pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.07670 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Tachyonic gravitational dark matter production after inflation

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph
keywords dark matter productioninflationtachyonic instabilityGauss-Bonnet couplingspectator scalarnon-thermal productiongravitational mechanismlattice simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quadratic coupling to the Gauss-Bonnet invariant renders a spectator scalar tachyonic after inflation, producing the observed dark matter density.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that the rapid change in spacetime curvature at the end of inflation can make a spectator scalar field tachyonic through its quadratic coupling to curvature invariants. Focusing on the Gauss-Bonnet term, this instability causes a brief phase of particle production that generates dark matter particles non-thermally. Using lattice simulations, the authors show this mechanism can match the relic density for a wide range of masses and inflationary energy scales, and they supply a fitting formula for practical use.

Core claim

By coupling a real spectator scalar field quadratically to the Gauss-Bonnet topological invariant, the reorganization of curvature after inflation dynamically induces tachyonic instabilities, triggering spontaneous symmetry breaking and explosive gravitational production of dark matter particles whose abundance matches observations.

What carries the argument

Quadratic coupling of the spectator scalar to the Gauss-Bonnet curvature invariant, which generates an effective tachyonic mass term during the post-inflationary transition.

Load-bearing premise

The spectator dark matter field does not significantly back-react on the background spacetime evolution during the short tachyonic phase.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the dark matter relic density cannot be fit by the provided function for any combination of mass and inflationary scale consistent with observations.

read the original abstract

We propose a novel gravitational mechanism for the non-thermal production of dark matter driven by curvature-induced tachyonic instabilities after inflation. Departing from the commonly studied non-minimal couplings to gravity, our framework considers a real spectator scalar field coupled quadratically to spacetime curvature invariants. We show that the rapid reorganization of spacetime curvature at the end of inflation can dynamically render the dark matter field tachyonic, triggering a short-lived phase of spontaneous symmetry breaking and explosive particle production. As a concrete and theoretically controlled example, we focus on the Gauss-Bonnet topological invariant. By combining analytical estimates with $3+1$ classical lattice simulations in the spectator field approximation, we track the out-of-equilibrium evolution of the system and compute the resulting dark matter abundance. We find that this purely gravitational mechanism can robustly reproduce the observed dark matter relic density over a wide range of masses and inflationary scales, providing also a simple fitting function that enables a lattice-independent application of our results.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a gravitational production mechanism for dark matter via tachyonic instabilities induced by quadratic coupling of a spectator scalar to the Gauss-Bonnet curvature invariant after inflation. Using analytical estimates and 3+1 classical lattice simulations in the spectator approximation, the authors compute the resulting relic density and provide a fitting function that reproduces the observed dark matter abundance over a range of masses and inflationary scales.

Significance. If the spectator approximation remains valid, the work demonstrates a purely gravitational, non-thermal DM production channel that operates without additional couplings or interactions. The combination of analytical estimates with explicit 3+1 lattice evolution supplies concrete, reproducible abundance results, and the supplied fitting function allows lattice-independent application within the validated regime.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Lattice Simulations section): The relic-density results are obtained under a fixed FLRW background in the spectator approximation. For the parameter windows that match the observed Omega_DM h^2, the exponential tachyonic growth can drive rho_DM toward a non-negligible fraction of the total energy density before the instability shuts off; an explicit post-simulation check of the maximum rho_DM/rho_total ratio (or an estimate of backreaction on the scale factor) is required to confirm the approximation holds for the quoted mass and H_inf ranges.
  2. [§5] §5 (Results and fitting function): The fitting function is calibrated inside the fixed-background runs and is presented as enabling lattice-independent use. Because its domain of validity is precisely the regime where backreaction remains small, the manuscript should state the quantitative bound (e.g., rho_DM/rho < 0.05) under which the fit may be applied, rather than claiming broad applicability without this caveat.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: replace the qualitative claim 'robustly reproduce' with a quantitative statement of the mass and inflationary-scale intervals where the computed abundance lies within 20% of the observed value.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4 caption: specify the comoving box size, lattice resolution (N^3), and time-stepping scheme used for the production runs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Lattice Simulations section): The relic-density results are obtained under a fixed FLRW background in the spectator approximation. For the parameter windows that match the observed Omega_DM h^2, the exponential tachyonic growth can drive rho_DM toward a non-negligible fraction of the total energy density before the instability shuts off; an explicit post-simulation check of the maximum rho_DM/rho_total ratio (or an estimate of backreaction on the scale factor) is required to confirm the approximation holds for the quoted mass and H_inf ranges.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the spectator approximation is necessary. In the revised manuscript we will add, in §4, a post-simulation analysis of the maximum ρ_DM/ρ_total ratio for all parameter windows that reproduce the observed relic density, together with a brief estimate of possible backreaction on the scale factor. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Results and fitting function): The fitting function is calibrated inside the fixed-background runs and is presented as enabling lattice-independent use. Because its domain of validity is precisely the regime where backreaction remains small, the manuscript should state the quantitative bound (e.g., rho_DM/rho < 0.05) under which the fit may be applied, rather than claiming broad applicability without this caveat.

    Authors: We accept the suggestion. In the revised §5 we will explicitly quote the quantitative upper bound on ρ_DM/ρ_total (extracted from the lattice runs) that defines the domain of validity of the fitting function and will add the corresponding caveat to the text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; relic density computed from explicit lattice evolution

full rationale

The central result follows from direct numerical integration of the scalar field equations on a fixed FLRW background via 3+1 lattice simulations, followed by computation of the energy density after the tachyonic phase ends. The provided fitting function is explicitly described as a post-simulation summary that parametrizes the numerical outcomes for lattice-independent use; it is not an input that defines or forces the abundance. No self-definitional relations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The spectator approximation is an assumption whose validity is external to the computational procedure itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Einstein-Hilbert action augmented by a quadratic Gauss-Bonnet coupling term and on the validity of the spectator-field approximation; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Quadratic coupling coefficient
    The strength of the quadratic coupling between the scalar field and the Gauss-Bonnet invariant is a free parameter that is chosen to reproduce the observed relic density.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Einstein gravity plus quadratic Gauss-Bonnet coupling to a real scalar
    The action is assumed to contain the standard Einstein-Hilbert term plus the Gauss-Bonnet invariant multiplied by the square of the spectator scalar field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5467 in / 1308 out tokens · 46023 ms · 2026-05-16T14:57:01.728469+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 142 canonical work pages · 60 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Rubin and W.K

    V.C. Rubin and W.K. Ford,Rotation of the andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions,The Astrophysical Journal159(1970) 379

  2. [2]

    Weak lensing mass reconstruction of the interacting cluster 1E0657-558: Direct evidence for the existence of dark matter

    D. Clowe, A. Gonzalez and M. Markevitch,Weak lensing mass reconstruction of the interacting cluster 1E0657-558: Direct evidence for the existence of dark matter,Astrophys. J. 604(2004) 596 [astro-ph/0312273]. [3]eBOSScollaboration,Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopi...

  3. [3]

    Schumann, J

    M. Schumann,Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status,J. Phys. G46 (2019) 103003 [1903.03026]. [6]XENONcollaboration,First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 041003 [2303.14729]. [7]LZcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) E...

  4. [4]

    A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter

    J.M. Gaskins,A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter,Contemp. Phys.57 (2016) 496 [1604.00014]

  5. [5]

    Indirect and direct search for dark matter

    M. Klasen, M. Pohl and G. Sigl,Indirect and direct search for dark matter,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.85(2015) 1 [1507.03800]

  6. [6]

    Review of LHC Dark Matter Searches

    F. Kahlhoefer,Review of LHC Dark Matter Searches,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017) 1730006 [1702.02430]. – 27 – [11]ATLAScollaboration,Search for dark matter in association with a Higgs boson decaying to b-quarks inppcollisions at √s= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B765(2017) 11 [1609.04572]. [12]CMScollaboration,Search for associated production of ...

  7. [7]

    Steigman and M.S

    G. Steigman and M.S. Turner,Cosmological Constraints on the Properties of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles,Nucl. Phys. B253(1985) 375

  8. [8]

    A History of Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045002 [1605.04909]

  9. [9]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127

  10. [10]

    Axion Cosmology

    D.J.E. Marsh,Axion Cosmology,Phys. Rept.643(2016) 1 [1510.07633]

  11. [11]

    Adams et al.,Axion Dark Matter, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.14923]

    C.B. Adams et al.,Axion Dark Matter, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.14923]

  12. [12]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

  13. [13]

    The Waning of the WIMP? A Review of Models, Searches, and Constraints

    G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre et al.,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 203 [1703.07364]

  14. [14]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705

  15. [15]

    Ruffini and S

    R. Ruffini and S. Bonazzola,Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,Phys. Rev.187(1969) 1767

  16. [16]

    Carr and S.W

    B.J. Carr and S.W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168(1974) 399

  17. [17]

    Coleman,Q-balls,Nucl

    S.R. Coleman,Q-balls,Nucl. Phys. B262(1985) 263

  18. [18]

    Colpi, S.L

    M. Colpi, S.L. Shapiro and I. Wasserman,Boson Stars: Gravitational Equilibria of Selfinteracting Scalar Fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.57(1986) 2485

  19. [19]

    Axion Miniclusters and Bose Stars

    E.W. Kolb and I.I. Tkachev,Axion miniclusters and Bose stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 3051 [hep-ph/9303313]

  20. [20]

    The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,The Structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J.462(1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025]

  21. [21]

    Supersymmetric Q-balls as dark matter

    A. Kusenko and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Supersymmetric Q balls as dark matter,Phys. Lett. B 418(1998) 46 [hep-ph/9709492]

  22. [22]

    Dense Axion Stars

    E. Braaten, A. Mohapatra and H. Zhang,Dense Axion Stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 121801 [1512.00108]

  23. [23]

    Density profiles of ultracompact minihalos: Implications for constraining the primordial power spectrum

    M.S. Delos, A.L. Erickcek, A.P. Bailey and M.A. Alvarez,Density profiles of ultracompact minihalos: Implications for constraining the primordial power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 063527 [1806.07389]

  24. [24]

    Visinelli, Boson stars and oscillatons: A review, Int

    L. Visinelli,Boson stars and oscillatons: A review,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30(2021) 2130006 [2109.05481]

  25. [25]

    Carr and A.M

    B.J. Carr and A.M. Green,The History of Primordial Black Holes, (2025), DOI [2406.05736]

  26. [26]

    Primordial black holes from fifth forces

    L. Amendola, J. Rubio and C. Wetterich,Primordial black holes from fifth forces,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 081302 [1711.09915]

  27. [27]

    Savastano, L

    S. Savastano, L. Amendola, J. Rubio and C. Wetterich,Primordial dark matter halos from fifth forces,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 083518 [1906.05300]. – 28 –

  28. [28]

    L.W.K. Goh, J. Bachs-Esteban, A. G´ omez-Valent, V. Pettorino and J. Rubio,Observational constraints on early coupled quintessence,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023530 [2308.06406]

  29. [29]

    Holdom,Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,Phys

    B. Holdom,Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 196

  30. [30]

    Hidden Inflaton Dark Matter

    J.P.B. Almeida, N. Bernal, J. Rubio and T. Tenkanen,Hidden inflation dark matter,JCAP 03(2019) 012 [1811.09640]

  31. [31]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli and G. Lanfranchi,The Dark Photon,2005.01515

  32. [32]

    Cembranos, J

    J.A.R. Cembranos, J. Luque and J. Rubio,Scalar dark matter production through the bubble expansion mechanism: the role of the Lorentz factor and non-renormalizable interactions, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 368 [2407.14592]

  33. [33]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana and A. Gruzinov,Cold and fuzzy dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.85(2000) 1158 [astro-ph/0003365]

  34. [34]

    Ferreira,Ultra-light dark matter,Astron

    E.G.M. Ferreira,Ultra-light dark matter,Astron. Astrophys. Rev.29(2021) 7 [2005.03254]

  35. [35]

    Supersymmetry and primordial black hole abundance constraints

    A.M. Green,Supersymmetry and primordial black hole abundance constraints,Phys. Rev. D 60(1999) 063516 [astro-ph/9903484]

  36. [36]

    Gravitino production by primordial black hole evaporation and constraints on the inhomogeneity of the early Universe

    M.Y. Khlopov, A. Barrau and J. Grain,Gravitino production by primordial black hole evaporation and constraints on the inhomogeneity of the early universe,Class. Quant. Grav. 23(2006) 1875 [astro-ph/0406621]

  37. [37]

    D.-C. Dai, K. Freese and D. Stojkovic,Constraints on dark matter particles charged under a hidden gauge group from primordial black holes,JCAP06(2009) 023 [0904.3331]

  38. [38]

    Baryon Asymmetry, Dark Matter, and Density Perturbation from PBH

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, K. Harigaya and R. Matsuda,Baryon asymmetry, dark matter, and density perturbation from primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 103501 [1401.1909]

  39. [39]

    Non-thermal Production of Dark Matter from Primordial Black Holes

    R. Allahverdi, J. Dent and J. Osinski,Nonthermal production of dark matter from primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 055013 [1711.10511]

  40. [40]

    Black Hole Genesis of Dark Matter

    O. Lennon, J. March-Russell, R. Petrossian-Byrne and H. Tillim,Black Hole Genesis of Dark Matter,JCAP04(2018) 009 [1712.07664]

  41. [41]

    Melanopogenesis: Dark Matter of (almost) any Mass and Baryonic Matter from the Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes weighing a Ton (or less)

    L. Morrison, S. Profumo and Y. Yu,Melanopogenesis: Dark Matter of (almost) any Mass and Baryonic Matter from the Evaporation of Primordial Black Holes weighing a Ton (or less), JCAP05(2019) 005 [1812.10606]

  42. [42]

    Hooper, G

    D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and S.D. McDermott,Dark Radiation and Superheavy Dark Matter from Black Hole Domination,JHEP08(2019) 001 [1905.01301]

  43. [43]

    Chaudhuri and A

    A. Chaudhuri and A. Dolgov,PBH Evaporation, Baryon Asymmetry, and Dark Matter,J. Exp. Theor. Phys.133(2021) 552 [2001.11219]

  44. [44]

    Masina,Dark matter and dark radiation from evaporating primordial black holes,Eur

    I. Masina,Dark matter and dark radiation from evaporating primordial black holes,Eur. Phys. J. Plus135(2020) 552 [2004.04740]

  45. [45]

    Baldes, Q

    I. Baldes, Q. Decant, D.C. Hooper and L. Lopez-Honorez,Non-Cold Dark Matter from Primordial Black Hole Evaporation,JCAP08(2020) 045 [2004.14773]

  46. [46]

    Gondolo, P

    P. Gondolo, P. Sandick and B. Shams Es Haghi,Effects of primordial black holes on dark matter models,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 095018 [2009.02424]

  47. [47]

    Bernal and ´O

    N. Bernal and ´O. Zapata,Self-interacting Dark Matter from Primordial Black Holes,JCAP 03(2021) 007 [2010.09725]

  48. [48]

    Bernal and ´O

    N. Bernal and ´O. Zapata,Gravitational dark matter production: primordial black holes and UV freeze-in,Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136129 [2011.02510]

  49. [49]

    Bernal and ´O

    N. Bernal and ´O. Zapata,Dark Matter in the Time of Primordial Black Holes,JCAP03 (2021) 015 [2011.12306]. – 29 –

  50. [50]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner,Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production. I. Solely Hawking radiation,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 015022 [2107.00013]

  51. [51]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner,Primordial black hole evaporation and dark matter production. II. Interplay with the freeze-in or freeze-out mechanism,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 015023 [2107.00016]

  52. [52]

    Bernal, F

    N. Bernal, F. Hajkarim and Y. Xu,Axion Dark Matter in the Time of Primordial Black Holes,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 075007 [2107.13575]

  53. [53]

    Bernal, Y.F

    N. Bernal, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez, Y. Xu and ´O. Zapata,ALP dark matter in a primordial black hole dominated universe,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123536 [2110.04312]

  54. [54]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah, S.J. Das and R. Roshan,Non-thermal origin of asymmetric dark matter from inflaton and primordial black holes,JCAP03(2022) 031 [2111.08034]

  55. [55]

    Barman, D

    B. Barman, D. Borah, S. Das Jyoti and R. Roshan,Cogenesis of Baryon asymmetry and gravitational dark matter from primordial black holes,JCAP08(2022) 068 [2204.10339]

  56. [56]

    Bernal, Y.F

    N. Bernal, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and Y. Xu,Superradiant production of heavy dark matter from primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 015020 [2205.11522]

  57. [57]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner,Redshift effects in particle production from Kerr primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 103012 [2207.09462]

  58. [58]

    Mazde and L

    K. Mazde and L. Visinelli,The interplay between the dark matter axion and primordial black holes,JCAP01(2023) 021 [2209.14307]

  59. [59]

    Cheek, L

    A. Cheek, L. Heurtier, Y.F. Perez-Gonzalez and J. Turner,Evaporation of primordial black holes in the early Universe: Mass and spin distributions,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 015005 [2212.03878]

  60. [60]

    Planckian Interacting Massive Particles as Dark Matter

    M. Garny, M. Sandora and M.S. Sloth,Planckian Interacting Massive Particles as Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 101302 [1511.03278]

  61. [61]

    Theory and Phenomenology of Planckian Interacting Massive Particles as Dark Matter

    M. Garny, A. Palessandro, M. Sandora and M.S. Sloth,Theory and Phenomenology of Planckian Interacting Massive Particles as Dark Matter,JCAP02(2018) 027 [1709.09688]

  62. [62]

    On Thermal Gravitational Contribution to Particle Production and Dark Matter

    Y. Tang and Y.-L. Wu,On Thermal Gravitational Contribution to Particle Production and Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B774(2017) 676 [1708.05138]

  63. [63]

    Spin-2 Portal Dark Matter

    N. Bernal, M. Dutra, Y. Mambrini, K. Olive, M. Peloso and M. Pierre,Spin-2 Portal Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 115020 [1803.01866]

  64. [64]

    Barman and N

    B. Barman and N. Bernal,Gravitational SIMPs,JCAP06(2021) 011 [2104.10699]

  65. [65]

    Clery, Y

    S. Clery, Y. Mambrini, K.A. Olive and S. Verner,Gravitational portals in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 075005 [2112.15214]

  66. [66]

    Mambrini and K.A

    Y. Mambrini and K.A. Olive,Gravitational Production of Dark Matter during Reheating, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 115009 [2102.06214]

  67. [67]

    Clery, Y

    S. Clery, Y. Mambrini, K.A. Olive, A. Shkerin and S. Verner,Gravitational portals with nonminimal couplings,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 095042 [2203.02004]

  68. [68]

    Barman, S

    B. Barman, S. Cl´ ery, R.T. Co, Y. Mambrini and K.A. Olive,Gravity as a portal to reheating, leptogenesis and dark matter,JHEP12(2022) 072 [2210.05716]

  69. [69]

    Higgs boson induced reheating and ultraviolet frozen-in dark matter,

    A. Ahmed, B. Grzadkowski and A. Socha,Higgs boson induced reheating and ultraviolet frozen-in dark matter,JHEP02(2023) 196 [2207.11218]

  70. [70]

    WIMPs, FIMPs, and Inflaton phenomenology via reheating, CMB and ∆N ef f,

    M.R. Haque, D. Maity and R. Mondal,WIMPs, FIMPs, and Inflaton phenomenology via reheating, CMB and∆N ef f,JHEP09(2023) 012 [2301.01641]. – 30 –

  71. [71]

    Kaneta, W

    K. Kaneta, W. Ke, Y. Mambrini, K.A. Olive and S. Verner,Gravitational production of spin-3/2 particles during reheating,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 115027 [2309.15146]

  72. [72]

    Ford,Gravitational Particle Creation and Inflation,Phys

    L.H. Ford,Gravitational Particle Creation and Inflation,Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 2955

  73. [73]

    Dark matter from gravitational particle production at reheating

    T. Markkanen and S. Nurmi,Dark matter from gravitational particle production at reheating, JCAP02(2017) 008 [1512.07288]

  74. [74]

    Pure Gravitational Dark Matter, Its Mass and Signatures

    Y. Tang and Y.-L. Wu,Pure Gravitational Dark Matter, Its Mass and Signatures,Phys. Lett. B758(2016) 402 [1604.04701]

  75. [75]

    Y. Ema, K. Nakayama and Y. Tang,Production of Purely Gravitational Dark Matter,JHEP 09(2018) 135 [1804.07471]

  76. [76]

    Gravitational particle creation for dark matter and reheating

    S. Hashiba and J. Yokoyama,Gravitational particle creation for dark matter and reheating, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 043008 [1812.10032]

  77. [77]

    Despicable Dark Relics: generated by gravity with unconstrained masses

    M. Fairbairn, K. Kainulainen, T. Markkanen and S. Nurmi,Despicable Dark Relics: generated by gravity with unconstrained masses,JCAP04(2019) 005 [1808.08236]

  78. [78]

    Cembranos, L.J

    J.A.R. Cembranos, L.J. Garay and J.M. S´ anchez Vel´ azquez,Gravitational production of scalar dark matter,JHEP06(2020) 084 [1910.13937]

  79. [79]

    Kainulainen, O

    K. Kainulainen, O. Koskivaara and S. Nurmi,Tachyonic production of dark relics: a non-perturbative quantum study,JHEP04(2023) 043 [2209.10945]

  80. [80]

    Kainulainen, S

    K. Kainulainen, S. Nurmi and O. V¨ ais¨ anen,Tachyonic production of dark relics: classical lattice vs. quantum 2PI in Hartree truncation,JHEP10(2024) 009 [2406.17468]

Showing first 80 references.