pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.00071 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-31 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Diagnosing Effective Metal-Insulator and Hawking-Page Transitions: A Mixed-State Entanglement Perspective in Einstein-Born-Infeld-Massive Gravity

Zhe Yang , Jian-Pin Wu , Peng Liu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords entanglement wedge cross-sectionmetal-insulator transitionHawking-Page transitionmassive gravityBorn-Infeld gravityholographic entanglementcritical exponentphase transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

In Einstein-Born-Infeld massive gravity, the entanglement wedge cross-section detects effective metal-insulator transitions more precisely than holographic entanglement entropy or mutual information, and all geometry quantities share a 1/3临

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines mixed-state entanglement measures in a gravitational model that produces both effective metal-insulator transitions and Hawking-Page transitions at finite temperature. It shows that the entanglement wedge cross-section has higher-order terms that track the critical point of the metal-insulator transition more closely than standard measures do. For Hawking-Page transitions the same measures reliably identify both first-order and second-order changes, with the cross-section behaving independently of subsystem configuration. The work also reports that every geometry-derived quantity exhibits the same critical exponent of 1/3 near second-order points. These results tie quantum-information diagnostics directly to the location and character of gravitational phase transitions.

Core claim

In Einstein-Born-Infeld massive gravity the entanglement wedge cross-section functions as a sensitive probe for both effective metal-insulator transitions and Hawking-Page transitions. Its higher-order corrections align closely with the critical temperature of the metal-insulator transition, outperforming holographic entanglement entropy and mutual information. All entanglement measures diagnose first-order and second-order Hawking-Page transitions, and every geometry-related quantity, including the cross-section, obeys a universal critical exponent of 1/3 near second-order points.

What carries the argument

The entanglement wedge cross-section, the minimal cross-sectional area of the bulk entanglement wedge between two boundary subsystems, which encodes mixed-state entanglement.

If this is right

  • Higher-order terms of the entanglement wedge cross-section track the critical point of effective metal-insulator transitions more closely than holographic entanglement entropy or mutual information.
  • The entanglement wedge cross-section diagnoses both first-order and second-order Hawking-Page transitions independently of the choice of boundary configuration.
  • All geometry-derived quantities, including entanglement measures, share a universal critical exponent of 1/3 near second-order phase transitions.
  • Mixed-state entanglement measures can serve as reliable diagnostics for phase structure in finite-temperature holographic models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same 1/3 exponent may appear in other holographic models with different matter content, offering a testable link between entanglement geometry and critical phenomena.
  • If the dual field theory maps onto a condensed-matter system, the enhanced sensitivity of the cross-section could guide searches for metal-insulator transitions in real materials.
  • Configuration independence of the cross-section suggests it could simplify numerical studies of phase transitions in more complicated bulk geometries.
  • The reported alignment of higher-order terms may motivate analytic expansions of entanglement measures beyond leading order in other gravitational settings.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen bulk geometry and boundary conditions in the Einstein-Born-Infeld massive gravity model correctly reproduce the effective metal-insulator and Hawking-Page transitions of the dual field theory.

What would settle it

A numerical computation of the critical exponent for the entanglement wedge cross-section or holographic entanglement entropy near a second-order transition point that yields a value other than exactly 1/3.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.00071 by Jian-Pin Wu, Peng Liu, Zhe Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Left panel: The red surface represents the HEE of the blue subregion with width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The illustration of MI, the subsystems [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: DC-conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Behavior of parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The behavior of parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Behavior of parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The relationship between the peak of the EWCS with configuration ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Phase diagram of temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: A special case of Hawking-Page phase transition in EN-BI massive gravity theory. Left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: HEE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: HEE [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Mutual information [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: EWCS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Scaling behavior of different entanglement measures, with slopes converging to 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study mixed-state entanglement measures in Einstein-Born-Infeld (EN-BI) massive gravity theory, a model exhibiting both Hawking-Page transitions and effective metal-insulator transitions (MIT) at finite temperatures. Our comprehensive investigation reveals that the entanglement wedge cross-section (EWCS), a novel mixed-state entanglement measure, demonstrates unique properties in detecting phase transitions. For effective MIT, we find the higher-order terms of EWCS align closely with the critical point, outperforming measures like holographic entanglement entropy (HEE) and mutual information (MI) in finite temperature systems. This enhanced sensitivity provides a more accurate tool for probing effective phase transitions in a finite temperature system. In Hawking-Page transitions, we observe that all entanglement measures effectively diagnose both first-order and second-order phase transitions, with EWCS showing configuration-independent behavior. Importantly, we discover that all geometry-related quantities, including entanglement measures, demonstrate a universal critical exponent of 1/3 near the second-order phase transition point, suggesting fundamental connections between quantum information theory and critical phenomena in gravitational systems. Our results highlight EWCS's potential as a powerful probe for phase transitions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines mixed-state entanglement measures—holographic entanglement entropy (HEE), mutual information (MI), and entanglement wedge cross-section (EWCS)—in Einstein-Born-Infeld massive gravity backgrounds that realize both Hawking-Page and effective metal-insulator transitions. It claims that EWCS higher-order terms track the effective MIT critical point more closely than HEE or MI, that all measures diagnose Hawking-Page transitions (with EWCS configuration-independent), and that all geometry-related quantities exhibit a universal critical exponent of 1/3 near the second-order Hawking-Page point.

Significance. If the numerical results are robust, the work positions EWCS as a potentially more sensitive diagnostic for effective phase transitions in finite-temperature holographic models than conventional entanglement measures. The reported universal exponent of 1/3 across geometric quantities near the second-order transition suggests possible deeper links between quantum-information observables and critical phenomena in gravity, which could motivate further analytic or model-independent studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (effective MIT results): the claim that EWCS higher-order terms align more closely with the critical point than HEE and MI requires a quantitative metric (e.g., relative deviation or percentage offset from the free-energy-determined critical temperature); without it, the superiority statement remains qualitative.
  2. [§5.3] §5.3 (Hawking-Page exponent): the universal critical exponent 1/3 is obtained by fitting numerical data; the manuscript must report the fitting interval in temperature, goodness-of-fit statistics, and checks that the exponent remains stable under small variations of the massive-gravity parameter and Born-Infeld coupling.
minor comments (3)
  1. Introduction: define 'effective metal-insulator transition' explicitly, including the order parameter or conductivity criterion used, to avoid ambiguity for readers outside the specific model.
  2. [§3] Figure captions and §3 (numerical procedure): state the convergence tolerance and grid resolution employed for minimal-surface and cross-section minimization so that the reported alignments can be reproduced.
  3. References: add citations to earlier holographic studies of EWCS near phase transitions for proper context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested quantitative details and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (effective MIT results): the claim that EWCS higher-order terms align more closely with the critical point than HEE and MI requires a quantitative metric (e.g., relative deviation or percentage offset from the free-energy-determined critical temperature); without it, the superiority statement remains qualitative.

    Authors: We agree that the original comparison was qualitative. In the revised manuscript we will introduce a quantitative metric consisting of the relative deviation |T_c^{measure} - T_c^{free}| / T_c^{free} for HEE, MI, and the higher-order EWCS terms, where T_c^{free} is fixed by the free-energy analysis. These deviations will be tabulated and discussed explicitly to demonstrate that the EWCS higher-order terms exhibit the smallest offset. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.3] §5.3 (Hawking-Page exponent): the universal critical exponent 1/3 is obtained by fitting numerical data; the manuscript must report the fitting interval in temperature, goodness-of-fit statistics, and checks that the exponent remains stable under small variations of the massive-gravity parameter and Born-Infeld coupling.

    Authors: We will expand §5.3 to specify the temperature interval (within 5 % of the critical temperature) used for the power-law fits, report the associated goodness-of-fit statistics (R² and χ² values), and include additional numerical checks showing that the fitted exponent remains stable to within 5 % when the massive-gravity parameter m and Born-Infeld parameter b are each varied by ±10 % around their fiducial values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper performs explicit numerical evaluation of holographic entanglement entropy, mutual information, and entanglement wedge cross-section on black-brane solutions of the Einstein-Born-Infeld massive gravity model. The metric ansatz, equations of motion, and boundary conditions are stated; minimal surfaces and cross-sections are located by standard numerical minimization. The reported critical exponent 1/3 is obtained by direct power-law fitting to the computed numerical data near the transition temperature, which itself is located independently via free-energy jump or order-parameter behavior. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no self-definitional loop appears, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked to justify the central claims. The computation is self-contained against the chosen geometry and numerical procedure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the AdS/CFT dictionary, the Ryu-Takayanagi prescription for holographic entanglement, and the existence of a bulk geometry that realizes both transitions; no new entities are postulated but several model parameters are adjusted to locate the critical points.

free parameters (1)
  • massive gravity parameter and Born-Infeld coupling
    Tuned to produce the effective MIT and Hawking-Page transitions at finite temperature.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence maps bulk gravity quantities to boundary field-theory observables
    Invoked to interpret entanglement measures as probes of dual condensed-matter transitions.
  • standard math Ryu-Takayanagi formula and its extensions to mixed-state measures (EWCS) hold in the given geometry
    Used without derivation to compute all reported entanglement quantities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1450 out tokens · 45990 ms · 2026-05-16T17:52:54.549615+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Entanglement in quantum information theory

    J. Eisert, “Entanglement in quantum information theory,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/0610253, 2006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  2. [2]

    Scaling of Entanglement close to a Quantum Phase Transitions

    A. Osterloh, L. Amico, G. Falci, R. Fazio, “Scaling of Entanglement close to a Quantum Phase Transitions” Nature416, 608 (2002) [arXiv:0202029 [quant-ph]]

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Entanglement in many-body systems

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh and V. Vedral, “Entanglement in many-body systems” Rev.Mod.Phys.80, 517 (2008) [arXiv:0703044 [quant-ph]]

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function

    Levin, Michael, and Xiao-Gang Wen. “Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function”. Physical review letters 96.11 (2006): 110405. 25

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Topological entanglement entropy

    Kitaev, Alexei, and John Preskill. “Topological entanglement entropy”. Physical review letters 96.11 (2006): 110404

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    A computable measure of entanglement

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, “Computable measure of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A65(2002), 032314 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314 [arXiv:quant-ph/0102117 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032314 2002

  7. [7]

    Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex,

    M. B. Plenio, “Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex,” Physical review letters, vol. 95, no. 9, p. 090503, 2005

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Quantum entanglement

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki and K. Horodecki, “Quantum entanglement,” Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009), 865-942 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865 [arXiv:quant-ph/0702225 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 2009

  9. [9]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,” Salamfest 1993:0284-296

    work page 1993

  10. [10]

    The World as a hologram

    L. Susskind, “The World as a hologram” J. Math. Phys.36, 6377 (1995)

    work page 1995

  11. [11]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.38, 1113 (1999) [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998)]

    work page 1999

  12. [12]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253 (1998)

    work page 1998

  13. [13]

    Holographic quantum matter

    S. A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev, “Holographic quantum matter,” [arXiv:1612.07324 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 181602 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Holographic entanglement entropy and the extended phase structure of STU black holes

    E. Caceres, P. H. Nguyen and J. F. Pedraza, JHEP09(2015), 184 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)184 [arXiv:1507.06069 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2015)184 2015

  16. [16]

    Holographic Entanglement Entropy in P-wave Superconductor Phase Transition

    R. G. Cai, S. He, L. Li and Y. L. Zhang, “Holographic Entanglement Entropy on P- wave Superconductor Phase Transition,” JHEP07(2012), 027 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)027 [arXiv:1204.5962 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)027 2012

  17. [17]

    Holographic entanglement entropy in general holographic superconductor models

    Y. Peng and Q. Pan, “Holographic entanglement entropy in general holographic superconductor models,” JHEP06(2014), 011 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)011 [arXiv:1404.1659 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2014)011 2014

  18. [18]

    Holographic entanglement entropy in superconductor phase transition with dark matter sector

    Y. Peng, “Holographic entanglement entropy in superconductor phase transition with dark matter sector,” Phys. Lett. B750(2015), 420-426 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.052 [arXiv:1507.07399 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.052 2015

  19. [19]

    Phase transition of holographic entanglement entropy in massive gravity

    X. X. Zeng, H. Zhang and L. F. Li, “Phase transition of holographic entanglement entropy in massive gravity,” Phys. Lett. B756(2016), 170-179 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.013 [arXiv:1511.00383 [gr-qc]]. 26

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.013 2016

  20. [20]

    Holographic Entanglement Entropy Close to Quantum Phase Transitions

    Y. Ling, P. Liu, C. Niu, J. P. Wu and Z. Y. Xian, “Holographic Entanglement Entropy Close to Quantum Phase Transitions,” JHEP04, 114 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)114 [arXiv:1502.03661 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2016)114 2016

  21. [21]

    The mixed-state entanglement in holo- graphic p-wave superconductor model,

    Z. Yang, F. J. Cheng, C. Niu, C. Y. Zhang and P. Liu, “The mixed-state entanglement in holo- graphic p-wave superconductor model,” JHEP04, 110 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)110 [arXiv:2301.13574 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2023)110 2023

  22. [22]

    Entanglement negativity and minimal entanglement wedge cross sections in holographic theories,

    J. Kudler-Flam and S. Ryu, “Entanglement negativity and minimal entanglement wedge cross sections in holographic theories,” Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.10, 106014 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.106014 [arXiv:1808.00446 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.106014 2019

  23. [23]

    Notes on entanglement wedge cross sections,

    N. Jokela and A. P¨ onni, “Notes on entanglement wedge cross sections,” JHEP07(2019), 087 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)087 [arXiv:1904.09582 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2019)087 2019

  24. [24]

    Some Aspects of Entanglement Wedge Cross-Section

    K. Babaei Velni, M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and M. H. Vahidinia, “Some Aspects of Entanglement Wedge Cross-Section,” JHEP05(2019), 200 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)200 [arXiv:1903.08490 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2019)200 2019

  25. [25]

    Holographic study of reflected entropy in anisotropic theories,

    M. J. Vasli, M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar, K. Babaei Velni and M. Sahraei, “Holographic study of reflected entropy in anisotropic theories,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.2, 026012 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.026012 [arXiv:2207.14169 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.026012 2023

  26. [26]

    Balanced partial entanglement and mixed state correlations,

    H. A. Camargo, P. Nandy, Q. Wen and H. Zhong, “Balanced partial entanglement and mixed state correlations,” SciPost Phys.12, no.4, 137 (2022) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.4.137 [arXiv:2201.13362 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.12.4.137 2022

  27. [27]

    A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, “A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section,” JHEP03(2021), 178 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)178 [arXiv:1905.00577 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2021)178 2021

  28. [28]

    Entanglement of Purification in Holographic Systems,

    P. Liu, Y. Ling, C. Niu and J. P. Wu, “Entanglement of Purification in Holographic Systems,” JHEP09, 071 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2019)071 [arXiv:1902.02243 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2019)071 2019

  29. [29]

    Mixed State Entanglement for Holographic Axion Model,

    Y. f. Huang, Z. j. Shi, C. Niu, C. y. Zhang andP. Liu,“Mixed State Entanglement for Holographic Axion Model,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, no.5, 426 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020- 7921-y [arXiv:1911.10977 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020- 2020

  30. [30]

    Mixed State Entanglement and Thermal Phase Transitions,

    P. Liu and J. P. Wu, “Mixed State Entanglement and Thermal Phase Transitions,” [arXiv:2009.01529 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2009

  31. [31]

    Entanglement wedge minimum cross- section for holographic aether gravity,

    C. Y. Chen, W. Xiong, C. Niu, C. Y. Zhang and P. Liu, “Entanglement wedge minimum cross- section for holographic aether gravity,” JHEP08(2022), 123 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)123 27 [arXiv:2109.03733 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)123 2022

  32. [32]

    Entanglement wedge cross-section with Gauss- Bonnet corrections and thermal quench,

    Y. Z. Li, C. Y. Zhang and X. M. Kuang, “Entanglement wedge cross-section with Gauss- Bonnet corrections and thermal quench,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.64(2021) no.12, 120413 [arXiv:2102.12171 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Entanglement wedge cross-section for noncommutative Yang-Mills theory,

    A. R. Chowdhury, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay, “Entanglement wedge cross-section for noncommutative Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP02, 192 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)192 [arXiv:2106.04562 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2022)192 2022

  34. [34]

    Entanglement wedge cross section in holographic excited states,

    M. Sahraei, M. J. Vasli, M. R. M. Mozaffar and K. B. Velni, “Entanglement wedge cross section in holographic excited states,” JHEP08, 038 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)038 [arXiv:2105.12476 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2021)038 2021

  35. [35]

    Mixed state information theoretic mea- sures in boosted black brane,

    A. Chowdhury Roy, A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay, “Mixed state information theoretic mea- sures in boosted black brane,” [arXiv:2204.08012 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    More on entanglement properties ofLif (2) 4 ×S 1 ×S 5 spacetime with string exci- tations,

    S. Maulik, “More on entanglement properties ofLif (2) 4 ×S 1 ×S 5 spacetime with string exci- tations,” [arXiv:2209.05207 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    Mixed state entanglement measures as probe for confinement,

    P. Jain and S. Mahapatra, “Mixed state entanglement measures as probe for confinement,” Phys. Rev. D102, 126022 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.126022 [arXiv:2010.07702 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.126022 2020

  38. [38]

    Holographic confining/deconfining gauge theories and entanglement measures with a magnetic field,

    P. Jain, S. S. Jena and S. Mahapatra, “Holographic confining/deconfining gauge theories and entanglement measures with a magnetic field,” [arXiv:2209.15355 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  39. [39]

    Foundations of the new field theory,

    M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field theory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, vol. 144, no. 852, pp. 425–451, 1934

    work page 1934

  40. [40]

    Gravitational and electromagnetic mass in the born-infeld electrodynamics,

    B. Hoffmann, “Gravitational and electromagnetic mass in the born-infeld electrodynamics,” Physical Review, vol. 47, no. 11, p. 877, 1935

    work page 1935

  41. [41]

    Black holes in string-generated gravity models,

    D. L. Wiltshire, “Black holes in string-generated gravity models,” Physical Review D, vol. 38, no. 8, p. 2445, 1988

    work page 1988

  42. [42]

    Three dimensional black hole coupled to the born-infeld electrody- namics,

    M. Cataldo and A. Garca “Three dimensional black hole coupled to the born-infeld electrody- namics,” Physics Letters B, vol. 456, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 1999

    work page 1999

  43. [43]

    Massive Born--Infeld and Other Dual Pairs

    S. Ferrara and A. Sagnotti, “Massive Born–Infeld and Other Dual Pairs,” JHEP04(2015), 032 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)032 [arXiv:1502.01650 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)032 2015

  44. [44]

    Born-Infeld black hole in the isolated horizon framework

    N. Breton, “Born-Infeld black hole in the isolated horizon framework,” Phys. Rev. D67(2003), 28 124004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.124004 [arXiv:hep-th/0301254 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.124004 2003

  45. [45]

    Asymptotic charged BTZ black hole solutions

    S. H. Hendi, “Asymptotic charged BTZ black hole solutions,” JHEP03(2012), 065 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2012)065 [arXiv:1405.4941 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2012)065 2012

  46. [46]

    Thermodynamics and Phase Transition of a Nonlinear Elec- trodynamics Black Hole in a Cavity,

    P. Wang, H. Wu and H. Yang, “Thermodynamics and Phase Transition of a Nonlinear Elec- trodynamics Black Hole in a Cavity,” JHEP07(2019), 002 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)002 [arXiv:1901.06216 [gr-qc]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2019)002 2019

  47. [47]

    Steady-state Physics, Effective Temperature Dynamics in Holography

    A. Kundu and S. Kundu, “Steady-state Physics, Effective Temperature Dynamics in Holography,” Phys. Rev. D91, no.4, 046004 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.046004 [arXiv:1307.6607 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.046004 2015

  48. [48]

    Holographic Quantum Liquid,

    A. Karch, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Holographic Quantum Liquid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 051602 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.051602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.051602 2009

  49. [49]

    On Effective Holographic Mott Insulators

    M. Baggioli and O. Pujolas, “On Effective Holographic Mott Insulators,” JHEP12, 107 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2016)107 [arXiv:1604.08915 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2016)107 2016

  50. [50]

    Quantum Criticality and DBI Magneto-resistance

    E. Kiritsis and L. Li, “Quantum Criticality and DBI Magneto-resistance,” J. Phys. A50, no.11, 115402 (2017) doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa59c6 [arXiv:1608.02598 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa59c6 2017

  51. [51]

    Backreacted DBI Magnetotransport with Momentum Dissipation

    S. Cremonini, A. Hoover and L. Li, “Backreacted DBI Magnetotransport with Momentum Dissipation,” JHEP10, 133 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)133 [arXiv:1707.01505 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)133 2017

  52. [52]

    Massive Gravity

    C. de Rham, “Massive Gravity,” Living Rev. Rel.17(2014), 7 doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-7 [arXiv:1401.4173 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-7 2014

  53. [53]

    Holography without translational symmetry

    D. Vegh, “Holography without translational symmetry,” [arXiv:1301.0537 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Holographic superconductors from the massive gravity

    H. B. Zeng and J. P. Wu, “Holographic superconductors from the massive gravity,” Phys. Rev. D90, no.4, 046001 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.046001 [arXiv:1404.5321 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.046001 2014

  55. [55]

    Holographic Polarons, the Metal-Insulator Transition and Massive Gravity

    M. Baggioli and O. Pujolas, “Electron-Phonon Interactions, Metal-Insulator Transi- tions, and Holographic Massive Gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) no.25, 251602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.251602 [arXiv:1411.1003 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.251602 2015

  56. [56]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Massive Gravity

    R. G. Cai, Y. P. Hu, Q. Y. Pan and Y. L. Zhang, “Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Massive Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D91(2015) no.2, 024032 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024032 [arXiv:1409.2369 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.024032 2015

  57. [57]

    Entanglement wedge minimum cross-section in holographic massive gravity theory,

    P. Liu, C. Niu, Z. J. Shi and C. Y. Zhang, “Entanglement wedge minimum cross-section in holographic massive gravity theory,” JHEP08(2021), 113 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)113 29 [arXiv:2104.08070 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2021)113 2021

  58. [58]

    Einstein-Born-Infeld-Massive Gravity: adS-Black Hole Solutions and their Thermodynamical properties

    S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan, “Einstein-Born-Infeld-Massive Gravity: adS-Black Hole Solutions and their Thermodynamical properties,” JHEP11(2015), 157 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)157 [arXiv:1508.01311 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2015)157 2015

  59. [59]

    Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer and M. B. Plenio, “Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a re- view,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010), 277-306 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277 [arXiv:0808.3773 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 2010

  60. [60]

    Characterization of Quantum Phase Transition using Holo- graphic Entanglement Entropy,

    Y. Ling, P. Liu and J. P. Wu, “Characterization of Quantum Phase Transition using Holo- graphic Entanglement Entropy,” Phys. Rev. D93, no. 12, 126004 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    Quantum Computation and Quantum In- formation: 10th Anniversary Edition,

    Nielsen, Michael A. and Chuang, Isaac L., “Quantum Computation and Quantum In- formation: 10th Anniversary Edition,” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2010). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511976667

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976667 2010

  62. [62]

    Holographic Mutual Information is Monogamous

    P. Hayden, M. Headrick and A. Maloney, “Holographic Mutual Information is Monogamous,” Phys. Rev. D87(2013) no.4, 046003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.046003 [arXiv:1107.2940 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.046003 2013

  63. [63]

    Entanglement of purification through holographic duality,

    K. Umemoto and T. Takayanagi, “Entanglement of purification through holographic duality,” Nature Phys.14, no. 6, 573 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Electronic and transport properties of nanotubes,

    J.-C. Charlier, X. Blase, and S. Roche, “Electronic and transport properties of nanotubes,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 79, pp. 677–732, May 2007

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    An investigation of the electri- cal transport properties of graphene-oxide thin films,

    G. Venugopal, K. Krishnamoorthy, R. Mohan, and S.-J. Kim, “An investigation of the electri- cal transport properties of graphene-oxide thin films,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2012

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    Conjugated polymers/semiconductor nanocrystals hybrid materials preparation, electrical transport properties and applications,

    P. Reiss, E. Couderc, J. De Girolamo, and A. Pron, “Conjugated polymers/semiconductor nanocrystals hybrid materials preparation, electrical transport properties and applications,” Nanoscale, vol. 3, pp. 446–489, 2011

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    Thermoelectric DC conductivities from black hole horizons

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, “Thermoelectric DC conductivities from black hole horizons,” JHEP11, 081 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2014)081 [arXiv:1406.4742 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2014)081 2014

  68. [68]

    Novel metals and insulators from holography

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, “Novel metals and insulators from holography,” JHEP06, 007 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2014)007 [arXiv:1401.5077 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2014)007 2014

  69. [69]

    Holographic Axion Model: a simple gravita- tional tool for quantum matter,

    M. Baggioli, K. Y. Kim, L. Li and W. J. Li, “Holographic Axion Model: a simple gravita- tional tool for quantum matter,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.64, no.7, 270001 (2021) 30 doi:10.1007/s11433-021-1681-8 [arXiv:2101.01892 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-021-1681-8 2021

  70. [70]

    Effective holographic theories of momentum relaxation and violation of conductivity bound

    B. Gout´ eraux, E. Kiritsis and W. J. Li, “Effective holographic theories of mo- mentum relaxation and violation of conductivity bound,” JHEP04, 122 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2016)122 [arXiv:1602.01067 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2016)122 2016

  71. [71]

    A Novel Insulator by Holographic Q-lattices

    Y. Ling, P. Liu and J. P. Wu, “A novel insulator by holographic Q-lattices,” JHEP02, 075 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)075 [arXiv:1510.05456 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)075 2016

  72. [72]

    Mixed-state entanglement for AdS Born-Infeld theory,

    P. Liu, Z. Yang, C. Niu, C. Y. Zhang and J. P. Wu, “Mixed-state entanglement for AdS Born-Infeld theory,” JHEP09, 105 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)105 [arXiv:2301.04854 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2023)105 2023

  73. [73]

    Quantum correlations in spin chains at finite temperatures and quantum phase transitions

    T. Werlang, C. Trippe, G. A. P. Ribeiro and G. Rigolin, “Quantum Correlations in Spin Chains at Finite Temperatures and Quantum Phase Transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.105, no.9, 095702 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.095702 [arXiv:1006.3332 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.095702 2010

  74. [74]

    Entanglement Renyi Negativity across a Finite Temperature Transition: A Monte Carlo study,

    K. H. Wu, T. C. Lu, C. M. Chung, Y. J. Kao and T. Grover, “Entanglement Renyi Negativity across a Finite Temperature Transition: A Monte Carlo study,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, no.14, 140603 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.140603 [arXiv:1912.03313 [cond-mat.str-el]]. 31

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.140603 2020