pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.08628 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-13 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Magnetized dynamical black holes

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 14:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords dynamical black holesEinstein-scalar-Maxwell equationsHarrison transformationdynamical horizonscosmological black holesexact solutionsscalar fieldselectromagnetic fields
0
0 comments X

The pith

Time dependence of external fields can cloak curvature singularities around dynamical black holes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a novel exact solution to the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell equations for a dynamical black hole immersed in a time-dependent electromagnetic field. By dressing a Schwarzschild black hole with a radially and temporally dependent scalar field, it creates a time-dependent version of the Fisher-Janis-Newman-Winicour solution within the Fonarev framework. A Lie point symmetry exports the Harrison transformation effect to this dynamical setting when a spacelike Killing vector is present. The time dependence plays a crucial role in potentially hiding singularities that would be naked in the stationary limit. This provides analytical models that incorporate both a fully dynamical cosmological background and the non-perturbative backreaction of external electromagnetic fields.

Core claim

We construct a novel exact solution of the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell equations describing a dynamical black hole immersed in an external, time-dependent electromagnetic field. The time dependence of the configuration plays a crucial role in potentially cloaking curvature singularities, which would otherwise be generically naked in the stationary limit.

What carries the argument

Lie point symmetry of the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell system that exports the Harrison transformation to dynamical settings when a spacelike Killing vector is present.

If this is right

  • The spacetime combines a spherically symmetric dynamical horizon with an axisymmetric electromagnetic field.
  • It exhibits a rich asymptotic structure mixing Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker and Levi-Civita geometries.
  • The solution allows analysis of trapped surfaces that define the dynamical horizon and its algebraic classification.
  • Possible implications for primordial black holes and astrophysical applications, with extensions to higher dimensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cloaking mechanism suggests that time-dependent effects could help reconcile dynamical black holes with cosmic censorship in magnetized environments.
  • Similar symmetry-based constructions might generate exact solutions for other matter fields coupled to dynamical black holes.
  • Numerical evolution of this initial data could test whether the hidden singularities remain cloaked under perturbations.
  • The mixed asymptotic structure offers a concrete example for studying black holes embedded in both expanding cosmologies and strong electromagnetic backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes a spacelike Killing vector is present so that a Lie point symmetry can export the Harrison transformation effect to the fully dynamical Einstein-scalar-Maxwell system.

What would settle it

Compute the curvature invariants along a radial null geodesic in the stationary limit of the solution and check whether the singularity becomes visible when time dependence is removed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.08628 by Adolfo Cisterna, Amaro D\'iaz, Jibril Ben Achour, Keanu M\"uller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We construct a novel exact solution of the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell equations describing a dynamical black hole immersed in an external, time-dependent electromagnetic field. Motivated by the need for more realistic analytical black hole models, our construction incorporates two key ingredients often neglected in exact solutions: a fully dynamical cosmological background and the non-perturbative backreaction of external electromagnetic fields. The compact object is obtained by dressing a Schwarzschild black hole with a radially and temporally dependent scalar field, yielding a time-dependent generalization of the Fisher-Janis-Newman-Winicour solution within the Fonarev framework. The external electromagnetic field is generated via a Lie point symmetry of the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell system, which exports the effect of a Harrison transformation to dynamical settings provided a spacelike Killing vector is present. The resulting spacetime combines a spherically symmetric dynamical horizon with an axisymmetric electromagnetic field and exhibits a rich asymptotic structure mixing Friedmann-Lema\^itre-Robertson-Walker and Levi-Civita geometries. We show that the time dependence of the configuration plays a crucial role in potentially cloaking curvature singularities, which would otherwise be generically naked in the stationary limit. We analyze the geometric and physical properties of the solution, including its asymptotic behavior, algebraic classification, and the structure of trapped surfaces defining the dynamical horizon. Possible implications for primordial black holes and some astrophysical applications, as well as extensions to higher dimensions, are also discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to construct a novel exact solution of the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell equations describing a dynamical black hole immersed in a time-dependent external electromagnetic field. It dresses a Schwarzschild seed with a radially and temporally dependent scalar field in the Fonarev framework to obtain a time-dependent generalization of the Fisher-Janis-Newman-Winicour solution, then applies a Lie point symmetry generated by a spacelike Killing vector to export the Harrison transformation to the dynamical setting. The resulting spacetime features a spherically symmetric dynamical horizon, axisymmetric electromagnetic field, and mixed FLRW-Levi-Civita asymptotics, with the time dependence argued to cloak curvature singularities that are naked in the stationary limit. Geometric properties, trapped surfaces, and possible implications for primordial black holes are analyzed.

Significance. If the construction is rigorously shown to satisfy the field equations, the result would supply a valuable analytical model for dynamical black holes that incorporates both a fully dynamical cosmological background and non-perturbative electromagnetic backreaction. The demonstration that time dependence can cloak singularities offers a concrete mechanism relevant to singularity resolution in exact solutions, with potential applications to primordial black holes and astrophysical modeling. The technique of using Lie point symmetries to extend stationary transformations to dynamical Einstein-scalar-Maxwell systems is a reusable methodological contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [Construction of the solution] The central claim rests on the Lie point symmetry generated by a spacelike Killing vector successfully mapping the time-dependent Fonarev scalar solution to a valid Einstein-scalar-Maxwell solution. The abstract states this works 'provided a spacelike Killing vector is present,' but the manuscript must explicitly exhibit the symmetry generator, verify its commutation with the time-dependent scalar gradient, and confirm that the transformed stress-energy tensor and Maxwell field continue to satisfy the coupled equations in the dynamical background rather than only in the stationary limit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Asymptotic behavior] The mixing of FLRW and Levi-Civita geometries in the asymptotic structure requires explicit coordinate patches or limiting forms of the metric to make the global structure and matching conditions transparent.
  2. [Geometric and physical properties] The algebraic classification (Petrov type) and the explicit location of trapped surfaces defining the dynamical horizon should be accompanied by sample calculations or a figure showing the evolution of the apparent horizon.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the potential significance of the construction. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Construction of the solution] The central claim rests on the Lie point symmetry generated by a spacelike Killing vector successfully mapping the time-dependent Fonarev scalar solution to a valid Einstein-scalar-Maxwell solution. The abstract states this works 'provided a spacelike Killing vector is present,' but the manuscript must explicitly exhibit the symmetry generator, verify its commutation with the time-dependent scalar gradient, and confirm that the transformed stress-energy tensor and Maxwell field continue to satisfy the coupled equations in the dynamical background rather than only in the stationary limit.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the presentation. In the revised version we will (i) state the symmetry generator explicitly as the Lie derivative along the azimuthal Killing vector ξ = ∂_φ, (ii) compute its action on the scalar gradient and confirm that [ξ, ∇ϕ] = 0 holds identically for the time-dependent Fonarev scalar, and (iii) substitute the transformed Maxwell field and stress-energy tensor directly into the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell system, showing that the equations are preserved because the symmetry is a point symmetry of the full dynamical system (not merely of its stationary reduction). These additions will appear in Section 3 and the accompanying appendix. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: construction applies external Lie-point symmetry to Fonarev-dressed seed under stated assumption

full rationale

The derivation begins with a Schwarzschild seed, applies the known Fonarev scalar dressing to obtain a time-dependent generalization of the Fisher-Janis-Newman-Winicour solution, then invokes a Lie-point symmetry generated by a spacelike Killing vector to import the Harrison transformation. The abstract explicitly conditions the symmetry on the presence of that Killing vector and does not redefine any output quantity in terms of itself or rename a fitted parameter as a prediction. No self-citation chain is shown to be load-bearing for the central existence claim, and the resulting metric and fields are presented as satisfying the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell system by direct construction rather than by tautological re-labeling. The time-dependent cloaking of singularities is a derived geometric property, not an input assumption restated as output.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The solution rests on the Fonarev framework for the scalar field and on the existence of a Lie point symmetry that generates the electromagnetic field when a spacelike Killing vector is present.

free parameters (1)
  • scalar field strength and time dependence
    The radially and temporally dependent scalar field profile is introduced to dress the Schwarzschild seed; its specific functional form and amplitude are free parameters of the construction.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existence of a spacelike Killing vector allowing export of the Harrison transformation to the dynamical Einstein-scalar-Maxwell system
    Invoked to generate the external time-dependent electromagnetic field.
  • domain assumption The Fonarev framework admits a time-dependent generalization of the Fisher-Janis-Newman-Winicour solution
    Used as the base for the dynamical scalar-dressed black hole.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5560 in / 1465 out tokens · 51926 ms · 2026-05-16T14:55:37.537137+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    for Einstein–dilaton–Maxwell theory—which, in a suitable limit, applies to Einstein–scalar–Maxwell the- ory and reproduces at the metric level the effect of an idealized Harrison transformation [26]—can be employed independently of the dynamical character of the source, provided that a spacelike Killing vector is present. Since the time-dependent FJNW sol...

  2. [2]

    Asymptotic behaviour of the fields We begin by analyzing the asymptotic behavior of the metric. Far from the symmetry axis, we find at leading order that ds2 ρ→∞ = (Ct+T) " B2 16 (Ct+T) 2ρ4(−dt2 +dρ 2 +dz 2) + dφ2 B2 16 (Ct+T) 2ρ2 # .(16) This line element represents a dynamical generalization of the Levi–Civita spacetime with parameterσ= 1. Ow- ingtoitsc...

  3. [3]

    Petrov type The algebraic properties of the Melvin–Bonnor space- time are well established. It is algebraically spe- cial—specifically of Petrov type D—and belongs to the Kundt class [38], placing it within the non-expanding sec- tor of the Plebański–Demiański [46] family of solutions. It admits a repeated radial, geodesic principal null direc- tion that ...

  4. [4]

    We refer the reader to that work for the full theoretical background behind the computation; here, we only outline the main logic

    Time-dependent (anti-) trapping horizons In order to identify the trapping horizons, we closely follow the procedure used in [32]. We refer the reader to that work for the full theoretical background behind the computation; here, we only outline the main logic. Given a spacetime manifold(M, g), we first introduce the induced two-dimensional metric qµν =g ...

  5. [5]

    At this stage, the existence of a boundary separating trapped and untrapped regions can already be seen

    forδ= 1whenB= 0, which corresponds precisely to the norm of the MCV for the dynamical FJNW solution originally introduced in [6]. At this stage, the existence of a boundary separating trapped and untrapped regions can already be seen. In fact, upon substituting the corresponding parameter val- ues of our solution space,ξ2 = 1/2andβ= √ 3/2, the loci at whi...

  6. [6]

    While the scope and robustness of the Fonarev scheme are now well understood [32], its inter- play with magnetizing symmetries, to the authors knowl- edge, remained unexplored

    for generating dynamical solutions in Einstein–scalar theory with standard magnetization techniques in GR [26, 33, 37]. While the scope and robustness of the Fonarev scheme are now well understood [32], its inter- play with magnetizing symmetries, to the authors knowl- edge, remained unexplored. Theunderlyingreasonbehindtheexistenceofoursolu- tion is clea...

  7. [7]

    G. C. McVittie, The mass-particle in an expanding uni- verse, Mon93, 325 (1933)

  8. [8]

    Einstein and E

    A. Einstein and E. G. Straus, The influence of the ex- pansion of space on the gravitation fields surrounding the individual stars, Rev. Mod17, 120 (1945)

  9. [9]

    R. C. Tolman, Effect of imhomogeneity on cosmological models, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.20, 169 (1934)

  10. [10]

    Demianski and J

    M. Demianski and J. P. Lasota, Black Holes in an Expanding Universe, Nature Physical Science241, 53 (1973)

  11. [11]

    G. S. N. Thakurta, Kerr metric in an expanding universe, Indian J.Phys.B55, 304 (1981)

  12. [12]

    Exact solution for scalar field collapse

    V. Husain, E. A. Martinez, and D. Nunez, Exact solution for scalar field collapse, Phys. Rev. D50, 3783 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9402021

  13. [13]

    O. A. Fonarev, Exact Einstein scalar field solutions for formation of black holes in a cosmological setting, Class. Quant. Grav.12, 1739 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9409020

  14. [14]

    Generating dynamical black hole solutions

    D. Kothawala and S. G. Ghosh, Generating dynamical black hole solutions, Phys. Rev. D70, 104010 (2004), arXiv:1007.2500 [gr-qc]

  15. [15]

    G. W. Gibbons and K.-i. Maeda, Black Holes in an Ex- panding Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 131101 (2010), arXiv:0912.2809 [gr-qc]

  16. [16]

    Kerr-de Sitter Universe

    S. Akcay and R. A. Matzner, Kerr-de Sitter Universe, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 085012 (2011), arXiv:1011.0479 [gr-qc]

  17. [17]

    M. M. C. Mello, A. Maciel, and V. T. Zanchin, Evolving black holes from conformal transformations of static solu- tions, Phys. Rev. D95, 084031 (2017), arXiv:1611.05077 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    Black Hole in a Radiation-Dominated Universe

    E. Babichev, V. Dokuchaev, and Y. N. Eroshenko, Black Hole in a Radiation-Dominated Universe, Astron. Lett. 44, 491 (2018), arXiv:1811.07189 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    Xavier, A

    S. Xavier, A. Sunny, and S. Shankaranarayanan, Exact model for evaporating primordial black holes in a cos- mological spacetime, Phys. Rev. D105, 104038 (2022), arXiv:2110.14379 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    K. S. Croker, M. J. Zevin, D. Farrah, K. A. Nishimura, and G. Tarle, Cosmologically Coupled Compact Ob- jects: A Single-parameter Model for LIGO–Virgo Mass and Redshift Distributions, Astrophys. J. Lett.921, L22 (2021), arXiv:2109.08146 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Heydari and K

    S. Heydari and K. Karami, Primordial black holes in non- minimal derivative coupling inflation with quartic poten- tial and reheating consideration, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 83 (2022), arXiv:2107.10550 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    T. Sato, H. Maeda, and T. Harada, Conformally Schwarzschild cosmological black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 215011 (2022), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 40, 079501 (2023)], arXiv:2206.10998 [gr-qc]

  23. [23]

    Babichev, C

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, and N. Lecoeur, Rotating black holes embedded in a cosmological background for scalar-tensor theories, JCAP08, 022, arXiv:2305.17129 [gr-qc]

  24. [24]

    J. Tang, Y. Huang, and H. Zhang, Matching mcvittie spacetimes, Commun. Theor. Phys.77, 115404 (2025), arXiv:2412.19157 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    I. M. Rasulian and A. Ashoorioon, Static horizons in cos- mology (2025), arXiv:2504.20701 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    Bertotti, Uniform electromagnetic field in the theory of general relativity, Phys

    B. Bertotti, Uniform electromagnetic field in the theory of general relativity, Phys. Rev.116, 1331 (1959)

  27. [27]

    G. A. Alekseev and A. A. Garcia, Schwarzschild black hole immersed in a homogeneous electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. D53, 1853 (1996)

  28. [28]

    M. A. Melvin and J. S. Wallingford, Orbits in a magnetic universe, J.Math.Phys.7, 333 (1966)

  29. [29]

    W. B. Bonnor, Static Magnetic Fields in General Rela- tivity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A67, 225 (1954)

  30. [30]

    F. J. Ernst, New Formulation of the Axially Symmetric Gravitational Field Problem. II, Phys. Rev.168, 1415 (1968)

  31. [31]

    F. J. Ernst, New formulation of the axially symmetric gravitational field problem, Phys. Rev.167, 1175 (1968)

  32. [32]

    Harrison, New solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equa- tions from old, J.Math.Phys.9, 1744 (1968)

    B. Harrison, New solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equa- tions from old, J.Math.Phys.9, 1744 (1968)

  33. [33]

    G. A. Alekseev, Sov. Phys. Dokl.30, 565 (1985)

  34. [34]

    G. A. Alekseev, Mat. Inst. Steklova176, 211 (1987)

  35. [35]

    G. A. Alekseev, General Relativity and Gmuitation 1992, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference, Cor- doba, Argentina, edited by R. J. Gleiser, C. N. Kozmeh, and O. M. Moreschi (1993)

  36. [36]

    I. Z. Fisher, Scalar mesostatic field with regard for grav- itational effects, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.18, 636 (1948), arXiv:gr-qc/9911008

  37. [37]

    A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour, Reality of the Schwarzschild Singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 878 (1968)

  38. [38]

    Ben Achour, A

    J. Ben Achour, A. Cisterna, and M. Hassaine, Primor- dial axisymmetric compact objects in General Relativity (2025), arXiv:2512.19542 [gr-qc]

  39. [39]

    Pair Creation of Dilaton Black Holes

    F. Dowker, J. P. Gauntlett, D. A. Kastor, and J. H. Traschen, Pair creation of dilaton black holes, Phys. Rev. D49, 2909 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9309075

  40. [40]

    Generating Minimally Coupled Einstein-Scalar Field Solutions from Vacuum Solutions with Arbitrary Cosmological Constant

    K. Tangen, Generating Minimally Coupled Einstein- Scalar Field Solutions from Vacuum Solutions with Ar- bitrary Cosmological Constant (2007), arXiv:0705.4372 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Global structure and physical interpretation of the Fonarev solution for a scalar field with exponential potential

    H. Maeda, Global structure and physical interpretation of the Fonarev solution for a scalar field with exponential potential (2007), arXiv:0704.2731 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Kinnersley, Generation of stationary Einstein- Maxwell fields, J.Math.Phys.14, 651 (1973)

    W. Kinnersley, Generation of stationary Einstein- Maxwell fields, J.Math.Phys.14, 651 (1973)

  43. [43]

    F. J. Ernst and W. J. Wild, Kerr black holes in a mag- netic universe, J. Math. Phys.17, 182 (1976)

  44. [44]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt,Exact solutions of Ein- stein’s field equations, Cambridge Monographs on Math- ematical Physics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003)

  45. [45]

    I. G. Contopoulos, F. P. Esposito, K. Kleidis, D. B. Papadopoulos, and L. Witten, Generating Solutions to the Einstein Field Equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, 1650022 (2015), arXiv:1501.03968 [gr-qc]

  46. [46]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, K. Müller, and K. Pallikaris, A new exact rotating spacetime in vac- uum: The Kerr–Levi-Civita spacetime, Phys. Lett. B 871, 140035 (2025), arXiv:2506.07166 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Magnetic

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, I. Kolář, K. Müller, M. Oyarzo, and K. Pallikaris, Mixing “Magnetic” and “Electric” Ehlers–Harrison transformations: the electromagnetic swirling spacetime and novel type 13 I backgrounds, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 724 (2024), arXiv:2401.02924 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    Barrientos, A

    J. Barrientos, A. Cisterna, M. Hassaine, and J. Oliva, Re- visiting Buchdahl transformations: new static and rotat- ing black holes in vacuum, double copy, and hairy exten- sions, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1011 (2024), arXiv:2404.12194 [gr-qc]

  49. [49]

    Di Pinto, S

    A. Di Pinto, S. Klemm, and A. Viganò, Kerr-Newman black hole in a Melvin-swirling universe, JHEP06, 150, arXiv:2503.07780 [gr-qc]

  50. [50]

    Magnetic Fields in an Expanding Universe

    D. Kastor and J. Traschen, Magnetic Fields in an Expanding Universe, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 075023 (2014), arXiv:1312.4923 [hep-th]

  51. [51]

    Melvin Magnetic Fluxtube/Cosmology Correspondence

    D. Kastor and J. Traschen, Melvin Magnetic Flux- tube/Cosmology Correspondence, Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 235027 (2015), arXiv:1507.05534 [hep-th]

  52. [52]

    J. F. Plebanski and M. Demianski, Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity, An- nals Phys.98, 98 (1976)

  53. [53]

    B. C. Nolan, A Point mass in an isotropic universe: Exis- tence, uniqueness and basic properties, Phys. Rev. D58, 064006 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9805041

  54. [54]

    B. C. Nolan, A Point mass in an isotropic universe. 3. The region R less than or = to 2m, Class. Quant. Grav. 16, 3183 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9907018

  55. [55]

    B. C. Nolan, A Point mass in an isotropic universe. 2. Global properties, Class. Quant. Grav.16, 1227 (1999)

  56. [56]

    McVittie's Legacy: Black Holes in an Expanding Universe

    N. Kaloper, M. Kleban, and D. Martin, McVittie’s Legacy: Black Holes in an Expanding Universe, Phys. Rev. D81, 104044 (2010), arXiv:1003.4777 [hep-th]

  57. [57]

    Kobakhidze and Z

    A. Kobakhidze and Z. S. C. Picker, Apparent horizons of the Thakurta spacetime and the description of cos- mological black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 347 (2022), arXiv:2112.13921 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    Hütsi, T

    G. Hütsi, T. Koivisto, M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veermäe, Cosmological black holes are not described by the Thakurta metric: LIGO-Virgo bounds on PBHs remain unchanged, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 999 (2021), arXiv:2105.09328 [astro-ph.CO]

  59. [59]

    Boehm, A

    C. Boehm, A. Kobakhidze, C. A. J. O’Hare, Z. S. C. Picker, and M. Sakellariadou, Comment on: Cosmologi- cal black holes are not described by the Thakurta metric (2021), arXiv:2105.14908 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [60]

    Harada, H

    T. Harada, H. Maeda, and T. Sato, Thakurta metric does notdescribeacosmologicalblackhole,Phys.Lett.B833, 137332 (2022), arXiv:2106.06651 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    Apparent horizons of the Thakurta spacetime and the description of cosmological black holes

    A. Maciel and V. T. Zanchin, Comment on “Apparent horizons of the Thakurta spacetime and the description of cosmological black holes”, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1109 (2024), arXiv:2407.06365 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    Rel.28, 8 (2025), arXiv:2502.11825 [gr-qc]

    A.AshtekarandB.Krishnan,Quasi-localblackholehori- zons: recentadvances, Living Rev. Rel.28, 8 (2025), arXiv:2502.11825 [gr-qc]

  63. [63]

    Dynamical Horizons: Energy, Angular Momentum, Fluxes and Balance Laws

    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Dynamical horizons: En- ergy, angular momentum, fluxes and balance laws, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 261101 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0207080

  64. [64]

    Dynamical Horizons and their Properties

    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Dynamical horizons and their properties, Phys. Rev. D68, 104030 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0308033

  65. [65]

    Isolated and dynamical horizons and their applications

    A. Ashtekar and B. Krishnan, Isolated and dynamical horizons and their applications, Living Rev. Rel.7, 10 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407042

  66. [66]

    Dynamical Black Holes: Approach to the Final State

    A. Ashtekar, M. Campiglia, and S. Shah, Dynamical Black Holes: Approach to the Final State, Phys. Rev. D88, 064045 (2013), arXiv:1306.5697 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    R. M. Wald and V. Iyer, Trapped surfaces in the Schwarzschild geometry and cosmic censorship, Phys. Rev. D44, R3719 (1991)

  68. [68]

    Non-symmetric trapped surfaces in the Schwarzschild and Vaidya spacetimes

    E. Schnetter and B. Krishnan, Non-symmetric trapped surfaces in the Schwarzschild and Vaidya spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D73, 021502 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511017

  69. [69]

    Foliation dependence of black hole apparent horizons in spherical symmetry

    V. Faraoni, G. F. R. Ellis, J. T. Firouzjaee, A. Helou, and I. Musco, Foliation dependence of black hole apparent horizons in spherical symmetry, Phys. Rev. D95, 024008 (2017), arXiv:1610.05822 [gr-qc]

  70. [70]

    Dotti, Black hole regions containing no trapped surfaces, Class

    G. Dotti, Black hole regions containing no trapped surfaces, Class. Quant. Grav.41, 015015 (2024), arXiv:2308.13950 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    Dotti, Obstructions for trapped submanifolds, Class

    G. Dotti, Obstructions for trapped submanifolds, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 165002 (2025), arXiv:2504.01207 [gr- qc]

  72. [72]

    Kodama, Conserved Energy Flux for the Spherically Symmetric System and the Back Reaction Problem in the Black Hole Evaporation, Prog

    H. Kodama, Conserved Energy Flux for the Spherically Symmetric System and the Back Reaction Problem in the Black Hole Evaporation, Prog. Theor. Phys.63, 1217 (1980)

  73. [73]

    Kinoshita, Geometrical origin of the Kodama vector, Phys

    S. Kinoshita, Geometrical origin of the Kodama vector, Phys. Rev. D110, 044056 (2024), arXiv:2402.16484 [gr- qc]

  74. [74]

    S. C. Anco, Mean curvature flow and quasilocal mass for two-surfaces in Hamiltonian General Relativity, J. Math. Phys.48, 052502 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0402057

  75. [75]

    J. M. M. Senovilla and R. Torres, Particle produc- tion from marginally trapped surfaces of general space- times, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 085004 (2015), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 32, 189501 (2015)], arXiv:1409.6044 [gr-qc]

  76. [76]

    Faraoni,Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Hori- zons, Vol

    V. Faraoni,Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Hori- zons, Vol. 907 (2015)

  77. [77]

    R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Electromagnetic ex- tractions of energy from Kerr black holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.179, 433 (1977)

  78. [78]

    H. A. Buchdahl, Reciprocal Static Metrics and Scalar Fields in the General Theory of Relativity, Phys. Rev. 115, 1325 (1959)

  79. [79]

    Higher dimensional black holes in external magnetic fields

    M. Ortaggio, Higher dimensional black holes in external magnetic fields, JHEP05, 048, arXiv:gr-qc/0410048