravitational signatures of axion dark matter 16 via parity-violating interactions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.12038, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Space gravitational-wave antennas decigo and b-decigo.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 28(12):1845001, 2019

    Seiji Kawamura, Takashi Nakamura, Masaki Ando, Naoki Seto, Tomotada Akutsu, Ikkoh Funaki, Kunihito Ioka, Nobuyuki Kanda, Isao Kawano, Mitsuru Musha, et al. Space gravitational-wave antennas decigo and b-decigo.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 28(12):1845001, 2019

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Current status of space gravitational wave antenna decigo and b-decigo

    Seiji Kawamura, Masaki Ando, Naoki Seto, Shuichi Sato, Mitsuru Musha, Isao Kawano, Jun’ichi Yokoyama, Takahiro Tanaka, Kunihito Ioka, Tomotada Akutsu, et al. Current status of space gravitational wave antenna decigo and b-decigo. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021(5):05A105, 2021

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Terrestrial very-long-baseline atom interferometry: Workshop summary

    Sven Abend, Baptiste Allard, Iv´ an Alonso, John Antoniadis, Henrique Ara´ ujo, Gianluigi Arduini, Aidan S Arnold, Tobias Asano, Nadja Augst, Leonardo Badurina, et al. Terrestrial very-long-baseline atom interferometry: Workshop summary. A VS quantum science, 6(2), 2024

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Beyond lisa: Exploring future gravitational wave missions.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 72(8):083005, 2005

    Jeff Crowder and Neil J Cornish. Beyond lisa: Exploring future gravitational wave missions.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 72(8):083005, 2005

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    Torsion-bar antenna: A ground-based mid-frequency and low-frequency gravitational wave detector.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 29(04):1940003, 2020

    Tomofumi Shimoda, Satoru Takano, Ching Pin Ooi, Naoki Aritomi, Yuta Michimura, Masaki Ando, and Ayaka Shoda. Torsion-bar antenna: A ground-based mid-frequency and low-frequency gravitational wave detector.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 29(04):1940003, 2020

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Aion: an atom interferometer observatory and network.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020(05): 011, 2020

    L Badurina, E Bentine, Diego Blas, K Bongs, D Bortoletto, T Bowcock, K Bridges, W Bowden, O Buchmueller, C Burrage, et al. Aion: an atom interferometer observatory and network.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020(05): 011, 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Zaiga: Zhaoshan long-baseline atom interferometer gravitation antenna.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 29:1940005, 2020

    Ming-Sheng Zhan, Jin Wang, Wei-Tou Ni, Dong-Feng Gao, Gang Wang, Ling-Xiang He, Run-Bing Li, Lin Zhou, Xi Chen, Jia-Qi Zhong, et al. Zaiga: Zhaoshan long-baseline atom interferometer gravitation antenna.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 29:1940005, 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Space Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy Beyond LISA

    John Baker, Simon F Barke, Peter L Bender, Emanuele Berti, Robert Caldwell, John W Conklin, Neil Cornish, Elizabeth C Ferrara, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Brittany Kamai, et al. Space based gravitational wave astronomy beyond lisa.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11305, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  42. [42]

    Lunar gravitational-wave detection.Space Science Reviews, 219(8):67, 2023

    Marica Branchesi, Maurizio Falanga, Jan Harms, Karan Jani, Stavros Katsanevas, Philippe Lognonn´ e, Francesca Badaracco, Luigi Cacciapuoti, Enrico Cappellaro, Simone Dell’Agnello, et al. Lunar gravitational-wave detection.Space Science Reviews, 219(8):67, 2023

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Lunar ligo: A new concept in gravitational wave astronomy

    Norman Lafave and Thomas L Wilson. Lunar ligo: A new concept in gravitational wave astronomy. InLunar and Planetary Inst., Twenty-Fourth Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Part 2: GM, 1993

    work page 1993

  44. [44]

    Opportunities and limits of lunar gravitational-wave detection, 2023

    Cozzumbo Andrea, Mestichelli Benedetta, Mirabile Marco, Paiella Lavinia, Tissino Jacopo, and Harms Jan. Opportunities and limits of lunar gravitational-wave detection, 2023

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Probing intermediate-mass black hole binaries with the lunar gravitational-wave antenna.npj Space Exploration, 1(1):2, 2025

    Hanlin Song, Han Yan, Yacheng Kang, Xian Chen, Junjie Zhao, and Lijing Shao. Probing intermediate-mass black hole binaries with the lunar gravitational-wave antenna.npj Space Exploration, 1(1):2, 2025

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Toward a consistent calculation of the lunar response to gravitational waves.Physical Review D, 109(6):064092, 2024

    Han Yan, Xian Chen, Jinhai Zhang, Fan Zhang, Mengyao Wang, and Lijing Shao. Toward a consistent calculation of the lunar response to gravitational waves.Physical Review D, 109(6):064092, 2024

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Gravitational-wave lunar observatory for cosmology.Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics, 2021(06):044, 2021

    Karan Jani and Abraham Loeb. Gravitational-wave lunar observatory for cosmology.Journal of Cosmology and Astropar- ticle Physics, 2021(06):044, 2021

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Janiet al., (2025), arXiv:2508.11631 [gr-qc]

    Karan Jani, Matthew Abernathy, Emanuele Berti, Valerio Boschi, Sukanya Chakrabarti, Alice Cocoros, John W Conklin, Teviet Creighton, Simone Dell’Agnello, Jean-Claude Diels, et al. Laser interferometer lunar antenna (lila): Advancing the us priorities in gravitational-wave and lunar science.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.11631, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Lunar gravitational-wave antenna.The Astrophysical Journal, 910(1):1, 2021

    Jan Harms, Filippo Ambrosino, Lorella Angelini, Valentina Braito, Marica Branchesi, Enzo Brocato, Enrico Cappellaro, Eugenio Coccia, Michael Coughlin, Roberto Della Ceca, et al. Lunar gravitational-wave antenna.The Astrophysical Journal, 910(1):1, 2021

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Ajithet al., JCAP2025(01), 108, arXiv:2404.09181 [gr-qc]

    Parameswaran Ajith, Pau Amaro Seoane, Manuel Arca Sedda, Riccardo Arcodia, Francesca Badaracco, Biswajit Banerjee, Enis Belgacem, Giovanni Benetti, Stefano Benetti, Alexey Bobrick, et al. The lunar gravitational-wave antenna: Mission studies and science case.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09181, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Vacuum measurements on the lunar surface.Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 9(1):450–456, 1972

    Francis S Johnson, James M Carroll, and Dallas E Evans. Vacuum measurements on the lunar surface.Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 9(1):450–456, 1972

    work page 1972

  52. [52]

    Seismic background limitation of lunar gravitational-wave detectors.Physical Review Letters, 129(7):071102, 2022

    Jan Harms. Seismic background limitation of lunar gravitational-wave detectors.Physical Review Letters, 129(7):071102, 2022

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Modeling of the lunar radiation environment.Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements, 166:169–183, 2007

    G De Angelis, FF Badavi, JM Clem, SR Blattnig, MS Clowdsley, JE Nealy, RK Tripathi, and JW Wilson. Modeling of the lunar radiation environment.Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements, 166:169–183, 2007

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    A permanent, asymmetric dust cloud around the moon.Nature, 522(7556):324–326, 2015

    M Hor´ anyi, JR Szalay, S Kempf, J Schmidt, E Gr¨ un, R Srama, and Z Sternovsky. A permanent, asymmetric dust cloud around the moon.Nature, 522(7556):324–326, 2015

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Lunar subsurface investigated from correlation of seismic noise

    Eric Larose, Michel Campillo, A Khan, and Y Nakamura. Lunar subsurface investigated from correlation of seismic noise. Geophysical Research Letters, 32:L16201, 2005

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    Moon meteoritic seismic hum: steady state prediction.Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 114(E12), 2009

    Philippe Lognonn´ e, Mathieu Le Feuvre, Catherine L Johnson, and Renee C Weber. Moon meteoritic seismic hum: steady state prediction.Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 114(E12), 2009

    work page 2009

  57. [57]

    Gravitational waves from phase transitions.Contemporary Physics, 65(2):75–96, 2024

    Djuna Lize Croon and David James Weir. Gravitational waves from phase transitions.Contemporary Physics, 65(2):75–96, 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Gravitational waves from cosmic strings after a first-order phase transition.Chinese Physics C, 46(4):043104, 2022

    Ruiyu Zhou and Ligong Bian. Gravitational waves from cosmic strings after a first-order phase transition.Chinese Physics C, 46(4):043104, 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Accuracy of estimation of parameters with lisa.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 83(8):083006, 2011

    Arkadiusz B laut. Accuracy of estimation of parameters with lisa.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 83(8):083006, 2011. 17

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Fundamentals of the orbit and response for tianqin.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35(9):095008, 2018

    Xin-Chun Hu, Xiao-Hong Li, Yan Wang, Wen-Fan Feng, Ming-Yue Zhou, Yi-Ming Hu, Shou-Cun Hu, Jian-Wei Mei, and Cheng-Gang Shao. Fundamentals of the orbit and response for tianqin.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35(9):095008, 2018

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Angular resolution of the lisa gravitational wave detector.Physical Review D, 57(12):7089, 1998

    Curt Cutler. Angular resolution of the lisa gravitational wave detector.Physical Review D, 57(12):7089, 1998

    work page 1998

  62. [62]

    Sky localization of space-based gravitational wave detectors.Physical Review D, 103(10):103013, 2021

    Chao Zhang, Yungui Gong, Hang Liu, Bin Wang, and Chunyu Zhang. Sky localization of space-based gravitational wave detectors.Physical Review D, 103(10):103013, 2021

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    Space missions to detect the cosmic gravitational-wave background.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 18(17):3473, 2001

    Neil J Cornish and Shane L Larson. Space missions to detect the cosmic gravitational-wave background.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 18(17):3473, 2001

    work page 2001

  64. [64]

    Source localizations with the network of space-based gravitational wave detectors.Physical Review D, 106(2):024004, 2022

    Chunyu Zhang, Yungui Gong, and Chao Zhang. Source localizations with the network of space-based gravitational wave detectors.Physical Review D, 106(2):024004, 2022

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    The construction and use of lisa sensitivity curves.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(10):105011, 2019

    Travis Robson, Neil J Cornish, and Chang Liu. The construction and use of lisa sensitivity curves.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(10):105011, 2019

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    Lisa sensitivity and snr calculations, 2021

    Babak Stanislav, Petiteau Antoine, and Hewitson Martin. Lisa sensitivity and snr calculations, 2021

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Detecting a stochastic gravitational wave background with the laser interferometer space antenna.Physical Review D, 65(2):022004, 2001

    Neil J Cornish. Detecting a stochastic gravitational wave background with the laser interferometer space antenna.Physical Review D, 65(2):022004, 2001

    work page 2001

  68. [68]

    Physics, astrophysics and cosmology with gravitational waves.Living reviews in relativity, 12(1):2, 2009

    Bangalore Suryanarayana Sathyaprakash and Bernard F Schutz. Physics, astrophysics and cosmology with gravitational waves.Living reviews in relativity, 12(1):2, 2009

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(1):015014, 2014

    Christopher J Moore, Robert H Cole, and Christopher PL Berry. Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(1):015014, 2014

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    pygwinc: Gravitational wave interferometer noise calculator, 2020

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration. pygwinc: Gravitational wave interferometer noise calculator, 2020. URLhttps://git. ligo.org/gwinc/pygwinc. Accessed: 2025-01-XX

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Cosmic explorer: A next-generation ground-based gravitational-wave observatory.Galaxies, 10(4):90, 2022

    Evan D Hall. Cosmic explorer: A next-generation ground-based gravitational-wave observatory.Galaxies, 10(4):90, 2022

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    Confusion noise level due to galactic and extragalactic binaries.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 14(6):1439, 1997

    Peter L Bender and Dieter Hils. Confusion noise level due to galactic and extragalactic binaries.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 14(6):1439, 1997

    work page 1997

  73. [73]

    Forward modeling of space-borne gravitational wave detectors

    Louis J Rubbo, Neil J Cornish, and Olivier Poujade. Forward modeling of space-borne gravitational wave detectors. Physical Review D, 69(8):082003, 2004

    work page 2004

  74. [74]

    Tetrahedron constellation of gravitational wave observatory.Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 68(2):220414, 2025

    Hong-Bo Jin and Cong-Feng Qiao. Tetrahedron constellation of gravitational wave observatory.Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 68(2):220414, 2025

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    Analytical analysis on the orbits of taiji spacecrafts.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06178, 2019

    Bofeng Wu, Chao-Guang Huang, and Cong-Feng Qiao. Analytical analysis on the orbits of taiji spacecrafts.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06178, 2019

    work page arXiv 1907